DOCSLIB.ORG

Merrimack River Watershed Wetland 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Merrimack River Watershed Wetland 2009 Technical Report Merrimack River Watershed Wetland Restoration Strategy Prepared for NH Department of Environmental Services 29 Hazen Drive Concord, New Hampshire 03302 Prepared by /Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Six Bedford Farms Drive, Suite 607 Bedford, New Hampshire 03110 In association with: Society for the Protection of NH Forests and naturesource communication March 2009 C:\Documents and Settings\pwalker\Desktop\WatershedReport_rev5.docx Acknowledgements Special thanks go to Lori Sommer of the NHDES Wetlands Bureau and Emily Brunkhurst of the NHF&G Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program whose technical knowledge, collaborative spirit and patient leadership made this project successful. Dan Sundquist of the NH Society for the Protection of NH Forests shared his salient insights as a special technical advisor to the team, and Michele Tremblay of naturesource communication assisted with the public involvement process. The following individuals and organizations provided valuable guidance during the development of this project through their participation on the project Technical Advisory Group: Collis Adams, Department of Environmental Services, Wetlands Bureau Mary Ann Tilton, Department of Environmental Services, Wetlands Bureau Mike Stanley, Department of Environmental Services, Wetlands Bureau Paul Currier, Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau Ted Walsh, Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau Ken Edwardson, Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau Steve Gaughan, Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau Eric Williams, Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau Rick Chormann, Department of Environmental Services, State Geologist’s Office George Hastings, Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau Mike Marchand, Department of Fish and Game, Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program Steve Couture, Department of Environmental Services, Rivers Management and Protection Program Steve Landry, Department of Environmental Services, Watershed Management Bureau Minda Shaheen, Southern NH Regional Planning Commission Don Kent, Department of Resources and Economic Development, Natural Heritage Bureau Tracey Boisvert, NH Office of Energy and Planning Funding for this project was provided by a Wetland Program Development Grant from the US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1 to the NH Department of Environmental Services. C:\Documents and Settings\pwalker\Desktop\WatershedReport_rev5.docx Table of Contents 1. An Overview of Wetland Restoration 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methods of Wetland Restoration ........................................................................................ 3 1.3 Implementing a Wetland Restoration Project ................................................................... 10 2. Development of a Wetland Restoration Assessment Model 2.1 Watershed Geodatabase .................................................................................................. 14 2.2 Site Identification Model .................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Site Prioritization Model .................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Model Evaluation .............................................................................................................. 24 3. Conceptual Restoration Plans 3.1 Selection of Example Sites for Field Review .................................................................... 28 3.2 Field Review Procedures .................................................................................................. 29 3.3 Conceptual Restoration Plan Elements ............................................................................ 29 3.4 Description of Example Restoration Sites ........................................................................ 30 3.5 Cost Estimates .................................................................................................................. 51 3.6 Net Functional Benefits ..................................................................................................... 52 4. Findings & Recommendations 4.1 Suggested Model Improvements ...................................................................................... 54 4.2 Recommendations to Communities .................................................................................. 56 5. Literature Cited ............................................................................................................... 59 6. Glossary ............................................................................................................................ 60 Appendices Appendix A - ARM Fund Documents Appendix B - Watershed Maps (Under Separate Cover) Appendix C - Functional Evaluation Detailed Methodology Appendix D - Model Output Appendix E - Conceptual Restoration Cost Estimates Appendix F – Functional Benefit Scores for Example Sites C:\Documents and Settings\pwalker\Desktop\WatershedReport_rev5.docx Table of Contents i Tables Table 2-1 Site ID Model Base Data ........................................................................ 16 Table 2-2 Site Identification Model Attributes ......................................................... 17 Table 3-2 Site Identification Results by Watershed Community ............................ 18 Table 2-4 Ecological Integrity (NH Method) ........................................................... 22 Table 2-5 Restoration Sustainability Scoring ......................................................... 23 Table 2-6 Landscape Position Scoring ................................................................... 23 Figures Figure 1-1 HUC-8 Watersheds Figure 2-1 Wetland Restoration Assessment Model - Site Prioritization Model Schematic Figure 2-2 Wetland Restoration Assessment Model - Functional Evaluation Components C:\Documents and Settings\pwalker\Desktop\WatershedReport_rev5.docx Table of Contents ii 1 An Overview of Wetland Restoration 1.1 Introduction Wetlands are widely known to be critical to protect water quality, to provide wildlife habitat, to mitigate floods, and to provide many other important natural functions. Although New Hampshire has been relatively successful in protecting wetland resources, many have been degraded by past and current land uses and more are impacted each year as the state grows. Restoration of these degraded areas holds great potential to help improve New Hampshire’s water quality, wildlife habitat and general quality of life. 1.1.1 The ARM Fund The recent development of the “Aquatic Resource Mitigation Fund” (ARM Fund) has provided a promising new source of grant money to help with wetland restoration efforts. These funds are available to New Hampshire cities and towns to implement programs to restore, protect or create aquatic habitats. The fund accepts payments (“in-lieu fees”) made by applicants for state wetland dredge and fill permits under RSA 482-A, who pay into the fund to help offset (“mitigate”) the impacts of their proposed projects. These funds are then pooled on a watershed basis and managed by the NH Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) and a Site Selection Committee made up of watershed stakeholders. The intent of the fund is to provide grants to environmental and community organizations to conduct worthwhile projects that will yield environmental benefits in the watershed.1 Figure 1-1 shows a map of the sixteen “HUC-8” watersheds in NH. The ARM Fund comprises 16 accounts which correspond to each one of the watersheds; the law requires that in-lieu fee payments made by a project within a particular watershed be 1 Appendix A contains the portion of RSA 482-A which references the establishment of the ARM Fund, as well as the Memorandum of Understanding between the NHDES and the US Army Corps of Engineers that allows use of “in-lieu fee” payments to be used for wetland mitigation. C:\Documents and Settings\pwalker\Desktop\WatershedReport_rev5.docx An Overview of Wetland Restoration 1 \\nh-bed\projects\51955.00\reports\Draft_Report\Figures\Fig_1-1.indd Source: NH Department of Environmental Services Figure 1-1 HUC-8 Watersheds Merrimack River Watershed Wetland Restoration Strategy spent within that same watershed [RSA 482-A:31,III(c)]. The Merrimack River Watershed contains the largest amount of funds collected to date (more than $650,000 through the end of January 2009), and it is also the first watershed for which ARM funds are available.2 1.1.2 Development of a Wetland Restoration Assessment Model (WRAM) Conservation organizations have developed a tremendous amount of information on ecologically important areas in New Hampshire over the years - with a focus on preservation. Additionally, excellent progress has been made in NH’s coastal region on restoring salt marsh habitat. But relatively little is known about potential wetland restoration sites in the Merrimack River Watershed and other watersheds in the state. To address the need, The NHDES, working with its partners at the NH Fish and Game Department, the US Environmental Protection Agency and other state and federal partners, have commissioned this study of the Merrimack River Watershed. A thorough and systematic study of wetland restoration opportunities in the basin will
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NH Trout Stocking - April 2018
    NH Trout Stocking - April 2018 Town WaterBody 3/26‐3/30 4/02‐4/06 4/9‐4/13 4/16‐4/20 4/23‐4/27 4/30‐5/04 ACWORTH COLD RIVER 111 ALBANY IONA LAKE 1 ALLENSTOWN ARCHERY POND 1 ALLENSTOWN BEAR BROOK 1 ALLENSTOWN CATAMOUNT POND 1 ALSTEAD COLD RIVER 1 ALSTEAD NEWELL POND 1 ALSTEAD WARREN LAKE 1 ALTON BEAVER BROOK 1 ALTON COFFIN BROOK 1 ALTON HURD BROOK 1 ALTON WATSON BROOK 1 ALTON WEST ALTON BROOK 1 AMHERST SOUHEGAN RIVER 11 ANDOVER BLACKWATER RIVER 11 ANDOVER HIGHLAND LAKE 11 ANDOVER HOPKINS POND 11 ANTRIM WILLARD POND 1 AUBURN MASSABESIC LAKE 1 1 1 1 BARNSTEAD SUNCOOK LAKE 1 BARRINGTON ISINGLASS RIVER 1 BARRINGTON STONEHOUSE POND 1 BARTLETT THORNE POND 1 BELMONT POUT POND 1 BELMONT TIOGA RIVER 1 BELMONT WHITCHER BROOK 1 BENNINGTON WHITTEMORE LAKE 11 BENTON OLIVERIAN POND 1 BERLIN ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER 11 BRENTWOOD EXETER RIVER 1 1 BRISTOL DANFORTH BROOK 11 BRISTOL NEWFOUND LAKE 1 BRISTOL NEWFOUND RIVER 11 BRISTOL PEMIGEWASSET RIVER 11 BRISTOL SMITH RIVER 11 BROOKFIELD CHURCHILL BROOK 1 BROOKFIELD PIKE BROOK 1 BROOKLINE NISSITISSIT RIVER 11 CAMBRIDGE ANDROSCOGGIN RIVER 1 CAMPTON BOG POND 1 CAMPTON PERCH POND 11 CANAAN CANAAN STREET LAKE 11 CANAAN INDIAN RIVER 11 NH Trout Stocking - April 2018 Town WaterBody 3/26‐3/30 4/02‐4/06 4/9‐4/13 4/16‐4/20 4/23‐4/27 4/30‐5/04 CANAAN MASCOMA RIVER, UPPER 11 CANDIA TOWER HILL POND 1 CANTERBURY SPEEDWAY POND 1 CARROLL AMMONOOSUC RIVER 1 CARROLL SACO LAKE 1 CENTER HARBOR WINONA LAKE 1 CHATHAM BASIN POND 1 CHATHAM LOWER KIMBALL POND 1 CHESTER EXETER RIVER 1 CHESTERFIELD SPOFFORD LAKE 1 CHICHESTER SANBORN BROOK
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Study of the Suncook River in Epsom, Pembroke, and Allenstown, New Hampshire, 2009
    Prepared in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Study of the Suncook River in Epsom, Pembroke, and Allenstown, New Hampshire, 2009 Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5127 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Photograph looking downstream at area of Suncook River avulsion, Epsom, New Hampshire. (Photograph taken on June 18, 2008) Flood Study of the Suncook River in Epsom, Pembroke, and Allenstown, New Hampshire, 2009 By Robert H. Flynn Prepared in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency Scientific Investigations Report 2010–5127 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Flynn, R.H., 2010, Flood study of the Suncook River in Epsom, Pembroke, and Allenstown, New Hampshire, 2009: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Space Master Plan
    SECTION VII. CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE A. INTRODUCTION The Conservation and Open Space Section is intended to guide the protection of the City’s natural resources and environment while promoting the appropriate and efficient use of land and water within the City of Concord in a manner consistent with the economic, physical, and social needs and desires of the citizens of Concord. Appropriate uses of open space have been identified as recreation, public service and safety, resource production, and environmental protection while providing the maximum and multi-purpose use of open space by the citizens of Concord. Open space in Concord is intended to be a system, interconnected and interrelated, and therefore, the links among major open space areas, as well as between the open areas and developed areas, must be defined The Conservation and Open Space Use Section consists of a review of existing protected lands with a focus on additions to the protected land inventory that have occurred since the last Master Plan was adopted in December 1993. Conservation and open space goals are articulated, and applied to and interpreted upon the landscape of the City, and as displayed on maps that indicate how land in Concord should be preserved and protected. Policies and recommendations to guide the implementation of the Future Open Space Plan complete this Section of the Master Plan. B. CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE GOALS When the City Council established the Conservation Commission in 1971, it set forth for the Commission the goal of "protecting, promoting and developing the natural resources...and for protecting the watershed resource of the City" and mandated the Conservation Commission, in conjunction with the City Planning Board, to prepare "a conservation and open space plan" as the major objective in achieving this goal, noting that the plan shall be based "on the concept of multiple use of natural resources and open space".
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Chichester
    A History of Chichester . Written on the occasion of our 250th Anniversary 1727 -1977 CONTENTS Preface. .. 5 The Establishment of Chichester. .. 7 Original Gran t . .. 8 Early Beginnings. .. 10 The Settlement of Chichester. .. 22 The Churches. .. 58 The Schools. .. 67 Old Home Day Celebrations. .. 80 Organizations. .. 87 Town Services. 102 Town Cemeteries. 115 Wars and Veterans. .. 118 3 PREFACE Our committee was formed to put into print some account of our town's history to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the granting of the original charter of our town. The committee has met over the past year and one-half and a large part of the data was obtained from the abstracts of the town records which were kept by Augustus Leavitt, Harry S. Kelley's history notes written in 1927 for the 200th anniversary and from the only sizable printed history of Chichester written by D. T. Brown in Hurd's History of Merrimack and Belknap Counties containing thirty seven pages. In researching we found that a whole generation is missing. It is regrettable that a history wasn't done before now when much that is now lost was within the mem- ory of some living who had the knowledge of our early history. Our thanks to the townspeople who have contributed either information, pic- tures, maps and written reports. It is our hope that the contents will be interesting and helpful to this and future generations. The Chichester History Committee Rev. H. Franklin Parker June E. Hatch Ruth E. Hammen 5 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CHICHESTER Chichester was one of seven towns granted in New Hampshire in 1727 while Lieutenant Governor John Wentworth administered the affairs of the province, then a part of Massachusetts.
    [Show full text]
  • Merrimack Valley
    Aì Im Aì !"`$ ?{ Aù ?x Ij ?¬ ?¬ Im Ai AÔ Aù AÔ ?x ?v !"b$ Ij AÔ AÙ Aä ?¸ !"`$ ?¨ Im AÕ A£ CÚ ?{ ?x A¢ AÖ Ij ?} ?} ?v Il ?} Aõ A¡ ?} Il Ae AÑ ?} AÙ AÑ fg ?¸ ?} ?} Aù Aä !"b$ A¡ !"`$ ?} Ij AÕ A¤ CÓ ?} CÒ Ij ?¸ AÑ ?} ?} C¹ ?{ #V Im Aõ ?¨ AÑ Aý AÙ Ij AÖ fgA B C D AÕ E F G 4 Lake Winnipesaukee d . Merrymeeting Lake Greenough Pond R ALTON BAY STATE FOREST ROLLINS STATE PARK F R A N K L I N 0 K F R A N K L I N B E L M O N T h B E L M O N T e t N 1 9 PAGE STATE FOREST a o . u Sondogardy Pond Aä 8 r r o Crystal Lake 1 th s NNOORRTTHH FFIIEE LLDD N 6 y S O N w a I . R SSAA LLIISS BB UURRYY E GG I O 6 an H r R E t STATE FOREST NURSERY R m Palmer Pond 3 S l i g 4 E S i 3v . K E G e S A K C e L A . N L k 7 n Marsh Pond 3r t 5 1 MEADOW POND STATE FOREST a r . R-11 N Suncook River F R s M o Tucker Pond 1 New Pond MERRIH MACK VALLEY REGION r Chalk Pond 3 r d Stevens Brook AÑ e o 1 t 5 1 h Forest Pond 4 u Lyford Pond . h AYERS STATE FOREST 4 0 Marchs Pond ?§ H e Shellcamp Pond n fg m r S U T T O N B i t n Merrymeeting River S U T T O N g 6 A a d a .
    [Show full text]
  • QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN for Nashua River Watershed Association Volunteer Water Monitoring Program
    QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN FOR Nashua River Watershed Association Volunteer Water Monitoring Program Amended Document Date: June 27, 2018 Prepared by: Nashua River Watershed Association 592 Main St, Groton, MA 01450 With funding from: The Fieldstone Foundation, The Greater Lowell Community Foundation, and member donations PROJECT MANAGER_________________________________________________________________ Martha Snow Morgan, Water Programs Director Date Nashua River Watershed Association PROJECT COORDINATOR____________________________________________________________ Kathryn Nelson, Water Monitoring Coordinator Date Nashua River Watershed Association PROJECT SUPERVISOR_______________________________________________________________ Elizabeth Ainsley Campbell, Executive Director Date Nashua River Watershed Association MassDEP QA COORDINATOR _______________________________________________________ Richard Chase Date NHDES QA COORDINATOR____________________________________________________________ Ted Walsh Date New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Nashua River Watershed Association Quality Assurance Project Plan Revision 2.0 4/30/2019 2.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 TITLE AND APPROVAL PAGE…............................................ ............................................................. 1 2.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 DISTRIBUTION LIST ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Recreation Recreation Outdoor Massachusetts the Wildlife
    Photos by MassWildlife by Photos Photo © Kindra Clineff massvacation.com mass.gov/massgrown Office of Fishing & Boating Access * = Access to coastal waters A = General Access: Boats and trailer parking B = Fisherman Access: Smaller boats and trailers C = Cartop Access: Small boats, canoes, kayaks D = River Access: Canoes and kayaks Other Massachusetts Outdoor Information Outdoor Massachusetts Other E = Sportfishing Pier: Barrier free fishing area F = Shorefishing Area: Onshore fishing access mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/fba/ Western Massachusetts boundaries and access points. mass.gov/dfw/pond-maps points. access and boundaries BOAT ACCESS SITE TOWN SITE ACCESS then head outdoors with your friends and family! and friends your with outdoors head then publicly accessible ponds providing approximate depths, depths, approximate providing ponds accessible publicly ID# TYPE Conservation & Recreation websites. Make a plan and and plan a Make websites. Recreation & Conservation Ashmere Lake Hinsdale 202 B Pond Maps – Suitable for printing, this is a list of maps to to maps of list a is this printing, for Suitable – Maps Pond Benedict Pond Monterey 15 B Department of Fish & Game and the Department of of Department the and Game & Fish of Department Big Pond Otis 125 B properties and recreational activities, visit the the visit activities, recreational and properties customize and print maps. mass.gov/dfw/wildlife-lands maps. print and customize Center Pond Becket 147 C For interactive maps and information on other other on information and maps interactive For Cheshire Lake Cheshire 210 B displays all MassWildlife properties and allows you to to you allows and properties MassWildlife all displays Cheshire Lake-Farnams Causeway Cheshire 273 F Wildlife Lands Maps – The MassWildlife Lands Viewer Viewer Lands MassWildlife The – Maps Lands Wildlife Cranberry Pond West Stockbridge 233 C Commonwealth’s properties and recreation activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Supply of the United States 1960
    Surface Water Supply of the United States 1960 Part 1 -A. North Atlantic Slope Basins, Maine to Connecticut Prepared under the direction of E. L. HENDRICKS, Chief, Surface Water Branch GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1701 Prepared in cooperation with the States of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont, and with other agencies UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1961 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. PREFACE This report was prepared by the Geological Survey in coopera­ tion with the States of Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, and Vermont, and with other agencies, by personnel of the Water Resources Division, L. B. Leopold, chief, under the general direction of E. L. Hendricks, chief, Surface Water Branch, and F. J. Flynn, chief, Basic Records Section. The data were collected and computed under supervision of dis­ trict engineers, Surface Water Branch, as follows: D. F. Dougherty............................................................. Albany, N. Y. G. S. Hayes................................................................. Augusta, Maine John Horton................................................................. Hartford, Conn. C. E. Knox................................................................... Boston, Mass, HI CALENDAR FOR WATER YEAR 1960
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to NH Timber Harvesting Laws
    Guide to New Hampshire Timber Harvesting Laws ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This publication is an updated and revised edition prepared by: Sarah Smith, Extension Professor/Specialist, Forest Industry, UNH Cooperative Extension Debra Anderson, Administrative Assistant, UNH Cooperative Extension We wish to thank the following for their review of this publication: Dennis Thorell, NH Department of Revenue Administration JB Cullen, NH Division of Forests and Lands Karen P. Bennett, UNH Cooperative Extension Bryan Nowell, NH Division of Forests and Lands Hunter Carbee, NH Timberland Owners Association, NH Timber Harvesting Council Sandy Crystal, Vanessa Burns, and Linda Magoon, NH Dept. of Environmental Services University of New Hampshire Cooperative Extension 131 Main Street, Nesmith Hall Durham, New Hampshire 03824 http://ceinfo.unh.edu NH Division of Forests and Lands PO Box 1856, 172 Pembroke Rd. Concord, NH 03302-1856 http://www.dred.state.nh.us/forlands New Hampshire Timberland Owners Association 54 Portsmouth Street Concord, New Hampshire 03301 www.nhtoa.org UNH Cooperative Extension programs and policies are consistent with pertinent Federal and State laws and regulations on non-discrimination regarding race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, age, handicap or veteran’s status. College of Life Sciences and Agriculture, County Governments, NH Department of Resources and Economic Development, NH Fish and Game, USDA and US Fish and Wildlife Service cooperating. Funding was provided by: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Economic Action Program Cover photo: Claude Marquis, Kel-Log Inc., works on the ice-damaged Gorham Town Forest August 2004 Table of Contents New Hampshire’s Working Forest ......................................................................................2 Introduction to Forestry Laws ............................................................................................4 Current Use Law .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Impervious Surface Estimates for Coastal New Hampshire
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and PREP Reports & Publications Space (EOS) 12-2002 Developing Impervious Surface Estimates for Coastal New Hampshire David G. Justice [email protected] Fay A. Rubin [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/prep Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Justice, David G. and Rubin, Fay A., "Developing Impervious Surface Estimates for Coastal New Hampshire" (2002). PREP Reports & Publications. 298. https://scholars.unh.edu/prep/298 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space (EOS) at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in PREP Reports & Publications by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEVELOPING IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ESTIMATES FOR COASTAL NEW HAMPSHIRE A Final Report to The New Hampshire Estuaries Project Submitted by David Justice and Fay Rubin Complex Systems Research Center Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space Morse Hall University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 December, 2002 Revised January, 2003 This report was funded in part by a grant from the Office of State Planning, New Hampshire Estuaries Project, as authorized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to Section 320 of the Clean Water Act. Table of Contents Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………….…. 2 List of Tables………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………………… 3 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Project Goals and Objectives………………………………………………………...…………….
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report New Hampshire Statewide Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
    Final Report New Hampshire Statewide Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Bacteria Impaired Waters Final Report September, 2010 Final Report New Hampshire Statewide Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for Bacteria Impaired Waters State of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services P.O. Box 95 29 Hazen Drive Concord, New Hampshire 03302-0095 Prepared by: FB Environmental Associates, Inc. 97A Exchange Street, Suite 305 Portland, Maine 04101 Final Report New Hampshire Statewide TMDL for Bacteria Impaired Waters September 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Purpose of Report ...................................................................................................................... 3 1.3. Report Format ............................................................................................................................ 5 2. Water Quality Standards for Bacteria ..............................................................................................13 2.1. Overview of Pathogens and Indicator Bacteria ..........................................................................13 2.2. Water Quality Standards for Bacteria in New Hampshire Waters ..............................................14 2.2.1. Classification and Designated Uses
    [Show full text]