DOCSLIB.ORG

A Pleiotropic Chemoreceptor Facilitates the Coupling of Pheromonal Signal Perception 2 and Production 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Pleiotropic Chemoreceptor Facilitates the Coupling of Pheromonal Signal Perception 2 and Production 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/124305; this version posted January 14, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 A pleiotropic chemoreceptor facilitates the coupling of pheromonal signal perception 2 and production 3 4 Kathleen M. Zelle1,†, Cassondra Vernier1,†, Xitong Liang2, Sean Halloran3, Jocelyn G. 5 Millar3, Yehuda Ben-Shahar 1,4,* 6 7 1Department of Biology, Washington University in Saint Louis, 1 Brookings Drive, Saint 8 Louis, MO 63130 USA. 9 2Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South 10 Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA 11 3Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, 900 University Avenue, 12 Riverside, CA 92521, USA 13 4Lead Contact 14 *Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.B.) 15 †Denotes equal contribution 16 17 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/124305; this version posted January 14, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 18 SUMMARY 19 Optimal mating decisions depend on reliable and precise species-specific coupling of 20 the production and perception of mating communication signals because any functional 21 changes in either the signal or its perception should carry a fitness cost (Boake, 1991; 22 Brooks et al., 2005; Hoy et al., 1977b; Shaw et al., 2011; Shaw and Lesnick, 2009; 23 Steiger et al., 2010; Sweigart, 2010; Symonds and Elgar, 2008; Wyatt and Cambridge 24 University Press, 2014). Previously published theoretical models predict that genetic 25 linkage between sensory-driven mate choices and specific communication signals could 26 provide a robust mechanism for maintaining robust and stable signal production and 27 perception at the level of populations, while still retaining the capacity for future signal 28 diversification (Hoy et al., 1977b; Shaw et al., 2011; Shaw and Lesnick, 2009; Wiley et 29 al., 2011). Several experimental studies have provided empirical evidence that 30 pleiotropy is one possible genetic solution for maintaining functional coupling between 31 specific communication signals and the mate choice behaviors they elicit at the 32 population level (Hoy et al., 1977b; Shaw et al., 2011; Shaw and Lesnick, 2009; Wiley et 33 al., 2011). However, the complex characteristics of mating signals and behaviors 34 present a major barrier for identifying the actual pleiotropic genes and molecular 35 pathways that provide genetic linkages between the production and perception of 36 mating signals (Chenoweth and Blows, 2006; Singh and Shaw, 2012). Here we show 37 that in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, some pheromone-driven mating choices 38 are coupled to the production of specific mating signals via pleiotropic chemoreceptors. 39 Specifically, we demonstrate that Gr8a, a member of the gustatory receptor family, 40 independently contributes to the perception of inhibitory mating signals in pheromone 41 sensing neurons, as well as in regulating the production of inhibitory mating signals in 42 oenocytes. Together, these data provide a relatively simple molecular explanation for 43 how coupling of pheromone perception and production, two independent physiological 44 processes, remains robust. 45 46 Keywords: Drosophila melanogaster; Vinegar fly; Fruit fly; Cuticular hydrocarbons; 47 Gr8a; Oenocyte. 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/124305; this version posted January 14, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 48 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 49 Similar to other insect species, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has evolved 50 cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs), synthesized by the fat body and oenocytes (Billeter et 51 al., 2009; Gutierrez et al., 2006; Krupp et al., 2013; Makki et al., 2014), which primarily 52 provide a hydrophobic desiccation barrier, as well as play an important role as 53 pheromones that regulate diverse aspects of insect behavior (Blomquist and Bagnères, 54 2010; Chung and Carroll, 2015; Ferveur, 2005; Howard and Blomquist, 2005). 55 Specifically, complex blends of CHCs are often utilized by insect species to 56 communicate sex identity and female mating status, and well as defining the behavioral 57 reproductive boundaries between closely related species (Billeter et al., 2009; Chung 58 and Carroll, 2015; Chung et al., 2014; Coyne et al., 1994; Dweck et al., 2015; Ng et al., 59 2014; Shirangi et al., 2009; Yew and Chung, 2015). In Drosophila, the perception of 60 volatile CHCs is mediated by olfactory sensory neurons located in the antennae and 61 maxillary palps (Benton et al., 2007; Kurtovic et al., 2007; Lebreton et al., 2014; van der 62 Goes van Naters and Carlson, 2007), while less volatile CHCs, which require contact, 63 are sensed by specialized gustatory-like receptor neurons (GRNs) in the appendages 64 (legs and wings) and the proboscis (Koh et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2014; 65 Thistle et al., 2012; Toda et al., 2012). While some of the genes and pathways that 66 contribute to CHC synthesis in Drosophila are known, the molecular identities of the 67 majority of CHC receptors remain unknown. Previous work suggested that the gene 68 Desat1, which encodes a fatty acid desaturase enriched in oenocytes, might also 69 independently contribute to CHC perception (Bousquet et al., 2012). However, due to 70 the expression of Desat1 in central neurons (Billeter et al., 2009) and the broad impact 71 its mutant alleles have on the CHC profiles of both males and females (Labeur et al., 72 2002), whether Desat1 directly contributes to mating signal perception remains 73 unresolved. 74 Consequently, we chose to examine members of the Gustatory receptor (Gr) gene 75 family as candidates for pleiotropic factors that might contribute directly to both 76 perception and production of pheromonal mating signals in Drosophila. Because several 77 family members have already been implicated in the detection of specific excitatory and 78 inhibitory pheromones (Bray and Amrein, 2003; Hu et al., 2015; Miyamoto and Amrein, 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/124305; this version posted January 14, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 79 2008; Moon et al., 2009; Watanabe et al., 2011), and the majority of genes that encode 80 family members are already known to be enriched in gustatory receptor neurons 81 (GRNs) (Clyne et al., 2000; Dunipace et al., 2001; Scott et al., 2001; Wang et al., 2004), 82 we reasoned that any pleiotropic Gr genes should also be expressed in abdominal 83 oenocytes (Billeter et al., 2009). Subsequently, an RT-PCR screen revealed that 24 out 84 of the 60 genes that encode Gr family members in the Drosophila genome (Clyne et al., 85 2000; Dunipace et al., 2001; Robertson et al., 2003; Scott et al., 2001) exhibit enriched 86 expression in abdominal tissues (Table S1). 87 Although several members of the Gr receptor family, including Gr68a, Gr32a, Gr66a, 88 Gr39a, and Gr33a, have been previously linked to the sensory perception of mating 89 pheromones (Bray and Amrein, 2003; Lacaille et al., 2009; Miyamoto and Amrein, 2008; 90 Moon et al., 2009; Watanabe et al., 2011), none of these candidate pheromone 91 receptors were identified in our initial screen for Gr genes with enriched mRNA 92 expression in abdominal tissues of either males or females (Table S1). However, Gr8a, 93 which we have identified as a male-specific gene in our screen, is localized to a 94 chromosomal region that was previously implicated in chemoreception with enriched 95 expression in abdomens (Table S1) and was previously shown to specifically contribute 96 to the sensory detection of the non-proteinogenic amino acid L-Canavanine (Lee et al., 97 2012; Shim et al., 2015). Because our initial expression screen was based on whole- 98 abdomen RNAs, and it was previously reported that Gr8a is also expressed in some 99 abdominal neurons (Park and Kwon, 2011), we next used a GAL4 transgenic driver to 100 examine the spatial expression pattern of Gr8a in males and females. As was 101 previously reported, we found that Gr8a is expressed in 14-16 GRNs in the proboscis 102 (Figure 1A) (Lee et al., 2012) as well as in two paired GRNs in the foreleg pretarsus 103 (Figure 1B) of males and females. In addition, the Gr8a-GAL4 reporter was also highly 104 expressed in abdominal oenocyte-like cells in males but not females (Figure 1C). The 105 male-specific abdominal expression pattern was further supported by qRT-PCR (Figure 106 1D). Using immunohistochemistry, we then demonstrated that Gr8a is co-expressed 107 with the oenocyte marker Desat1 (Billeter et al., 2009), as well as in Desat1-negative 108 cells with fat-body-like morphology (Figure 1E-G). 4 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/124305; this version posted January 14, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 109 Together, the enriched expression of Gr8a in foreleg GRNs, a primary pheromone 110 chemosensory organ (Lu et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2014), and its sexually dimorphic 111 expression in oenocytes suggested that in addition to its role in L-Canavanine 112 perception, Gr8a also contributes to mating behaviors. Since mate choices of both male 113 and female flies are determined by a complex blend of excitatory and inhibitory 114 pheromones (Billeter et al., 2009; Krupp et al., 2013), we anticipated that if Gr8a is 115 indeed a pleiotropic factor that independently contributes to the perception and 116 production of specific components of the male mating pheromone bouquet, then 117 disruptions of the signal production in males or its perception in females should carry 118 similar impacts on female mate choice behavior.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Effect of Carotid Chemoreceptor Inhibition on Exercise Tolerance in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Randomized-Controlled Crossover Trial
    Respiratory Medicine 160 (2019) 105815 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Respiratory Medicine journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/rmed The effect of carotid chemoreceptor inhibition on exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomized-controlled crossover trial a,b � a,c a a Devin B. Phillips , Sophie E. Collins , Tracey L. Bryan , Eric Y.L. Wong , M. Sean McMurtry d, Mohit Bhutani a, Michael K. Stickland a,e,* a Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada b Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta, Canada c Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Canada d Division of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Canada e G.F. MacDonald Centre for Lung Health, Covenant Health, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Background: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have an exaggerated ventilatory COPD response to exercise, contributing to exertional dyspnea and exercise intolerance. We recently demonstrated Exercise tolerance enhanced activity and sensitivity of the carotid chemoreceptor (CC) in COPD which may alter ventilatory and Carotid chemoreceptor cardiovascular regulation and negatively affect exercise tolerance. We sought to determine whether CC inhibi­ Dyspnea tion improves ventilatory and cardiovascular regulation, dyspnea and exercise tolerance in COPD. Methods: Twelve mild-moderate COPD patients (FEV1 83 � 15 %predicted) and twelve age- and sex-matched healthy controls completed two time-to-symptom limitation (TLIM) constant load exercise tests at 75% peak À À power output with either intravenous saline or low-dose dopamine (2 μg⋅kg 1⋅min 1, order randomized) to inhibit the CC.
    [Show full text]
  • Visions & Reflections on the Origin of Smell: Odorant Receptors in Insects
    Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63 (2006) 1579–1585 1420-682X/06/141579-7 DOI 10.1007/s00018-006-6130-7 Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences © Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2006 Visions & Reflections On the ORigin of smell: odorant receptors in insects R. Benton Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, Box 63, New York, New York 10021 (USA), Fax: +1 212 327 7238, e-mail: [email protected] Received 23 March 2006; accepted 28 April 2006 Online First 19 June 2006 Abstract. Olfaction, the sense of smell, depends on large, suggested that odours are perceived by a conserved mecha- divergent families of odorant receptors that detect odour nism. Here I review recent revelations of significant struc- stimuli in the nose and transform them into patterns of neu- tural and functional differences between the Drosophila ronal activity that are recognised in the brain. The olfactory and mammalian odorant receptor proteins and discuss the circuits in mammals and insects display striking similarities implications for our understanding of the evolutionary and in their sensory physiology and neuroanatomy, which has molecular biology of the insect odorant receptors. Keywords. Olfaction, odorant receptor, signal transduction, GPCR, neuron, insect, mammal, evolution. Olfaction: the basics characterised by the presence of seven membrane-span- ning segments with an extracellular N terminus. OR pro- Olfaction is used by most animals to extract vital infor- teins are exposed to odours on the ciliated endings of olf- mation from volatile chemicals in the environment, such actory sensory neuron (OSN) dendrites in the olfactory as the presence of food or predators.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aer Protein and the Serine Chemoreceptor Tsr Independently
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 94, pp. 10541–10546, September 1997 Biochemistry The Aer protein and the serine chemoreceptor Tsr independently sense intracellular energy levels and transduce oxygen, redox, and energy signals for Escherichia coli behavior (signal transductionybacterial chemotaxisyaerotaxis) ANURADHA REBBAPRAGADA*, MARK S. JOHNSON*, GORDON P. HARDING*, ANTHONY J. ZUCCARELLI*†, HANSEL M. FLETCHER*, IGOR B. ZHULIN*, AND BARRY L. TAYLOR*†‡ *Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics and †Center for Molecular Biology and Gene Therapy, School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA 92350 Edited by Daniel E. Koshland, Jr., University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved July 17, 1997 (received for review May 6, 1997) ABSTRACT We identified a protein, Aer, as a signal conformational change in the signaling domain that increases transducer that senses intracellular energy levels rather than the rate of CheA autophosphorylation. The phosphoryl resi- the external environment and that transduces signals for due from CheA is transferred to CheY, which, in its phos- aerotaxis (taxis to oxygen) and other energy-dependent be- phorylated state, binds to a switch on the flagellar motors and havioral responses in Escherichia coli. Domains in Aer are signals a reversal of the direction of rotation of the flagella. similar to the signaling domain in chemotaxis receptors and Evidence that CheA, CheW, and CheY are also part of the the putative oxygen-sensing domain of some transcriptional aerotaxis response (12) led us to propose that the aerotaxis activators. A putative FAD-binding site in the N-terminal transducer would have (i) a C-terminal domain homologous to domain of Aer shares a consensus sequence with the NifL, Bat, the chemoreceptor signaling domain that modulates CheA and Wc-1 signal-transducing proteins that regulate gene autophosphorylation and (ii) a domain that senses oxygen.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical and Electric Transmission in the Carotid Body Chemoreceptor Complex
    EYZAGUIRRE Biol Res 38, 2005, 341-345 341 Biol Res 38: 341-345, 2005 BR Chemical and electric transmission in the carotid body chemoreceptor complex CARLOS EYZAGUIRRE Department of Physiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Research Park, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA ABSTRACT Carotid body chemoreceptors are complex secondary receptors. There are chemical and electric connections between glomus cells (GC/GC) and between glomus cells and carotid nerve endings (GC/NE). Chemical secretion of glomus cells is accompanied by GC/GC uncoupling. Chemical GC/NE transmission is facilitated by concomitant electric coupling. Chronic hypoxia reduces GC/GC coupling but increases G/NE coupling. Therefore, carotid body chemoreceptors use chemical and electric transmission mechanisms to trigger and change the sensory discharge in the carotid nerve. Key terms: carotid body, chemosensory activity, glomus cells. The subject of this short review is highly Years later, with the advent of the appropriate since we are honoring Prof. electron microscope, it was found that the Patricio Zapata who has been a pioneer in glomus cells were connected synaptically this field and has done extensive to the carotid nerve endings (for refs. see pharmacological studies on chemical Mc Donald, 1981; Verna, 1997). Then, the synaptic transmission in the carotid body. problems started because of the location of Dr. Zapata is an excellent scientist and clear core synaptic vesicles. At the time, teacher, and I dearly value him as a friend these structures were supposed to be a and colleague. marker of pre-synaptic elements, and in the carotid body, they appeared some times in the glomus cells but very often in NATURE OF THE CAROTID BODY INNERVATION carotid nerve endings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Chemoreceptor Evolution in Behavioral Change Cande, Prud’Homme and Gompel 153
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Smells like evolution: the role of chemoreceptor evolution in behavioral change Jessica Cande, Benjamin Prud’homme and Nicolas Gompel In contrast to physiology and morphology, our understanding success. How an organism interacts with its environment of how behaviors evolve is limited.This is a challenging task, as can be divided into three parts: first, the sensory percep- it involves the identification of both the underlying genetic tion of diverse auditory, visual, tactile, chemosensory or basis and the resultant physiological changes that lead to other cues; second, the processing of this information by behavioral divergence. In this review, we focus on the central nervous system (CNS), leading to a repres- chemosensory systems, mostly in Drosophila, as they are one entation of the sensory signal; and third, a behavioral of the best-characterized components of the nervous system response. Thus, behaviors could evolve either through in model organisms, and evolve rapidly between species. We changes in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) (e.g. examine the hypothesis that changes at the level of [1 ]), or through changes in higher-order neural circuitry chemosensory systems contribute to the diversification of (Figure 1). While the latter remain elusive, recent work behaviors. In particular, we review recent progress in on chemosensation in insects illustrates how the PNS understanding how genetic changes between species affect shapes behavioral evolution. chemosensory systems and translate into divergent behaviors. A major evolutionary trend is the rapid Chemosensation in insects depends on three classes of diversification of the chemoreceptor repertoire among receptors expressed in peripheral neurons housed in species.
    [Show full text]
  • Signaling and Sensory Adaptation in Escherichia Coli Chemoreceptors
    Review Special Issue: Microbial Translocation Signaling and sensory adaptation in Escherichia coli chemoreceptors: 2015 update 1 2 3 John S. Parkinson , Gerald L. Hazelbauer , and Joseph J. Falke 1 Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA 2 Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA 3 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA Motile Escherichia coli cells track gradients of attractant sensitivity to ambient conditions, allowing chemoreceptors and repellent chemicals in their environment with trans- to operate over a wide concentration range. membrane chemoreceptor proteins. These receptors How do chemoreceptors process stimulus and sensory operate in cooperative arrays to produce large changes adaptation signals? How do they control CheA activity in in the activity of a signaling kinase, CheA, in response to response to those signals? What is the structure of the core small changes in chemoeffector concentration. Recent receptor signaling complex? How are those units net- research has provided a much deeper understanding of worked to produce cooperative signaling behavior? Over the structure and function of core receptor signaling the past few years of chemoreceptor research, molecular complexes and the architecture of higher-order receptor answers to these questions have come into sharper focus. arrays, which, in turn, has led to new insights into the In this brief review we summarize evidence for an emerg- molecular signaling mechanisms of chemoreceptor net- ing dynamics-based view of receptor operation and how it works. Current evidence supports a new view of recep- can account for transmission of stimulus and sensory tor signaling in which stimulus information travels adaptation signals through chemoreceptor molecules.
    [Show full text]
  • Olfactory Sensitivity in Mammalian Species
    Physiol. Res. 65: 369-390, 2016 https://doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.932955 REVIEW Olfactory Sensitivity in Mammalian Species M. WACKERMANNOVÁ1, L. PINC2, †L. JEBAVÝ3 1Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic, 2Canine Behavior Research Center, Department of Animal Science and Ethology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic, 3Department of Animal Science and Ethology, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic Received November 13, 2014 Accepted February 5, 2016 On-line April 12, 2016 Summary Corresponding author Olfaction enables most mammalian species to detect and M. Wackermannová, Department of Zoology and Fisheries, discriminate vast numbers of chemical structures called odorants Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech and pheromones. The perception of such chemical compounds is University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamycka 129, 160 00 mediated via two major olfactory systems, the main olfactory Prague 6, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] system and the vomeronasal system, as well as minor systems, such as the septal organ and the Grueneberg ganglion. Distinct Introduction differences exist not only among species but also among individuals in terms of their olfactory sensitivity; however, little is Chemosensory systems develop very early in known about the mechanisms that determine these differences. ontogeny and are found in almost every animal. The In research on the olfactory sensitivity of mammals, scientists mammalian sense of smell detects and discriminates thus depend in most cases on behavioral testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Taste Smell Touch „Chemical“ Senses
    Senses II taste smell touch „Chemical“ senses . Chemical senses – sense of taste and smell . Chemoreceptors respond to chemical compounds dissolved in water . Taste – substances dissolved in saliva . Smell – substances dissolved in nasal mucosa Sense of taste . There is about 10 000 taste buds located on the tongue . Taste buds are located in tongue papillas . Three main types of papillas . philiform, fungiform, a circumvallate . fungiform and circumvalatte contains taste buddies Anatomy of taste buddies . Each taste buds consists of 3 main types of cells: . support cells – surrounding receptor cell . basal cells – „stem“ cells . chemoreceptor itsef – taste cells Sense of taste Figure 15.1 Taste feelings . Five (Six) main taste perceptions . sweet – sugar, saccharine, alcohol, some aminoacids . salty – iron ions . sour – H+ ions . bitter – alcaloids as e.g. chinidin, nicotin . umami – glutamic acid . fat – fatty acids Sense of taste . To percept and feel, the chemical compound must: . dissolve in salive . to get into contact with cilia on taste cells . Substance bounding to cilia will: . depolarize membrane of taste receptor, and neurotransmitter is released . generator action potential is formed, that will trigger action potential Examples of some human thresholds Taste Substance Threshold for tasting Salty NaCl 0.01 M Sour HCl 0.0009 M Sweet Sucrose 0.01 M Bitter Quinine 0.000008 M Umami Glutamate 0.0007 M Sweet 1-propyl-2 amino-4- 0.00002 M nitrobenzene Sweet Lactose 0.03 M CNS pathway . Head nerved VII, IX and X carry the action potential from taste buddies into solitary nuclei in medulla oblongata . These impulses are led through thalamus into: . cortex (insula frontal cortex) .
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Ventilation
    CHAPTER 1 Regulation of Ventilation © IT Stock/Polka Dot/ inkstock Chapter Objectives By studying this chapter, you should be able to do 5. Describe the chemoreceptor input to the brain the following: stem and how it modifi es the rate and depth of breathing. 1. Describe the brain stem structures that regulate 6. Explain why it is that the arterial gases and pH respiration. do not signifi cantly change during moderate 2. Defi ne central and peripheral chemoreceptors. exercise. 3. Explain what eff ect a decrease in blood pH or 7. Discuss the respiratory muscles at rest and carbon dioxide has on respiratory rate. during exercise. How are they infl uenced by 4. Describe the Hering–Breuer reflex and its endurance training? function. 8. Describe respiratory adaptations that occur in response to athletic training. Chapter Outline Passive and Active Expiration Eff ects of Blood PCO 2 and pH on Ventilation Respiratory Areas in the Brain Stem Proprioceptive Refl exes Dorsal Respiratory Group Other Factors Ventral Respiratory Group Hering–Breuer Refl ex Apneustic Center Ventilation Response During Exercise Pneumotaxic Center Ventilation Equivalent for Oxygen () V/EOV 2 Chemoreceptors Ventilation Equivalent for Carbon Dioxide Central Chemoreceptors ()V/ECV O2 Peripheral Chemoreceptors Ventilation Limitations to Exercise Eff ects of Blood PO 2 on Ventilation Energy Cost of Breathing Ventilation Control During Exercise Chemical Factors Copyright ©2014 Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company Content not final. Not for sale or distribution. 17097_CH01_Pass4.indd 3 10/12/12 2:13 PM 4 Chapter 1 Regulation of Ventilation Passive and Active Expiration Ventilation is controlled by a complex cyclic neural process within the respiratory Brain stem Th e lower part centers located in the medulla oblongata of the brain stem .
    [Show full text]
  • Afferents Integration and Neural Adaptive Control of Breathing by Chung Tin
    Afferents Integration and Neural Adaptive Control of Breathing by Chung Tin B.Eng., Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, 2002 S.M., Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE 2011 @ 2011 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of A uthor ..................... ....... .... ...* .. ........ ................................... Dep a ent of Mechanical Engineering May 19,2011 C ertified by ........................................... ............... .... ........................................... / Chi-Sang Poon Principal Research Scientist of Health Sciences & Technology Thesis Supervisor C ertified by ................................9 .- .. ............ y .... ... .................................... Neville Hogan Sun Jae Professor of Mechanical Engineering Professor of Brain and Cognitive Sciences TesiComnuittee Chair A ccepted by ................................................................. ... ............................................ David E. Hardt Ralph E. and Eloise F. Cross Professor of Mechanical Engineering Chairman, Committee on Graduate Students Afferents Integration and Neural Adaptive Control of Breathing by Chung Tin Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering On May 19, 2011, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree
    [Show full text]
  • The Senses Reception of a Stimulus
    The Senses eg. individual sensitivities, eg colorblindness we spend our lives in an ocean of sensory stimuli: ! unusual pathways, eg synesthesia light gravity electrical currents vibrations time our survival depends on our ability to perceive, interpret and respond to these signals Reception vs Perception Reception is the mechanism and structures involved in detecting and transmitting sensory information our body has millions of sensory receptors All sensory receptors are “connected to” our CNS by way of sensory neurons these neurons travel through the Cranial or Spinal nerves to the brain or spinal cord Perception is the conscious awareness of sensory stimuli is a higher level process of integration and interpretation depends on how the brain processes the signals it is receiving Human Anatomy & Physiology: The Senses; Ziser, Lecture Notes 2010.3 1 Human Anatomy & Physiology: The Senses; Ziser, Lecture Notes 2010.3 2 photoreceptor - light Reception of a Stimulus chemoreceptor - chemicals mechanoreceptor - bending, pressure, touch Reception of a sensation is determined by: thermoreceptor - temperature osmoreceptor – salt/water conc 1. Source of Sensory Stimuli baroreceptor - fluid pressure each sensory receptor is designed to transduce we can classify receptors by their location or only one kind of stimulus regardless of the source of the stimulus they respond to: how it is stimulated a. exteroceptors eg hard hit on head ! “see stars” near surface of body eg. spicy food monitor external environment eg. menthol cough drop most special senses 3. Density of Receptors & Size of Receptive b. visceroceptors (interoceptors) Field deep monitor internal environment 99% of receptors in body not evenly distributed over surface of body c.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronic Pain: Inflammation-Dependent Chemoreceptor Adaptation in Rat Carotid Body
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital.CSIC A CHRONIC PAIN: INFLAMMATION-DEPENDENT CHEMORECEPTOR ADAPTATION IN RAT CAROTID BODY X. Liu1, L. He1, B. Dinger1, C. Gonzalez2, L. Stensaas1 and S. Fidone1 1Department of Physiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. 2Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular y Fisiología,Instituto de Biología y Genética Molecular y CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Universidad de Valladolid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas e Instituto Carlos III. Facultad de Medicina 47005 Valladolid, Spain. Running head: Inflammation and Chemoreceptor Adaptation Corresponding author: Dr. Bruce Dinger Department of Physiology University of Utah School of Medicine 420 Chipeta Way Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA Abstract Experiments in recent years have revealed labile electrophysiological and neurochemical phenotypes in primary afferent neurons exposed to specific stimulus conditions associated with the development of chronic pain. These studies collectively demonstrate that the mechanisms responsible for functional plasticity are primarily mediated by novel neuroimmune interactions involving circulating and resident immune cells and their secretory products, which together induce hyperexcitability in the primary sensory neurons. In another peripheral sensory modality, namely the arterial chemoreceptors, sustained stimulation in the form of chronic hypoxia (CH) elicits increased chemoafferent excitability from the mammalian carotid body. Previous studies which focused on functional changes in oxygen-sensitive type I cells in this organ have only partially elucidated the molecular and cellular mechanisms which initiate and control this adaptive response. Recent studies in our laboratory indicate a unique role for the immune system in regulating the chemo-adaptive response of the carotid body to physiologically relevant levels of hypoxia.
    [Show full text]