1 Region 1 – Western US
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2020 Cape Cod Water Health Report and Action Plan Association to Preserve Cape Cod Website
State of the Waters: Cape Cod : 2020 Cape Cod Water Health Report, Action Plan and Atlas of Water Restoration Needs and Solutions State of the Waters: Cape Cod 2020 Cape Cod Water Health Report and Action Plan Association to Preserve Cape Cod Website: https://capecodwaters.org July 28, 2020 Prepared by: Andrew Gottlieb, Jo Ann Muramoto, Ph.D., Jordanne Feldman, Kristin Andres, Don Keeran and Kevin Johnson 1. Introduction The State of the Waters: Cape Cod is an annual assessment of the Cape’s water quality, designed to help you understand the water quality problems that we face and the actions that are needed to address these problems. The Association to Preserve Cape Cod (APCC) launched this project in 2019 in order to answer the question: “How healthy are Cape Cod’s waters?” This website is the place to find out about the Cape’s water quality and what can be done to address water pollution and achieve clean water. For this multi-year project, APCC collected existing data on water quality on Cape Cod for the purpose of determining the health of Cape Cod’s waters. APCC evaluated water quality in coastal waters (saltwater), freshwater ponds and lakes, and public drinking water supplies. APCC used existing methods to score water quality and used the scores to distinguish between degraded surface waters where immediate action is needed to improve water quality vs. surface waters with acceptable quality where ongoing protection is needed to avoid any decline in quality. The results are summarized in this annual water health report. To guide public action, APCC prepared a Water Action Plan that contains recommendations for changes in policies, actions, and regulations to improve and protect our waters. -
Webster, Dudley and the Oxfords
Mailed free to requesting homes in Webster, Dudley and the Oxfords 508-764-4325 Complimentary to homes by request ONLINE: WWW.WEBSTERTIMES.NET “We turn not older with years, but newer every day.” Friday, May 14, 2010 Budget decisions delayed at Town Meeting SIGNAGE BYLAW NIXED, PARK AVE. STUDY APPROVED BY JOY RICHARD working in the municipal field he of the type of sign a business could TIMES STAFF WRITER has never had to postpone a budget display on their store or automo- WEBSTER — With residents until now. biles, was removed from the war- packing the Bartlett Jr./Sr. High “This is the second year in a row rant altogether. School auditorium to capacity that [Webster] has been hit by the At a Board of Selectmen meeting Monday, May 10, voters had the decline in state aid,” said Monday, April 30, Party Planner chance to let their voices count dur- McAuliffe. “[Hopefully] in the next owner Daniel Marcoux said he and ing Annual Town Meeting. five weeks we will be able to get a the other business owners in the Of the two major articles of con- better sense of what legislators are community stood against the idea tention, only one had the chance to doing to bring municipal relief. We of the bylaw due to the fact that be voted on during the evening. want to bring some type of stability they thought it would drive away Article 2, which referred to the to the community.” potential businesses from settling town budget, was passed over to be After weeks of back and forth dis- in Webster. -
New York Freshwater Fishing Regulations Guide: 2015-16
NEW YORK Freshwater FISHING2015–16 OFFICIAL REGULATIONS GUIDE VOLUME 7, ISSUE NO. 1, APRIL 2015 Fishing for Muskie www.dec.ny.gov Most regulations are in effect April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR New York: A State of Angling Opportunity When it comes to freshwater fishing, no state in the nation can compare to New York. Our Great Lakes consistently deliver outstanding fishing for salmon and steelhead and it doesn’t stop there. In fact, New York is home to four of the Bassmaster’s top 50 bass lakes, drawing anglers from around the globe to come and experience great smallmouth and largemouth bass fishing. The crystal clear lakes and streams of the Adirondack and Catskill parks make New York home to the very best fly fishing east of the Rockies. Add abundant walleye, panfish, trout and trophy muskellunge and northern pike to the mix, and New York is clearly a state of angling opportunity. Fishing is a wonderful way to reconnect with the outdoors. Here in New York, we are working hard to make the sport more accessible and affordable to all. Over the past five years, we have invested more than $6 million, renovating existing boat launches and developing new ones across the state. This is in addition to the 50 new projects begun in 2014 that will make it easier for all outdoors enthusiasts to access the woods and waters of New York. Our 12 DEC fish hatcheries produce 900,000 pounds of fish each year to increase fish populations and expand and improve angling opportunities. -
WSP Report 2012
Watershed Stewardship Program Summary of Programs and Research 2012 Watershed Stewardship Program Report # AWI 2013-01 Executive Summary and Introduction 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary and Introduction........................................................................................................... 4 West-Central Adirondack Region Summary ............................................................................................... 17 Staff Profiles ................................................................................................................................................ 22 Chateaugay Lake Boat Launch Use Report ................................................................................................. 29 Cranberry Lake Boat Launch Use Study ...................................................................................................... 36 Fourth Lake Boat Launch Use Report ......................................................................................................... 45 Lake Flower and Second Pond Boat Launch Use Study .............................................................................. 58 Lake Placid State and Village Boat Launch Use Study ................................................................................. 72 Long Lake Boat Launch Use Study .............................................................................................................. 84 Meacham Lake Campground Boat Launch Use Study ............................................................................... -
Estimation of Potential Runoff-Contributing Areas in Kansas Using Topographic and Soil Information
Prepared in cooperation with the KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Estimation of Potential Runoff-Contributing Areas in Kansas Using Topographic and Soil Information Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4242 EXPLANATION Potential contributing area Boundary of major river basin Hiii Infiltration-excess overland flow only ^H Saturation-excess overland flow only - Subbasin boundary Hi Infiltration- and saturation-excess overland flows L I Noncontributing area U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Estimation of Potential Runoff Contributing Areas in Kansas Using Topographic and Soil Information By KYLE E. JURACEK Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4242 Prepared in cooperation with the KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT Lawrence, Kansas 1999 U.S. Department of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: U.S. Geological Survey District Chief Information Services U.S. Geological Survey Building 810, Federal Center 4821 Quail Crest Place Box 25286 Lawrence, KS 66049-3839 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract...........................................................................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................................^ -
Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10
Prepared in cooperation with the Kansas Water Office Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10 Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5187 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover. Upper left: Tuttle Creek Lake upstream from highway 16 bridge, May 16, 2011 (photograph by Dirk Hargadine, USGS). Lower right: Tuttle Creek Lake downstream from highway 16 bridge, May 16, 2011 (photograph by Dirk Hargadine, USGS). Note: On May 16, 2011, the water-surface elevation for Tuttle Creek Lake was 1,075.1 feet. The normal elevation for the multi-purpose pool of the reservoir is 1,075.0 feet. Back cover. Water-quality monitor in Little Blue River near Barnes, Kansas. Note active channel-bank erosion at upper right (photograph by Bill Holladay, USGS). Suspended-Sediment Loads, Reservoir Sediment Trap Efficiency, and Upstream and Downstream Channel Stability for Kanopolis and Tuttle Creek Lakes, Kansas, 2008–10 By Kyle E. Juracek Prepared in cooperation with the Kansas Water Office Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5187 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. -
Twin Cities Metropolitan Area
2020 Minnesota Congressional and Legislative Districts N.W. Angle Unorg St. St. Vincent Vincent Twp Clow Twp St. Joseph McKinley Caribou Humboldt Richardville Unorg Pohlitz Twp Twp Twp Dieter Twp Twp Northwest North Roseau Roseau Lake Twp ¤£75 KITTSON Unorg Unorg Warroad Hampden Poppleton ROSEAU Jadis Twp Hill Twp Lancaster Twp 1A Twp Cannon Twp Soler Twp Moose Twp Spruce Granville Twp Ross Twp Twp Beltrami Roseau Enstrom Cedarbend Moranville Twp Laona Twp Forest North Red Peatland Twp Twp Unorg Baudette River Hallock Unorg Unorg Baudette Unorg Percy Twp Unorg Hallock Badger Malung Roosevelt Twp Thompson Hazelton Polonia Twp Barto Twp Twp Twp Twp Lake Bronson Skagen Twp Falun Twp Williams Stokes Stafford Twp America / Twp Baudette Tegner Twp Beltrami Baudette Unorg Norway Twp Island Unorg Unorg Skane Twp Greenbush Baudette Jupiter Twp Barnett Twp Unorg Pelan Twp Dewey Twp South Red Kennedy Halma Hereim Twp Nereson Grimstad Baudette Twp Mickinock River Twp Twp Twp Beaver Twp Davis Twp Svea Twp £59 Beltrami Baudette ¤ Forest Unorg Spring Arveson Unorg Deerwood Twp Teien Twp Donaldson Brook Twp Twp Deer Twp Karlstad Huss Twp Poplar Palmville Twp Golden Lind Twp Grove Twp Valley Reine Twp Ranier Strathcona Twp Eagle Sinnott Twp Beltrami LAKE International Point Donnelly Twp Augsburg Lincoln Twp Twp Nelson Forest Falls Rainy Twp Park Twp East Huntly Twp Strandquist Park Twp Thief Unorg Lake Como Twp Moose OF THE Unorg Lake Twp River Twp Linsell Twp Beltrami Stephen WOODS Forest Wright Twp West New Maine Unorg Fork Valley Twp Middle Twp Parker Twp Tamarac Wanger Twp Twp River MARSHALL Twp Kabetogama Spruce Whiteford Valley Cedar Twp Rollis Twp Twp Twp Veldt Twp Bloomer Twp Twp Big Newfolden Woods Argyle Littlefork Twp Northwest Middle Alma Twp Foldahl Twp Marsh New Valley 7 Koochiching Northwest St. -
Freshwater Fishing: a Driver for Ecotourism
New York FRESHWATER April 2019 FISHINGDigest Fishing: A Sport For Everyone NY Fishing 101 page 10 A Female's Guide to Fishing page 30 A summary of 2019–2020 regulations and useful information for New York anglers www.dec.ny.gov Message from the Governor Freshwater Fishing: A Driver for Ecotourism New York State is committed to increasing and supporting a wide array of ecotourism initiatives, including freshwater fishing. Our approach is simple—we are strengthening our commitment to protect New York State’s vast natural resources while seeking compelling ways for people to enjoy the great outdoors in a socially and environmentally responsible manner. The result is sustainable economic activity based on a sincere appreciation of our state’s natural resources and the values they provide. We invite New Yorkers and visitors alike to enjoy our high-quality water resources. New York is blessed with fisheries resources across the state. Every day, we manage and protect these fisheries with an eye to the future. To date, New York has made substantial investments in our fishing access sites to ensure that boaters and anglers have safe and well-maintained parking areas, access points, and boat launch sites. In addition, we are currently investing an additional $3.2 million in waterway access in 2019, including: • New or renovated boat launch sites on Cayuga, Oneida, and Otisco lakes • Upgrades to existing launch sites on Cranberry Lake, Delaware River, Lake Placid, Lake Champlain, Lake Ontario, Chautauqua Lake and Fourth Lake. New York continues to improve and modernize our fish hatcheries. As Governor, I have committed $17 million to hatchery improvements. -
Mapping Known and Potential Karst Areas in the Northwest Territories, Canada
Mapping Known and Potential Karst Areas in the Northwest Territories, Canada Derek Ford, PGeo., PhD, FRSC. Emeritus Professor of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University [email protected] For: Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories August 2009 (i) Executive Summary The Goal of this Report is to Produce Maps of the Known and Potential Karst Landform Sites in the Northwest Territories (NWT) Karst landforms are those created by the dissolution of comparatively soluble rocks and the routing of the water (from rain or snowmelt) underground via caves rather than at the surface in river channels. The principal karst rocks are salt (so soluble that it is scarcely seen at the surface in the NWT), gypsum and anhydrite (solubility around 2500 mg/l of water), and limestone and dolomite (solubility around 250 -350 mg/l). All of these rock types are common and widespread amongst the sedimentary strata in the NWT. Surface karst landforms include: a) karren, which are spreads of individually small solution pits, shafts, and runnels that, collectively, may cover many hectares (limestone pavements); b) sinkholes of solutional, collapse, or other origin that can be tens to hundreds of metres in diameter and proportionally as deep. Sinkholes are considered the diagnostic karst landform worldwide; c) larger topographically closed depressions that may flood or drain seasonally, poljes if flat-floored, otherwise turloughs; d) extensive dry valleys and gorges, dry because their formative waters have been captured underground. All water sinking underground via karst landforms of all sizes drain quickly in comparison with all other types of groundwater because they are able to flow through solutionally enlarged conduits, termed caves where they are of enterable size. -
Selectmen Deny Planning Board's Request to Consult with Town Attorney
OUR PURPLE PROMISE We Only Charge • Pro Pics • Full Service 1.5% • Open Houses of Sale Price • MLS *Does Not include Buyer’s Agent Commission *Minimums Apply* gopurpleporch.com 1-508-439-7068 Located in Sturbridge Free by request to residents of Charlton, Charlton City and Charlton Depot SEND YOUR NEWS AND PICS TO [email protected] Friday, March 1, 2019 Selectmen deny planning board’s request to consult with town attorney BY JASON BLEAU Patricia Rydlak appeared interest. manner that could result in the assist them in the case. VILLAGER CORRESPONDENT before selectmen on Tuesday, The Open Meeting Law vio- Board of Selectmen standing in This is only the latest chap- Feb. 19 discussing a request for lations are connected to the violation the laws as well. The ter in an ongoing controversy CHARLTON – The Charlton the use of Town Council to help ongoing debate concerning the Planning Board expressed con- involving Valley Green Grow Board of Selectmen has denied the Planning Board address proposed Valley Green Grow cerns about a lack of legal rep- that has seen the Planning legal assistance to the town’s Open Meeting Law complaints project for Charlton Orchard, resentation in early February, Board and Board of Selectmen Planning Board as officials revealing that the board had an initiative that has grown as the deadline for a response to at odds and citizens debating work to resolve open meeting been denied legal represen- into a town-wide controversy the court approached, and also whether the proposed mari- law violation complaints, as tation. Rydlak said that the and led VGG to file an appeal urged the Board of Selectmen juana cultivation project can well as respond to the ongo- Planning Board was turned in Superior Court after the to meeting with the Planning or should be allowed on the ing litigation concerning the down because the town’s Planning Board denied them Board to discuss how to pro- Charlton Orchard property. -
1:100,000 1 Inch = 1.6 Miles Central Idaho-01
R 10 E R 11 E 115°7'30"W R 12 E 115°W R 13 E 114°52'30"W R 14 E 114°45'W R 15 E 114°37'30"W R 16 E 114°30'W R 17 E 114°22'30"W R 18 E S k i k e l v e Joe Jump Basin e Lookout Mountain k La e e r st e r r k C k e R C e h ee r C e e Little a Cr u Iron Cre k nce C l h r w Airport Rd e Car c C Central Idaho-01 e bo n an k B liv o t C nat e l e d e r u k i a r C e a g l C e F S r r e e e e S e C a M M C k e t s r a k o in a C a G o Creek s th rc in k i o m o e C Fire Suppression Constraints e S re C r k y e r k e e C m re e ek n m C e k i r r Alpine Peak o Ziegler Basin t Fish Critical Habitats T 10 N a C Observation Peak J e an s B g je T 10 N n d i Jimmy Smith Lake n v i ulch Bull Trout Critical Habitat a G r Hoodoo Lake L k rry k Creek ake Cree he G Big L Big Lake Creek 222 e Lake C Grandjean e Big Balsam Rd r k Trailer Lakes Regan, Mount C e Spawning Areas of Concern Little Redfish Lake e ry r S a C ek 222 F re Trail Creek Lakes d o o C n c rk l u r Resource Avoidance Area 36 P i 36 o a ra Big Lake Creek a Williams Peak B M ye T NF-214 Rd tte 31 31 36 31 31 36 31 Ri Cleveland Creek Safety Concerns ve 36 Wapiti Creek Rd r EAST FORK 36 S a l Suppression tactics Avoidance Area 01 Thompson Peak m o Railroad Ridge n Crater Lake 06 01 R Bluett Creek D Misc Resource Areas i ry 06 01 k v 01 01 06 06 Gu 01 06 k e e lc e re h e C r k r k k e Meadows, The C e oo re Watson Peak im Creek x Wilderness Area e hh C Iron Basin J o r Fis old Chinese Wall ek F C G re ti C Bluett Creek i Slate Creek r Retardant Avoidance Area p Gunsight Lake e a ld W ou B -
MDPH Beaches Annual Report 2008
Marine and Freshwater Beach Testing in Massachusetts Annual Report: 2008 Season Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health Environmental Toxicology Program http://www.mass.gov/dph/topics/beaches.htm July 2009 PART ONE: THE MDPH/BEH BEACHES PROJECT 3 I. Overview ......................................................................................................5 II. Background ..................................................................................................6 A. Beach Water Quality & Health: the need for testing......................................................... 6 B. Establishment of the MDPH/BEHP Beaches Project ....................................................... 6 III. Beach Water Quality Monitoring...................................................................8 A. Sample collection..............................................................................................................8 B. Sample analysis................................................................................................................9 1. The MDPH contract laboratory program ...................................................................... 9 2. The use of indicators .................................................................................................... 9 3. Enterococci................................................................................................................... 10 4. E. coli...........................................................................................................................