The Neotropical Bushmeat Crisis and Its Impact on Primate Populations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Neotropical Bushmeat Crisis and Its Impact on Primate Populations GOING TO POT The Neotropical Bushmeat Crisis and its Impact on Primate Populations Care for the Wild International PRO WILDLIFE The Granary, Tickfold Farm, Graefelfinger Str. 65 Kingsfold, West Sussex, RH12 3SE D-81375 Munich Telephone: 44 1306 627900 Telephone: +49 (0) 89 81299-507 Fax: 44 1306 627901 Fax: +49 (0) 89 81299-706 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Web: www.careforthewild.com Web: www.prowildlife.de © 2007 Contents 1. Executive summary The devastating effects of the bushmeat1 trade on wild primates in Central and West Africa are well recognized (Damania et al. 1. Executive Summary 2 2005; Bowen-Jones & Pendry 1999; Noss 1998). In contrast, the largely uncontrolled hunting of primates in Central and South America has received little attention. As in Africa, the convergence of large-scale deforestation, increasing commercial 2. The Neotropical bushmeat crisis 3 hunting, and the capture of live animals has devastating effects on Neotropical primates, and is set to push many species to the 2.1. Why primate hunting is on the rise 3 brink of extinction. 2.2. The Impact of hunting on Neotropical primates 4 2.3. Sustainable primate hunting? 5 Drawing on almost 200 primarily scientific publications, this report comprehensively reviews the scale of primate use across 22 3. Central and South America 5 Central and South American countries. In doing so, we demonstrate that current levels of offtake are unsustainable across 3.1. Central America 5 most Neotropical primates' range and that effective conservation measures are urgently required. 3.1.1. Belize 5 In at least 162 of the 22 Neotropical nations examined (see chapter 3) hunting for bushmeat poses a critical threat to 3.1.2. Costa Rica 5 primate populations. There is a paucity of data for the remaining five countries (Argentina, Belize, El Salvador, Nicaragua and 3.1.3. El Salvador 6 Uruguay), However, this does of course not imply a paucity of problems. One country, Chile, does not have any primates at all. 3.1.4. Guatemala 6 3.1.5. Honduras 6 Approximately eight million people in South America regularly consume bushmeat as a source of protein (Rushton et al. 3.1.6. Mexico 6 2005). A significant portion of bushmeat from tropical forests consists of primates (Robinson & Bennett 2004; Schulte-Herbrüggen 3.1.7. Nicaragua 7 & Rossiter 2003; Robinson & Bodmer 1999). While local farmers and subsistence hunters are consumers and increasingly traders (Rushton et al. 2005; Ojasti 1996), wealthier households also consume considerable amounts of bushmeat (Peres 3.1.8. Panama 7 2000a). 3.2. South America 8 3.2.1. Argentina 8 Rural populations in the Brazilian Amazon alone are estimated to consume between 2.2 and 5.4 million primates per year 3.2.2. Brazil 8 (Appendix, table 1). Because of their slow reproductive rate and low population densities many primate species cannot sustain 3.2.3. Bolivia 9 this immense offtake (Jerozolimski & Peres 2003; Bodmer & Puertas 2000; Horwich 1998). Hunting of large and medium sized 3.2.4. Chile 10 Neotropical primates, such as woolly (Lagothrix sp.), spider (Ateles sp.), howler (Alouatta sp.) and capuchin (Cebus sp.) monkeys occurs at a rate which poses an extreme threat to their long-term survival. Although current hunting levels are lower in 3.2.5. Colombia 10 some areas, this does not necessarily indicate decreased threat. Instead, these numbers may reflect overexploitation in the past 3.2.6. Ecuador 11 that has lead to generally low population numbers (Alvard et al. 1997). The increasing commercialisation of bushmeat 3.2.7. French Guiana 12 hunting, modern hunting techniques and equipment, expanding infrastructure, and growing human populations, 3.2.8. Guyana 12 combined with serious habitat degradation and fragmentation further exacerbate the situation (see chapter 2). 3.2.9. Paraguay 12 3.2.10. Peru 13 Whereas the extent of habitat destruction in the Neotropics is widely acknowledged, the serious impact of hunting is often ignored. 3.2.11. Suriname 14 However, the hunting of primates for food, rather than habitat loss is predicted to pose the most serious threat to the survival of large primates in Central and South America within the next two decades (Wilkie & Godoy 2001; Peres 2001). 3.2.12. Trinidad 14 As in Africa, habitat fragmentation and hunting are synergistic, causing newly accessed forest regions to become available to 3.2.13. Uruguay 14 hunters (Peres 2001). 3.2.14. Venezuela 15 4. Conservation strategies 15 Data from hunted areas in many different Amazonian sites show that large primate biomass has dropped by up to 93.5%, 5. Recommendations 16 in comparison to areas where hunting is absent. The impact of this reduction goes beyond the effects on primate species. 5.1. Recommendations to range states 16 There is a domino effect on the forest ecosystem as a whole (Chapman & Onderdonk 1998). Primates are important seed dispersers (de Castro 2003; Mollison 2003). Highly mobile woolly and spider monkeys feed on fruits, and woolly monkeys in 5.2. Recommendations to Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 16 particular consume the fruit of over 200 different woody plants (Di Fiore 2004; Ráez-Luna 1995). The removal of these species 5.3. Recommendations to Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) 17 therefore significantly affects the ability of plants to disperse their seeds and changes the dominance relationship 6. References 18 between tree species. In the medium term this leads to changes in forest composition, structure, and biodiversity 7. Appendix 21 (Estrada 2006; Roldán & Simonetti 2001; Wilkie & Godoy 2001; Wright et al. 2000). Table 1: Volume of primate hunting in Brazilian Amazon 21 Table 2: Primate hunting by indigenous groups in Brazil 21 The hunting of Neotropical primates outlined in this report illustrates how a traditional way of life has become biologically Table 3: Primate hunting by indigenous groups in Peru 22 devastating. There are no easy answers to this dilemma, and any resolution of this continent-wide conservation crisis depends on the genuine commitment from all stakeholders. Preventing the disappearance of many primate species in the Neotropics Table 4: Primates of the Neotropics and reasons for their offtake 22 requires urgent national and international action. To protect national biodiversity and the integrity of their forests, range Table 5: Key data on habitat destruction in the Neotropics 27 states are therefore encouraged to prohibit primate hunting and strengthen the implementation and enforcement of binding protection measures (see Chapter 5). This report also provides recommendations to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Care for the Wild International and Pro Wildlife would like to thank Lucy Molleson, Shirley McGreal, and Helene Palomino, for their valuable input. Helene Palomino, Niels Starnick (BamS), and Siegfried Weisel also kindly provided photographs. 1 Bushmeat is defined as meat for human consumption derived from wild animals. 2 Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Cover photos: © Helene Palomino Trinidad, and Venezuela. 2 In addition to being hunted for food, primates are also killed for 'medicinal' purposes, and occasionally as bait for large cats, 2. The Neotropical bushmeat crisis fish or shrimp, with woolly and spider monkeys again being the mostly targeted species (Mittermeier 1987a). Furthermore, in many tourist shops throughout much of Amazonia hats from monkey-skins, necklaces from monkey teeth, skulls, bones, hands, feet or tails have been observed on sale (Mittermeier & Konstant 1996/1997). 2.1. Why primate hunting is on the rise Consequentially, once populations of larger primates are depleted, medium-sized species experience the same fate because Changes in infrastructure they are "next in line" in terms of body mass (Ward & Chism 2003; Peres 2000b). Small primate species such as marmosets Until the 1960s, when federally funded highway construction programs were initiated, large parts of the Amazon were (Callithrix sp.), Goeldi's monkeys (Callimico goeldii), squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sp.) and tamarins (Saguinus sp.) are targeted inaccessible. Since then networks of roads have penetrated formerly isolated regions. With the roads came human settlements, primarily for the pet trade, however if larger species diminish, these species are also hunted for food (Mittermeier 1987a). In which colonised previously uncharted forests. Historically, hunting activities were limited to areas on the periphery of human some areas, small species such as tamarins and squirrel monkeys are reportedly highly sought after to obtain teeth for settlements. Today all forest areas within ten kilometres of a road or navigable river are accessible on foot and are therefore necklaces and armbands rather than for food (Cormier 2006). subject to hunting pressure (Peres 2000a). More than three-quarters of the Amazon basin can now be reached on foot (Peres & Lake 2003). New roads encourage new settlements and further deforestation, which in turn provide entry points for hunters Hunting also disrupts the age and sex structure of populations: In some areas hunters actively seek out females accompanied and traders from the outside (Durand & Lazes 2004; Mäki et al. 2001). In fact, the population density of highly sought after by juveniles, so that the offspring can be sold to the pet trade (Chapman & Peres 2001, Mittermeier 1987a). The Waimiri species is strongly linked with proximity to rivers or roads (Peres & Lake 2003; Robinson & Bennett 2002; Peres 2001). The Atroari Indians in Brazil are reported to kill five times as many female spider monkeys as males, because body fat in females construction of a road in Ecuador's Yasuni National Park by an oil company, for example, increased the accessibility of is greater and their meat is considered "tastier".
Recommended publications
  • PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BRAZILIAN HOWLER MONKEYS, GENUS Alouatta (PLATYRRHINI, ATELIDAE), BASED on Γ1-GLOBIN PSEUDOGENE SEQUENCES
    Genetics and Molecular Biology, 22, 3, 337-344 Phylogenetic(1999) relationships of Brazilian howler monkeys 337 PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BRAZILIAN HOWLER MONKEYS, GENUS Alouatta (PLATYRRHINI, ATELIDAE), BASED ON γ1-GLOBIN PSEUDOGENE SEQUENCES Carla Maria Meireles1, John Czelusniak1, Stephen F. Ferrari2, Maria Paula Cruz Schneider2 and Morris Goodman1 ABSTRACT The genus Alouatta (howler monkeys) is the most widely distributed of New World primates, and has been arranged in three species groups: the Central American Alouatta palliata group and the South American Alouatta seniculus and Alouatta caraya groups. While the latter is monotypic, the A. seniculus group encompasses at least three species (A. seniculus, A. belzebul and A. fusca). In the present study, approximately 600 base pairs of the γ1-globin pseudogene were sequenced in the four Brazilian species (A. seniculus, A. belzebul, A. fusca and A. caraya). Maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood methods yielded phylogenetic trees with the same arrangement: {A. caraya [A. seniculus (A. fusca, A. belzebul)]}. The most parsimoni- ous tree had bootstrap values greater than 82% for all groupings, and strength of grouping values of at least 2, supporting the sister clade of A. fusca and A. belzebul. The study also confirmed the presence of a 150-base pair Alu insertion element and a 1.8-kb deletion in the γ1-globin pseudogene in A. fusca, features found previously in the remaining three species. The cladistic classification based on molecular data agrees with those of morphological studies, with the monospecific A. caraya group being clearly differentiated from the A. seniculus group. INTRODUCTION southern Mexico to northern Argentina, and is found in tropical and subtropical forest ecosystems throughout Bra- The systematics of the New World monkeys (infra- zil (Hirsch et al., 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Differences in the Social Behavior of Juvenile Spider Monkeys (Ateles Geoffroyi) Michelle Amanda Rodrigues Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2007 Sex differences in the social behavior of juvenile spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) Michelle Amanda Rodrigues Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Rodrigues, Michelle Amanda, "Sex differences in the social behavior of juvenile spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi)" (2007). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 14829. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/14829 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sex differences in the social behavior of juvenile spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) by Michelle Amanda Rodrigues A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major: Anthropology Program of Study Committee: Jill D. Pruetz, Major Professor W. Sue Fairbanks Maximilian Viatori Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2007 Copyright © Michelle Amanda Rodrigues, 2007. All rights reserved. UMI Number: 1443144 UMI Microform 1443144 Copyright 2007 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 ii For Travis, Goldie, Clydette, and Udi iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS viii ABSTRACT ix CHAPTER 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of the Caatinga Howler Monkey, Brazil Final Report Brazil
    080209 - Conservation of the Caatinga Howler Monkey, Brazil Final Report Brazil, State of Piauí, August 2009 to June 2011. Institutions: Sertões Consultoria Ambiental e Assessoria Overall Aim: Promote the recovery of the Caatinga Howler Monkey through habitat conservation and community involvement Authors: THIERES PINTO AND IGOR JOVENTINO ROBERTO Bill Cartaxo 135, Sapiranga, Fortaleza, Ceará Zip Code: 60833-185 Brazil Emails: [email protected] [email protected] Date: January 23, 2011. Table of Contents SECTION 1……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… pg. 3 SUMMARY …………………………………………………………………………………………..………………… pg. 3 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………………………………………………… pg. 3 PROJECT MEMBERS………………………………………………………………………………………………… pg. 4 SECTION 2. ……………………………………………………………………………………………..……………… pg. 4 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES……………………………………………………………………..……………………… pg. 4 METHODOLOGY……………………………………………………………………………………………………… pg. 4 OUTPUTS AND RESULTS…………………………………………………………………………………………… pg. 5 Goal 1 (A): Determine the interactions between the local communities and the Caatinga Howler Monkey and its habitat…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… pg. 5 Goal 1 (B.1): Evaluate the perception of the local communities regarding the importance of environmental resources and the conservation of the Caatinga Howler Monkey. …………...………………………………………………… pg. 6 Goal 1 (C): Identify the anthropic threats to the Caatinga Howler Monkey and its habitat conservation. ……… pg. 8 Goal 2: Increase our knowledge on the species ecological requirements (habitat preferences,
    [Show full text]
  • Low Paternity Skew and the Influence of Maternal Kin in an Egalitarian
    Low paternity skew and the influence of maternal kin in an egalitarian, patrilocal primate Karen B. Striera,1, Paulo B. Chavesb, Sérgio L. Mendesc, Valéria Fagundesc, and Anthony Di Fioreb,d aDepartment of Anthropology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706; bDepartment of Anthropology and Center for the Study of Human Origins, New York University, New York, NY 10003; cDepartamento de Ciências Biológicas, Centro de Ciências Humanas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Maruipe, Vitória, ES 29043-900, Brazil; and dDepartment of Anthropology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 Contributed by Karen B. Strier, October 12, 2011 (sent for review September 11, 2011) Levels of reproductive skew vary in wild primates living in The fecal samples used for paternity analyses included the 22 multimale groups depending on the degree to which high-ranking infants born between 2005 and 2007 that survived to ≥2.08 y of males monopolize access to females. Still, the factors affecting age, their 21 mothers (representing diverse ages and histories) paternity in egalitarian societies remain unexplored. We combine (Table S1), and the 24 adult males that were possible sires of at unique behavioral, life history, and genetic data to evaluate the least one infant (Table S2). We considered a male to be a po- distribution of paternity in the northern muriqui (Brachyteles tential sire for an infant if he was >5 y and was known to have hypoxanthus), a species known for its affiliative, nonhierarchical completed a copulation before the infant’s estimated conception relationships. We genotyped 67 individuals (22 infants born over a date (birth date minus mean 216.4-d gestation) (16).
    [Show full text]
  • Diets of Howler Monkeys
    Chapter 2 Diets of Howler Monkeys Pedro Américo D. Dias and Ariadna Rangel-Negrín Abstract Based on a bibliographical review, we examined the diets of howler mon- keys to compile a comprehensive overview of their food resources and document dietary diversity. Additionally, we analyzed the effects of rainfall, group size, and forest size on dietary variation. Howlers eat nearly all available plant parts in their habitats. Time dedicated to the consumption of different food types varies among species and populations, such that feeding behavior can range from high folivory to high frugivory. Overall, howlers were found to use at least 1,165 plant species, belonging to 479 genera and 111 families as food sources. Similarity in the use of plant taxa as food sources (assessed with the Jaccard index) is higher within than between howler species, although variation in similarity is higher within species. Rainfall patterns, group size, and forest size affect several dimensions of the dietary habits of howlers, such that, for instance, the degree of frugivory increases with increased rainfall and habitat size, but decreases with increasing group size in groups that live in more productive habitats. Moreover, the range of variation in dietary habits correlates positively with variation in rainfall, suggesting that some howler species are habitat generalists and have more variable diets, whereas others are habi- tat specialists and tend to concentrate their diets on certain plant parts. Our results highlight the high degree of dietary fl exibility demonstrated by the genus Alouatta and provide new insights for future research on howler foraging strategies. Resumen Con base en una revisión bibliográfi ca, examinamos las dietas de los monos aulladores para describir exhaustivamente sus recursos alimenticios y la diversidad de su dieta.
    [Show full text]
  • The Survival of the Central American Squirrel Monkey
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2005 The urS vival of the Central American Squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedi): the habitat and behavior of a troop on the Burica Peninsula in a conservation context Liana Burghardt SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Burghardt, Liana, "The urS vival of the Central American Squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedi): the habitat and behavior of a troop on the Burica Peninsula in a conservation context" (2005). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 435. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/435 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Survival of the Central American Squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedi): the habitat and behavior of a troop on the Burica Peninsula in a conservation context Liana Burghardt Carleton College Fall 2005 Burghardt 2 I dedicate this paper which documents my first scientific adventure in the field to my father. “It is often necessary to put aside the objective measurements favored in controlled laboratory environments and to adopt a more subjective naturalistic viewpoint in order to see pattern and consistency in the rich, varied context of the natural environment” (Baldwin and Baldwin 1971: 48). Acknowledgments This paper has truly been an adventure and as is common I have many people I wish to thank.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Squirrel Monkey Scientific Name: Saimiri Sciureus
    Common Squirrel Monkey Scientific Name: Saimiri sciureus Class: Mammalia Order: Primates Family: Cebidae The head and body length is 10.4 to 14.4 in.; tail length is 14 to 17 in; and weight is 2.5 to 3.7 lb. The tail is not prehensile. These diurnal monkeys are arboreal and only occasionally descend to the ground. Movement is quadrupedal with relatively little leaping. Ranges are often ill-defined and troops may number into the 40-50 range. During the mating season males establish a dominance hierarchy through fierce fighting with the higher-ranking individuals then interacting with the females. The females establish a dominance hierarchy during pregnancy. After the birth of the young, females exclude the males. The newborn cling to their mothers back for the first few weeks of life. Independence is achieved at 1 year. Range East of the Andes from Colombia and northern Peru to north- eastern Brazil Habitat Primary and secondary forests, cultivated areas, usually along streams Gestation 152-172 days Litter 1 Behavior These diurnal monkeys are arboreal and only occasionally descend to the ground. Movement is quadrupedal with relatively little leaping. Wild troops are most active from early to mid-morning and mid- to late afternoon, usually resting an hour or two at midday. Ranges are often ill-defined, and troops may number into the 40-50 range. Groups are known to split during the day into subgroups of pregnant females, females with young and adult males. Reproduction During the mating season males establish a dominance hierarchy through fierce fighting with the higher-ranking individuals then interacting with the females.
    [Show full text]
  • The Current Status of the Newworld Monkey Phylogeny Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciências, Vol
    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências ISSN: 0001-3765 [email protected] Academia Brasileira de Ciências Brasil Schneider, Horacio The current status of the NewWorld Monkey Phylogeny Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, vol. 72, núm. 2, jun;, 2000, pp. 165-172 Academia Brasileira de Ciências Rio de Janeiro, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=32772205 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative The Current Status of the New World Monkey Phylogeny∗ ∗∗ HORACIO SCHNEIDER Campus Universitário de Bragança, Universidade Federal do Pará, Alameda Leandro Ribeiro, s/n – 68600-000 Bragança, Pará, Brazil Manuscript received on January 31, 2000; accepted for publication on February 2, 2000 ABSTRACT Four DNA datasets were combined in tandem (6700 bp) and Maximum parsimony and Neighbor-Joining analyses were performed. The results suggest three groups emerging almost at the same time: Atelidae, Pitheciidae and Cebidae. The total analysis strongly supports the monophyly of the Cebidae family, group- ing Aotus, Cebus and Saimiri with the small callitrichines. In the callitrichines, the data link Cebuela to Callithrix, place Callimico as a sister group of Callithrix/Cebuella, and show Saguinus to be the earliest offshoot of the callitrichines. In the family Pithecidae, Callicebus is the basal genus. Finally, combined molecular data showed congruent branching in the atelid clade, setting up Alouatta as the basal lineage and Brachyteles-Lagothrix as a sister group and the most derived branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Endangered species From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Contents For other uses, see Endangered species (disambiguation). Featured content "Endangered" redirects here. For other uses, see Endangered (disambiguation). Current events An endangered species is a species which has been categorized as likely to become Random article Conservation status extinct . Endangered (EN), as categorized by the International Union for Conservation of Donate to Wikipedia by IUCN Red List category Wikipedia store Nature (IUCN) Red List, is the second most severe conservation status for wild populations in the IUCN's schema after Critically Endangered (CR). Interaction In 2012, the IUCN Red List featured 3079 animal and 2655 plant species as endangered (EN) Help worldwide.[1] The figures for 1998 were, respectively, 1102 and 1197. About Wikipedia Community portal Many nations have laws that protect conservation-reliant species: for example, forbidding Recent changes hunting , restricting land development or creating preserves. Population numbers, trends and Contact page species' conservation status can be found in the lists of organisms by population. Tools Extinct Contents [hide] What links here Extinct (EX) (list) 1 Conservation status Related changes Extinct in the Wild (EW) (list) 2 IUCN Red List Upload file [7] Threatened Special pages 2.1 Criteria for 'Endangered (EN)' Critically Endangered (CR) (list) Permanent link 3 Endangered species in the United
    [Show full text]
  • Online Appendix for “The Impact of the “World's 25 Most Endangered
    Online appendix for “The impact of the “World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates” list on scientific publications and media” Table A1. List of species included in the Top25 most endangered primate list from the list of 2000-2002 to 2010-2012 and used in the scientific publication analysis. There is the year of their first mention in the Top25 list and the consecutive mentions in the following Top25 lists. Species names are the current species names (based on IUCN) and not the name used at the time of the Top25 list release. First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Species mention mention mention mention mention mention Ateles fusciceps 2006 Ateles hybridus 2006 2008 2010 Ateles hybridus brunneus 2004 Brachyteles hypoxanthus 2000 2002 2004 Callicebus barbarabrownae 2010 Cebus flavius 2010 Cebus xanthosternos 2000 2002 2004 Cercocebus atys lunulatus 2000 2002 2004 Cercocebus galeritus galeritus 2002 Cercocebus sanjei 2000 2002 2004 Cercopithecus roloway 2002 2006 2008 2010 Cercopithecus sclateri 2000 Eulemur cinereiceps 2004 2006 2008 Eulemur flavifrons 2008 2010 Galagoides rondoensis 2006 2008 2010 Gorilla beringei graueri 2010 Gorilla beringei beringei 2000 2002 2004 Gorilla gorilla diehli 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Hapalemur aureus 2000 Hapalemur griseus alaotrensis 2000 Hoolock hoolock 2006 2008 Hylobates moloch 2000 Lagothrix flavicauda 2000 2006 2008 2010 Leontopithecus caissara 2000 2002 2004 Leontopithecus chrysopygus 2000 Leontopithecus rosalia 2000 Lepilemur sahamalazensis 2006 Lepilemur septentrionalis 2008 2010 Loris tardigradus nycticeboides
    [Show full text]
  • Levels of Affiliation Between Members of a Captive Family Group of White-Faced Saki Monkeys (Pithecia Pitheciay)
    Lambda Alpha Journal Page 39 Volume 39, 2009 Levels of Affiliation between Members of a Captive Family Group of White-faced Saki Monkeys (Pithecia pitheciay) Angela Toole Department of Anthropology University of Missouri- St. Louis White-faced saki monkeys (Pithecia pitheciai are monogamous primates rarely studied in the wild. Little is known about their affiliative behavior. This study examined levels of affiliation between five members of a captive family group of white-faced saki monkeys at the St. Louis Zoo from October to November 2008. I collected twenty hours of data on the affiliative behavior of the five member group. This data consisted of focal animal samples, nearest neighbor focal animal samples, and interaction matrices of affiliative behaviors to determine the differences in levels of affiliation between male and female parent sakis, and male and female offspring. I found that male and female offspring tend to affiliate more than male offspring do with each other. The male parent rarely affiliated with his female offspring while the female parent affiliated with both her male and female offspring. The bonded pair affiliated infrequently and were rarely observed in proximity of each other (only 1 % of the observed time was spent in close proximity). These results differ from the findings of studies of the affiliative behaviors of the closely related titi monkeys (Callicebus sp.). Previous studies of captive titi monkeys show that affiliation tends to be higher between the bonded pair than between the parents and their offspring and that bonded pairs of titi monkeys display "jealousy behaviors" when intruders enter their group.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Litterature Review of the Spidermonkey, Ateles Sp
    A literature review of the spider monkey, Ateles sp., with special focus on risk for extinction Julia Takahashi Supervisor: Jens Jung Department of Animal Environment and Health _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet Examensarbete 2008:49 Fakulteten för veterinärmedicin och ISSN 1652-8697 husdjursvetenskap Uppsala 2008 Veterinärprogrammet Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Degree project 2008:49 Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and ISSN 1652-8697 Animal Sciences Uppsala 2008 Veterinary Medicine Programme CONTENTS Sammanfattning ................................................................................................. 3 Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 Resumo .............................................................................................................. 4 Zusammenfassung ............................................................................................. 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 6 Taxonomy ....................................................................................................... 6 Anatomy and characteristics........................................................................... 9 Geographical distribution .............................................................................
    [Show full text]