DOCSLIB.ORG

Detection and Generation of Electric Signals in Fishes: an Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Detection and Generation of Electric Signals in Fishes: an Introduction SENSING THE ENVIRONMENT Detection and Generation of Electric Signals Contents Detection and Generation of Electric Signals in Fishes: An Introduction Morphology of Electroreceptive Sensory Organs Physiology of Ampullary Electrosensory Systems Physiology of Tuberous Electrosensory Systems Active Electrolocation Electric Organs Generation of Electric Signals Development of Electroreceptors and Electric Organs Detection and Generation of Electric Signals in Fishes: An Introduction BA Carlson, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA ª 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Further Reading Glossary function both in communication and in locating nearby Active electrolocation The ability of weakly electric fish objects. Short (100 ms to several tens of milliseconds) to orient and detect objects based on their electric sense. electrical pulses of various voltages (a few millivolts to Electric field A spatial gradient in electrical potential. In several hundred volts) are generated at various rates (a animals, these can be actively generated by an electric few to over 1000 times per second. organ or passively generated due to the uneven Electrocommunication Communication based on distribution of ions between the inside of the animal and the electric signals. surrounding water. Direct current (DC) fields are steady, Electroreceptor A sensory cell specialized for the whereas alternating current (AC) fields are changing. detection of external electric fields. Ampullary Electric organ An organ specialized for generating electroreceptors are sensitive to low-frequency fields up external electric fields. Myogenic electric organs are to �50 Hz, whereas tuberous electroreceptors are derived from skeletal muscle and are composed of sensitive to high-frequency fields up to tens of kilohertz individual cells called ‘electrocytes’. Neurogenic electric such as those produced by an EOD. organs are derived from neuronal axons. Electrosense The ability to detect electric fields. A Electric organ discharge (EOD) Electrical discharges passive electrosense is one in which external electric resulting from the summed excitation of the cells fields are detected, whereas an active electrosense is (electrocytes) of the electric organ of electric fishes that one in which self-generated electric fields are detected. Humans have been familiar with the special abilities of and the torpedo rays Torpedo spp. as ‘thunderer’ or ‘trem­ strongly electric fish since antiquity. Egyptian tombstones bler’. The ancient Romans used the shocks of these fish as depict images of the electric catfish Malapterurus electricus. therapeutic treatments for a wide range of medical ail- Ancient Arabic texts refer to both Malapterurus electricus ments. However, it was not until the eighteenth century 347 348 Detection and Generation of Electric Signals | Detection and Generation of Electric Signals in Fishes that the painful, numbing sensations caused by these fish In the late seventeenth century, Stefano Lorenzini were convincingly demonstrated to be caused by electri­ described in detail a series of pores and associated canals city. This discovery of animal electricity set the stage distributed throughout the body of Torpedo spp. that were for the famous experiments of Luigi Galvani, in which later found in many species of aquatic vertebrates, the he demonstrated that frog leg muscles could be made to so-called ampullae of Lorenzini. In 1773, John Walsh, the contract by connecting nerves of the muscle in series first person to detect actual sparks from an electric fish (an with two different metals and the spinal cord. Galvani electric eel), provided the first direct evidence for an incorrectly attributed this effect to a unique form of electric sense. Walsh found that an electric eel would electricity – an innate vital force housed within animal approach a pair of recording electrodes and discharge its tissue that was released by the metal. His contempor­ organ whenever the electrodes were short-circuited, ary, Alessandro Volta, disagreed. Volta maintained that leading him to conclude that eels could detect electrical the contractions were not due to intrinsic electricity, conductors. Du Bois-Reymond, consistent with his but extrinsically generated current provided by contact opinions on weak electric organs, believed that the ampul­ between the two different metals. Volta ultimately lae of Lorenzini served no useful function. Physiological proved correct, but the experiments of Galvani pro­ experiments from the 1930s through the 1960s led various vided the first direct evidence of the electrical basis for researchers to conclude that the ampullae were used for nervous and muscular activity in all animals. The con­ thermoreception, mechanoreception, chemoreception, and troversy engendered by these experiments led to the eventually electroreception. The latter was ultimately con­ invention of the first battery to produce a reliable, firmed through clever behavioral experiments by Kalmijn, steady electrical current – the Voltaic pile – which which conclusively demonstrated the existence of a passive Volta created as an artificial model of an electric electrosense in sharks and rays that was used to locate prey. organ by stacking alternating disks of two different Concomitant to these developments, the discovery of elec­ metals separated by cardboard soaked in brine. trocommunication and active electrolocation by Lissman and Mo¨hres had inspired an intensive effort to identify and When Darwin published On the Origin of Species in 1859, characterize the necessary receptor cells. This culminated in he devoted an entire chapter to problems with his theory the discovery of electroreceptive units in the lateral line of natural selection, which he entitled ‘Difficulties on nerve by Bullock and colleagues that were sensitive to theory’. One area of concern was the evolution of electric much higher frequencies than the low-frequency ampullary organs, of which Darwin remarked ‘‘The electric organs of receptors, making them well suited to detecting the specia­ fishes offer another case of special difficulty; it is lized discharges of weak electric organs. impossible to conceive by what steps these wondrous Today, research in the field is as varied as the diversity ... organs have been produced ’’ By that time, anatomists of organisms possessing an electrosense. Molecular had discovered several groups of fish with relatively small biologists, electrophysiologists, neuroanatomists, mathema­ organs similar in structure to the electric organs of tical modelers, and evolutionary biologists continue to Malapterurus electricus, Torpedo spp. and the electric eel study this distinctly foreign sensory system to ask broadly Electrophorus electricus. Some of these were shown to relevant questions ranging from information processing generate electric fields, but they were far too weak to by sensory systems and the neural organization of motor serve as any kind of a weapon, leading Du Bois- output to the evolution of animal communication and the Reymond to dub them pseudo-electric. Because of process of speciation. The section begins with an overview morphological similarities between skeletal muscle of electroreceptors (see also Detection and Generation of and electric organ, Darwin correctly concluded that Electric Signals: Morphology of Electroreceptive Sensory electric organs likely evolved from muscle, with strong Organs) by Jørgen Mørup Jørgensen, who describes the electric organs evolving from weaker versions. Due to morphology of ampullary electroreceptors used for passive the absence of any apparent common ancestor, he electrolocation and tuberous electroreceptors used for further concluded (again, correctly) that the electric detecting actively generated electric fields for the organs found in different groups of extant fish must purposes of active electrolocation and social communica­ have evolved independently. The problem, as Darwin tion. Jørgensen also summarizes the basic patterns of saw it, was explaining how a weak electric organ could electroreceptor evolution across vertebrates, highlighting serve any adaptive function. Not for another century their multiple, independent origins. Michael Hofmann goes did Lissman and Mo¨hres provide convincing experi­ on to describe the physiology of ampullary electrosensory mental evidence that weak electric organs are used for systems (see also Detection and Generation of Electric communication (electrocommunication) as well as for Signals: Physiology of Ampullary Electrosensory Systems), navigation and orientation (active electrolocation). while Maurice J Chacron and Eric Fortune describe the Such behaviors require a specialized sensory structure – physiology of tuberous electrosensory systems (see also an electroreceptor – for detecting electric fields. Detection and Generation of Electric Signals: Detection and Generation of Electric Signals | Detection and Generation of Electric Signals in Fishes 349 Physiology of Tuberous Electrosensory Systems; in both Bullock TH and Heiligenberg W (eds.) (1986) Electroreception, Wiley Series in Neurobiology (Northcutt RG (ed.)). New York: Wiley. cases, the authors focus on the peripheral encoding of Bullock TH, Hopkins CD, Popper AN, and Fay RR (eds.) (2005) sensory information and mechanisms for the detection of Electroreception, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol. 21. behaviorally relevant stimuli within the central nervous New York: Springer. Darwin C (1859) On the Origin of Species
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electrophorus Electricus ERSS
    Electric Eel (Electrophorus electricus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, August 2011 Revised, July 2018 Web Version, 8/21/2018 Photo: Brian Gratwicke. Licensed under CC BY-NC 3.0. Available: http://eol.org/pages/206595/overview. (July 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Eschmeyer et al. (2018): “Distribution: Amazon and Orinoco River basins and other areas in northern Brazil: Brazil, Ecuador, Colombia, Bolivia, French Guiana, Guyana, Peru, Suriname and Venezuela.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. This species is in trade in the United States. From AquaScapeOnline (2018): “Electric Eel 24” (2 feet) (Electrophorus electricus) […] Our Price: $300.00” 1 The State of Arizona has listed Electrophorus electricus as restricted live wildlife. Restricted live wildlife “means wildlife that cannot be imported, exported, or possessed without a special license or lawful exemption” (Arizona Secretary of State 2006a,b). The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has listed the electric eel Electrophorus electricus as a prohibited species. Prohibited nonnative species, "are considered to be dangerous to the ecology and/or the health and welfare of the people of Florida. These species are not allowed to be personally possessed or used for commercial activities” (FFWCC 2018). The State of Hawaii Plant Industry Division (2006) includes Electrophorus electricus on its list of prohibited animals. From
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW Electric Fish: New Insights Into Conserved Processes of Adult Tissue Regeneration
    2478 The Journal of Experimental Biology 216, 2478-2486 © 2013. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd doi:10.1242/jeb.082396 REVIEW Electric fish: new insights into conserved processes of adult tissue regeneration Graciela A. Unguez Department of Biology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA [email protected] Summary Biology is replete with examples of regeneration, the process that allows animals to replace or repair cells, tissues and organs. As on land, vertebrates in aquatic environments experience the occurrence of injury with varying frequency and to different degrees. Studies demonstrate that ray-finned fishes possess a very high capacity to regenerate different tissues and organs when they are adults. Among fishes that exhibit robust regenerative capacities are the neotropical electric fishes of South America (Teleostei: Gymnotiformes). Specifically, adult gymnotiform electric fishes can regenerate injured brain and spinal cord tissues and restore amputated body parts repeatedly. We have begun to identify some aspects of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of tail regeneration in the weakly electric fish Sternopygus macrurus (long-tailed knifefish) with a focus on regeneration of skeletal muscle and the muscle-derived electric organ. Application of in vivo microinjection techniques and generation of myogenic stem cell markers are beginning to overcome some of the challenges owing to the limitations of working with non-genetic animal models with extensive regenerative capacity. This review highlights some aspects of tail regeneration in S. macrurus and discusses the advantages of using gymnotiform electric fishes to investigate the cellular and molecular mechanisms that produce new cells during regeneration in adult vertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Organ Electric Organ Discharge
    1050 Electric Organ return to the opposite pole of the source. This is 9. Zakon HH, Unguez GA (1999) Development and important in freshwater fish with water conductivity far regeneration of the electric organ. J exp Biol – below the conductivity of body fluids (usually below 202:1427 1434 μ μ 10. Westby GWM, Kirschbaum F (1978) Emergence and 100 S/cm for tropical freshwaters vs. 5,000 S/cm for development of the electric organ discharge in the body fluids, or, in resistivity terms, 10 kOhm × cm vs. mormyrid fish, Pollimyrus isidori. II. Replacement of 200 Ohm × cm, respectively) [4]. the larval by the adult discharge. J Comp Physiol A In strongly electric fish, impedance matching to the 127:45–59 surrounding water is especially obvious, both on a gross morphological level and also regarding membrane physiology. In freshwater fish, such as the South American strongly electric eel, there are only about 70 columns arranged in parallel, consisting of about 6,000 electrocytes each. Therefore, in this fish, it is the Electric Organ voltage that is maximized (500 V or more). In a marine environment, this would not be possible; here, it is the current that should be maximized. Accordingly, in Definition the strong electric rays, such as the Torpedo species, So far only electric fishes are known to possess electric there are many relatively short columns arranged in organs. In most cases myogenic organs generate electric parallel, yielding a low-voltage strong-current output. fields. Some fishes, like the electric eel, use strong – The number of columns is 500 1,000, the number fields for prey catching or to ward off predators, while of electrocytes per column about 1,000.
    [Show full text]
  • A Large 28S Rdna-Based Phylogeny Confirms the Limitations Of
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysA 500: large 25–59 28S (2015) rDNA-based phylogeny confirms the limitations of established morphological... 25 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.500.9360 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research A large 28S rDNA-based phylogeny confirms the limitations of established morphological characters for classification of proteocephalidean tapeworms (Platyhelminthes, Cestoda) Alain de Chambrier1, Andrea Waeschenbach2, Makda Fisseha1, Tomáš Scholz3, Jean Mariaux1,4 1 Natural History Museum of Geneva, CP 6434, CH - 1211 Geneva 6, Switzerland 2 Natural History Museum, Life Sciences, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK 3 Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Branišovská 31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic 4 Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, CH - 1205 Geneva, Switzerland Corresponding author: Jean Mariaux ([email protected]) Academic editor: B. Georgiev | Received 8 February 2015 | Accepted 23 March 2015 | Published 27 April 2015 http://zoobank.org/DC56D24D-23A1-478F-AED2-2EC77DD21E79 Citation: de Chambrier A, Waeschenbach A, Fisseha M, Scholz T and Mariaux J (2015) A large 28S rDNA-based phylogeny confirms the limitations of established morphological characters for classification of proteocephalidean tapeworms (Platyhelminthes, Cestoda). ZooKeys 500: 25–59. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.500.9360 Abstract Proteocephalidean tapeworms form a diverse group of parasites currently known from 315 valid species. Most of the diversity of adult proteocephalideans can be found in freshwater fishes (predominantly cat- fishes), a large proportion infects reptiles, but only a few infect amphibians, and a single species has been found to parasitize possums. Although they have a cosmopolitan distribution, a large proportion of taxa are exclusively found in South America.
    [Show full text]
  • Chirping and Asymmetric Jamming Avoidance Responses in the Electric Fish Distocyclus Conirostris Jacquelyn M
    © 2018. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2018) 221, jeb178913. doi:10.1242/jeb.178913 SHORT COMMUNICATION Chirping and asymmetric jamming avoidance responses in the electric fish Distocyclus conirostris Jacquelyn M. Petzold1,2, JoséA. Alves-Gomes3 and G. Troy Smith1,2,* ABSTRACT of two of more EODs creates a periodic amplitude modulation Electrosensory systems of weakly electric fish must accommodate (beat). Beat frequency is equal to the difference between the EOD competing demands of sensing the environment (electrolocation) frequencies (EODfs) of the two interacting fish. Fish use the beat and receiving social information (electrocommunication). The and the relative geometry of the interacting signals to estimate jamming avoidance response (JAR) is a behavioral strategy thought conspecific EODfs, which convey important social information to reduce electrosensory interference from conspecific signals close (Smith, 2013; Dunlap, et al., 2017). However, slow beats (<10 Hz) in frequency. We used playback experiments to characterize electric created by interactions between fish with similar EODfs can impair organ discharge frequency (EODf), chirping behavior and the JAR of the electrolocation function of the EOD by masking localized EOD Distocyclus conirostris, a gregarious electric fish species. EODs of D. distortions (Heiligenberg, 1973; Matsubara and Heiligenberg, conirostris had low frequencies (∼80–200 Hz) that shifted in response 1978). The JAR is a stereotyped response in which an electric to playback stimuli. Fish consistently lowered EODf in response to fish increases or decreases its EODf to increase beat frequency and higher-frequency stimuli but inconsistently raised or lowered EODf in thereby reduce or eliminate the interference caused by slow beats response to lower-frequency stimuli.
    [Show full text]
  • Pheromones and Animal Behaviour Communication by Smell and Taste
    Pheromones and Animal Behaviour Communication by Smell and Taste Tristram D. Wyatt University of Oxford published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org © Cambridge University Press 2003 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2003 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeface Swift 9/13pt System QuarkXPress® [tb] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data Wyatt, Tristram D., 1956– Pheromones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste / Tristram D. Wyatt. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ). ISBN 0 521 48068 X – ISBN 0 521 48526 6 (pb.) 1. Animal communication. 2. Pheromones. 3. Chemical senses. I. Title. QL776 .W93 2002 591.59 – dc21 2002024628 ISBN 0 521 48068 X hardback ISBN 0 521 48526 6 paperback The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external web sites re- ferred to in this book are correct and active at time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the web sites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Hormones and Sexual Behavior of Teleost Fishes
    Chapter 7 Hormones and Sexual Behavior of Teleost Fishes y David M. Gonc¸alves*, and Rui F. Oliveira*,** y * Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal, Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal, ** Instituto Gulbenkian de Cieˆncia, Oeiras, Portugal more variable during the initial stages of the sequence and SUMMARY more stereotyped towards its end. To account for this Fishes are an excellent group for studying the mechanisms through which hormones modulate the expression of sexual variation, these researchers suggested that an initial appe- behaviors in vertebrates. First, they have radiated virtually titive phase, defined as the phase of searching towards the throughout all aquatic environments and this is reflected in an goal, can be distinguished from a final consummatory extraordinary diversity of mating systems and reproductive phase, defined as the stage when the goal is reached behaviors. Second, many species present a remarkable plasticity (Sherrington, 1906; Craig, 1917). Although this distinction in their sexual displays, as exemplified by fishes that change sex or is still widely applied in studies investigating the mecha- that adopt more than one reproductive tactic during their lifetime, nisms of behavior, there is an ongoing debate on the and this plasticity seems to be mediated by hormones. Third, the usefulness of these terms. In a recent review, Sachs (2007) fish neuroendocrine system is well conserved among vertebrates identified some problems in the current use of the and the mechanisms of hormonal action in behavior are likely to appetitive/consummatory dichotomy. These include the share similarities with those of other vertebrates. We review the difficulties in defining the boundary between the two pha- role of hormones and neuropeptides in the modulation of fish sexual displays.
    [Show full text]
  • The Air-Breathing Behaviour of Brevimyrus Niger (Osteoglossomorpha, Mormyridae)
    Journal of Fish Biology (2007) 71, 279–283 doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01473.x, available onlineathttp://www.blackwell-synergy.com The air-breathing behaviour of Brevimyrus niger (Osteoglossomorpha, Mormyridae) T. MORITZ* AND K. E. LINSENMAIR Lehrstuhl fur¨ Tiero¨kologie und Tropenbiologie, Theodor-Boveri-Institut, Universita¨t Wurzburg,¨ Am Hubland, 97074 Wurzburg,¨ Germany (Received 2 May 2006, Accepted 6 February 2007) Brevimyrus niger is reported to breathe atmospheric air, confirming previous documenta- tion of air breathing in this species. Air is taken up by rising to the water surface and gulping, or permanently resting just below the surface, depending on the environmental conditions. # 2007 The Authors Journal compilation # 2007 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles Key words: elephantfishes; Osteoglossomorpha; weakly electric fish. The Mormyridae consists of 201 weakly electric fishes endemic to Africa (Nelson, 2006). They belong to the Osteoglossomorpha among which air-breathing behaviour is known from several families. All genera of the Osteoglossidae are able to breathe atmospheric air utilizing their swimbladder as a respiratory organ, i.e. Heterotis niloticus (Cuvier) (Luling,¨ 1977), Arapaima gigas (Schinz) (Luling,¨ 1964, 1977). Similarly, Pantodon buchholzi Peters (Schwarz, 1969), which is the only member of the Pantodontidae, and the members of the Notopteridae (Graham, 1997) are air-breathers. A close relative to the mormyrids, Gymnarchus niloticus Cuvier, the only member of the Gymnarchidae, is also well known to breathe air (Hyrtl, 1856; Bertyl, 1958). In the remaining two families within the Osteoglossomorpha air breathing has never been reported from the Hiodontidae (Graham, 1997) and only for a single species, Brevimyrus niger (Gunther),¨ within the Mormyridae (Benech & Lek, 1981; Bigorne, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and Genetics of Electric Organ of Electric Fishes
    International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology ISSN: 2639-216X The Biology and Genetics of Electric Organ of Electric Fishes Khandaker AM* Editorial Department of Zoology, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh Volume 1 Issue 5 *Corresponding author: Ashfaqul Muid Khandaker, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Received Date: November 19, 2018 Department of Zoology, Branch of Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of Published Date: November 29, 2018 DOI: 10.23880/izab-16000131 Dhaka, Bangladesh, Email: [email protected] Editorial The electric fish comprises an interesting feature electric organs and sense feedback signals from their called electric organ (EO) which can generate electricity. EODs by electroreceptors in the skin. These weak signals In fact, they have an electrogenic system that generates an can also serve in communication within and between electric field. This field is used by the fish as a carrier of species. But the strongly electric fishes produce electric signals for active sensing and communicating with remarkably powerful pulses. A large electric eel generates other electric fish [1]. The electric discharge from this in excess of 500 V. A large Torpedo generates a smaller organ is used for navigation, communication, and defense voltage, about 50 V in air, but the current is larger and the and also for capturing prey [2]. The power of electric pulse power in each case can exceed I kW [5]. organ varies from species to species. Some electric fish species can produce strong current (100 to 800 volts), The generating elements of the electric organs are especially electric eel and some torpedo electric rays are specialized cells termed electrocytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Animal Signals. In: Squire LR (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, Volume 8, Pp
    This article was originally published in the Encyclopedia of Neuroscience published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non- commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who you know, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial Searcy W A and Nowicki S (2009) Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Animal Signals. In: Squire LR (ed.) Encyclopedia of Neuroscience, volume 8, pp. 769- 776. Oxford: Academic Press. Author's personal copy Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Animal Signals 769 Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Animal Signals W A Searcy , University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, such as mammals and birds, with extensive parental USA care. Largely as a result of these parental investment S Nowicki , Duke University, Durham, NC, USA patterns, females typically have lower maximal rates ã 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. of reproduction. Thus sexual biases in both parental investment and maximal rates of reproduction predict the predominance of female choice. Introduction Many of the greats of evolutionary biology who followed Darwin were skeptical of the importance of Darwin defined sexual selection in On the Origin of female choice as a selective mechanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Turns: Bridging the Gap Between Human and Animal Communication
    This is a repository copy of Taking turns: bridging the gap between human and animal communication. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/150857/ Version: Published Version Article: Pika, Simone, Wilkinson, Ray, Kendrick, Kobin H. orcid.org/0000-0002-6656-1439 et al. (1 more author) (2018) Taking turns: bridging the gap between human and animal communication. Proceedings of the royal society b-Biological sciences. 20180598. ISSN 1471-2954 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0598 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Downloaded from http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on July 30, 2018 Taking turns: bridging the gap between rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org human and animal communication Simone Pika1,2, Ray Wilkinson3, Kobin H. Kendrick4 and Sonja C. Vernes5,6 1Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany Review 2Department of Comparative Biocognition, Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabru¨ck, Osnabru¨ck, Germany Cite this article: Pika S, Wilkinson R, 3Department of Human Communication Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK Kendrick KH, Vernes SC.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 10: Animal Theory of Mind and Deception
    PS452 Intelligent Behaviour Lecture 10: Animal Theory of Mind and Deception Maxwell J Roberts Department of Psychology University of Essex www.tubemapcentral.com version date: 19/11/2019 Part 3: Intelligent Behaviour in Animals • Lecture 7: Animal Intelligence Tests Measuring animal cognitive capacity • Learning and logic between species • The ubiquitous g factor • Lecture 8: Tools, Puzzles, Beliefs, and Intentions Complex interactions with objects • Natural tool use • Understanding the properties of objects 2 Part 3: Intelligent Behaviour in Animals • Lecture 9: Animal Communication Mindless signals or deliberate acts • Natural communication • Taught language in the laboratory • Lecture 10: Animal Theory of Mind and Deception In search of proto-modules • Animal (lack of) awareness of other minds • Social versus non-social origins of general intelligence 3 Lecture 10: Animal Theory of Mind & Deception • 10.1 Theory of Mind: A Tool for Deception • Theory of Mind and modularity • Evidence for Theory of Mind in animals • 10.2 The Special Case of Deception • Deception in the wild • Primate deception in the wild • Deception in the laboratory • Return of the crows • 10.3 Evaluation: Theory of Mind & Deception 4 Lecture 10: Animal Theory of Mind & Deception • 10.4 The Origins of General Intelligence? • 10.5 Animal, Human, and Machine Intelligence 5 10.1 Theory of Mind: A Tool for Deception • Theory of Mind: A popular concept in child psychology • The assumption that other beings are intentional systems and have mental states, including: Knowledge
    [Show full text]