(Pandion Haliaetus) in Utah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Pandion Haliaetus) in Utah Great Basin Naturalist Volume 56 Number 2 Article 6 4-29-1996 Geographical review of the historical and current status of Ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) in Utah Clark S. Monson Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Monson, Clark S. (1996) "Geographical review of the historical and current status of Ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) in Utah," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 56 : No. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol56/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Great Basin Naturalist 56(2), © 1996, pp. 150-156 GEOGRAPHICAL REVIEW OF THE HISTORICAL AND CURRENT STATUS OF OSPREYS (PANDION HALIAETUS) IN UTAH Clark S. Monson1 ABSTRACT,-Small numbers of Ospreys (Pandion lUlliaetus) are known to have nested historically in Utah. A precise baseline figure is unavailable, but the 19th-century Osprey population in Utah probably consisted ofat least 15 breeding pairs scattered in 4 geographic regions. Human persecution is believed to have caused the abandonment ofnesting ter­ ritories along the Wasatch Front and in the western Uinta Mountains by 1900 and 1960, respectively. Osprey popula­ tions in the southern plateaus and Green River areas, however, began increasing in the late 1970s. Several recent nesting attempts and numerous summer sightings at nontraditional and abandoned historical sites in Utah suggest the Osprey is also expanding its range in Utah. High productivity for local pairs and long-range dispersal from more northerly Osprey populations are discussed as sources for the current surge in Utah's Osprey population, which now consists of approxi­ mately 35 breeding pairs. Key words: Osprey, Pandion haliaetus, raptor, Flaming Gorge Reservoir, dispersal. The Osprey (Pandion haliaetwJ) is one ofthe their range in Utah. This paper reviews histor­ most widely distributed species ofraptors dur­ ical Osprey breeding territories in Utah, sub­ ing the breeding period. The extent of its cos­ sequent population declines, and current mopolitan range is exceeded by only 2 other Osprey population and range expansion in raptors: tbe Peregrine Falcon (Falco peregri­ Utah. nWi) (Cade 1982, del Hoyo et al. 1994) and Barn Owl (Tyto alha) (Marti 1985, Eckert and GEOGRAPHIC HISTORY OF THE Karalus 1987). Despite tbe Osprey's broad OSPREY IN UTAH geographic distribution, local populations occur in fragmented and low densities in much of Nesting Ospreys have been reported from the species' range (Bent 1937, Palmer 1988, del 4 geographical areas of Utah (Fig. 1): the Hoyo et al. 1994). This scenario holds true for Wasatch Front, Uinta Mountains, southern pla­ most of the intermountain region of the west­ teaus, and Green River (Table 1). Accounts of ern United States (Henny 1986, Johnsgard early ornithologists, naturalists, and egg col­ 1990). In Utah, Osprey distribution has been lectors indicate the Osprey was a regular sum­ particularly limited. Recently, however, several mer resident and breeder in Utah. Allen (1872) personal summer observations of Ospreys over found them along the Great Salt Lake marshes 140 km from known breeding pairs prompted west of Ogden, and Hensbaw (1874) saw them an investigation into the possible occurrence of at Utall Lake near Provo. Neither discussed Ospreys at other nontraditional Utalliocalities. nest observations in these areas, but R. G. Bee A survey ofindividuals from the U.S. Forest (unpublished ornithological notes) mentioned Service, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, that Ospreys formerly nested along the sbores Utah State Parks, and otber persons familiar and tributaries of Utah Lake (Fig. 1; Table 1, with Osprey ecology was conducted during region A). 1994-95. The survey revealed many Osprey Other records were for the Uinta Mountains sightings and several nesting attempts between (Fig. 1; Table 1, region B).]. D. Daynes (unpub­ 1 June and 15 August at numerous lakes, res­ lished ornithological notes) described the ervoirs, and rivers from nearly every region of repeated use of an Osprey nest from 1915 to the state since 1990. These sigbtings represent 1938 on tbe Weber River, 20 km east of Oak­ the first widespread effort by Ospreys to expand ley, Summit County. Also, Hayward (1931) JDepltrhncnl ofGeogruphy, Brigham Young lIniv6nity. Provo. VI' 84602-5526. 150 1996] OSPREY STATUS IN UTAH 151 I , o kilometers 80 ., \ : ~.. •• , •• ,~ , ! • ,. • ~-- .. Fig. 1. Known historical distribution of nesting Ospreys in Utah: A. Wasatch Front; B, western Uinta Mountains; C. southern plate."\us; D, Green River. surveyed (8 July-21 August 1930) birds in the and Hutchings (1942) specifically cite Mirror western Uinlas where Summit, Duchesne, and and Trial lakes as having Osprey nests, Twomey Wasatch counties converge. While not giving (1942: 382) visited an occupied nest between actual locations, he said a few Ospreys nested 16 and 20 July 1932 at the north end of Mirror in the Mirror and Tryol [sic] lakes region. Bee Lake, "Wasatch County." This nest was actually 152 GREAT BASIN NATURALIST [Volume 56 TABLE L Nesting populations ofOspreys in Utah. S1~TUS Hegion IIistorical pairs Current pairs Historical Events A: Wasatch l<i'ont Unknown 1 Although numerous records ofOspreys nest­ ing in Utah exist, these birds have apparently B: Uinta Mountins 5-8 0 undergone 2 separate declines. The 1st decline c: Southern plateaus 2-4 8-11 involved Ospreys nesting along the Wasatch Front (Fig. 1). During winter 1848-49, depreda­ 20-25 D: Green River 6-8 tions upon livestock, poultry, and grain led to a much-puhlicized contest to kill the "wasters and destroyers" (Arrington 1958: 51). Hundreds of mammalian predators and thousands of raptors in Duchesne County and perhaps the same were killed (Arrington 1958). Ospreys would nest Hayward et al. (1976) referred to when have been on their southern v.rintering grounds they listed Wasatch County as a former nest­ during this assault on local predators, but the ing area. R. G. Bee (unpnblished ornithological incident suggests that early pioneers in Utah notes) also cited single pairs at Fish, Scout, and treated all carnivores and birds of prey with Lily lakes in the western Uintas. On 23 May contempt. Other similar hunts followed, and 40 1945, Bee recorded that a game warden in years later the Utal, Legislature implemented a Duchesne informed him of 2 pairs at Moon law awarding bounties for the killing of preda­ Lake and another pair at an unidentified Uinta tors (Rawley 1985). Rewards were available for lake. several species of fish~eating birds including Other early observers of Osprey nests in Ospreys. The destruction that this bounty in­ Utah include Wolfe and Cottam (Hayward et flicted upon fish-eating hirds in the name of al. 1976), who, along with Bee and Hutchings "conservation" was significant and is vividly (1942), saw Ospreys nest at Fish Lake (not the described by Pritchett et al. (1981). Uinta Mountains lake with the same name), The attitudes ofearly residents toward pred­ Sevier County, beginning in 1928 (Fig. 1; Table ators, coupled with laws encouraging their 1, region C). On 18 July 1936, R. G. Bee (un­ destruction, may have led to the Osprey's published ornithological notes) visited the Fish extirpation from the \Vasatch Front (Fig. 1; Lake nest. A local rancher told him Ospreys Table 1, region A) around the turn of the cen­ had used that particular nesting site for at tury. In 1935, R. G. Bee (unpublished ornitho­ least 20 years. logical notes) speculated that human persecu­ tion caused the abandonment of Osprey nests Behle et al. (1958) noted a pair of Ospreys near Utah Lake. Bee did not record when these in southwestern Utah at Navajo Lake, Kane Ospreys disappeared, hut his manner of re­ County, on 17 and 18 June 1950 (Fig. 1; Table flection on their absence suggests the loss 1, region C). This particular territory (and an occurred well before his 1935 notation. additional site at nearby Panguitch Lake, The 2nd period ofOsprey decline occurred Garfield County) bas been used regularly since in the western Uinta Mountains (Fig. 1). The Behle's discovery (Eyre and Paol 1973, Salt Uinta Mountain nests that Daynes, Bee, Hay­ Lake Tribune, 13 August 1978, Walters 1981, ward, and Twomey reported were observed Anonymous 1989). before, but apparently not after, the 1950s and Ospreys also nested along the Green River, 1960s when Osprey colonies along the eastern northeastern Utah (Fig. 1; Table 1, region D). seaboard were decimated by organochlorine On 23 and 24 July 1959, C. M. White and C. compounds (Palmer 1988, Poole 1989). Although Bosley (White and Behle 1960) located 2 nests the impact of synthetic agricultural biocides along this river in Horseshoe Canyon, Daggett upon Ospreys in Utah is unknown, Ospreys in County. Both nests contained 2 young. An other areas of the western United States were additional nest was discovered on the Green generally less affected by environmental con­ River in Uintah County by M, Horton in June taminants than eastern populations (Poole 1974 (Behle 1981). White (1969) suggested the 1989, White 1994). total population of Ospreys nesting along the Another possible reason for the decline of Green River probably consisted of6-8 pairs. Ospreys in the Uinta Mountains is indiscrimi- 1996] OSPREY STATUS IN UTAH 153 nate shooting resulting from a hostile attitude hatchery, Wasatch County (Fig. 2A). In 1995 a by local residents (Bee unpublished ornitho­ 2nd pair built a nest 2 km away at Deer Creek logical notes, Twomey 1942). Many Ospreys Reservoir on a 5-m-high artificial platform were formerly shot at northern Utah fish erected for Ospreys (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • UCRC Annual Report for Water Year 2019
    SEVENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT OF THE UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 2 UPPER COLORADO RIVER COMMISSION 355 South 400 East • Salt Lake City, UT 84111 • 801-531-1150 • www.ucrcommission.com June 1, 2021 President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. The White House Washington, D.C. 20500 Dear President Biden: The Seventy-Second Annual Report of the Upper Colorado River Commission, as required by Article VIII(d)(13) of the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact of 1948 (“Compact”), is enclosed. The report also has been transmitted to the Governors of each state signatory to the Compact, which include Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming and Arizona. The budget of the Commission for Fiscal Year 2021 (July 1, 2020 – June 30, 2021) is included in this report as Appendix B. Respectfully yours, Amy I. Haas Executive Director and Secretary Enclosure 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .................................................................................................. 8 COMMISSIONERS .................................................................................... 9 ALTERNATE COMMISSIONERS ........................................................... 10 OFFICERS OF THE COMMISSION ....................................................... 10 COMMISSION STAFF ............................................................................. 10 COMMITTEES ......................................................................................... 11 LEGAL COMMITTEE ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cogjm Usdi New Rel 1969-06-11.Pdf (170.1Kb)
    UNITED STArrES DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR * * * * * * * * * * * * * ********news release BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Region 4, Solt Lake City, Utah Telephone: 524-5403 For release: Wednesday, June 11, 1969 BELOW NORMAL APRIL-JULY COLORADO RIVER RUNOFF OF 7.4 Ml LU ON ACRE-FEET FORECAST Moy hos been the third consecutive month of subnormal precipitation in the Colorado River Basin above Lees Ferry, causing the April-July runoff forecast to foll to 7.4 million acre-feet or 87 percent of normal, the Bureau of Reclamation announced today. An even lower runoff forecast is avoided only by the presence of above normal snow accumulations in the high mountains. Another milestone was reached lost month in the uti lization of water of the Colorado River in the Upper Basin . On Thursday night, Moy 29, 1969, water stored in Lake Powell reached elevation 3570 feet, which is "roted head" for the powerplont located at the toe of Glen Canyon Dom . "Roted head" is the lowest level at which water flowing through the turbines con drive the generators at their nameplate capacity. With normal rai nfall, it is expected that Lake Powell 's water surface should reach on all-time high in July at about elevation 3580 feet with a live storage of about 10,290,000 acre-feet. Planned releases from Lake Powell for water year 1969 ore about 8 . 8 million ocre­ feet. For the next 3 years thereafter annual releases should be near this amount in order to deliver Colorado River Compact requirements to the Lower Basin. The entire release wi 11 be used to generate power for power customers in both the Upper and Lower Bosi ns.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin River Rim Trail Access from I-15 Take Exit 59 for UT-56/200 North
    Getting There From Cedar City to Te-ah: Approximately 32 miles The Virgin River Rim Trail Access From I-15 take Exit 59 for UT-56/200 North. Proceed east The Virgin River Rim Trail winds through 32 miles of some on 200 North for 1 mile to the intersection with Main of the most spectacular scenery southern Utah has to Virgin River The Virgin River Rim Trail can be accessed from several Street. Turn right onto Main Street and head south for 0.2 offer. From stunning pink cliffs, to verdant high altitude points depending on how far, and which direction you wish miles to the intersection with Center Street/University forests, the trail offers a little something for everyone. to travel. Blvd/UT-14. Turn left onto Center Street/UT-14 and Rim Trail continue southeast on UT-14 for 25.3 miles to the junction The trail is long and can be quite rigorous at points so From Strawberry Point N 37° 26.177’ W 112° 42.684’ with Navajo Lake Road/Forest Road #053. Turn right onto most people choose to only enjoy a portion at a time. The From Cascade Falls N 37° 29.837’ W 112° 45.096’ Navajo Lake Road and continue 5.7 miles. After you pass following suggestions are provided to help you find the From Te-ah (Navajo Lake) N 37° 32.020’ W 112° 49.300’ Te-Ah campground but before you take the sweeping left adventure you are looking for during your visit to the Dixie Cedar City From Woods Ranch N 37° 35.643’ W 112° 54.980’ turn to the south you will see a pull out and a trailhead National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Corners Regional
    «¬96 ¤£191 ¤£40 «¬46 287 «¬79 UTAH ¬131 «¬9 ¤£6 40 ¤£ COLORADO«¬36 36 ¤£89 « «¬103 ¤£ ¨¦§225 ¤£ ¬264 «¬74 «¬132 « 70 177 «¬13 §¨¦ 6 «¬5 «¬ 1 Four Corners National Monument 117 ¤£ 1 Four«¬75 Corners«¬88 National«¬470 Monument «¬ 116 2 Hovenweep National Monument «¬78 «¬ 124 139 2 Canyons of the Ancients National Monument Four«¬ Corners«¬ Regional Map 9 3 Bluff Fort «¬ 3 «¬ 121Lowry¤£85 Pueblo 4 Valley of the Gods «¬31 4 Cortez 155 ¤£285 5 Goosenecks State Park 125 «¬ 5 Canyons of the Ancients Visitor Center «¬ 105 6 Goulding's Trading Post Museum «¬29 «¬91 6 Mesa«¬ Verde National Park 28 www.aztecnm.com 1-888-543-4629 7 La Plata Canyon 83 «¬86 7 The Dinosaur Museum «¬ «¬67 «¬ ¤£6 57 ¤£6 8 Durango - Silverton Narrow Gauge Railroad 8 Edge of the Cedars State Park «¬ 330 ¤£50 «¬ 9 Chimney Rock National Monument 9 Natural Bridges National Monument ¤£50 )"15 «¬82 9 ¬64 «¬ 10 Pagosa Springs 10 Newspaper Rock State Park « ¤£6 ¤£6 65 133 ¤£24 11 Silverton «¬217 11 Canyonlands National Park (East«¬100 Entrance) «¬10 «¬ «¬ )"18 «¬6 «¬141 12 Ouray 12 Canyonlands«¬257 National Park (North Entrance) 13 Telluride «¬21 13 Hole in the Rock 14 Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Park 14 Arches National Park §¨¦70 15 Dinosaur Journey¤£24 (Museum of Western«¬94 Colorado) 15 Dead Horse Point State Park133 119 16«¬67 Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve «¬ «¬ «¬9 «¬21 16 Goblin Valley State Park ¤£89 «¬128 «¬135 17 Little Wild Horse Canyon «¬141 115 «¬313 «¬348 «¬ 18 John Wesley Powell River History Museum «¬72 )"14 Colorado Scenic Byways )"17)"16
    [Show full text]
  • Map 2B: New Mexico Public Lands Highlights No Identified Conflicts
    Examination of New Mexico Public Lands in regards to the Wild Horse Act (NMSA 77-18-5, 2007) 109°0'0"W 108°0'0"W 107°0'0"W 106°0'0"W 105°0'0"W 104°0'0"W 103°0'0"W 37°0'0"N 37°0'0"N Sugarite Canyon State Park 87 84 Edward Sargent Wildlife Management Area ¤£ Navajo Axtell ¤£ Rio De Los Pinos Wildlife Area Punche Valley WHA Jicarilla Raton Unknown State Land (OID 1119) ¤£64 Carracas Mesa WHA 5 Acres:160 ¤£84 Urraca Wildlife Management Area 64 Unknown State Land (OID 1116) William A. Humphries Wildlife Management Area ¤£ Jackson Lake Wildlife Management Area Aztec Acres: 477 64 ¤£ 5 87 Navajo Lake State Park ¤£285 ¤£ ¤£64 ¤£85 5Farmington Ancones SAN JUA Phase I (Unknown State Land; OID 1121) N R IVER £64 Tierra Amarilla ¤ 5 Acres: 2220 Heron Lake State Park Red River State Hatchery Elliott Barker Wildlife Management Area ¤£64 Clayton Lake State Park 25 Colfax §¨¦ ¤£64 El Vado Lake State Park Rio Chama Wildlife Management Area Tres Piedras WMA ¤£64 Jarita Mesa WHT Vallecitos Refuge (OID 1120) Cimarron Canyon State Park ¤£64 Acres: 132 Union Eagle Nest Lake State Park Clayton San Juan Rio Arriba Taos ¤£87 Colin Neblett Wildlife Management Area 5 ¤£64 ¤£87 Mesa de las Viegas WHT (Inactive) 85 ¤£ £56 C 5 ¤ H Taos A Mesa Montosa (Inactive) C O ¤£285 56 R 84 ¤£ I ¤£ V E R Coyote Creek State Park (OID 1081) Acres: 456 R IO C H A Charette Lake Fishing Area M A ¤£491 ¤£550 Circle A Ranch 36°0'0"N Mora Wagon Mound Wildlife Management Area Espanola 36°0'0"N Chicoma WHT (Inactive) 5 Unknown State Land (OID 1117) Mora Acres: 7306 5 ¤£85 Bluebird WMA
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Navajo Lake 7.5' Quadrangle in Cooperation with U
    UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of the Utah Department of Natural Resources in cooperation with U. S. Geological Survey Plate 1 and Utah Geological Survey Map 199 National Park Service Geologic Map of the Navajo Lake 7.5' Quadrangle Kscu Kscu TKcc Qal Qmt2 Tcw W W Qal W W 2 2 Qal Qal Qmt Qc Qc Qms Qc / / 9 1 1 Qmt 8 Qc Qms 8 8 Tcr R Qal Qes Tcw R Tcw R R Qmt2 Qal TKcc Qf Qmt TKcc Qc 1 TKcc TKcc Tcr Qal Qmt2 Tcw Qbf1 Qbf1 Kscu Qmt1 Qes Qal Tcr Qc Qms Qmt1 Qmt1 Qmt 1 Qmt1 Qmt1 Kscu 3 2 Tcr Qes Qal 2 NNL-17 Tcw Tbh A' 3 Tcw Qac Qes Tbh Qbv1 Qmt1 2 Tcw 2 cr Tcw T Tcr Qal TKcc Qes Qmt Tcw 1 Tcw Qal Qms Tcw Qc Qc 1 Tcw Qbf1 Qmt1 Tbh Qmt1 1 2 Qmt Qc Tcr Qal Qal 1 Qcv 2 Qcv Qmt1 TKcc Qcv Tbh Tm Qaf1 A Tcr TKcc Qc Tm Qmt Qcv 1 Qac Qbf Tcr 1 2 Tm Qbf1 Tbh Tcr Qms Qal Tm Qcv Tcr 2 Qal Tbh Qcv Qo TKcc Qms Qal Tcr Qo TKcc Tcr Qmt1 Qo Qac Tcr Qac TKcc Qat2 NNL-16 Tbh Qac Qac Tcr Qms Qcv NNL-13 Qbf3 4 Qcv NNL-12 Qbf4 Qac Qal TKcc Qbc Qmt Qcv 3 2 Qcv Qcv Tbh Qbf Qf 3 3 Qcv Qcv 3 Qal Tcr Qac Qcv Tcr Tcr Qmt 2 Qac Qal Qf Qal Qmt 2 Qc Qac Qf Qcv Qat Qmt2 1 QTrg Qmt2 Qc Qc Tcr Qbf1 Qmt2 Tcr Qcv Qc Tcr Qac Qal Qcv Tcr Qcv TKcc Tcr Tcr QTrg Qcv Qac Qc Qac 4 Qat1 3 Tbh Qal Qal Qat2 Qat1 Qc Qac QTrg Qmt2 QTrg Qal Qc Qc Qac Qat2 Qo Qcv Qaf Qat2 1 Qac Qac Qc Qac Qaf1 Qac Qac Qc Qc QTrg NNL-3 Qbv1 TKcc QTrg QTrg Qal Qal Qmt2 Qaf2 Qaf2 Qac Qc Qmt1 Qac Qac TKcc Qmt Qaf2 1 Qc Qat1 Qaf2 TKcc Qac Kscu Qat Qaf Qac 2 2 Qmt2 Qmt1 Qaf Tcr 2 Qal Qac Qc Qmt1 Qaf2 Qc Qbc3 Qmt 1 Tcr TKcc Tcr Qal Qc Qmt2 Qbf3 Kscu TKcc Qc Qc Qms Qal Qbf Qac 1 Qmt2 Qbf1 Qac Qbf3 Qbc Qal 3 Qal
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking H Iking R Em Inders Trails
    North on Piedra Road (CR 600 FS 631) South Highway 84 EASY MODERATE DIFFICULT EASY MODERATE DIFFICULT 12. PIEDRA RIVER TRAIL (#596) 19. QUARTZ LAKE VIA LITTLE BLANCO TRAIL (#572) & Beautiful box canyons along the Piedra River. QUARTZ LAKE TRAIL (#568) To get there: Access point #1 - Piedra Road North (CR 600 Sweeping Panoramic views of the west. /FS 631) for 16 miles; after crossing the Piedra River, the To get there: Hwy 84 South for 1/8 mile; left on Mill Creek Road parking lot is on the left. Trailhead elevation is 7,700 feet. (CR 302 /FS 662) for 7 miles; right on Nipple Mountain Road (FS Access point #2 - Hwy 160 West for 22 miles; turn right on 665) 9.5 miles. Trailhead is on the left, elevation is 10,040 feet. First Fork Road (FS 622), continue 12 miles to the road’s end, The Hike: The first two miles of the Little Blanco Trail are trailhead elevation is 7,200. steep and winding. The trail enters the South San Juan The Hike: 12 miles from trailhead to trailhead. An easy trail Wilderness area at 2.5 miles. Follow the trail ½ mile to the for all ages, just set the distance accordingly. From Piedra junction of the Quartz Lake Trail. The Quartz Creek Trail Road, the trail starts on the canyon rim and then descends continues to the left for 1 mile north to Quartz Lake, at to the river. Sheer cliffs rise on both sides for over several 11,600 feet. The lake itself is relatively small, but pristine.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Utah Fishing Guidebook
    Utah Fishing • Utah Fishing CONTACT US CONTENTS HOW TO USE THIS GUIDEBOOK 2019 1. Review the general rules, starting on page 8. These rules explain the licenses you Turn in a poacher 3 How to use this guidebook need, the fishing methods you may use, and when you can transport and possess fish. Phone: 1-800-662-3337 4 Know the laws 2. Check general season dates, daily limits and possession limits, starting on page 19. Email: [email protected] 5 Keep your license on your Online: wildlife.utah.gov/utip phone or tablet 3. Look up a specific water in the section that starts on page 25. (If the water you’re look- ing for is not listed there, it is subject to the general rules.) Division offices 7 License and permit fees 2019 8 General rules: Licenses and Offices are open 8 a.m.–5 p.m., permits Monday • Utah Fishing through Friday. 8 Free Fishing Day WHAT’S NEW? 8 License exemptions for youth Salt Lake City Free Fishing Day: Free Fishing Day will be quagga mussels on and in boats that have 1594 W North Temple groups and organizations held on June 8, 2019. This annual event is a only been in Lake Powell for a day or two. For Box 146301 9 Discounted licenses for great opportunity to share fishing fun with a details on what’s changed at Lake Powell and Salt Lake City, UT 84114-6301 disabled veterans friend or family member. For more informa- how you can help protect your boat, please see 801-538-4700 10 Help conserve native tion, see page 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Dixie National Forest Visitor Guide
    ixie National Forest VISITOR GUIDE A Contrast in Color, Climate, & Culture Pine Valley Reservoir Red Canyon What’s Inside place of diversity, the Dixie National Forest straddles the divide between the Great Basin and the Colorado History .................................. 2 Scenic Byways, A River in southern Utah. Scenery ranges from desert Backways, & Drives ............. 3 canyon gorges of amber, rose, and sienna to high Special Places ..................... 4 mountain forests, plateaus, and alpine lakes. Our Natural Resources ........ 6 Map ....................................... 8 Campgrounds & Guard Station Rentals ....... 10 Fast Forest Facts he Dixie National Trails .................................... 11 TForest is characterized by Activities .............................. 12 contrast. As a part of the Know Before You Go............ 14 Elevation Range: 3,000’–11,000’ Contact Information ............ 16 world-renowned landscapes Acres: Nearly 2 million of Southern Utah, the forest provides a backdrop and serves as a gateway to The Name: Southwest Utah was called Utah’s Dixie by early settlers from the surrounding National Parks and Monuments. southern states sent to the desert to Nationally recognized highways and trails grow cotton and silk; the forest was course through the forest and provide named after the area. ready access to the distinctive natural Temperature Range: From mountain highlights of the forest landscape. lows of -30 degrees to valley highs of over 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Come see for yourself! Sego Lily This Visitor Guide provides the information you can use to plan your trip to the Dixie National Forest. G et to Know Us History What is now the Dixie National Forest was once orested lands in inhabited by the Paleo-Indian Culture who hunted woolly FSouthern Utah are vital mammoths and megafauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Reservoir Level Updates
    From: Glen Canyon Institute [email protected] Subject: BOR Begins Draining Upstream Reservoirs to Prop up Powell Date: July 20, 2021 at 9:01 AM To: [email protected] Newsletter of Glen Canyon Institute July 20, 2021 Volume 20, No. 7 GCI's Summer Appeal is Underway DONATE TODAY! BOR Begins Draining Upstream Reservoirs to Prop up Lake Powell This week the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) began releasing extra water from Flaming Gorge, Reservoir Navajo, and Blue Mesa reservoirs to prevent Level Updates Powell from dropping near minimum power pool. As of July 14, 2021, Lake Powell and Lake The agency expects this first wave of "emergency Mead are at 33% and 35% of capacity, 35% of capacity, respectively. releases" to prop up Powell by about 3 feet. The Lake Powell Water draining of upstream reservoirs to save Powell is Database part of the Upper Basin's Drought Contingency Lake Mead Water Database Plans, outlined in 2019. The bureau, however, did Upper Colorado Snow not expect to be implementing those plans so pack soon. These drastic actions may prop up Powell for a little while, but as climate scientist Brad Udall recently stated, "There is only about 5 million acre feet for that altogether. It is a one-shot deal." In the next year BOR forecasts a 79% chance that Lake Powell falls to elevation 3525 feet. They also predict that there is a 5% chance that it will fall Our best selling poster of Katie Lee. below the critical power production level of 3,490 Buy it here feet in 2023 and a 17% chance in 2024.
    [Show full text]
  • Navajo State Park Brochure
    Passes and Permits COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE A Colorado State Parks Pass is required on all Navajo State Park motor vehicles entering the park. All passes Developed Area must be properly attached or displayed in the vehicle. An annual Pass is valid at any Colorado State Park for a year from the date of purchase. Navajo The Aspen Leaf annual pass is available to Colorado Seniors at a discounted rate. Daily State Park passes are available at the park entrance stations, self-service dispensers and ENJOY YOUR STATE PARKS ANS Inspection all State Park offices. Station Colorado Disabled Veterans displaying the Colorado Disabled Veteran (DV) license plates are admitted free without a pass, however, a camping fee is charged. All campers are required to purchase a valid camping permit. Emergencies In an emergency, contact a ranger or call the ANS Decon Archuleta Sheriff at 970-731-2160. Station Marina Dry Storage Reservations Call 1-800-244-5613 or view cpw.state.co.us to reserve campsites. Call 303-297-1192, for customer service, 8am-5pm M-F. AVAJO STATE PARK is a park that narrow gauge railway that once was the area’s offers recreation, history, wildlife and transportation lifeline. The Denver and Rio the beauty of southwest Colorado. It Grande railroad served the towns of Rosa and Nis situated just outside of the town of Arboles, the old town of Arboles, both of which now rest Navajo State Park 35 miles southwest of Pagosa Springs, and 45 under the reservoir’s surface. The Cumbres and miles southeast of Durango, Colorado.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanology and Petrogenesis of the Navajo Lake Volcanic Field
    UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-2006 Volcanology and petrogenesis of the Navajo Lake volcanic field Shara L Stowell University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Stowell, Shara L, "Volcanology and petrogenesis of the Navajo Lake volcanic field" (2006). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 1980. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/6mt8-tvhq This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOLCANOLOGY AND PETROGENESIS OF THE NAVAJO LAKE VOLCANIC FIELD by Shara L. Stowell Bachelor o f Science University o f Idaho, Moscow 2001 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillm ent o f the requirements for the Master of Science Degree in Geology Department of Geoscience College of Sciences Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas May 2006 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1436793 Copyright 2006 by Stowell, Shara L. All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]