Tony Abbott's Obsession with Peta Credlin Behind His Downfall

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tony Abbott's Obsession with Peta Credlin Behind His Downfall Tony Abbott’s obsession with Peta Credlin behind his downfall THE AUSTRALIAN MARCH 5, 2016 12:00AM Niki Savva Opinion columnist Canberra A month before he was toppled by Malcolm Turnbull, Tony Abbott received an alert from an unusual quarter. The deputy leader of the National Party, Barnaby Joyce, left the early-morning leadership group meeting that was held every sitting day in the prime minister’s office to walk with Abbott to a function in the Great Hall. As they made their way, Joyce told the prime minister he would face a challenge from Turnbull around the time of the Canning by-election. It was August 2015. Like others, Joyce could see the signs: unusual groupings at dinner, which Joyce later likened to springing people out and about with their mistresses; a few embarrassed looks; odd expressions here and there. As an old boy of St Ignatius’ College, Riverview, Joyce was still well- plugged into the Sydney scene, picking up on the vibe and gossip about Abbott. He was also hearing things from contacts close to NSW federal Liberals. Joyce could read the polls, too, and as he would later say, you didn’t have to be Sigmund Freud to understand their deeper meaning. Abbott’s leadership was terminal. Joyce had been very close to Abbott, but there had been a serious falling out, triggered by a number of factors. Joyce had quietly stood aside as shadow finance minister when Abbott as opposition leader came under pressure to dump him. When the Nationals’ leader, Warren Truss, fell seriously ill towards the end of 2014, Joyce read reports that the prime minister wanted Truss to stay on because he feared instability would engulf the Coalition if Joyce were to become leader. Joyce was infuriated by those reports but stayed silent publicly. He was convinced they were sourced from deep inside the prime minister’s office. Joyce made no secret of his displeasure at Abbott’s delegation of power to his chief of staff, Peta Credlin. In his typically wildly funny, wildly politically incorrect, irreverent way, he would joke privately about the eunuchs being in charge. Pretty soon, Joyce could find little to laugh about. In July 2015, when the government approved the $1.2 billion Shenhua coalmine on the Liverpool Plains in his electorate, Joyce snapped, declaring the world had gone mad. Not long after that, Joyce concluded Abbott would not recover and that the prime minister should think seriously about stepping down. Nevertheless, when he suspected there were moves afoot to unseat the prime minister, he thought he owed it to him — because Joyce had always seen Abbott as an incredibly kind man, even though his first duty was to protect his own leader, Truss — to warn him. Abbott neither responded to Joyce’s warning nor engaged with him about it. He simply changed the subject. Despite that, Joyce felt good about having done what he thought was the right thing. There was something else Joyce was girding himself to do if Christmas came around and Abbott was still limping along in the job, with the opinion polls where he expected them to be. He was going to tell Abbott he should do the decent thing and step down as prime minister. Unlike Abbott’s Liberal cabinet colleagues, Joyce firmly believed that, in these circumstances, Abbott would accept it was beyond him to recover and that he would quit. He did not think Abbott was the kind of man who would stay on to drive them all over a cliff, which is what they thought would inevitably happen if Abbott remained in the job. Joyce would have had the guts to do it, too. He thought that would have been a more fitting end to Abbott’s rule than to be voted out by his colleagues. Whether Joyce’s confidence in what Abbott would do was well placed was another matter entirely. There were so many warnings, so much advice from so many people to Abbott, at so many different times, on so many different issues. He ignored them all. He did not listen to Julie Bishop, Joe Hockey and Christopher Pyne when they told him immediately after the election to appoint more women to cabinet. He did not listen to Peter Dutton when he told him to kill off the Medicare co-payment, nor later when he urged him to remove Hockey from Treasury so he could appoint Malcolm Turnbull to the job. He did not listen to John Howard when he told him not to reintroduce knights and dames, when he warned him about delegating too much of his authority to his chief of staff, and similarly when he advised him to appoint Turnbull as treasurer. In fact, Abbott ignored every significant piece of advice that Howard gave him. Abbott particularly refused to take the advice regarding his chief of staff, including from his friends, people who had been through the wars with him, who believed his relationship with Credlin was destroying his prime ministership. Connie Fierravanti-Wells had always been able to speak frankly with Abbott. They went back a long way, having first met in 1990 when they were both staffers in opposition. She also ran against Abbott as a candidate for preselection for Warringah in 1994, but still thinks that Abbott was the best candidate on the day. She was there when he rang his wife, Margie, to tell her he had won endorsement, urging her to come down and bring the girls with her. Connie remained true to the leader, but she was not blind to his faults. In early 2015, she could see the damage that was being inflicted on Abbott inside the parliamentary party. Even her own loyalty had been severely tested. There was briefing going on against her before the 2013 election, which she sourced back to Abbott’s office. After the election, she did not make it into the ministry; rather, she was appointed parliamentary secretary to the minister for social services, despite her hard work on aged care and mental health policy, and despite the fact there was a crying need for more women in the cabinet — especially after fellow conservative Sophie Mirabella was defeated. She was disappointed she didn’t make it. Nevertheless, she didn’t make a fuss and worked hard, hoping for promotion later. As the senior conservative from NSW, she represented the views of many of Abbott’s base who did not want to see him ousted. Late on the night before the spill motion against him in February 2015, she visited him in his office, a bit after 10pm. She was brutally frank with him, raising something few people would dare broach but which only a woman who had known him a long time could, while hoping he would appreciate she had his best interests at heart. She believed he needed to hear, unfiltered, exactly what his colleagues were really thinking. In their view, he had to remove his chief of staff because they blamed her for many of the government’s problems and they resented her treatment of them. This was not only about the abuse she heaped on them, but the fact he had closed himself off from them — a separation they blamed on Credlin. Connie told him, without mincing words, that they were prepared to take it out on him because they did not like her. She told him it was important that he get rid of her because politics was not only about what was real. ‘‘Politics is about perceptions,’’ she told him. ‘‘Rightly or wrongly, the perception is that you are sleeping with your chief of staff. That’s the perception, and you need to deal with it.’’ She told him she was speaking on behalf of many people in the NSW division who cared for him, who did not want him to lose his prime ministership. She warned him that if he did not move her on, he would lose his prime ministership. ‘‘I am here because I care about you, and I care about your family, and I feel I need to tell you the truth, the brutal truth. This is what your colleagues really think,’’ she said to him. Abbott told her he wasn’t going to move Credlin on. He said the rumours they were having an affair were not true. Abbott did not get angry when Connie confronted him about this most sensitive of matters. He did not remonstrate or raise his voice. He simply, calmly, denied it. Within two days after she had spoken to Abbott, after the vote that mortally wounded the prime minister, Credlin visited Connie in her office, a typical backbencher’s room made warmly personal by the display of family knick-knacks, including beautifully intricate doilies handmade by her Italian grandmother. They talked for an hour and a half. Connie was equally frank with Credlin, telling her she had to go. She also told Credlin about the rumours — that colleagues believed she and Abbott were having an affair. Credlin also denied it, saying it wasn’t true, that they were not having a relationship. Connie told Credlin that, for Abbott’s sake, she should go. Credlin said she believed she was vitally important to Tony, that without her he would not be able to do his job. She believed Tony’s enemies were trying to get to him through her. Credlin gave no hint that she had even thought about going, not even for a moment. Connie was troubled because she remained convinced this would result in an extremely unhappy ending for Abbott.
Recommended publications
  • A History of Misconduct: the Case for a Federal Icac
    MISCONDUCT IN POLITICS A HISTORY OF MISCONDUCT: THE CASE FOR A FEDERAL ICAC INDEPENDENT JO URNALISTS MICH AEL WES T A ND CALLUM F OOTE, COMMISSIONED B Y G ETUP 1 MISCONDUCT IN POLITICS MISCONDUCT IN RESOURCES, WATER AND LAND MANAGEMENT Page 5 MISCONDUCT RELATED TO UNDISCLOSED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Page 8 POTENTIAL MISCONDUCT IN LOBBYING MISCONDUCT ACTIVITIES RELATED TO Page 11 INAPPROPRIATE USE OF TRANSPORT Page 13 POLITICAL DONATION SCANDALS Page 14 FOREIGN INFLUENCE ON THE POLITICAL PROCESS Page 16 ALLEGEDLY FRAUDULENT PRACTICES Page 17 CURRENT CORRUPTION WATCHDOG PROPOSALS Page 20 2 MISCONDUCT IN POLITICS FOREWORD: Trust in government has never been so low. This crisis in public confidence is driven by the widespread perception that politics is corrupt and politicians and public servants have failed to be held accountable. This report identifies the political scandals of the and other misuse of public money involving last six years and the failure of our elected leaders government grants. At the direction of a minister, to properly investigate this misconduct. public money was targeted at voters in marginal electorates just before a Federal Election, In 1984, customs officers discovered a teddy bear potentially affecting the course of government in in the luggage of Federal Government minister Australia. Mick Young and his wife. It had not been declared on the Minister’s customs declaration. Young This cheating on an industrial scale reflects a stepped aside as a minister while an investigation political culture which is evolving dangerously. into the “Paddington Bear Affair” took place. The weapons of the state are deployed against journalists reporting on politics, and whistleblowers That was during the prime ministership of Bob in the public service - while at the same time we Hawke.
    [Show full text]
  • First Century Fox Inc and Sky Plc; European Intervention Notice
    Rt Hon Karen Bradley Secretary of State for Digital Culture Media and Sport July 14 2017 Dear Secretary of State Twenty-First Century Fox Inc and Sky plc; European Intervention Notice The Campaign for Press and Broadcasting is responding to your request for new submissions on the test of commitment to broadcasting standards. We are pleased to submit this short supplement to the submission we provided for Ofcom in March. As requested, the information is up-to-date, but we are adding an appeal to you to reconsider Ofcom’s recommendation to accept the 21CF bid on this ground, which we find wholly unconvincing in the light of the evidence we submitted. SKY NEWS IN AUSTRALIA In a pre-echo of the current buyout bid in the UK, Sky News Australia, previously jointly- owned with other media owners, became wholly owned by the Murdochs on December 1 last year. When the CPBF made its submission on the Commitment to Broadcasting Standards EIN to Ofcom in March there were three months of operation by which to judge the direction of the channel, but now there are three months more. A number of commentaries have been published. The Murdoch entity that controls Sky Australia is News Corporation rather than 21FC but the service is clearly following the Fox formula about which the CPBF commented to Ofcom. Indeed it is taking the model of broadcasting high-octane right-wing political commentary in peak viewing times even further. While Fox News has three continuous hours of talk shows on weekday evenings, Sky News Australia has five.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue
    Issue 80 07 March 201 6 to 15 April 2016 Saving you time for nine years. Another Seasonal Edition IN THIS ISSUE: Double Dissolution or Otherwise Billson Franchise role Kennett on Turnbull Greens no longer the nutters they were Royal Commission into banks? What is debt? Rudd on the move Same sex marriage law. New England Fight Hats allowed in Parliament Abbott hits back at book ACCC furious over Coles criticism Shorten’s bombsell crackdown Safe Schools Contact Us Affairs of State Letter from Canberra 14 Collins Street Melbourne, 3000 A monthly digest of news from around Australia. Victoria, Australia P 03 9654 1300 Saving you time; now in its eighth year. F 03 9654 1165 Contents [email protected] www.affairs.com.au 3 Editorial 13 Agriculture, Cattle & Water 3 Feature Item 1 13 Media Letter From Canberra is a monthly public affairs 4 Feature Item 2 13 Justice bulletin, a simple précis, distilling and interpreting 4 Governance 14 Broadband & IT public policy and government decisions, which 7 Party Happenings 14 Welfare affect business opportunities in Victoria and Australia. 8 Industrial Relations and Employment 14 Transport & Infrastructure 9 Business, Economy, Manufacturing, Finance 14 Education Written for the regular traveller, or people with 10 Mining 16 Foreign Affairs meeting-filled days, it’s more about business 10 Trade 17 Defence opportunities than politics. 10 Refugees & Immigration 17 Indigenous Letter from Canberra is independent. It’s not party 11 Tax 18 Sports & Arts political or any other political. It does not have the 11 Tourism 18 Society imprimatur of government at any level.
    [Show full text]
  • A Feminist Analysis of Female Political Potential Within the Masculinist State
    Olivia Freund* The University of Newcastle, Australia The Vanguard’s Voice: a Feminist Analysis of Female Political Potential within the Masculinist State This analysis presents two comparative examples of the first female Australian Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, and former Prime Ministerial Chief of Staff, Peta Credlin, which demonstrate twofold how women in the political environment are inherently positioned as threats to patriarchal state processes and subconsciously adopt masculine behaviours in their professional practice. This reveals the coercive nature of the patriarchal state as it fundamentally subverts female political advancement and actively shapes political spaces to reproduce patriarchal hegemony. Keywords: Australian Labor Party, Australian Liberal Party, hegemony, professionalism, Federal politics, female leadership, internalised misogyny Introduction olitical hierarchies and social conventions in modern Western history P have been fundamentally shaped by gender differences, largely centring male advancement premised on the subordination and struggles of women. The role of the state throughout modern history has been integral in centring political hierarchies and structuring social convention. Alongside this, movements for women’s change have not always emphasised challenging the patriarchal motivations in the state framework but have certainly attempted to deconstruct patriarchal oppressions manifest on a personal platform. This analysis presents two contrasting examples which illustrate the power of the patriarchal state and its diverse manifestations – Australia’s first female Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, was positioned as a political ‘vanguard’ who challenged the structural gender hierarchy in politics but was also coerced into reinforcing patriarchal standards in her policies, and former Prime Ministerial chief of staff, Peta Credlin, who observably embodied masculine leadership traits in demonstrating how internalised misogyny perpetuates patriarchal norms.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Staff Under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution Or Black Hole?
    Ministerial Staff Under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution or Black Hole? Author Tiernan, Anne-Maree Published 2005 Thesis Type Thesis (PhD Doctorate) School Department of Politics and Public Policy DOI https://doi.org/10.25904/1912/3587 Copyright Statement The author owns the copyright in this thesis, unless stated otherwise. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/367746 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Ministerial Staff under the Howard Government: Problem, Solution or Black Hole? Anne-Maree Tiernan BA (Australian National University) BComm (Hons) (Griffith University) Department of Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2004 Abstract This thesis traces the development of the ministerial staffing system in Australian Commonwealth government from 1972 to the present. It explores four aspects of its contemporary operations that are potentially problematic. These are: the accountability of ministerial staff, their conduct and behaviour, the adequacy of current arrangements for managing and controlling the staff, and their fit within a Westminster-style political system. In the thirty years since its formal introduction by the Whitlam government, the ministerial staffing system has evolved to become a powerful new political institution within the Australian core executive. Its growing importance is reflected in the significant growth in ministerial staff numbers, in their increasing seniority and status, and in the progressive expansion of their role and influence. There is now broad acceptance that ministerial staff play necessary and legitimate roles, assisting overloaded ministers to cope with the unrelenting demands of their jobs. However, recent controversies involving ministerial staff indicate that concerns persist about their accountability, about their role and conduct, and about their impact on the system of advice and support to ministers and prime ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Mainstream Media Coverage Peter Chen
    20 Non-Mainstream Media Coverage Peter Chen From a media diversity perspective, Australia’s standing as an established democracy is not strong. When compared with peer democracies, Australia has the most concentrated media system in the world (Australian Collaboration 2015). The causes of this are various, but include comparatively small market size, ‘dumping’ of English-language content into the Australian market and lacklustre media policy that has facilitated media conglomerates to consolidate their market share (Winseck 2008). As part of this story, the popularisation of the internet over the last two decades has been an exacerbating factor and corrective: undermining the economic basis of established commercial media and eroding domestic regulatory capacity, while at the same time providing the capacity for the establishment of ‘new presses’. This chapter focuses on the conduct and performance of these ‘new presses’ in the 2016 federal election campaign. While the majority of these new media groups happens to be an internet-based press, the emphasis of this chapter is not on the technological basis of supply per se, but on their relative newness into the Australia marketplace. This breaks with a traditional tendency to see ‘new media’ as internet-based media, an increasingly meaningless classification tool given the increasing incorporation of new technology into the established media, as discussed by Andrea Carson and Brian McNair (Chapter 19, this volume). 453 DOUBLE DISILLUSION Method The primary research method employed for this chapter is the content analysis of articles published in 10 ‘new’ Australian-based1 publications— each less than seven years old2—that published material during the formal election period from 8 May to 1 July 2016 inclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Sceptical Climate Part 2: CLIMATE SCIENCE in AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPERS
    October 2013 Sceptical Climate Part 2: CLIMATE SCIENCE IN AUSTRALIAN NEWSPAPERS Professor Wendy Bacon Australian Centre for Independent Journalism Sceptical Climate Part 2: Climate Science in Australian Newspapers ISBN: 978-0-9870682-4-8 Release date: 30th October 2013 REPORT AUTHOR & DIRECTOR OF PROJECT: Professor Wendy Bacon (Australian Centre for Independent Journalism, University of Technology, Sydney) PROJECT MANAGER & RESEARCH SUPERVISOR: Arunn Jegan (Australian Centre for Independent Journalism) PROJECT & RESEARCH ADVISOR: Professor Chris Nash (Monash University) DESIGN AND WEB DEVELOPMENT Collagraph (http://collagraph.com.au) RESEARCHERS: Nicole Gooch, Katherine Cuttriss, Matthew Johnson, Rachel Sibley, Katerina Lebedev, Joel Rosenveig Holland, Federica Gasparini, Sophia Adams, Marcus Synott, Julia Wylie, Simon Phan & Emma Bacon ACIJ DIRECTOR: Associate Professor Tom Morton (Australian Centre for Independent Journalism, University of Technology, Sydney) ACIJ MANAGER: Jan McClelland (Australian Centre for Independent Journalism) THE AUSTRALIAN CENTRE FOR INDEPENDENT JOURNALISM The Sceptical Climate Report is a project by The Australian Centre for Independent Journalism, a critical voice on media politics, media policy, and the practice and theory of journalism. Follow ACIJ investigations, news and events at Investigate.org.au. This report is available for your use under a creative commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) license, unless specifically noted. Feel free to quote, republish, backup, and move it to whatever platform works for you. Cover graphic: Global Annual Mean Surface Air Temperature Change, 1880 - 2012. Source: NASA GISS 2 Table of Contents 1. Preface . 5 2. Key Findings. 10 3. Background Issues . 28 4. Findings 4.1 Research design and methodology. 41 4.2 Quantity of climate science coverage .
    [Show full text]
  • 22. Gender and the 2013 Election: the Abbott 'Mandate'
    22. Gender and the 2013 Election: The Abbott ‘mandate’ Kirsty McLaren and Marian Sawer In the 2013 federal election, Tony Abbott was again wooing women voters with his relatively generous paid parental leave scheme and the constant sight of his wife and daughters on the campaign trail. Like Julia Gillard in 2010, Kevin Rudd was assuring voters that he was not someone to make an issue of gender and he failed to produce a women’s policy. Despite these attempts to neutralise gender it continued to be an undercurrent in the election, in part because of the preceding replacement of Australia’s first woman prime minister and in part because of campaigning around the gender implications of an Abbott victory. To evaluate the role of gender in the 2013 election, we draw together evidence on the campaign, campaign policies, the participation of women, the discursive positioning of male leaders and unofficial gender-based campaigning. We also apply a new international model of the dimensions of male dominance in the old democracies and the stages through which such dominance is overcome. We argue that, though feminist campaigning was a feature of the campaign, traditional views on gender remain powerful. Raising issues of gender equality, as Julia Gillard did in the latter part of her prime ministership, is perceived as electorally damaging, particularly among blue-collar voters. The prelude to the election Gender received most attention in the run-up to the election in 2012–13 rather than during the campaign itself. Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s famous misogyny speech of 2012 was prompted in immediate terms by the Leader of the Opposition drawing attention to sexism in what she perceived as a hypocritical way.
    [Show full text]
  • Timbuckleyieefa DIRTY POWER BIG COAL's NETWORK of INFLUENCE OVER the COALITION GOVERNMENT CONTENTS
    ICAC investigation: Lobbying, Access and Influence (Op Eclipse) Submission 2 From: Tim Buckley To: Lobbying Subject: THE REGULATION OF LOBBYING, ACCESS AND INFLUENCE IN NSW: A CHANCE TO HAVE YOUR SAY Date: Thursday, 16 May 2019 2:01:39 PM Attachments: Mav2019-GPAP-Dirtv-Power-Report.Ddf Good afternoon I am delighted that the NSW ICAC is looking again into the issue of lobbying and undue access by lobbyists representing self-serving, private special interest groups, and the associated lack of transparency. This is most needed when it relates to the private (often private, foreign tax haven based entities with zero transparency or accountability), use of public assets. IEEFA works in the public interest analysis relating to the energy-fmance-climate space, and so we regularly see the impact of the fossil fuel sector in particular as one that thrives on the ability to privatise the gains for utilising one-time use public assets and in doing so, externalising the costs onto the NSW community. This process is constantly repeated. The community costs, be they in relation to air, particulate and carbon pollution, plus the use of public water, and failure to rehabilitate sites post mining, brings a lasting community cost, particularly in the area of public health costs. The cost-benefit analysis presented to the IPC is prepared by the proponent, who has an ability to present biased self-serving analysis that understates the costs and overstates the benefits. To my understanding, the revolving door of regulators, politicians, fossil fuel companies and their lobbyists is corrosive to our democracy, undermining integrity and fairness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Implications of the 2016 Federal Election Anika Gauja, Peter Chen, Jennifer Curtin and Juliet Pietsch
    30 Conclusion: The Implications of the 2016 Federal Election Anika Gauja, Peter Chen, Jennifer Curtin and Juliet Pietsch In the year that the pollsters were stumped by unanticipated outcomes in both the Brexit vote and the United States (US) presidential election, the Australian polls got it close to right. Although Malcolm Turnbull had not campaigned particularly well and the party’s relentless mantras of ‘jobs and growth’ and ‘innovation’ were perceived as out of touch with the concerns of everyday Australians, the poll trends almost consistently put the Coalition one to two percentage points ahead of the Australian Labor Party (ALP). They predicted a close result in terms of the vote, which, in 2016, also translated into a close result in the number of seats won.1 With the parties within a few percentage points of one another, and the Liberal–National Coalition suffering a period of leadership and policy turmoil prior to the 2016 federal election, the circumstances going into the campaign did not present a reassuring scenario for stability. Would the federal election follow the 2014 Victorian and the 2015 Queensland State elections where questions of leadership (transition and style) were seen as definitive in the electoral losses for the incumbent Coalition governments? Or was the 2015 New South Wales (NSW) contest—where a new, young leader who consolidated the Coalition’s hold on government with an 1 This is not always the case. In 1998, the Coalition won 49 per cent of the vote and 80 seats out of 148. 681 DOUBLE DISILLUSION agenda for major infrastructure expenditure leveraged against economic rationalisation (asset sales, administrative reform)—a better indicator of what might occur? In other words, would the elevation of Turnbull, with his contrasting style and policy standpoints compared to Tony Abbott, result in an agenda for change and increased support within the electorate? In the end, neither scenario was borne out.
    [Show full text]
  • SIQ 37 Vol 16.Qxd DON:7 29/7/10 11:50 AM Page 1
    _7581 SIQ 37 Vol 16.qxd_DON:7 29/7/10 11:50 AM Page 1 ISSUE 37 JULY 2010 Memoirs and memory – GERARD HENDERSON on historical errors in the Simons- Fraser tome Helen Garner’s problem with fiction – PETER HAYES What’s happening to English - SHELLEY GARE on style and language STEPHEN MATCHETT and the Barack Obama (literary) industry ANNE HENDERSON searches for meaning from Christopher/Chris Hitchens ROSS FITZGERALD & STEPHEN HOLT – Doc Evatt revived JOHN MCCONNELL reviews the lives of Alan Reid and Nikki Savva PETE(R) STEEDMAN corresponds Vale JIM GRIFFIN MEDIA WATCH on leftist inner-city sandal wearers versus the people – Jon Faine, Brian Costar, Judith Brett, Catherine Deveny, Jill Singer, among others Published by The Sydney Institute 41 Phillip St. with Gerard Henderson’s Sydney 2000 Ph: (02) 9252 3366 MEDIA WATCH Fax: (02) 9252 3360 _7581 SIQ 37 Vol 16.qxd_DON:7 29/7/10 11:50 AM Page 2 The Sydney Institute Quarterly Issue 37, July 2010 CONTENTS MARK SCOTT - M.I.A. Soon after he was appointed managing director of the ABC in 2006, Mark Scott made a number of specific Editorial 2 commitments. He said he would ensure that the ABC presented a greater diversity of views on social and political Malcolm Fraser’s Memoirs - issues. He declared that the ABC TV Media Watch program The Fallibility of Memory would make it possible for those whom it criticised to have their views heard on the program itself. And he indicated - Gerard Henderson 3 that he would act in his position as ABC editor-in-chief in Adventures on the Road to Clarity addition to his role as ABC managing director.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Three May Contents
    The Sydney Institute Review Issue Three May Contents Book Reviews CHURCHILL AND HIS LOYAL AMERICANS 3 Citizens of London – The Americans Who Stood with Britain in its Darkest, Finest Hour By Lynne Olson Reviewed by Anne Henderson THE FALL OF TONY ABBOTT AS JACOBEAN DRAMA 7 The Road to Ruin: How Tony Abbott and Peta Credlin destroyed their own government by Niki Savva Credlin and Co: How the Abbott government destroyed itself by Aaron Patrick Reviewed by Stephen Matchett NOT JUST A FUNNY LADY – REMEMBERING NORA EPHRON 14 Nora Ephron: The Last Interview and Other Conversations Reviewed by Anne Henderson MURDER MOST FOUL: IN MELBOURNE & SYDNEY 16 Certain Admissions: A Beach, A Body and a Lifetime of Secrets By Gideon Haigh Kidnapped: The Crime that Stopped the Nation By Mark Tedeschi QC Reviewed by Gerard Henderson THE BIG BOYS FLY UP 21 Heartfelt Moments in Australian Rules Football edited by Ross Fitzgerald Reviewed by Paul Henderson Film & Stage Reviews DYSTOPIAN LEAPS WITH ALGORITHMS 24 Golem, Sydney Theatre Company Reviewed by Nathan Lentern A WISTFUL SENSE OF WHAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN 26 The Importance of Being Earnest: A Trivial Comedy for Serious People Reviewed by Nathan Lentern THE WITCH: A NEW ENGLAND FOLKTALE 28 Directed by Robert Eggers Reviewed by Paige Hally CHURCHILL AND HIS LOYAL AMERICANS Citizens of London – The Americans Who Stood with Britain in its Darkest, Finest Hour By Lynne Olson Scribe Publications 2015 ISBN-10: 1400067588 ISBN-13: 978-1400067589 RRP - $27.99 pb Reviewed by Anne Henderson In the UK spring of 1941, the Luftwaffe rained down bombs on a number of the UK’s industrial cities and ports, trying to sever Britain’s supplies and damage production.
    [Show full text]