Urtec.Org/2020

Home , Eagle Ford Group

The integrated event for unconventional resource teams

20–22 JULY 2020 | AUSTIN CONVENTION CENTER AND ONLINE Join Us Onsite or Connect Online for a Global Digital Experience

2020 CONFERENCE ANNOUNCEMENT

SPONSORS (AS OF 6 MAY)

DIAMOND

Conference Program Book, Exhibit Hall Technical Sessions

EMERALD

Registration

RUBY

Directional Signage, Exhibit Hall Technical Sessions Attendee Bags

SAPPHIRE

Technical Program Speaker Support Lanyards

TOPAZ

General Fund Opening Reception Bar General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund

MEDIA/SUPPORTING EXPLORER

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Neuralog is the worldwide leader in well log scanning, printing, and REGISTER AND TRAVEL Registration Information ...... 11 Staying in Austin ...... 12 digitizing for the petroleum industry. Travel and Transportation ...... 13

CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHTS Monday ...... 17–18 Opening Plenary Session ...... 17 Topical Luncheons ...... 17 Panel Sessions ...... 17–18 Tuesday ...... 20–21 Log Data Capture Topical Breakfasts ...... 20 Topical Luncheons ...... 20 Special Sessions ...... 20. Panel Sessions ...... 21 Map Data Capture Wednesday ...... 22–23 Topical Breakfasts ...... 22 Topical Luncheons ...... 22 Scanning & Printing Panel Sessions ...... 22–23 Networking Opportunities ...... 23 Short Courses ...... 24 E&P Project Field Trip ...... 25 Awards ...... 25 Management

TECHNICAL PROGRAM Technical Sessions at a Glance ...... 28–29 Volumetrics & Reserves Technical Program Monday ...... 30–34 Technical Program Tuesday ...... 35–42 Technical Program Wednesday ...... 44–47 Code of Conduct ...... 48 Geological Interpretation EXHIBITION Exhibition Highlights ...... 51 Exhibitors ...... 52 Exhibition Floor Plan ...... 54 Neuralog offers practical, intuitive solutions U-Pitch Technology Showcase ...... 56 to work with legacy and modern well log data. From data capture, preparation, and

SPONSORING ORGANIZATIONS: evaluation to management and delivery, Neuralog increases your personal and organizational productivity.

Neuralog solutions are used in more than 70 countries by geoscientists, engineers, ENDORSING ORGANIZATIONS: and others working in E&P, IT, and service industries. Since 1991, independent geologists and major corporations have been relying on Neuralog’s products and neuralog.com services to get the job done.

4 Neuralog is the worldwide leader in well log scanning, printing, and digitizing for the petroleum industry.

Log Data Capture

Map Data Capture

Scanning & Printing

E&P Project Management

Volumetrics & Reserves

Geological Interpretation

Neuralog offers practical, intuitive solutions to work with legacy and modern well log data. From data capture, preparation, and evaluation to management and delivery, Neuralog increases your personal and organizational productivity.

Neuralog solutions are used in more than 70 countries by geoscientists, engineers, and others working in E&P, IT, and service industries. Since 1991, independent geologists and major corporations have been relying on Neuralog’s products and neuralog.com services to get the job done. YOU’RE INVITED – LETTER FROM THE CHAIRS

Dear Colleagues,

That we’re leading with concerns about an ongoing pandemic and perhaps the most difficult times in our industry’s history is disheartening . Our thoughts are with you, your families and our friends who have been impacted, either directly or indirectly, by these circumstances .

We don’t know what a ‘new normal’ will look like or how the energy business will change in the coming months . What we can say is that business and social connectivity is particularly important during difficult times and that we expect URTeC to remain valuable to you and your business . Even in these uncertain times, URTeC is the best opportunity you’ll have to exchange information, formulate strategic ideas and solve problems to manage and optimize your unconventional resource plays .

Whether you’re able to participate onsite in Austin or online, it is our distinct pleasure to welcome and thank you on behalf of the URTeC Sponsoring and Endorsing Organizations and our Technical Program Committee . This effort began with a record number of 928 abstracts being submitted . As a result, featured are more than 400 technical papers focused on collaboration and integration between the subsurface G&G disciplines, geomechanics, formation evaluation, wellhead design, completion design, enhanced recovery, and production forecasting . URTeC is a forum where pros engaged in all aspects of the E&P lifecycle come together to innovate, integrate and advance understanding to create value . In addition to the many technical sessions, other significant events are also planned such as:

• The Opening Plenary Session where leaders of our industry will discuss current affairs and impact on our energy future; • The Operators’ Forum where operating companies will present solutions to challenging issues; • Special Sessions from ARMA (American Rock Mechanics Association) addressing geomechanics in modern completions and well construction and the SPWLA (Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts) session highlighting the latest in unconventional petrophysics; • Panel discussions addressing emerging technology, artificial intelligence, sustainable development, induced seismicity, well integrity, and what can make shale plays successful .

The exhibition is backed by more than 150 companies with the latest in technology to help you safely produce more for less with an eye to environmental stewardship . The Exhibit Hall Technical Sessions and the U-Pitch Technology Showcase will also be continued as appropriate .

Despite the seemingly overwhelming challenges, we are all committed to continue advancing the technology that has unlocked the exploitation of these important resources over the last decade . We will persevere and overcome these new challenges with the contributions that will be shared at URTeC this year . The technologies developed today to explore and exploit unconventional resources will continue to define the hydrocarbon extraction industry of tomorrow.

Please stay safe and we hope you enjoy the conference – whether onsite or online .

Sincerely, Technical Program Co-Chairs

Jay Stratton (SPE) Stephanie Perry (AAPG) Scott Singleton (SEG) Co-Chair Co-Chair Co-Chair Ultra Petroleum GeoMark Research Ltd. Independence Resources Management 6

TECHNICAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE

TECHNICAL PROGRAM CO-CHAIRS

Jay Stratton, SPE Co-Chair, Ultra Petroleum Stephanie Perry, AAPG Co-Chair, GeoMark Research Ltd. Scott Singleton, SEG Co-Chair, Independence Resources Management

THEME CHAIRS

Robert Hull, Pioneer Natural Resources, Theme 1: Operators’ Forum Craig Cipolla, Hess Corporation, Theme 1: Operators’ Forum Johannes Alvarez, Chevron, Theme 1: Operators’ Forum Katerina Yared, SM Energy, Theme 2: Advanced Formation Evaluation of Unconventional Reservoirs Stephen Sonnenberg, Colorado School of Mines, Theme 3: Integrating Geology and Geophysics to Optimize Development TRANSFORMING Andrew Munoz, Newfield Exploration, Theme 3: Integrating Geology and Geophysics to Optimize Development Matthew Poole, Shell Exploration and Production Company, Theme 3: Integrating Geology and Geophysics to Optimize Development Ahmad Ghassemi, University of Oklahoma, Theme 4: Geomechanics – The Intersection of Geoscience and Engineering Gang Han, Aramco Services Company, Theme 4: Geomechanics – The Intersection of Geoscience and Engineering THE TRADITIONAL Robert Hurt, Pioneer Natural Resources, Theme 4: Geomechanics – The Intersection of Geoscience and Engineering Eric Michael, ConocoPhillips, Theme 5: Applied Geochemistry for Unconventionals: From Source Rock to Produced Hydrocarbons John Curtis, GeoMark Research Ltd., Theme 5: Applied Geochemistry for Unconventionals: From Source Rock to Produced Hydrocarbons Birol Dindoruk, Shell International Exploration and Production, Theme 6: Machine Learning, AI, and Big Data in the Digital Oilfield Benin Chelinsky Jeyachandra, Nesh, Theme 6: Machine Learning, AI, and Big Data in the Digital Oilfield Autumn Shannon, Marathon Oil, Theme 7: Enhanced Recovery: Unlocking the Production Potential of Unconventionals George Koperna, Advanced Resources International, Inc., Theme 7: Enhanced Recovery: Unlocking the Production Potential of Unconventionals Perform Workflows Mohan Manohar, Noble Energy, Theme 7: Enhanced Recovery: Unlocking the Production Potential of Unconventionals Susan Howes, Subsurface Consultants & Associates, LLC, Theme 8: Reserves Estimation and Production Forecasting Alexsandra Martinez, DeGolyer and MacNaughton, Theme 8: Reserves Estimation and Production Forecasting in Seconds David Hume, Independent Consultant, Theme 9: New Materials, Innovative Technologies as Applied to Unconventionals John Lassek, Encana, Theme 9: New Materials, Innovative Technologies as Applied to Unconventionals Bin Yuan, University of Calgary, Theme 10: International and Emerging Challenges of Unconventional Resources: Integrated Geoscience and Engineering What will your team do with more time, Ali Sloan, Parsley Energy, Theme 10: International and Emerging Challenges of Unconventional Resources: Integrated Geoscience and Engineering Luis Baez, Shell Exploration and Production Company, Theme 11: Business of Unconventional Plays: Volume, Value, and Sustainability increased collaboration, and actionable Doug Valleau, Strategia Innovation and Technology Advisors, Theme 11: Business of Unconventional Plays: Volume, Value, and Sustainability Steven Carpenter, University of Wyoming, Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute, Theme 12: Sustainability, Rapid Industry Change, and the Social License to Operate insights delivered in seconds? Sallie Greenberg, University of Illinois, Theme 12: Sustainability, Rapid Industry Change, and the Social License to Operate Enverus and RS Energy Group join forces to SUBCOMMITTEE CHAIRS empower high-value decisions and transform

Skip Rhodes, Pioneer Natural Resources, Plenary Session the traditional way of doing business. Doug Valleau, Strategia Innovation and Technology Advisors, Plenary Session Alejandro Lerza, Chevron, Panels and Invited Sessions Isaac Aviles, Schlumberger, Panels and Invited Sessions Learn how we can power your business Baosheng Liang, Chevron, Topicals Rick Walker, URTeC Events APP at Booths #523 & #1022. Alexsandra Martinez, DeGolyer and MacNaughton, URTeC Events APP Rex Griffin, Ultra Petroleum, URTeC Events APP Drillinginfo 8 TRANSFORMING THE TRADITIONAL

Perform Workflows in Seconds

What will your team do with more time, increased collaboration, and actionable insights delivered in seconds? Enverus and RS Energy Group join forces to empower high-value decisions and transform the traditional way of doing business.

Learn how we can power your business at Booths #523 & #1022.

Drillinginfo REGISTER AND TRAVEL

• Registration Information • Staying in Austin • Travel and Transportation

10 REGISTRATION INFORMATION

Connect and Learn Onsite or Online. Register Now and Save Register Online at URTeC.org/2020 On-Site Registration Information Advance online registration is recommended . Registering for the full, live Located in Exhibit Hall 1 of the Austin Convention Center conference on or before the early bird deadline gets you on-site access, plus Saturday, 18 July ...... 10:00a–6:00p full digital access to the content, and a $100 savings. Registering online Sunday, 19 July ...... 8:00a–6:00p . allows you to know immediately which events are available . If any are not Monday, 20 July ...... 6:30a–5:30p available, they will appear on the screen as “sold out ”. Tuesday, 21 July ...... 6:30a–5:30p Telephone Wednesday, 22 July ...... 6:30a–12:00p Contact the URTeC Registration Center at +1 781 688 8000 (Monday–Friday, 8:00a–5:00p EST) to register by telephone.

Registration Type On or before 30 June Midnight EST After 30 June Midnight EST Member* $650 $750 Three-Day Nonmember $750 $850 Conference & Exhibition: Student Member* $75 ONSITE AND ONLINE Student Nonmember $100 Includes: Access to the Opening Plenary, all panel sessions, all technical sessions, exhibition, U-Pitch presentations, refreshment breaks, receptions, as well as access to the on-demand digital presentations. *Access to digital content will be available through 31 December 2020. Member* $350 $450 Nonmember $425 $525 Student Member* $75 Three-Day Conference: ONLINE ONLY Student Nonmember $100 Includes: Online access to technical sessions, all digital conference proceedings, and online exhibits where available. You can upgrade at anytime to the ONSITE & ONLINE option for only $300 more. *Access to digital content will be available through 31 December 2020. One-Day Member* $325 $425 One-Day Nonmember $425 $525 One-Day Conference & Exhibition: Registration Day: Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday ONSITE ONLY Includes: Access to specific day’s events including panel sessions, technical sessions, exhibition, U-Pitch presentations, refreshment breaks, reception, as well as access to the digital conference proceedings. Please plan to pick up your badge on the day for which you registered. One-Day Member* $75 One-Day Nonmember $75 One-Day Exhibition: ONSITE ONLY Registration Day: Monday, Tuesday, or Wednesday Includes: Access to a specific day’s exhibit hall technical sessions, exhibition, U-Pitch presentations, refreshment breaks, and reception. Please plan to pick up your badge on the day for which you registered.

Non-Conference Registrants include those who register for short courses and/or field trip only. No access to the Onsite or Online Conference. A $30 processing fee will be applied upon registration in addition to the cost of the short courses and/or field trip. Should you wish to upgrade to the Onsite or Online conference, the $30 fee will be applied as a credit.

Member rates apply to members of the following societies: * AAPG (American Association of Petroleum Geologists), AIChE (American Institute of Chemical Engineers), AIST (Association for Iron & Steel Technology), ARMA (American Rock Mechanics Association), ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers), ASME (The American Society of Mechanical Engineers), SEG (Society of Exploration Geophysicists), SME (Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration), SPE (Society of Petroleum Engineers), SPEE (Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers), and SPWLA (Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts)

Cancellation Policy • Cancellations can be made by contacting URTeC Registration on or before 30 June via email at urtecregistration@thepulsenetwork com. . • Cancellations received on or before 30 June will receive a refund LESS a $75 processing fee. • Refunds will not be issued after 30 June or for “no shows ”. • You may substitute one participant for another . • Refunds for the field trip and/or short courses can be made until 30 June. No refunds for the field trip and/or short courses can be made after this date. • If the ONSITE in-person URTeC conference is cancelled, all ONSITE registrants will be given credit towards the full ONLINE/digital event program, and will be refunded the remaining difference .

11 STAYING IN AUSTIN

Please book your rooms through the URTeC Housing Bureau, Experient . This helps URTeC meet hotel room block commitments and avoid penalties that could ultimately increase conference expenses . New hotel reservations must be reserved with the Housing Bureau by 26 June.

Single/ Walking Distance to In-Room Parking* Hotel Address Double Convention Center Dining (Daily) Guest Room Internet

Self – $37.00 Across the street from plus tax Hilton Austin 500 East 4th Street $234 Yes Free Convention Center Valet – $46.00 plus tax

Courtyard Across the street from Austin Downtown 300 East 4th Street $199 Yes Self – $49 Free Convention Center Convention Center

Connected via Skybridge – $13.95 per day or Free if enrolled Fairmont Austin 101 Red River Street $235 Yes Self – $36.00 the Red River Canopy Walk in Accor Live Limitless

Self – $49.00 JW Marriot Austin 110 East 2nd Street $229 .3 miles Yes Free Valet – $54.00

The hotels are smoke free and include restaurants on the property, a lounge, pool and fitness center, business center, complimentary Wi-Fi in public areas, and available guest room internet. Hotel rates do not include taxes. Information listed above is subject to change at hotel’s discretion. *Parking rates are subject to change and subject to hotel specifications.

Book Online at URTeC.org/2020 Online booking of accommodations allows you to immediately know the availability of your required nights . Additional accommodation details and policies are also found on URTeC org. . To receive the URTeC rate, all hotel reservations must be made through the Housing Bureau, Experient . For help with this site, you may call Customer Service toll free at +1 800 967 8852 or international registrants may call +1 847 996 5832 . Deposits All reservations require a credit card guarantee . Hotel requires cancellation notice of 72 hours prior to the reservation date to avoid cancellation penalty. Failure to arrive on your confirmed arrival date will result in one night’s room & tax charged by the hotel to the credit card provided and your entire reservation will be cancelled . Hotel may also add an early departure fee should you check out prior to your scheduled departure date . Changes/Cancellations Reservation changes and cancellations can be made via the website or via email on or before 26 June. After 26 June, reservation changes or cancellations must be made directly with the hotel . NOTE: The hotel will not have record of your room reservation until 29 June. If you need to make changes or cancel your reservation with the hotel, please do not call the hotel before 30 June.

12 TRAVEL AND TRANSPORTATION

Convention Center Information Driving Directions Austin Convention Center Traveling from Dallas, San Antonio, Houston, Corpus Christi, El Paso or the Address: 500 E. Cesar Chavez St. Austin, TX 78701 Austin-Bergstrom International Airport? Complete driving directions from Phone: +1 512 404 4000 these locations can be found online at URTeC org. . Website: www.austinconventioncenter.com

Airport Information Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (AUS) Address: 3600 Presidential Blvd. Austin, TX 78719 Phone: +1 512 530 2242 Website: www.austintexas.gov/airport/

Ground Transportation Austin-Bergstrom International Airport is located in Southeast Austin approximately eight miles or 20 minutes from the downtown area . Ground transportation is located on the lower level curbside outside of baggage claim .

Taxis Taxicabs are available on the lower level curbside outside of baggage claim . Minimum fare for taxi customers is $13.10, this includes a $1.00 airport surcharge . All taxis have a four passenger maximum, excluding children 12-years and under . All taxis accept major credit cards . • Austin Cab: +1 512 478 2222 • Lone Star Cab: +1 512 836 4900 • Yellow Cab: +1 512 452 9999

Metrorail Capital Metro’s MetroRail stops right next to the Austin Convention Center . Alleviate the pressures of traffic, and leave your car behind. The MetroRail will take you to our venue in a smooth, timely manner . Just sit back and enjoy the ride .

Rental Car Rental car services are available at the Austin-Bergstrom International Airport . The rental car facility is located north across from baggage claim . Use one of the pedestrian bridges or crosswalks and follow the signs to the rental car facility . • Level 1: Hertz, Dollar, Thrifty • Level 2: National, Alamo, Enterprise, Fox • Level 3: Avis, Budget, Advantage, Payless A complete list of providers can be found online, www .austintexas gov. / department/ground-transportation .

Rideshare Companies A number of ride-hailing companies operate out of the Austin area and are allowed for airport pick-up . Two popular services, Uber and Lyft, however are deadlocked and do not operate within Austin city limits. Visit the Austin-Bergstrom International Airport website to view a full list of ride-hailing providers .

Public Transportation CapMetro is Austin’s public Transportation agency offering service throughout the city . Whether you’re traveling across town, or neighborhood- to-neighborhood, CapMetro makes it easy for you to view schedules, prices and plan your trip accordingly. Single day fare passes range from $2–$7 depending on which service you choose . For more details, visit www cap. metro org. .

13 CONFERENCE AT A GLANCE (SCHEDULE AND TALKS SUBJECT TO CHANGE)

SATURDAY, 18 JULY

8:00a–5:00p Short Course 1 (Day 1): DFIT – The Unconventional Well Test: Theory, Design, and Interpretation (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 2 (Day 1): Unconventional Reservoir Production (Rate-Transient) Analysis (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 3 (Day 1): Gas EOR in Tight Unconventionals (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 4 (Day 1): Reservoir Engineering Applications of Advanced Data Analytics and Machine Learning Algorithms (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 5 (Day 1): Forecasting Well Production Data in Unconventional Resources (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 6 (Day 1): Essentials of Unconventional Play Based Exploration (AAPG) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 7 (Day 1): Design and Surveillance of Wastewater Disposal Wells for Unconventional Resource Development (AAPG) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 8 (Day 1): Seismic Anisotropy: Basic Theory and Applications in Exploration and Reservoir Characterization (SEG) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 9 (Day 1): Carbonate Essentials: Pores to Prospect (SEG) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 10 (Day 1): Integrated Geologic, Seismic, Geomechanics, and Reservoir Engineering Characterization and Flow Simulation in Fractured Reservoirs (SEG) 10:00a–6:00p Registration

SUNDAY, 19 JULY

7:30a–5:00p Field Trip: From Slope to Basin – A Core Workshop Focusing on the Variety of Gravity Flow Deposits throughout the Permian Basins (AAPG) 8:00a–6:00p Registration 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 1 (Day 2): DFIT – The Unconventional Well Test: Theory, Design, and Interpretation (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 2 (Day 2): Unconventional Reservoir Production (Rate-Transient) Analysis (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 3 (Day 2): Gas EOR in Tight Unconventionals (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 4 (Day 2): Reservoir Engineering Applications of Advanced Data Analytics and Machine Learning Algorithms (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 5 (Day 2): Forecasting Well Production Data in Unconventional Resources (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 6 (Day 2): Essentials of Unconventional Play Based Exploration (AAPG) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 7 (Day 2): Design and Surveillance of Wastewater Disposal Wells for Unconventional Resource Development (AAPG) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 8 (Day 2): Seismic Anisotropy: Basic Theory and Applications in Exploration and Reservoir Characterization (SEG) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 9 (Day 2): Carbonate Essentials: Pores to Prospect (SEG) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 10 (Day 2): Integrated Geologic, Seismic, Geomechanics, and Reservoir Engineering Characterization and Flow Simulation in Fractured Reservoirs (SEG) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 11: An Overview of Multistage Comletion Systems for Hydraulic Fracturing (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 12: Critical Geomechanics Concepts and Applications to Unconventionals Completions (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 13: Methane Emission Measurement and Mitigation (MEMM) (SPE) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 14: Geomechanics of Reservoir Stimulation by Hydraulic Fracturing (AAPG) 8:00a–5:00p Short Course 15: Applied Petroleum Geochemistry (AAPG)

MONDAY, 20 JULY

6:30a–5:30p Registration 8:30a–10:00a Ope ning Plenary Session: Unconventionals 2020: Restructured Global Finance and Geopolitics Merge with a Focus on Environmental, Social, and Governance Issues 10:00a–7:00p Exhibition 10:00a–11:00a Refreshment Break 10:45a–12:05p Technical Sessions – Exhibit Hall 10:45a–12:05p Technical Sessions – Session Rooms 12:05p–1:15p Topical Luncheon: Private Equity in International Unconventional Assets 12:05p–1:15p Topical Luncheon: Application of PVT and Petroleum Geochemical Analyses to Enhanced Oil Recovery in Resource Plays 1:45p–5:35p Technical Sessions – Session Rooms 1:45p–5:10p Technical Sessions – Exhibit Hall 3:00p–4:00p Refreshment Break 5:00p–7:00p Opening Reception

14 CONFERENCE AT A GLANCE (SCHEDULE AND TALKS SUBJECT TO CHANGE)

TUESDAY, 21 JULY

6:30a–5:30p Registration 7:00a–8:15a Topical Breakfast: Inspiring Decisions at the Speed of Thought 7:00a–8:15a Topical Breakfast: Are We Effectively Draining from the SRV? 7:00a–8:15a Top ical Breakfast: Less Could be More! Water Saturation in Liquid-Rich Unconventional Reservoirs: Implications for Well Spacing and Profitability 8:25a–12:20p Technical Sessions – Session Rooms 9:10a–12:20p Technical Sessions – Exhibit Hall 9:00a–6:00p Exhibition 10:00a–11:00a Refreshment Break 12:05p–1:15p Topical Luncheon: State of Unconventionals – Geoscience and Engineering Aspects 12:05p–1:15p Topical Luncheon: Anadarko “Super” Basin: Eight Key Characteristics to Understand Productivity 12:05p–1:15p Topical Luncheon: Market Dynamics and Key Price Drivers in 2020 and Beyond 1:45p–5:10p Technical Sessions – Session Rooms 1:45p–5:35p Technical Sessions – Exhibit Hall 3:00p–4:00p Refreshment Break 5:00p–6:00p Networking Reception

WEDNESDAY, 22 JULY

6:30a–12:00p Registration 7:00a–8:15a Top ical Breakfast: The Cooperative Interface Between Formation Evaluation and Geomechanics for Quantifying the Production Potential of Organic Shales 7:00a–8:15a Topical Breakfast: The Rise and Fall of Microseismic Frac Monitoring 8:25a–12:20p Technical Sessions – Session Rooms 9:10a–12:20p Technical Sessions – Exhibit Hall 9:00a–1:00p Exhibition 10:00a–11:00a Refreshment Break 12:05p–1:15p Topical Luncheon: Unlocking Value in the Powder River Basin 12:05p–1:15p Topical Luncheon: Advanced Characterization of Source Rock Core Samples – An Integrated Digital and Physical Workflow 12:05p–1:15p Topical Luncheon: Oilfield Services: Lessons Learned from Past Decade and Survival Strategies in the New Decade 1:45p–3:30p Technical Sessions – Session Rooms

Purchase your Topical Breakfast and Luncheon tickets during registration. Tickets are limited and required for admission.

15 CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHTS

• Monday • Tuesday • Wednesday • Networking Opportunities • Best of URTeC 2019 Awards • Short Courses • Field Trip

16 MONDAY CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHTS

Opening Plenary Session Monday Luncheons Unconventionals 2020: Restructured Global Finance and Fee: $60 per person Geopolitics Merge with a Focus on Environmental, Social, and Governance Issues Location: Austin Convention Center Private Equity in International Unconventional Assets Fee: Included with registration Ashley Zumwalt-Forbes, President, Black Mountain Moderators: Skip Rhodes and Doug Valleau At current domestic acreage prices and economics, early movers Production from U .S . based conventional plays has altered the global hydrocarbon are looking beyond the U .S . border for emerging unconventional marketplace and shifted the strategic geopolitical impact of oil supply and opportunities . demand . The U .S ., once a net importer, is now a net exporter of oil with production exceeding 12 9. MMBoe per day . This level of domestic production insulates the U .S . from many global supply disruptions . Similarly, advances in exploration, drilling, completions, and production are now exported helping to further advance the global energy landscape . Shale 1 0. established unconventional resources as Application of PVT and Petroleum Geochemical Analyses a commercial venture and utilized a drill-to-hold strategy resulted in significant to Enhanced Oil Recovery in Resource Plays acreage position by many companies . Shale 2 0. gave us pad-development, and lean manufacturing yielding significant volumes of hydrocarbons at acceptable Dr. Kevin A. Ferworn, Vice President and costs from both operators and the service sector . Dr. John B. Curtis, Rocky Mountain Manager, GeoMark Research, Ltd . The year 2020 brings with it another step change for our industry . Shale 3 0. opened with a renewed corporate attention to delivering value and free-cash Oil extraction techniques are estimated to recover flow from operations as a strategic driver. That focus rapidly morphed into a just 5–7% of in-place oil using today’s technology . shareholder expectation for substantive returns at levels not previously shared In response, a number of Enhanced Oil Recovery by the fossil energy sector . Shale 3 0. recognizes that the Tier 1 resources (EOR) techniques are being considered to boost this percentage and improve that brought on the shale revolution now must be managed as late-life field ultimate recoveries . One of the most promising techniques is “Huff and Puff” cyclic optimizations. Such optimization demands a level of data fidelity, analytic gas injection . wisdom, and innovation not previously commonplace in our industry . Capital In the Huff & Puff technique, separator gas from a nearby well or gas installation efficiency accompanied by free cash flow has become a highly embraced goal for is injected (the Huff phase) into a depleted or partially depleted oil well, ideally at everyone regardless if the “shop floor” is in the field or at main office. Following a high enough pressure to achieve miscibility . During the following soak period the on from free-cash flow, the expectation of shareholder return has replaced the miscible gas spreads through the formation, swelling the oil volume and decreasing previous tendency to chase production volumes and reserve additions . its viscosity . After the soaking period, the well is put back on production (the Puff A broadly-based shareholder movement together with the energy transition phase) with an expected increase in production rate due to the higher reservoir community reminded the industry that we must do more to mitigate the harmful pressure and lower oil viscosity . The separated gas can then be sold or reinjected aspects of our environmental footprint . Now, more broadly bundled into a matrix into another well to initiate a new Huff and Puff sequence . This process can be of obligations and challenges, Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) repeated as long as commercial quantities of liquids are extracted from each Huff topics have matched the importance of late-life field optimization, parent-child and Puff cycle . enigmas and the multi-disciplinary puzzle of capital efficiency. Compounding Because of the regional consistency of fluid properties in many shale plays, it that challenge is awareness that global economies are slowing, and demand is possible to predict regional trends in phase behavior once a calibration is is softening yielding both uncertainty and depressed commodity pricing . The established. We accomplish this by developing a database of PVT and geochemical challenges for 2020 require that we pay more than passive attention to issues measurements and mapping these trends across the plays . This illustrated work like flaring; water use and disposal; methane and volatile organic compounds serves as a guideline for the selection and analysis of gas and oil samples and emissions; carbon capture; clean fuel advancement . Our plenary panel of assists in the application of the results in a regional framework . speakers has been asked to share their insights on one or more of the issues that Analytical objectives are focused on miscibility testing – both “first-contact” through exist for Shale 3 0. and perhaps how technology and social responsibility can be swelling tests and “multi-contact” via slim tube studies . Representative recombined scaled into a sustainable business case by the close of 2020 . reservoir fluids and corresponding injection gases are collected from the field, or prepared in the laboratory, and run through an established laboratory program . Fluid compositions, densities, and viscosities are measured frequently and used in reservoir MONDAY MORNING PANEL simulation models to evaluate the effectiveness of the Huff and Puff process . New Technologies Funding and Commercialization A brief profile of methods of funding, supporting, and commercializing new technologies . Which ones are being invested in, and why? With the “double black swan” events of 2020 (global pandemic, plus price collapse), priorities have shifted away from projects that will have long-term payouts, to those that will result in more short-term cost savings as well as revenue flows. Sometimes this means pivoting in ways that were never envisioned before, such as repurposing equipment for oil storage . In other situations, it means looking at one’s capabilities and finding out what investment might be needed to pivot into a different industry . For example, investment might be made to repurpose equipment and capabilities to help the production of disinfectants and transportation for industries such as health and food supply chain, where it is urgently needed . Our panelists discuss investment in the new Double Black Swan world, and they share their experience and successes .

17 MONDAY CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHTS

MONDAY AFTERNOON PANELS

Technology Adoption: Experiences from the Field How to foster and nurse new ideas for highest impact . What’s the best way to try out a new technology or a technique in the field? What are some lessons learned? What kinds of technologies have the most “quick-impact”? Some of the high-impact technologies in 2019 no longer have the same economic punch . At the same time, some of the overlooked or low-impact technologies now are extremely useful, even transformative . For example, some of the smart operations that were used for monitoring geosteering and also completions can be used to plan the completions of wells in the future . In addition, with the new price environment, technologies that can result in cost reductions and well performance improvements have become more important than ever, particularly when they are coupled with geological and geochemical data which can result in a significant positive impact. As we discuss positive impact, we must also take a look at the potential negative impacts, and identify the techniques, work flows, and technologies that worked in the past that may have disastrous outcomes now .

Data Analytics and Physics Informed Model: The Largest and Greatest During the last years a debate has existed between the predicatibility capabilities of machine learning models versus the correct physics representations into them . Physics informed models seem to have adopted the best of both worlds and this panel intends to describe these kind of models, its benefits, typical pitfalls and latest experiences . Domain experts are more important than ever as machine learning algorithms are being pushed to the limit, particularly to model uncertainty and for risk assessment . Decisions can be made on the basis of a predictive model (deep learning), but those decisions can be deeply flawed if the data has not been thoroughly cleaned and the algorithms do not account for the science (physics, rock properties, fluid properties). We will discuss the key considerations in today’s decision-making environment, particularly in a situation where there is likely to be large-scale changes in ownership, and the new operators of fields will be under pressure to develop data-driven models that are both reliable and quickly modified. Tactics for managing and cleaning data will be addressed, as well as identifying key pitfalls in developing the algorithms, and deciding which algorithms to employ .

TUESDAY CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHTS

Tuesday Breakfasts TUESDAY MORNING PANELS Fee: $40 per person Hydraulic Fracturing and Its Effects on Well Integrity Less Could be More! Water Saturation in Liquid-rich The second install at URTeC (plus session at HFTC) . This continues to be a hot Unconventional Reservoirs: Implications for Well Spacing topic . We could go beyond hydraulic fracturing into reservoir and geological effects and Profitability With more years of experience operating in a harsh economic environment, where Andrew Pepper, Director, Petroleum Systems LLC there has been pressure to do more with less, the risk of compromised well integrity New and independent methods of saturation measurement during hydraulic fracturing is always a concern . We will discuss how completion are showing that water saturations in these reservoirs are designs are impacted by sudden and dramatic cuts in CAPEX, and when there are significantly higher than measured by the methods employed over mass layoffs, furloughs, and an exodus of experienced geoscientists and engineers . the last decade . We will take a close look at the persistent and pervasive problems that occur in virtually all laterals, and discuss the traditional approaches to them, and discuss Given that recoverable reserves are defined by decline curve analysis, lower in- how things have changed in the compressed, price-constrained environment, and place volumes mean that recovery factors – previously estimated as low as 3-5% where there have been surprising breakthroughs and innovative approaches to – are significantly higher than previously thought. Arguably, the down spacing maintaining well integrity during hydraulic fracturing . in many plays is being driven by this false perception of high oil in place and low primary recovery factors . Daughter wells generally perform poorly compared to Hydraulic Fracture Test Site the parent wells, and there is evidence from reservoir simulation that the parent With more tests and evaluations on the cores recovered from the HFTS1 and the wells will access the reserves anyway . HFTS2, more insights have been gained about the nature of hydraulic fracturing and So, we may be drilling infills for rate; not recovery. Could less infill drilling and their limits . To provide a bit of background, it is useful to recall that the Hydraulic lower up-front capex be the key to more profitability? Fracturing Test Sites (HFTS) are field-based research experiments conducted in the West Texas Midland and Delaware basins, bringing together government and industry to improve recovery, continue enhancing environmentally responsible Inspiring Decisions at the Speed of Thought methods of optimizing production, and lowering costs in the Midland and Delaware Jonathan Garrett, Managing Director, RS Energy Group (Now Part Basins . Experiments at both the Midland HFTS1 and Delaware HFTS2 involve drilling, hydraulically fracturing, and monitoring multiple horizontals wells operated of Enverus) by host companies Laredo Petroleum and Oxy, respectively . Coring a slant well RS Energy Group (Now Part of Enverus) will reveal an exclusive through the stimulated rock volume is part of both projects . Approximately 600 feet glimpse into the power of predictive analytics and how you can of core were successfully recovered in HFTS1; slant coring at HFTS2 is scheduled answer the “what if” questions ahead of any planning, drilling for Q3/Q4 of 2019. The value of each project is roughly $25 million. activity, or acquisition . RSEG managing director, Jonathan We will discuss how HFTS1 and HFTS2 cores were collected . We will discuss Garrett, will explore powerful workflows built from dynamic data science and the issues through the integration of geological, geochemical, geophysical, predictive models, allowing the industry to analyze critical variables to predict geomechanical, petrophysical, drilling, and completions data with a multi-well outcomes, optimize value, and identify opportunity . instrumentation and time-lapse geochemistry program . What did the results yield? What can we now say about how the core-driven information may advance hydraulic fracturing technology, optimize well spacing, and mitigate environmental impacts Are We Effectively Draining from the SRV? of shale development operations . Using the results, it may be possible to improve Faye Liu, Founder and CEO, RevoChem LLC design and execution of fracture stages will also reduce the number of future infill wells drilled and reduce water volume and energy input. The ultimate goal for In the past decade, the industry has made tremendous efforts in producers is an understanding of how to optimize parameters to meet individual the understanding and unraveling of the Stimulated Rock Volume internal performance metrics . (SRV) generated by hydraulic fracturing application. However, questions still remain regarding the bottom-line uncertainties as to where the hydrocarbons are physically drained or contributed Tuesday Luncheons from (i.e., DRV, Drainage Rock Volume). In addition, how does the then-defined Fee: $60 per person drainage change through the production life cycle, and are infill wells in drainage communication? Information from the thousands of naturally occurring State of Unconventionals — Geoscience and compounds in the produced oils holds the key to answer these crucial questions Engineering Aspects for the oil and gas industry . Tom Blasingame, Professor, Texas A&M University This presentation provides a “State of Unconventionals” from the perspective of geoscience and engineering technologies which have evolved and enabled the development of unconventional reservoirs . This will include discussions regarding technology and economic “triggers,” as well as timelines . The presentation will focus on current needs as well — e .g ., well spacing, well placement, fracture-directed interactions (“frac-hits”), reservoir and production engineering tools/needs, and the role of geology and reservoir fluids. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of the state of technology for unconventional reservoirs, but in a language and format suitable to both technical and non-technical audiences .

20 Anadarko “Super” Basin: Eight Key Characteristics to Market Dynamics and Key Price Drivers in 2020 and Beyond Understand Productivity Bernadette Johnson, Vice President – Strategic Analytics, Richard Fritz, AAPG President 2020-21 Enverus Twenty-five basins worldwide are identified as “Super Basins,” This presentation will address current and expected fundamental defined as a basin containing multiple reservoirs and source rocks drivers of oil and gas prices including geopolitics, U .S . production with cumulative production of at least 5 BBOE and future production growth, OPEC, growing demand, and upstream concerns including potential of more than 5 BBOE. By this definition the Anadarko spacing dynamics, LNG, and capital markets . Basin is a Super Basin as it has produced close to 50 BBOE from multiple Paleozoic reservoirs . There are at least eight unique geoscience elements that contribute to oil and gas productivity in the Anadarko Basin . The most important TUESDAY AFTERNOON PANELS are its source rocks, especially the dominant Woodford shale estimated to have generated and expelled more than 300 BBOE since Mississippian time . Second, the Sub-Surface Characterization vs. Early Facilities Design initiation of the basin along the abandoned arm of a failed rift resulted in 40,000 ft . of With budget constraining the ability to accurately predict surface facilities at an Paleozoic sediment with multiple reservoirs . Based on the burial history and lack of early stage is critical to avoid over or under design . Now that we are operating significant inversion Anadarko Basin source rocks are mostly in the mature window. under extreme conditions, new approaches to facilities designs are being Other key elements are the left-lateral, north–south basement strike-slip fault system suggested . With many surface facilities unused, stacked, or neglected, it is an that provides strong facture overprint and multiple migration pathways into good ideal time to take stock, create inventories, and use new technologies to see how local and regional seals to develop multiple trap styles . The basin has an overall many ways existing, unused and now-surplus surface facilities can be repurposed, positive paragenetic history that allows for good reservoir development, and multiple redeployed, or even scavenged and retooled for other industries . We encourage overpressured cells assist in well performance . As a result, the Anadarko Basin has a the free flow of ideas, and no idea is too outrageous for this free and open copious conventional and evolving non-conventional production history . exchange of experiences and ideas . This study encompasses the “Greater Anadarko Basin” which includes western Oklahoma, western Kansas, southeastern Colorado, and the Texas Panhandle. This area contains 46 giant oil fields defined by AAPG by a minimum of 100 MMBOE of Special Session: Synergies and Collaboration with cumulative production. This includes the Oklahoma City and Panhandle fields plus Geothermal Industry the giant Hugoton embayment complex . According to IHS, conventional cumulative With the growth of alternative sources of energy, oilfield technologies and know- production is at least ~15 MMBO and 170 TCFG . More than 50% of the total oil how can help decrease the learning curve and expedite development to address production is from Penn–Permian age rocks although as much as 24% is from the environmental and sustainability related challenges . Cambro–Ordovician . Gas production is dominated by the Permian with more than 44% of total and the Pennsylvanian Morrowan–Desmoinesian account for 24% of total . In today’s price environment for oil and gas, which exists in a time of increasing local demand for electricity, but a lack of CAPEX for the construction of large-scale The next 50 BBOE of production will most likely be with horizontal drilling and transmission lines, opportunities exist in places that may have not been considered hydraulic fracturing . The Carboniferous to Devonian sections in the Anadarko before . This panel will discuss the new constraints and opportunities for geothermal Basin contain prime reservoirs for resource plays, particularly in Hunton and discuss how to re-assess and rank both the geothermal resources themselves carbonates, Woodford Shale, Mississippian Osage chert/Meramec shale, plus and the technologies . There will also be a discussion of markets, and how to multiple Pennsylvanian clastics and carbonates . Several mature resource plays achieve economies of scale using technologies for optimization, and also with new are in the early stage of density production drilling—the Woodford Shale in SCOOP, financial instruments or arrangements with utilities. the Meramec shale in STACK proper, Pennsylvanian granite wash in front of the Wichita Uplift, and significant areas of Mississippi “lime” in northern Oklahoma. In addition, there is significant gas potential in Pennsylvanian sandstones and the Woodford Shale, especially in the deeper portions of the basin . Another item that makes a “Super Basin” is accessibility . The Anadarko Basin has proven above-ground conditions that contribute to realizing its full resource potential . One of the top conditions is excellent infrastructure with multiple pipelines, close connectivity to the Cushing oil complex, and active vendors . In addition, the states within the greater Anadarko Basin have petroleum-friendly political establishment at state, county and local levels along sensible state laws and commission rules to encourage resource development . Technological development and access is another key aspect of the Anadarko Basin . Due to a more-than 100 years of activity most of the key technological advances were tested in the basin from rotary drilling to reflection seismic.

21 WEDNESDAY CONFERENCE HIGHLIGHTS

Wednesday Breakfasts Special Session: ARMA Fee: $40 per person ARMA is the American Rock Mechanics Association . Membership includes specialization in all forms of surface and subsurface rock engineering—from tunneling to mine design to hydraulic fracturing to subsidence and compaction The Rise and Fall of Microseismic Frac Monitoring assessment . Membership is international, with members from 37 nations . Peter M. Duncan, President and Chief Executive Officer, This session provides new insights from four senior researchers and practitioners . Microseismic, Inc . The theme of the session is application of rock mechanics principles, As the shale gale grew microseismic monitoring of fracs grew measurements, and simulations to characterize, comprehend, and exploit in-situ with it . The technology was key to understanding how the mechanical properties, discontinuities, stresses, and treatment parameters . These reservoirs actually responded to pressure pumping . Completion premier practitioners offer perspectives from national laboratories, industry, efficiency, wellbore spacing decisions, and environmental safety and academia . were all illuminated by the microseismic results . Production from shale has continued to grow but the microseismic monitoring market has shrunk in part because of commodity prices but also because producers believe the value Special Session: SPWLA proposition of monitoring has diminished or even vanished . The Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts (SPWLA) is a non-profit Is microseismic monitoring a technology whose time has passed? Let’s talk . organization dedicated to the advancement of petrophysics, log and core measurements, formation evaluation techniques, and hydrocarbon, mineral, and water resources . The SPWLA is pleased to showcase a selection of top-rated unconventional The Cooperative Interface between Formation Evaluation reservoir-focused papers presented at its Annual Symposium June 2020 . The papers and Geomechanics for Quantifying the Production Potential will highlight new technologies and techniques that are designed for the specific issues of Organic Shales faced by operators in tight oil/gas formations and shale-rich formations . We will also D. Nicolás Espinoza and Carlos Torres-Verdín, examine the impact of near-crisis conditions in the oil industry, and how that has altered Associate Professor/Professor, The University of the approaches to petrophysics analysis and well logging . Texas at Austin, Hildebrand Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering . Wednesday Luncheons Fee: $60 per person The exploration and development of unconventional reservoirs requires effective symbiosis between the disciplines of formation evaluation and geomechanics . Unlocking Value in the Powder River Basin This presentation reviews recent developments concerning the acquisition and Tope Ogunyomi, Director, Juniper Capital interpretation of in-situ measurements of petrophysical and geomechanical properties of rocks to jointly assess storage, production, and fracture potential The Powder River Basin (PRB) is primarily located in southwestern of unconventional rocks . We highlight recent advances in LWD and wireline Montana and northeastern Wyoming . The PRB consists of several measurements as well as in laboratory mechanical and petrophysical testing to oil rich stacked targets with attractive full cycle economics . stress the technological gaps necessary to better map and quantify reservoir Reservoir targets include a combination of conventional (Frontier, mechanical stratigraphy and heterogeneity. Emphasis is placed on the quantification Turner, Parkman, etc ). and unconventional resource (Niobrara and of shale composition, elastic/mechanical anisotropy and compliance of weak Mowry) plays . Due to the on-going successful delineation of the various reservoirs interfaces, and their incorporation into mechanical/flow subsurface models to across the basin, operators such as Devon and EOG are beginning to transition improve predictability of organic-shale reservoir performance . to early stage multi-bench development . Applying industry best practices while incorporating basin specific solutions can unlock substantial value in the basin

WEDNESDAY MORNING PANELS Advanced Characterization of Source Rock Core Samples – An Integrated Digital and Physical Workflow Diagnostics of Surveillance of Reservoirs Joel D. Walls, Director Unconventional Resources Technology, Reservoir surveillance takes on a new significance in a time of pandemic and price Halliburton-Ingrain collapse, when individuals are working from home, and teams have been gutted by furloughs and layoffs. Difficult decisions about production, transportation, and This presentation will focus on best practices for analyzing core reservoir optimization have to be made . Reservoir surveillance becomes a decision- and rotary plug samples from unconventional resource plays . The making tool as well as one for assessing the status of the reservoir, the equipment, reality of current market conditions is that every dollar spent on and operations . We will discuss the new ways in which reservoir surveillance is taking rock characterization must add value to the specific well and to place, and the new tools, technologies, and workflows. We will also discuss which subsequent wells in the same play . Each component of the testing protocol has to data is meaningful in today’s environment, and how to assure data integrity . Finally, serve a specific and well-defined purpose. In many cases the data must be delivered we will take a close look at data analytics, and propose new goals for the analytics, in a timeframe which can impact completion and stimulation decisions on the same which will involve new algorithms, and a physics-based approach . well from which the samples were taken . This means that many long duration tests are not going to add value and must be dropped or substituted for tests that can be done more rapidly . This is where the advantages of digital rock analysis can and should be exploited . Combining selected physical tests with digital rock analysis can not only accelerate reservoir characterization, but also reduce cost . Some recommended workflows and examples from North American shale plays will be shown and explained .

22 Oilfield Services: Lessons Learned from the Past Decade Challenge and Opportunities of Unconventional Oil and Gas and Survival Strategies in the New Decade Development in Asia Pacific Ryan Carbrey, Senior Vice President, Rystad Energy Chair: Bin Yuan This past decade has seen multiple ups and downs for oilfield Focus on international plays, this session will provide an outlook into new services companies . The presentation will begin with a look back unconventional development and serve as a share platform for lessons learned . at lessons learned from the good and tough times, and how those China’s harsh, deep environments have been likened to the Haynesville shale in lessons can guide companies within the industry on thriving and the U .S . and the deep reservoirs found in Bolivia . Further, China’s shale reservoirs surviving in the new industry environment . tend to be from lacustrine shale, and they have different thermal maturity and TOC than marine shales . Those conditions, combined with the fact that it has been imperative to maintain green operations due to the fact that some fields are located in urban environments, have made China’s experience and lessons learned very interesting and applicable to the difficult reservoirs in other parts of the world. We will discuss the findings and the new techniques and technologies, which specifically address imaging, logging while drilling, new completions approaches with modifications to bit and tool design, as well as modifications in drilling fluids.

NETWORKING OPPORTUNITIES

Opening Reception Refreshment Breaks Networking Reception Finish your first full day of URTeC at the Opening Take a quick break from the technical sessions Come wind down your second full day of science Reception in the Exhibit Hall where there is plenty for a cup of coffee, tea, or water and network with a drink and light snack with exhibitors at the of networking and exhibitors to engage with with colleagues or exhibitors . Also a great time to Networking Reception . while having a cold beverage and some hors catch up on emails and walk through the Exhibit Date: Tuesday, 23 July d’oeuvres . Hall to view the latest and greatest technologies . Time: 5:00p–6:00p Date: Monday, 22 July Dates: Monday, 22 July–Wednesday, 24 July Time: 5:00p–7:00p Times: 10:00a–11:00a (Monday–Wednesday) 3:00p–4:00p (Monday and Tuesday)

23 SHORT COURSES

Please visit URTeC.org for all details, policies, and important notes regarding Short Courses .

Title Instructor(s) Date(s)/Time(s) Fees DFIT – The Unconventional David P . Craig Saturday–Sunday, 18–19 $1,400 Member / $1,800 Nonmember / Well Test: Theory, Design, and 1 (Oxy) July, 8:00a–5:00p $500 Students Interpretation (SPE) Unconventional Reservoir Chris Clarkson Saturday–Sunday, 18–19 $1,400 Member / $1,800 Nonmember / Production (Rate-Transient) 2 (University of Calgary) July, 8:00a–5:00p $500 Students Analysis (SPE) Gas EOR in Tight Unconventionals Curtis Hays Whitson (NTNUPE) and Saturday–Sunday, 18–19 $1,400 Member / $1,800 Nonmember / 3 (SPE) Mathias Carlsen (Whitson) July, 8:00a–5:00p $500 Students Reservoir Engineering Applications Ashwin Venkatraman Saturday–Sunday, 18–19 $1,400 Member / $1,800 Nonmember / of Advanced Data Analytics and 4 (ReserMine) July, 8:00a–5:00p $500 Students Machine Learning Algorithms (SPE) Forecasting Well Production Data in Dilhan Ilk Saturday–Sunday, 18–19 $1,400 Member / $1,800 Nonmember / 5 Unconventional Resources (SPE) (DeGolyer and MacNaughton) July, 8:00a–5:00p $500 Students Essentials of Unconventional Play P . Jeffrey Brown (Rose and Associates) and Saturday–Sunday, 18–19 $1,100 Professionals / $300 Students 6 Based Exploration (AAPG) Creties Jenkins (Rose and Associates) July, 8:00a–5:00p Design and Surveillance of Wastewater Disposal Wells Xingru Wu (University of Oklahoma) and Saturday–Sunday, 18–19 $1,100 Professionals / $300 Students 7 for Unconventional Resource David Childers (Lagoon Water Midstream) July, 8:00a–5:00p Development (AAPG) Seismic Anisotropy: Basic Theory Vladimir Grechka (Borehole Seismic) and Saturday–Sunday, 18–19 and Applications in Exploration and $1,145 Professionals / $300 Students 8 Ilya Tsvankin (Colorado School of Mines) July, 8:00a–5:00p Reservoir Characterization (SEG) Carbonate Essentials: Pores to Christopher L . Liner Saturday–Sunday, 18–19 $1,145 Professionals / $300 Students 9 Prospect (SEG) (University of Arkansas) July, 8:00a–5:00p Integrated Geologic, Seismic, Geomechanics, and Reservoir Reinaldo Michelena (Consultant) and Saturday–Sunday, 18–19 Engineering Characterization $1,145 Professionals / $300 Students 10 Chris Zahm (The University of Texas) July, 8:00a–5:00p and Flow Simulation in Fractured Reservoirs (SEG) An Overview of Multistage Aaron Burton Sunday, 19 July $750 Member / $950 Nonmember / Completion Systems for Hydraulic 11 (Unconventional Oil & Gas Training) 8:00a–5:00p $300 Students Fracturing (SPE) Critical Geomechanics Concepts Neal Nagel (OilField Geomechanics LLC) and Sunday, 19 July $750 Member / $950 Nonmember / and Applications to Unconventionals 12 Marisela Sanchez-Nagel (OilField Geomechanics LLC) 8:00a–5:00p $300 Students Completions (SPE) Darcy Spady (Carbon Connect International, MELA Methane Emission Measurement & Methane Emissions Leadership Alliance) and Jackson Sunday, 19 July $750 Member / $950 Nonmember / 13 Mitigation (MEMM) (SPE) Hegland (Methane Emissions Leadership Alliance and 8:00a–5:00p $300 Students Modern West Advisory Consulting Firm) Geomechanics of Reservoir Branko Damjanac Sunday, 19 July Stimulation by Hydraulic Fracturing $650 Professionals / $200 Students 14 (ITASCA Consulting Group, Inc ). 8:00a–5:00p (AAPG) Applied Petroleum Geochemistry Richard Patience (Applied Petroleum Technologies) Sunday, 19 July $650 Professionals / $200 Students 15 (AAPG) and Joe Curiale (Geochemical Advisory Services) 8:00a–5:00p

Important notes regarding Short Courses and the Field Trip: • All short courses as well as the field trip are limited in size and are reserved on a first come, first served basis and must be accompanied by full payment. • If you do not plan to attend the conference, a $30 enrollment fee will be added to the short course and/or field trip fee upon registering. (This fee can be applied to a full-conference registration should you change your mind later ). • A wait list is automatically created when a short course or field trip sells out. URTeC Show Management will notify you if you are on a wait list and when space becomes available. • Before purchasing non-refundable airline tickets, confirm the short course and/or field trip will take place as some may be cancelled if undersubscribed. • Please register well before 30 June 2020 to help guarantee your spot. Short course and field trip cancellations will be considered at this time—no refunds will be accepted for cancellations after this date . • URTeC Show Management will continue to take registrations for events that are not cancelled up until the they are sold out or closed . • Field trip participants should expect an email from the field trip leader approximately 2-3 weeks prior with an itinerary including details of meeting points, transportation, phone numbers, as well as what type of supplies and clothing is necessary . • Neither URTeC, it’s sponsoring organizations, or the field trip leader and their employers maintain insurance covering illness or injury for individuals.

Students: There are a limited number of discounted registrations available for the short courses and field trip. Discounted registrations are on a first come, first served basis with full -pay ment . If a discounted space is still available, it will show up during the online registration process . If discounted spots are no longer available, you may register at the full fee; if we are able to add additional discounted spots we will refund the difference at that time .

24 FIELD TRIP

From Slope to Basin – A Core Workshop Focusing on the Variety of Gravity Flow Deposits throughout the Permian Basins Whole core from both the Delaware and Midland Basins will be examined to understand the changes in slope deposits from both confined and unconfined settings. We will examine a variety of gravity flow deposits within the basins and the processes they were generated from. The end goal of this course will be to understand how these deposits impact reservoir quality in the basins . Formations highlighted will include the Wolfcamp A, 3rd and 2nd Bone Springs from the Delaware Basin, and Wolfcamp and Lower Spraberry from the Midland Basin . We will begin with a 30-minute presentation to introduce the basin and depositional setting followed by working through multiple cores from the Delaware and Midland basins . Transportation to and from the Bureau of Economic Geology will be provided . Outside temperatures can range from 75–100 °F . Closed toed shoes are required for this trip .

Pre-Conference Title Leader(s) Date / Time Fees 1 From Slope to Basin – A Core Workshop Buddy Price, David Carr, Xavier Sunday, 19 July, $240 Professionals / Students Focusing on the Variety of Gravity Flow Deposits Jansen (Bureau of Economic 7:30a–5:00p throughout the Permian Basins (AAPG) Geology), and, Ali Sloan (Parsley Energy)

BEST OF URTEC 2019 TECHNICAL PAPER AWARD WINNERS Kevin Raterman, ConocoPhillips Power Law Behavior Analysis of a Drained Rock Volume: An Eagle Ford Example Vincent Artus, Kappa Hajing Wang, Chevron Flow Regimes Based Decline Curve for Unconventional Reservoirs: Accurate Rock Mineral Characterization with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Generalization to Anomalous Diffusion and Power Law Behavior

Mark Curtis, University of Oklahoma Mark McClure, ResFrac Corporation Visualization of Pore Connectivity Using Mercury Injection Capillary A Collaborative Study on Interpretation of Diagnostic Fracture Injection Pressure Measurements, Micro X-Ray Computed Tomography, and Cryo Tests: Integrating Modeling, Field Data, and Analytical Calculations Scanning Electron Terry Palisch, Carbo Ceramics Mike Perz, TGS Far-Field Proppant Imaging: A Stack Case History Shallow Velocity Model Building Considerations for Pre-Stack Depth Migration in Unconventionals Taylor Lunger, University of Oklahoma Leak Detection in the Wet Natural Gas Transportation Within Hilly Lianbo Hu, University of Oklahoma Terrain Pipelines Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Slippage of a Natural Fracture Resulting from an Approaching Hydraulic Fracture Stephen Sonnenberg, Colorado School of Mines Geology of the Turner Sandstone Finn Shurley Field Powder River Jason Jweda, ConocoPhillips Basin Wyoming Assessing Drainage Dynamics in the Eagle Ford Using Produced Water Geochemistry David Wilcox, Halliburton Multilaterals – An Unconventional Approach to Unconventional Reservoirs Yuxing Ben, Anadarko Petroleum Development and Application of a Real Time Drillng State Classification Akash Sharma, DrillingInfo Algorithm with Machine Learning An Integrated Data-Driven Approach to Quantify Oilfield Water Lifecycle And Economics Amit Katiyar, The Dow Chemical Company Industry-First Hydrocarbon-Foam Eor Pilot in An Unconventional Reservoirs: Generalization to Anomalous Diffusion and

25 TECHNICAL PROGRAM

• Technical Sessions at a Glance • Technical Program – Monday • Technical Program – Tuesday • Technical Program – Wednesday NM CHEROKEE PLATFORM

Blackwell BASIN

ARDMOREOK BASIN Newport

PERMIAN BASIN Millerton Gordon

C-Ranch TX-LA-MS SALT BASIN

Mud City Bayou Boeuf 5 Woodside 5

GoM Programs 3 Including FAN TECHNICAL SESSIONS AT A GLANCE

Session Rooms Exhibit Hall Monday Monday Opening Plenary

Integrated Geochemistry Emerging Case Studies Highlighting Impacts of Hydraulic of Oil-Prone and Gas- Petrophysical Oil Water Separation – Leveraging Geologic Data Fractured Reservoir EUR and Performance Fracture Modeling New Technologies, Funding, Optimizing Completion, Unconventional Reservoir Fracturing and Production Prone Unconventional Common Unconventional Evaluations – Integrated Diagnostic to Better Predict Well Characterization Using Well Prediction: Decline Curve and Stimulation and Commercialization Perforation, and Stimulation Evaluation: Case Studies Drawdown on Well Resource Plays Focuses EOR Session Geochemical and Workflows to Identify Performance Data and Modeling Analysis and Beyond II Optimization Strategies I Productivity with Geology and Geomechanical Fracture Geometry Petrophysics Analysis

Integrated Geochemistry of Oil-Prone and Reservoir Modeling Innovative Technology Adoption Natural Fracture Pore-Network Imaging and Finding the SRV: Integrated Gas-Prone for Unconventionals – Technologies to Reservoir Simulation Experiences from Characterization: Lab Fluid Flow Modeling Approaches Unconventional Resource Bringing Together Data, Reduce Completion to Well Performance the Field Measurements Plays with Geology and Disciplines, and Design EUR and Costs Case Studies Highlighting Production Diagnostics Diagnostics and Petrophysics II Performance Optimizing Completion, — Understanding the Big Monitoring with Prediction: Decline Perforation, and Stimulation Picture on Production Geomechanical Models Application of Time Lapse Curve Analysis Strategies Natural Fracture Forecasting Geochemistry Innovative Data Analytics and Physics Advances in Formation and Beyond Impacts on Well Finding the SRV: Downhole Characterization and to Estimation of Recovery, Technologies to Informed Model - Evaluation of Gas Injection IOR/EOR Construction, Design, Monitoring Detection at Drainage, Resource Reduce Completion The Latest and Greatest Unconventional Reservoirs and Drilling Borehole Scale Volumes, and Costs Enhanced Recovery Tuesday Tuesday Flow and Phase Case Studies Highlighting Mechanical Stratigraphy: Business of Reservoir Behavior for Tight Hydraulic Fracturing and Its Optimizing Completion, Novel Approaches Unconventionals: Reservoir Simulation to Characterization and Well Case Studies in IOR/EOR Case Studies Oil and Shale Oil/ Effects on Well Integrity Perforation, and Stimulation to Geomechanics Maximizing Value and Well Performance Placement Using Modern Field Pilots International Highlighting Shale Gas Reservoir Strategies Measurements Reliability I Tools and Workflows Challenges of Advanced Special Cross-Discipline Leveraging Optimizing Systems Rock-Fluid and Fluid- Unconventional Core Analysis and of Data Mining, Modeling, completion, Fluid Interactions Resources: Integrated Core Flooding Effective Communications and Data Analytics Perforation, Impacts on Well Geoscience and Hydraulic Fracture Operating in the Mechanical Stratigraphy: Strategies for Changing Downhole CO Separation Eagle Ford Focused and Stimulation Important IOR/EOR Construction, Design, 2 Engineering Test Site Permian Basin Examples from the Field Times and Social and Sequestration EOR Session Strategies Concepts and Drilling Investment and Impacts

Reservoir Modeling Best Practices of Global Advances in Sub-Surface Geophysical Reservoir Fracture Modeling for Unconventionals New Insights to Well Spacing and Well Unconventional Resources: Important IOR/EOR Formation Evaluation Characterization vs . Early Characterization: Statistical Case Studies and Stimulation – Bringing Together Hydraulic Fractures Interference Impact I Integrated Geoscience and Concepts of Unconventional Facilities Design Seismic Attribute Methods Highlighting Optimization Data, Disciplines, Engineering I Reservoirs II Drivers for Understanding All About the Rock: Lab New Methods Optimizing and Design Reservoir Quality and Measurements and for Subsurface Completion, Completion Quality Modeling Characterization Best Practices of Perforation, and Case Studies Highlighting Geophysical Reservoir Novel Proppants, Impacts of Hydraulic Oil/Gas/Water: Fluid-Fluid, Global Unconventional Stimulation Synergies and Calibration Optimizing Completion, Characterization: Seismic "Big Data" Applications to Lower Environmental Fracturing and Fluid-Rock Interactions and Resources: Integrated Strategies Gas Injection IOR/EOR with Geothermal Industry Perforation, and Stimulation Attribute Driven Unconventional Reservoirs Impact Fluids, and Production Drawdown Chemostratigraphy Geoscience and Strategies Decision Making Additives on Well Productivity Engineering II Wednesday Wednesday

Applications of EUR and Performance Stacked Pay Development Stratigraphic and Structural Integration of Numerical Integrated Diagnostic Resources, Effective New Technologies Diagnostics of Surveillance High and Low Field Well Spacing and Well Source Rock Machine Learning Prediction: Decline Strategies/Well Spacing to Characterization of Models and Data Science in Workflows to Identify Communication, and and Techniques in of Reservoirs NMR Applications Interference Impact II Characterization in Unconventional Curve Analysis and Field Development Unconventional Reservoirs Reservoir Characterization Fracture Geometry Social License to Operate Geophysics Reservoirs Beyond III - cont'd . Fracture Modeling and Stimulation Optimization Challenge and Opportunities Business of Geological Well Spacing and Well Innovative Technologies Integrated of Unconventional Oil and Unconventionals: Emerging Petrophysical Rock-Fluid and Fluid-Fluid Reservoir Monitoring and Geomechanics for Well and Reservoir Workflows for Geochemistry Interference Impact III - to Reduce Completions Geophysical and Gas Development in Maximizing Value and and Core Data Evaluations I Interactions I Well Spacing Spacing and Stacking Characterization of Disparate Data Sets Meets EOR cont'd . Costs I Geologic Modeling Asia Pacific Reliability II Unconventional Plays

Challenge and Opportunities Emerging Petrophysical Pressure Transient Testing, Well Spacing and Well Infill Drilling and Innovative Technologies Impacts on Well of Unconventional Oil and Case Studies of Game- Reservoir Monitoring and and Core Data DFIT, and Interference Impact II - Refracturing: Applications to Reduce Completions Construction, Design Exhibit Hall Closed Gas Development in Asia Changing Results Well Spacing II Evaluations II Well Testing cont'd . and Lessons Learned Costs II and Drilling Pacific - cont'd.

28 Session Rooms Exhibit Hall Monday Monday Opening Plenary

29 MONDAY TECHNICAL PROGRAM

Theme 5: Integrated Geochemistry of Oil-Prone and Gas-Prone MONDAY MORNING – SESSION ROOMS Unconventional Resource Plays with Geology and Petrophysics I Chairs: T. Euzen, W. Wang Theme 1: Case Studies Highlighting Optimizing Completion, • Mapping Liquid Recovery Potential in an Unconventional Play: A Practical Perforation, and Stimulation Strategies I Workflow Integrating Geology, Geochemistry, and PVT Properties (Montney Chairs: J. Lassek, Y. Pradhan Formation, Canada): T . Euzen1, N . Watson2, A . Cui3, J . Wilson3 (1IFP • Second Bone Spring Sand Development Strategies within the Delaware Technologies (Canada) Inc ;. 2Enlighten Geoscience Ltd ;. 3AGAT Laboratories) Basin, West Texas and Southeast New Mexico: T . O’Toole, A . Adebare, • Identification and Characterization of Oil Groups in the Midland Basin S. Wright, P. Sanghvi, K. Schwartz (Chevron) Using HRGC Source and Maturity Parameters Measured on >1,600 Oils and Condensates: S . Prosser1, A. Kornacki*2, M . Laughland2, Theme 2: Unconventional Reservoir Evaluation: Case Studies M . McCaffrey2, S. Vincent1 (1Pioneer Natural Resources; 2Stratum Reservoir) Chairs: J. Salazar, F. Nath • A Comparison of Hydrocarbon Extraction Techniques: Trying to Make a • An Integrated Workflow for Complex Characterization of Formation Water Mountain from a Mole Hill: C . M . Donohue, C . Barrie, B . Jarvie, of Shale Reservoir Rocks. A Case Study of Bazhenov Formation: J . A . Zumberge, J . E . Zumberge (Geomark Research) E. S. Kazak2,1, A. V. Kazak2, (1Lomonosov Moscow State University; 2Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech) Theme 7: Common Unconventional Focuses EOR Session • A More Accurate Integrated Multimineral Petrophysical Model in Chairs: U. Ahmed, J. Alvarez Unconventional Reservoirs using Data From Cuttings: A Case Study from • Integrating Pressure and Stress Field Evolution for Cluster Spacing Powder River Basin, USA: K. Ahmed1, P . Lowrey1, K. Graham2, D . Merkel3 Optimization in Unconventional Reservoirs with Infill Wells: Y . Pei, (1Halliburton; 2Rebellion Energy; 3Denver Petrophysics LLC) K. Sepehrnoori (The University of Texas at Austin) • Assisted History Matching using Bayesian Inference: Application to Theme 3: Leveraging Geologic Data to Better Predict Well Performance Multi-Well Simulation of a Huff-n-Puff Pilot Test in the Permian Basin: Chair: K. Keller E. Eltahan, R. Ganjdanesh, W. Yu, K. Sepehrnoori (The University of Texas • A Multi-Disciplinary Modeling Approach to Determine Economic Viability at Austin) of Infill Horizontal Well Development in the Green River Basin: T . H . Levon, J . Mazza (Fracture ID) MONDAY MORNING – EXHIBIT HALL SESSIONS Theme 3: Fractured Reservoir Characterization Using Well Data and Theme 2: Emerging Petrophysical Evaluations – Geochemical and Modeling Geomechanical Analysis Chairs: M. Badri, R. Brinkerhoff Chair: A. Mitra • Geocellular Static and Dfn Modeling of Unconventional Fractured • An Integrated Geomechanical, Petrophysical, and Petrographical Study Reservoirs in the Middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia: F . A . Lozano, to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Plug Cleaning Technique for Ultra-Low J . M . Marentes, J . Piedrahita, N . P . Rubio (Ecopetrol) Permeability Rocks: A . Guedez1, S . Govindarajan1, D . Lambert2, • Clustering and Connectivity of Fractal-Fracture Networks in Reservoir S. Keyes2, R . Patterson1, W . Mickelson1, A . Mitra1, S . Aldin1, D . Gokaraju1, Analogs: A. K. Sahu, A. Roy* (Indian Institute of Technology) A . Thombare1, M . Aldin1 (1MetaRock Laboratories, 2Petricore) • Characterizing Subsurface Fracture Density and Spatial Pattern in the • Field-Scale Study on the Impacts of Geochemistry and Wettability on East Painter Reservoir Anticline, Wyoming: Q. Wang, S. E. Laubach Water Production in the Permian Basin: A . Jagadisan, A . Rostami, (The University of Texas at Austin) Z . Heidari* (The University of Texas at Austin) • Microscopic Measurement of Shale Swelling: Impact of Salinity: Theme 8: EUR and Performance Prediction: Decline Curve Analysis and M . Mokhtari, P . Parrikar, A . Saidzade (University of Louisiana at Lafayette) Beyond III Chairs: Z. Chen, P. Sainani, D. T. Vo Theme 9: Oil Water Separation – Integrated Diagnostic Workflows to Identify • Significant Error Reduction in Machine-Learning Decline Curve Analysis Fracture Geometry for Unconventional Reservoirs: B . Li1, T . C . Billiter2, T . Tokar1 (1Chevron Chairs: L. Shen, I. Aviles Energy Technology Company; 2Chevron North America Exploration and • Large-Scale Separation Efficiency of Dispersed Oil Micro-Droplets from Production Company) Aqueous Phase with Magnetic Nanoparticles: A . Ettehadtavakkol • Applications of the Diffusive Time of Flight to a Data Driven Approach for (Texas Tech University) Decline Curve Analysis: A. Bansal, M. J. King (Texas A&M University) • GQ – Complete the Science of Multistage Fracturing and Completion with • Automating Petrophysics and Decline Curves Analysis for Performance Geology Considerations: Y . Liu, H . Li, W . Wang (Schlumberger) Prediction at the Basin-Scale: Application to the Powder River Basin: • Estimating the Size and Orientation of Hydraulic Fractures using C . A . Snow, R . Gunther (Danomics) Microseismic Events: M. AlQassab, W. Yu, K. Sepehrnoori (The University of Texas at Austin) Theme 4: Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing and Production Drawdown on Well Productivity Theme 4: Fracture Modeling and Stimulation Optimization Chairs: K. Wu, W. Fu Chairs: M. Azeemuddin, K. Qiu • Induced Shear Fracture Area Contributes Appreciably to Production: • A Comparative Study of Monotonic and Cyclic Injection Hydraulic A Case Study from Nine Wells in the Midland Basin: M. Kintzing1, 2 2 3 1 2 3 Fracturing in Saturated Tight Rocks Under Triaxial Stress: S . Goyal, K. LaMotta , T . Ruths , M . Zoback* ( SM Energy; Petro .ai; Stanford M . Curtis, C . Sondergeld, C . Rai (University of Oklahoma) University) • Modeling Interactions of Natural Fractures and Two-Phase Fluid Filled • Data Predict the Optimal Drawdown for Woodford and Mayes in the 1 2 1 1 1 2 Fracture Propagation in Porous Media: M . Wheeler , S . Lee Anadarko Basin: A . Alzahabi , A. A. Kamel , A . Harouaka , A . Trindade , 1 2 3 1 2 3 ( The University of Texas at Austin; Florida State University) W . Baustian ( University of Texas Permian Basin; Texas Tech; Camino • Multi-Scale Geomechanical Evaluations to Enable Stimulation Natural Resources) Optimization for Deep Shale Gas Reservoir in Sichuan Basin, Western China: K. Qiu (Schlumberger)

30 *Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation • Delaware Basin Wolfcamp a Productivity Analysis and Technically MONDAY AFTERNOON – SESSION ROOMS Recoverable Resources Projection: Q. Yang1, S . Ikonnikova2, K. Smye1, A . Gherabati1, G . McDaid1 (1University of Texas at Austin; 22TUM School of Theme 1: Case Studies Highlighting Optimizing Completion, Perforation, Management, Technical University of Munich) and Stimulation Strategies II • Rate Transient Analysis of Fracture Swarm Fractal Networks: J . A . Acuna Chairs: A. Singh, S. Szlendak, D. S. Jones (Chevron) • Utilization of Multidisciplinary Data Gathering to Evaluate Extreme • Hydraulic Fracture Test Site Drained Rock Volume and Recovery Factors Limited Entry Completion Design to Improve Perforation Cluster Visualized by Scaled Complex Analysis Method Models: Emulating Multiple Efficiency: A . Lorwongngam, S . Wright, J . Wolters, S . Hari, E . Shade, Data Sources (Production Rates, Water Cuts, Pressure Gauges, Flow Regime M. McKimmy, C. Cipolla (Hess) Changes, and B-Sigmoids): R . Weijermars1, K. Nandlal1, • The Field-Level Effects of the Scoop/Stack Play and its Completion on M . F . Tugan1, R . Dusterhoft2, N . Stegent2 (1Texas A&M University; 2Halliburton) Hydrocarbon Production: S . Banerjee1, C . Mallory2, W . DeAngelis3, • Numerically Enhanced RTA Workflow — Improving Estimation of Both Linear N . Geisler1 (1Tracerco; 2Chaparrel Energy, LLC; 3Chaparral Energy, LLC) Flow Parameter and Hydrocarbons in Place: B . Bowie (Apache Corporation) • Evaluating Primary-Infill Well Performance after Frac Mitigation using • Real Time SRV Integrity Monitoring Using Dynamic Productivity Index: Fracture-Type Diagnostics in the Midland Basin Wolfcamp Shale: C. Aniemena, K. Suter, A. Labryer (BPX Energy) R . Y . Scherz1, Y . U . Pradhan, M . Rainbolt2, A . McMurray3, (1Endeavor Energy 2 3 Resources, LP; Abra Controls Corporation; Shear Frac Group LLC) Theme 4: Diagnostics and Monitoring with Geomechanical Models • A Novel Thermochemical Fracturing Approach to Reduce Fracturing Chairs: TBD Pressure of High Strength Rocks: A . Al-Nakhli (Saudi Aramco) • Strain and Strain-Rate Responses Measured by LF-DAS and Corresponding Features for Fracture Hit Detection During Multiple Theme 2: Pore-Network Imaging and Fluid Flow Modeling Fracture Propagation in Unconventional Reservoirs: Y . Liu1, K. Wu1, G . Chairs: J. J. H. Howard, L. Jin Jin2, G . J . Moridis1,3 (1Texas A&M University; 2Colorado School of Mines; • Comparative Study of Pore Structure Parameters for Various Rock 3Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) Samples: Y . Zhang, R . G . Moghanloo, D . Davudov (University of Oklahoma) • Fiber Optic Strain Monitoring of Hydraulic Stimulation: Geomechanical • Nano-Imaging of Shale using Electron Microscopy Techniques: L . Froute, Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis: Z . Zhang, Z . Fang, J . Stefani, A. R. Kovscek (Stanford University) J. DiSiena, D. Bevc, Y. Tan, I. Lim Chen Ning, Kelly Hughes, Yunhui Tan • Pore Scale Study of Methane Advection and Diffusion in an Image-Based (Chevron Energy Technology Company) 3-D Reconstruction of Shale with Consideration of Bound Water: R. Xu1, • Rapid Analysis of Offset Well Pressure Response During Fracturing: Y . Yin2, C . Landry1, M . Prodanovic*1 (1The University of Texas at Austin; Distinguishing Between Poroelastic, Hydraulic, and Frac-Hit Responses 2Xi’an Jiaotong University) in Field Data: P . Seth, B . Elliott, M . Sharma (The University of Texas at Austin) Theme 3: Finding the SRV: Integrated Approaches • A Coupled Reservoir-Geomechanical Modeling of Out-of-Sequence Chair: R. Pearson Fracturing: M . Nassir1, B . Yadali Jamaloei*2, D . Walters1, E . G . Schmelzl2 • Insights into Fracture Fluid Allocation and Fracture Geometry in (1CGG (Canada) Services Inc .; 2NCS Multistage Inc .) Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Wells through Thermal Simulations • Study of the Marcellus Shale Energy and Environmental Lab (MSEEL) and Fiber Optics Distributed Temperature Sensing (FO - DTS) Completion Designs Using Fracture Modeling: R. Bohn, X. Wan, V. Rasouli Measurements: S. Ghosh, D. Zhou, J. App, L. Jain, K. Hughes, D. Emery, (University of North Dakota) J . Fu, R . Zhang (Chevron Corporation) • Pressure History Matching for Multi-Well Completions: J . Sovizi, • Fracture Properties Estimation using Seismic DAS Recordings: E. Dontsov, D. Sassen, M. Wolinsky, R. Suarez-Rivera (W.D. Von Gonten A . Lellouch1, M . A . Meadows2, T . Nemeth2, B . Biondi1 (1Stanford University; Laboratories) 2Chevron ETC) • Time-Lapse DAS Seismic Monitoring to Characterize Hydraulic Fracture Theme 5: Integrated Geochemistry of Oil-Prone and Gas-Prone Geometry across Multiple Wells in the Midland Basin: G . Binder1, A . Titov1, Unconventional Resource Plays with Geology and Petrophysics II G . Jin1, J . Simmons1, A . Tura1, A . Gunnell2, P . Aaron2, M . Yates2 (1Colorado Chairs: S. Macalello, L. T. Bryndzia School of Mines; 2Apache Corporation) • The Impact of Spacing and Time on Gas/Oil Ratio in the Permian Basin: A Multi-Target Machine Learning Approach: K. Sathaye1, T . Cross1, Theme 3: Natural Fracture Characterization: Lab Measurements K. Darnell1, J . Reed2, J . Ramey1, D . Niederhut1 (1Novi Labs; 2Enverus) Chairs: Y. Tan, S. Mukherjee • Integration of Geochemical and Stratigraphic Properties for Identifying • Time-Lapse Acoustic Monitoring of Facture Alteration in Marcellus Potential Highly Restricted Lacustrine-Embayment Deposits in the Shale: J . Ding1, A . C . Clark1, T. Vanorio1, A . D . Jew2, J . R . Bargar2 (1Stanford Woodford Shale Speake Ranch Outcrop: E . J . Torres1, R . M . Slatt1, University; 2SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory) R . P . Philp1, D . M . Becerra-Rondon2, H . A . Galvis-Portilla2 (1University of • Anisotropic Assessment of Upper, Middle, and Lower Bakken Formations Oklahoma; 2University of Calgary) using Multi-Physical Rock Measurements: G. Firdaus, V. Suarez, • Integration of Geochemical and Petrophysical Measurements from M . Prasad (Colorado School of Mines) Drill Cuttings for Unconventional Reservoir Characterization, Converse • Acoustic Velocity Modeling of Unconventional Reservoirs: A . Simone, County, Powder River Basin: B . Wittman1, M . Dick2, M . Hemenway3, L . Hathon, M . Myers (University of Houston) H . Rowe3, D. Veselinovic2, T. Kenney2, D . Green2 (1Grayson Mill Energy; 2Green Imaging; 3Premier Oilfield Group) Theme 8: Production Diagnostics — Understanding the Big Picture on Production Forecasting Theme 7: Reservoir Modeling for Unconventionals – Bringing Together Data, Chairs: S. Matringe, N. Moridis, K. Richter Disciplines, and Design • Revisiting Production Outlooks of the Eagle Ford and Bakken Plays: Chairs: G. Koperna, J. Alvarez Analysis of the Well Productivity and Play Economics Changes Over the • An Integrated Reservoir Modeling Case Study to Simulate Multi- Last 5 Years: S . Ikonnikova1,2, Q. Yang1, K. Smye1, G . McDaid1, (1Bureau Stage Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Wells, Based on Seismic, of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin; 2TUM School of Petrophysical, and Geological Data for Pinedale Tight Gas Fluvial Management, Technical University of Munich) Reservoir: M . Gaddipati1, T . Firincioglu1, E . LaBarre2, Y . Yang2, D . Wahl2, • Artificial Intelligence for Production Enhancement in Unconventional P . Clarke2, A . Long2, C . Ozgen1 (1NITEC LLC; 2Ultra Petroleum) Reservoirs: O. M. Molina, C. Mejia, R. Nye (ENOVATE Corporation) • Integrated Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Predict Reservoir Performance: The Diyab Reservoir Abu Dhabi: C . Barton, G . Izadi, J . Tinnin, S . Randazzo, A . Ghadimipour, Y . Bouzida (Baker Hughes)

*Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation 31 MONDAY TECHNICAL PROGRAM

Theme 2: Advances in Formation Evaluation of Unconventional Reservoirs • Insights Gained from Fifty Large Volume Primary Depletion Gas Cycling Chairs: K. Yared, L. T. Sloan Huff-n-Puff Experiments in the Montney and Duvernay Formations: • Wettability of Permian Rocks and Implications on Relative Permeability F . B . Thomas1, M . Noroozi2, M . Piwowar2, W . Gibb2, J . Marin2, R . Apil2, and Reservoir Modeling: S . A . Alzobaidi, S . S . Chhatre, M . D . Rudnicki, H . Zhang2, J . Yeo3, D . Sharp3, A . Ceccanese3 (1Reservoir Optimization R. Longoria, A. L. Chen, K. B. Guice (ExxonMobil) Strategies; 2Stratum Reservoir; 3Birchcliff Energy Ltd .) • Using Fluid Inclusion Salinity Data to Reduce Uncertainty in Petrophysical

SW Calculation — New Application of an Old Technique in Unconventional Reservoirs: B . Gal, Z . Poros, E . Ortega (ConocoPhillips) MONDAY AFTERNOON – EXHIBIT HALL SESSIONS • Revisiting the Concept of Pore System Partitioning for Organic-Rich Tight Rocks: S . T . Dang, S . Mukherjee, S . Mamoudou, C . Sondergeld, C . Rai Theme 8: EUR and Performance Prediction: Decline Curve Analysis and (University of Oklahoma) Beyond II Chairs: L. Deng, K. Essary, F. Millancourt Theme 3: Finding the SRV: Downhole Monitoring • Model-Based Type Wells Reduce Uncertainty in Production Forecasting Chair: R. Pearson for Unconventional Wells: A . Ravikumar, J . Lee (Texas A&M University) • A Reservoir Simulation-Oriented Investigation into Large-Scale • Initial Flow Rate Relationships to Decline Trends and Reserves: 1 1 1 1 2 1 Conductive Fractures in the Mississippian Stack Oil Reservoirs: B . W . Hale , B . Hale* , A . Warren , R. K. Hall , W . M . Cobb ( Russell K Hall 2 C . M . Freeman1, S . Geetan2, R . MacDonald2, T . Firincioglu1, C . Ozgen1 & Associates; Retired) (1Nitec, LLC; 2Alta Mesa Resources) • Semi-Analytical Approach of Production Performance Analysis for Shale • Discerning Fracture Geometries with Routine Reservoir Surveillance Data Gas Well by use of Green’s Function Method: J . Wang, A . Jia, Y . Wei (CNPC) Supported by Integrated Modeling in Uinta Basin, Utah: T . S . Ong, L . John • Generate Inflow Performance Relationship for Conventional and (Encana Corp) Unconventional Reservoirs using Reservoir Models Instead of 1 1 1 2 • To Stack or Stagger: Learnings from Integrated Microseismic and SRV Correlations: S . H . Tabatabaie , C . Tewari , S . Davies , L . Mattar , 1 1 2 Modeling to Evaluate Well Configuration and Treatment Sequence in the J . Prefontaine* ( IHS Markit; SPE) Permian: P . Dillett1, E . Hiemstra1, R . Storniolo1, R . Nader2, P . Moradi2, • Analytical Methodology for Three-Phase Rate Transient Analysis in D . Angus2, K. Jeziorski*2 (1Birch Resources; 2ESG Solutions) Low-Permeability Volatile Oil/Gas Condensate Reservoirs: L . Luo, J . Lee (Texas A&M University) • Machine Learning Based Decline Curve — Spatial Method to Estimate Theme 3: Natural Fracture Characterization: Detection at Borehole Scale Production Potential of Proposed Wells in Unconventional Shale Gas Chairs: Y. Tan, S. Mukherjee Reservoirs: Y. Kocoglu, M. Wigwe, S. Gorell (Texas Tech University) • Detecting Induced Fractures using Drilling Data to Gain Insights into • Replacing Decline Curve Analysis: R . D . Hazlett1, U . Farooq2, K. Babu3 Unconventional Fracture Growth: K. Wutherich, S. Srinivasan, W. Katon (1Nazarbayev University; 2University of Tulsa; 3Potential Research (Drill2Frac) Solutions) • Characterizing Natural Fractures and Sub-seismic Faults for Well Completion of Marcellus Shale in the MSEEL Consortium Project, West Virginia, USA: B . Li1, B . Carney2, T . Carr3 (1Blackriver Geoscience LLC; Theme 9: Innovative Technologies to Reduce Completion Costs 2Northeast Natural Energy LLC; 3West Virginia University) Chairs: S. Schroeder, B. Horton • Reducing Well Construction Costs through Field Application of New Unconventional Lightweight Cementing Solutions — Multiple Case Theme 5: Application of Time Lapse Geochemistry to Estimation of Histories in the Permian Basin: F . Padilla, R . Pernites*, M . Montgomery, Recovery, Drainage, Resource Volumes, and Enhanced Recovery D . Fu, (BJ Services) Chair: M. Formolo • Innovative Gun System Tackles Tomorrow’s Challenges to Unconventional • A Statistical Approach to Understanding Fluid Geochemistry Changes Completions: C . E . Felicio Guedes, S . Aboelnaga, A . Prisbell (Schlumberger) in Unconventional Plays: C . D . Barrie, C . M . Donohue, J . A . Zumberge (Geomark Research) • Integrating Oil and Water Geochemistry to Assess SRV and DRV in the Theme 4: Reservoir Simulation to Well Performance Bakken/Three Forks Hybrid Play: H . Long, E . Michael, S . Bordoloi, Y . Liu, Chair: N. Espinoza B. Rajappa, B. Weaver, N. McMahan, K. McLin (ConocopPhillips) • Impact of Fluid Heterogeneity on a Tight Unconventional Well GOR • Reflecting Fracture Network Complexity or Matrix Flow Characteristics? Performance: F . M . Alqahtani, M . Dahouk, C . H . Whitson, E . Chuparova An Investigation on the Appropriate Model for Flowback Salinity Data (NTNU Whitson AS) Analysis: Q. Liu (Husky Energy) • Effect of Stress-Dependent Reservoir Properties on Production from a • From Reservoir Characterization to Production Monitoring: An Source Rock Reservoir: H . O . Balan, A . Gupta, H-H . Liu (Aramco Services Integrated Workflow to Optimize Field Development using Geochemical Company) Fingerprinting Technology: F . Liu1, J . Wu1, M . Jin1, D . Bell2, K. Newsham2 (1RevoChem LLC; 2Occidental Petroleum Corporation) Theme 9: Innovative Technologies to Reduce Completion Costs Chairs: S. Schroeder, B. Horton • Performance of Friction Reducers in Iron Rich Environments: S . Hazra1, Theme 7: Gas Injection IOR/EOR M. Van Domelen2, W . Cutrer2, B . Darlington3, P . Okullo3, N . Peregoy3, Chairs: F. Tovar, K. Ahmadi (1DynaChem Research Center; 2Downhole Chemical Solutions; 3Ovintiv Inc .) • Experimental and Modeling Studies of Cyclic Gas Injection EOR in • Optimizing Fluid Compatibility in Produced Waters: T . A . Galindo Niobrara Shales: Z. Zhu, X. Yin, E. Ozkan, Y. Coskuner (GeoKimika Oil & Gas) (Colorado School of Mines) • Identifying the Variables of Laboratory Flow Loop Design that Influence • Compositional Reservoir Simulation of Gas Huff-n-Puff — Impact of Friction Reducer Recommendations for the Field: M . D . Hurd, Physical Dispersion, Numerical Dispersion, and Molecular Diffusion: W. McDonough, E. Smith, P. Henderson (Kemira) S. S. Chhatre, M. Izadi, T. A. Wahlheim, A. L. Chen, K. G. Guice • Case Studies: New Friction Reducer Assurance Check Process Enables (ExxonMobil) Precise Tuning of FR Performance in Response to Potential Water • Use of Gas and Chemical Blend for Shale Oil Huff-n-Puff EOR: Conditions During Hydraulic Fracturing: L. Xu, J. Ogle, H. Riley, I. Straffin, K. Mohanty, T. Zeng, C. Miller, M. Aung (The University of Texas at Austin) T . DuBois (Halliburton)

32 *Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation YOU’RE READY. IS YOUR LAS DATA?

SPENDING TOO MUCH TIME CLEANING LAS FILES? HAVING TROUBLE DISCOVERING AND UNDERSTANDING YOUR LOGS? CAN’T EASILY ACCESS YOUR LOGS WHEN AND HOW YOU NEED THEM?

If any of this sounds familiar, get LAS WORX working for you. It’s easy to use – you’ll be up and running in minutes, quickly finding, cleaning and accessing your digital logs.

Learn how the LAS WORX suite of log data efficiency applications can save you time and money and help put more of your energy into finding oil & gas.

403-869-2112 EMAIL [email protected] TO SCHEDULE [email protected] YOUR LAS WORX DEMO TODAY. nrgx.ca MONDAY TECHNICAL PROGRAM

Theme 4: Impacts on Well Construction, Design, and Drilling Chairs: M. Azeemuddin, K. Qiu • Influence of the Lost Circulation Material Injection Method on the Fracture Plugging: A Visualization Experimental Study: Y . Feng1, R . Li2, G . Li2 (1Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology; 2Southwest Petroleum University) • Computed Tomography Study of Annular Cement Mechanical Response Under Cyclic Hydraulic Stress: A . Anya, H . Emadi, M . Watson (Texas Tech University) • Development of Hydraulic Fracture Hits and Fracture Redirection Visualized for Consecutive Fracture Stages with Fast Time-Stepped Linear Superposition Method (TLSM): T . Pham, R . Weijermars (Texas A&M University) • High Fidelity Directional Survey Calculations Can Improve Hydraulic Fracture Positioning In Unconventional Laterals: W . G . Lesso, T . Patton (Superior Quality Control)

34 *Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation TUESDAY TECHNICAL PROGRAM

Theme 6: Cross-Discipline Leveraging of Data Mining, Modeling, TUESDAY MORNING – SESSION ROOMS and Data Analytics Chairs: B. Jeyachandra, B. Dindoruk, A. Bogdan Theme 1: Case Studies Highlighting Optimizing Completion, Perforation, • From Waste to Insight: Generating High Resolution Geochemical and Stimulation Strategies Models from Publicly Available Residual Waste Profiles: J . Mackey1,2, Chairs: W. Wu, C. Cipolla J . Gardiner1,3, B. Kutchko1, G . Lackey1,3, A . Hakala1, (1National Energy • An Operator’s Success Story Using Hydraulic Completion Units in Super Technology Laboratory; 2Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education; Laterals in the Appalachian Basin: J . H . Frantz1, K. Hollerich1, D . Uka 3Battelle) Oelkers2, S . Segrest2, K. Bradford2, A . Pottmeyer2, H . Pottmeyer2 (1Deep • Development of a Machine-Learning-Based Workflow for Well Completion Well Services; 2Montage Resources) Optimization in the Permian Basin: A . Sun, L . Wang*, J . Gale (University of Texas at Austin) Theme 2: Advanced Special Core Analysis and Core Flooding • Application of Both Physics-Based and Data-Driven Techniques for Real- Chairs: A. Reynolds, K. Jerath Time Screen-Out Prediction with High Frequency Data: J . Sun, A . Battula, • Permeability Degredation Using NMR: C . Barnes, S . Ali, A . Mathur, B . Chin, B . Hruby, P . Hossaini (Noble Energy) C. Belanger, J. Treadwell (W.D. Von Gonten Laboratories) • Drilling and Completion Anomaly Detection in Daily Reports by Deep • A Novel Experimental Approach for Dynamic Quantification of Liquid Learning and Natural Language Processing Techniques: H . Zhang1, Saturation and Capillary Pressure in Shale: W . O . Ozowe, R . T . Russell, L . Liao1, X. Chen2, Z . Huang2, J . Song2 (1Sinopec Research Institute of M . M . Sharma (The University of Texas at Austin) Petroleum Engineering; 2Sinopec International Exploration and Production • Using 3-D Printed Rocks for the Systematic Evaluation of Stress Corporation) Dependent Dual Permeability in Fractured Rock: Y . Guo1, N . Deisman1, • Advanced Machine Learning Methods for Prediction of Fracture Closure T . Flottmann2, K. Hodder1, R . J . Chalaturnyk1 (1University of Alberta; Pressure: M . Salah1, M . Ibrahim2 (1Khalda Petroleum; 2Apache Corp .) 2Origin Energy) • Evaluation and Optimization of Completion Design using Machine • Porosity and Permeability Heterogeneity in the Wolfcamp Formation of Learning in an Unconventional Light Oil Play: L . Porras1, C . Hawkes1, the Delaware Basin, West Texas: Implications for Production: A . Islam2 (1University of Saskatchewan; 2Baytex Energy Corp) S . Ramiro-Ramirez1, A . R . Bhandari1, P . B . Flemings1,2, R . M . Reed3, (1The • Increasing Frac Operations Performance using Real-Time Monitoring of University of Texas at Austin, Jackson School of Geosciences, Institute Frac Fluid Chemistry, and Treatment Data Key Performance Indicators: for Geophysics; 2The University of Texas at Austin, Jackson School of J . Hurtado, S . Rutherford, M . Mayer (ReStream Solutions) Geosciences, Department of Geological Sciences; 3The University of Texas at Austin, Jackson School of Geosciences, Bureau of Economic Geology) Theme 4: Reservoir Simulation to Well Performance • Effect of Size on Mechanical Properties of Unconventional Shale Chairs: K. Wu, W. Fu Samples: V. K. Singh, I. Faoro, K. Holmes, L. Morales, A. Kumar • Numerical Investigation of Water Flowback Characteristics for (Core Laboratories) Unconventional Gas Reservoirs with Complex Fracture Geometries: • Experimental Evaluation of Relative Permeability in Tight Oil Systems: Y . Liu1, L . Liu1, J . Y . Leung2, K. Wu1, G . J . Moridis1,3, (1Texas A&M University; Examples from North American Tight Oil Plays: A . Ghanizadeh, C . Song, 2University of Alberta; 3Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory) C . R . Clarkson, A . Younis (University of Calgary) • Development of an Agile Framework for Model-Order Reduction of Large-Scale Geomechanical Models: A Novel Workflow for Coupled Theme 3: Mechanical Stratigraphy: Novel Approaches to Geomechanics Simulations: P . Morkos, E . Gildin (Texas A&M University) Measurements • Unlocking an Unconventional Reservoir with a Fully Integrated Reservoir Chairs: M. Rauch, S. Tuttle Simulation: P . Ye, F . Hovland, F . Rasdi (Equinor) • Modeling Mechanical Properties of Unconventional Reservoirs: Theory and Data: J . Dvorkin1, J . Walls*2, G . Dava2 (1King Fahd University of Theme 3: Reservoir Characterization and Well Placement Using Modern Petroleum and Minerals; 2Halliburton) Tools and Workflows • Regionally Interpolated Pore Pressure Model Utilizing Multiple Empirical Chairs: TBD Methods in the Delaware Basin: Y . Li, J . Roberts (Devon Energy) • High Resolution Cuttings Analysis for Well Placement in the Uintah Basin: • Rock Physics Modelling to Improve Pore Pressure Prediction in I . Permata1, S. Khakimov*1, O . Elshahawy1, S. Kenzhekhanov2, M . Toktarov1 Unconventional Shales: J. Heller, R. Hickman, L. Vernik (Ikon Science) (1Terra Laboratories; 2Colorado School of Mines) • Enhanced Geomechanical Modeling Via Incorporation of 3-D Seismic and • Formation Anisotropy and Heterogeneity Evaluation with a High-Resolution a Large Well Database: Delaware Basin Case Study: M . Perz1, A . Ouenes2, LWD Ultrasonic Slowness Imaging Tool: N . Sakiyama1, H . Hori1, H . N . Umholtz2, M . Rauch1 (1TGS; 2FracGeo) Yamamoto1, H . Nakajima1, M . Blyth1, S . M . Fahim Ud Din1, M. G. Kittridge2 (1Schlumberger; 2Occidental Petroleum) Theme 11: Business of Unconventionals: Maximizing Value and Reliability I • GeoSHAP: A Novel Method of a Deriving Rock Quality Index from Machine Chairs: D. N. Valleau, L. Baez Learning Models and Principal Components Analysis: T . Cross, • Maximizing Reliability — Well Integrity Statistics and Risk Reduction K. Sathaye, K. Darnell, J. Ramey, K. Crifasi, D. Niederhut (Novi Labs) Strategies: L . Perello, A . Ichim, C . Blanc, A . Zestran (Tenaris) • Reducing Uncertainty Associated with Resource-in-Place Calculation using • Geologic Variability and Well Productivity in U.S. Oil Plays: The Efficiency Integrated Formation Evaluation, Geostatistical Analysis, and Geological of Completion Intensity and New Designs in Various Geologic Contexts: Modeling — A Case Study in the Midland Basin: A . Rostami1, Z . Heidari1, K. M. Smye, Q. Yang, S. Ikonnikova, E. D. Goodman (University of Texas B . Casey2 (1The University of Texas at Austin Department of Petroleum and at Austin) Geosystems Engineering; 2Bureau of Economic Geology)

Theme 7: Case Studies in IOR/EOR Field Pilots Chairs: T. Firincioglu, H. Kalaei • Compositional Tracking of a Huff-n-Puff Project in the Eagle Ford: A Second Take: M . L . Carlsen1, C . H . Whitson1, M . M . Dahouk1, S . Mydland1, M . Thuesen2, R . Ambrose2 (1Whitson AS; 2EP Energy) • Successful Field Test of Enhancing Bakken Oil Recovery with Propane Injection Part I. Field Test Planning, Operations, Surveillance, and Results: N . N . R . Nagarajan, D . Stoll, M . Litvak, S . R . Prasad, K. Shaarawi (Hess Corp.)

*Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation 35 TUESDAY TECHNICAL PROGRAM

• Seismic Monitoring of an Associated Gas “Huff-n-Puff” for Enhanced Oil Recovery in the Middle Wolfcamp Shale of the Midland Basin, Texas: TUESDAY MORNING – EXHIBIT HALL SESSIONS A. Kumar1, R . Hammack1, A . Bear1, W . Harbert2 (1National Energy Technology Laboratory; 2University of Pittsburgh) Theme 1: Case Studies Highlighting Optimizing Completion, Perforation, • Successful Field Test of Enhancing Bakken Oil Recovery with and Stimulation Strategies Propane Injection Part 2. Development and Application of Innovative Chairs: Y. Liu, S. Szlendak Simulation Technology: M . L . Litvak, N . N . R . Nagarajan, R . S . Prasad, • Case Study: Implemented Anionic Slurried Friction Reducer in High- K. Shaarawi (Hess Corp.) TDS Water Reduces Treating Pressure and Improves Surface Efficiency, Friction Reduction, and the use of Recycled Water: M . Mast1, F . Zamar*2, 2 2 1 2 Theme 3: Mechanical Stratigraphy: Examples from the Field L. Xu , J . Ogle ( Primexx; Halliburton) Chairs: M. Rauch, S. Tuttle • Validation of Fracture Height and Density from Rapid Time-Lapse DAS • Predictive Geologic and Geomechanical Models for Pad Development VSP for use in Calculating Stimulated Rock Volume: A Case Study from 1 2 2 3 in the Delaware Basin: N . M . Umholtz, R . Li, M . Paryani, C . Hammerquist Hereford Field, Colorado: T . L . Inks , X. Zhao , M . E . Willis , E . Jenner 1 2 3 (FracGeo) ( HighPoint Resources; Halliburton; Land Seismic Noise Specialists) • Simulating the Hydraulic Fracture Characteristics of the Bowland Shale • Spatiotemporal Gyration from Microseismicity in the Permian Basin: 1 2 2 2 1 using Mechanical Stratigraphy and Pseudo-Lateral Wells: I . Anderson1, S . Tuttle , V. Grechka , I . Jahan* , Z . Zhang ( Rosehill Resources Inc; 2 J . Ma1, X. Wu2, D . Stow1, D. Griffiths3 (1Institute of GeoEnergy Engineering, Borehole Seismic LLC) Heriot-Watt University; 2British Geological Survey; 3Penrhyn Exploration Ltd) • The Eagle Ford Shale Laboratory: A Field Study of Re-Fracturing, Zipper Fracturing, and Gas-Injection EOR in the Eagle Ford Formation: A . D . Hill1, D . Zhu1, G . Moridis1, J . Correa2, M . D . Zoback3, J . Ajo-Franklin4, J . Renk5, Theme 12: Effective Communications Strategies for Changing Times & O . Ogunsola6, K. Selvan7 (1Texas A&M University; 2Lawrence Berkeley Social Investment and Impacts National Laboratory; 3Stanford University; 4Rice University; 5National Chairs: M. D. Zoback, N. R. Jones Energy Technology Laboratory; 6Department of Energy Headquarters; • Everybody Lies: The Value of Perception vs. Truth in Relation to Social 7Inpex Eagle Ford, LLC) License to Operate: E. Sones (EXERO Well Integrity) • Energy Production Versus Energy Consumption: How do We Bridge the Gap through Effective Communication?: D . I . Ryan1, K. Mills2, L . Hamil3, Theme 2: Rock-Fluid and Fluid-Fluid Interactions II A . Mee4 (1SPE; 2The Crude Audacity; 3Energy360; 4UnionRock) Chairs: Z. Liu, K. Farmer • CO -Fracturing Fluid-Driven Geochemical Alterations at the Shale Matrix- • Economic and Workforce Development in Rural Shale-Based Economies: 2 C . R . Miller (University of Southern Mississippi) Fracture Interface: S. Sanguinito, P. Cvetic, B. Kutchko, S. Natesakhawat, A. Goodman (National Energy Technology Laboratory) • Non-Uniform Etching — The Key for an Effective Acid Fracturing in Shale: Theme 4: Impacts on Well Construction, Design, and Drilling An Experimental Study: W . Wu1, M . Sharma*2 (1University of Texas at Austin, Chairs: J. Kessler, A. Momin Now with Apache Corporation; 2University of Texas at Austin) • Potential Issues with Extreme Limited Entry in Horizontal Wells: • Synchrotron X-Ray Imaging of Reactive Transport in Unconventional R . D . Barree (Halliburton) Shales: V. Noel1, W . Fan1, J . Bargar2, J . Druhan1, A . Jew1, Q. Li1, • Significance of Well Orientation on Cumulative Production from Wells A. Kovscek1, G . Brown1 (1SLAC/Stanford University; 2SLAC) in the Bakken Region: E . Rostami, N . Boness, M . Zoback (Stanford • Effects of Fracturing Fluids on Mechanical Properties in Shales: University) J . C . Acosta, S . T . Dang, C . H . Sondergeld, C . S . Rai (University of Oklahoma) • The Effect of Pressure Cycling on the Development of Micro-Annulus 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 1 • Water Saturation—Myth Busted: V. R. Ravi , T . Dash , B . Chin , S . Ali , M . Ali , in Cement Sheath: S . Salehi , N. Konate , Y . Wu ( Well Construction R . Hartanto2 (1W. D. Von Gonten & Co.; 2W. D. Von Gonten Laboratories) Technology Center; 2Schlumberger Oilfield Services; 3 • Determining Water Saturation of Permian Basin Tight Oil Reservoirs with a University of Oklahoma) New Interpretation Method for Dielectric Dispersion Measurements: N. V. Seleznev1, T . M . Habashy1, E . Rylander2, J . Gendur2, A . Smith3, 3 1 2 Theme 9: Downhole CO2 Separation and Sequestration A . Makowitz ( Schlumberger-Doll Research; Schlumberger; Chairs: M. Fuller, D. Hume, Z. Azmi 3Tap Rock Resources)

• Interpretation of Seismicity Induced by CO2 Sequestration at the Illinois • Impact of Capillary Pressure on Total Porosity and Water Saturation in Basin — Decatur Project: F . Stanek1, S . Williams-Stroud2, V. Turjakov3, Unconventional Shales: F . Cruz1, A . Tinni1, S . Brackeen2, C . Sondergeld1, L . Eisner3 (1IRSM CAS; 2ISGS; 3Seismik s .r .o ). C . Rai1 (1University of Oklahoma; 2Primexx Operating Corporation)

• Pore Structure Analysis from CO2 Saturation using Gas Adsorption: O . Ozotta1, M . Ostadhassan2, K. Liu3, H . Pu1, C . Onwumelu1 (1University of 2 3 Theme 10: International Challenges of Unconventional Resources: North Dakota; Daqing Petroleum Institute; Central Michigan University) Integrated Geoscience and Engineering • How Much Carbon Dioxide can be Stored in Shale Reservoirs and What Chairs: C. Dai, W. W. Wang, B. Hill Factors will Affect the Storage Capacity?: S . Fakher (Missouri University • Geoscience and Engineering Integration Application in One of the of Science and Technology) Biggest Multi-Lateral Pad in Asia for Tight Oil: B . Chen1, F . Ma*2, Z . Feng1, X. Leng1, D . Li1, R . Cui2, Y . Wang1, L . Ding1, Y . Wang1, P . Li1 (1PetroChina Theme 7: Eagle Ford Focused EOR Session Changqing Oilfield Company Tight Oil Project Team; 2Schlumberger) Chairs: T. T. Jiang, B. Bai • The Canning Basin of Western Australia, Discovering Unconventional • Evaluation of Huff-n-Puff in Shale using Experiments and Molecular Opportunity: J. Moore, R. Hull, V. Shelokov, T. Rudge, J. Shields (Black Simulation: S . Mamoudou, F . Perez, A . Tinni, S . Dang, C . Sondergeld, Mountain Oil and Gas) C . Rai, D . Devegowda (University of Oklahoma) • Integrated Design of Rigless Cementation and Completion: An Innovative • Coupled Versus Stratified Flow of Water and Hydrocarbon During Concept to Develop Low-Perm Reservoirs in China: F . Jin (Engineering Flowback and Post-Flowback Processes: Eagle Ford Oil and Gas Case Technology R&D Company Ltd) Studies: H . Dehghanpour1, Y . Fu1, R . Hawkes2 (1University of Alberta; 2Abra Controls Inc .)

36 *Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation

TUESDAY TECHNICAL PROGRAM

• Three-Dimensional Mechanical Compaction and Chemical Compaction Theme 3: Geophysical Reservoir Characterization: Statistical Seismic Simulation of Oligocene Sandstone in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin: Attribute Methods W. Wang, C. Lin, J. Lin, X. Zhang, C. Dong, L. Ren (China University of Chairs: A. Munoz, J. Douma Petroleum) • Shale Gas Sweet Spot Identification using Quantitative Seismic • First Applications of Novel Microproppant to Achieve Optimal Production Interpretation (QSI) and Neural Network in Krishna-Godavari Basin, India: and Enhance Hydraulic Fracture Treatment Placement — A Romanian S . Deshmukh, S . Omer, P . S . Tomar, H . Lal (ONGC Ltd India) Case History: R . Patrascu1, G . Grubac1, P . Saldungaray2, W . Al-Tailji2, • A Multidisciplinary Approach to Inversion Feasibility Analysis for an E . Annovi2 (1OMV Petrom; 2CARBO Ceramics) Unconventional Reservoir Characterization: V. Anantharamu1, Y . Del • Integrated Seismological-Geological-Engineered Steering Technology Moro1, L. Vernik1, A. Quaglia2, E . Carrillo2 (1Ikon Science; 2Inter Rock) Applied to Horizontal Well Drilling: Practice and Application in Fuling • Prediction of 3-D Facies and Petrophysical Models using Seismic Shale Gas Field, China: P . Liao1, D. Xiong2, S . Zha3 (1Yangtze Normal Inversion and Advanced Statistical Data Analytics in Midland Basin Study University; 2Chongqing Environmental Protection Engineering Technology Area: V. Pandey1, T . Nekrasova1, I . Tsybulkina1, K. Clemons2, D . Li1, B . Six1 Center for Shale Gas Development; 3Jianghan Oilfield Branch of SINOPEC) (1CGG; 2Lario Oil & Gas Company) • TBD: Z. Wang (China University of Petroleum, East China) Theme 8: Well Spacing and Well Interference Impact I Theme 7: Flow and Phase Behavior for Tight Oil and Shale Oil/Shale Gas Chairs: F. Male, J. McLaughlin Reservoir Systems • Well-to-Well Interference: Quantifying Connectivity and Understanding Chairs: X. Li, J. Jalali How Much is too Much? A STACK Case Study: T . Ingle, H . Greenwood, • Measurement of Tortuosity in Shales using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: M. Wilkins, M. Almasoodi, K. Haustveit (Devon Energy) Application to Huff-n-Puff EOR: S . Dang, S . Mamoudou, S . Mukherjee, • A Data-Driven Approach to Detect and Quantify the Impact of Frac-Hits C . Sondergeld, C . Rai (University of Oklahoma) on Parent and Child Wells in Unconventional Formations: I . Gupta, C . Rai, • Improved Equation of State Model for Gas Huff-n-Puff EOR Processes in D . Devegowda, C . Sondergeld (University of Oklahoma) Unconventional Reservoirs: G. Yang, X. Li (University of Kansas) • The Impact of Interwell Spacing Over Time — A Machine Learning • Molecular Sieving of Hydrocarbon Mixtures through Nano-Porous Approach: K. Sathaye1, T . Cross1, K. Darnell1, J . Reed2, D . Niederhut1, Membranes: Z. Liu, E. Ozkan, L. Zerpa, X. Yin (Colorado School of Mines) J . Ramey1 (1Novi Labs; 2Enverus)

Theme 7: Important IOR/EOR Concepts Theme 10: Best Practices of Global Unconventional Resources: Integrated Chairs: D. Riestenberg, A. Oudinot Geoscience and Engineering I • A Comparison of Primary Depletion and GCEOR in the Montney Formation Chairs: A. Sloan, Z. Wang, K. Wang Volatile Oil and Rich Gas Condensate: F . B . Thomas1, M . Noroozi2, • Comparative Analysis of Geological Control on Apparent Permeability in M . Piwowar2, W . Gibb2, J . Marin2, R . Apil2, A . White3, D . Royer3 (1Reservoir Key Shale Oil Reservoirs: From North America to Asia Pacific: J. Xu, Optimization Strategies; 2Stratum Reservoir; 3Pipestone Energy Corp .) Y . Su, W . Wang, H . Wang (China University of Petroleum (East China) • Use of Halloysites to Inhibit Surfactant Adsorption onto Reservoir Rock • Workflow for Identifying the Prospective Areas for Frontier Shale Surfaces for Improved Oil Recovery: D . Nguyen1, V. John2, O . Ojo2, Exploration and Prospective Resources Assessment of the Lower Barmer A . Farinmade2 (1Nalco Champion; 2Tulane University) Hill Member of Barmer Hill Formation, Barmer Basin, Rajasthan, India: • An Examination of the Effects of Surface Data Acquisition Methods on . K. Sahoo1, S . Batshas1, T . Dev1, C . T . Wilhelm*2, U. Kuila1, K. Chawla1, Well Performance Evaluations and Completion Optimization: D . Tompkins, S . Sharma1, S . Dasgupta1, A . Mandal1, P . Mishra1 (1Cairn Oil & Gas, Vedanta M. Kerls, O. Adejare (Revo Testing Technologies) Ltd; 2Wilhelm Geoscience Services, LLC) • Optimization Well Spacing for Development of Shale Oil Reservoirs using Integration of Data Analytics, Geomechanics Modeling, Pilots, and TUESDAY AFTERNOON – SESSION ROOMS Economic Analysis: Z . Lei1, X. Li1, K. Dai2, Y . He3, J . Shi3 (1CNPC; 2China University of Petroleum (Beijing); 3Changqing Oilfield of CNPC; Theme 1: New Insights to Hydraulic Fractures Chairs: Y. Liu, R. A. Hull Theme 4: All About the Rock: Lab Measurements and Modeling • Analysis of a Multi-Well Eagle Ford Pilot: K. Raterman, Y. Liu, B. Roy, Chair: A. Ghassemi K. Friehauf, A. Janssen (ConocoPhillips) • Anisotropic and Nonlinear Properties of Rock Samples in the Vaca Muerta Formation: Experimental Measurements and Implications on Theme 2: Drivers for Understanding Reservoir Quality and Completion Reservoir Geomechanics: D . N . Espinoza1, A . Sosa Massaro2, G . Gallardo Quality Giozza1 (1The University of Texas at Austin; 2Instituto Tecnolgico de Chairs: M. Saneifar, A. Posenato Garcia Buenos Aires) • Meramec Velocity Systematics: J . Fu, C . Sondergeld, C . Rai (University of • Determining Static Elastic Anisotropy in Shales from Sidewall Core Oklahoma) Samples: Impact on Stress Prediction and Hydraulic Fracture Modeling: • Geomechanical Heterogeneity within Lithologically Homogeneous Rocks B . Crawford1, Y . Liang1, P . Gaillot2, K. Amalokwu1, X. Wu1, R. Valdez1 of the Triassic Montney Formation II Northeast British Columbia, Canada: (1ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company; 2ExxonMobil Upstream Implications for Fracture Propagation During Stimulations: R . Wust, Business Development) A . Cui, T . Bozarth (AGAT Laboratories) • Macroscopic Modeling of Centimeter-Scale Interfaces using Anisotropic • Diagenetic Controls on Reservoir Character of the Lower Permian Damage Mechanics: P . J . Gaillot1, N . M . Umholtz*2, S . Sanchez2, Wolfcamp and Bone Spring Formations in the Delaware Basin, West C . Hammerquist2, Y . Aimene2, A . Ouenes2 (1ExxonMobil; 2FracGeo) Texas: A . W . Dobber2,1, R . H . Goldstein2,1, (1KICC; 2University of Kansas) • High Resolution Petrophysics and Geomechanics Workflow — The Key • Lower Carboniferous (Mississippian) Facies Heterogeneity and to Optimal Development of Unconventional Reservoirs: P . J . Gaillot Distribution within the Mixed Siliciclastic and Carbonate Reservoirs of (ExxonMobil) the Midcontinent STACK Play, Oklahoma, USA: J . Bynum1, C . Wethington2 • Homogenization of High-Resolution Rock Properties for Hydraulic (1Baker Hughes; 2Oklahoma State University) Fracture Modeling: E. Dontsov, R. Suarez-Rivera (W.D. Von Gonten • Caney Shale and Hydraulic Fracturing of Ductile Shales: M . Achang1, Laboratories) A. Katende1, M . Hugasian1, V. Berkheiser1, C . Ferguson1, G. E. King2, • A Coupled Laboratory Measurement – Machine Learning Workflow to M . Radonjic1 (1Oklahoma State University; 2GEK Engineering) Predict Elastic Anisotrop by Lithotype in Shale: A . Mitra1, J. Kessler2, S . Govindarajan1, D . Gokaraju1, A . Thombare1, A . Guedez1, M . Aldin1 (1MetaRock Laboratories; 2Occidental Oil and Gas Corporation)

38 *Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation Theme 9: New Methods for Subsurface Characterization Theme 5: Oil/Gas/Water: Fluid-Fluid, Fluid-Rock Interactions and Chairs: D. Hume, M. White Chemostratigraphy • Towards a More Accurate Gas-in-Place Model: Reconciling Gas Storage Chairs: J. R. Bargar, A. Jew, O. Woodruff with Gas Production in the Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin, USA: • Rock-Fluid Interaction and its Application in Unconventional Production: D . R . Blood1, S . D . McCallum2, J . Jalali3, A . S . B . Douds4, M . J . Stypula5 W. Wang, W. Wei, D. Leach, C. Yan, K. Spilker (Chevron) (1DRB Geological Consulting; 2McCallum Petrophysics and Data Analytics; • Conditions Controlling Secondary Mineral Growth in Hydraulically 3SRN Petroleum Consulting; 4Parsley Energy; 5Deloitte) Fractured Formations: B . McAdams1,2, J . A . Hakala1 (1National Energy • Understanding the Interplay of Paleo and Present Day In-Situ Stresses in Technology Laboratory; 2Oak Ridge Institute of Science and Education) Austin Chalk WWTH Innovative LWD Borehole Imaging: R . Bradley1, • Strontium Behavior in Midland Basin Unconventional Reservoirs: The C . Shrivastava2, M. Krueger1, D . Haddad1, M . Miranda1, Y-H . Chen2, Importance of Base Fluids: A . Jew1, J . R . Bargar1, J . W . Brownlow2 (1SLAC D . Omeragic2 (1ConocoPhillips; 2Schlumberger) National Accelerator Laboratory; 2Pioneer Natural Resources) • The Geochemistry and Microbial Ecology of Produced Waters from Three • Investigation of Barite Scaling During Reaction Between Pre-Treated Different Unconventional Oil and Gas Regions: D . Gulliver1, D . Lipus2, Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid from the Field and Marcellus Shale: K. Tinker1, D . Ross3, K. Bibby4 (1NETL-DOE; 2German Research Center; W. Xiong1, C . Lopano1, A . Hakala1, B . Carney2 (1National Energy Technology 3Leidos; 4University of Notre Dame) Laboratory; 2Northeast Natural Energy) • A Real-Time Method to Identify Brittle Zones in Carbonate-Rich Mudrocks Using Bulk and Trace Element Geochemistry: A Study in the Theme 6: “Big Data” Applications to Unconventional Reservoirs Eagle Ford, Haynesville, and Niobrara Formations: M . Fonseca, L . Hathon, Chairs: S. Matringe, C. Yang T . Lapen (University of Houston) • Integrating Big Data and Fundamental Studies to Investigate the Impact • Initial Numerical Modeling, Laboratory Testing, and Field Demonstration of Frequent Shut-In on Bakken Well Performance: P . Ye, L . Gong, of a Thermal Breakout Technology for Measuring the In-Situ Stress in the W . Mutoru (Equinor) Deep Subsurface: S. Voegeli, J. Nopola (RESPEC) • Historic Frac Design Evaluation Made Easy: Automating Pumping • A Multiscale Digital Rock Workflow for Shale Matrix Permeability Schedule Recognition from Hydraulic Fracturing Time-Series Data: Prediction: M . Zhang1,2, R . Salazar-Tio1, A . Fager1, B . Crouse1, (1Dassault 2 S . Hoda, J . Iriarte (Well Data Labs) Syst√®mes; The University of Texas at Austin) • Well Performance Prediction in Montney Formation using Machine • Far-Field and Near-Wellbore Geophysical Monitoring with Novel Seismic 1 2 1 2 1 Learning Approaches: H . Rahmanifard, H . Alimohammadi, I . Gates, Contrast Agents: Q. R. Miller , M . Pohl , H . T . Schaef , J . Behura , S . Nune , T . Plaksina (University of Calgary) K. Livo2, M . A . Sinnwell1, M . Prasad2, B . P . McGrail1 (1Pacific Northwest 2 • Estimated Ultimate Recovery using the Digital Analog Shale Model: National Lab; Colorado School of Mines) M . J . Friedel1, R . C . Rechden2, H . T . Schaef1, Q. R. Miller1 (1Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Theme 7: Important IOR/EOR Concepts Institute of Geosciences) Chairs: E. Ozkan, V. Artus • Novel Techniques to Measure Oil-Gas Diffusion at High Pressure and Theme 10: Best Practices of Global Unconventional Resources: Integrated High Temperature Conditions: Application for Huff-N-Puff EOR in Shales: Geoscience and Engineering II S . Mukherjee, S . T . Dang, C . Rai, C . Sondergeld (University of Oklahoma) Chairs: A. Sloan, Z. Wang, K. Wang • Overcoming the Limitations of SRV Concept: M. Gaddipati, C. Karacaer, • Characterization and Calibration of Geomechanical Sweet Spots in the C . Ozgen, T . Firincioglu (NITEC LLC) Silurian Longmaxi Shale Play in the Sichuan Basin: C . Bian1, • Black-Oil and Compositional Simulation of Gas EOR in Tight F . Shen2 (1Sinopec Petroleum Exploration & Production Research Institute; Unconventionals: S . Mydland1, C . H . Whitson2, I . Yusra2, M . L . Carlsen2, 2GeoReservoir Research) M . M . Dahouk2 (1Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU; • Challenges and Opportunities for the Development of Shale Gas in 2Whitson AS) Indonesia: J . T . Simanjuntak1, W . Fisher2, S . Ikonnikova2 (1SKK Migas; 2The University of Texas at Austin) Theme 1: Case Studies Highlighting Optimizing Completion, Perforation, • Understanding the Tectonic Framework of Unconventional Reservoirs in and Stimulation Strategies the Paran Basinu using the Magnetotelluric Method: P . P . de Lugao1, Chairs: Y. Liu, R. A. Hull S . Rolim2, B. F. Kriegshaeuser1 (1Strataimage Consultoria Ltda; • Real-Time Hydraulic Fracture Optimization Based on the Integration 2Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul) 5 of Fracture Diagnostics and Reservoir Geomechanics: J . Glascock • The Mississippian Ambo Shale: A Frontier Tight Oil/Gas Plays in the 1 2 3 4 5 ( Seismos Inc .; Virtex Petroleum Co Inc.; Mueller Exploration; ; NexTier Southern Pacific Margin of Peru: D . Timoteo1, F . Palacios1, G . Chavez1, Completion Solutions) A. Quispe2, L . Pairazaman3 (1Hound Exploration S .A .C .; 2Perupetro S .A .; • Maximizing Project Value in Vaca Muerta Shale Formation — Part 1: 3Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria) Optimizing High Density Completions — Case of Study: A . A . Lerza, S . Cuervo, S . Malhotra (Chevron Corporation) • Quantifying the Parent-Child Effect in Vaca Muerta Formation: P . Crespo, M . Pellicer, C . Crovetto, J . Gait (Pan American Energy) TUESDAY AFTERNOON – EXHIBIT HALL SESSIONS

Theme 3: Geophysical Reservoir Characterization: Seismic Attribute Driven Theme 1: Case Studies Highlighting Optimizing Completion, Perforation, Decision Making and Stimulation Strategies Chairs: J. Douma, A. Munoz Chairs: Y. Pradhan, A. Singh • Unlocking Value from Vintage Seismic Processing—Pre-Stack • A New 3-D Fault Interpretation and Characterization for the Delaware Conditioning and Inversion in the Eagle Ford Shale: A . Munoz1, B . Shea2 Basin: Application for Understanding Recent Seismicity: E . A . Horne, (1Ensign Natural Resources; 2Sharp Reflections) P. H. Hennings, F. Kavoura (Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of • Replacing Conventional Brittleness Indices Determination with Texas at Austin) New Attributes Employing True Hydrofracturing Mechanism: • Optimizing MFHW Completion and Fracturing in Shale Formations R. K. Sharma1, S . Chopra*1, L . Lines2 (1TGS Canada; 2Formerly at Utilizing High Frequency ESP Real-Time Data: L . Camilleri1, D . McEwen1, University of Calgary) D . Weishoff2, T. Kitchen2 (1Schumberger; 2Kraken Oil & Gas) • An Upper Wolfcamp Formation Production Metric Review: C . P . Ross • Identify Optimal Wellbore Landing Zones in the Wolfcamp Formation—The (Cross Quantitative Interpretation, LP) Southern Midland Basin Case Study: H. Xiong, J. Tackett, A. Thompson, M . Schellstede, J . Gibbins, R . Williams (Unversity Lands)

*Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation 39 TUESDAY TECHNICAL PROGRAM

Theme 2: Advances in Formation Evaluation of Unconventional Reservoirs II Theme 7: Gas Injection IOR/EOR Chairs: M. Ashby, S. Perry Chair: M. Manohar • New Generation of Ultra-High Definition Directional Propagation • An Evaluation of Huff-n-Puff Recovery Efficiency of Immiscible and Resistivity for Geosteering and Advanced Formation Evaluation: T . Zhang, Miscible Gases by Integrating Core Tests with NMR and GC Analysis: M. Thiel, K. Sun, D. Omeragic, J. Liu, E. Mirto, Y. Feng, J-M. Denichou, R. Kumar, S. J. Ali, A. Mathur (WD Von Gonten) V. K. Wibowo (Schlumberger) • Evaluation of Cyclic Solvent Injection (‘Huff-n-Puff’) in Artificially • Application of Machine Learning to NMR Measurements in Determining Fractured Shale Core Samples: Experiments and Modeling: Fluid Saturation: S . T . Dang, H . Han*, C . Sondergeld, C . Rai C . R . Clarkson, C . Song, H . Hamdi, A . Ghanizadeh (University of Calgary) (University of Oklahoma) • EOR in Clay-Hosted Pores: Effects of Brine Salinity, Water Saturation, • A New Workflow for Improved Resistivity-Based Water Saturation Pore Surface Chemistry and Pore Width: H. Xiong, D. Devegowda*, Assessment in Organic-Rich Mudrocks: A . Posenato Garcia, P . Huang (University of Oklahoma) L . Hernandez, A . Gonzalez, Z . Heidari* (The University of Texas at Austin) • High Pressure High Temperature Nitrogen Interaction with Crude Oil and its Impact on Asphaltene Deposition During Nitrogen Huff-n-Puff Theme 4: Fracture Modeling and Stimulation Optimization Injection EOR in Shale Oil Reservoirs: An Experimental Study: M . Elturki Chairs: S. Wang, A. Thombare (Missouri University of Science and Technology) • Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Impact of Rock-Fluid Interaction Induced Proppant Embedment on Fracture Conductivity: M . Fan1, Z . Li1, Y . Han2, Y . Teng1, C . Chen1 (1Virginia Tech; 2Aramco Services Company) • The Case for Engineered Completions: A Case Study of the Marcellus Shale Energy and Environmental Lab (MSEEL): R . Bohn1, M . Rios-Lopez2 (1University of North Dakota; 2Instituto Tecnolgico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey) • Numerical Study of Proppant Transport and Distribution along Opened Bedding Planes: J . Tang1, S . Sun1, L . Zhang1, J. Xie2 (1Harvard University; 2Petrochina Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company)

Theme 7: Reservoir Modeling for Unconventionals – Bringing Together Data, Disciplines, and Design Chairs: G. Koperna, H. Evans • Profit Optimization from Fracture Design and Production Estimates: D . Cotrell, T . Hoeink, E . Odusina, S . Ghorpade, E . Bernsen (Baker Hughes) • Modeling Energized Fluids for Stimulation and Production in Fractured Reservoirs: M . Jammoul, M . Wheeler (The University of Texas at Austin)

Theme 9: Novel Proppants, Lower Environmental Impact Fluids, and Additives Chair: L. Shen • TDS-Tolerant, Low-Damaging, Crosslinked Friction Reducer Fracturing Fluid for Deeper Unconventional Wells: L . Song1, Y. Xiong2, D . Schreckengost1 (1CNPC USA Corp; 2PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas Field Company) • Impact of Proppant Pumping Schedule on Well Production for Slickwater Fracturing: S. Mao, P. Siddhamshetty, Z. Zhang, W. Yu, T. Chun, K. Wu (Texas A&M University)

• Improving CO2– EOR in Shale Reservoirs using Dilute Wettability-Altering Additives: F . Haeri1, L . Burrows1, P . Shah2, D . Tapriyal1, R . Enick1, A . Goodman1 (1National Energy Technology Laboratory; 2University of Pittsburgh) • Effect of Acid Etching on Surface Topography, Mechanical Properties, and Fracture Conductivity in Shale: W . Wu1, M . Sharma2 (1University of Texas, now with Apache Corporation; 2 University of Texas)

Theme 4: Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing and Production Drawdown on Well Productivity Chair: N. Espinoza • Ultra-Fast Modeling for Hydraulic Fracturing and Depletion: E . Dontsov, B. Abell, Y-K. Yang, C. Quinn, R. Suarez-Rivera* (W.D. Von Gonten Laboratory) • Distinguishing Fracture Conductivity and Fracture Flux: A Systematic Investigation of Individual Fracture Contribution to Well Productivity: A. Khanal, R. Weijermars (Texas A&M University) • New Experimental Methods to Study Proppant Embedment in Shales: E . Alagoz, H . Wang, R . T . Russell, M . M . Sharma (The University of Texas at Austin) • Well Completion Optimization for Permian Basin Based on Integrated Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Simulation Study: L . Wang, A . Sun (The University of Texas at Austin)

40 *Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation AUTOMATED FRAC EQUIPMENT™

IMAGINE A FRAC SPREAD THAT IS SET UP IN HOURS, NOT DAYS, WHERE CREWS MONITOR DATA, NOT LEAKS. THIS IMAGINE AN INNOVATION SO BIG, ITS SAFETY AND EFFICIENCY IMPACT IS FELT ACROSS THE ENTIRE PAD.. IT IS HERE, AND ITS GOING TO BE BIG. IS RENEGADE SERVICES CONTINUES ITS TRADITION OF BRINGING INNOVATION TO THE RIG SITE WITH THE NEXT GENERATION OF AUTOMATED FRAC EQUIPMENT. COME BIG LEARN MORE AT URTEC BOOTH #1250.

FracScorpion™ 7” monobore

7” RigLock®

Image source: FHE, USA.

Sales: (281) 336-8909 NOW ON LOCATION Live demo: vimeo.com/renegadewls ONLY WITH URTeC 2020 Booth #1250

Theme 4: Fracture Modeling and Stimulation Optimization WEDNESDAY MORNING – SESSION ROOMS Chairs: G. Han, S. Borchardt • Permeability Increase by Shear Slip During Shale Reservoir Stimulation: Theme 1: Stacked Pay Development Strategies/Well Spacing to Field Z . Ye1, A . Ghassemi1, L . Ji2, V. Sen2, J . Mailloux2 (1The University of Development Oklahoma; 2Occidental Petroleum Corporation) Chairs: J. Alvarez, B. Kurtoglu • Logic and Data Necessitating a Paradigm Shift for the Role of Natural • Multidisciplinary Cube Design for Uinta Basin Stacked Play: T-S . Ong, Fractures in Hydraulically Stimulated Resource Plays: B . Stephenson1, L . John, T . Pedersen (Encana Corp) G . Ugueto2 (1Shell Canada; 2SEPCO) • Bakken Infill Pilot Analysis and Modeling: Characterizing Unconventional • Auto-Optimization of Hydraulic Fracturing Design with Three- Reservoir Potentials: Y . Liu, S . Bordoloi, N . McMahan, J . Zhang, Dimensional Fracture Propagation in Naturally Fractured Multi-Layer B . Rajappa, H . Long, E . Michael (ConocoPhillips) Formations: J . Wang, J . E . Olson (The University of Texas at Austin) • Hydraulic Fracture Height Growth at The Hydraulic Fracturing Test Site: Theme 2: High and Low Field NMR Applications J . Huang, P . Fu, J . Morris, R . Settgast, F . Ryerson (Lawrence Livermore Chair: H. Wang National Laboratory) • Unconventional Reservoir Water Saturation Quantification with NMR and • Use of Stranded Natural Gas as a Fracturing Fluid: Technical and Resistivity Logging: W . Shao, S . Chen, R . Balliet (Halliburton) Economic Feasibility: S . Zheng1, M . M . Sharma1, D . P . Gala2 (1The • NMR Time-Lapse Wettability Assessments in Unconventionals: Insights University of Texas at Austin; 2ExxonMobil) from Imbibition: S. Kelly1, R . J . M . Bonnie1, M . J . Dick2, D. Veselinovic2 • Fracture Network to Production — Direct Evidence from the Hydraulic (1ConocoPhillips; 2Green Imaging Technologies) Fracturing Test Site (HFTS) #1, Midland Basin, West Texas: S . Wang, • Organic Shale Spontaneous Imbibition in Competing Fluids and Y. Tan, A. Singh, P. Rijken, J. Acuna, B. Liang, S. Khan, C. Lannen, Monitoring with NMR to Evaluate Wettability, Molecular Sieving, and D . Forand (Chevron) Restoring Core Saturation to In-Situ Conditions: M . Ali, A . Mathur, S . Ali, • A Semi-Analytical Modeling Approach for Hydraulic Fracture Initiation C. Belanger (WD Von Gonten Laboratories) and Orientation in Shale Reservoirs: A . Michael, I . Gupta • A New Methodology to Evaluate Huff-n-Puff Effectiveness at In-Situ (Louisiana State University) Conditions: J . E . Moore1,2, D . M . Crandall1, S . Workman1,3, (1Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory; 2Leidos Research Support Theme 9: Integrated Diagnostic Workflows to Identify Fracture Geometry Team; 3USSE2) Chairs: B. Ward, P. Lembcke • State-of-the-Art in Characterization of Frac Stage Geometry and Theme 3: Stratigraphic and Structural Characterization of Unconventional Conductivity Using Post-Fracture Pressure Leakoff: M . Mohamed1, 2 1 1 2 Reservoirs M . Ibrahim , E . Ozkan ( Colorado School of Mines; Apache Corp) Chairs: S. Sonnenberg, M. Poole • Applied Statistics Combining Pressure Based Fracture Maps and Post • Structure and Stratigraphic Architecture of the Southeast Delaware Stimulation Leak Off for Informed Unconventional Development: Basin: A . Z . Calle, E . A . Horne, H . S . Hamlin, D . Carr (Bureau of Economic D. Lerohl, S. Spicer, E. Coenen, J. Mayorga, B. Vering (Reveal Energy Services) Geology, The University of Texas at Austin) • Controls On Sediment Routing and Influence on Unconventional Theme 12: Resources, Effective Communication, and Social License Reservoir Distribution in the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring Formations, to Operate Northern Delaware Basin, West Texas and Southeast New Mexico: Chairs: M. D. Zoback, N. R. Jones B . Price1, X. Janson2, C. Kerans1, R . Dommisse2 (1The University of Texas at • Predicting Water Production in the Williston Basin using a Machine Austin; 2Bureau of Economic Geology) Learning Model: T. Cross, K. Sathaye, K. Darnell, D. Niederhut, K. Crifasi • Impact of Regional and Local Tectonics on the Vaca Muerta Play: (Novi Labs) O . J . Ortega, L . Zhou, D . Minisini, D . Samake, M . Poole, L . Baez (Shell) • Results of the 2019 USGS Water and Proppant Assessment Associated • Carrier Bed (halo) Play in the Cretaceous Turonian Turner Sandstone, with Petroleum Production From the Eagle Ford Group, Texas: Crossbow Field Area, Powder River Basin: S . Sonnenberg (Colorado N. Gianoutsos, S. Haines, B. Varela, K. Whidden (U.S. Geological Survey) School of Mines) • Using Drone-Mounted Geophysical Sensors to Map Legacy Oil and Gas Infrastructure: R . W . Hammack1, G. Veloski1, M . Schlagenhauf2, R . Lowe3, Theme 8: Well Spacing and Well Interference Impact II A . Zorn4, L . Wylie5 (1U .S . Dept . of Energy–National Energy Technology Chairs: Y. Pradhan, C. Virues, B. Yuan Laboratory; 2Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission; 3Ohio Dept . • Feeling the Pressure on Infill Development: T . Lopez1, R . Stocking2, of Natural Resources; 4DiGioia Gray Consultants and Engineers; S . Young2, P . Morton2 (1Occidental Petroleum Corporation; 2Deep Imaging) 5UAV Exploration) • New Engineering and Geologic Parameters to Predict Infill Well Performance • Unconventional Gas and Hydrogen: Win-Win?: D . N . Meehan in the Wolfcamp of the Delaware Basin: A . Gherabati, (Gaffney Cline) K. Smye, G. McDaid, S. Hamlin (Bureau of Economic Geology) • Evaluating Refrac Economic Potential and Primary-Infill Relative Well Theme 11: Business of Unconventionals: Maximizing Value and Reliability II Performance in Permian Organic Shales: R . Barba1, J . Stroder1, Chairs: D. Valleau, L. Baez M. Villarreal2 (1Integrated Energy Services Inc; 2Enventure Global Technology) • Optimal Well Spacing in all Key Areas of the Permian Basin by Landing • The Effects of Infill Drilling on Midterm Well Productivity — A Montney Case Zone: A . Ramos-Peon, A . Abramov (Rystad Energy) Study: M . Popp (Geologic Systems Ltd) • Benchmarking Operator Performance in the Williston Basin using a Predictive Machine Learning Model: T. Cross, K. Sathaye, K. Darnell, Theme 6: Integration of Numerical Models and Data Science in Reservoir D. Niederhut, K. Crifasi (Novi Labs) Characterization • Nanoparticle Sorbent Technology for Valuable Metal Extraction from Chairs: S. Mishra, D. L. Lougheed Produced Waters: B . P . McGrail, M . A . Sinnwell, J . Liu, H . T . Schaef*, • Machine-Learning-Assisted Segmentation of FIB-SEM Images with Q. R. Miller, P. Thallapally (PNNL) Artifacts for Improved of Pore Space Characterization of Tight Reservoir Rocks: K. Simonov2,1, A. Kazak*2, V. Kulikov3,2, (1Schlumberger Moscow Research; 2Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech); 3PicsArt Inc ). • Hybrid Modeling for Unconventional Field Development — Delaware Basin Case Study: J . Park, A . Datta-Gupta (Texas A&M University) • Integration of Data Science and Physical Models to Characterize the Combined Effect of Completion and Spacing: R . Cao (Shell)

42 *Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation WEDNESDAY TECHNICAL PROGRAM

43 WEDNESDAY TECHNICAL PROGRAM

Theme 2: Emerging Petrophysical and Core Data Evaluations Chairs: S. Mukherjee, A. S. Knaup, V. Montoya WEDNESDAY MORNING – EXHIBIT HALL SESSIONS • Permeability Measurements on Shales using NMR Spectroscopy: S . Ali1, A . Mathur*1, C . Barnes1, C . Belanger1, J . Treadwell2, B . Chin1 (1WDVG Theme 3: New Technologies and Techniques in Geophysics Laboratories; 2WDVG Co) Chairs: A. Munoz, M. Rauch • Advanced Geochemical Volatiles Analysis of Drill Cuttings to Drive • Estimation of Orthorhombic Elastic Properties of Thinly Laminated Rocks Decisions from Single Well Completions to Acreage/Basin Assessments: using Plane and Point Transducers in Cylindrical Samples: G . Gallardo Examples from the Permian, Stack, and Scoop: M . Smith, C . Smith* Giozza1, D . N . Espinoza1, C. Torres-Verdn1, E . Maalouf2 (1The University of (Advanced Hydrocarbon Stratigraphy) Texas at Austin; 2American University of Beirut) • Investigation of Fluid Desiccation and Redistribution in Fresh • Enhancing PSDM via Well Data Derived from Gradient Boosted Trees Unconventional Tight Rocks using 2-D NMR Mapping Techniques: Machine Learning: M . Rauch, M . Perz, S . Namasivayam, A . Sharma (TGS) L. Sloan, K. Farmer, H. Xie (Core Laboratories) • Seismic Quantitative Analysis for Physical-Based Deep Learning: The Teapot Dome and Niobrara Shale Examples: N . Martin (CLS GeoSolutions LLC) Theme 2: Rock-Fluid and Fluid-Fluid Interactions I Chairs: Z. Fan, S. Luo Theme 3: Source Rock Characterization • Insights into Salinity Variations for Waterfloods, Frac-Fluids and Drilling Chairs: T. Ochmanski, R. Tscherny Mud in Clay-Hosted Pores using Molecular Simulations: H. Xiong, • Controls on Stratigraphic Evolution and Distribution of Organic Carbon D . Devegowda* (University of Oklahoma) Content and Type in the Reservoir Shale of the Lower Permian Whitehill • The Effect of Heterogeneous Wetting Distributions on Multiphase Formation of South Africa: K. Chukwuma1, H . Tsikos1, N . Wagner2 Displacement in Fractures: E . Guiltinan1, J . Santos2, Q. Kang1 (1Los (1Rhodes University; 2University of Johannesburg) Alamos National Lab; 2University of Texas at Austin) • Geological Controls of the Organic-Inorganic Distributions within • Hypersaline Flow Back Water: What it Tells Us about Shale Gas Reservoir the Woodford Shale in Oklahoma USA: Integrating for Finding the Properties: C . Palencia, L . Hathon, M . Myers (University of Houston) Unconventional Sweet Spots: E . J . Torres, A . Liborius-Parada, S . Sinha, R. Slatt, K. J. Marfurt (University of Oklahoma) Theme 8: Well Spacing and Well Interference Impact III • Characterization of Organic Facies, Paleogeography, and Thermal Chairs: Y. Pradhan, C. Virues, B. Yuan Maturity of Early Leonardian-Aged Strata, Martin County, Texas: 1,2 2 1 • A Fast Workflow for Uncertainty Assessment of Well Spacing and Pad J . P . Murtaugh , M. K. Zobaa , ( Endeavor Energy Resources; 2 Sequence in the Permian Basin: G . Dashti, B . Liang (Chevron North University of Texas Permian Basin) America Exploration and Production) • Organic Matter Type Identification and Thermal Maturity Estimation 1 2 1 • Frac-Hit Dynamic Modeling using Artificial Intelligence and Machine using Raman Microscopy: L . A . Hathon , Z . Liu , M . T . Myers 1 2 Learning: S. Mohaghegh (West Virginia University) ( University of Houston; Halliburton)

Theme 3: Reservoir Monitoring and Well Spacing I Theme 6: Applications of Machine Learning in Unconventional Reservoirs Chair: C. Schultz Chairs: B. Thomas, L. Bermudez • Unraveling Contributing Fractures Based upon Flowing Material Balance • Field Development Strategy using Mixed Data Sources: An Application and Stress Analysis: P . M . Moradi, D . Angus (ESG Solutions) of Data Analytics to Eagleford Development: A. Selveindran, P. Chen • Evaluating the Impact of Precision Targeting on Production in the (University of Houston) Midland Basin using Machine Learning Algorithms: T . Cross1, J . Reed2, • A Data-Driven Workflow for Optimizing Shut-In Strategies of Adjacent K. Sathaye*1, K. Darnell1, K. Crifasi1, D . Niederhut1 (1Novi Labs; 2Enverus) Wells During Multi-Stage Hydraulic Fracturing Operations: A . Shahkarami, H. Stephenson, R. Klenner, G. Murrell (Baker Hughes) • Basin-Specific Machine Learning Models for Efficient Completions Theme 9: Innovative Technologies to Reduce Completions Costs I Optimization: C. R. De Sario, A. Bogdan, D. Fu, S. Khan (BJ Services, LLC) Chairs: G. Norton, S. Schroeder, J. Thompson • Innovative Method to Inject Solid Particulate Diverters from Surface During Fracturing: M. Hajjari, R. Shampine, C. Urdaneta, A. Keilers, Theme 8: EUR and Performance Prediction: Decline Curve Analysis and A . Dunaeva (Schlumberger) Beyond III • Robust Event Recognition in Real Time Hydraulic Fracturing Data for Live Chairs: Z. Chen, P. Sainani, D. T. Vo Reporting and Analysis: J . Iriarte, S . Hoda (Well Data Labs) • Numerical Multi-Phase and Multi-Well Rate Transient Analysis • Optimizing Microproppant Placement using Available Drilling Data – Considering Complex Fracture Networks: Case Studies from Permian A Case History: T. Palisch, B. Davidson, K. Shah, W. Al-Tailji Basin: J. Qin, K. Sepehrnoori (The University of Texas at Austin) (CARBO Ceramics, Inc .) • Deriving Time-Dependent Scaling Factors for Completions Parameters in the Williston Basin using a Multi-Target Machine Learning Model and Theme 4: Geomechanics for Well Spacing and Stacking Shap Values: T. Cross, D. Niederhut, K. Sathaye, K. Darnell*, K. Crifasi Chairs: H. Pourpak, K. Huffman, A. K. Kamali (Novi Labs) • Optimizing Well Spacing and Sequencing for Cube Development Projects • Multi-Segment Hyperbolic Model Improves Production Forecasts in in the Delaware Basin: A . Damani, R . Malpani* (Schlumberger) Permian Basin Volatile Oil Wells: B . C . Sherman, J . Lee (Texas A&M • Completion Optimization for Unconventional Wells in Multilayer University) Environment: S . Gao1, S. Krishnamurthy1, J . Jimenez2, J . Ayoub2, • An Integrated Multi-Disciplinary Modeling and Simulation Approach to M . Thambynayagam1 (1Maxeur LLC; 2Emerson) History Matching and Forecasting Shale Wells — An Eagle Ford Case • Investigation of Poor Child Well Performance in the Meramec Stack Play, Study: U . Aslam, R . Bordas (Emerson Automation Solutions) Anadarko Basin: N. Li, K. Wu, J. Killough (Texas A&M University)

44 *Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation

WEDNESDAY TECHNICAL PROGRAM

Theme 3: Integrated Geophysical and Geologic Modeling Theme 2: Emerging Petrophysical and Core Data Evaluations II Chairs: A. Munoz, M. Rauch Chairs: S. Mukherjee, A. S. Knaup, V. Montoya • Optimizing Eagle Ford Development through Integrated Earth • Estimation of In-Situ Wettability using Multi-Frequency Electromagnetic Modeling: R. Kommaraju (Penn Virginia Oil & Gas) Measurements: Y . Jin1, S . Misra*1, D . Homan2 (1Texas A&M University; • Improved TOC and Lithology Prediction for Wolfcamp Shales using 2Schlumberger) AVO Attribute Analysis: J . Lee1, U . Y . Lim2, D . Lumley1 (1University of Texas • A New Petrophysical Model Explaining Shale Resistivity Anomalies by at Dallas; 2Chevron Energy Technology Company (formerly, Texas A&M Wettability: A. V. Kazak1, B . N . Enikeev2 (1Skolkovo Institute of Science and University) Technology; 2Pangea Ltd .) • Predicting Fluvial Reservoir Facies by Upscaling Seismic Inversion with • Advanced Joint Interpretation of Image Logs and Conventional Well Logs 3-D Geocellular Modeling: Pinedale Field Case Study: S. K. Logan1, in Organic-Rich Mudrock Formations for Improved Formation Evaluation: E . LaBarre1, C . Dorian2, P . R . Clarke1, M . Ahmed3, A . Hartley4 Application to the Permian Basin: A . Gonzalez, Z . Heidari* (The University (1Ultra Petroleum; 2Schlumberger; 3CGG; 4University of Aberdeen) of Texas at Austin)

Theme 3: Geological and Reservoir Characterization of Theme 2: Pressure Transient Testing, DFIT, and Well Testing Unconventional Plays Chairs: T. Jiang, C. G. Glaser, C. Chen Valdes Chairs: E. Ay, D. Maity • Miscible Fluid Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test Design Enabling • Proximal to Distal Variability of Mississippian Lithofacies, Depositional Permeability Estimation from Before-Closure Linear Flow: Environments, Diagenetic Processes, and Reservoir Quality within C . A . Ehlig-Economides, M . Bychina, G . Liu (University of Houston) a Mixed Siliciclastic-Carbonate System, Eastern Anadarko Basin, • Analysis of Fracture Injection Tests using Signal Processing Approach: Oklahoma, USA: F . Suriamin, M . J . Pranter (School of Geoscience) M . Mansi1, M . M . Awad1, A . Rezaei1, F . Siddiqui1, B . Dindoruk2, M . Soliman1 • Comparison of Wireline Log and SEM Image-Based Measurements of (1University of Houston; 2Shell International Exploration and Production, Porosity in Overburden Shale: C . J . Landry1, B . Hart2, M . Prodanoviƒá1 Inc & University of Houston) (1University of Texas at Austin; 2Equinor) • Field Trials of a Pump-In/Flowback DFIT for Accelerated Estimates of • Characterization of Three Forks Formation Reservoir Lithofacies in the Closure and Reservoir Pressure and Reservoir Productivity: B . Zanganeh, Williston Basin, North Dakota: A . Adeyilola1, S . Nordeng2, C . Onwumelu2, C . Clarkson (University of Calgary) O . Tomomewo2 (1Central Michigan University; 2University of North Dakota) Theme 8: Well Spacing and Well Interference Impact II Theme 6: Workflows for Disparate Data Sets Chairs: Y. Pradhan, C. Virues, B. Yuan Chairs: R. Ratnakar, P. Lembcke • Minimizing Fracture-Driven Interaction Risks in the Wolfcamp A — • Transfer Learning for Scalable Optimization of Unconventional Field Delaware Basin: T. Krolczyk, B. Nealon (Enverus Drillingfo) Operations: H. Klie, B. Yan, A. Klie (DeepCast.ai) • Case Study: Parent-Child Wells Offset Distance in Eagle Ford, How Far is • Managing Well Design and Planning Workflows in Digital Well Programs Economically Right?: M. X. Fiallos Torres, W. Yu, J. Miao (Sim Tech) using Hash-Pointer-Linked Lists: P. Kowalchuk (Halliburton) • A New Methodology to Determine Well Spacing in Unconventional Reservoirs — Delaware Basin Case Study: D . Alfred, A . Lundy Theme 5: Geochemistry Meets EOR (Scala Energy LLC) Chairs: L. Warren, F. Liu • Proper Parenting with Newborns — A Fluid Tracking Case Study: • A Novel Pressure-Based Experimental Method for Quantifying Oil R . Stocking, S . Young, D . Jones (Deep Imaging) Swelling Based on Real Gas Equation of State: S . Fakher1, H . Abdelaal2, A . Imqam1 (1Missouri University of Science and Technology; Theme 3: Reservoir Monitoring and Well Spacing II 2University of Lisbon) Chair: C. Schultz • Microscopic Study of Wettability Alteration and Imbibition Enhancement • Fracture Characterization and Flow Profiling with Distributed with Liquid Nanofluids for Enhanced Oil Recovery in Tight Sandstones: Temperature Sensing: H. Sun, W. Yu, K. Sepehrnoori (The University of X. Liang, T. Liang, F. Zhou, S. Yuan (China University of Petroleum at Beijing) Texas at Austin) • Oil-Water Two-Phase Flow Behavior in Shale Inorganic Nanopores: From • Increasing Understanding of Cross-Well Communication in Molecule Level to Theoretical Mathematical Model: S . Zhan2,1, Y . Su1, Z . Unconventional Reservoirs from Multiple Downhole Diagnostics: Jin2, W . Wang1, L . Li1, (1China University of Petroleum ÔºàEast ChinaÔºâ; N. Verkhovtseva, J. Wilson (Halliburton) 2University of Alberta) • Muon Tomography for Characterization and Monitoring of Unconventional Reservoirs: S . Pieczonka1, A . Braun1, D . Schouten2 (1Queen’s University; 2CRM Geotomography Technologies) WEDNESDAY AFTERNOON – SESSION ROOMS Theme 4: Infill Drilling and Refracturing: Applications and Lessons Learned Theme 1: Case Studies of Game-Changing Results Chairs: H. Pourpak, K. Huffman, A. K. Kamali Chairs: H. Sun, J. Lassek • The Influence of Development Target Depletion on Stress Field Changes • Extended Laterals: Case Study Purple Hayes 1H, The Game Changer of Upside Target in Permian Basin with Complex Natural Fractures: Well that Paved the Way on Extended Laterals: D . U . Oelkers (Montage Y. Pei, W. Yu, K. Sepehrnoori (The University of Texas at Austin) Resources) • Can a Cube Model Mitigate Parent-Child Effects and Improve Oil • Fortin De Piedra Block Case Study. Factory Mode Development in the Recovery in the Permian Basin?: Q. Yan, T. Xu (Schlumberger) Vaca Muerta Formation: P . Biscayart, F . Bardelli, M . Brolli, J . d’Hiriart*, • Development of a Pore Pressure Workflow and Multi-Variate Depletion D. Garcia Acebal, A. Giachino, S. Olmos, N. Requena, R. Varela, M. Flag for Horizontal Child Wells in the Eagle Ford Formation: R . Grande1, Hoffmann, D. Valencio (Tecpetrol) T . Levon*2, B . Warren3 (1Sundance Energy; 2Fracture ID; 3Crown • Stage-Level Data Integration to Evaluate Fracturing Behavior of Geochemistry, Inc .) Horizontal Wells at the Hydraulic Fracturing Test Site: An Insight to The Production Performance: S . Salahshoor, D . Maity, J . Ciezobka (Gas

Technology Institute)

46 *Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation WEDNESDAY TECHNICAL PROGRAM

Theme 9: Innovative Technologies to Reduce Completions Costs II Chairs: G. Norton, S. Schroeder, J. Thompson • Novel Sulfide Scale Inhibitor Successfully Averts Challenging Sulfide Scale Deposition in Permian and Williston Unconventional Basins: C . Okocha, A . Thornton, J . Wylde (Clariant Corporation) • Intervention Based Distributed Fiber Optics Allows for a Systematic Evaluation of Diverters, Limited Entry, and HVFR Fluids in the Northwest Stack Play: A . Attia (Ziebel) • Utilizing Cloud-Based Computing to Avoid Over or Under Engineering Completions: C . De Paulo, D . Guerra, J . Y . Deng, C . Brunette, M . B . Smith (NSI Technologies)

Theme 4: Impacts on Well Construction, Design and Drilling Chairs: J. Kessler, A. Momin, W. Wang • Casing Deformation During Hydraulic Fracturing: Root Causes, Prevention, and Mitigation Solutions: H . Pourpak, M . Mohamed TOTAL SA) • A Novel Loss Circulation Material Strategy Utilizing Shaped Loss Circulation Materials for Unconventional Fields: M . AlArfaj, M . Amanullah, R . Alouhali (Saudi Aramco)

*Denotes presenter other than first author |Green icon denotes a team presentation 47 URTeC EVENTS APP

Download the URTeC Events App for FREE Available for both iOS and Android devices, the URTeC Events App allows you access to all the conference information and details in the palm of your hand. Download for free today!

• View all the individual sessions, presentations, and events • See the entire exhibitor list and schedule appointments in real time • Navigate the exhibit hall with the interactive floor map • Find general event information, times, and locations • Turn on push notifications to stay connected with real time updates • Best of URTeC Awards – Vote on your favorite presentations to help select the top paper from each session . Never Miss a Moment.

CODE OF CONDUCT The Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC) is conference and at all conference events, whether officially sponsored by conducted for the benefit of its members and interested parties to advance URTeC or not . the science of geology, geophysics, and engineering, to promote technology, and facilitate networking and collaboration between professionals . URTeC If a participant engages in behavior that violates this code of conduct, values the participation of its members and guests and wants all URTeC URTeC reserves the right to take any action deemed appropriate, including attendees to have an enjoyable and fulfilling experience. warning the offender(s) or expelling the offender(s) from the convention with no refund. URTeC’s complete anti-harassment policy can be found at: Accordingly, URTeC is dedicated to providing a harassment-free conference URTeC org/2020/Code-of-Conduct. . experience for everyone, regardless of gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, or religion . We do not tolerate Reporting harassment of conference participants in any form . All attendees are If you have any questions or concerns, please communicate with us expected to show respect and courtesy to other attendees throughout the anonymously at www urt. ec org. /carereport

48 More Than A Motor Company

CUSTOM ENGINEERING Thru Tubing Solutions has the SOLUTIONS most comprehensive suite of tools and services for next-level TCP/ ABRASIVE operational efﬁciency. PERFORATING Support operations that once required multiple points of contact are now FISHING & available from a single company. RENTAL SERVICES TTS brings together focused combinations of technical expertise, innovative tools and proprietary technologies to provide immediate access to PROPRIETARY the resources you need to CHEMICALS optimize operations for any well phase.

MILLING & CLEANOUT SERVICES

SLICFRAC® ZONAL ISOLATION TECHNOLOGY

www.ThruTubing.com

Thru Tubing Solutions is more than a motor company. EXHIBITION

• Exhibition Highlights • Exhibitors • Exhibition Floor Plan • U-Pitch Technology Showcase EXHIBITION HIGHLIGHTS

Now more than ever businesses and social connectivity is particularly important during challenging times . That’s why Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC) in Austin remains critical to you, your colleagues and your business . URTeC is your best opportunity to showcase your brand, exchange information, and formulate strategic ideas to solve problems and amplify your brand’s presence .

URTeC Delivers • A unique opportunity to view an Exhibit Hall Presentations • Targeted, qualified, multi-disciplinary group of prospects connecting on all things unconventional • Unprecedented reach from the combined resources of 12 of the world’s leading geoscience and engineering professional societies • High visibility, integrated, cross-discipline platform to showcase products and services to the largest, qualified and most significant network of buyers and developers of new technologies, products and services • U-Pitch Technology Showcase

EXHIBIT HALL HIGHLIGHTS

Monday, 20 July Tuesday, 21 July Wednesday, 22 July • Refreshment Breaks at 10:00a and 3:00p • Refreshment Breaks at 10:00a and 3:00p • Refreshment Break at 10:00a • U-Pitch Technology Showcase at 10:00a • U-Pitch Technology Showcase at 10:00a • U-Pitch Technology Showcase at 10:00a • Exhibit Hall Presentations all-day • Exhibit Hall Presentations all-day • Exhibit Hall Presentations all morning • Opening Reception at 5:00p • Networking Reception at 5:00p

EXHIBITION HOURS

Monday, 20 July Tuesday, 21 July Wednesday, 22 July 10:00a–7:00p 9:00a–6:00p 9:00a–1:00p

BOOK YOUR EXHIBIT SPACE Book your space now to be part of the most relevant, multidisciplinary event for unconventional resource development . URTeC’s unique, integrated and collaborative platform is vital for the continued innovation and advancement of U .S . and global resource plays . It is here where you can showcase your company’s products and service to thousands of URTeC attendees, reaching scientists and executives seeking solutions and new ideas . Become a key player and join the industry’s elite by aligning your company with a high-quality, science technology forum developed by an interdisciplinary program committee .

Mike Taylor Tracy Thompson Companies A–K Companies L–Z +1 918 630. 5672. +1 918 560. 9414. mtaylor@URTeC org. tthompson@URTeC org.

51 EXHIBITORS (AS OF 7 MAY)

Actenum Corporation ...... 947 Geologix ...... 1245 Revo Testing Technologies, LLC ...... 1151 Advanced BioCatalytics Corporation ...... 1633 GeoMark Research ...... 1515 RevoChem, LLC ...... 323 ANSYS, Inc ...... 1707 Geomechanica, Inc ...... 1051 Ridgeway Kite Software ...... 210 Apex Petroleum Engineering ...... 831 Geophysical Society of Houston ...... 1510. Rock Flow Dynamics ...... 509 Aramco Services Company ...... 1013 GeoSteering Solutions, Inc ...... 415 Rockfield Software, Ltd...... 738 Baker Hughes ...... 613 Getech ...... 633 Rogii, Inc ...... 1623 Battelle Memorial Institute ...... 1815 Golder Associates ...... 1340 Rose & Associates, LLP ...... 1730 BHL Consulting, Inc ...... 1036 Green Imaging Technologies ...... 402 RPS Group ...... 522 Biodentify ...... 837 Haimo America, Inc ...... 1539 RS Energy Group ...... 523 Biota Technology ...... 1242 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc ...... 914 RTC Lab ...... 1411 Bruker Corporation ...... 1033. . Hart Energy ...... 1528. . Ruths ai...... 425 Buffalo Head Energy Services ...... 602 Horizontal Wireline Services ...... 1406. SAExploration ...... 1813 Calsep, Inc ...... 423 HSI Geosciences ...... 1142 Saga Wisdom, Inc ...... 1709 Canamera Coring ...... 936 Hydrocarbon Data Systems, Inc ...... 530 Schlumberger ...... 1123, 1122 CGG ...... 1423 IHS Markit Ltd ...... 1213 Seismos, Inc ...... 607 Chemostrat ...... 1138. . Ikon Science Ltd ...... 1523 Selman & Associates, Ltd ...... 1139 Chinook Consulting Services ...... 1731 Impac Exploration Services ...... 501 Shale Oil Tools ...... 937 ClampOn, Inc ...... 1607 Impact Selector ...... 531 Shale Value, LLC ...... 635 Clean Chemistry, Inc ...... 1506 Infrastructure Networks, Inc ...... 302 ShaleProfile ...... 839 Coil Chem, LLC ...... 1244 Innovex ...... 1233 Sharp Reflections, Inc...... 1829 Cold Bore Technology ...... 600 Interra Energy Services Ltd ...... 1346 . Silixa, LLC ...... 731 Columbine Corporation ...... 1534 Intrepid, Inc ...... 949 Sim Tech, LLC ...... 732 Comitt Well Solutions ...... 1347. ITF Software, LLC ...... 1502 Sound QI Solutions, Ltd...... 404 Completion Science ...... 1823 J-W Power Company ...... 411 Sparx Engineering ...... 1141 Computer Modelling Group ...... 1307 KAPPA Engineering ...... 907 Spectro Analytical Instruments ...... 1949 CoorsTek ...... 1335 Katalyst Data Management ...... 1509 Stepan Oilfield Solutions ...... 1635 Cordax Evaluation Technologies ...... 1338 King Canyon Buffalo, Inc...... 510 Stratum Reservoir ...... 1322 Core Laboratories ...... 713 Kureha Energy Solutions ...... 943 Subsurface Clarity, LLC ...... 846 Corescan ...... 1047 LMKR - GeoGraphix and GVERSE ...... 223 Subsurface Consultants & Associates, LLC . . . . . 1530 Corva AI, LLC ...... 1343 Luxfer MEL Technologies ...... 639 Tally Energy Services ...... 1839 D&L Oil Tools ...... 807 Messer Group ...... 730 TenEx Technologies, LLC ...... 1508 . Danomics, LLC ...... 1610 MicroSeismic, Inc ...... 1007 Terra Guidance, LLC ...... 726 DarkVision ...... 534 Mohawk Energy ...... 1146 Terra Laboratories ...... 1606 . DataLog & GeoVision ...... 1634 Morphpackers, LLC ...... 940 TerraCore ...... 1341. . Dawson Geophysical Company ...... 515 Nalco Champion ...... 1609 Terves Inc ...... 505 Deep Imaging ...... 1439 Nanometrics, Inc ...... 1038. TGS ...... 1315 Deepcast ai...... 325 NanoSeis ...... 642 The Oilfield Marketplace ...... 1132 Digital Formation / Nitec ...... 922 National Energy Technology Laboratory . . . 1440,1445 The Open Group ...... 1511 DiverterPlus, LLC ...... 1043 NatureWorks ...... 1145. . Thermo Fisher Scientific ...... 301 Downhole Chemical Solutions, LLC ...... 1042 NCS Multistage, LLC ...... 723 Thru Tubing Solutions ...... 1109 Downhole Technology ...... 322 Neuralog ...... 1429 Tracerco ...... 1311 Drill2Frac ...... 1433 New England Research ...... 1434 TRC Consultants, LC ...... 737 DynaEnergetics US, Inc ...... 649 Newwell Tech ...... 1706 Tricon Geophysics, Inc ...... 623 Dynamic Graphics Inc ...... 722 NexTier Completion Solutions ...... 1207 Tubel Energy ...... 1241 Dynamic Green Solutions (DGS) ...... 1147 NodalSeismic, LLC ...... 1827 U S. . Well Services ...... 1637 Dynamic Technologies (DTCC) ...... 1817 Novi Labs ...... 1149 University of Kansas ...... 1850 Earth Signal Processing, Ltd ...... 426 NRGX Technologies, Ltd...... 841,1844 . Univerisity of Texas at Austin Hydraulic EDGE Systems ...... 1331 NuTech Energy ...... 514 Fracturing & Sand Control Consortia ...... 1351 Emerson ...... 1133 OAG Analytics ...... 1449 Verdazo Analytics ...... 1402 EnerCorp Sand Solutions ...... 532 Omni Air & Nitrogen ...... 1741 Vertechs Energy Solutions, LLC ...... 1035 Engage Mobilize ...... 215 Optasense, Inc ...... 931 Vinci Technologies ...... 1830. . Enthought ...... 1430 Osperity ...... 300 W.D. Von Gonten ...... 1134 Enventure Global Technology ...... 625 PetroCubic Solutions ...... 1541 Water Lens, LLC ...... 1436 Enverus ...... 1022 PetroMar, a Nabors Company ...... 503 Well Data Labs, Inc ...... 601 EPAM Systems ...... 204 PetroSkills ...... 1239 WellDog ...... 1037 ESG Solutions ...... 1115 PetroStar Services, LLC ...... 1450 WellDrive ...... 1444 EVO, Inc...... 400 Petrosys USA, Inc ...... 1535 Western Falcon ...... 526 Excellence Logging ...... 422 Premier Oilfield Group ...... 1715 Wildcat Technologies, LLC ...... 842 Fairfield Geotechnologies ...... 1615 ProCoring ...... 1631 Wood Mackenzie ...... 1529 Field Geo Services, Inc ...... 1410 Proserv ...... 1046 World Oil/Gulf Publishing ...... 631 Flotek Industries ...... 1407 Quantico Energy Solutions ...... 413 XWorks Technologies, LLC ...... 743 FRACGEO, LLC ...... 707 QuickStartX.com ...... 1507 Zeeospheres Ceramics, LLC ...... 326 FracTech Laboratories ...... 604 Recover Energy Services, Inc ...... 431 Ziebel US, Inc ...... 537 Fracture ID, Inc ...... 315 Renegade Services ...... 1250 GEO ExPro ...... 1431 Reservoir Data Systems ...... 1638 GEODynamics ...... 1723 Reservoir Group ...... 1833 Geolog Americas, Inc ...... 1238 ResFrac Corporation ...... 1144 geoLOGIC systems ltd ...... 1415 Reveal Energy Services ...... 309

52 Re-think Your Pyrolysis

wildcattechnologies.com URTEC 2020 - Booth# 842

HAWK Pyrolysis & TOC Instrument HAWK-PAM Petroleum Assessment Laboratory & Wellsite EXHIBITION FLOOR PLAN (AS OF 7 MAY)

Note: Children under the age of 16 will 200 202 204 208 210 214 216 218 220 222 224 226 228 230 232 234 236 238 240 242 244 246 248 250 not be allowed in the exhibit hall during setup or teardown . Children 13 and older 201 203 205 209 215 223 227 231 237 239 241 245 Technical Session will be allowed to attend the exhibition Station A during regular exhibition hours if they 300 302 304 322 326 336 338 340 are properly registered, wearing their 301 303 305 309 315 323 325 331 337 343 345 347 351 badge and accompanied by an adult .

During exhibition hours, children under 400 402 404 422 426 442 444 446 450 the age of 13 will not be allowed into any 451 activities in the exhibit hall unless they are 401 411 413 415 423 425 431 433 435 437 439 443 445 447 Technical Session 550 young enough to be confined to a stroller, Station D 549 backpack, or front pack . 510 514 522 526 530 532 534 542 544 546 548 501 503 505 509 515 523 531 537 543 545 547

649 600 602 604 642 644 646

601 607 613 623 625 631 633 635 639 641 643 645 647

722 726 730 732 738 742 744 746

707 723 731 737 743 745 747

713 842 846

807 831 837 839 841 845 Technical Session Station B 936 940

922 907 931 937 943 947 949 914

1036 1038 1042 1046 1050 1013 1051 1022 1007 1033 1035 1037 1043 1047 1049

1122 1132 1134 1138 1142 1144 1146 1151

1109 1115 1123 1133 1139 1141 1145 1147 1149 ENTRANCE 1238 1242 1244

1250 1207 1213 1233 1239 1241 1243 1245

1338 1340 1342 1344 1346 1351

1307 1311 1315 1331 1335 1341 1343 1347 1349

1406 1410 1322 1430 1434 1436 1440 1442 1444 1450 1402 1449

1407 1411 1415 1423 1429 1431 1433 1439 1445 1447

1506 1508 1510 1528 1530 1534 1544 1546 1550 1502 Reserved Booths 1551 1507 1509 1511 1515 1523 1529 1535 1539 1541 1545

Available Booths 1606 1610 1634 1638 1651

1607 1609 1615 1623 1631 1633 1635 1637 1645 1647 1649

1706 1708 1710 1730 1732 1734 1744 1746 1750 1751

1707 1709 1715 1723 1731 1733 1735 1741 1743 1745 1747 1749

1806 1808 1810 1830 1832 1834 1836 1840 1842 1844 1850

1807 1809 1811 1813 1815 1817 1823 1827 1829 1833 1839 1845 Technical Session Station C 1912 1926 1928 1932 1934 1905 1917 U-Pitch URTeC Society 1913 1915 Bookstore 1925 1927 1929 1931 1933 1935 1939 1941 1943 1945 1947 1949

54 KAPPA | URAP Course

New FREE unconventional resources analysis course

To coincide with the release v.5.30 of KAPPA-Workstation a new short course on the analysis of Unconventional wells is now available…and it is FREE.

Find out more: kappaeng.com/training/urap MBWG17-115, 8143.77 MBWG17-113, 8119.52 MBWG17-111, 8090.93 MBWG17-109, 8027.62 MBWG17-107, 7755.35 MBWG17-105, 7544.75 MBWG17-103, 7410.41 MBWG17-101, 7268.42 MBWG17-99, 7082.97 MBWG17-97, 6771.69 MBWG17-95, 6675.64 MBWG17-93, 6431.64 MBWG17-91, 6076.07 MBWG17-89, 5937.90 MBWG17-87, 5660.26 MBWG17-85, 5596.45 MBWG17-83, 5509.88 MBWG17-81, 5371.31MBWG17-79, 5282.88 MBWG17-77, 5228.13 MBWG17-75, 5099.53 MBWG17-73, 5040.73 MBWG17-69, 4788.57 MBWG17-63, 4801.09 MBWG17-57, 3123.35 MBWG17-55, 3102.31 MBWG17-53, 3090.19 MBWG17-51, 3871.56 MBWG17-49, 4833.66 MBWG17-47, 4963.66 MBWG17-45, 5034.01

Offset: 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 200000 220000 240000 260000 280000 300000 320000 340000 360000 380000 400000 420000 440000

2.700 2.700

2.800 2.800

2.900 2.900

3.000 3.000

3.100 3.100

3.200 3.200

3.300 3.300

3.400 3.400

3.500 3.500

3.600 3.600

3.700 3.700

3.800 3.800

3.900 3.900

4.000 Need funding? Want to commercialize your 4.000 4.100 product? Are you ready to GROW? Join the 4.100 4.200 U-Pitch Technology Showcase where you 4.200 4.300 can pitch to potential investors, clients, 4.300 4.400 and partners. 4.400 4.500 4.500

4.600 4.600

4.700 4.700

4.800 4.800

4.900 4.900

5.000 5.000

5.100 YOUR ONLY LIMIT IS 5.100

5.200 5.200

5.300 THE LIMIT OF YOUR 5.300

5.400 5.400

5.500 IMAGINATION! 5.500 5.600 Dates: Monday, 20 July–Wednesday, 22 July 5.600

5.700 Times: 10:00a–5:00p (Monday and Tuesday) 5.700 10:00a–12:00p (Wednesday) 5.800 Location: Austin Convention Center – Exhibit Hall 5.800 Fee: $250 per presenter 5.900 Includes: Access to Exhibit Hall all three days, Opportunity to upload 5.900

6.000 presentation where attendees can view pitches via a link 6.000 posted on the website, Access to utilize a private meeting

6.100 room to finalize deals, Recognition on urtec.org/2020, 6.100 Recognition in the official URTeC Program Book 6.200 Limit: 30 presentation slots 6.200

6.300 U-Pitch is perfect for your: 6.300

6.400 • Technology start-up 6.400 • Technology commercialization 6.500 • Property or project that implements new technology for new reserves 6.500 or increased production 6.600 • Research consortium with new technology and techniques 6.600

6.700 6.700 What kinds of technologies attract investment?

6.800 • Smart technologies (new productivity apps, etc ). 6.800 • New imaging and interpretation software 6.900 • Safety and monitoring (smart operations) 6.900

7.000 • Data repositories 7.000 • Analytics platforms

7.100 • Oil field chemicals 7.100 • Sensors 7.200 • Infrastructure (communications, pipeline technology, gas processing 7.200 technologies) 7.300 7.300 • New materials used in drilling, etc .

7.400 • Drone technologies 7.400 • Robotics 7.500 • New services 7.500 • Your only limit is the limit of your imagination! 7.600 7.600 For more information please visit: URTeC.org/2020 7.700 See the energy at TGS.com 7.700

7.800 56 7.800 See the energy at TGS.com 7.900 7.900

8.000 8.000

8.100 8.100

8.200 8.200

8.300 8.300

8.400 8.400

8.500 8.500 MBWG17-115, 8143.77 MBWG17-113, 8119.52 MBWG17-111, 8090.93 MBWG17-109, 8027.62 MBWG17-107, 7755.35 MBWG17-105, 7544.75 MBWG17-103, 7410.41 MBWG17-101, 7268.42 MBWG17-99, 7082.97 MBWG17-97, 6771.69 MBWG17-95, 6675.64 MBWG17-93, 6431.64 MBWG17-91, 6076.07 MBWG17-89, 5937.90 MBWG17-87, 5660.26 MBWG17-85, 5596.45 MBWG17-83, 5509.88 MBWG17-81, 5371.31MBWG17-79, 5282.88 MBWG17-77, 5228.13 MBWG17-75, 5099.53 MBWG17-73, 5040.73 MBWG17-69, 4788.57 MBWG17-63, 4801.09 MBWG17-57, 3123.35 MBWG17-55, 3102.31 MBWG17-53, 3090.19 MBWG17-51, 3871.56 MBWG17-49, 4833.66 MBWG17-47, 4963.66 MBWG17-45, 5034.01

Offset: 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 180000 200000 220000 240000 260000 280000 300000 320000 340000 360000 380000 400000 420000 440000

2.700 2.700

2.800 2.800

2.900 2.900

3.000 3.000

3.100 3.100

3.200 3.200

3.300 3.300

3.400 3.400

3.500 3.500

3.600 3.600

3.700 3.700

3.800 3.800

3.900 3.900

4.000 4.000

4.100 4.100

4.200 4.200

4.300 4.300

4.400 4.400

4.500 4.500

4.600 4.600

4.700 4.700

4.800 4.800

4.900 4.900

5.000 5.000

5.100 5.100

5.200 5.200

5.300 5.300

5.400 5.400

5.500 5.500

5.600 5.600

5.700 5.700

5.800 5.800

5.900 5.900

6.000 6.000

6.100 6.100

6.200 6.200

6.300 6.300

6.400 6.400

6.500 6.500

6.600 6.600

6.700 6.700

6.800 6.800

6.900 6.900

7.000 7.000

7.100 7.100

7.200 7.200

7.300 7.300

7.400 7.400

7.500 7.500

7.600 7.600

7.700 See the energy at TGS.com 7.700

7.800 7.800

See the energy at TGS.com 7.900 7.900

8.000 8.000

8.100 8.100

8.200 8.200

8.300 8.300

8.400 8.400

8.500 8.500 P.O. Box 979 • Tulsa, OK 74101-0979 REGISTER NOW URTeC.org/2020