The L2 Geometry of the Symplectomorphism Group

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The L2 Geometry of the Symplectomorphism Group THE L2 GEOMETRY OF THE SYMPLECTOMORPHISM GROUP A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by James Benn, Gerard Misio lek,Director Graduate Program in Mathematics Notre Dame, Indiana April 2015 c Copyright by James Benn 2015 All Rights Reserved THE L2 GEOMETRY OF THE SYMPLECTOMORPHISM GROUP Abstract by James Benn In this thesis we study the geometry of the group of Symplectic diffeomor- phisms of a closed Symplectic manifold M, equipped with the L2 weak Riemannian metric. It is known that the group of Symplectic diffeomorphisms is geodesically complete with respect to this L2 metric and admits an exponential mapping which is defined on the whole tangent space. Our primary objective is to describe the structure of the set of singularities of associated weak Riemannian exponential mapping, which are known as conjugate points. We construct examples of con- jugate points on the Symplectomorphism group and solve the Jacobi equation explicitly along geodesics consisting of isometries of M. Using the functional cal- culus and spectral theory, we show that every such geodesic contains conjugate points, all of which have even multiplicity. A macroscopic view of conjugate points is then given by showing that the exponential mapping of the L2 metric is a non- linear Fredholm map of index zero, from which we deduce that conjugate points constitute a set of first Baire category in the Symplectic diffeomorphism group. Finally, using the Fredholm properties of the exponential mapping, we give a new characterization of conjugate points along stationary geodesics in terms of the linearized geodesic equation and coadjoint orbits. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . iv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW . .1 CHAPTER 2: PRELIMINARIES . .8 2.1 Diffeomorphism Groups . .8 2.1.1 Manifolds of Mappings . .8 2.1.2 Groups of Diffeomorphisms . 11 2.1.3 Exponential Mappings . 12 2.2 Weak Riemannian Structure on the Diffeomorphism Group . 14 s 2.3 The Symplectic Diffeomorphism Group D! ............ 19 s 2.3.1 The Manifold Structure of D! ................ 19 2.3.2 Hodge Theory for Manifolds . 24 s 2.3.3 Weak Riemannian Structure for D!(M).......... 33 2.4 L2 Geodesic Completeness . 36 2.5 Curvature . 42 CHAPTER 3: CONJUGATE POINTS IN THE SYMPLECTOMORPHISM GROUP . 49 3.1 Introduction . 49 3.2 Adjoint and Coadjoint Operators . 51 3.3 The Second Fundamental Tensor and Curvature . 62 s n 3.4 Conjugate Points on D!(CP ).................... 71 3.5 Geodesics in the Isometry Subgroup . 77 3.6 The Jacobi Equation along Geodesics of Isometries . 82 CHAPTER 4: FREDHOLM PROPERTIES OF THE L2 EXPONENTIAL s MAP ON D! ................................ 92 4.1 Introduction . 92 4.2 The Jacobi Equation . 94 4.3 Proof of Fredholmness in Hσ ..................... 98 4.4 Proof of Fredholmness in Hs ..................... 108 ii s n CHAPTER 5: CONJUGATE POINTS ON DHam(M ) IN DIMENSIONS n =2AND4 ................................ 114 5.1 Introduction . 114 5.2 A Conservation Law . 118 5.3 A Characterization of Conjugate Points along Stationary Geodesics 120 5.4 Proof of Proposition 5.3.1 . 122 APPENDIX A: SOBOLEV SPACES . 130 A.1 Sobolev Spaces of Bounded Domains in Rn ............. 130 A.2 Sobolev Spaces on Compact Manifolds . 131 A.3 Sobolev Spaces on Vector Bundles . 132 APPENDIX B: SYMPLECTIC VECTOR SPCAES AND MANIFOLDS . 135 B.1 Symplectic Manifolds . 135 B.2 Symplectomorphisms . 137 APPENDIX C: FREDHOLM OPERATORS . 140 C.1 Compact Operators . 140 C.2 Fredholm Operators . 142 APPENDIX D: SPECTRAL INTEGRALS . 146 D.1 Spectral Measures . 146 D.2 Stone's Theorem . 148 BIBLIOGRAPHY . 151 iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A very special thanks goes out to my friend and advisor, Gerard Misio lek,for introducing me to the subject and for his endless ideas. Thankyou to Alex Hi- monas for his ongoing support and to Steve Preston for his interest and useful suggestions. My family, my friends; I thank all of you deeply. iv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Let M be a closed Symplectic manifold with Symplectic form ! and Rie- mannian metric g. We assume that ! and g are compatible, in the sense that there exists an almost complex structure J : TM ! TM satisfying J 2 = −I, g(Jv; Jw) = g(v; w), and g(v; Jw) = !(v; w), for any vector fields v; w on M (see s appendix A). Let D! (M) denote the group of all diffeomorphisms of Sobolev class s dim M s H preserving the Symplectic form ! on M. If s > 2 + 1 then D! becomes an infinite dimensional Hilbert manifold whose tangent spaces at a point η consists of Hs sections X of the pull-back bundle η∗TM for which the corresponding vector −1 field v = X ◦ η on M satisfies Lv! = 0, where L is the usual Lie derivative. Using right-translations, the L2 inner product on vector fields, Z s (u; v)L2 = g (u; v) dµ, u; v 2 TeD!; (1.1) M defines a right-invariant metric on the group. This thesis is concerned with the 2 s s L geometry of the group D!, and it's finite codimensional subgroup DHam - the group of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms. Diffeomorphism groups can be realized as the configuration spaces of a number of equations in mathematical physics, which provides a strong motivation to study their geometry. Perhaps the most famous example is the Euler equations of hy- 1 drodynamics, where Arnold, [A], noticed that a curve η(t) in the group of smooth s 2 volume preserving diffeomorphisms (Dµ) is a geodesic of the L metric (1.1) if and only if the vector field v, defined by @tη = v ◦ η, solves the Euler equations of hydrodynamics. The L2 metric is simply the kinetic energy of the fluid, and the geodesic equation is a manifestation of Newton's second law F = ma. s 2 Analogously, a curve η(t) in D!(M) is a geodesic of the L metric starting from the identity in the direction vo if and only if the time dependent vector field v =η _ ◦ η−1 on M solves the Symplectic Euler equations ! @tv + Pe (rvv) = 0 (1.2) Lv! = 0 v(0) = vo; ! where Pe is the orthogonal projection onto the space of Symplectic vector fields. The subgroup of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms plays a role in plasma dynamics analogous to the role played by the volume preserving diffeomorphism group in incompressible hydrodynamics, see Arnold and Khesin [A-Kh], Holm and Tronci [H-T], Morrison [Mo], Marsden and Weinstein, [M-W], for details. Chapter 2 contains a review of the manifold structure of mapping spaces and diffeomorphism groups. We briefly describe the shortcomings of the group expo- nential map on diffeomorphism groups and motivate the endowment of a weak Riemannian structure (the L2 metric (1.1)) on these manifolds. Section 2.3 fo- cuses our attention on the Symplectomorphism and Hamiltonian subgroups (and submanifolds!) of the diffeomorphism group. Here we recall the Hodge decompo- sition of forms and the fundamental results of Ebin and Marsden, [E-M], which 2 prove the existence of a smooth right-invariant connection and exponential map- ping associated to the weak L2 metric. We define the weak Riemannian curvature tensors on the Symplectomorphism group and indicate that they are trilinear op- erators bounded in the strong Sobolev Hs topology, as shown in Misiolek [M1]. Finally, in section 2.4 we review Ebin's [Eb] and Khesin's [Kh] proof that solutions to the Symplectic Euler equations (1.2) exist globally in time for any Symplectic s 2 manifold, so that the group D!(M) is L geodesically complete. Arnold ([A]) computed sectional curvatures of diffeomorphism groups and found that they were mostly negative, although in some small regions they were s positive. He asked if there are conjugate points on Dµ and called for a description s of them. Much progress in understanding conjugate points on Dµ has been made since the work of Misiolek. In [M1], some simple examples of conjugate points in the Volumorphism group were constructed, answering Arnold's first question in the affirmative. More examples were later provided by Misiolek [M2], Preston [P2], and Shnirelman [Sh2]. In contrast with finite dimensional geometry, two types of conjugate points can occur in infinite dimensions. Grossman [Gro] gave the first examples of the two types of conjugacies that may occur: on a sphere in Hilbert space the differential of the exponential map may have infinite dimensional kernel corresponding to an infinite-dimensional family of geodesics joining two antipodal points. In addition, on an infinite dimensional ellipsoid the exponential map differential fails to be surjective, even though it is injective, in certain directions. s A natural question to ask is whether conjugate points exist on D!. This is the contents of chapter 3: Some simple examples of conjugate points are constructed on the Symplectomorphism group of the complex projective plane. In particular, 3 s n n Theorem. (3.4.3) Conjugate points exist on D! (CP ), for s > 2 + 1 and n ≥ 2. s We then show that geodesics which lie in the isometry subgroup of D! always carry conjugate points, all of which have even multiplicity. 2 Theorem. (3.6.2, 3.6.4) Let η(t) = exp(tvo) be a geodesic of the L metric (1.1) generated by a Killing vector field vo. Let J(t) be a Jacobi field along η(t), with 0 initial conditions J(0) = 0, J (0) = wo. Then tKv0 −tKv e − I J(t) = Dη(t) · e 0 w0; Kv0 s where Kvo (·) is a compact, skew self-adjoint operator on TeD!, and we have the −tK R itλ etKv0 −I R eitλ−1 spectral representations e vo = e dE(λ) and = dE(λ) which R Kv0 R iλ s are linear operators on TeD!.
Recommended publications
  • Density of Thin Film Billiard Reflection Pseudogroup in Hamiltonian Symplectomorphism Pseudogroup Alexey Glutsyuk
    Density of thin film billiard reflection pseudogroup in Hamiltonian symplectomorphism pseudogroup Alexey Glutsyuk To cite this version: Alexey Glutsyuk. Density of thin film billiard reflection pseudogroup in Hamiltonian symplectomor- phism pseudogroup. 2020. hal-03026432v2 HAL Id: hal-03026432 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03026432v2 Preprint submitted on 6 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Density of thin film billiard reflection pseudogroup in Hamiltonian symplectomorphism pseudogroup Alexey Glutsyuk∗yzx December 3, 2020 Abstract Reflections from hypersurfaces act by symplectomorphisms on the space of oriented lines with respect to the canonical symplectic form. We consider an arbitrary C1-smooth hypersurface γ ⊂ Rn+1 that is either a global strictly convex closed hypersurface, or a germ of hy- persurface. We deal with the pseudogroup generated by compositional ratios of reflections from γ and of reflections from its small deforma- tions. In the case, when γ is a global convex hypersurface, we show that the latter pseudogroup is dense in the pseudogroup of Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms between subdomains of the phase cylinder: the space of oriented lines intersecting γ transversally. We prove an analogous local result in the case, when γ is a germ.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 1: Basic Concepts, Problems, and Examples
    LECTURE 1: BASIC CONCEPTS, PROBLEMS, AND EXAMPLES WEIMIN CHEN, UMASS, SPRING 07 In this lecture we give a general introduction to the basic concepts and some of the fundamental problems in symplectic geometry/topology, where along the way various examples are also given for the purpose of illustration. We will often give statements without proofs, which means that their proof is either beyond the scope of this course or will be treated more systematically in later lectures. 1. Symplectic Manifolds Throughout we will assume that M is a C1-smooth manifold without boundary (unless specific mention is made to the contrary). Very often, M will also be closed (i.e., compact). Definition 1.1. A symplectic structure on a smooth manifold M is a 2-form ! 2 Ω2(M), which is (1) nondegenerate, and (2) closed (i.e. d! = 0). (Recall that a 2-form ! 2 Ω2(M) is said to be nondegenerate if for every point p 2 M, !(u; v) = 0 for all u 2 TpM implies v 2 TpM equals 0.) The pair (M; !) is called a symplectic manifold. Before we discuss examples of symplectic manifolds, we shall first derive some im- mediate consequences of a symplectic structure. (1) The nondegeneracy condition on ! is equivalent to the condition that M has an even dimension 2n and the top wedge product !n ≡ ! ^ ! · · · ^ ! is nowhere vanishing on M, i.e., !n is a volume form. In particular, M must be orientable, and is canonically oriented by !n. The nondegeneracy condition is also equivalent to the condition that M is almost complex, i.e., there exists an endomorphism J of TM such that J 2 = −Id.
    [Show full text]
  • Symplectic Topology Math 705 Notes by Patrick Lei, Spring 2020
    Symplectic Topology Math 705 Notes by Patrick Lei, Spring 2020 Lectures by R. Inanç˙ Baykur University of Massachusetts Amherst Disclaimer These notes were taken during lecture using the vimtex package of the editor neovim. Any errors are mine and not the instructor’s. In addition, my notes are picture-free (but will include commutative diagrams) and are a mix of my mathematical style (omit lengthy computations, use category theory) and that of the instructor. If you find any errors, please contact me at [email protected]. Contents Contents • 2 1 January 21 • 5 1.1 Course Description • 5 1.2 Organization • 5 1.2.1 Notational conventions•5 1.3 Basic Notions • 5 1.4 Symplectic Linear Algebra • 6 2 January 23 • 8 2.1 More Basic Linear Algebra • 8 2.2 Compatible Complex Structures and Inner Products • 9 3 January 28 • 10 3.1 A Big Theorem • 10 3.2 More Compatibility • 11 4 January 30 • 13 4.1 Homework Exercises • 13 4.2 Subspaces of Symplectic Vector Spaces • 14 5 February 4 • 16 5.1 Linear Algebra, Conclusion • 16 5.2 Symplectic Vector Bundles • 16 6 February 6 • 18 6.1 Proof of Theorem 5.11 • 18 6.2 Vector Bundles, Continued • 18 6.3 Compatible Triples on Manifolds • 19 7 February 11 • 21 7.1 Obtaining Compatible Triples • 21 7.2 Complex Structures • 21 8 February 13 • 23 2 3 8.1 Kähler Forms Continued • 23 8.2 Some Algebraic Geometry • 24 8.3 Stein Manifolds • 25 9 February 20 • 26 9.1 Stein Manifolds Continued • 26 9.2 Topological Properties of Kähler Manifolds • 26 9.3 Complex and Symplectic Structures on 4-Manifolds • 27 10 February 25
    [Show full text]
  • Double Groupoids and the Symplectic Category
    JOURNAL OF GEOMETRIC MECHANICS doi:10.3934/jgm.2018009 c American Institute of Mathematical Sciences Volume 10, Number 2, June 2018 pp. 217{250 DOUBLE GROUPOIDS AND THE SYMPLECTIC CATEGORY Santiago Canez~ Department of Mathematics Northwestern University 2033 Sheridan Road Evanston, IL 60208-2730, USA (Communicated by Henrique Bursztyn) Abstract. We introduce the notion of a symplectic hopfoid, a \groupoid-like" object in the category of symplectic manifolds whose morphisms are given by canonical relations. Such groupoid-like objects arise when applying a version of the cotangent functor to the structure maps of a Lie groupoid. We show that such objects are in one-to-one correspondence with symplectic double groupoids, generalizing a result of Zakrzewski concerning symplectic double groups and Hopf algebra objects in the aforementioned category. The proof relies on a new realization of the core of a symplectic double groupoid as a symplectic quotient of the total space. The resulting constructions apply more generally to give a correspondence between double Lie groupoids and groupoid- like objects in the category of smooth manifolds and smooth relations, and we show that the cotangent functor relates the two constructions. 1. Introduction. The symplectic category is the category-like structure whose objects are symplectic manifolds and morphisms are canonical relations, i.e. La- grangian submanifolds of products of symplectic manifolds. Although compositions in this \category" are only defined between certain morphisms, this concept has nonetheless proved to be useful for describing many constructions in symplectic ge- ometry in a more categorical manner; in particular, symplectic groupoids can be characterized as certain monoid objects in this category, and Hamiltonian actions can be described as actions of such monoids.
    [Show full text]
  • A C1 Arnol'd-Liouville Theorem
    A C1 Arnol’d-Liouville theorem Marie-Claude Arnaud, Jinxin Xue To cite this version: Marie-Claude Arnaud, Jinxin Xue. A C1 Arnol’d-Liouville theorem. 2016. hal-01422530v2 HAL Id: hal-01422530 https://hal-univ-avignon.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01422530v2 Preprint submitted on 16 Aug 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A C1 ARNOL’D-LIOUVILLE THEOREM MARIE-CLAUDE ARNAUD†, JINXIN XUE Abstract. In this paper, we prove a version of Arnol’d-Liouville theorem for C1 commuting Hamiltonians. We show that the Lipschitz regularity of the foliation by invariant Lagrangian tori is crucial to determine the Dynamics on each Lagrangian torus and that the C1 regularity of the foliation by invariant Lagrangian tori is crucial to prove the continuity of Arnol’d- Liouville coordinates. We also explore various notions of C0 and Lipschitz integrability. Dedicated to Jean-Christophe Yoccoz 1. Introduction and Main Results. This article elaborates on the following question. Question. If a Hamiltonian system has enough commuting integrals1, can we precisely describe the Hamiltonian Dynamics, even in the case of non C2 integrals? When the integrals are C2, Arnol’d-Liouville Theorem (see [4]) gives such a dynamical description.
    [Show full text]
  • Homotopy Type of Symplectomorphism Groups of S2 × S2 S´Ilvia Anjos
    ISSN 1364-0380 (on line) 1465-3060 (printed) 195 Geometry & Topology Volume 6 (2002) 195–218 Published: 27 April 2002 Homotopy type of symplectomorphism groups of S2 × S2 S´ılvia Anjos Departamento de Matem´atica Instituto Superior T´ecnico, Lisbon, Portugal Email: [email protected] Abstract In this paper we discuss the topology of the symplectomorphism group of a product of two 2–dimensional spheres when the ratio of their areas lies in the interval (1,2]. More precisely we compute the homotopy type of this sym- plectomorphism group and we also show that the group contains two finite dimensional Lie groups generating the homotopy. A key step in this work is to calculate the mod 2 homology of the group of symplectomorphisms. Although this homology has a finite number of generators with respect to the Pontryagin product, it is unexpected large containing in particular a free noncommutative ring with 3 generators. AMS Classification numbers Primary: 57S05, 57R17 Secondary: 57T20, 57T25 Keywords: Symplectomorphism group, Pontryagin ring, homotopy equiva- lence Proposed:YashaEliashberg Received:1October2001 Seconded: TomaszMrowka,JohnMorgan Revised: 11March2002 c Geometry & Topology Publications 196 S´ılvia Anjos 1 Introduction In general symplectomorphism groups are thought to be intermediate objects between Lie groups and full groups of diffeomorphisms. Although very little is known about the topology of groups of diffeomorphisms, there are some cases when the corresponding symplectomorphism groups are more understandable. For example, nothing is known about the group of compactly supported dif- feomorphisms of R4 , but in 1985, Gromov showed in [4] that the group of compactly supported symplectomorphisms of R4 with its standard symplectic structure is contractible.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamiltonian and Symplectic Symmetries: an Introduction
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 54, Number 3, July 2017, Pages 383–436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/bull/1572 Article electronically published on March 6, 2017 HAMILTONIAN AND SYMPLECTIC SYMMETRIES: AN INTRODUCTION ALVARO´ PELAYO In memory of Professor J.J. Duistermaat (1942–2010) Abstract. Classical mechanical systems are modeled by a symplectic mani- fold (M,ω), and their symmetries are encoded in the action of a Lie group G on M by diffeomorphisms which preserve ω. These actions, which are called sym- plectic, have been studied in the past forty years, following the works of Atiyah, Delzant, Duistermaat, Guillemin, Heckman, Kostant, Souriau, and Sternberg in the 1970s and 1980s on symplectic actions of compact Abelian Lie groups that are, in addition, of Hamiltonian type, i.e., they also satisfy Hamilton’s equations. Since then a number of connections with combinatorics, finite- dimensional integrable Hamiltonian systems, more general symplectic actions, and topology have flourished. In this paper we review classical and recent re- sults on Hamiltonian and non-Hamiltonian symplectic group actions roughly starting from the results of these authors. This paper also serves as a quick introduction to the basics of symplectic geometry. 1. Introduction Symplectic geometry is concerned with the study of a notion of signed area, rather than length, distance, or volume. It can be, as we will see, less intuitive than Euclidean or metric geometry and it is taking mathematicians many years to understand its intricacies (which is work in progress). The word “symplectic” goes back to the 1946 book [164] by Hermann Weyl (1885–1955) on classical groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Symplectic Embedding Problems, Old and New
    BULLETIN (New Series) OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 55, Number 2, April 2018, Pages 139–182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/bull/1587 Article electronically published on August 11, 2017 SYMPLECTIC EMBEDDING PROBLEMS, OLD AND NEW FELIX SCHLENK Abstract. We describe old and new motivations to study symplectic embed- ding problems, and we discuss a few of the many old and the many new results on symplectic embeddings. Contents 1. Introduction 139 2. Meanings of “symplectic” 146 3. From Newtonian mechanics to symplectic geometry 148 4. Why study symplectic embedding problems 152 5. Euclidean symplectic volume preserving 158 6. Symplectic ellipsoids 162 7. The role of J-holomorphic curves 166 8. The fine structure of symplectic rigidity 170 9. Packing flexibility for linear tori 174 10. Intermediate symplectic capacities or shadows do not exist 176 Acknowledgments 178 About the author 178 References 178 1. Introduction 4 Consider Table 1.1 where pk is the percentage of the volume of the box [0, 1] ⊂ R4 thatcanbefilledbyk disjoint symplectically embedded balls of equal radius. What does symplectic mean? Why do we care about knowing these numbers? How can one find them? How can one understand them? The first goal of this text is to answer these questions. Table 1.1 k 1234 5 6 7 8 1 2 8 9 48 224 pk 2 1 3 9 10 49 225 1 Received by the editors February 18, 2017. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 53D35; Secondary 37B40, 53D40. The author is partially supported by SNF grant 200020-144432/1. c 2017 American Mathematical Society
    [Show full text]
  • Symplectic Geometry Definitions
    Part III | Symplectic Geometry Definitions Based on lectures by A. R. Pires Notes taken by Dexter Chua Lent 2018 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them (often significantly) after lectures. They are nowhere near accurate representations of what was actually lectured, and in particular, all errors are almost surely mine. The first part of the course will be an overview of the basic structures of symplectic ge- ometry, including symplectic linear algebra, symplectic manifolds, symplectomorphisms, Darboux theorem, cotangent bundles, Lagrangian submanifolds, and Hamiltonian sys- tems. The course will then go further into two topics. The first one is moment maps and toric symplectic manifolds, and the second one is capacities and symplectic embedding problems. Pre-requisites Some familiarity with basic notions from Differential Geometry and Algebraic Topology will be assumed. The material covered in the respective Michaelmas Term courses would be more than enough background. 1 Contents III Symplectic Geometry (Definitions) Contents 1 Symplectic manifolds 3 1.1 Symplectic linear algebra . .3 1.2 Symplectic manifolds . .3 1.3 Symplectomorphisms and Lagrangians . .3 1.4 Periodic points of symplectomorphisms . .3 1.5 Lagrangian submanifolds and fixed points . .4 2 Complex structures 5 2.1 Almost complex structures . .5 2.2 Dolbeault theory . .5 2.3 K¨ahlermanifolds . .6 2.4 Hodge theory . .6 3 Hamiltonian vector fields 7 3.1 Hamiltonian vector fields . .7 3.2 Integrable systems . .7 3.3 Classical mechanics . .7 3.4 Hamiltonian actions . .8 3.5 Symplectic reduction . .8 3.6 The convexity theorem . .9 3.7 Toric manifolds .
    [Show full text]
  • Symplectic Geometry
    Part III | Symplectic Geometry Based on lectures by A. R. Pires Notes taken by Dexter Chua Lent 2018 These notes are not endorsed by the lecturers, and I have modified them (often significantly) after lectures. They are nowhere near accurate representations of what was actually lectured, and in particular, all errors are almost surely mine. The first part of the course will be an overview of the basic structures of symplectic ge- ometry, including symplectic linear algebra, symplectic manifolds, symplectomorphisms, Darboux theorem, cotangent bundles, Lagrangian submanifolds, and Hamiltonian sys- tems. The course will then go further into two topics. The first one is moment maps and toric symplectic manifolds, and the second one is capacities and symplectic embedding problems. Pre-requisites Some familiarity with basic notions from Differential Geometry and Algebraic Topology will be assumed. The material covered in the respective Michaelmas Term courses would be more than enough background. 1 Contents III Symplectic Geometry Contents 1 Symplectic manifolds 3 1.1 Symplectic linear algebra . .3 1.2 Symplectic manifolds . .4 1.3 Symplectomorphisms and Lagrangians . .8 1.4 Periodic points of symplectomorphisms . 11 1.5 Lagrangian submanifolds and fixed points . 13 2 Complex structures 16 2.1 Almost complex structures . 16 2.2 Dolbeault theory . 18 2.3 K¨ahlermanifolds . 21 2.4 Hodge theory . 24 3 Hamiltonian vector fields 30 3.1 Hamiltonian vector fields . 30 3.2 Integrable systems . 32 3.3 Classical mechanics . 34 3.4 Hamiltonian actions . 36 3.5 Symplectic reduction . 39 3.6 The convexity theorem . 45 3.7 Toric manifolds . 51 4 Symplectic embeddings 56 Index 57 2 1 Symplectic manifolds III Symplectic Geometry 1 Symplectic manifolds 1.1 Symplectic linear algebra In symplectic geometry, we study symplectic manifolds.
    [Show full text]
  • SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY Lecture Notes, University of Toronto
    SYMPLECTIC GEOMETRY Eckhard Meinrenken Lecture Notes, University of Toronto These are lecture notes for two courses, taught at the University of Toronto in Spring 1998 and in Fall 2000. Our main sources have been the books “Symplectic Techniques” by Guillemin-Sternberg and “Introduction to Symplectic Topology” by McDuff-Salamon, and the paper “Stratified symplectic spaces and reduction”, Ann. of Math. 134 (1991) by Sjamaar-Lerman. Contents Chapter 1. Linear symplectic algebra 5 1. Symplectic vector spaces 5 2. Subspaces of a symplectic vector space 6 3. Symplectic bases 7 4. Compatible complex structures 7 5. The group Sp(E) of linear symplectomorphisms 9 6. Polar decomposition of symplectomorphisms 11 7. Maslov indices and the Lagrangian Grassmannian 12 8. The index of a Lagrangian triple 14 9. Linear Reduction 18 Chapter 2. Review of Differential Geometry 21 1. Vector fields 21 2. Differential forms 23 Chapter 3. Foundations of symplectic geometry 27 1. Definition of symplectic manifolds 27 2. Examples 27 3. Basic properties of symplectic manifolds 34 Chapter 4. Normal Form Theorems 43 1. Moser’s trick 43 2. Homotopy operators 44 3. Darboux-Weinstein theorems 45 Chapter 5. Lagrangian fibrations and action-angle variables 49 1. Lagrangian fibrations 49 2. Action-angle coordinates 53 3. Integrable systems 55 4. The spherical pendulum 56 Chapter 6. Symplectic group actions and moment maps 59 1. Background on Lie groups 59 2. Generating vector fields for group actions 60 3. Hamiltonian group actions 61 4. Examples of Hamiltonian G-spaces 63 3 4 CONTENTS 5. Symplectic Reduction 72 6. Normal forms and the Duistermaat-Heckman theorem 78 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Symplectomorphism Groups and Isotropic Skeletons Joseph Coffey
    ISSN 1364-0380 (on line) 1465-3060 (printed) 935 Geometry & Topology G T GG T T T Volume 9 (2005) 935–970 G T G T G T G T Published: 25 May 2005 T G T G T G T G T G G G G T T Symplectomorphism groups and isotropic skeletons Joseph Coffey Courant Institute for the Mathematical Sciences, New York University 251 Mercer Street, New York, NY 10012, USA Email: [email protected] Abstract The symplectomorphism group of a 2–dimensional surface is homotopy equiv- alent to the orbit of a filling system of curves. We give a generalization of this statement to dimension 4. The filling system of curves is replaced by a decomposition of the symplectic 4–manifold (M,ω) into a disjoint union of an isotropic 2–complex L and a disc bundle over a symplectic surface Σ which is Poincare dual to a multiple of the form ω. We show that then one can recover the homotopy type of the symplectomorphism group of M from the orbit of the pair (L, Σ). This allows us to compute the homotopy type of certain spaces of Lagrangian submanifolds, for example the space of Lagrangian RP2 ⊂ CP2 isotopic to the standard one. AMS Classification numbers Primary: 57R17 Secondary: 53D35 Keywords: Lagrangian, symplectomorphism, homotopy Proposed: Leonid Polterovich Received: 25 June 2004 Seconded: Yasha Eliashberg, Tomasz Mrowka Revised: 24 September 2004 c Geometry & Topology Publications 936 Joseph Coffey 1 Introduction 1.1 Surface diffeomorphisms A finite set L = {γi} of simple, closed, transversally intersecting parametrized curves on a surface X fills if X\{γi} consists solely of discs.
    [Show full text]