Notornis Has Met All the Our Constant Companion for the Past 13 Years, Our Black Labrador, Requirements and That It Has Been Accepted for Inclusion in the Peat
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
KEY of ABBREVIATIONS a 1-10, A= C10-15, A
HERITAGE EXPEDITIONS SECRETS OF MELANESIA #1959 24 October - 4 November 2019 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9 Day 10 Day 11 Day 12 Day 13 Day 14 Day 15 Day 16 Day 17 Day 18 Day 19 Day 20 Day 21 Day 22 Day 23 Day 24 Day 25 Day 26 Day 27 Day 28 Day 29 Day 30 Species Area of Occurrence MELANESIAN MEGAPODE 1 PNG H 1 H KEY OF ABBREVIATIONS Megapodius eremita VANUATU MEGAPODE 2 VAN 1 Megapodius layardi A 1-10, A= c10-15, A- about 15-30, A+ c80-100, PACIFIC BLACK DUCK 3 PNG B 10-100, B= more than a hundred, Anas superciliosa B- low hundreds, C 100-1000, C- low thousands, SPOTTED WHISTLING DUCK 4 Dendrocygna guttata C+ high thousands, D tens of thousands (i.e. 10,000- WANDERING WHISTLING DUCK 100,000), D= more than ten thousand, D- low tens of 5 PNG Dendrocygna arcuata thousands, D+ high tens of thousands, E hundreds of RADJAH SHELDUCK 6 Tadorna radjah thousands (i.e. 100,000-1,000,000), H Heard Only VANUATU PETREL 7 VAN Pterodroma occulta MAGNIFICENT PETREL 8 VAN 2 Pterodroma (brevipes) magnificens COLLARD PETREL 9 VAN Pterodroma brevipes TAHITI PETREL 10 R 1 Pseudobulweria rostrata BECK'S PETREL 11 PNG Pseudobulweria becki STREAKED SHEARWATER 12 PNG Calonectris leucomelas CHRISTMAS SHEARWATER 13 R Puffinus nativitatis WEDGE-TAILED SHEARWATER 14 R A A 3 Puffinus pacificus TROPICAL SHEARWATER 15 R Puffinus balloni HEINROTH'S SHEARWATER 16 PNG, SOL 1 Puffinus heinrothi SHORT-TAILED SHEARWATER 17 R Puffinus tenuirostris FLESH-FOOTED SHEARWATER 18 R Puffinus carneipes BULWER'S PETREL 19 R Bulweria bulwerii WILSON'S STORM-PETREL -
The Solomon Islands
THE SOLOMON ISLANDS 14 SEPTEMBER – 7 OCTOBER 2007 TOUR REPORT LEADER: MARK VAN BEIRS Rain, mud, sweat, steep mountains, shy, skulky birds, shaky logistics and an airline with a dubious reputation, that is what the Solomon Islands tour is all about, but these forgotten islands in the southwest Pacific also hold some very rarely observed birds that very few birders will ever have the privilege to add to their lifelist. Birdquest’s fourth tour to the Solomons went without a hiccup. Solomon Airlines did a great job and never let us down, it rained regularly and we cursed quite a bit on the steep mountain trails, but the birds were out of this world. We birded the islands of Guadalcanal, Rennell, Gizo and Malaita by road, cruised into Ranongga and Vella Lavella by boat, and trekked up into the mountains of Kolombangara, Makira and Santa Isabel. The bird of the tour was the incredible and truly bizarre Solomon Islands Frogmouth that posed so very, very well for us. The fantastic series of endemics ranged from Solomon Sea Eagles, through the many pigeons and doves - including scope views of the very rare Yellow-legged Pigeon and the bizarre Crested Cuckoo- Dove - and parrots, from cockatoos to pygmy parrots, to a biogeographer’s dream array of myzomelas, monarchs and white-eyes. A total of 146 species were seen (and another 5 heard) and included most of the available endemics, but we also enjoyed a close insight into the lifestyle and culture of this traditional Pacific country, and into the complex geography of the beautiful forests and islet-studded reefs. -
Beak and Feather Disease Viru
Fact sheet Beak and feather disease virus (BFDV) is the causative agent of psittacine beak and feather disease (PBFD), an endemic disease in Australia’s wild parrot populations. Descriptions of parrots with feather loss consistent with the disease date back to the late 1800s (Ashby 1907). The virus is believed to have originated in Australia sometime following the separation of the continent from Gondwanaland, with spread to other parts of the world with modern movement of parrots as pet and aviary species . It has the potential to impact on several endangered Australian and non-Australian parrot populations and is listed as a key threatening process by the Australian government. Of late, the virus also has been identified in various non-psittacine species . Beak and feather disease virus is a 14 to 16 nm non-enveloped icosahedral DNA virus belonging to the family Circoviridae. Formerly, it was believed that the circoviruses recovered from a diverse range of psittacines were all antigenically similar. Doubt was cast on this theory when a virus that appeared to be serologically and genetically different was isolated from cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) (Shearer et al. 2008). More recent research appears to indicate that psittacine circoviruses can be divided into two species and multiple viral strains. Based on work by Varsani et al. (2011), BFDV contains 14 strains, while budgerigar circovirus (BCV), a newly defined species to date only found in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates), contains three strains. However, it is likely that this number will continue to increase as shown by the discovery of two new distinct BFDV lineages in orange-bellied parrots (Neophema chrysogaster) (Peters et al. -
Improving Knowledge for the Captive Rearing Practice of South Island Kiwi (Apteryx Haastii, A
Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Improving knowledge for the captive rearing practice of South Island kiwi (Apteryx haastii, A. mantelli ‘Haast’ and A. rowi) __________________________________ A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science at Lincoln University by Sarah T. Forder _______________________________ Lincoln University 2014 Abstract of a thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Master of Science. Improving knowledge for the captive rearing practice of South Island kiwi (Apteryx haastii, A. mantelli ‘Haast’ and A. rowi) by Sarah Forder Kiwi species, once abundant throughout New Zealand, are now confined to remnant forest patches, national parks and security sites on offshore islands. On average 94% of young kiwi are killed before they reach 100 days old largely due to predation by stoats (Mustela erminea). In order to combat the decline of kiwi, Operation Nest Egg (ONE) began in the mid 1990's; this program involved the removal of wild kiwi eggs to be reared in captivity and then released to the wild as older juveniles with an improved chance of survival. -
Normal Template
BIODIVERSITY SUBCONTRACTOR’S CI MANAGEMENT PLAN TINA RIVER HYDROPOWER HEC-CDSB-CEMSP-PPP- PAGE REV. 5 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 002 1 OF 132 Biodiversity Management Plan HEC HSE Manager and THL E&S Person Responsible Manager DATE REV. DESCRIPTION PREPARED CHECKED APPROVED (dd/mm/yyyy) Version 1 issued for Lender’s 1 31/12/2019 HEC HEC review 2 02/05/2020 Version 2 issued for OE’s HEC Review Version 2 issued for Lenders’ 3 02/06/2020 HEC OE (JG) Review – Access Road Lot 1 Version 3 issued for Lenders’ OE (PF, KS, 4 17/09/2020 OE(JG) Review – Access Road JG) Version 3 resubmitted for OE (PF, KS, 5 13/11/2020 Lenders’ approval (Access OE(JG) JG) Road) BIODIVERSITY SUBCONTRACTOR’S CI MANAGEMENT PLAN TINA RIVER HYDROPOWER HEC-CDSB-CEMSP-PPP- PAGE REV. 5 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 002 2 OF 132 Revision Log Date Revised Detail Rev. (dd/mm/yyyy) Item Page Article Description BIODIVERSITY SUBCONTRACTOR’S CI MANAGEMENT PLAN TINA RIVER HYDROPOWER HEC-CDSB-CEMSP-PPP- PAGE REV. 5 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT 002 3 OF 132 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 8 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 8 1.2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 10 1.3 MANAGEMENT APPROACH 11 1.3.1 Adaptive Management 11 1.3.2 Ecosystem Approach 14 1.3.3 Four BMP Elements 14 1.3.4 Biodiversity Capacity Support and Stakeholder Engagement 15 1.4 UPDATES 16 1.5 DEFINITIONS 16 2 BACKGROUND TO THE PROJECT 18 3 ECOLOGICAL STUDIES UNDERTAKEN 19 4 BIODIVERSITY CONTEXT 21 4.1 REGIONAL BIODIVERSITY CONTEXT 21 4.2 LOCAL BIODIVERSITY CONTEXT 22 4.2.1 Terrestrial Ecology 23 4.2.2 Aquatic Ecology 27 5 EXISTING PRESSURES ON LOCAL BIODIVERSITY 29 5.1 CLEARING -
Birding Oxley Creek Common Brisbane, Australia
Birding Oxley Creek Common Brisbane, Australia Hugh Possingham and Mat Gilfedder – January 2011 [email protected] www.ecology.uq.edu.au 3379 9388 (h) Other photos, records and comments contributed by: Cathy Gilfedder, Mike Bennett, David Niland, Mark Roberts, Pete Kyne, Conrad Hoskin, Chris Sanderson, Angela Wardell-Johnson, Denis Mollison. This guide provides information about the birds, and how to bird on, Oxley Creek Common. This is a public park (access restricted to the yellow parts of the map, page 6). Over 185 species have been recorded on Oxley Creek Common in the last 83 years, making it one of the best birding spots in Brisbane. This guide is complimented by a full annotated list of the species seen in, or from, the Common. How to get there Oxley Creek Common is in the suburb of Rocklea and is well signposted from Sherwood Road. If approaching from the east (Ipswich Road side), pass the Rocklea Markets and turn left before the bridge crossing Oxley Creek. If approaching from the west (Sherwood side) turn right about 100 m after the bridge over Oxley Creek. The gate is always open. Amenities The main development at Oxley Creek Common is the Red Shed, which is beside the car park (plenty of space). The Red Shed has toilets (composting), water, covered seating, and BBQ facilities. The toilets close about 8pm and open very early. The paths are flat, wide and easy to walk or cycle. When to arrive The diversity of waterbirds is a feature of the Common and these can be good at any time of the day. -
New Zealand Dotterel (Charadrius Obscurus) Recovery Plan, 2004–14
New Zealand dotterel (Charadrius obscurus) recovery plan, 2004–14 John E. Dowding and Alison M. Davis THREATENED SPECIES RECOVERY PLAN 58 Published by Science & Technical Publishing Department of Conservation PO Box 10420, The Terrace Wellington 6143, New Zealand Cover: Northern New Zealand dotterel at nest, Whitianga. Photo: Copyright J.E. Dowding (1991). Individual copies of Threatened Species Recovery Plans are printed, and are also available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science & technical. © Copyright January 2007, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1170–3806 ISBN 0–478–14145–9 This report was prepared for publication by Science & Technical Publishing; editing and layout by Amanda Todd. Publication was approved by the Chief Scientist (Research, Development & Improvement Division), Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. When printing, recycled paper is used wherever possible. Contents Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Plan term and review date 6 3. Context 7 3.1 Overview of species 7 3.1.1 Species ecology and biology 7 3.1.2 Status and threat categories 7 3.1.3 Past and present distribution 8 3.1.4 Agents of decline and threats 8 3.1.5 Past and current management and research 8 3.1.6 Preferred option for recovery 9 3.2 Strategic directives 10 3.3 Cultural importance 10 3.4 Public awareness 11 4. Goals 11 4.1 Long-term recovery goals 11 4.2 Goals for the term of this plan 11 4.2.1 Management 11 4.2.2 Community relations 12 4.2.3 Research 12 5. -
Miocene Mammal Reveals a Mesozoic Ghost Lineage on Insular New Zealand, Southwest Pacific
Miocene mammal reveals a Mesozoic ghost lineage on insular New Zealand, southwest Pacific Trevor H. Worthy*†, Alan J. D. Tennyson‡, Michael Archer§, Anne M. Musser¶, Suzanne J. Hand§, Craig Jonesʈ, Barry J. Douglas**, James A. McNamara††, and Robin M. D. Beck§ *School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Darling Building DP 418, Adelaide University, North Terrace, Adelaide 5005, South Australia, Australia; ‡Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, P.O. Box 467, Wellington 6015, New Zealand; §School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, New South Wales 2052, Australia; ¶Australian Museum, 6-8 College Street, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia; ʈInstitute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, P.O. Box 30368, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand; **Douglas Geological Consultants, 14 Jubilee Street, Dunedin 9011, New Zealand; and ††South Australian Museum, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia Edited by James P. Kennett, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, and approved October 11, 2006 (sent for review July 8, 2006) New Zealand (NZ) has long been upheld as the archetypical Ma) dinosaur material (13) and isolated moa bones from marine example of a land where the biota evolved without nonvolant sediments up to 2.5 Ma (1, 14), the terrestrial record older than terrestrial mammals. Their absence before human arrival is mys- 1 Ma is extremely limited. Until now, there has been no direct terious, because NZ was still attached to East Antarctica in the Early evidence for the pre-Pleistocene presence in NZ of any of its Cretaceous when a variety of terrestrial mammals occupied the endemic vertebrate lineages, particularly any group of terrestrial adjacent Australian portion of Gondwana. -
The Impact of Predation by Introduced Mammals on Endemic Shorebirds in New Zealand: a Conservation Perspective
Biological Conservation 99 (2001) 47±64 www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon The impact of predation by introduced mammals on endemic shorebirds in New Zealand: a conservation perspective John E. Dowding a,*, Elaine C. Murphy b aPO Box 36-274, Merivale, Christchurch 8030, New Zealand bScience and Research Unit, Department of Conservation, Private Bag 4715, Christchurch, New Zealand Abstract The avifauna of New Zealand has been severely depleted since human colonisation and currently contains a disproportionately high number of threatened species. Of the 23 threatened shorebird species worldwide, six are endemic to New Zealand. We review the status of New Zealand's endemic shorebirds and examine the impact on them of various threats, particularly predation by introduced mammals. The conservation status of the 10 extant species (three oystercatchers, one stilt, four plovers and two snipe) is outlined and the factors that predisposed them to predation by introduced mammals are summarised. Individual species accounts are presented, including data on population trends, known or suspected impacts of predation, identi®cation of important predator species, other threats, and conservation measures currently in place or required. One species and two subspecies are extinct, three species are con®ned to predator-free islands and another is found only on the Chatham Islands group. Six survive on the mainland but three have declined to varying degrees and are assigned threatened status by Collar et al. (1994). Only one plover and two oystercatchers are still relatively numerous and/or widespread. Rats, cats and mustelids have had the greatest overall impacts. Conservation measures in place to mitigate the eects of introduced predators include the formulation of recovery plans, predator control around breeding areas, captive breeding and rearing programmes and the founding of new populations by translocation. -
SHOREBIRDS of the HAURAKI GULF Around the Shores of the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park
This poster celebrates the species of birds commonly encountered SHOREBIRDS OF THE HAURAKI GULF around the shores of the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park. Red knot Calidris canutus Huahou Eastern curlew Numenius madagascariensis 24cm, 120g | Arctic migrant 63cm, 900g | Arctic migrant South Island pied oystercatcher Haematopus finschi Torea Black stilt 46cm, 550g | Endemic Himantopus novaezelandiae Kaki 40cm, 220g | Endemic Pied stilt Himantopus himantopus leucocephalus Poaka 35cm, 190g | Native (breeding) (non-breeding) Variable oystercatcher Haematopus unicolor Toreapango 48cm, 725g | Endemic Bar-tailed godwit Limosa lapponica baueri Kuaka male: 39cm, 300g | female: 41cm, 350g | Arctic migrant Spur-winged plover Vanellus miles novaehollandiae 38cm, 360g | Native Whimbrel Numenius phaeopus variegatus Wrybill Anarhynchus frontalis 43cm, 450g | Arctic migrant Ngutu pare Ruddy turnstone 20cm, 60g | Endemic Arenaria interpres Northern New Zealand dotterel Charadrius obscurus aquilonius Tuturiwhatu 23cm, 120g | Arctic migrant Shore plover 25cm, 160g | Endemic Thinornis novaeseelandiae Tuturuatu Banded dotterel Charadrius bicinctus bicinctus Pohowera 20cm, 60g | Endemic 20cm, 60g | Endemic (male breeding) Pacific golden plover Pluvialis fulva (juvenile) 25cm, 130g | Arctic migrant (female non-breeding) (breeding) Black-fronted dotterel Curlew sandpiper Calidris ferruginea Elseyornis melanops 19cm, 60g | Arctic migrant 17cm, 33g | Native (male-breeding) (non-breeding) (breeding) (non-breeding) Terek sandpiper Tringa cinerea 23cm, 70g | Arctic migrant -
Varied Success from the Landscape-Scale Management of Kiwi Apteryx Spp
Bird Conservation International (2012) 22:429–444. © BirdLife International, 2012 doi:10.1017/S0959270912000044 Varied success from the landscape-scale management of kiwi Apteryx spp. in five sanctuaries in New Zealand HUGH A. ROBERTSON and PIM J. M. de MONCHY Summary In late 2000, five sanctuaries were established on the mainland of New Zealand for the express purpose of protecting populations of five kiwi Apteryx spp. taxa belonging to three species. Conservation management was undertaken at a landscape scale (10,000–20,000 ha) in each sanctuary to improve recruitment of kiwi. This was done by controlling introduced mammalian predators (especially stoats Mustela erminea), and/or by removing eggs and chicks from predation risk, and returning subadults when they were big enough to cope with stoats. Population modelling of the first five years of the sanctuary programme indicated that kiwi numbers in all five sanctuaries would increase as a result of the management. Calculated population increases varied from 0.6% per year at Okarito to 11.3% per year at Moehau, even though predator trapping was more intense at Okarito. The variation from site to site was explained by the widely different inherent productivity of the various kiwi taxa; widely different rates of adult mortality due to the presence or absence of dogs Canis familiaris and ferrets M. furo, the main predators of long-lived adult kiwi; and, local forest conditions affecting predator-prey cycles, and the density of stoats. As a result of this analysis, the management in four of the five sanctuaries has since been modified to try to achieve better overall gains for kiwi within the same operating budget. -
Muruk July 2007 Vol 8-3-1
Editorial There has been a 7-year gap between the last issue of the Papua New Guinea Birdwatching Society’s journal Muruk in 2000 (Vol. 8: 2) and this issue, which completes that volume. It serves a valuable purpose documenting significant records of New Guinea birds, and publishing notes and papers relevant to New Guinea ornithology. Thanks are due to Conservation International’s Melanesia Centre for Biodiversity Conservation (funded by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation) for coming up with funds for the printing of the journal, with particular thanks to Roger James. The idea is to clear a large backlog of records, and publish articles relating to New Guinea ornithology, with the help of an editorial team: Editor - Phil Gregory Editorial consultants: K. David Bishop, Ian Burrows, Brian Coates, Guy Dutson, Chris Eastwood. We would like feedback about the direction the journal should take; it has been a useful reference resource over the years and is cited in many publications. Current thinking is to publish two issues per annum, with thoughts about expanding coverage to include other nearby areas such as Halmahera and the Solomon Islands, which have a large New Guinea component to the avifauna. The Pacific region as a whole is poorly served and there may be scope to include other parts of Melanesia and Polynesia. We now complete the old pre-2000 subscriptions with this issue, which is sent free to former subscribers, and invite new subscriptions. Editorial address: PO Box 387, Kuranda, Queensland 4881, Australia. Email - [email protected] Significant Sightings from Tour Reports Compiled and edited by Phil Gregory More and more companies are offering tours to PNG, mostly doing the same circuit but still coming up with interesting records or little known or rare species, breeding data or distributional information.