DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report, Methodology for Bird Species Recovery Planning

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report, Methodology for Bird Species Recovery Planning METHODOLOGY FOR BIRD SPECIES RECOVERY PLANNING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION Final Report Contract ENV.B.2./SER/2009/0076r Scientific and technical assistance supporting the implementation of the Birds Directive Prepared by: BirdLife International Sub-contractor: FACE March 2012 0 1 Executive Summary • The European Commission has nearly 20 years of experience in developing and implementing bird species recovery plans. Some of this experience has led to the best known conservation success stories in the EU. However, successful achievement of the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy requires further strengthening of species recovery efforts, as some of the key targets will depend on that. • The current report was prepared by BirdLife International for the European Commission under service Contract ENV.B.2./SER/2009/0076r “Scientific and technical assistance supporting the implementation of the Birds Directive”. The objective of this contract is to elaborate a new process of producing, approval, monitoring and updating documents supporting the implementation of the Birds Directive (methodology). These documents are: - Species Action Plans for threatened birds listed in Annex I of the Birds Directive; - Species Management Plans for huntable birds considered to be in unfavourable conservation status, listed Annex II of the Birds Directive; - Key Concepts of Article 7(4) of Directive 79/409/EEC. • The contract was implemented by BirdLife International, with the Federation of Associations of Hunting and Conservation in the EU (FACE) as sub-contractor. • For the purpose of this contract, the following tasks were undertaken by the contractors: • Taking stock of the experience with species recovery planning in the EU and analysis of the strengths, weaknesses and opportunities for improvement (e.g. coordinated prioritisation, development, review and implementation); • Proposing an objective method to draw up, approve and regularly revise the list of species in need of EU action plans (Annex III) • Elaboration of methods to produce plans, monitor and facilitate their implementation and update (Part 3) • Drawing up a list of species for which plans or population status assessments should be produced (Section 3.2 and Annex III). • Preparation of species status reports for four species (Annex IV) and lessons learned from this exercise were incorporated into the proposed method. • Organisation of an international conference on bird species recovery (Brussels, 23-24 November 2010) and production of conference report (Annex VI). • Analyse strengths, weaknesses and identify opportunities for improving the Key Concepts document and propose a methodology for updating and reviewing the information it contains (Annex VIII). • Issues investigated • Aims of species recovery in international legislation and the EU Biodiversity policy. • Target audience, users and stakeholders to be considered in recovery plans. • Process and procedures of development, approval, review and revision of plans: strengths and weaknesses of the current approach, opportunities for improvement. 2 • Member State experience with species recovery plans at national and international levels. Experience with the implementation of such plans at local level. • Methods for objective selection of species based on prioritisation. Suggested priorities for action plan development, review and LIFE funding. • Assessment of four species with insufficient knowledge of their conservation status by collating and analysing the latest available data from scientific, conservation and resources use stakeholders and investigating the issues involved with the conservation of the species. • In relation to the Key Concepts document, examination of the criteria used for identifying the pre-nuptial and reproductive period, and review of some recent research on this subject. • As the content and methodology of Species Action Plans and Management Plans are very similar a proposal is made to merge them into a single type – Species Recovery Plan, although it should be clear that depending on the species some differences will remain. Proposals are made as to how to adapt the internationally recognised format of the AEWA Single Species Action Plan format to serve this purpose for the EU. • Part 1 of the report presents the policy basis and aims for bird species recovery in the EU. It summarizes the key obligations for the EU Member States arising from international legislation as well as recent decisions under the Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) • Part 2 deals with the results of an assessment of the current experience with international species recovery plans in the EU. In order to examine in detail certain issues some examples of national species plans are given. Information for this assessment was collected through literature review, discussion with relevant experts and practitioners and a survey among the member states, which can be found in Annex II of the report. • Part 3 presents proposals for improvement of the species recovery planning process following the life-cycle of the recovery plans. • Part 4 summarises the conclusions from the assessment and the most important recommendations for the future of species recovery in the EU. They are: • Species prioritization criteria should be explicit and linked to threat status (Red list); prioritization exercises should be run periodically, in conjunction to conservation status assessments (e.g. every five-six years). • International coordination and synergies between relevant organisations should be maximized (e.g. European Coordination Group for Bird Species Conservation Planning). • The planning process should be organised in order to accommodate the necessary activities for stakeholder involvement and institutional coordination. • Recovery teams with broader competences should be convened to carry out the full spectrum of tasks envisaged in the planning process. • The planning cycle should be rationalized to provide clear options for monitoring, update and reporting. • The implementation arrangements should be developed and better organized, for example trough a Coordination centre for all plans, a Plan coordinator for each plan, national focal points and regular reporting and feedback. • The Commission and Member States should strive to facilitate better use of resources and access to funding for implementation of the plans by repackaging and communicating the plans into policy and budget relevant packages, targeted to the sectors that can ensure implementation. 3 Part of these proposals were discussed with member states and stakeholders during the Conference on bird species recovery (Brussels, 23-24 November 2010) and on subsequent meetings in the frame of this contract (e.g. the Ornis Committee). Other recommendations are made based on the experience of the contractor and sub-contractor. The most important source for recommendations was a survey among 15 Member States with experience in bird conservation planning. Direct communication with key organisations involved in species recovery actions such as the European Commission DG Environment, AEWA|CMS, the Bern Convention, specialist NGOs and individual experts was maintained throughout the contract. The compilers of this report would like to extend their sincere gratitude to the European Commission, DG Environment staff involved managing this contract for their extraordinary commitment to the subject, their guidance and rigorous quality control. 4 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Part 1 - Aims of Bird Species Recovery ....................................................................................................... 8 1.1 The Convention of Biological Diversity ..................................................................................... 8 1.2 Species recovery in the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy ........................................................... 8 1.3 Species recovery aims in the Birds Directive ........................................................................... 9 1.4 Other International commitments of the EU and Member States related to conservation of wild birds ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Part 2 - Experience with Bird Species Recovery Plans in the EU ................................................................ 16 2.1 Bird Species Recovery plans produced by the European Commission: Overview ................ 16 2.2 Scope and methods of the assessment ................................................................................. 17 2.3 Jurisdiction of the recovery plans .......................................................................................... 17 2.4 Who are the recovery plans written for? Definition of their target audience ...................... 18 2.5 Recovery planning cycle ......................................................................................................... 19 2.6 Setting priorities: Selecting species for recovery plans ......................................................... 20 2.7 Defining the scope of the plans ............................................................................................. 22 2.8 Development of recovery plans
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 680 Subpart I—Paperwork Reduction
    § 595.901 31 CFR Ch. V (7±1±97 Edition) Disclosure of Records of the Depart- 596.403 Transactions incidental to a licensed mental Offices and of other bureaus transaction. and offices of the Department of the 596.404 Financial transactions transferred through a bank of a Terrorism List Gov- Treasury issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a and ernment. published at 31 CFR part 1. (c) Any form issued for use in connec- Subpart EÐLicenses, Authorizations and tion with this part may be obtained in Statements of Licensing Policy person or by writing to the Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Depart- 596.501 Effect of license or authorization. 596.502 Exclusion from licenses and author- ment of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylva- izations. nia Avenue, N.W.ÐAnnex, Washington, 596.503 Financial transactions with a Terror- DC 20220, or by calling 202/622±2480. ism List Government otherwise subject to 31 CFR chapter V. Subpart IÐPaperwork Reduction 596.504 Certain financial transactions with Terrorism List Governments authorized. Act 596.505 Certain transactions related to sti- pends and scholarships authorized. § 595.901 Paperwork Reduction Act no- tice. Subpart FÐReports The information collection require- 596.601 Required records. ments in §§ 595.503, 595.504, subpart F, 596.602 Reports to be furnished on demand. and §§ 595.703 and 595.801 have been ap- 596.603 Notification by financial institutions proved by the Office of Management rejecting financial transactions. and Budget under the Paperwork Re- duction Act and assigned control num- Subpart GÐPenalties ber 1505-0156. 596.701 Penalties. PART 596ÐTERRORISM LIST GOV- Subpart HÐProcedures ERNMENTS SANCTIONS REGULA- 596.801 Licensing.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers and Lakes in Serbia
    NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANISATION OF SERBIA Čika Ljubina 8, 11000 Belgrade Phone: +381 11 6557 100 Rivers and Lakes Fax: +381 11 2626 767 E-mail: [email protected] www.serbia.travel Tourist Information Centre and Souvenir Shop Tel : +381 11 6557 127 in Serbia E-mail: [email protected] NATIONAL TOURISM ORGANISATION OF SERBIA www.serbia.travel Rivers and Lakes in Serbia PALIĆ LAKE BELA CRKVA LAKES LAKE OF BOR SILVER LAKE GAZIVODE LAKE VLASINA LAKE LAKES OF THE UVAC RIVER LIM RIVER DRINA RIVER SAVA RIVER ADA CIGANLIJA LAKE BELGRADE DANUBE RIVER TIMOK RIVER NIŠAVA RIVER IBAR RIVER WESTERN MORAVA RIVER SOUTHERN MORAVA RIVER GREAT MORAVA RIVER TISA RIVER MORE RIVERS AND LAKES International Border Monastery Provincial Border UNESKO Cultural Site Settlement Signs Castle, Medieval Town Archeological Site Rivers and Lakes Roman Emperors Route Highway (pay toll, enterance) Spa, Air Spa One-lane Highway Rural tourism Regional Road Rafting International Border Crossing Fishing Area Airport Camp Tourist Port Bicycle trail “A river could be an ocean, if it doubled up – it has in itself so much enormous, eternal water ...” Miroslav Antić - serbian poet Photo-poetry on the rivers and lakes of Serbia There is a poetic image saying that the wide lowland of The famous Viennese waltz The Blue Danube by Johann Vojvodina in the north of Serbia reminds us of a sea during Baptist Strauss, Jr. is known to have been composed exactly the night, under the splendor of the stars. There really used to on his journey down the Danube, the river that connects 10 be the Pannonian Sea, but had flowed away a long time ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Reanalysis of Strauch's Osteological Data Set for The
    TheCondor97:174-196 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1995 PHYLOGENETIC REANALYSIS OF STRAUCH’S OSTEOLOGICAL DATA SET FOR THE CHARADRIIFORMES PHILIP c. CHU Department of Biology and Museum of Zoology The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Abstract. Strauch’s (1978) compatibility analysisof relationshipsamong the shorebirds (Charadriifonnes) was the first study to examine the full range of charadriifonn taxa in a reproducibleway. SubsequentlyMickevich and Parenti (1980) leveled seriouscharges against Strauch’s characters,method of phylogenetic inference, and results. To account for these charges,Strauch ’s characterswere re-examined and recoded, and parsimony analyseswere performed on the revised matrix. A parsimony analysison 74 taxa from the revised matrix yielded 855 shortesttrees, each length = 286 and consistencyindex = 0.385. In each shortest tree there were two major lineages,a lineageof sandpiper-likebirds and a lineageof plover- like birds; the two formed a monophyletic group, with the auks (Alcidae) being that group’s sister taxon. The shortest trees were then compared with other estimates of shorebird re- lationships, comparison suggestingthat the chargesagainst Strauch’s results may have re- sulted from the Mickevich and Parenti decisions to exclude much of Strauch’s character evidence. Key words: Charadrilformes; phylogeny; compatibility analysis: parsimony analysis; tax- onomic congruence. INTRODUCTION Strauch scored 227 charadriiform taxa for 70 The investigation of evolutionary relationships characters. Sixty-three of the characters were among shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) has a taken from either the skull or postcranial skel- long history (reviewed in Sibley and Ahlquist eton; the remaining seven involved the respec- 1990). Almost all studies used morphology to tive origins of three neck muscles, as published make inferences about shared ancestry; infer- in Burton (1971, 1972, 1974) and Zusi (1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    i procp:edings of uxited states national :\[uset7m. 359 23498 g. D. 13 5 A. 14; Y. 3; P. 35; 0. 31 ; B. S. Leiigtli ICT millime- ters. GGGl. 17 specimeus. St. Michaels, Alaslai. II. M. Bannister. a. Length 210 millimeters. D. 13; A. 14; V. 3; P. 33; C— ; B. 8. h. Length 200 millimeters. D. 14: A. 14; Y. 3; P. 35; C— ; B. 8. e. Length 135 millimeters. D. 12: A. 14; Y. 3; P. 35; C. 30; B. 8. The remaining fourteen specimens vary in length from 110 to 180 mil- limeters. United States National Museum, WasJiingtoiij January 5, 1880. FOURTBI III\.STAI.:HEIVT OF ©R!VBTBIOI.O«ICAI. BIBI.IOCiRAPHV r BE:INC} a Jf.ffJ^T ©F FAUIVA!. I»l.TjBf.S«'ATI©.\S REff,ATIIV« T© BRIT- I!§H RIRD!^. My BR. ELS^IOTT COUES, U. S. A. The zlppendix to the "Birds of the Colorado Yalley- (pp. 507 [lJ-784 [218]), which gives the titles of "Faunal Publications" relating to North American Birds, is to be considered as the first instalment of a "Uni- versal Bibliography of Ornithology''. The second instalment occupies pp. 230-330 of the " Bulletin of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories 'V Yol. Y, No. 2, Sept. G, 1879, and similarly gives the titles of "Faunal Publications" relating to the Birds of the rest of America.. The.third instalment, which occnpies the same "Bulletin", same Yol.,, No. 4 (in press), consists of an entirely different set of titles, being those belonging to the "systematic" department of the whole Bibliography^ in so far as America is concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Phenology of Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes Minimus at an Irish Coastal Wetland
    Migration phenology of Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus at an Irish coastal wetland Tom Cooney 42 All Saint’s Road, Raheny, Dublin D05 C627 Corresponding author: [email protected] Keywords: Ireland, Jack Snipe, Lymnocryptes minimus , migration phenology Migration times of Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus were monitored at North Bull Island in Dublin Bay during 2011/2012 to 2016/2017. Average arrival times in autumn centred on 2 October and average departure times in spring on 23 April. Although these results were site and habitat specific, they were similar to recent migration data for Ireland. While the time series examined for Ireland and Britain were of different lengths, migration times were extraordinarily similar. The average autumn arrival date for Ireland as a whole was 16 September while that for Britain was 23 September, and departure times in spring for Ireland centred on 30 April, one day later than in Britain. The close agreement suggests that migration times across both islands possibly occur synchronously. Other recently generated data for Ireland provides tantalising evidence that passage migration may take place and that Jack Snipe could be more frequent in upland areas than previously suspected. In both instances greater clarity will only be possible through increased observer effort and higher detection rates of this enigmatic species. Introduction Britain, but not in Ireland (Smiddy 2002). In winter, Jack Snipe appear to be widely but thinly distributed across much of Jack Snipe Lymnocryptes minimus are difficult to detect in Ireland with highest densities in counties along the west coast winter largely due to their solitary behaviour, nocturnal or (Balmer et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an Annotated Checklist
    European Journal of Taxonomy 306: 1–69 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.306 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Gedeon K. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A32EAE51-9051-458A-81DD-8EA921901CDC The birds (Aves) of Oromia, Ethiopia – an annotated checklist Kai GEDEON 1,*, Chemere ZEWDIE 2 & Till TÖPFER 3 1 Saxon Ornithologists’ Society, P.O. Box 1129, 09331 Hohenstein-Ernstthal, Germany. 2 Oromia Forest and Wildlife Enterprise, P.O. Box 1075, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. 3 Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Centre for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Adenauerallee 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F46B3F50-41E2-4629-9951-778F69A5BBA2 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F59FEDB3-627A-4D52-A6CB-4F26846C0FC5 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:A87BE9B4-8FC6-4E11-8DB4-BDBB3CFBBEAA Abstract. Oromia is the largest National Regional State of Ethiopia. Here we present the first comprehensive checklist of its birds. A total of 804 bird species has been recorded, 601 of them confirmed (443) or assumed (158) to be breeding birds. At least 561 are all-year residents (and 31 more potentially so), at least 73 are Afrotropical migrants and visitors (and 44 more potentially so), and 184 are Palaearctic migrants and visitors (and eight more potentially so). Three species are endemic to Oromia, 18 to Ethiopia and 43 to the Horn of Africa. 170 Oromia bird species are biome restricted: 57 to the Afrotropical Highlands biome, 95 to the Somali-Masai biome, and 18 to the Sudan-Guinea Savanna biome.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonnare in Italy: Science, History, and Culture of Sardinian Tuna Fishing 1
    Tonnare in Italy: Science, History, and Culture of Sardinian Tuna Fishing 1 Katherine Emery The Mediterranean Sea and, in particular, the cristallina waters of Sardinia are confronting a paradox of marine preservation. On the one hand, Italian coastal resources are prized nationally and internationally for their natural beauty as well as economic and recreational uses. On the other hand, deep-seated Italian cultural values and traditions, such as the desire for high-quality fresh fish in local cuisines and the continuity of ancient fishing communities, as well as the demands of tourist and real-estate industries, are contributing to the destruction of marine ecosystems. The synthesis presented here offers a unique perspective combining historical, scientific, and cultural factors important to one Sardinian tonnara in the context of the larger global debate about Atlantic bluefin tuna conservation. This article is divided into four main sections, commencing with contextual background about the Mediterranean Sea and the culture, history, and economics of fish and fishing. Second, it explores as a case study Sardinian fishing culture and its tonnare , including their history, organization, customs, regulations, and traditional fishing method. Third, relevant science pertaining to these fisheries’ issues is reviewed. Lastly, the article considers the future of Italian tonnare and marine conservation options. Fish and fishing in the Mediterranean and Italy The word ‘Mediterranean’ stems from the Latin words medius [middle] and terra [land, earth]: middle of the earth. 2 Ancient Romans referred to it as “ Mare nostrum ” or “our sea”: “the territory of or under the control of the European Mediterranean countries, especially Italy.” 3 Today, the Mediterranean Sea is still an important mutually used resource integral to littoral and inland states’ cultures and trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerdon's Courser, Once Thought to Be Extinct (Ripley 1952,1982, King 1981)
    山階鳥研報 (J. Yamashina Inst. Ornith.), 21: 165-174, 1989 Systematics, Biogeography, and Conservation of Jerdon's Courser Rhinoptilus bitorquatus S. Dillon Ripley* and Bruce M. Beehler* Abstract A cladistic analysis of Jerdon's Courser (Rhinoptilus bitorquatus) and eight allied taxa supports the validity of the Afro-Asian genus Rhinoptilus and indicates that the sister-species of the Indian relict bitorquatus is the Three-banded Courser (Rhinoptilus cinctus) of eastern Africa. The present distribution of these two sister forms is evidence for a former biotic link between peninsular India and the savanna habitats of eastern Africa. This distributional trend is corroborated by an additional list of forty-three species or sister-species pairs that exhibit this Afro-Indian pattern. We believe that these data support the notion that there once existed an Afro-Indian fauna that inhabited what was probably a continuous belt of savanna from southern Africa to southern India. The recovery plan for the critically-endangered Jerdon's Courser should include at- tempts to develop a captive population of R. cinctus, which could then be used to rear eggs taken from wild populations of bitorquatus. Captive breeding, in concert with local educa- tion and efforts to expand protected areas of prime habitat, offers the most promising in- tegrated strategy for the species' recovery. Introduction Jerdon's Courser, once thought to be extinct(Ripley 1952,1982, King 1981),was rediscoveredin the hillsof southern Andhra Pradesh in January 1986 (Bhushan 1986a, 1986b). Although itis impossibleto presentlygive an accurateestimate of the distribu- tion and sizeof thisremnant population,the assumption is that the species'numbers are few and probably dissectedinto tiny subpopulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912
    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
    [Show full text]
  • Saxicola Dacotiae
    Ardeol a 57(2), 2010, 387-405 NEW DATA ON THE POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT PREFERENCES OF THE CANARY ISLANDS STONECHAT SAXICOLA DACOTIAE NUEVOS DATOS SOBRE EL TAMAÑO POBLACIONAL, LA DISTRIBUCIÓN Y LAS PREFERENCIAS DE HÁBITAT DE LA TARABILLA CANARIA SAXICOLA DACOTIAE Javier SEOANE 1 *, Alexandra KOUR I1, Juan Carlos ILLER A2, 3, David PALOMIN O4, César L . A LONS O5 an d Luis M . C ARRASCA L6 SUMMARY .— New data on the population, distribution and habitat preferences of the Canary Islands stonechat Saxicola dacotiae . This paper updates estimates of population size, distribution and habitat preferences of the endemic Canary Islands stonechat Saxicola dacotiae on the basis of data gathered across their whole distribution range, the island of Fuerteventura. We surveyed 1,462 0.5-km line transects during the reproductive seasons in 2005 and 2006, distributed across the whole island. Results were used to estimate population size using two methods: stratified estimates of mean densities and sum of estimated abundances across strata, and sum of estimations of abundance in 1 km x 1 km UTM squares based on statistical models built by boosted regression trees (BRT). In both methods we accounted for the effects of bird detectability in transects. Overall, 490 mature individuals were recorded. The Canary Islands stonechat preferred high, steep terrain (particularly above 20% slope and 200 m a.s.l.) and selected negatively the lower and flatter areas comprising most of the island. These habitats were occupied, however, albeit at low density. The highest average densities sampled per habitat (up to 43 birds/km 2) were registered on steep areas (> 11%) with scrub, although the statistical models predicted densities of 66 birds/km 2 in the optimum 1 Grupo de Ecología Terrestre (TEG), Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid .
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds of Wimbledon Common and Putney Heath 2015
    The Birds of Wimbledon Common and Putney Heath 2015 Male Wheatear on the log pile 1 The Birds of Wimbledon Common and Putney Heath 2015 The Birds of Wimbledon Common and Putney Heath 2015 espite coverage on the Common being rather poor again this year, a total of 96 species were D recorded, four more than in 2014. Of these, 45 bred or probably bred, with no doubt the highlight of the year being the successful breeding of a pair of Skylarks on the Plain, the first to do so since 2007. Much credit for this achievement must go to Wildlife & Conservation Officer, Peter Haldane, and his staff, who have persevered over the years to create a suitable and safe habitat for this Red-listed bird. Credit is also due to Chief Executive, Simon Lee, for his valuable cooperation, and indeed to the vast majority of the visiting public, many of whom have displayed a keen interest in the well-being of these iconic birds. Signage on the Plain this year was extended to the two uncut sections during the autumn and winter months, thus affording our migrants and winter-visiting birds a sanctuary in which to feed and shelter safely. Another outstanding high note this year was the Snow Bunting found on the Large Mound in January, a first for the Common since records began in 1974; and yet another first for the Common came in the form of three Whooper Swans at Rushmere in December. There was also a surprising influx of Lesser Spotted Woodpeckers during the spring, a bird that in the previous few years had become an extremely scarce visitor.
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Pneumatization Patterns and Bursa of Fabricius in North American Shorebirds
    CRANIAL PNEUMATIZATION PATTERNS AND BURSA OF FABRICIUS IN NORTH AMERICAN SHOREBIRDS RAYIUOND MCNEIL AND JEAN BURTON study of age criteria in some species of North American shorebirds A brought us to consider two of the best known techniques of age deter- mination in birds, the size of the bursa of Fabricius and the degrees and pat- terns of skull pneumatization. The only attempt, known to us, to correlate bursa of Fabricius and gonadal development with the ossification of the skull is that of Davis (1947). The bursa of Fabricius is a lympho-epithelial organ lying dorsally above the cloaca. At least in some species it has an opening in the cloaca. It reaches its maximum size at 4-6 months and then begins involution (Davis, 1947). By cloaca1 examination of the bursal pouch, it is possible to distinguish juvenile from adult individuals of some taxa of birds especially Anseriformes and Galliformes (Gower, 1939; Hochbaum, 1942; Linduska, 1943; Kirkpatrick, 1944). Unfortunately, in shorebird species, the bursa of Fabricius has no cloaca1 opening and thus cannot be used as an age criterion of living birds. The pneumatization of the skull has been used as a criterion for estimating the age of birds by C. L. Brehm as far back as 1822 (Niethammer, 1968)) but it was not generally used until the turn of the century (Serventy et al., 1967). Miller (1946) describes the skull ossification process as follows: “The skull of a passerine bird when it leaves the nest is made of a single layer of bone in the area overlaying the brain; at least, the covering appears single when viewed mac- roscopically.
    [Show full text]