South - Displacement Crisis Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in South Sudan August 2017

Overview Assessment coverage Conflict in Jonglei State broke out in late December based approach that may cover several bomas, to collect collects data from a network of Key Informants (KIs) who 2013, only days after the current conflict began in data in hard-to-reach areas of State. The pilot was have sector-specific knowledge and gain information from 705 Key Informants interviewed . Since then, the state has been one of the worst expanded to Jonglei State in March 2016, with data regular direct or indirect contact, or recent displacement. affected by the conflict, and currently hosts the second collected in Bor Town, Bor PoC site and Akobo in Jonglei Data collected is aggregated to the settlement level and all 263 Settlements assessed highest reported numbers of internally displaced persons State. Data is also collected from Mingkaman in percentiles presented in this factsheet, unless otherwise Contact with Area of Knowledge (IDPs) in the country. Many areas in Jonglei are largely State and the PoC sites in Juba. specified, represent percent of settlements within Jonglei inaccessible to humanitarian actors due to insecurity and In December 2016, REACH decided to refine the with that specific response. The displacement section on KIs reported being newly arrived logistical constraints. As a result, only limited information 38% methodology, moving from the AoO to the Area of page 2 refers to the proportion of assessed KIs arrived IDPs. is available on the humanitarian situation outside major Knowledge (AoK) methodology, an approach collecting within the previous month (newly arrived IDPs). KIs reported having visited AoK displacementS sites.UDA N information at the settlement level. The most recent 46% Although current AoK coverage is still limited and its within last month. In order to fill such information gaps and facilitate OCHA Common Operational Dataset (COD) released findings not statistically significant, it provides an indicative KIs reported beign in contact with humanitarian planning, in late 2015, REACH piloted its in February 2016 has been used as the reference for understanding of the needs and current humanitarian someone living in AoK within last Area of Origin (AoO) methodology, which takes a territory- settlement names and locations. Through AoK, REACH situation in assessed areas of Jonglei State. 54% month.

Assessment coverage

Assessed settlements Reached settlements Settlement County Assessed settlements OCHA (COD) settlements Cover percentage CANAL Cover percentage of assessed settlements relative to the OCHA (COD) total dataset: 0% Akobo 23 169 14%

1 NYIROL 0.1 - 4.9% 32 245 13% 5 - 10% AYOD Bor South 58 400 15% 10.1 - 20% Canal 0 128 0% 20.1 - 50% > 50% Duk 31 121 26% DUK UROR AKOBO Fangak 26 210 12% Nyirol 24 217 11% TWIC EAST 0 354 0% Pochalla 0 75 0% BOR SOUTH PIBOR Twic East 50 221 23% Uror 19 202 9% Total 263 2,342 11%

1 Data from counties with under 5% settlement coverage are not included in county level analysis, but are included in state-level analysis.

1 August 2017 August 59+23+13+2+1+2 44+34+14+7+1 2% 1% 2% 7% 1% 59% 23% 13% 44% 34% 14% June 2017 July 2017 August 2017

21% 44% 35% South Sudan Displacement Crisis Displacement Sudan South More women than men More men than women About equal All/almost all women All/almost all men No answer More children than adults More adults than children About equal All/almost all adults All/almost all elderly Displacement Demographic composition Reported gender ratio of local community remaining in assessed settlements: Departure from most recent preavious location Departure from most by newly arrived IDPs: 21+44+350+A Reported age ratio of local community remaining Reported age ratio of local community remaining in assessed settlements: POCHALLA PIBOR 44% 22% 17% Insufficient data Insufficient 0 - 25% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% 76 - 100% ●●● ● Percent of settlements reporting local community remaining: AKOBO ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● UROR ● ● NYIROL ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● BOR SOUTH ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● CANAL ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● County Ayod ● ● ● ● TWIC EAST DUK ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● AYOD ● ● ● 2 3 1 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● FANGAK Previous location Previous Most recent previous locations reported by newly Most recent previous arrived IDPs: Local community 2

38% 19% 11% 80+4+11+0+5 60+17+17+4+2 4% 2% 4% 0% 5% 60% 17% 17% 80% 11% Security Access to food Access to health services 2 3 1 I do not know More men than women More children than adults About equal More adults than children All/almost all adults More women than men All/almost all women About equal All/almost all men Demographic composition Pull factors Reported age ratio of IDPs in assessed settlements: Reported gender ratio of IDPs in assessed settlements: Primary reported reason newly arrived IDPs Primary reported reason location: came to their current 13% 30% 27% POCHALLA PIBOR Insufficient data Insufficient 0 - 25% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% 76 - 100% ●●● ● Percent of settlements reporting presence of IDPs: South Sudan - Jonglei State - Jonglei Sudan South Sudan in South Areas of Hard-to-Reach Assessment AKOBO ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● UROR ● ● NYIROL ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Lack of food Insecurity Lack of health services ● BOR SOUTH ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 2 3 1 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● CANAL ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

● ● ● ● ● ● TWIC EAST DUK ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

●

● ● AYOD ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● FANGAK

Push factors their previous location: Primary reported reason newly arrived IDPs left Primary reported reason

Displacement New arrivals

South Sudan - Jonglei State South Sudan Displacement Crisis Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in South Sudan August 2017

Health Shelter/NFI Health concerns

Percent of settlements Most commonly reported heath concerns in Percent of settlements Percent of settlements reporting access to assessed settlements: reporting tukuls as a reporting tukuls as a

healthcare: 45+11+9+7+7 primary shelter type for primary shelter type for local community: IDPs: Insufficient data 1 Malaria 45% Insufficient data Insufficient data 0 - 25% Typhoid 11% 2 0 - 25% 0 - 25% 26 - 50% Wounds 9% 26 - 50% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% 3

● ●● 51 - 75% 51 - 75% ● ●● ● ●● ● ● ● 76 - 100% Malnutrition 7% ● ● 4 ●● ● ●● ●● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 76 - 100% ●● 76 - 100% ● ● ● ●● ● ●● ● ● CANAL ●● FANGAK ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● CANAL ● Stomach pain 7% FANGAK 5 ● ● ● FANGAK CANAL ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● NYIROL● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● NYIROL● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● NYIROL● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● AYOD ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● AYOD ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● AYOD ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ●●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ●●● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ●●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Healthcare distance ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● AKOBO ● ●● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● AKOBO ● ● ● ● AKOBO ●●● ●● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● DUK UROR Reported distance of nearest healthcare facilities ● ● ● DUK UROR ● DUK UROR ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● from assessed settlements: ● ● ●● ● ● ●● ●● ●● ●● ●● ● 7+22+40+24+7 ●● ●● ●● ●● ● ● ●● ●● ●●● ● ● ●● ●● ● ● ● ●●● ● ●● ● ● ●● ●● ●● ●●● ● POCHALLA ● ● ●●● TWIC● EAST●●● ● ●● ● ● ● ●● ● TWIC● EAST●● ● POCHALLA TWIC● EAST●● ● POCHALLA ●● ●●

●● ● ● ●● ●● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ●● ●● ● ● ● Under 30 minutes 7% ●● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 30 minutes to under 1 hour ● ● ● 22% ● ● ● ●● BOR SOUTH ●●● BOR SOUTH ● ● ●●● BOR SOUTH ● ● ● ● PIBOR PIBOR ● ● ● ● ● PIBOR ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 1 hour to under half a day ● 40% ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Half a day 24% ● More than half a day 7%

Healthcare unavailability Feeding programmes Shelter sharing Sheltering IDPs ´Primary reported reason why healthcare Reported availability of feeding programmes that Reported number of people sharing a shelter in Reported proportion of local community sharing facilities are not available from assessed provide Plumpy Sup, CSB++ or other nutrition assessed settlements: shelters with IDPs: 0+16+34+36+12+2 settlements: supplements in assessed settlements: 62+37+1 1 to 5 62% All 0% 28 No healthcare workers 1 28% 79% 6 to 10 37% More than half 16% in area Not available

28 20% Available 11 to 15 1% Around half 34% 28% 2 Area is too insecure 1% I do not know Less than half 36% No medicines 16 79+20+1+A None 12% 3 16% available I do not know 2%

3 August 2017 August 41+48+11+1

1% 100 41% 48% 11% 100% 83% 17% Available Not available South Sudan Displacement Crisis Displacement Sudan South Borehole Under 30 minutes 30 minutes to under 1 hour 1 hour to under half a day More than half a day Water distance Water Reported distance of nearest safe water source Reported distance of from assessed settlements: Water sources Water Reported primary safe water source available Reported primary safe water source available from assessed settlements: Water availability Water Reported availability of a safe water source accessible from assessed settlements: 83+17+A POCHALLA PIBOR

0+0+2+28+690% 0% 2% Insufficient data Insufficient 0 - 25% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% 76 - 100% ●●● 28% 69% ● AKOBO Percent of settlements reporting access to clean drinking water: ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● UROR ● ● NYIROL ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● BOR SOUTH ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● CANAL ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● TWIC EAST DUK ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● AYOD ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● FANGAK All More than half Half Less than half None Sanitation Reported use of sanitation facilities over open Reported use of sanitation facilities over open defecation in assessed settlements: WASH WASH 4 79% 21% Available 9+25+38+18+11 44 18 9 Not available 9% 9% 25% 38% 18% 11% 44% 18% Reported availability of a functioning market accessible from assessed settlements: 79+21+A Market availability Lack of land Unsafe to plant Crops destroyed by natural disaster 87% 13% 2 3 Half a day More than half a day 1 Under 30 minutes 30 minutes to under 1 hour 1 hour to under half a day Available Primary reason settlements reported an inability to Primary reason settlements reported an inability adequately access food: Reported distance of nearest market from Reported distance of assessed settlements: Food unavailability Market distance Not available POCHALLA Reported availability of land for agriculture in assessed settlements: 87+13+A Land availability PIBOR 76 - 100% Insufficient data Insufficient 0 - 25% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% ●●● ● Percent of settlements reporting adequate access to food: South Sudan - Jonglei State - Jonglei Sudan South Sudan in South Areas of Hard-to-Reach Assessment AKOBO ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● UROR ● ● NYIROL ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● BOR SOUTH ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● CANAL ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● coping strategies reported on average ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

● TWIC EAST DUK ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● AYOD ●

●

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

FANGAK

1.4 assessed settlements: coping strategies used in Average number of reported Average Coping strategies Food Security

South Sudan - Jonglei State South Sudan Displacement Crisis Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in South Sudan August 2017

Education Protection Education availability Women Men Children

Percent of settlements Reported available education services in Reported primary protection Reported primary protection Reported primary protection reporting access to assessed settlements: concerns for women in assessed concerns for men in assessed concerns for children in education: 49+0+44+4+0 settlements: settlements: assessed settlements: Insufficient data None 49% Killing/injury by Killing/injury by 0 - 25% Pre-primary 0% 1 51% 1 74% 1 Abduction 58% 26 - 50% other community other community Primary 44%

● ●● 51 - 75% ● ●●

● ● ● ● 2 Sexual violence 7% 2 Cattle raiding 11% 2 Family separation 9% ●● ● 76 - 100% Secondary 4% ● ● ● ●● FANGAK ● CANAL ● ● ● ● ● 2 ● ● ● Killing/injury by ● ALP 0% ● ● Domestic violence 10% 5% Domestic violence 6% ● 3 3 3 ● ● ● ● NYIROL● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● same community ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● AYOD ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ●●● ● ● ● ● ●● ● ● ● Family separation 4% Forced recruitment 4% Early marriage 4% ● ● 4 4 4 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● AKOBO Education attendance and availability ● ●● ● ●● ● ●● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● DUK UROR ● ● ● Killing/injury by ● ● ● ●

● ● Abduction 3% Looting 2% 3% ● Primary reported reason why children are not 5 5 5 ● ●● other community ● ● ● ●●● ●●● ● ●● ●●● ●●●● ●● TWIC● EAST●● ● POCHALLA ●● attending school in assessed settlements:

●● ● ● ●● ● ●● 54 ●

● ● ●

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●● ● High fees 54% Community relations Land disputes ● 1 ● ● ● ●●● BOR SOUTH ● ● PIBOR ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● 3 ● ● ● ● 19 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● Reported relationships between IDPs, returnees Reported presence of disputes over land ● ● ●● ● ● ●● ● ● ● 2 Insecurity 19% and local community in assessed settlements: ownership in assessed settlements: 19+69+12+0 Primary reported reason why education services Very Good 19% are not available in assessed settlements: Good 69%

37 91% No Neutral 12% 1 Insecurity 37% 9% Yes

27 Poor 0% 2 No available facilities 27% School attendance 91+9+A 3 Local community displaced and returned home, reported in 17% of Reported proportion of settlements where 6-17 years old boys and girls attend school respectively: assessed settlements. 0+70+25+5 0% 0% None About REACH 4% Less than half 70% REACH facilitates development of information tools and products that enhance capacity of aid actors to make ev- 30% Half 25% idence-based decisions in emergency, recovery and development contexts. All REACH activities are conducted 65% More than half 5% through inter-agency aid coordination mechanisms. For more information, you can write to our in-country office: 2% 0% [email protected] or to our global office: [email protected]. 2+65+30+4+0 All 2 Accelerated learning programmes. Visit www.reach-initiative.org and follow us @REACH_info.

5