The Generic Placement of a Morphologically Enigmatic Species in Asteraceae: Evidence from ITS Sequences
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Plant Syst. Evol. 228: 63±69 .2001) The generic placement of a morphologically enigmatic species in Asteraceae: evidence from ITS sequences D. J. Crawford, R. T. Kimball, and Mes®n Tadesse Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH, USA Received August 28, 2000 Accepted February 11, 2001 Abstract. Bidens cordylocarpa is a high polyploid uncertain placement due to lack of or con¯ict- species restricted in distribution to stream sides in ing morphological characters. Recent exam- the mountains of Jalisco, Mexico. The morpholog- ples come from both family .D. E. Soltis et al. ically enigmatic species was originally described as 1999) and generic .Kim et al. 1998) levels. In a member of the genus Coreopsis, but later trans- the present study we report the utility of ferred to Bidens, largely because the involucral sequences from the internal transcribed spacer bracts appear most similar to Bidens. Characters of region of nuclear ribosomal DNA .ITS) to the cypselae, often useful in generic placement, are of no value for this species because the fruits have resolve the generic anities of a relatively rare features not detected in either Bidens or Coreopsis. species in the Asteraceae .Heliantheae: Core- Sequences from the internal transcribed spacer opsidinae). It is not surprising that sequences region of nuclear ribosomal DNA .ITS) were used from this region might prove informative given to assess the relationships of Bidens cordylocarpa. their proven wide application in molecular The molecular phylogeny places B. cordylocarpa in phylogenetic studies at the speci®c and generic a strongly supported clade of Mexican and South levels .Baldwin 1992, Baldwin et al. 1995). American Bidens, and provides more de®nitive The enigmatic species in question in the evidence of relationships than morphology, chro- present study is endemic to stream sides and mosome number, or secondary chemistry. Molec- running water in the mountains of the Mexican ular, morphological, and chromosomal data state of Jalisco. The taxonomic history of the suggest that B. cordylocarpa is an ancient poly- species was presented earlier .Crawford 1971), ploid, perhaps the remnant of a polyploid complex. and thus a brief summary will suce. Coreopsis Key words: Bidens cordylocarpa, Coreopsis, cordylocarpa A. Gray ex S. Wats was described Asteraceae, ITS sequences, phylogeny. by Asa Gray in 1887 .Watson 1887). In two comprehensive treatments of Coreopsis, Sher In addition to providing extensive phylogenet- .1936) and Sher and Alexander .1955) placed ic insights at the highest levels of ¯owering C. cordylocarpa in sect. Coreopsis, where it plants .e.g. P. S. Soltis et al. 1999), DNA seems out of place with the largely North sequence data may be used to address more American annuals and herbaceous perennials, narrowly focused questions, including eluci- but did not comment on the species. However, dating the relationships for those taxa of later Sher indicated on a specimen of 64 D. J. Crawford et al.: ITS sequences and generic assignment C. cordylocarpa in the Field Museum collected often employed to delimit Bidens and Coreop- by Arthur Cronquist .Cronquist 9779) that it sis, imperfect as they are, are of little value for was the type of a new species of Bidens that he placing this species. This problem is particu- intended to name in Cronquist's honor. The larly true for the cypselae because in B. name was never published, and still later Sher cordylocarpa they are elongate, club-shaped, annotated the specimen as C. cordylocarpa. very obscurely quadrangular .essentially tere- This suggests that Sher had doubts about the te), obscurely lengthwise-striate, glabrous, generic placement of the species. wingless, contracted at the apex and with a Morphological distinctions between the small, bald disk. Crawford .1971) emphasized two large, variable genera Bidens and Coreop- that this combination of features distinguishes sis are tenuous at best. Although a number of the cypselae from the typically ¯at, winged characters in combination are often useful for fruits often found in Coreopsis. Crawford telling the genera apart, no single character .1971) suggested that the cypselae of B. cord- serves to distinguish them .Sher and Alexan- ylocarpa are most similar to Bidens in general der 1955; Mes®n 1984, 1986, 1993; Mes®n shape. However, the combination of features et al. 1995). Sher and Alexander .1955), in a including nearly terete in cross section, lack of footnote on the ®rst page of their treatment of de®nite ribs, and almost obscure longitudinal Heliantheae-Coreopsidinae for North America, striations distinguish B. cordylocarpa from commented that Bidens and Coreopsis, togeth- most other species of Bidens. General cypselae er with the genus Cosmos, ``constitute fairly shape, and particularly features of the involu- natural and easily distinguishable groups but cral bracts, prompted Crawford .1971) to cannot be separated de®nitely by any one transfer the species to Bidens. While admitted- character.'' A cladistic study of morphological ly preliminary, comparative ¯avonoid chemis- characters by Ryding and Bremer .1992) try of B. cordylocarpa suggested a closer provided no support for Bidens and Coreopsis relationship to Bidens than to Coreopsis. The as sister taxa, and Karis and Ryding .1994) chromosome number of 2n ca. 146, deter- questioned whether either genus as now rec- mined from four dierent populations, sug- ognized is monophyletic. Mes®n et al. .in gests that the species may be a dodecaploid manuscript) have carried out a more extensive .12x) on a base number of 12, a base number cladistic analysis of Coreopsidinae, and the known for both Bidens and Coreopsis .Smith results are similar to those found in the other 1975, 1989; Robinson et al. 1981). two investigations, i.e., the two genera are not Given the equivocal nature of other data monophyletic. A recent study using ITS se- for placement of B. cordylocarpa, a molecular quence data provides compelling evidence that phylogenetic study utilizing ITS sequences was neither genus as now circumscribed is mono- initiated in order to provide re®ned insights phyletic .Kim et al. 1999). Kim et al. .1999) into the relationships of the species. Sequences did, however, identify strongly supported from the ITS region have proven useful for monophyletic groups restricted to speci®c resolving relationships in Bidens and Coreopsis geographical areas. .Kim et al. 1999), and sequences from a With the lack of a de®ning character for diverse array of taxa in the two genera were Bidens or Coreopsis, placing a species in either available from earlier studies .Kim et al. 1999, genus as now de®ned can be problematic if Ganders et al. 2000) for analyses with sequenc- that species lacks one or more of the ``impor- es from B. cordylocarpa. tant'' characters making up the suite of features normally employed in generic place- ment. The generic assignment of Bidens cor- Materials and methods dylocarpa .A. Gray ex S. Wats) Crawford is Total DNA was isolated from dried material particularly challenging because characters .Melchert, Sorensen & Crawford 6347 & 6371, D. J. Crawford et al.: ITS sequences and generic assignment 65 vouchers in IA, OS and RM) using CTAB .Doyle mum likelihood estimation of the transition-trans- and Doyle 1987). PCRampli®cation of the entire version ratio. For maximum likelihood analysis, ITS region was obtained using primer ITS4 .White the estimated transition-transversion ratio was used et al. 1990) and a modi®ed version of the White in a heuristic search with 10 random sequence et al. .1990) primer ITS5 .Kim et al. 1999). PCR additions and TBRbranch swapping. ampli®cations were performed using a hot start The relative rates test was performed using a followed by standard cycling conditions. Negative modi®cation of the method proposed by Wu and Li controls were run to detect contamination. PCR .1985). Brie¯y, all possible quartets of sequences products were puri®ed using QIAquick PCRclean- that included an ingroup Bidens sequence, B. cor- up columns .Qiagen, Inc.). dylocarpa, and two outgroup sequences .B. presti- Sequencing reactions were performed using the naria and B. pachyloma) were extracted and ML Big DyeTM Terminator Kit .PE Applied Biosys- estimates of branch lengths were calculated using tems). Manufacturers recommendations were fol- PUZZLE 4.0.1 .Strimmer and von Haeseler 1996) lowed except that reaction volumes were reduced. and the HKY85 model of sequence evolution. The Sequence reactions were performed using the transition-transversion ratio was estimated simul- ampli®cation primers described above, as well as taneously for each quartet in PUZZLE. This two internal primers .ITS2 and ITS3; White et al. technique was employed because it provides esti- 1990). Sequences were analyzed using an ABI mates for the standard error of the estimated PrismTM 310 genetic analyzer. Chromatographs branch lengths. To conduct the relative rates test, were examined individually, then assembled into the dierence in estimated branch lengths was double-stranded contigs. calculated, and the variance of the dierence was Sequences for comparison were taken from computed using the sum of the variances for each recently published ITS phylogenies .Kim et al. branch length .see Wu and Li 1985). Since the 1999, Ganders et al. 2000). ITS sequences were variances of individual branch lengths were used, it initially aligned in ClustalW .Thompson et al. was unnecessary to estimate the covariances of 1994), then manually optimized by eye. The distance estimates. alignment was trimmed and the 5.8S region deleted to match outgroup sequences .Kim et al. 1999). Since homology of some indels was not certain, all Results sites with gaps, and any neighboring sites where The two accessions, collected from two dier- gaps could be placed, were removed from one data ent populations, had identical sequences .Gen- set to examine the eects of gap placement and bank accession numbers AF331961 and treatment on the results. AF331962 for Melchert, Sorensen & Crawford Phylogenetic analyses were performed using PAUP* 4.0b2a .Swoord 1999).