DOCSLIB.ORG

Differential Expression of Estrogen Receptor Α, Β1, and Β2 in Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Differential Expression of Estrogen Receptor Α, Β1, and Β2 in Lobular and Ductal Breast Cancer Differential expression of estrogen receptor α, β1, and β2 in lobular and ductal breast cancer Bo Huanga, Yoko Omotob,c, Hirotaka Iwased, Hiroko Yamashitac, Tatsuya Toyamac, Raoul Charles Coombese, Aleksandra Filipovice, Margaret Warnera, and Jan-Åke Gustafssona,b,1 aCenter for Nuclear Receptors and Cell Signaling, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204; bDepartment of BioSciences and Nutrition, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, SE-141 86 Huddinge, Sweden; cOncology, Immunology and Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601, Japan; dDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan; and eDivision of Cancer, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom Contributed by Jan-Åke Gustafsson, December 19, 2013 (sent for review November 1, 2013) The role of estrogen receptor (ER) α as a target in treatment of from one patient and normal tissue from another patient (8–10). breast cancer is clear, but those of ERβ1 and ERβ2 in the breast Samples taken from different patients have intrinsic limitation remain unclear. We have examined expression of all three recep- (i.e., they cannot account for variations between different patients). tors in surgically excised breast samples from two archives: (i): 187 In addition, because tumors are heterogeneous, core biopsies do invasive ductal breast cancer from a Japanese study; and (ii)20 not fully reflect the histological and biological diversity of breast lobular and 24 ductal cancers from the Imperial College. Samples tumors (29). contained normal areas, areas of hyperplasia, and in situ and in- The roles of ERβ1 and its splice variant ERβ2 in breast cancer vasive cancer. In the normal areas, ERα was expressed in not more are still unclear. As reviewed by Murphy and Leygue (30), some than 10% of epithelium, whereas approximately 80% of epithelial studies show a loss of ERβ1 as ductal cancer progresses, but cells expressed ERβ. We found that whereas ductal cancer is a others do not. Some studies show ERβ2asamarkerofbad highly proliferative, ERα-positive, ERβ-negative disease, lobular prognosis (31), and others not (19). Some of these differences cancer expresses both ERα and ERβ but with very few Ki67-posi- may be due to differences in antibody use and differences in tive cells. ERβ2 was expressed in 32% of the ductal cancers, of tissue fixation and handling. which 83% were postmenopausal. In all ERβ2-positive cancers When ERα and ERβ are coexpressed in breast cancer it is the interductal space was filled with dense collagen, and cell nuclei unclear whether tamoxifen treatment will be successful. This is expressed hypoxia-inducible factor 1α.ERβ2 expression was not because tamoxifen acts as an agonist of ERβ at activator protein confined to malignant cells but was strong in stromal, immune, 1 (AP-1) sites (32) and thus should oppose the antiproliferative and endothelial cells. In most of the high-grade invasive ductal effects of the tamoxifen–ERα complex. Yan et al. (33) have found cancers neither ERα nor ERβ was expressed, but in the high-grade that expression of ERβ predicts tamoxifen benefit in patients with lobularcancerERβ was lost and ERα and Ki67 expression were ERα-negative early breast cancer, whereas Esslimani-Sahla et al abundant. The data show a clear difference in ER expression be- (23) have found that low ERβ level is an independent marker, tween lobular and ductal breast cancer and suggest (i) that tamox- better than ERα level, to predict tamoxifen resistance. Although ifen may be more effective in late than in early lobular cancer and apparently saying different things, these two results actually agree (ii) a potential role for ERβ agonists in preventing in situ ductal with each other: in ERα-negative breast cancer, estrogen is not cancers from becoming invasive. driving proliferation, so tamoxifen via ERβ may interfere with another growth signaling pathway. In ERα-positive cancers whose ductal carcinoma in situ | invasive ductal carcinoma | proliferation is driven by E2, tamoxifen with ERβ would oppose invasive lobular carcinoma the antiproliferative effects of the ERα–tamoxifen complex. Investigation of the expression pattern of ERβ in normal tis- espite decades of research, the etiology of breast cancer sue, DCIS, and IDC is important to understand the function of Dremains unclear. It is currently thought that most breast this receptor in the progression of breast cancer. We have a set cancers occur in the normal terminal duct lobular unit and of samples obtained from surgical excision of breast tumors from progress in a stepwise fashion over time (1). Ductal carcinoma women before pharmacological intervention. The cohorts in- in situ (DCIS) means the cancer has not spread beyond the duct clude lobular cancer, which has not yet been thoroughly studied into any normal surrounding breast tissue and is thought by some for ERβ expression. Lobular cancer is an ERα-positive form of to be the direct precursor of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). breast cancer characterized by loss of E-cadherin and relatively Estrogens play an important role in normal breast develop- MEDICAL SCIENCES ment as well as breast cancer progression (2). Most of the effects Significance of estrogen are mediated through its two receptors: estrogen α α β β α – receptor (ER ) and (ER ) (3). ER is expressed in 50 80% Whether breast cancer will respond to the antiestrogen ta- of breast tumors, and its presence is the main indicator for anti- moxifen is determined by whether cellular proliferation is es- hormonal therapy (4). ERβ was first discovered in 1996, and its α – trogen receptor (ER) -mediated. As opposed to early ductal role in breast cancer is still being explored (5 7). cancer, which is an ERα-rich, proliferating disease, in early The first step in understanding the role of ERβ in breast α β β lobular cancer both ER and ER are abundantly expressed and cancer was to define the expression pattern of ER in the normal proliferation is rare. In advanced lobular cancer, ERβ is lost, ERα human breast and in various stages of cancer. Since its discovery, β is retained, and proliferation is high. Thus, tamoxifen may be several laboratories have reported ER expression in clinical an effective pharmaceutical in late but not early lobular cancer. samples (8–28). Most of these studies investigated the expression β – – of ER in invasive breast cancer samples (12 15, 17, 19, 21 23). Author contributions: B.H., M.W., and J.-Å.G. designed research; B.H., Y.O., and M.W. Some studies have reported ERβ expression in invasive breast performed research; H.I., H.Y., T.T., R.C.C., and A.F. contributed new reagents/analytic cancer and normal breast tissue (11, 18, 26–28), but few have tools; B.H., M.W., and J.-Å.G. analyzed data; and B.H., M.W., and J.-Å.G. wrote the paper. compared the expression of ERβ in the normal tissue, DCIS, and The authors declare no conflict of interest. IDC within the same sample. Usually tumor samples are taken 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1323719111 PNAS | February 4, 2014 | vol. 111 | no. 5 | 1933–1938 Downloaded by guest on September 29, 2021 Fig. 1. Expression of ERα and ERβ in normal tissue, DCIS, and IDC. (A) Representative immunohistochemical staining of ERα and ERβ in normal breast tissue, DCIS, and IDC. (Scale bars, 25 μm.) (B) Box chart of Allred scores of ERα and ERβ (n = 94) staining. Bottoms and tops of the boxes are the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively; the lines across the boxes are the median values; the ends of the whiskers represent 10th and 90th percentiles; asterisks represent the minimum and maximum of all of the data (*P < 0.0001). (C) Box chart of Allred scores of ERα and ERβ staining (n = 115). Description of box chart is the same as in B (*P < 0.0001, **P = 0.01). (D) Box chart of Allred scores of ERα and ERβ (n = 94) staining. Description of the box chart is the same as in B (*P < 0.0001, **P = 0.03). low proliferation rate. It is accompanied by a resistance to anoikis showed that the changes in expression levels of ERα and ERβ, (34). It accounts for 10–15% of diagnosed breast cancer, and there which occur in the transition between normal epithelium and are still many questions about the optimal therapeutic approach DCIS, were significant (Fig. 1B, Left and Right,*P < 0.0001). to this cancer. We have explored the changes in expression of Progression from in situ to invasive carcinoma is the first step the two ERs using identical protocols and reagents in different in malignancy. As shown in Fig. 1 A, b and e,ERα expression was developmental stages of breastcancerwithineachpatient. Results Comparison of ERα and ERβ in Normal Breast Epithelium, DCIS, and IDC. The ERβ antibody for the immunohistochemistry is ERβ 503 IgY antibody, which has been used previously (35). Represen- tative staining is shown in Fig. 1A. There were 94 patients who had both normal tissue and DCIS, 115 patients in whose sections there was both DCIS and IDC, and 94 patient samples in which there was normal breast tissue, DCIS, and IDC. In normal breast tissue there was robust expression of ERα in approximately 10% of epithelial cells (Fig. 1 A, a), whereas ERβ was expressed in more than 70% of epithelial cells with in- termediate to strong signals (Fig. 1 A, d). In DCIS the percent- α Fig. 2. Correlation of ERα and ERβ expression with histological grades in IDC.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Estrogen Receptor Isoforms and Variants in Breast Cancer Cell Lines
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MeDICINE 2: 537-544, 2011 Analysis of estrogen receptor isoforms and variants in breast cancer cell lines MAIE AL-BADER1, CHRISTOPHER FORD2, BUSHRA AL-AYADHY3 and ISSAM FRANCIS3 Departments of 1Physiology, 2Surgery, and 3Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat 13110, Kuwait Received November 22, 2010; Accepted February 14, 2011 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2011.226 Abstract. In the present study, the expression of estrogen domain C, the DNA binding domain; domains D/E, bearing receptor (ER)α and ERβ isoforms in ER-positive (MCF7, both the activation function-2 (AF-2) and the ligand binding T-47D and ZR-75-1) and ER-negative (MDA-MB-231, SK-BR-3, domains; and finally, domain F, the C-terminal domain (6,7). MDA-MB-453 and HCC1954) breast cancer cell lines was The actions of estrogens are mediated by binding to ERs investigated. ERα mRNA was expressed in ER-positive and (ERα and/or ERβ). These receptors, which are co-expressed some ER-negative cell lines. ERα ∆3, ∆5 and ∆7 spliced in a number of tissues, form functional homodimers or variants were present in MCF7 and T-47D cells; ERα ∆5 heterodimers. When bound to estrogens as homodimers, the and ∆7 spliced variants were detected in ZR-75-1 cells. transcription of target genes is activated (8,9), while as heterodi- MDA-MB-231 and HCC1954 cells expressed ERα ∆5 and ∆7 mers, ERβ exhibits an inhibitory action on ERα-mediated gene spliced variants. The ERβ1 variant was expressed in all of the expression and, in many instances, opposes the actions of ERα cell lines and the ERβ2 variant in all of the ER-positive and (7,9).
    [Show full text]
  • Expression of Aromatase, Estrogen Receptor and , Androgen
    0031-3998/06/6006-0740 PEDIATRIC RESEARCH Vol. 60, No. 6, 2006 Copyright © 2006 International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc. Printed in U.S.A. Expression of Aromatase, Estrogen Receptor ␣ and ␤, Androgen Receptor, and Cytochrome P-450scc in the Human Early Prepubertal Testis ESPERANZA B. BERENSZTEIN, MARI´A SONIA BAQUEDANO, CANDELA R. GONZALEZ, NORA I. SARACO, JORGE RODRIGUEZ, ROBERTO PONZIO, MARCO A. RIVAROLA, AND ALICIA BELGOROSKY Research Laboratory [E.B.B., M.S.B., C.R.G., N.I.S., J.R., M.A.R., A.B.], Hospital de Pediatria Garrahan, Buenos Aires C124 5AAM, Argentina; Centro de Investigaciones en Reproduccion [R.P.], Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C112 1ABG, Argentina ABSTRACT: The expression of aromatase, estrogen receptor ␣ might affect adult testicular cell mass, as well as testicular (ER␣) and ␤ (ER␤), androgen receptor (AR), and cytochrome P-450 function (8). side chain cleavage enzyme (cP450scc) was studied in prepubertal In humans (9), there are three growth phases of LCs testis. Samples were divided in three age groups (GRs): GR1, during testicular development. Fetal LCs produce testoster- ϭ newborns (1- to 21-d-old neonates, n 5); GR2, postnatal activation one required for fetal masculinization and Insl-3, necessary ϭ stage (1- to 7-mo-old infants, n 6); GR3, childhood (12- to for testicular descent (10). They regress during the third ϭ ␣ 60-mo-old boys, n 4). Absent or very poor detection of ER by trimester of pregnancy. A second wave of infantile LCs has immunohistochemistry in all cells and by mRNA expression was been described during the postnatal surge of luteinizing observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression of Estrogen Receptor-Beta Isoforms in Barrett's
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 24: 2919-2924 (2004) Expression of Estrogen Receptor-Beta Isoforms in Barrett’s Metaplasia, Dysplasia and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma LIANG LIU, MINNI CHIRALA and MAMOUN YOUNES Departments of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine and The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, U.S.A. Abstract. We have previously shown that the majority of and beta (ER-B). ER-A is mainly expressed in female sex esophageal adenocarcinomas (EA), and its precursor Barrett’s organs, such as breast and uterus (2), whereas ER-B is metaplasia (BM), express estrogen receptor beta (ER-B). Several expressed in both sex organs and other tissues, such as isoforms of ER-B have been described and are presumed to have prostate, lung, thyroid, adrenal cortex and testis (3). Several different functions, but their distribution in BM and EA is not ER-B isoforms have been identified and characterized in known. The aim of this work was to determine which ER-B many non-gynecologic tumors including carcinomas of the isoforms are expressed in EA and BM. Sections of formalin-fixed lung (4), prostate (5), colon (6, 7) and stomach (8). and paraffin-embedded esophageal tissue from 33 esophageactomy Tamoxifen, a specific ER-B antagonist, has been successfully specimens, of which 27 had invasive EA, were stained for the ER- used in the treatment of patients with breast carcinoma B isoforms ER-B1, ER-B2, ER-B3 and ER-B5 utilizing the (9,10) and it has been shown that ER-B status is a significant immunoperoxidase method. ER-B1 was detected in 23 out of 27 predictor of survival in women with breast carcinoma treated (85%) EA compared to 3 out of 14 (21%) Barrett’s metaplasia with mastectomy and adjuvant tamoxifen (11).
    [Show full text]
  • Estrogen-Related Receptor Alpha: an Under-Appreciated Potential Target for the Treatment of Metabolic Diseases
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Estrogen-Related Receptor Alpha: An Under-Appreciated Potential Target for the Treatment of Metabolic Diseases Madhulika Tripathi, Paul Michael Yen and Brijesh Kumar Singh * Laboratory of Hormonal Regulation, Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore; [email protected] (M.T.); [email protected] (P.M.Y.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 February 2020; Accepted: 24 February 2020; Published: 28 February 2020 Abstract: The estrogen-related receptor alpha (ESRRA) is an orphan nuclear receptor (NR) that significantly influences cellular metabolism. ESRRA is predominantly expressed in metabolically-active tissues and regulates the transcription of metabolic genes, including those involved in mitochondrial turnover and autophagy. Although ESRRA activity is well-characterized in several types of cancer, recent reports suggest that it also has an important role in metabolic diseases. This minireview focuses on the regulation of cellular metabolism and function by ESRRA and its potential as a target for the treatment of metabolic disorders. Keywords: estrogen-related receptor alpha; mitophagy; mitochondrial turnover; metabolic diseases; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); adipogenesis; adaptive thermogenesis 1. Introduction When the estrogen-related receptor alpha (ESRRA) was first cloned, it was found to be a nuclear receptor (NR) that had DNA sequence homology to the estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) [1]. There are several examples of estrogen-related receptor (ESRR) and estrogen-signaling cross-talk via mutual transcriptional regulation or reciprocal binding to each other’s response elements of common target genes in a context-specific manner [2,3].
    [Show full text]
  • Estrogen Receptor a Binds to Peroxisome Proliferator ^ Activated
    Human Cancer Biology Estrogen Receptor A Binds to Peroxisome Proliferator ^ Activated Receptor Response Element and Negatively Interferes with Peroxisome Proliferator ^ Activated Receptor ; Signaling in Breast Cancer Cells Daniela Bonofiglio,1Sabrina Gabriele,1Saveria Aquila,1Stefania Catalano,1Mariaelena Gentile,2 Emilia Middea,1Francesca Giordano,2 and Sebastiano Ando' 2,3 Abstract Purpose: The molecular mechanisms involved in the repressive effects exerted by estrogen receptors (ER) on peroxisome proliferator ^ activated receptor (PPAR) g^ mediated transcriptional activity remain to be elucidated. The aim of the present study was to provide new insight into the crosstalk between ERa and PPARg pathways in breast cancer cells. Experimental Design: Using MCF7 and HeLa cells as model systems, we did transient trans- fections and electrophoretic mobility shift assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation studies to evaluate the ability of ERa to influence PPAR response element ^ mediated transcription. A pos- sible direct interaction between ERa and PPARg was ascertained by coimmunoprecipitation assay, whereas their modulatory role in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway was evaluated by determining PI3K activity and AKT phosphorylation. As a biological counter- part, we investigated the growth response to the cognate ligands of both receptors in hormone-dependent MCF7 breast cancer cells. Results:Our data show for the first time that ERa binds to PPAR response element and represses its transactivation. Moreover, we have documented the physical and functional interactions of ERa and PPARg, which also involve the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3K. Interestingly, ERa and PPARg pathways have an opposite effect on the regulation of the PI3K/AKT transduction cascade, explaining, at least in part, the divergent response exerted by the cognate ligands 17 h-estradiol and BRL49653on MCF7 cell proliferation.
    [Show full text]
  • Agonists and Knockdown of Estrogen Receptor Β Differentially Affect
    Schüler-Toprak et al. BMC Cancer (2016) 16:951 DOI 10.1186/s12885-016-2973-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Agonists and knockdown of estrogen receptor β differentially affect invasion of triple-negative breast cancer cells in vitro Susanne Schüler-Toprak1*, Julia Häring1, Elisabeth C. Inwald1, Christoph Moehle2, Olaf Ortmann1 and Oliver Treeck1 Abstract Background: Estrogen receptor β (ERβ) is expressed in the majority of invasive breast cancer cases, irrespective of their subtype, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Thus, ERβ might be a potential target for therapy of this challenging cancer type. In this in vitro study, we examined the role of ERβ in invasion of two triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. Methods: MDA-MB-231 and HS578T breast cancer cells were treated with the specific ERβ agonists ERB-041, WAY200070, Liquiritigenin and 3β-Adiol. Knockdown of ERβ expression was performed by means of siRNA transfection. Effects on cellular invasion were assessed in vitro by means of a modified Boyden chamber assay. Transcriptome analyses were performed using Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST microarrays. Pathway and gene network analyses were performed by means of Genomatix and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. Results: Invasiveness of MBA-MB-231 and HS578T breast cancer cells decreased after treatment with ERβ agonists ERB-041 and WAY200070. Agonists Liquiritigenin and 3β-Adiol only reduced invasion of MDA-MB-231 cells. Knockdown of ERβ expression increased invasiveness of MDA-MB-231 cells about 3-fold. Transcriptome and pathway analyses revealed that ERβ knockdown led to activation of TGFβ signalling and induced expression of a network of genes with functions in extracellular matrix, tumor cell invasion and vitamin D3 metabolism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure-Function Relationship of Angular Estrogens and Estrogen Receptor Alpha to Initiate Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis in Breast Cancer Cells S
    Supplemental material to this article can be found at: http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/suppl/2020/05/03/mol.120.119776.DC1 1521-0111/98/1/24–37$35.00 https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.120.119776 MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY Mol Pharmacol 98:24–37, July 2020 Copyright ª 2020 The Author(s) This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY Attribution 4.0 International license. The Structure-Function Relationship of Angular Estrogens and Estrogen Receptor Alpha to Initiate Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis in Breast Cancer Cells s Philipp Y. Maximov, Balkees Abderrahman, Yousef M. Hawsawi, Yue Chen, Charles E. Foulds, Antrix Jain, Anna Malovannaya, Ping Fan, Ramona F. Curpan, Ross Han, Sean W. Fanning, Bradley M. Broom, Daniela M. Quintana Rincon, Jeffery A. Greenland, Geoffrey L. Greene, and V. Craig Jordan Downloaded from Departments of Breast Medical Oncology (P.Y.M., B.A., P.F., D.M.Q.R., J.A.G., V.C.J.) and Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (B.M.B.), University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research (Gen.Org.), Research Center, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Y.M.H.); The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (R.H., S.W.F., G.L.G.); Center for Precision Environmental Health and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology (C.E.F.), Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Core (A.J., A.M.), Verna and Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Core (A.M.), and Dan L. Duncan molpharm.aspetjournals.org
    [Show full text]
  • The WT1 Wilms' Tumor Suppressor Gene Product Interacts with Estrogen Receptor-Α and Regulates IGF-I Receptor Gene Transcripti
    135 The WT1 Wilms’ tumor suppressor gene product interacts with estrogen receptor- and regulates IGF-I receptor gene transcription in breast cancer cells Naama Reizner, Sharon Maor, Rive Sarfstein, Shirley Abramovitch, Wade V Welshons1, Edward M Curran1, Adrian V Lee2 and Haim Werner Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel 1Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA 2Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA (Requests for offprints should be addressed to H Werner; Email: [email protected]) Abstract The IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) has an important role in breast cancer development and progression. Previous studies have suggested that the IGF-IR gene is negatively regulated by a number of transcription factors with tumor suppressor activity, including the Wilms’ tumor protein WT1. The present study was aimed at evaluating the hypothesis that IGF-IR gene transcription in breast cancer cells is under inhibitory control by WT1 and, furthermore, that the mechanism of action of WT1 involves functional and physical interactions with estrogen receptor- (ER). Results of transient coexpression experiments showed that all four predominant isoforms of WT1 (including or lacking alternatively spliced exons 5 and 9) repressed IGF-IR promoter activity by 39–49%. To examine the potential interplay between WT1 and ER in control of IGF-IR gene transcription we employed ER-depleted C4 cells that were generated by clonal selection of ER-positive MCF-7 cells that were maintained in estrogen-free conditions. IGF-IR levels in C4 cells were |43% of the values in MCF-7 cells whereas WT1 levels in C4 cells were 4·25-fold higher than in MCF-7.
    [Show full text]
  • Oestrogen Receptor α AF-1 and AF-2 Domains Have Cell
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-07175-0 OPEN Oestrogen receptor α AF-1 and AF-2 domains have cell population-specific functions in the mammary epithelium Stéphanie Cagnet1, Dalya Ataca 1, George Sflomos1, Patrick Aouad1, Sonia Schuepbach-Mallepell2, Henry Hugues3, Andrée Krust4, Ayyakkannu Ayyanan1, Valentina Scabia1 & Cathrin Brisken 1 α α 1234567890():,; Oestrogen receptor (ER ) is a transcription factor with ligand-independent and ligand- dependent activation functions (AF)-1 and -2. Oestrogens control postnatal mammary gland development acting on a subset of mammary epithelial cells (MECs), termed sensor cells, which are ERα-positive by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and secrete paracrine factors, which stimulate ERα-negative responder cells. Here we show that deletion of AF-1 or AF-2 blocks pubertal ductal growth and subsequent development because both are required for expres- sion of essential paracrine mediators. Thirty percent of the luminal cells are ERα-negative by IHC but express Esr1 transcripts. This low level ERα expression through AF-2 is essential for cell expansion during puberty and growth-inhibitory during pregnancy. Cell-intrinsic ERα is not required for cell proliferation nor for secretory differentiation but controls transcript levels of cell motility and cell adhesion genes and a stem cell and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) signature identifying ERα as a key regulator of mammary epithelial cell plasticity. 1 Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. 2 Department of Biochemistry, University of Lausanne, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland. 3 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Department of Laboratory Medecine, University Hospital of Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Estrogen Receptor B Promoter Are Associated with Colorectal Cancer Survival in Postmenopausal Women
    Published OnlineFirst November 13, 2012; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2484 Cancer Prevention and Epidemiology Research Common Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Estrogen Receptor b Promoter Are Associated with Colorectal Cancer Survival in Postmenopausal Women Michael N. Passarelli1,2, Amanda I. Phipps1, John D. Potter1,2,3, Karen W. Makar1, Anna E. Coghill1,2, Karen J. Wernli3,4, Emily White1,2, Andrew T. Chan5,6, Carolyn M. Hutter1,2, Ulrike Peters1,2, and Polly A. Newcomb1,2 Abstract Loss of estrogen receptor b (ERb) expression in the gut is associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) initiation and progression. Germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in genes for the sex-steroid hormone receptors are not strongly associated with CRC risk; however, these SNPs have not previously been evaluated in relation to survival after diagnosis. We enrolled 729 women, ages 50 to 74, diagnosed with invasive CRC between 1997 and 2002 in 13 counties covered by the Seattle-Puget Sound Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results cancer registry. Participants provided germline DNA. We selected 99 tag-SNPs for the androgen receptor (AR), ERa (ESR1), ERb (ESR2), and progesterone receptor (PGR) genes. Mortality outcomes were ascertained from the National Death Index. During a median of 6.6 years of follow-up, 244 deaths occurred (161 from CRC). We identified 20 SNPs (12 of ESR2 and 8 of PGR) for replication in 1,729 women diagnosed with incident invasive CRC (555 deaths; 405 from CRC) from three prospective cohort studies that participate in the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium. Three correlated SNPs in the promoter of ESR2 (rs2987983, rs3020443, and rs2978381) were statistically significant predictors of CRC-specific and overall survival.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Constitutive Androstane Receptor and Estrogen Sulfotransferase in Energy Homeostasis
    THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIVE ANDROSTANE RECEPTOR AND ESTROGEN SULFOTRANSFERASE IN ENERGY HOMEOSTASIS by Jie Gao Bachelor of Engineering, China Pharmaceutical University, 1999 Master of Science, China Pharmaceutical University, 2002 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of School of Pharmacy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2012 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH School of Pharmacy This dissertation was presented by Jie Gao It was defended on January 18, 2012 and approved by Billy W. Day, Professor, Pharmaceutical Sciences Donald B. DeFranco, Professor, Pharmacology & Chemical Biology Samuel M. Poloyac, Associate Professor, Pharmaceutical Sciences Song Li, Associate Professor, Pharmaceutical Sciences Dissertation Advisor: Wen Xie, Professor, Pharmaceutical Sciences ii Copyright © by Jie Gao 2012 iii THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIVE ANDROSTANE RECEPTOR AND ESTROGEN SULFOTRANSFERASE IN ENERGY HOMEOSTASIS Jie Gao, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2012 Obesity and type 2 diabetes are related metabolic disorders of high prevalence. The constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) was initially characterized as a xenobiotic receptor regulating the responses of mammals to xenotoxicants. In this study, I have uncovered an unexpected role of CAR in preventing obesity and alleviating type 2 diabetes. Activation of CAR prevented obesity and improved insulin sensitivity in both the HFD-induced type 2 diabetic model and the ob/ob mice. In contrast, CAR null mice maintained on a chow diet showed spontaneous insulin insensitivity. The metabolic benefits of CAR activation may have resulted from inhibition of hepatic lipogenesis and gluconeogenesis. The molecular mechanism through which CAR activation suppressed hepatic gluconeogenesis might be mediated via peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor gamma coactivator-1 alpha (PGC-1α).
    [Show full text]
  • Irf1) Signaling Regulates Apoptosis and Autophagy to Determine Endocrine Responsiveness and Cell Fate in Human Breast Cancer
    INTERFERON REGULATORY FACTOR-1 (IRF1) SIGNALING REGULATES APOPTOSIS AND AUTOPHAGY TO DETERMINE ENDOCRINE RESPONSIVENESS AND CELL FATE IN HUMAN BREAST CANCER A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physiology & Biophysics By Jessica L. Roberts, B.S. Washington, DC September 27, 2013 Copyright 2013 by Jessica L. Roberts All Rights Reserved ii INTERFERON REGULATORY FACTOR-1 (IRF1) SIGNALING REGULATES APOPTOSIS AND AUTOPHAGY TO DETERMINE ENDOCRINE RESPONSIVENESS AND CELL FATE IN HUMAN BREAST CANCER Jessica L. Roberts, B.S. Thesis Advisor: Robert Clarke, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Interferon regulatory factor-1 (IRF1) is a nuclear transcription factor and pivotal regulator of cell fate in cancer cells. While IRF1 is known to possess tumor suppressive activities, the role of IRF1 in mediating apoptosis and autophagy in breast cancer is largely unknown. Here, we show that IRF1 inhibits antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) protein expression, whose overexpression often contributes to antiestrogen resistance. We proposed that directly targeting the antiapoptotic BCL2 members with GX15-070 (GX; obatoclax), a BH3-mimetic currently in clinical development, would be an attractive strategy to overcome antiestrogen resistance in some breast cancers. Inhibition of BCL2 activity, through treatment with GX, was more effective in reducing the cell density of antiestrogen resistant breast cancer cells versus sensitive cells, and this increased sensitivity correlated with an accumulation of autophagic vacuoles. While GX treatment promoted autophagic vacuole and autolysosome formation, p62/SQSTM1, a marker for autophagic degradation, levels accumulated.
    [Show full text]