DOCSLIB.ORG

It's the Summer of 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
It's the Summer of 2017 It’s the Summer of 2017 - Do You Know Where Your Orcus Is? Discovered in 2004 and officially classified as a trans-Neptunian object (TNO) from our solar system’s outer, transformational edge (officially called the Kuiper Belt), Orcus carries the life- changing power of your oaths and vows. Sometimes called “the other Pluto,” his power is transformational. Although they’ve always been part of our reality, planets come “online” in our consciousness only when they’re discovered. To use the power of the edge-dwellers, we need to be able to hold and ground their energy. Because of Orcus’ importance at this eclipse -- and because the U.S. is beginning its Orcus return -- there’s never been a better time to know where your Orcus is. Tracking Orcus Through the Decades Orcus moves very slowly. It takes him about 20 years to move through a sign. As he moves from one sign to another, he spends a year “in transition” -- going back and forth between 28 and 29 degrees of the “old” sign and 0 and 1 degrees of the “new” one. May 25, 1933 - April 1, 1934 • Orcus was moving back and forth between 28 and 29 degrees Taurus and 0 and 1 degrees Gemini. • If your Orcus is in Taurus, your vows are ruled by the planet Venus -- what you want, and why. Venus’ sign and house position in your birth chart will be important factors in your relationship with your vows. • If your Orcus is in Gemini, your vows are ruled by the planet Mercury -- how you perceive reality, understand what you’re perceiving, and communicate with others. Mercury’s sign and house position in your birth chart will be important factors in your relationship with your vows. © Star Sister Astrology 2017 1 April 1, 1934 - July 17, 1953 • Orcus was in Gemini, ruled by the planet Mercury (see above). July 17, 1953 - May 31, 1954 • Orcus was moving back and forth between 28-29 degrees Gemini and 0-1 degrees Cancer. • If your Orcus is in Cancer, your vows are ruled by the Moon -- your emotional reality and the early childhood experiences -- especially in, your relationship with your mother-- that shaped it. The Moon’s sign and house position in your birth chart will be important factors in your relationship with your vows. May 31, 1954 - Oct 8, 1978 • Orcus was in Cancer, ruled by the Moon (see above). Oct 8, 1978 - August 12, 1979 • Orcus was moving back and forth between 28-29 degrees Leo and 0-1 degrees Leo. • If your Orcus is in Leo, your vows are ruled by the Sun -- your heart essence, your creative will, your relationship with your father. The Moon’s sign and house position in your birth chart will be important factors in your relationship with your vows. August 12, 1979 - September 19, 2008 • Orcus was in Leo. Sept 19 2008 - after September 2036 (Orcus ephemeris ends) • Orcus was moving back and forth between 28-29 degrees Leo and 0-1 degrees Virgo. • If your Orcus is in Virgo, your vows are ruled by Mercury-- how you perceive reality, understand what you’re perceiving, and communicate with others. Mercury’s sign and • house position in your birth chart will be important factors in your relationship with your vows. © Star Sister Astrology 2017 2 August 7, 2009 - November 13, 2039 (this is where the Orcus ephemeris ends, with Orcus at 29 degrees 28 minutes of Virgo) • Orcus was in Virgo, ruled by Mercury (see above). How To Find the Exact Degree of Your Orcus • Look up your birth date in the Orcus ephemeris (http://www.astro.com/swisseph/2004dw.htm). The degrees are listed in five-day intervals, so to figure exactly you’ll need to do a little math. • Calculate your birth chart on www.astro.com as shown in the video in “The Power of Vows” Resource Page, “How to Calculate Your Birth Chart.” Type in 90482 (Orcus’ astrological number) in the “Additional Objects” bar at the bottom of the chart selection page. © Star Sister Astrology 2017 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Underworld Radcliffe .G Edmonds III Bryn Mawr College, [email protected]
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College Greek, Latin, and Classical Studies Faculty Research Greek, Latin, and Classical Studies and Scholarship 2018 Underworld Radcliffe .G Edmonds III Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.brynmawr.edu/classics_pubs Part of the Classics Commons Custom Citation Edmonds, Radcliffe .,G III. 2019. "Underworld." In Oxford Classical Dictionary. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/classics_pubs/123 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Underworld Radcliffe G. Edmonds III In Oxford Classical Dictionary, in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Classics. (Oxford University Press. April 2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.8062 Summary Depictions of the underworld, in ancient Greek and Roman textual and visual sources, differ significantly from source to source, but they all draw on a common pool of traditional mythic motifs. These motifs, such as the realm of Hades and its denizens, the rivers of the underworld, the paradise of the blessed dead, and the places of punishment for the wicked, are developed and transformed through all their uses throughout the ages, depending upon the aims of the author or artist depicting the underworld. Some sources explore the relation of the world of the living to that of the dead through descriptions of the location of the underworld and the difficulties of entering it. By contrast, discussions of the regions within the underworld and existence therein often relate to ideas of afterlife as a continuation of or compensation for life in the world above.
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury (Mythology) 1 Mercury (Mythology)
    Mercury (mythology) 1 Mercury (mythology) Silver statuette of Mercury, a Berthouville treasure. Ancient Roman religion Practices and beliefs Imperial cult · festivals · ludi mystery religions · funerals temples · auspice · sacrifice votum · libation · lectisternium Priesthoods College of Pontiffs · Augur Vestal Virgins · Flamen · Fetial Epulones · Arval Brethren Quindecimviri sacris faciundis Dii Consentes Jupiter · Juno · Neptune · Minerva Mars · Venus · Apollo · Diana Vulcan · Vesta · Mercury · Ceres Mercury (mythology) 2 Other deities Janus · Quirinus · Saturn · Hercules · Faunus · Priapus Liber · Bona Dea · Ops Chthonic deities: Proserpina · Dis Pater · Orcus · Di Manes Domestic and local deities: Lares · Di Penates · Genius Hellenistic deities: Sol Invictus · Magna Mater · Isis · Mithras Deified emperors: Divus Julius · Divus Augustus See also List of Roman deities Related topics Roman mythology Glossary of ancient Roman religion Religion in ancient Greece Etruscan religion Gallo-Roman religion Decline of Hellenistic polytheism Mercury ( /ˈmɜrkjʉri/; Latin: Mercurius listen) was a messenger,[1] and a god of trade, the son of Maia Maiestas and Jupiter in Roman mythology. His name is related to the Latin word merx ("merchandise"; compare merchant, commerce, etc.), mercari (to trade), and merces (wages).[2] In his earliest forms, he appears to have been related to the Etruscan deity Turms, but most of his characteristics and mythology were borrowed from the analogous Greek deity, Hermes. Latin writers rewrote Hermes' myths and substituted his name with that of Mercury. However, there are at least two myths that involve Mercury that are Roman in origin. In Virgil's Aeneid, Mercury reminds Aeneas of his mission to found the city of Rome. In Ovid's Fasti, Mercury is assigned to escort the nymph Larunda to the underworld.
    [Show full text]
  • (90377) SEDNA and (90482) ORCUS1 Chadwick A
    The Astrophysical Journal, 627:1057–1065, 2005 July 10 # 2005. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. NEAR-INFRARED SURFACE PROPERTIES OF THE TWO INTRINSICALLY BRIGHTEST MINOR PLANETS: (90377) SEDNA AND (90482) ORCUS1 Chadwick A. Trujillo Gemini Observatory, Northern Operations Center, 670 North A’ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720; [email protected] Michael E. Brown California Institute of Technology, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, MS 150-21, Pasadena, CA 91125; [email protected] David L. Rabinowitz Physics Department, Yale Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Yale University, P.O. Box 208121, New Haven, CT 06520-8121; [email protected] and Thomas R. Geballe Gemini Observatory, Northern Operations Center, 670 North A’ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720; [email protected] Received 2004 March 26; accepted 2005 March 16 ABSTRACT We present low-resolution K-band spectra taken at the Gemini 8 m telescope of (90377) Sedna and (90482) Orcus (provisional designations 2003 VB12 and 2004 DW, respectively), currently the two minor planets with the greatest absolute magnitudes (i.e., the two most reflective minor planets). We place crude limits on the surface composition of these two bodies using a Hapke model for a wide variety of assumed albedos. The unusual minor planet Sedna was discovered on UT 2003 November 14 at roughly 90 AU, with 1.6 times the heliocentric and perihelion dis- tances of any other bound minor planet. It is the first solar system object discovered between the Kuiper Belt and the Oort Cloud and may represent a transition population between the two.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Irrelevance of Being a PLUTO! Size Scale of Stars and Planets
    On the irrelevance of being a PLUTO! Mayank Vahia DAA, TIFR Irrelevance of being Pluto 1 Size Scale of Stars and Planets Irrelevance of being Pluto 2 1 1 AU 700 Dsun Irrelevance of being Pluto 3 16 Dsun Irrelevance of being Pluto 4 2 Solar System 109 DEarth Irrelevance of being Pluto 5 11 DEarth Venus Irrelevance of being Pluto 6 3 Irrelevance of being Pluto 7 Solar System visible to unaided eye Irrelevance of being Pluto 8 4 Solar System at the beginning of 20 th Century Irrelevance of being Pluto 9 Solar System of my text book (30 years ago) Irrelevance of being Pluto 10 5 Asteroid Belt (Discovered in 1977) Irrelevance of being Pluto 11 The ‘Planet’ Pluto • Pluto is a 14 th magnitude object. • It is NOT visible to naked eye (neither are Uranus and Neptune). • It was discovered by American astronomer Clyde Tombaugh in 1930. Irrelevance of being Pluto 12 6 Prediction of Pluto • Percival Lowell and William H. Pickering are credited with the theoretical work on Pluto’s orbit done in 1909 based on data of Neptune’s orbital changes. • Venkatesh Ketakar had predicted it in May 1911 issue of Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of France. • He modelled his computations after those of Pierre-Simon Laplace who had analysed the motions of the satellites of Jupiter. • His location was within 1 o of its correct location. • He had predicted ts orbital period was 242.28 (248) years and a distance of 38.95 (39.53) A.U. • He had also predicted another planet at 59.573 A.U.
    [Show full text]
  • Tnos Mueller
    TNOs are Cool: A Survey of the Transneptunian Region Thomas M¨uller& The TNOs-are-Cool Team MPE Garching (37 members, 19 institutes, 9 countries) 1 Thomas M¨uller TNOs are Cool! • OT KP with 370 hours Overview • PACS and SPIRE photometric point-source observations • characterisation of about 140 Trans-Neptunian Objects (with known orbits) • target with a few mJy up to 400 mJy • Key element: highly reliable photometric ac- curacy in 3 (6) bands • time-critical observations with follow-on constraint (confusion noise) 2 Science Goals in a Nut Shell • Radiometric size and albedo solutions - accurate sizes (! volumes) of TNOs ! primordial (D> 200 km) size distribution - accurate spectroscopic and polarimetric modeling - albedo vs Size vs Colour vs Composition vs Orbit vs Binarity vs ... ! probe formation and evolution processes • Thermophysical properties (from 3 to 6 Pacs/Spire bands) - temperatures & thermal inertia ! ice vs rock surface, surface type - emissivity ! grain size information - beaming parameter ! surface roughness • Binary densities: mass from Ke- • Thermal lightcurves pler's 3rd law, volume from Herschel ! disentangle albedo/shape ! basic geophysical parameter ! spin-axis orientation ! interior structure/composition ! thermal inertia ! binary formation mechanism ! large surface structures 3 Thomas M¨uller TNOs are Cool! Herschel Study of the Kuiperbelt & TNOs: ! a benchmark for understanding the solar system debris disk, and extra-solar ones as well! M¨uller et al. 2009, Earth, Moon & Planet 105, 209-219 4 Thomas M¨uller TNOs
    [Show full text]
  • Poetic Portraits of Aeneas As Political Commentaries on Augustus
    Honors Program Honors Program Theses University of Puget Sound Year 2015 Dum conderet urbem: Poetic Portraits of Aeneas as Political Commentaries on Augustus Alicia Matz [email protected] This paper is posted at Sound Ideas. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/honors program theses/12 Dum conderet urbem: Poetic Portraits of Aeneas as Political Commentaries on Augustus Alicia Matz University of Puget Sound Director: Aislinn Melchior, Associate Professor and Chair, Classics Reader: Eric Orlin, Professor, Classics Matz 1 Many ancient authors believed that Vergil’s Aeneas was the epitome of a good man. One such author, Tiberius Claudius Donatus, wrote a commentary, published in the fourth century CE, which includes about one hundred pages of paraphrase per book of the Aeneid. Writing in order “to help his son read the Aeneid ” (Starr 26), the very first thing Donatus sets about explaining is the kind of work that Vergil wrote: Primum igitur et ante omnia sciendum est quod materiae genus Maro noster adgressus sit; hoc enim nisi inter initia fuerit cognitum, vehementer errabitur. et certe laudativum est… ( “First therefore also before everything it must be known what kind of material our Maro undertook; for unless this is understood amongst the beginnings, it will vehemently be in error. And certainly it is laudatory…,” Donatus 1.2.7-10).1 Not wanting his son to be confused, at the outset he wants to make sure that he knows that the main genre of the Aeneid is praise, and as a result of this “Vergil’s basic goal is to praise Aeneas and, therefore, Augustus” (Starr 29).
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/23/2021 03:29:23PM Via Free Access 298 Daniels
    chapter 11 Sacred Exchange: The Religious Institutions of Emporia in the Mediterranean World of the Later Iron Age Megan Daniels Introduction The Mediterranean Iron Age, while it is difficult to pinpoint its exact bound- aries temporarily,1 has as one of its hallmarks the proliferation of long-distance trade networks. The development of these networks led to the movement of peoples overseas to capitalize upon trade opportunities while at the same time establishing more permanent settlements around the Mediterranean. Overall, the Iron Age, particularly between the eighth and sixth centuries bce, is seen as a time of major economic accomplishment in terms of the novel economic structures that were created, allowing for a density of intercommunications supported by regular and frequent movement of goods and people.2 I wish to focus on these novel economic structures in particular in this paper, specifi- cally the institutions that developed out of and in turn spurred such prolific movements. While difficult to reconstruct out of fragmentary evidence, insti- tutions were vital in allowing human beings the means to cooperate with one another and thus to capture the gains made by commercial activities. Corre- spondingly, an investigation of Iron Age institutions is vital for explaining rising standards of living and population growth across the Mediterranean world at this time. 1 The term “Iron Age” lacks fixed boundaries—Near Eastern and Greek archaeologists tend to see it as commencing in the twelfth and eleventh centuries bce, following the collapse of Bronze Age palatial centres and the migration of the so-called Sea Peoples. On the other hand, on Sicily, the Iron Age does not begin until the ninth century, with shifts from chiefdoms to more egalitarian communities, while in North Africa the Iron Age is seen to commence with the founding of Carthage.
    [Show full text]
  • Integral-Field Spectroscopy of (90482) Orcus-Vanth
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. main c ESO 2018 August 1, 2018 Integral-field spectroscopy of (90482) Orcus-Vanth⋆ Benoˆıt Carry1,2,3, Daniel Hestroffer4, Francesca E. DeMeo2,5, Audrey Thirouin6, J´erˆome Berthier4, Pedro Lacerda7, Bruno Sicardy2,8,9, Alain Doressoundiram2, Christophe Dumas10, David Farrelly11, and Thomas G. M¨uller12 1 European Space Astronomy Centre, ESA, P.O. Box 78, 28691 Villanueva de la Ca˜nada, Madrid, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 2 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92190 Meudon, France 3 Universit´eParis 7 Denis-Diderot, 5 rue Thomas Mann, 75205 Paris CEDEX, France 4 IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, UPMC, CNRS, 77 av. Denfert Rochereau 75014 Paris, France 5 Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 6 Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Andaluc´ıa, CSIC, Apt 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain 7 Queen’s University, Belfast, County Antrim BT7 1NN, Ireland 8 Universit´ePierre et Marie Curie, 4, Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris cedex 5, France 9 Institut Universitaire de France, 103, Bld Saint Michel, 75005 Paris, France 10 Alonso de C´ordova 3107, Vitacura, Casilla 19001, Santiago de Chile, Chile 11 Utah State University, 0300 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322, USA 12 Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur extraterrestrische Physik (MPE), Giessenbachstrasse, 85748 Garching, Germany Received ; accepted ABSTRACT Aims. We seek to constrain the surface composition of the Trans-Neptunian Object (90482) Orcus and its small satellite Vanth, as well as their mass and density. Methods. We acquired near-infrared spectra (1.4–2.4 µm) of (90482) Orcus and its companion Vanth using the adaptive-optics-fed integral-field spectrograph SINFONI mounted on Yepun/UT4 at the European Southern Observatory Very Large Telescope.
    [Show full text]
  • For a Falcon
    New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology Introduction by Robert Graves CRESCENT BOOKS NEW YORK New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology Translated by Richard Aldington and Delano Ames and revised by a panel of editorial advisers from the Larousse Mvthologie Generate edited by Felix Guirand and first published in France by Auge, Gillon, Hollier-Larousse, Moreau et Cie, the Librairie Larousse, Paris This 1987 edition published by Crescent Books, distributed by: Crown Publishers, Inc., 225 Park Avenue South New York, New York 10003 Copyright 1959 The Hamlyn Publishing Group Limited New edition 1968 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the permission of The Hamlyn Publishing Group Limited. ISBN 0-517-00404-6 Printed in Yugoslavia Scan begun 20 November 2001 Ended (at this point Goddess knows when) LaRousse Encyclopedia of Mythology Introduction by Robert Graves Perseus and Medusa With Athene's assistance, the hero has just slain the Gorgon Medusa with a bronze harpe, or curved sword given him by Hermes and now, seated on the back of Pegasus who has just sprung from her bleeding neck and holding her decapitated head in his right hand, he turns watch her two sisters who are persuing him in fury. Beneath him kneels the headless body of the Gorgon with her arms and golden wings outstretched. From her neck emerges Chrysor, father of the monster Geryon. Perseus later presented the Gorgon's head to Athene who placed it on Her shield.
    [Show full text]
  • Prerequisites for Explosive Cryovolcanism on Dwarf Planet-Class Kuiper Belt Objects ⇑ M
    Icarus 246 (2015) 48–64 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Prerequisites for explosive cryovolcanism on dwarf planet-class Kuiper belt objects ⇑ M. Neveu a, , S.J. Desch a, E.L. Shock a,b, C.R. Glein c a School of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404, USA b Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404, USA c Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Rd. NW, Washington, DC 20015, USA article info abstract Article history: Explosive extrusion of cold material from the interior of icy bodies, or cryovolcanism, has been observed Received 30 December 2013 on Enceladus and, perhaps, Europa, Triton, and Ceres. It may explain the observed evidence for a young Revised 21 March 2014 surface on Charon (Pluto’s surface is masked by frosts). Here, we evaluate prerequisites for cryovolcanism Accepted 25 March 2014 on dwarf planet-class Kuiper belt objects (KBOs). We first review the likely spatial and temporal extent of Available online 5 April 2014 subsurface liquid, proposed mechanisms to overcome the negative buoyancy of liquid water in ice, and the volatile inventory of KBOs. We then present a new geochemical equilibrium model for volatile exso- Keywords: lution and its ability to drive upward crack propagation. This novel approach bridges geophysics and geo- Charon chemistry, and extends geochemical modeling to the seldom-explored realm of liquid water at subzero Interiors Pluto temperatures. We show that carbon monoxide (CO) is a key volatile for gas-driven fluid ascent; whereas Satellites, formation CO2 and sulfur gases only play a minor role.
    [Show full text]
  • The Surface of the Transneptunian Object 90482 Orcus
    A&A 437, 1115–1120 (2005) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20042533 & c ESO 2005 Astrophysics The surface of the transneptunian object 90482 Orcus C. de Bergh1, A. Delsanti1,2,G.P.Tozzi3,E.Dotto4, A. Doressoundiram1, and M. A. Barucci1, 1 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute for Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA 3 INAF – Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Largo E. Fermi 5, 50125 Firenze, Italy 4 INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, via Frascati 33, 00040 Monteporzio Catone (Roma), Italy Received 14 December 2004 / Accepted 11 March 2005 Abstract. In April 2004, we obtained visible and near-infrared spectroscopy and photometry of the Transneptunian Object (TNO) 90482 Orcus (2004 DW) with the European Southern Observatory (ESO) 8-m telescopes of the Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile. This object, discovered on February 17, 2004, is one of the largest known TNOs, and it belongs to the dynamical class of Plutinos. The high signal-to-noise ratio visible spectrum recorded on April 11, 2004, is nearly flat, in good agreement with the BVRI photometry we obtained the same night and with photometric measurements from Rabinowitz et al. (2004, IAU Circ., 8295). The near-infrared spectra (J, H,andK bands) were obtained on April 11, 12, and 21, 2004. Relatively strong absorptions attributed to water ice were detected around 1.5 and 2 µm. We compare these data with spectra of Orcus obtained at the 3.56-m Telescopio Nazionale Galileo (TNG) by Fornasier et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Surveys of the Kuiper Belt 573
    Trujillo: Future Surveys of the Kuiper Belt 573 Future Surveys of the Kuiper Belt Chadwick A. Trujillo Gemini North Observatory The next decade of Kuiper belt object (KBO) science will be completely dominated by the output of two surveys. These two surveys, the Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), will increase the total number of known KBOs by factors of 25 to 150 over the next decade. This discovery rate will not be uniform — it will come as a large flood of information during the first year of operation. If software development allows, additional depth may be gained in successive years if data can be combined across years to find bodies that are too faint to be detected in an individual visit. Not only will the surveys increase the number of objects dramatically, but they will also be sensitive to heliocentric distances far beyond 100 AU due to their multiyear survey methodology. In this work, we outline a basic timeline of operation of these two powerful surveys and the science that will be enabled by their data output, as well as other significant advances in KBO surveys expected in the next decade. 1. INTRODUCTION de Bergh et al., 2005; Cruikshank et al., 2005; Stern, 2005; Trujillo et al., 2005; Gaudi et al., 2005; Brown et al., 2005; The coming decade should see a dramatic increase in our Matese et al., 2005; Doressoundiram et al., 2005; Licandro knowledge of the Kuiper belt object (KBO) population due et al., 2006; Rabinowitz et al., 2006; Barkume et al., 2006; entirely to new telescopic survey experiments.
    [Show full text]