DOCSLIB.ORG

The Adaptation of Babylonian Methods in Greek Numerical Astronomy Alexander Jones Isis, Vol. 82, No. 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Adaptation of Babylonian Methods in Greek Numerical Astronomy Alexander Jones Isis, Vol. 82, No. 3 The Adaptation of Babylonian Methods in Greek Numerical Astronomy Alexander Jones Isis, Vol. 82, No. 3. (Sep., 1991), pp. 440-453. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-1753%28199109%2982%3A3%3C440%3ATAOBMI%3E2.0.CO%3B2-P Isis is currently published by The University of Chicago Press. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Thu Aug 16 14:35:22 2007 The Adaptation of Babylonian Methods in Greek Numerical Astronomy By Alexander Jones* HE DISTINCTION CUSTOMARILY MADE between the two chief astro- T nomical traditions of antiquity is that Greek astronomy was geometrical, whereas Babylonian astronomy was arithmetical. That is to say, the Babylonian astronomers of the last five centuries B.C. devised elaborate combinations of arithmetical sequences to predict the apparent motions of the heavenly bodies, while the Greeks persistently tried to explain the same phenomena by hypothe- sizing kinematic models compounded out of circular motions. This description is substantially correct so far as it goes, but it conceals a great difference on the Greek side between the methods of, say, Eudoxus in the fourth century B.C.and those of Ptolemy in the second century of our era. Both tried to account for the observed behavior of the stars, sun, moon, and planets by means of combinations of circular motions. But Eudoxus seems to have studied the properties of his models purely through the resources of geometry. The only numerical parameters associated with his concentric spheres in our ancient sources are crude periods of synodic and longitudinal revolution, that is to say, data imposed on the models rather than deduced from them.' By contrast, Ptolemy's approach in the Almn- gest is thoroughly numeri~al.~In its theoretical aspect, Ptolemy's astronomy set out to describe the apparent motions of the sun, moon, and planets according to models composed of parts, the dimensions and speeds of which were all calcu- lated from quantitative observations. Its practical aspect expressed the behavior of the models in the form of numerical tables by which the apparent positions and other observable phenomena of the heavenly bodies could be predicted for a specified time. * Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, Victoria College 316, Uni- versity of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1K7, Canada. The research for this article was carried out under a Canada Research Fellowship (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada). ' Simplicius, Commentary on Aristotle's De Caelo, in Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. VII: Simplicii in Aristotelis De caelo Commentaria, ed. J. L. Heiberg (Berlin, 1894), pp. 493-507. I choose Eudoxus for this comparison because we are relatively well informed by Simplicius about the arrangement of his models, the astronomical phenomena they were intended to explain, and the grounds on which they were first criticized. The same conditions, as I intend to argue elsewhere, probably still applied to the astronomy of Apollonius (ca. 200 B.c.). G. J. Toomer, Ptolemy's "Alrnagest" (London: Duckworth; New York: Springer, 1984). ISIS, 1991, 82 : 441-453 44 1 Figure 1. A Babylonian tablet (B.M. 37236) listing undated phases of Mars according to the System A scheme. By permission of the Trustees of the British Museum. 442 ALEXANDER JONES The earliest Greek astronomer known to have extensively applied numerical methods to geometrical models is Hipparchus (active ca. 150-125 B.c.).~In the Almagest Ptolemy passes on much information about how Hipparchus deter- mined the parameters of his solar and lunar models, both when he agrees with Hipparchus's results (as in the measurement of the solar eccentricity and apsidal line) and when he finds fault with them (as in finding the dimensions and periods of the lunar m~del).~Not only do these passages prove the numerical character of Hipparchus's work; but the fact that Ptolemy nowhere discusses comparable measurements by anyone other than Hipparchus is a weighty argument that Hip- parchus was the founder of this methodology. This conclusion also finds support in the lack of evidence that any Greek before Hipparchus's time possessed three of the foundations of Greek numerical astronomy: sexagesimal arithmetic, degree measure, and a table of chords for trigonometric computation^.^ The Mesopotamian origin of the first two of these three resources points to another respect in which Hipparchus differed from his predecessors: his exten- sive use of elements of Babylonian astronomy. This is not to deny that Babylo- nian astronomical concepts and conventions, for example the ecliptic and its division into twelve equal zodiacal signs, had entered Greek astronomy from the time of Eudoxus on. But Hipparchus had access to Babylonian data, both obser- vational and theoretical, on a much larger scale and of a much more technical nature than anything that we find in earlier Greek sources. In 1900 F. X. Kugler showed from the recently deciphered astronomical cuneiform texts that the fun- damental period relations of Hipparchus's lunar theory, namely his value for the mean synodic month and its ratio to the anomalistic and dracontic months, were parameters taken from the heart of the complex Babylonian System B lunar theory.6 Significant as it was, this discovery was only the beginning: Babylonian elements have since been recognized in numerous aspects of Hipparchus's astro- nomical work.7 At the same time, the study of astrological texts, Greco-Egyptian papyri of the Roman period, and Indian treatises descended from Greek originals has revealed extensive traces of Babylonian predictive schemes, to the degree that it is now evident that many of the most advanced methods of Babylonian A good general survey of Hipparchus's work is G. J. Toomer, "Hipparchus," in Dictionary of Scientific Biography, ed. C. C. Gillispie, 16 vols. (New York: Scribners, 1970-1980) (hereafter DSB) Vol. XV, pp. 207-224. For details of the topics discussed here see also section 4 of A. Jones, "Models and Tables of Ancient Astronomy, 200 B.C. to A.D. 300," Part 37.4 of Aufstieg und Niedergang der Romischen Welt, ser. 11, Principat (BerlinINew York: de Gruyter, in press). Ptolemy, Almagest 3.4 (solar model), 4.2, 7, and 9 (lunar periods), and 4.1 1 (lunar eccentricity). Degrees and sexagesimal arithmetic first appear in Greek in the Anaphorikos of Hypsicles, who wrote a generation or so later than Apollonius, i.e., roughly contemporary with Hipparchus if not a decade or two earlier. See V. De Falco, M. Krause, and 0. Neugebauer, Hypsikles: Die Auf- gangszeiten der Gestirne (Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Gottingen, Philo1.-hist. Kl., 3rd Ser., 62) (Gottingen, 1966); and for the date, G. L. Huxley, "Studies in Greek Astronomers," Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 1963, 4:83-105. The chord table was probably Hipparchus's invention, as argued by G. J. Toomer, "The Chord Table of Hipparchus and the Early History of Greek Trigonometry," Centaurus, 1973, 18:6-28. F. X. Kugler, Die babylonische Mondrechnung (Freiburg, 1900), pp. 20-40. 'Most of the evidence is collected and discussed in G. J. Toomer, "Hipparchus and Babylonian Astronomy," in A ScientiJic Humanist: Studies in Memory of Abraham Sachs, ed. E. Leichty, M. deJ. Ellis, and P. Gerardi (Occasional Publications of the Samuel Noah Kramer Fund, 9) (Philadel- phia, 1988), pp. 353-362. ADAPTATION OF BABYLONIAN METHODS 443 planetary and lunar theory were substantially transmitted into Greek and prac- ticed widely in the Hellenistic world.8 How the Greeks came by this knowledge remains controversial, and indeed no single channel of transmission seems adequate to explain the whole range of Babylonian astronomical lore attested in Greek sources. Hipparchus (and through him, Ptolemy) had access to reports of lunar eclipses from Babylon rang- ing from 747 B.C.to the early fourth century B.c., if not later, as well as Babylo- nian planetary observations from the second half of the third century B.C. The source of these reports was almost certainly the astronomical archive of Babylon. Significant numbers of observational texts from this archive are extant and are in the course of publi~ation.~We can now see that the reports in Ptolemy's Alma- gest represent only a selection from a mass of information so enormous that a translation into Greek of the whole, or even of a large fraction of it, is inconceiv- able. The only plausible alternative seems to be that some Greek, having consid- erable technical competence and a specific idea of what sort of observations he wanted, extracted reports from the archive with the collaboration of the astron- omers of Babylon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • COPYRIGHT NOTICE: for COURSE PACK and Other PERMISSIONS
    COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Jean-Louis and Monique Tassoul: A Concise History of Solar and Stellar Physics is published by Princeton University Press and copyrighted, © 2004, by Princeton University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher, except for reading and browsing via the World Wide Web. Users are not permitted to mount this file on any network servers. For COURSE PACK and other PERMISSIONS, refer to entry on previous page. For more information, send e-mail to [email protected] Chapter One The Age of Myths and Speculations And God said, Let there be light, and there was light. —Genesis 1:3 For thousands of years men have looked up into the star-filled night sky and have wondered about the nature of the “fixed” stars as opposed to that of the five planets wandering among the constellations of the zodiac. The daily course of the sun, its brilliance and heat, and the passing of the seasons are among the central problems that have concerned every human society. Undoubtedly, the appearance of a comet or a shooting star, the passing phenomena of clouds and rain and lightning, the Milky Way, the changing phases of the moon and the eclipses—all of these must have caused quite a sense of wonder and been the source of endless discussions. Faced with this confusing multiplicity of brute facts, beyond their physical power to control, our ancestors sought to master these unrelated phenomena symbolically by picturing the universe in terms of objects familiar to them so as to make clear the unfamiliar and the unexplained.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Inventors of the Ancient World Preliminary Syllabus & Course Outline
    CLA 46 Dr. Patrick Hunt Spring Quarter 2014 Stanford Continuing Studies http://www.patrickhunt.net Great Inventors Of the Ancient World Preliminary Syllabus & Course Outline A Note from the Instructor: Homo faber is a Latin description of humans as makers. Human technology has been a long process of adapting to circumstances with ingenuity, and while there has been gradual progress, sometimes technology takes a downturn when literacy and numeracy are lost over time or when humans forget how to maintain or make things work due to cataclysmic change. Reconstructing ancient technology is at times a reminder that progress is not always guaranteed, as when Classical civilization crumbled in the West, but the history of technology is a fascinating one. Global revolutions in technology occur in cycles, often when necessity pushes great minds to innovate or adapt existing tools, as happened when humans first started using stone tools and gradually improved them, often incrementally, over tens of thousands of years. In this third course examining the greats of the ancient world, we take a close look at inventions and their inventors (some of whom might be more legendary than actually known), such as vizier Imhotep of early dynastic Egypt, who is said to have built the first pyramid, and King Gudea of Lagash, who is credited with developing the Mesopotamian irrigation canals. Other somewhat better-known figures are Glaucus of Chios, a metallurgist sculptor who possibly invented welding; pioneering astronomer Aristarchus of Samos; engineering genius Archimedes of Siracusa; Hipparchus of Rhodes, who made celestial globes depicting the stars; Ctesibius of Alexandria, who invented hydraulic water organs; and Hero of Alexandria, who made steam engines.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Famous Greek Mathematicians and Their Contributions 1. Euclid
    15 Famous Greek Mathematicians and Their Contributions 1. Euclid He was also known as Euclid of Alexandria and referred as the father of geometry deduced the Euclidean geometry. The name has it all, which in Greek means “renowned, glorious”. He worked his entire life in the field of mathematics and made revolutionary contributions to geometry. 2. Pythagoras The famous ‘Pythagoras theorem’, yes the same one we have struggled through in our childhood during our challenging math classes. This genius achieved in his contributions in mathematics and become the father of the theorem of Pythagoras. Born is Samos, Greece and fled off to Egypt and maybe India. This great mathematician is most prominently known for, what else but, for his Pythagoras theorem. 3. Archimedes Archimedes is yet another great talent from the land of the Greek. He thrived for gaining knowledge in mathematical education and made various contributions. He is best known for antiquity and the invention of compound pulleys and screw pump. 4. Thales of Miletus He was the first individual to whom a mathematical discovery was attributed. He’s best known for his work in calculating the heights of pyramids and the distance of the ships from the shore using geometry. 5. Aristotle Aristotle had a diverse knowledge over various areas including mathematics, geology, physics, metaphysics, biology, medicine and psychology. He was a pupil of Plato therefore it’s not a surprise that he had a vast knowledge and made contributions towards Platonism. Tutored Alexander the Great and established a library which aided in the production of hundreds of books.
    [Show full text]
  • Theon of Alexandria and Hypatia
    CREATIVE MATH. 12 (2003), 111 - 115 Theon of Alexandria and Hypatia Michael Lambrou Abstract. In this paper we present the story of the most famous ancient female math- ematician, Hypatia, and her father Theon of Alexandria. The mathematician and philosopher Hypatia flourished in Alexandria from the second part of the 4th century until her violent death incurred by a mob in 415. She was the daughter of Theon of Alexandria, a math- ematician and astronomer, who flourished in Alexandria during the second part of the fourth century. Information on Theon’s life is only brief, coming mainly from a note in the Suda (Suida’s Lexicon, written about 1000 AD) stating that he lived in Alexandria in the times of Theodosius I (who reigned AD 379-395) and taught at the Museum. He is, in fact, the Museum’s last attested member. Descriptions of two eclipses he observed in Alexandria included in his commentary to Ptolemy’s Mathematical Syntaxis (Almagest) and elsewhere have been dated as the eclipses that occurred in AD 364, which is consistent with Suda. Although originality in Theon’s works cannot be claimed, he was certainly immensely influential in the preservation, dissemination and editing of clas- sic texts of previous generations. Indeed, with the exception of Vaticanus Graecus 190 all surviving Greek manuscripts of Euclid’s Elements stem from Theon’s edition. A comparison to Vaticanus Graecus 190 reveals that Theon did not actually change the mathematical content of the Elements except in minor points, but rather re-wrote it in Koini and in a form more suitable for the students he taught (some manuscripts refer to Theon’s sinousiai).
    [Show full text]
  • Hypatia of Alexandria
    Hypathia of Alexandria Doina Ionescu Astronomical Institute of the Romanian Academy, E–mail: [email protected] Introduction - Born in 350-355/370; - Lived and learned in Alexandria, Roman Egypt; - The daughter of Theon, the last director of the Museum of Alexandria; - Trained by her father in physical education, mathematics, astronomy, philosophy, arts, literature, the principles of teaching, oratory; - Died in 415, killed by a Christian mob who blamed her for religious turmoil. The Musaeum of Alexandria - Founded in the 3rd century BCE by Ptolemy I Soter or his son Ptolemy II; - Comprised gardens, a room for shared dining, a reading room, lecture halls, meetings rooms and a library; - The Library of Alexandria: an acquisitions department and a cataloguing department; - The Mouseion (“The House of the Muses”) – an institution that brought together the best scholars of the Hellenistic world, a university; - Destruction of the Mouseion and Library of Alexandria: 1. Julius Caesar’s Fire in the Alexandrian War, 48 BC; 2. The attack of Aurelian in the 3rd century AD; 3. The decree of Theophilus in AD 391; 4. The Muslim conquest in AD 642 and thereafter. Theon (b: 335 – d. early 5th century) - Most of the references on him and on Hypathia : Suda, the 10th century Byzantine encyclopedia; - Highly educated scholar, mathematician and astronomer; - A member and possibly the last director of the Alexandrian Museion, on public payroll. - Devoted his scholarship to the study of his predecessors Euclid and Ptolemy; his recensions were designed for students; - Euclid’s Elements; - Thirteen books of Ptolemy’ Almagest ; Handy Tables : The Great Commentary, in five books, and The Little Commentary , in one; - He worked together with scholar and student associates and with his daughter, Hypathia - A treatise “On the Small Astrolabe” ; - On Signs and the examination of Birds and the Croaking of Ravens: two essays on the function of the star Syrius and the influence of the planetary spheres on the Nile; - 364 AD: predicted eclipses of the Sun and Moon in Alexandria.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vector Approach to Ptolemy's Theorem a Vector Approach To
    386 MATHEMATICSMAGAZINE In the revolutionof a graphy = f(xl) aboutthe y-axis, we let F(l X2, X3) = f (x + X2 + X) . Using sphericalcoordinates the integralbecomes I jlv/1 + (f/(p))2 p2 sin 0 dpdqds= 47rp2 + ( (p))2p dO O a a Formula(4) follows. For revolution aboutthe x-axis, the surface y2 + y2 + y2 = f2(X) can be parame- terizedusing sphericalcoordinates as x = t, Y = f(t) sin cos , Y2 = f(t) sin sin0, 3 = f(t) cos for a < t < b, 0 < 0 < r, 0 < 0 < 2r. Formula(4) follows aftera straightforward calculationof the determinantin (5). Epilogue Now thatwe have extendedthe resultsto fourdimensions, we mightcon- sider extendingthem furtherto n dimensions.In fact, in higherdimensions there are otherways to revolvegraphs about axes. For example,in four dimensionswe could considerthe doublerotation, where the graphis firstrevolved about the y-axis in three dimensionsand thenthe resultingsurface is revolvedabout the x-axis in four dimen- sions. REFERENCES 1. E. A. Abbott,Flatland, Harperand Row Publishers,NY, 1983. 2. D. Davis, TheNature and Power of Mathematics,Princeton University Press, Princeton,NJ, 1993. 3. J. H. Hubbardand B. B. Hubbard,Vector Calculus, Linear Algebra, and Differential Forms, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River,NJ, 1999. 4. G. J. Porter,k-volume in ln and the GeneralizedPythagorean Theorem, Amer. Math. Monthly 103 (1996), 252-256. A VectorApproach to Ptolemy'sTheorem ERWIN JUST NORMAN SCHAUMBERGER Bronx Community College of the City University of New York Bronx, NY 10453 [email protected] Ptolemy'sTheorem [1] statesthat the productof the diagonalsof a cyclic quadrilateral (a quadrilateralthat can be inscribedin a circle) is equalto the sum of the productsof its oppositesides.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Applications of the Generalized Ptolemy Theorem
    Two Applications of the Generalized Ptolemy Theorem Shay Gueron 1. INTRODUCTION. The classical theorem of Ptolemy (used for computations by Claudius Ptolemaeus of Alexandria, 2nd century AD, but probably known even be- fore him [7, pp. 123-1241) states that if A, B, C, D are, in this order, four points on the circle 0, then IABI x lCDI + lADl x lBCl = lACl x IBDl. This result in- cludes Pythagoras' Theorem when applied to a rectangle, and yields other important trigonometric identities when applied to special cyclic quadrilaterals A BCD. For ex- ample, if the diagonal AC is a diameter, lACl = 1, iDAC = a, and iBAC = P, then Ptolemy's Theorem gives sin(a + P) = sin a cos /3 + sin /3 cos a. In a more gen- eral context, Ptolemy's Theorem is the inequality lABl x lCDl + lADl x I BCI > lACl x I BDI, where equality occurs if and only if A, B, C, D lie (in this order) on a circle or on a line. This formulation of the theorem can be viewed as the "image under inversion7' of the triangle inequality [ll, p. 891. Ptolemy's Theorem can be generalized to the situation where the points A, B, C, D are replaced by four circles that touch 0. Our goal is to show how the Generalized Ptolemy Theorem can be used to prove two results in plane geometry. The first result, Theorem 1, is a generalization of a theorem that was originally pro- posed in 1938, as a MONTHLYproblem, by the French geometer Victor ThCbault [15].
    [Show full text]
  • Adobe Acrobat
    A ANCIENT GREECE Background Information 9: Astronomy General Introduction: • Astronomy is considered to be the first science • The term astronomy comes from 2 Greek words; astron – ‘star,’ and nemein – ‘to name.’ • Humans observed the stars for thousands of years before the Greeks – but many of the names of stars come directly from the Ancient Greeks because they were the first astronomers to make a systematic catalogue of the stars. Heritage: • The Babylonians believed that the sun, moon, planets and stars were placed there by the gods. They observed that the stars travelled in a certain band of sky – which they divided into 12, recognizable patterns or constellations – now known as the zodiac. They named the constellations after animals / characters they recognized. • The Egyptians used astronomy for timekeeping only. They developed a calendar based on the solar year. • The Greeks combined this knowledge adding a Greek twist to some elements (see signs of the zodiac) and extending it. Historically Significant Individuals / Developments • 6th C BC Greeks realise the earth is a sphere. Made first accurate measurements of earth’s circumference and moon’s size and distance from earth. • 6th C Thales: the earth rests on water • 6th C Anaximander: the earth doesn’t rest on anything • 540-480 BC Heraclitus: universe behaves in a periodic fashion. The sun is a foot wide and is new every day. – 1 – www.ancientgreece.co.uk | © The British Museum 2005 • 500-428 BC Anaxagoras: the mind controls the universe, comets are formed by planets colliding, eclipses are explained by shadows, and the earth is flat and solid, supported in the air.
    [Show full text]
  • Democritus (460-370 BC) on Embryology, Anatomy and Pediatrics: the Unknown Aspects of the Greek Atomic Scientist
    IJAE Vol. 117, n. 3: 199-204, 2012 ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANATOMY AND EMBRYOLOGY Research Article: History Of Anatomy and Embryology Democritus (460-370 BC) on Embryology, Anatomy and Pediatrics: the unknown aspects of the Greek atomic scientist Gregory Tsoucalas, Marianna Karamanou*, Antonis A. Kousoulis, George Androutsos History of Medicine Department, Medical School, University of Athens, Greece Submitted January 29, 2012; accepted June 17, 2012 Abstract Democritus was born in Abdera, Thrace, in the 5th century BC. He travelled to the East while being the student of famous philosophers. His philosophical ideas and the establishment of particles, “the atoms”, gave him a leading position in world history. However, his medical knowledge was vast especially in the field of pediatric pharmacology. Numerous are also the reports of his passion for anatomy. Democritus’ views regarding the issue of Human Nature and Anatomy are depicted in a letter he sent to Hippocrates of Kos. He died in old age, possi- bly of infection after having totally neglected his personal hygiene. Keywords Democritus; philosophy; atom; embryology; pediatrics; anatomy. Note: for ancient authors, citations in the text do not include the year of publication of the original writings; the reference list reports the year of publication of the critical edition which was used for this study. Introductory note and brief biography Democritus of Igisistratos or Athinocratos or Damasippos (Precope, 1961; Marcov- ich, 1999) was born in Abdera, Thrace, Greece, around the 80th Olympic Games, 460- 457 BC (Herodotus; Strabo) or earlier (Anaksagoras Klazomenios). He visited Egypt where, in the sanctuary of Memphis, he was initiated to Jewish spirituality by a sage woman named Maria.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazing Astronomers of Antiquity
    AMAZING ASTRONOMERS OF ANTIQUITY VERSION (SUBTITLES) REVISED: JULY 26, 2003 SCENE TIME SCRIPT TITLES OPENING TITLES 00:05 AMAZING ASTRONOMERS OF ANTIQUITY SCENE 1 ROME, ITALY 00:11 Welcome to Rome, the Eternal City and a living muSeum of civilizations past and present. The Pantheon, a temple dating back to Imperial Rome iS perhapS the moSt elegant and copied building in the world and a Structure with an aStronomical connection. The Pantheon'S dome iS larger than St PeterS' and in itS center iS an open oculuS Showing day and night. ThiS temple, both open and encloSed, iS an aStronomical inStrument a type of Solar quadrant. As the Sun moveS weStward acroSS the Sky, the Sun's light moveS acrosS the dome wallS like sunlight Streaming through a porthole. The moving image tellS both the time of day and the SeaSon of the year. The Pantheon was dedicated to the Seven planetary divinities Jupiter, Saturn, Mercury, VenuS, MarS, the Sun and Moon the Seven moSt important celeStial objectS in the ancient Sky. The Pantheon'S deSign required the collective wiSdom of many ancient astronomerS. We have Sent reporterS throughout the Mediterranean BaSin to identify and honor Seven of theSe amazing astronomerS. SCENE 2 SAQQARA, EGYPT 01:35 Welcome to Saqqara, home of the world'S oldeSt major Stone structure and Egypt's first great pyramid. Imhotep constructed this step pyramid 5,000 years ago for King Djoser. Imhotep was an architect, high prieSt, phySician, Scribe and aStronomer - one of the few men of non-royal birth who became an Egyptian god.
    [Show full text]
  • The Adaptation of Babylonian Methods in Greek Numerical Astronomy
    FIgure 1. A Babylonian tablet (B.M. 37236) listing undated phases of Mars according to the System A scheme. By permission of the Trustees of the British Museum. This content downloaded from 128.122.149.96 on Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:50:19 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms The Adaptation of Babylonian Methods in Greek Numerical Astronomy By Alexander Jones* THE DISTINCTION CUSTOMARILY MADE between the two chief astro- nomical traditions of antiquity is that Greek astronomy was geometrical, whereas Babylonian astronomy was arithmetical. That is to say, the Babylonian astronomers of the last five centuries B.C. devised elaborate combinations of arithmetical sequences to predict the apparent motions of the heavenly bodies, while the Greeks persistently tried to explain the same phenomena by hypothe- sizing kinematic models compounded out of circular motions. This description is substantially correct so far as it goes, but it conceals a great difference on the Greek side between the methods of, say, Eudoxus in the fourth century B.C. and those of Ptolemy in the second century of our era. Both tried to account for the observed behavior of the stars, sun, moon, and planets by means of combinations of circular motions. But Eudoxus seems to have studied the properties of his models purely through the resources of geometry. The only numerical parameters associated with his concentric spheres in our ancient sources are crude periods of synodic and longitudinal revolution, that is to say, data imposed on the models rather than deduced from them.1 By contrast, Ptolemy's approach in the Alma- 2 gest is thoroughly numerical.
    [Show full text]
  • Pythagoras Theorem Is an Alternate Form of Ptolemy's Theorem
    1 Pythagoras theorem is an alternate form of Ptolemy’s theorem Radhakrishnamurty Padyal A-102, Cedar, Brigade Orchards, Devanahalli, Bengaluru – 562110, India. Email: padyala1941@yahoo. Com Abstract Generally, the proofs given to demonstrate Ptolemy’s theorem prove Pythagoras theorem as a special case of Ptolemy’s theorem when certain special conditions are imposed. We prove in this article, that Pythagoras theorem follows from Ptolemy’s theorem in all cases. Therefore, we may say that Pythagoras rediscovered Ptolemy’s theorem. Key words Ptolemy’s theorem, geometry, Pythagoras theorem, cyclic quadrilateral, mean proportional Ptolemy’s theorem is a well-known theorem in geometry. Many different methods of proof are available in literature1-4. In a recent article1 we gave a geometrical proof of Ptolemy’s theorem. Therein we showed that the products of pairs of opposite sides of a cyclic quadrilateral can be geometrically represented by rectangles. Similarly the product of the diagonals of the same quadrilateral can be represented by another rectangle. Then we showed that the sum of the areas of the rectangles obtained from the products of sides is equal to the area of the rectangle obtained from the product of the diagonals. In this article we show the areas products of pairs of opposite sides as well as the product of the diagonals of a cyclic quadrilateral can be geometrically represented by circles. Then we show that the sum of the areas of the circles obtained from the products of sides is equal to the area of the circle obtained from the product of the diagonals. To obtain the radii of these circles we take the mean proportional of the pairs of opposite sides of the cyclic quadrilateral and the mean proportional of the pair of its diagonals.
    [Show full text]