DOCSLIB.ORG

(FERC). 2008. Preparing Environmental Assessments: Guidelines for Applicants, Contractors and Staff

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(FERC). 2008. Preparing Environmental Assessments: Guidelines for Applicants, Contractors and Staff License Application Exhibit E – Environmental Report South SWP Hydropower, FERC Project No. 2426-227 8.0 REFERENCES CITED 8.1 REFERENCES CITED – SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). 2008. Preparing Environmental Assessments: Guidelines for Applicants, Contractors and Staff. Kavalec, Chris, Asish Gautam, Mike Jaske, Lynn Marshall, Nahid Movassagh, and Ravinderpal Vaid. 2018. California Energy Demand 2018 — 2030 Revised Forecast. California Energy Commission, Electricity Assessments Division. Publication Number: CEC-200-2018-002-CMF. 8.2 REFERENCES CITED – SECTION 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES California Department of Water Resources (DWR). 2019. Title: i003_Proposed_Project_Boundary_SouthSWP_20181210. Prepared by Nathan Buchholz, DWR – Geodetic Branch – Property Management, Land Surveyor. Published January 4, 2018. 8.3 REFERENCES CITED – SECTION 3.0 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE RIVER BASINS Benson, A.J., R.M. Kipp, J. Larson, and A. Fusaro, 2020, Potamopyrgus antipodarum (J.E. Gray, 1853): U.S. Geological Survey, Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database, Gainesville, FL. Available online: https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?SpeciesID=1008. Revision Date: December 19, 2019. Accessed: January 2, 2020. Los Angeles County. 2015. Los Angeles County 2035 General Plan. October 6, 2015. Available online: http://planning.lacounty.gov/generalplan. Accessed: February 28, 2019. POWER Engineers, Inc. (POWER). 2010. Castaic Power Plant Sediment Removal Project Biological Assessment. Prepared for LADWP. August 2010. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (USFS). 2006. Angeles National Forest Land Management Plan. April 2006. Available online: https://www.fs.usda.gov/main/angeles/landmanagement/planning. Accessed: February 28, 2019. _____. 2005. Los Padres National Forest Land Management Plan. September 2005. Available online: https://www.fs.usda.gov/main/lpnf/landmanagement/planning. Accessed: February 28, 2019. Department of Water Resources/ Page 8-1 January 2020 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power License Application Exhibit E – Environmental Report South SWP Hydropower, FERC Project No. 2426-227 U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM). 1994. South Coast Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision. June 1994. Available online: https://eplanning.blm.gov/epl-front- office/eplanning/planAndProjectSite.do?methodName=dispatchToPatternPage&c urrentPageId=96964. Accessed: February 28, 2019. 8.4 REFERENCES CITED – SECTION 4.0 SCOPE OF CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ANALYSIS Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 2008. Preparing Environmental Documents, Guidelines for Applicants, Contractors, and Staff. Available online: https://www.ferc.gov/industries/hydropower/gen-info/guidelines/eaguide.pdf. Accessed: April 30, 2019. Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning. 2017. Centennial Project Draft Environmental Impact Report. Available online: http://planning.lacounty.gov/case/view/specific_plan_no_02_232_centennial_spe cific_plan. Accessed: November 13, 2018. 8.5 REFERENCES CITED – SECTION 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 8.5.1 References Cited – Section 5.1 Geology and Soils Atwater, Tanya and Helmut Ehrenspeck. 2000. The Incredible Cenozoic Geologic History of Southern California, National Association of Geoscience Teachers-Far Western Section for Spring Field Conference April 14-16, 2000 by Department of Geosciences, California State University, Northridge. California Department of Water Resources (DWR). 2018. Final Survey Report, Pyramid Lake Capacity Table Report, by DWR, Division of Engineering – Geodetic Branch – Mapping Section. September 11, 2018. _____. 2014a. Supporting Technical Information Document, Pyramid Dam, FERC Project No. 2426. July 2014. _____. 2014b. Supporting Technical Information Document, Quail Dam, FERC Project No. 2426. May 2014. _____. 2013. Pyramid Dam and Reservoir, Results of Compilation and Analysis of Landslide Mapping. January 22, 2013. _____. 2012. Pyramid Dam Radial Gate, Faulting and Seismicity, Project Geology Report No. 56-12-32. October 2012. _____. 2011. Final Construction Geology Report, Vista Del Lago, Erosion Repair, Appendix to Final Construction Report, Contract No. C51368, Specification No. 08-04. February 11, 2011. Department of Water Resources/ Page 8-2 January 2020 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power License Application Exhibit E – Environmental Report South SWP Hydropower, FERC Project No. 2426-227 _____. 2010. Memorandum – Erosion Evaluation for the Simulation of Natural Flows from Pyramid Dam into Middle Piru Creek. September 23, 2010. _____. 2009. Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report, East Branch Enlargement Phase II Project. Pages 3.1-1 through 3.1-23. _____. 2007. Proposed Peace Valley Pipeline Repairs Memorandum, Report No. 56- 50-13. July 19, 2007. _____. 2004. Final Construction Geology Report, Quail Detention Embankment, Project Geology Report C-97, Appendix to Final Construction Report Contract No. C- 50486, Specification No. 82-41. October 2004. _____. 2002. Final Construction Geology Report, Pyramid Dam, Spillway Remediation, Appendix to Final Construction Report, Project Geology Report C-130, Contract No. C51069, Specification 95-15. April 2002. _____. 1991. Seismic Stability Evaluation of the Quail Detention and Peace Valley Intake Embankments. February 1991. _____. 1978. West Branch Completion Project, Seismicity. May 9, 1978. _____. 1977a. Geology and Construction Materials Data, West Branch Completion Project, Project Geology Report D-130. October 1977. _____. 1977b. Angeles Tunnel Spoil Area, Plan and Section, As-built, Drawing No. M- 28JI-6, Sheet 20, Specification No. 66-22. August 24, 1977. _____. 1975. Final Geologic Report on Foundation Conditions and Grouting, Pyramid Dam, Part I, Foundation Geology, Project Geology Report C-87, Appendix to Final Construction Report, Pyramid Dam and Lake, Contract No. C50012, Specification No. 71-03. January 1975. _____. 1974. Final Geologic Report on Foundation Conditions and Grouting, Pyramid Dam, Part II, Grouting, Project Geology Report C-87, Appendix to Final Construction Report, Pyramid Dam and Lake, Contract No. C50012, Specification No. 71-03. June 1974. _____. 1971. Final Geologic Report on Angeles Tunnel, Project Geology Report C-63, Appendix A to Final Construction Report, Contract No. 955350, Specification No. 66-22. January 6, 1971. _____. 1963. Preliminary Geologic Report of Castaic Power Plant and Penstock, Scheme 6-B. May 1963. Department of Water Resources/ Page 8-3 January 2020 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power License Application Exhibit E – Environmental Report South SWP Hydropower, FERC Project No. 2426-227 California Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD). 2002. Guidelines for Use of the Consequence-Hazard Matrix and Selection of Ground Motion Parameters. William A. Fraser, Chief, Geology Branch and Jeffrey K. Howard, Senior Engineering Geologist. October 4, 2002. Available online: https://water.ca.gov/LegacyFiles/damsafety/docs/CHM.pdf. Accessed: April 4, 2019. California Geological Survey (CGS). 2012. Geologic Compilation of Quaternary Surficial Deposits in Southern California, Special Report 217, Plate 22, Lancaster 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle. _____. 2007. Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Fault Zones Maps, Special Publication 42. Converse Foundation Engineers (Converse). 1967. Geologic and Foundation Studies, West Branch Project, Castaic Power Plant and Forebay, Report No. 5, Final Penstock and 50-MW Pump-Starting Unit Investigation, Project No. 65-534-AH, August 31, 1967. Crowell, J.C. 1982. Geologic History of Ridge Basin, Southern California, Society for Sedimentary Geology-Pacific Section. Crowell, J.C. and M.H. Link. 1982. The Tectonics of Ridge Basin, Southern California, Society for Sedimentary Geology-Pacific Section. Dibblee, T.W. and Ehrenspeck, H.E. 1997. Geologic Map of the Whitaker Peak Quadrangle, Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, California. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). 2015. Lower Quail Canal Station 288+00 Settlement, to Ted Craddock, DWR. August 28, 2015. _____. 2013. Results of the P-2426 Environmental Compliance Inspection, to Ted Craddock, DWR. October 24, 2013.Federal Power Commission, Bureau of Power. 1976. Final Environmental Impact Statement, California Aqueduct Project No. 2426. Foster, B. D. 2003. Landslides in the Interstate 5 Corridor between Valencia and Gorman, Los Angeles County, California, California Geological Survey Special Report 188, for Caltrans, Project F99TL34. GEI Consultants, Inc. (GEI). 2005. Elderberry Forebay Dam, Supporting Technical Information Document, FERC Project 2426, for Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. July 2005. Miller, W.E. and T. Downs. 1974. A Hemphillian local fauna containing a new genus of Antilocaprid from Southern California. Natural History Museum, Los Angeles County. Contributions in Science 258:1-36. Department of Water Resources/ Page 8-4 January 2020 Los Angeles Department of Water and Power License Application Exhibit E – Environmental Report South SWP Hydropower, FERC Project No. 2426-227 Natural Resources Conservation Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (NRCS). 2015a. Custom Soil Resource Report for Angeles National Forest Area, California, and Antelope Valley Area, Peace Valley. November 9, 2015. _____. 2015b. Custom Soil Resource Report for Angeles National Forest Area, California, and Antelope Valley Area,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Center Comments to the California Department of Fish and Game
    July 24, 2006 Ryan Broderick, Director California Department of Fish and Game 1416 Ninth Street, 12th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Improving efficiency of California’s fish hatchery system Dear Director Broderick: On behalf of the Pacific Rivers Council and Center for Biological Diversity, we are writing to express our concerns about the state’s fish hatchery and stocking system and to recommend needed changes that will ensure that the system does not negatively impact California’s native biological diversity. This letter is an update to our letter of August 31, 2005. With this letter, we are enclosing many of the scientific studies we relied on in developing this letter. Fish hatcheries and the stocking of fish into lakes and streams cause numerous measurable, significant environmental effects on California ecosystems. Based on these impacts, numerous policy changes are needed to ensure that the Department of Fish and Game’s (“DFG”) operation of the state’s hatchery and stocking program do not adversely affect California’s environment. Further, as currently operated, the state’s hatchery and stocking program do not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act, Administrative Procedures Act, California Endangered Species Act, and federal Endangered Species Act. The impacts to California’s environment, and needed policy changes to bring the state’s hatchery and stocking program into compliance with applicable state and federal laws, are described below. I. FISH STOCKING NEGATIVELY IMPACTS CALIFORNIA’S NATIVE SALMONIDS, INCLUDING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES Introduced salmonids negatively impact native salmonids in a variety of ways. Moyle, et. al. (1996) notes that “Introduction of non-native fish species has also been the single biggest factor associated with fish declines in the Sierra Nevada.” Moyle also notes that introduced species are contributing to the decline of 18 species of native Sierra Nevada fish species, and are a major factor in the decline of eight of those species.
    [Show full text]
  • State of California
    Upper Piru Creek Wild Trout Management Plan 2012-2017 State of California Department of Fish and Game Heritage and Wild Trout Program South Coast Region Prepared by Roger Bloom, Stephanie Mehalick, and Chris McKibbin 2012 Table of contents Executive summary .................................................................................. 3 Resource status ........................................................................................ 3 Area description ...................................................................................................... 3 Land ownership/administration ............................................................................... 4 Public access .......................................................................................................... 4 Designations ........................................................................................................... 4 Area maps............................................................................................................... 5 Figure 1. Vicinity map of upper Piru Creek watershed ............................................ 5 Figure 2. Map of upper Piru Creek Heritage and Wild Trout-designated reach....... 6 Fishery description.................................................................................................. 6 Figure 3. Photograph of USGS gaging station near confluence of Piru and Buck creeks ..................................................................................................................... 7
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/17/2020 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State
    Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development State National Wild and Scenic River Classification Unit Name NFS Acreage Other Acreage Total Acreage Alabama Sipsey Fork West Fork, Alabama WILD William B. Bankhead National Forest 6,134 110 6,244 SCENIC William B. Bankhead National Forest 3,550 505 4,055 Sipsey Fork West Fork, Alabama Totals 9,685 615 10,300 Alabama Totals 9,685 615 10,300 Arizona Fossil Creek, Arizona WILD Coconino National Forest 1,720 0 1,720 Tonto National Forest 1,085 0 1,085 RECREATIONAL Coconino National Forest 1,137 4 1,141 Tonto National Forest 1,136 0 1,136 Fossil Creek, Arizona Totals 5,078 4 5,082 Verde, Arizona WILD Coconino National Forest 525 0 525 Tonto National Forest 6,234 0 6,234 SCENIC Coconino National Forest 2,862 0 2,862 Prescott National Forest 2,148 25 2,173 Tonto National Forest 649 0 649 Verde, Arizona Totals 12,418 25 12,443 Arizona Totals 17,496 29 17,525 2020 Land Areas Report Refresh Date: 10/17/2020 Table 13 - National Wild and Scenic Rivers by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary development State National Wild and Scenic River Classification Unit Name NFS Acreage Other Acreage Total Acreage Arkansas Big Piney Creek, Arkansas SCENIC Ozark National Forest 6,448 781 7,229 Big Piney Creek, Arkansas Totals 6,448 781 7,229 Buffalo, Arkansas WILD Ozark National Forest 2,871 0 2,871 SCENIC Ozark National Forest 1,915 0 1,915 Buffalo, Arkansas Totals 4,785 0 4,786
    [Show full text]
  • List of Fish and Game Commission Designated Wild Trout Waters
    The following waters are designated by the Commission as "wild trout waters": 1. American River, North Fork, from Palisade Creek downstream to Iowa Hill Bridge (Placer County). 2. Carson River, East Fork, upstream from confluence with Wolf Creek excluding tributaries (Alpine County). 3. Clavey River, upstream from confluence with Tuolumne River excluding tributaries (Tuolumne County). 4. Fall River, from Pit No. 1 powerhouse intake upstream to origin at Thousand Springs including Spring Creek, but excluding all other tributaries (Shasta County). 5. Feather River, Middle Fork, from Oroville Reservoir upstream to Sloat vehicle bridge, excluding tributaries (Butte and Plumas counties). 6. Hat Creek, from Lake Britton upstream to Hat No. 2 powerhouse (Shasta County). 7. Hot Creek, from Hot Springs upstream to west property line of Hot Creek Ranch (Mono County). 8. Kings River, from Pine Flat Lake upstream to confluence with South and Middle forks excluding tributaries (Fresno County). 9. Kings River, South Fork, from confluence with Middle Fork upstream to western boundary of Kings Canyon National Park excluding tributaries (Fresno County). 10. Merced River, South Fork, from confluence with mainstem Merced River upstream to western boundary of Yosemite National Park excluding tributaries (Mariposa County). 11. Nelson Creek, upstream from confluence with Middle Fork Feather River excluding tributaries (Plumas County). 12. Owens River, from Five Bridges crossing upstream to Pleasant Valley Dam excluding tributaries (Inyo County). 13. Rubicon River, from confluence with Middle Fork American River upstream to Hell Hole Dam excluding tributaries (Placer County). 14. Yellow Creek, from Big Springs downstream to confluence with the North Fork of the Feather River (Plumas County).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft SEIR Chapter 2 Program Description
    1 Chapter 2 2 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 3 2.1 Introduction 4 2.1.1 Program Purpose 5 The purpose of the Proposed Program is to establish and implement a permitting program 6 for suction dredging activities consistent with the requirements of Fish and Game Code 7 section 5653 et seq. and the December 2006 Court Order. 8 2.1.2 Program Objectives 9 The objectives of the Proposed Program are as follows: 10 Comply with the December 2006 Court Order; 11 Promulgate amendments to CDFG’s previous regulations as necessary to 12 effectively implement Fish and Game Code sections 5653 and 5653.9 and other 13 applicable legal authorities to ensure that suction dredge mining will not be 14 deleterious to fish; 15 Develop a program that is implementable within the existing fee structure 16 established by statute for the CDFG’s suction dredge permitting program, as well 17 as the existing fee structure established by the CDFG pursuant to Fish and Game 18 Code section 1600 et seq.; 19 Fulfill CDFG’s mission to manage California's diverse fish, wildlife, and plant 20 resources, and the habitats upon which they depend, for their ecological values 21 and for their use and enjoyment by the public; 22 Ensure that the development of the regulations considers economic costs, 23 practical considerations for implementation, and technological capabilities 24 existing at the time of implementation; and 25 Fulfill the CDFG’s obligation to conserve, protect, and manage fish, wildlife, 26 native plants, and habitats necessary for biologically sustainable populations of 27 those species and as a trustee agency for fish and wildlife resources pursuant to 28 Fish and Game Code section 1802.
    [Show full text]
  • Castaic Lake Water Agency Honby Pipeline Project
    DRAFT Environmental Impact Report California State Clearinghouse No. 2005011071 Castaic Lake Water Agency Honby Pipeline Project April 2005 This page intentionally left blank. DRAFT Environmental Impact Report California State Clearinghouse No. 2005011071 Castaic Lake Water Agency Honby Pipeline Project Prepared for Castaic Lake Water Agency 27234 Bouquet Canyon Road Santa Clarita, California 91350 Prepared by April 2005 525 Anacapa Street, Santa Barbara, California 93101 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Project Objectives ...............................................................................................................1-1 1.3 Intended Uses of the EIR...................................................................................................1-4 1.4 Permits and Other Approvals Required to Implement the Project.............................1-4 1.5 Related Environmental Documentation .........................................................................1-5 1.6 Public Involvement Process..............................................................................................1-5
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    This page intentionally left blank Table of Contents 1. Section 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Overview ................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Hazard Mitigation Planning ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 ............................................................................... 1-1 1.4 Community Rating System – Activity 510 Floodplain Management Planning ....... 1-2 1.5 Local Participants ..................................................................................................... 1-2 1.6 Community Profile ................................................................................................... 1-3 1.6.1 Unincorporated Ventura County................................................................... 1-3 1.6.2 Participating Cities ........................................................................................ 1-3 1.6.3 Participating Special Districts ....................................................................... 1-4 1.7 Description of the Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan ..................................................... 1-6 1.7.1 Section 2: Record of Adoption ..................................................................... 1-6 1.7.2 Section 3: Planning Process .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 111-11
    PUBLIC LAW 111–11—MAR. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 991 Public Law 111–11 111th Congress An Act To designate certain land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the Department of the Mar. 30, 2009 Interior and the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes. [H.R. 146] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Omnibus Public Land SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Management Act (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus of 2009. Public Land Management Act of 2009’’. 16 USC 1 note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I—ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM Subtitle A—Wild Monongahela Wilderness Sec. 1001. Designation of wilderness, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Sec. 1002. Boundary adjustment, Laurel Fork South Wilderness, Monongahela Na­ tional Forest. Sec. 1003. Monongahela National Forest boundary confirmation. Sec. 1004. Enhanced Trail Opportunities. Subtitle B—Virginia Ridge and Valley Wilderness Sec. 1101. Definitions. Sec. 1102. Designation of additional National Forest System land in Jefferson Na­ tional Forest as wilderness or a wilderness study area. Sec. 1103. Designation of Kimberling Creek Potential Wilderness Area, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1104. Seng Mountain and Bear Creek Scenic Areas, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1105. Trail plan and development. Sec. 1106. Maps and boundary descriptions. Sec. 1107. Effective date. Subtitle C—Mt. Hood Wilderness, Oregon Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • 28 Critical Habitat Units for the California Red-Legged Frog In
    28 Critical Habitat Units for the California Red-Legged Frog In response to a 12-20-99, federal court order won by the Center for Biological Diversity, the Jumping Frog Research Institute, the Pacific Rivers Council and the Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service designated 4,138,064 acres of critical habitat for the California red-legged frog. The March 6, 2001 designation is comprised of 29 units spanning 28 California counties. UNIT ACRES COUNTY WATERSHEDS AND OWNERSHIP North Fork Feather 115,939 Butte Drainages within the North Fork Feather River watershed including the River Plumas French Creek watershed. 81% Plumas and Lassen National Forests, 19% mostly private land. Weber 59,531 El Dorado Drainages in Weber Creek and North Fork Cosumnes River watersheds. Creek-Cosumnes 64% private lands, 36% El Dorado National Forest Yosemite 124,336 Tuolumne Tributaries of the Tuolumne River and Jordan Creek, a tributary to the Mariposa Merced River 100% Stanislaus National Forest or Yosemite National Park. Headwaters of 38,300 Tehama Includes drainages within the headwaters of Cottonwood and Red Bank Cottonwood Creek creeks. 82 % private lands, 18% Mendocino National Forest. Cleary Preserve 34,087 Napa Drainages within watersheds forming tributaries to Pope Creek 88% private, 12% federal and state Annadel State Park 6,326 Sonoma Upper Sonoma Creek watershed found partially within Annadel State Preserve Park. 76% private, 24% California Department of Parks and Recreation Stebbins Cold 21,227 Napa Drainages found within and adjacent to Stebbins Cold Canyon Preserve Canyon Preserve Solano and the Quail Ridge Wilderness Preserve including watersheds that form Capell Creek, including Wragg Canyon, Markley Canyon, Steel Canyon and the Wild Horse Canyon watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • SEA Significant Ecological Area
    SEA Program | DRP Page 1 of 17 Skip To Content (#content) SEA • SEA Home (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/) • Proposed SEAS (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/proposed) • SEA Ordinance (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/ordinance) • SEATAC (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/seatac) • SEA History (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/history) • Studies & Resources (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/studies) • SEAs & The General Plan (http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/biological) Significant Ecological Area - Proposed SEAs MARCH 24, 2015 GENERAL PLAN APPROVED AT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: WITH COUNTYWIDE SEA MAP and POLICY The Los Angeles County General Plan Update, including the SEA Program Goals and Policies, Countywide SEA and Coastal Resource Areas Map (Figure 9.3) (“SEA Map”) and SEA Descriptions were approved at public hearing of the Board of Supervisors on March 24th, 2015. • Click here for Final Draft of the General Plan March 24, 2015 (http://planning.lacounty.gov/generalplan/draft) • Click here for the report to the Board (http://planning.lacounty.gov/assets/upl/project/gp_2035_board- letter_20150324.pdf) -Click here for a PDF Copy of Map 9.3 (SEAs & CRAs) (http://planning.lacounty.gov/assets/upl/project/gp_2035_2014-FIG_9-3_significant_ecological_areas.pdf) SEA and Coastal Resource Areas Map/Figure 9.3: FEBRUARY 2015: MINOR CHANGES TO THE COASTAL RESOURCE AREAS TO MATCH THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS LOCAL COASTAL PLAN After the Santa Monica Mountains http://planning.lacounty.gov/sea/proposed 10/18/2017 SEA Program | DRP Page 2 of 17 Local Coastal Plan was adopted minor changes were made to the proposed SEA Map to reflect the final approved boundaries of the Coastal Zone.
    [Show full text]
  • H. R. 2199 [Report No
    IB Union Calendar No. 313 116TH CONGRESS 2D SESSION H. R. 2199 [Report No. 116–390] To designate certain Federal land in the State of California as wilderness, and for other purposes. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES APRIL 10, 2019 Mr. CARBAJAL (for himself, Ms. BROWNLEY of California, Mr. PANETTA, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Mr. HUFFMAN, and Ms. HILL of California) in- troduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Nat- ural Resources FEBRUARY 4, 2020 Additional sponsors: Ms. SPEIER, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. PORTER, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. SHERMAN, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Ms. BARRAGA´N, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Mr. PETERS, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. COSTA, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. LEVIN of California, Mr. CA´RDENAS, Mr. COX of California, Ms. SA´NCHEZ, Mr. AGUILAR, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. ROUDA, Ms. VELA´ZQUEZ, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. SOTO, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Mr. CLAY, Ms. DEGETTE, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. BERA, Ms. WATERS, Mr. CORREA, Mr. HORSFORD, Ms. BASS, and Mr. SWALWELL of California FEBRUARY 4, 2020 Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on April 10, 2019] VerDate Sep 11 2014 20:37 Feb 04, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6652 E:\BILLS\H2199.RH H2199 pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS 2 A BILL To designate certain Federal land in the State of California as wilderness, and for other purposes.
    [Show full text]