DOCSLIB.ORG

Members Committee & Research Caucus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Members Committee & Research Caucus California State Senate Report of the Senate Rules Committee Summary of Expenditures Paid from Senate Operating Fund 12/1/2013 - 02/28/2014 Total Committee & Caucus & Floor General Overhead & Category Description Expenditures Members Research Leadership Support Services Employee Salaries & Benefits 25,627,409.18 10,871,771.49 6,033,566.83 1,460,345.27 7,261,725.59 Member Travel & Living IN 59,607.84 59,607.84 .00 .00 .00 Member Travel & Living OUT .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 Member Travel - Session 27,888.20 27,888.20 .00 .00 .00 Employee Travel - Per Diem 178,397.83 138,677.09 9,393.65 7,689.62 22,637.47 Automobile Expense 53,243.56 42,999.20 859.73 805.05 8,579.58 Automobile Repairs 27,623.91 .00 .00 .00 27,623.91 Building Expense 492,786.03 451,732.49 .00 .00 41,053.54 Telephone 7,834.29 7,870.69 63.60 .00 -100.00 Postage -967.22 143,407.86 780.51 .00 -145,155.59 Freight 11,542.01 8,381.71 436.62 12.79 2,710.89 Office Supplies 39,642.01 13,458.37 3,473.98 1,375.84 21,333.82 Printing & Duplicating 51,301.89 52,869.71 11,810.58 1,225.64 -14,604.04 Publications 14,565.09 10,772.42 2,263.93 526.96 1,001.78 Equipment & Furnishings 25,334.04 .00 195.29 663.57 24,475.18 Study Contracts 117,654.25 60,766.43 11,931.82 .00 44,956.00 Meals 866.74 .00 .00 .00 866.74 Ceremonies and Events 6,503.74 1,841.96 .00 .00 4,661.78 Miscellaneous 116,023.32 58,688.87 31,477.63 2,444.70 23,412.12 TOTAL Accounting Year-to-Date: 26,857,256.71 11,950,734.33 6,106,254.17 1,475,089.44 7,325,178.77 Senate Operating Fund AB23 Summary of Expenditures for Members' Offices Accounting Year Expenditures 12/1/2013 - 02/28/2014 Total Session Total Employee Expenditures Per Diem Expenditures Salaries & Member's Member's (All Funds) (Gen Fund) (Operating Fund) Benefits Office Travel IN Travel OUT Senator Joel Anderson 330,027.13 9,128.00 320,899.13 262,737.92 4,353.87 .00 Senator Jim Beall 269,527.67 9,128.00 260,399.67 240,688.03 421.24 .00 Senator Tom Berryhill 280,416.77 8,965.00 271,451.77 252,098.23 1,264.87 .00 Senator Marty Block 319,466.33 9,128.00 310,338.33 283,334.15 1,590.28 .00 Senator Ron Calderon 300,746.03 7,987.00 292,759.03 269,901.55 .00 .00 Senator Anthony Cannella 366,207.76 9,128.00 357,079.76 320,983.36 5,697.07 .00 Senator Ellen M. Corbett 271,407.63 9,128.00 262,279.63 239,080.10 3,472.91 .00 Senator Lou Correa 292,195.60 9,128.00 283,067.60 239,045.35 855.80 .00 Senator Kevin de León 366,673.37 9,128.00 357,545.37 329,985.99 1,244.50 .00 Senator Mark DeSaulnier 326,616.84 9,128.00 317,488.84 268,001.92 2,568.27 .00 Senator Noreen Evans 364,219.00 8,965.00 355,254.00 343,727.73 823.34 .00 Senator Jean Fuller 299,067.93 8,802.00 290,265.93 272,646.52 2,591.06 .00 Senator Ted Gaines 274,716.86 .00 274,716.86 259,959.84 41.87 .00 Senator Cathleen Galgiani 303,170.14 9,128.00 294,042.14 281,682.14 163.00 .00 Senator Loni Hancock 264,114.68 8,965.00 255,149.68 252,755.70 376.30 .00 Senator Ed Hernandez O.D. 253,163.39 8,802.00 244,361.39 222,704.64 433.92 .00 Senator Jerry Hill 331,047.96 9,128.00 321,919.96 300,256.63 1,308.27 .00 Senator Ben Hueso 341,589.33 9,128.00 332,461.33 293,477.32 467.80 .00 Senator Bob Huff 317,662.18 9,128.00 308,534.18 277,242.54 1,550.85 .00 Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson 343,420.46 8,965.00 334,455.46 303,133.88 625.65 .00 Senator Steve Knight 262,720.94 9,128.00 253,592.94 229,479.03 490.83 .00 Senator Ricardo Lara 313,127.08 8,802.00 304,325.08 282,234.52 1,442.36 .00 Senator Mark Leno 343,266.50 8,965.00 334,301.50 329,188.95 318.00 .00 Senator Ted W. Lieu 276,982.82 7,987.00 268,995.82 245,866.38 .00 .00 Senator Carol Liu 341,413.07 7,335.00 334,078.07 304,639.76 .00 .00 Senator Holly Mitchell 267,162.98 8,802.00 258,360.98 237,126.58 1,179.23 .00 Senator William W. Monning 264,117.06 9,128.00 254,989.06 232,893.25 3,146.09 .00 Senator Jim Nielsen 368,396.00 9,128.00 359,268.00 335,328.95 3,488.99 .00 Senator Alex Padilla 358,739.75 9,128.00 349,611.75 339,824.95 1,234.10 .00 Senator Fran Pavley 342,772.33 9,128.00 333,644.33 305,476.45 1,748.91 .00 Senator Richard D. Roth 248,509.28 7,944.16 240,565.12 223,243.76 1,275.90 .00 Senator Darrell Steinberg 198,911.50 .00 198,911.50 193,182.11 1,613.54 .00 Senator Norma Torres 317,265.79 9,128.00 308,137.79 277,077.63 1,427.48 .00 Senator Andy Vidak 344,493.69 9,128.00 335,365.69 289,591.98 1,745.24 .00 Senator Mimi Walters 315,656.42 8,802.00 306,854.42 267,578.87 2,518.89 .00 Senator Lois Wolk 323,284.57 9,128.00 314,156.57 293,813.57 467.80 .00 Senator Roderick D. Wright 258,094.07 5,216.00 252,878.07 238,767.03 941.83 .00 Senator Mark Wyland 365,618.76 6,099.98 359,518.78 245,643.77 233.90 .00 Senator Leland Y. Yee 335,181.95 9,128.00 326,053.95 291,173.64 5,207.98 .00 Retired Members 212,654.85 .00 212,654.85 196,196.77 1,275.90 .00 TOTAL Accounting Year: 12,273,826.47 323,092.14 11,950,734.33 10,871,771.49 59,607.84 .00 Senate Operating Fund AB23 Summary of Expenditures for Members' Offices Accounting Year Expenditures 12/1/2013 - 02/28/2014 Member's 1st Session Employee Senate Car Senate Car Senate Car Office Class Airfare Travel Travel Expense Rental Maintenance Gas Senator Joel Anderson .00 951.90 3,736.85 .00 .00 .00 Senator Jim Beall .00 .00 999.02 .00 .00 .00 Senator Tom Berryhill .00 .00 293.09 .00 .00 .00 Senator Marty Block .00 1,637.90 4,961.08 .00 .00 .00 Senator Ron Calderon .00 1,283.90 2,094.20 .00 .00 .00 Senator Anthony Cannella .00 .00 5,111.05 .00 .00 .00 Senator Ellen M. Corbett .00 .00 2,665.38 .00 .00 .00 Senator Lou Correa .00 1,497.90 4,173.34 .00 .00 .00 Senator Kevin de León .00 1,497.90 4,265.18 .00 .00 .00 Senator Mark DeSaulnier .00 .00 4,074.16 .00 .00 .00 Senator Noreen Evans .00 37.00 3,138.55 .00 .00 .00 Senator Jean Fuller .00 301.00 1,081.20 .00 .00 .00 Senator Ted Gaines .00 .00 1,577.62 .00 .00 .00 Senator Cathleen Galgiani .00 .00 1,498.62 .00 .00 .00 Senator Loni Hancock .00 .00 468.07 .00 .00 .00 Senator Ed Hernandez O.D. .00 1,273.90 1,957.75 .00 .00 .00 Senator Jerry Hill .00 .00 1,605.36 .00 .00 .00 Senator Ben Hueso .00 1,617.90 4,200.17 .00 .00 .00 Senator Bob Huff .00 1,273.90 6,465.21 .00 .00 .00 Senator Hannah-Beth Jackson .00 1,497.90 2,081.67 .00 .00 .00 Senator Steve Knight .00 1,497.90 893.02 .00 .00 .00 Senator Ricardo Lara .00 1,497.90 4,240.20 .00 .00 .00 Senator Mark Leno .00 .00 2,310.65 .00 .00 .00 Senator Ted W. Lieu .00 1,322.90 3,132.67 .00 .00 .00 Senator Carol Liu .00 1,284.00 11,176.38 .00 .00 .00 Senator Holly Mitchell .00 1,284.00 1,962.02 .00 .00 .00 Senator William W. Monning .00 .00 2,393.97 .00 .00 .00 Senator Jim Nielsen .00 .00 4,431.75 .00 .00 .00 Senator Alex Padilla .00 1,497.90 4,369.23 .00 .00 .00 Senator Fran Pavley .00 1,069.90 6,615.41 .00 .00 .00 Senator Richard D. Roth .00 1,487.90 1,848.60 .00 .00 .00 Senator Darrell Steinberg .00 .00 3,040.78 .00 .00 .00 Senator Norma Torres .00 1,487.90 1,640.33 .00 .00 .00 Senator Andy Vidak .00 .00 9,627.25 .00 .00 .00 Senator Mimi Walters .00 1,497.90 10,480.31 .00 .00 .00 Senator Lois Wolk .00 .00 5,084.98 .00 .00 .00 Senator Roderick D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State Issues
    Week of January 14, 2019 State Issues Legislative Analyst This week, the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO) released its overview of Governor Newsom’s budget proposal for FY Report on State 2019-20 that was presented last week, and saw a new leader selected to lead this non-partisan organization. The Budget Legislature appointed a new state Legislative Analyst to fill the role Mac Taylor has held for 10 years. They named Gabriel Petek to the post, who most recently worked for Standard and Poor’s Global Ratings San Francisco Office where he is currently the state’s primary credit analyst. He takes the reins on February 4. In addition to getting a new chief, the LAO released its overview of the Governor’s January budget highlighting that that state’s budget position continues to be strong. They also focus on the fact that the Governor’s proposed budget prioritizes the repayments of state debts and a great deal of one-time funding. Nearly half of the discretionary spending is earmarked to pay down state liabilities, including unfunded retirement liabilities and budget debts. Twenty-five (25) percent of the discretionary spending is for one time or temporary funding proposals, and 15 percent for discretionary reserves. The LAO applauds the Governor’s decision to focus on the repayment of state debts. The LAO points out one thing that many took note of – the Governor has outlined many priorities for budgetary spending. And at least some of the proposals are not fully fleshed out or reflected in the budget document. The LAO was not critical of this but pointed out that these un-finalized proposals give the Legislature the opportunity to weigh in with the Administration and have their say in its development.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Environmental Justice Scorecard 2 Championing Solutions to the Environmental Health and Climate Change Issues Facing Working Class Communities of Color
    CEJA’s 2nd Environmental Justice Scorecard The California Environmental Justice Alliance (CEJA) is proud to release our 2nd Environmental Justice Score- card for the 2014 Legislative Session. This scorecard is the only one in the state to assess how well California’s elected officials supported actions to address environmental issues that impact low-income communities and communities of color. Scorecard Methodology and Scoring We selected bills that CEJA as a coalition or our members publicly supported or opposed. We chose bills that were significant: they would either make important contributions to addressing environmental justice, or would enact policies detrimental to communities of color. In total, CEJA scored 13 bills. Senators were scored on a total of 11 bills and Assemblymembers on a total of 12 bills. Of the ten bills that made it to the Governor’s desk, he signed eight of them. Unfortunately, due to rule restrictions, Senate pro Tem De León was unable to cast his vote on a couple of measures included in our scorecard because he was engaged in helping to move other important measures on the Assembly floor, thus impacting his score. However, none of these bills were close votes and in both instances he had previously voted for the bills in committee. We believe his score would have been different if the Senate Rules had similar rules as the Assembly on such matters. About the California Environmental Justice Alliance The California Environmental Justice Alliance (CEJA) is a statewide coalition of grassroots, environmental jus- tice organizations. We are working to achieve environmental justice by organizing in low-income communities and communities of color – those most impacted by environmental hazards – and by pushing for policies at the federal, state, regional and local levels that protect public health and the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • CWA San Diego Action Alert Concerned Women for America of California - San Diego/Imperial Counties Thursday, May 13, 2004
    CWA San Diego Action Alert Concerned Women for America of California - San Diego/Imperial Counties Thursday, May 13, 2004 Thank you for continuing to pray and act on behalf of traditional marriage. AB 1967, the same-sex "marriage" bill, was placed in the Assembly Appropriations Committee suspense file on May 12, having passed the Assembly Judiciary Committee on April 20. This means the bill must be reviewed again because of its significant fiscal impact. If the bill is voted out of the suspense file by the committee, it will move to the Assembly floor before the end of the month. Action: Please encourage your congregation, friends, family and co-workers to take action for marriage before May 19, when the committee is scheduled to vote on its suspense file. While this is the next "deadline," our legislature's current composition sometimes results in unexpected rule changes, and deadlines are not always what they seem. Thus, it is only safe to say that AB 1967 will not be officially "dead" until May 28, when all bills must be through their house of origin. An updated bulletin insert is attached for use in churches this weekend. Please tell your assemblymember and our governor that same-sex "marriage" is a dangerous proposition for our society, our children and our religious freedom. Below is a sample letter to be used for e-mail purposes or as talking points for a phone call. You may cut, paste and amend this text or draft your own. Please be respectful. Your point is better made with strong arguments, rather than strong words.
    [Show full text]
  • NO on PROP 6!
    Dear Fellow Carpenter; lection Day is Tuesday, November 6. It is our chance to help Vote in the comfort of your home and mail in your ballot, making Eelect candidates who will support Carpenters and our families sure it is postmarked on or before November 6. If you forget to mail and help pass ballot measures that will create more jobs. To the ballot, you can also personally deliver it to your polling place do that, you must vote. If you don’t vote, you are helping elect on election day until 8:00pm. If you don’t have a vote by mail ballot, candidates who want to support policies that will reduce your you can vote at your polling place on election day between 7:00am pay and benefits, not to mention your job itself. By not voting you and 8:00pm. If you have any questions about these endorsements, also help pass those ballot measures that will hurt our jobs and call your local Carpenter facility or go to the Southwest Carpenters our families. website at www.swcarpenters.org. If you need to find your polling place, go to www.voterstatus.sos.ca.gov. The recommendations below were based on participation by carpenters at the local level. I believe our endorsements, Fraternally, especially in local races, are stronger if our local members are Randy Thornhill involved in the endorsement decision. Also, we have supported Executive Secretary-Treasurer candidates regardless of their political party as long as the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters candidate supports the Carpenters. SAN DIEGO & SUPT.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum 5.1
    Memorandum 5.1 DATE: January 4, 2021 TO: Alameda County Technical Advisory Committee FROM: Carolyn Clevenger, Deputy Executive Director of Planning and Policy Maisha Everhart, Director of Government Affairs and Communications SUBJECT: State and federal legislative activities update and approval of the 2021 Legislative Program Recommendation This item is to provide the Commission with an update on federal, state, regional, and local legislative activities and to approve the 2021 Alameda CTC Legislative Program. Summary Each year, Alameda CTC adopts a Legislative Program to provide direction for its legislative and policy activities for the year. The purpose of the Legislative Program is to establish funding, regulatory and administrative principles to guide Alameda CTC’s legislative advocacy. It is designed to be broad and flexible, allowing Alameda CTC to pursue legislative and administrative opportunities that may arise during the year, and to respond to political processes in the region as well as in Sacramento and Washington, D.C. Legislative, policy and funding partnerships throughout the Bay Area and California will be key to the success of the 2021 Legislative Program. The 2021 Alameda CTC Legislative Program retains many of the 2020 priorities and is divided into 5 sections: 1. Transportation Funding 2. Multimodal Transportation, Land Use, Safety and Equity 3. Project Delivery and Operations 4. Climate Change and Technology 5. Partnerships Attachment A details the Alameda CTC proposed 2021 Legislative Program. Background The purpose of the 2021 Alameda CTC Legislative Program is to establish funding, regulatory and administrative principles to guide Alameda CTC’s legislative advocacy in the coming year. The program is developed to be broad and flexible, allowing Alameda CTC to pursue legislative and administrative opportunities that may arise during the year, and to respond to the changing political processes in the region, as well as in Sacramento and Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012
    VERIZON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY – DECEMBER 2012 1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 20 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon in 2012. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Senior Vice President, Public Policy 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? and the government agencies administering the federal and individual state election laws.
    [Show full text]
  • SB 1440 – PADILLA Student Transfer Achievement Reform Act
    SB 1440 – PADILLA Student Transfer Achievement Reform Act Principal Co-Authors Speaker John Pérez, Assembly Members Paul Fong, Jim Beall, & Sam Blakeslee, Senate Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, Senator Gloria Romero Co-Authors Senators Roy Ashburn, Gilbert Cedillo, Lou Correa, Dave Cox, Bill Emmerson, Loni Hancock, Bob Huff, Carol Liu, Alan Lowenthal, Gloria Negrete McLeod, Fran Pavley, Curren Price, Audra Strickland, and Mark Wyland & Assembly Members Juan Arambula, Marty Block, Steven Bradford, Julia Brownley, Wilmer Amina Carter, Wesley Chesbro, Connie Conway, Mike Davis, Noreen Evans, Felipe Fuentes, Warren Furutani, Ted Gaines, Isadore Hall, Alyson Huber, Bonnie Lowenthal, Fiona Ma, Tony Mendoza, Bill Monning, Jim Nielsen, V. Manuel Perez, Anthony Portantino, Ira Ruskin, Jim Silva, Cameron Smyth, Sandré Swanson, and Tom Torlakson Summary As many as 100,000 state employees will be eligible to retire in the next five years. The U.S. SB 1440, The Student Transfer Achievement Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that 43% of Reform (STAR) Act, would increase the number the U.S. private labor force is also eligible to retire of students who successfully transfer from between 2004 and 2012. California Community Colleges (CCC) to the California State University system by establishing In addition, eight of the top ten fastest growing transfer degrees. Those who earn the new transfer occupations require postsecondary education and degree would be guaranteed admission to the six require a bachelor’s degree. California State University (CSU) with junior status. Clarifying and streamlining the process Since the adoption of the 1960 Master Plan for would result in students graduating more quickly Higher Education, preparing students to transfer to allowing community colleges and the CSU to a four-year university has been a core function of serve more students.
    [Show full text]
  • Border 2020 Quarterly Newsletter Region 9 California, Baja California, Arizona and Sonora Summer-Fall 2013
    Border 2020 Quarterly Newsletter Region 9 California, Baja California, Arizona and Sonora Summer-Fall 2013 www. epa. gov/bor der 2 020 This newsletter provides a summa r y of pa st quarter activities General Updates EPA and Cal/EPA Border Teams Brief Congressional & State Legislative Staff On July 30th, the Region 9 Border Team and Cal/EPA briefed Staff from 11 California Federal and State Congressional/Legislative Offices along the California-Mexico Border, in the EPA San Diego Border Office. Key briefing items included a brief showing of the Border 2012 accomplishments video, a summary of the new Border 2020 Program, 2-year action plans, upcoming programmatic priorities, and the Border Request for Proposal. Cal/EPA, represented by the leadership of the San Diego and Colorado River Water Boards, presented on current bi-national efforts focused on the New River and Tijuana River watersheds. The eleven representatives in attendance, included staff from the offices of Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer; Representatives Juan Vargas and Scott Peters; State Assembly Members Brian Jones, Shirley Weber, Lorena Gonzales, Toni Atkins and State Senators Marty Block, Mark Wyland and Ben Hueso. Contact: Brent Maier, 415-947-4256 EPA Border Program Engages HHS on Border Environmental Health Efforts On August 16th, members of the EPA Border Team briefed the new Executive Director of the U.S. Section of the U.S.-Mexico Border Health Commission (USMBHC), Jose Luis Velasco, on the draft Collaborative agreement between EPA, Border 2020, HHS and the USMBHC to improve the Environment and Public Health along the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Learn Which Candidates We Supported in Your Community PFIZER PAC ~ OUR VOICE in the POLITICAL PROCESS a Message from Rich Bagger, Chairman Pfizer PAC
    PFIZER PAC & CORPORATE POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS REPORT 2005 – 2006 CYCLE Learn which candidates we supported in your community PFIZER PAC ~ OUR VOICE IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS A Message From Rich Bagger, Chairman Pfizer PAC Dear Colleagues: One of our five immediate priorities at Pfizer is to engage more actively and meaningfully with patients, doctors, payers, governments and other key stakeholders. We’re reaching out to these important groups and working harder to meet their needs. We're also working harder to engage all stakeholders in the dialogue on health policy and actively participate in the discussion over how to improve the quality of healthcare, access to medicines, and incentives for innovation. Pfizer PAC is one of the key ways in which we engage with candidates for public office. Through Pfizer PAC, we support candidates who understand the importance of innovative life sciences companies like Pfizer in fighting disease, improving health outcomes, and ensuring access to vital medicines. This report includes a list of candidates and political committees that Pfizer PAC supported during the 2005-06 election cycle. I hope you will take some time to review this report and see which candidates Pfizer PAC supported in your region. This was a successful year for Pfizer PAC. In the past election cycle, Pfizer PAC supported more than 2,277 candidates from both political parties, and at all levels of government. You, and Pfizer colleagues across America, definitely made a difference this past year through Pfizer PAC, by supporting candidates for public office who value access and innovation in healthcare. Thank you for your support—this report explains how Pfizer PAC put your generous contributions to use.
    [Show full text]
  • A Changing Legislature? 12 Bogh (R) Leading Vs
    The State Results Are (Almost) In Results shown are as of noon on Nov. 6. Current outcomes for ballot measures, elected offices of interest to California hospitals Ballot Measures More Elections Election Results Timeline of Interest Coming? 1 County officials have 30 days to count ballots Pass Fail The following races could trigger and conduct a post-election audit. Final results Senate special elections: must be reported to the Secretary of State for the presidential contest by Dec. 1 and all other Leaning Authorizes $5.5 billion Prop. 14: • Los Angeles County Supervisor: contests by Dec. 4. The Secretary of State will Pass in general obligation bonds for the 2 Sen. Holly Mitchell (D-Los Angeles) 4 certify results on Dec. 11. Vote-by-mail ballots state’s stem cell research institute. defeated Los Angeles City postmarked on or before Election Day can Councilmember Herb Wesson arrive until Nov. 20 and still be counted. Leaning Prop. 15: A split roll property tax Fail that increases taxes by reassessing • San Diego County Supervisor: 6 business property every three years, Community College Board Member 3 including investor-owned hospitals. Nora Vargas leading vs. Sen. Ben Hueso (i)Scott Wilk (R) leading (D-San Diego) 9 5 vs. Kipp Mueller (D), CHA opposed 11 11 7 10 13 15 8 SD 21 Prop. 16: A Constitutional amendment that reinstates Rosilicie Ochoa affirmative action in university A Changing Legislature? 12 Bogh (R) leading vs. admissions and public hiring. Abigail Medina Races that will impact the makeup CHA supported (D), SD 23 of the Legislature Map shows Senate districts by party affiliation 17 14 Prop.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013–14 California Legislature
    Table of Contents California Legislature 2013-14 Table of Contents “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” I Table of Contents Table of Contents EDMUND G. BROWN JR. GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA III Table of Contents GAVIN NEWSOM LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR IV Table of Contents DARRELL STEINbeRG PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE V Table of Contents TONI G. ATKINS SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY VI Table of Contents NORA CAMPOS SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE OF THE ASSEMBLY VII Table of Contents Memoranda VIII Table of Contents CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE AT SACRAMENTO Biographies and Photographs of SENATE AND ASSEMBLY MEMBERS AND OFFICERS List of SENATE AND ASSEMBLY MEMBERS, OFFICERS, ATTACHES, COMMITTEES and RULES OF THE TWO HOUSES and Standards of Conduct of the Senate Together With a List of the Members of Congress, State Officers, Etc. 2013–14 REGULAR SESSION (2014 Edition) Convened December 3, 2012 Published July 2014 GREGORY SCHMIDT Secretary of the Senate E. DOTSON WILSON Chief Clerk of the Assembly IX Table of Contents SENATE LEADERSHIP President pro Tempore Darrell Steinberg (D) Majority Leader Ellen M. Corbett (D) Democratic Caucus Chair Jerry Hill Republican Leader Bob Huff Republican Caucus Chair Ted Gaines Senate Rules Committee: Darrell Steinberg (D) (Chair); Jean Fuller (R) (Vice Chair); Steve Knight (R); Ricardo Lara (D); Holly Mitchell (D). X Click on the description to direct you to the corresponding page you to the corresponding page CONTENTS PAge California Representatives in Congress........................ 13 Directory of State Officers...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Legislators of California
    The Legislators of California March 2011 Compiled by Alexander C. Vassar Dedicated to Jane Vassar For everything With Special Thanks To: Shane Meyers, Webmaster of JoinCalifornia.com For a friendship, a website, and a decade of trouble-shooting. Senator Robert D. Dutton, Senate Minority Leader Greg Maw, Senate Republican Policy Director For providing gainful employment that I enjoy. Gregory P. Schmidt, Secretary of the Senate Bernadette McNulty, Chief Assistant Secretary of the Senate Holly Hummelt , Senate Amending Clerk Zach Twilla, Senate Reading Clerk For an orderly house and the lists that made this book possible. E. Dotson Wilson, Assembly Chief Clerk Brian S. Ebbert, Assembly Assistant Chief Clerk Timothy Morland, Assembly Reading Clerk For excellent ideas, intriguing questions, and guidance. Jessica Billingsley, Senate Republican Floor Manager For extraordinary patience with research projects that never end. Richard Paul, Senate Republican Policy Consultant For hospitality and good friendship. Wade Teasdale, Senate Republican Policy Consultant For understanding the importance of Bradley and Dilworth. A Note from the Author An important thing to keep in mind as you read this book is that there is information missing. In the first two decades that California’s legislature existed, we had more individuals serve as legislators than we have in the last 90 years.1 Add to the massive turnover the fact that no official biographies were kept during this time and that the state capitol moved seven times during those twenty years, and you have a recipe for missing information. As an example, we only know the birthplace for about 63% of the legislators. In spite of my best efforts, there are still hundreds of legislators about whom we know almost nothing.
    [Show full text]