Towards XML Transclusions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Towards XML Transclusions Towards XML Transclusions Angelo Di Iorio, Silvio Peroni, Fabio Vitali John Lumley, Tony Wiley Dept. of Computer Science HPLabs Bristol University of Bologna Filton Road, Stoke Gifford Mura Anteo Zamboni, 7 Bristol BS34 8QZ 40127, Bologna, Italy United Kingdom {diiorio | speroni | fabio}@cs.unibo.it {john.lumley | anthony.wiley}@hp.com ABSTRACT Transclusions were the core idea of Xanadu. Xanadu doc- The idea of transclusion has been at the same time the uments were built on-the-fly from fine-grained references so strength and weakness of Xanadu: some people considered that users could access, modify and reuse any fragment from it as an extremely powerful mechanism to get any version any document in a safe and controlled way. The implemen- of any fragment of any document in a global shared docu- tation of transclusions relies on external referencing to lo- ment space, others as a very complex solution too difficult to cations in a text data stream, through complex addressing be actually implemented and delivered. We believe transclu- mechanisms. Mark-up information, links and metadata are sions are still worth implementing and would allow designers expressly distinct from the flow of text in order to guarantee to build very sophisticated hypermedia applications. On the flexibility and expressiveness. other hand, we are aware that the original design of Xanadu cannot be implemented without uprooting current systems, The world of XML (and SGML) relies on a completely differ- protocols and technologies - in primis the World Wide Web ent strategy: mark-up is embedded, documents are strictly and XML. In fact, there is a great distance between the hierarchical and assertions about text fragments are made original data model of transclusions - strongly based on ex- by wrapping them with elements, enriched by attributes. ternal referencing mechanisms - and the XML data model Ted Nelson himself pointed out disadvantages of such an - strongly based on hierarchical structures and embedded approach in relation with transclusions[12]. The three objec- markup. tions he raised can be summarized as: (1) SGML approach This paper investigates to what extent the concept of tran- interposes a ‘forced’ structure between users and actual con- sclusion can be shaped for the world of XML, and stud- tent while editing, (2) SGML approach only supports well- ies simplified models for building functionalities inspired by formed inclusions and does not allow users to change in- Xanadu. Particular attention is given to the support for cluded content, (3) SGML approach does not support over- tracing fragments provenance in multi-source documents and lap and non-hierarchical relationships. for synchronizing distributed content through transclusions. The paper also traces a roadmap to actually implement tran- Thus, these two positions seem to be irreconcilable. The sclusions for XML - identifying three incremental steps - and goal of this paper is to investigate whether and how tran- briefly describes some experimental prototypes. sclusions can be implemented for XML documents and trace a possible course towards that goal. Categories and Subject Descriptors H.5.4 [ INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRE- The preliminary step is to understand what we mean by SENTATION (I.7)]: Hypertext/Hypermedia ‘XML transclusions’. Our goal is not to re-implement a re- vised version of Xanadu based on XML technologies, rather to support users in creating and editing composite XML 1. INTRODUCTION documents that make some Xanalogical functionalities pos- sible. In particular, we are interested in: tracing fragment The concept of transclusion is rooted in the early days of provenance and remote manipulation. First of all, compos- hypertext[13]. A transclusion is a very advanced inclusion, ite XML documents would benefit from rich information whose content is not actually copied but stored as a virtual about the origin of each fragment. That makes it possible to reference to the original source. There is only one copy of identify single contributions in collaboratively edited docu- each fragment in the whole document space and transcluded ments, to display multiple changes in a single document, to data is permanently connected to the original. go back to original resources and navigate documents in a free and powerful way. The permanent connection between transcluded content and original sources would also make possible sophisticated forms of editing. Changes to remote documents could be propagated through transclusions or - the other way round - local modifications could actually up- date remote resources. Yet, such scenarios also require other tricky issues to be addressed such as content merging, syn- chronization, access permissions, reliability and so on. 23 The core of this paper discusses three approaches for imple- The design and implementation of CB-OHS follows the ‘phi- menting XML transclusions, in section 4. These solutions losophy of the primacy of structure over data’[16]. This is use different syntaxes and are progressively expressive and a key feature of the Open Hypermedia approach, strongly powerful. Before that, we briefly review the recent litera- related with the idea of transclusions: the separation be- ture about transclusions and XML. The paper also mentions tween the relationships and the information they relate to. some prototypes we are developing. It makes possible to handle data separately, to create links pointing to read-only reasorces, to create multiple and over- 2. TRANSCLUSIONS AND XML lapped links on the same content and so on. The two most recent research efforts for implementing tran- sclusions are outside the XML universe. Nelson and his 3. A CASE-STUDY: COLLABORATIVE RE- team proposed Transliterature[11] a revision of the original VIEWS Xanadu project built on newer technologies. Transliteral The idea of transcluding fragments from and to XML doc- documents are dynamically built on top of transcluded frag- uments is still under-developed. Hereinafter we discuss a ments, so that rich and fine-grained connections between road-map to make that development possible, by using a documents are permanently available. Two prototypes are case study throughout the paper. worth mentioning: Transquoter, that allows users to hide, highlight and surf multi-source quotations and XanaduS- Let us suppose we are building a system for supporting mul- pace, that provides users a 3D view of the overall document tiple users to write collaborative reviews about movies. It space and shows some of the advanced surfing and display- would be useful to let reviewers quote fragments from other ing functionalities envisioned for such inter-connected doc- reviews, keep trace of their source and maintain a ‘live’ chan- uments. nel between connected fragments. In fact, a review process can be improved by quoting opposite criticism, by letting Kolbitsch at al.[8] investigated transclusions for HTML, pre- reviewers access related reviews, by automatically updating senting a prototype that allows users to select content from distributed reviews with new material and by fostering dis- web pages and transclude them into new documents. Tran- cussion among reviewers. It is worth noting that such an sclusions directives are stored as in-line elements and very idea is both rooted in the early days of hypermedia (the complex URLs. Interesting issues are still open about con- essence itself of hypermedia is the inter-connection between tent addressing and merging, especially considering that web documents) and central in the recent trend of the World pages may change often and may have complex (and badly- Wide Web (one of the milestones of the so-called Web 2.0 is formed) internal structures. just collaboration). The closest solution to transclusions in the XML universe Consider now that reviewers are writing their comments is XInclude[10]. XInclude is a W3C standard for merging about ‘Australia’, starring Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jack- XML documents, by writing inclusion directives and retriev- man1. The film is one of the most controversial of the early ing other (parts of) documents. The focus of XInclude is 2009. David wrote a quite positive review: “Baz Luhrmann’s on well-formed XML fragments. Although even text frag- Australia is good, but not a masterpiece”.2 Brad has an op- ments can be included (parse="text"), XInclude does not posite opinion: “A major miscalculation if there ever was allow users to include bad-formed fragments or ranges. That one”3. Assume that Brad replied to David quoting his orig- makes it impossible to implement fully-fledged transclusions. inal note. In fact, a third reviewer - say Mike - might be Simplified forms of transclusions are possible through XIn- interested in quoting both these opinions, even by citing a clude anyway. XIPr[17] is an implementation of XInclude different comment by a fourth reviewer (for instance, Re- in XSLT 2.0, very efficient and simple to be integrated in becca saying “I actually regret having seen the film through other XML applications. XSLT technologies could be also to the end.”4). Figure 1 shows a possible view of such a used straightforwardly for simplified transclusions: a general composite review, highlighting multiple contributions5. approach is discussed in [5]. The multi-contribution view is only one of the applications XLink[3] could also be cited as a way to transclude pieces of such an advanced quoting. Users might also be given the of content. The @show and @actuate attributes allow users possibility to surf to the original review, in order to col- to define hot-links, that are similar to transclusions apart lect more information about the movie. Moreover, perma- from implementation details. On the other hand, such a nent connections between fragments could be enriched with solution is only partial and XLink does not seem to succeed metadata (stating, for instance, that the remote review is as expected. ‘positive’ or ’negative’), so that advanced search could be performed over the network of documents. Note also that XLink is a relative recent effort, rooted in a very long ex- 1http://www.australiamovie.com/ perience in the hypermedia research.
Recommended publications
  • Approved DITA 2.0 Proposals
    DITA Technical Committee DITA 2.0 proposals DITA TC work product Page 1 of 189 Table of contents 1 Overview....................................................................................................................................................3 2 DITA 2.0: Stage two proposals.................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Stage two: #08 <include> element.................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Stage two: #15 Relax specialization rules......................................................................................... 7 2.3 Stage two: #17 Make @outputclass universal...................................................................................9 2.4 Stage two: #18 Make audience, platform, product, otherprops into specializations........................12 2.5 Stage two: #27 Multimedia domain..................................................................................................16 2.6 Stage two: #29 Update bookmap.................................................................................................... 20 2.7 Stage two: #36 Remove deprecated elements and attributes.........................................................23 2.8 Stage two: #46: Remove @xtrf and @xtrc...................................................................................... 31 2.9 Stage 2: #73 Remove delayed conref domain.................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • XRI 2.0 FAQ 1 December 2005
    XRI 2.0 FAQ 1 December 2005 This document is a comprehensive FAQ on the XRI 2.0 suite of specifications, with a particular emphasis on the XRI Syntax 2.0 Committee Specification which was submitted for consideration as an OASIS Standard on November 14, 2005. 1 General..................................................................................... 3 1.1 What does the acronym XRI stand for? ................................................................3 1.2 What is the relationship of XRI to URI and IRI? ....................................................3 1.3 Why was XRI needed?..........................................................................................3 1.4 Who is involved in the XRI specification effort? ....................................................4 1.5 What is the XRI 2.0 specification suite? ................................................................4 1.6 Are there any intellectual property restrictions on XRI? ........................................4 2 Uses of XRI .............................................................................. 5 2.1 What things do XRIs identify? ...............................................................................5 2.2 What are some example uses of XRI?..................................................................5 2.3 What are some applications that use XRI? ...........................................................5 3 Features of XRI Syntax ........................................................... 6 3.1 What were some of the design requirements
    [Show full text]
  • List of Different Digital Practices 3
    Categories of Digital Poetics Practices (from the Electronic Literature Collection) http://collection.eliterature.org/1/ (Electronic Literature Collection, Vol 1) http://collection.eliterature.org/2/ (Electronic Literature Collection, Vol 2) Ambient: Work that plays by itself, meant to evoke or engage intermittent attention, as a painting or scrolling feed would; in John Cayley’s words, “a dynamic linguistic wall- hanging.” Such work does not require or particularly invite a focused reading session. Kinetic (Animated): Kinetic work is composed with moving images and/or text but is rarely an actual animated cartoon. Transclusion, Mash-Up, or Appropriation: When the supply text for a piece is not composed by the authors, but rather collected or mined from online or print sources, it is appropriated. The result of appropriation may be a “mashup,” a website or other piece of digital media that uses content from more than one source in a new configuration. Audio: Any work with an audio component, including speech, music, or sound effects. CAVE: An immersive, shared virtual reality environment created using goggles and several pairs of projectors, each pair pointing to the wall of a small room. Chatterbot/Conversational Character: A chatterbot is a computer program designed to simulate a conversation with one or more human users, usually in text. Chatterbots sometimes seem to offer intelligent responses by matching keywords in input, using statistical methods, or building models of conversation topic and emotional state. Early systems such as Eliza and Parry demonstrated that simple programs could be effective in many ways. Chatterbots may also be referred to as talk bots, chat bots, simply “bots,” or chatterboxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Boot Camp Week 1 (Custom for Liberty)
    "Charting the Course ... ... to Your Success!" Web Boot Camp Week 1 (Custom for Liberty) Course Summary Description This class is designed for students that have experience with HTML5 and CSS3 and wish to learn about, JavaScript and jQuery and AngularJS. Topics Introduction to the Course Designing Responsive Web Applications Introduction to JavaScript Data Types and Assignment Operators Flow Control JavaScript Events JavaScript Objects JavaScript Arrays JavaScript Functions The JavaScript Window and Document Objects JavaScript and CSS Introduction to jQuery Introduction to jQuery UI jQuery and Ajax Introduction to AngularJS Additional AngularJS Topics The Angular $http Service AngularJS Filters AngularJS Directives AngularJS Forms Testing JavaScript Introduction to AngularJS 2 Prerequisites Prior knowledge of HTML5 and CSS3 is required. Duration Five days Due to the nature of this material, this document refers to numerous hardware and software products by their trade names. References to other companies and their products are for informational purposes only, and all trademarks are the properties of their respective companies. It is not the intent of ProTech Professional Technical Services, Inc. to use any of these names generically "Charting the Course ... ... to Your Success!" TDP Web Week 1: HTML5/CSS3/JavaScript Programming Course Outline I. Introduction to the Course O. Client-Side JavaScript Objects A. TDP Web Bootcamp Week 1, 2016 P. Embedding JavaScript in HTML B. Legal Information Q. Using the script Tag C. TDP Web Bootcamp Week 1, 2016 R. Using an External File D. Introductions S. Defining Functions E. Course Description T. Modifying Page Elements F. Course Objectives U. The Form Submission Event G. Course Logistics V.
    [Show full text]
  • Autonomous Agents on the Web
    Report from Dagstuhl Seminar 21072 Autonomous Agents on the Web Edited by Olivier Boissier1, Andrei Ciortea2, Andreas Harth3, and Alessandro Ricci4 1 Ecole des Mines – St. Etienne, FR, [email protected] 2 Universität St. Gallen, CH, [email protected] 3 Fraunhofer IIS – Nürnberg, DE, [email protected] 4 Università di Bologna, IT, [email protected] Abstract The World Wide Web has emerged as the middleware of choice for most distributed systems. Recent standardization efforts for the Web of Things and Linked Data are now turning hypermedia into a homogeneous information fabric that interconnects everything – devices, information resources, abstract concepts, etc. The latest standards allow clients not only to browse and query, but also to observe and act on this hypermedia fabric. Researchers and practitioners are already looking for means to build more sophisticated clients able to meet their design objectives through flexible autonomous use of this hypermedia fabric. Such autonomous agents have been studied to large extent in research on distributed artificial intelligence and, in particular, multi-agent systems. These recent developments thus motivate the need for a broader perspective that can only be achieved through a concerted effort of the research communities on the Web Architecture and the Web of Things, Semantic Web and Linked Data, and Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. The Dagstuhl Seminar 21072 on “Autonomous Agents on the Web” brought together leading scholars and practitioners across these research areas in order to support the transfer of knowledge and results – and to discuss new opportunities for research on Web-based autonomous systems. This report documents the seminar’s program and outcomes.
    [Show full text]
  • Freenet-Like Guids for Implementing Xanalogical Hypertext
    Freenet-like GUIDs for Implementing Xanalogical Hypertext Tuomas J. Lukka Benja Fallenstein Hyperstructure Group Oberstufen-Kolleg Dept. of Mathematical Information Technology University of Bielefeld, PO. Box 100131 University of Jyvaskyl¨ a,¨ PO. Box 35 D-33501 Bielefeld FIN-40351 Jyvaskyl¨ a¨ Germany Finland [email protected] lukka@iki.fi ABSTRACT For example, an email quoting another email would be automati- We discuss the use of Freenet-like content hash GUIDs as a prim- cally and implicitly connected to the original via the transclusion. itive for implementing the Xanadu model in a peer-to-peer frame- Bidirectional, non-breaking external links (content linking) can be work. Our current prototype is able to display the implicit con- resolved through the same mechanism. Nelson[9] argues that con- nection (transclusion) between two different references to the same ventional software, unable to reflect such interconnectivity of doc- permanent ID. We discuss the next layers required in the implemen- uments, is unsuited to most human thinking and creative work. tation of the Xanadu model on a world-wide peer-to-peer network. In order to implement the Xanadu model, it must be possible to efficiently search for references to permanent IDs on a large scale. The original Xanadu design organized content IDs in a DNS-like Categories and Subject Descriptors hierarchical structure (tumblers), making content references arbi- H.5.4 [Information Interfaces and Presentation]: Hypertext/Hy- trary intervals (spans) in the hierarchy. Advanced tree-like data permedia—architectures; H.3.4 [Information Storage and Retrie- structures[6] were used to retrieve the content efficiently.
    [Show full text]
  • Angularjs Workbook
    AngularJS Workbook Exercises take you to mastery By Nicholas Johnson version 0.1.0 - beta Image credit: San Diego Air and Space Museum Archives Welcome to the Angular Workbook This little book accompanies the Angular course taught over 3 days. Each exercise builds on the last, so it's best to work through these exercises in order. We start out from the front end with templates, moving back to controllers. We'll tick off AJAX, and then get into building custom components, filters, services and directives. After covering directives in some depth we'll build a real app backed by an open API. By the end you should have a pretty decent idea of what is what and what goes where. Template Exercises The goal of this exercise is just to get some Angular running in a browser. Getting Angular We download Angular from angularjs.org Alternately we can use a CDN such as the Google Angular CDN. Activating the compiler Angular is driven by the template. This is different from other MVC frameworks where the template is driven by the app. In Angular we modify our app by modifying our template. The JavaScript we write simply supports this process. We use the ng-app attribute (directive) to tell Angular to begin compiling our DOM. We can attach this attribute to any DOM node, typically the html or body tags: 1 <body ng-app> 2 Hello! 3 </body> All the HTML5 within this directive is an Angular template and will be compiled as such. Linking from a CDN Delivering common libraries from a shared CDN can be a good idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Topincs Using Transclusion to Connect Proxy Spaces
    Connecting Topincs Using transclusion to connect proxy spaces Robert Cerny Anton-Kubernat-Straße 15, A-2512 Oeynhausen, Austria [email protected] http://www.cerny-online.com Abstract. Topincs is a software system for agile and distributed knowledge management on top of the common web infrastructure and the Topic Maps Data Model. It segments knowledge into stores and offers users a way to establish a temporary connection between stores through transclusion and merging. This allows to easily copy topics and statements. Through this mechanism, later acts of integration are simplified, due to matching item identifiers. Furthermore, transclusion can be used to create permanent connections between stores. 1 Introduction A Topincs store [5, 6, 10] is a knowledge repository for an individual or a group to make statements about subjects. It uses the Topic Maps Data Model [7] for representing knowledge. Throughout this paper we will illustrate crucial aspects by the example of a small fictional software company, called Modestsoft. It employs around 10 people and has various departments, including development, testing, and sales & services. Modestsoft uses several shared Topincs stores to manage its organizational knowledge. Those stores deal with Modestsoft’s staff, products, issues, clients, and their configurations, to name only a few. Additionally, every employee has his own store. While the shared stores have a clear boundary around their domain, the personal stores may contain topics and statements of a wider variety and are considered a repository for note taking, and as such they function as a memory extender [4]. Figure 1 illustrates Modestsoft’s setup and the Topincs stores they use to manage their spontaneous knowledge recording demands.
    [Show full text]
  • What Can Software Learn from Hypermedia?
    What Can Software Learn From Hypermedia? Philip Tchernavskij Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose Michel Beaudouin-Lafon LRI, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, Digital Deisgn & Information Studies, LRI, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, Inria, Université Paris-Saclay Aarhus University Inria, Université Paris-Saclay Orsay 43017-6221, France Aarhus N 8200, Denmark Orsay 43017-6221, France [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT procedures, or working materials in the physical world, these dimen- Most of our interactions with the digital world are mediated by sions of flexibility are limited or nonexistent in computer-mediated apps: desktop, web, or mobile applications. Apps impose artificial activity. These limitations are especially evident as software has limitations on collaboration among users, distribution across de- become ubiquitous in our social and professional lives. vices, and the changing procedures that constantly occur in real In general, apps model procedures, in the sense that they couple work. These limitations are partially due to the engineering prin- what users can do, e.g., changing color, with what they can do it ciples of encapsulation and program-data separation. By contrast, to, e.g., text. Some apps supports collaborating on a particular task, the field of hypermedia envisions collaboration, distribution and but limit the available tools and working materials. Some apps can flexible practices as fundamental features of software. We discuss be extended with new tools, but are highly specialized, e.g., for shareable dynamic media, an alternative model for software that illustration or programming. Apps can only be combined in limited unifies hypermedia and interactive systems, and Webstrates, an ways, e.g., it is possible to work on an image in two image treatment experimental implementation of that model.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9: the Forms of Resource Descriptions
    Chapter 9 The Forms of Resource Descriptions Ryan Shaw Murray Maloney 9.1. Introduction . 467 9.2. Structuring Descriptions . 469 9.3. Writing Descriptions . 492 9.4. Worlds of Description . 501 9.5. Key Points in Chapter Nine . 508 9.1 Introduction Throughout this book, we have emphasized the importance of separately consid­ ering fundamental organizing principles, application-specific concepts, and de­ tails of implementation. The three-tier architecture we introduced in §1.6 is one way to conceptualize this separation. In §6.7, we contrasted the implementation-focused perspective for analyzing relationships with other per­ spectives that focus on the meaning and abstract structure of relationships. In this chapter, we present this contrast between conceptualization and implemen­ tation in terms of separating the content and form of resource descriptions. In the previous chapters, we have considered principles and concepts of organ­ izing in many different contexts, ranging from personal organizing systems to cultural and institutional ones. We have noted that some organizing systems have limited scope and expected lifetime, such as a task-oriented personal or­ ganizing system like a shopping list. Other organizing systems support broad uses that rely on standard categories developed through rigorous processes, like a product catalog. By this point you should have a good sense of the various conceptual issues you need to consider when deciding how to describe a resource in order to meet the The Discipline of Organizing goals of your organizing system. Considering those issues will give you some sense of what the content of your descriptions should be. In order to focus on the conceptual issues, we have deferred discussion of specific implementation issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Historically, Cross-Origin Interactions, Through Hyperlinks
    Historically, cross-origin interactions, through hyperlinks, transclusion and form submission, were the most important and distinguishing features of HTTP, HTML and the World Wide Web. As the Web moved from being composed of static markup and resources rendered by the user agent to also include active content, through plug-ins and embedded scripting, and client-side state, through cookies, it quickly became clear that unrestricted cross-origin interactions presented serious privacy and security risks. To deal with these risks, user agents and plugin technologies introduced a set of restrictions generally known as the Same Origin Policy. (SOP) Though many variants of the SOP exist, they all generally 1) preserved the existing cross-origin interactions allowed by HTML and HTTP while 2) restricting the ability of active content to read or make new types of requests across origins. This specification allows resources to voluntarily relax these restrictions. To do so safely, it is important to understand both 1) the pre-existing security impacts of cross- origin requests allowed by the legacy architecture of the Web as well as 2) the distinction between the goal of this specification: authorizing cross-origin read access to a resource in the user agent, and the possibly unintended consequences of authorizing write/execute access to resources by applications from foreign origins executing in the user agent. In this specification, A simple cross-origin requestst has beenare defined as congruent the set of HTTP methods, headers and data which may with those which may be generated sent cross-origin by currently deployed user agents that do not implement CORS.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperwell: Local-First, Collaborative Notebooks for Digital Annotation
    Hyperwell: Local-First, Collaborative Notebooks for Digital Annotation A thesis presented for the degree of Master of Science by Jan Kaßel [email protected] 3724135 at the Institute of Computer Science Universität Leipzig, Germany May 4, 2020 Advisor & First Examiner Second Examiner Dr. Thomas Köntges Prof. Gregory Crane Chair of Digital Humanities Department of Classical Studies Leipzig University Tufts University Except where otherwise noted, content in this thesis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License¹, which permits un- restricted adaption, use, and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited the resulting work is licensed under the same terms as the original. The source code of all Hyperwell repositories is available as open-source soft- ware, licensed under the more permissive MIT License. Copyright 2020, Jan Kaßel. 1. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Table of Contents Abstract i Acknowledgements ii List of Abbreviations iii List of Figures iv 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation: A Question of Ownership ................ 3 1.2 Research Goals and Affiliated Work ................. 4 1.3 Synopsis ................................ 5 2 Related Work 7 2.1 Hypertext and Annotation ....................... 7 2.2 Digital Real-Time Collaboration ................... 10 2.3 Linked Data and Digital Humanities . 12 2.4 Peer-to-Peer Networks ........................ 16 2.5 Local-First Applications ........................ 20 3 Study: Exploring Collaborative Workflows 22 3.1 Study Framework ........................... 25 3.2 Analyzing Digital Workflows ..................... 27 3.3 Setting and Observations ....................... 30 3.4 Results ................................. 32 4 Peer-to-Peer Annotation 35 4.1 What’s (Not) Wrong with Servers? .
    [Show full text]