Seasonality and Frequency of Snake And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Seasonality and Frequency of Snake And WWW.IRCF.ORG/REPTILESANDAMPHIBIANSJOURNALTABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANSIRCF REPTILES • VOL15, &NO AMPHIBIANS 4 • DEC 2008 189 • 26(1):16–20 • APR 2019 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES Seasonality. Chasing Bullsnakes (Pituophis catenifer sayi and) in Wisconsin: Frequency of Snake On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 and. TheGoanna Shared History of Treeboas (Corallus Incursions grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: on an Australian A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 AgriculturalRESEARCH ARTICLES Institute and the Attitudes . The Texas Horned Lizard in Central and Western Texas ....................... Emily Henry, Jason Brewer, Krista Mougey, and Gad Perry 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida .............................................of StaffBrian RegardingJ. Camposano, Kenneth L. Krysko, Kevin M. Enge,Coexistence Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 CONSERVATION ALERT Matthew Mo . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 . More ThanP.O. Mammals Box A290, ............................................................................................................................... Sydney South, New South Wales 2000, Australia ([email protected])....................................... 223 . The “Dow Jones Index” of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................................................... 225 Photographs by the author. HUSBANDRY . Captive Care of the Central Netted Dragon ....................................................................................................... Shannon Plummer 226 Abstract.—A PROFILEnumber of snakes and goannas persist in areas frequented by humans, such as the Elizabeth Macarthur . Kraig Adler: A Lifetime Promoting Herpetology ................................................................................................ Michael L. Treglia 234 Agricultural Institute in New South Wales, Australia. This institute is used as both an office location and an agricultural demonstrationCOMMENTARY site, which inevitably results in snakes and goannas coming close to institute buildings, prompting con- cerns for human .safety.The Turtles Reports Have Been ofWatching snakes Me ........................................................................................................................and goannas within 100m of institute buildings Eric were Gangloff collected 238 over a three- year period; anBOOK analysis REVIEW of those data identified a seasonal pattern of incursions by three species between September and March. A short. Threatened verbal Amphibians survey ofrevealed the World editedthat by more S.N. Stuart, staff M. had Hoffmann, encountered J.S. Chanson, goannas N.A. Cox, than snakes. Most were cautious to curious when snakesR. Berridge, and P. goannasRamani, and B.E.were Young reported, .............................................................................................................. whereas only a minority admitted Robertto being Powell 243fearful when snakes were reported. CONSERVATION RESEARCH REPORTS: Summaries of Published Conservation Research Reports ................................. 245 NATURAL HISTORY RESEARCH REPORTS: Summaries of Published Reports on Natural History ................................. 247 uman interactions NEWBRIEFS with ............................................................................................................................... wildlife are complex. Herein, I report....................................................... on the seasonality 248and frequency of snake EDITORIAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 251 HInteractions can FOCUS be positive ON CONSERVATION when wildlife: A Project is valued You Can for Support ...............................................................................................and goanna incursions close to institute 252 buildings, and the either aesthetical, cultural, economic, or functional reasons results of a short verbal survey that gauged attitudes of insti- (Orams 2002; Wilkinson et al. 2014; Mo and Waterhouse tute staff regarding co-existence with snakes and goannas. 2015a). Conversely, conflicts arise from social, cultural, eco- nomic, political, or even environmentalFront Cover. factors Shannon (Barker Plummer. et Back Cover. Michael Kern Methods al. 2008; McClelland et al. 2011; TotatWhite et velleseque and Ward audant mo2011). TheTotat EMAI et velleseque is part audant of mo a 1,600-ha property approximately 70 estibus inveliquo velique rerchil estibus inveliquo velique rerchil Reptiles are among the least favorederspienimus, vertebrates quos accullabo. (Ceriaco Ilibus erspienimus,km southwest quos accullabo. of the Ilibus Sydney central business district (Fig. 1). 2012; Abell 2013). Members of theaut dolorgeneral apicto publicinvere pe dolumtend to aut dolor apicto invere pe dolum fugiatis maionsequat eumque fugiatis maionsequat eumque be more accommodating toward coexistencemoditia erere nonsediswith mammals,ma sectiatur moditia erere nonsedis ma sectia- birds, and fish than reptiles. For example,ma derrovitae urban voluptam, communi as quos - tur ma derrovitae voluptam, as ties in Australia develop overwhelmingaccullabo. attachments to local populations of iconic species such as the Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus; e.g., Ward and Close 2004; Lunney et al. 2010) and Powerful Owl (Ninox strenua; e.g., McNabb et al. 2007; Mo and Waterhouse 2015b). On the contrary, a common response to reptiles is a desire to have them removed, with licensed handlers able to generate some income from relocat- ing them (Shine and Koenig 2001). In Australia, a number of front-fanged venomous snakes (family Elapidae) and goannas (family Varanidae) have per- sisted in frequently-used areas (Butler et al. 2005; Shea 2010). The Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute (EMAI), situ- ated in Menangle, New South Wales, is an example of a well- Fig. 1. Layout of the Elizabeth Macarthur Agricultural Institute and its used facility vulnerable to incursions of snakes and goannas. location within the Sydney region. Copyright © 2019. Matthew Mo. All rights reserved. 16 IRCF Reptiles & Amphibians ISSN 1098-6324 MO IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS • 26(1):16–20 • APR 2019 Owned by the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries since 1990, the property has been used as both a departmental office location and an agricultural demonstra- tion site. The landscape is a mosaic of open woodland rem- nants and livestock paddocks on gently undulating terrain situated between the Nepean River and the Razor Back Range (Starr et al. 2004; Mo 2017, 2018). Large permanent dams have been established to provide water in addition to ephem- eral floodplains. Vegetation restoration has been progressively implemented to create conservation corridors throughout the property. The institute buildings occupy 11 ha of the EMAI property and are situated south of a large permanent dam. The juxtapositioning of the institute buildings and agricultural land had led to staff encounters with wildlife, which has raised health and safety concerns. European Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) warrens are common on the property, particularly Fig. 2. A Red-bellied Black Snake (Pseudechis porphyriacus) descending into in the immediate vicinity of buildings (Fig. 2). These warrens a rabbit warren. provide retreat sites for other species, including reptiles. I collected data on snake and goanna sightings within the site. Sightings were primarily gathered by reports from 100 m of institute buildings at EMAI between February 2014 institute staff, either reported to reception or me directly. and February 2017, during the time when I had an office at Reporting wildlife sightings to the institute reception had Table 1. Questions that formed the semi-structured survey on the attitudes of institute staff toward snakes and goannas. Question Response range Has the participant seen a snake on the institute grounds? Yes No How does the participant feel when they hear a snake has been sighted? Afraid Wary, but not afraid Curious, but not concerned Not curious or concerned What is the participant’s ideal standing in relation to snakes on the institute grounds? Never want to see them Don’t mind seeing them Want to see them Has the participant seen a goanna on the institute grounds? Yes No How does the participant feel when they hear a goanna has been sighted? Afraid Wary, but not afraid Curious, but not concerned Not curious or concerned What is the participant’s ideal standing in relation to goannas on the institute grounds? Never want to see them Don’t mind seeing them Want to see them 17 MO IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS • 26(1):16–20 • APR 2019 been a long-running practice intended for circulating precau- tionary notifications to staff. These reported sightings tended to be biased toward animals found directly outside institute buildings and potentially hazardous species, such as
Recommended publications
  • Broad-Headed Snake (Hoplocephalus Bungaroides)', Proceedings of the Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales (1946-7), Pp
    Husbandry Guidelines Broad-Headed Snake Hoplocephalus bungaroides Compiler – Charles Morris Western Sydney Institute of TAFE, Richmond Captive Animals Certificate III RUV3020R Lecturers: Graeme Phipps, Jacki Salkeld & Brad Walker 2009 1 Occupational Health and Safety WARNING This Snake is DANGEROUSLY VENOMOUS CAPABLE OF INFLICTING A POTENTIALLY FATAL BITE ALWAYS HAVE A COMPRESSION BANDAGE WITHIN REACH SNAKE BITE TREATMENT: Do NOT wash the wound. Do NOT cut the wound, apply substances to the wound or use a tourniquet. Do NOT remove jeans or shirt as any movement will assist the venom to enter the blood stream. KEEP THE VICTIM STILL. 1. Apply a broad pressure bandage over the bite site as soon as possible. 2. Keep the limb still. The bandage should be as tight as you would bind a sprained ankle. 3. Extend the bandage down to the fingers or toes then up the leg as high as possible. (For a bite on the hand or forearm bind up to the elbow). 4. Apply a splint if possible, to immobilise the limb. 5. Bind it firmly to as much of the limb as possible. (Use a sling for an arm injury). Bring transport to the victim where possible or carry them to transportation. Transport the victim to the nearest hospital. Please Print this page off and put it up on the wall in your snake room. 2 There is some serious occupational health risks involved in keeping venomous snakes. All risk can be eliminated if kept clean and in the correct lockable enclosures with only the risk of handling left in play.
    [Show full text]
  • Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist Reptiles
    Fowlers Gap Biodiversity Checklist ow if there are so many lizards then they should make tasty N meals for someone. Many of the lizard-eaters come from their Reptiles own kind, especially the snake-like legless lizards and the snakes themselves. The former are completely harmless to people but the latter should be left alone and assumed to be venomous. Even so it odern reptiles are at the most diverse in the tropics and the is quite safe to watch a snake from a distance but some like the Md rylands of the world. The Australian arid zone has some of the Mulga Snake can be curious and this could get a little most diverse reptile communities found anywhere. In and around a disconcerting! single tussock of spinifex in the western deserts you could find 18 species of lizards. Fowlers Gap does not have any spinifex but even he most common lizards that you will encounter are the large so you do not have to go far to see reptiles in the warmer weather. Tand ubiquitous Shingleback and Central Bearded Dragon. The diversity here is as astonishing as anywhere. Imagine finding six They both have a tendency to use roads for passage, warming up or species of geckos ranging from 50-85 mm long, all within the same for display. So please slow your vehicle down and then take evasive genus. Or think about a similar diversity of striped skinks from 45-75 action to spare them from becoming a road casualty. The mm long! How do all these lizards make a living in such a dry and Shingleback is often seen alone but actually is monogamous and seemingly unproductive landscape? pairs for life.
    [Show full text]
  • Brigalow Belt Bioregion – a Biodiversity Jewel
    Brigalow Belt bioregion – a biodiversity jewel Brigalow habitat © Craig Eddie What is brigalow? including eucalypt and cypress pine forests and The term ‘brigalow’ is used simultaneously to refer to; woodlands, grasslands and other Acacia dominated the tree Acacia harpophylla; an ecological community ecosystems. dominated by this tree and often found in conjunction with other species such as belah, wilga and false Along the eastern boundary of the Brigalow Belt are sandalwood; and a broader region where this species scattered patches of semi-evergreen vine thickets with and ecological community are present. bright green canopy species that are highly visible among the more silvery brigalow communities. These The Brigalow Belt bioregion patches are a dry adapted form of rainforest, relics of a much wetter past. The Brigalow Belt bioregion is a large and complex area covering 36,400 000ha. The region is thus recognised What are the issues? by the Australian Government as a biodiversity hotspot. Nature conservation in the region has received increasing attention because of the rapid and extensive This hotspot contains some of the most threatened loss of habitat that has occurred. Since World War wildlife in the world, including populations of the II the Brigalow Belt bioregion has become a major endangered bridled nail-tail wallaby and the only agricultural and pastoral area. Broad-scale clearing for remaining wild population of the endangered northern agriculture and unsustainable grazing has fragmented hairy-nosed wombat. The area contains important the original vegetation in the past, particularly on habitat for rare and threatened species including the, lowland areas. glossy black-cockatoo, bulloak jewel butterfl y, brigalow scaly-foot, red goshawk, little pied bat, golden-tailed geckos and threatened community of semi evergreen Biodiversity hotspots are areas that support vine thickets.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Reptiles of the Brigalow Belt Management Needs Knowledge
    Threatened Reptiles of the Brigalow Belt Management Needs Knowledge Dr Simon Hudson, CEnvP EIANZ Threatened Species Forum, Townsville, 6 Sep 2013 Why Reptiles? Often a focus on charismatic megafauna – “iconic” (usually meaning furred or feathered) Many reptiles are also iconic Many are very poorly known Many species are cryptic and difficult to survey Present some special difficulties Threatened Brigalow Belt Reptiles # # Terrestrial reptiles (i.e. not freshwater turtles or saltwater crocodile) Common Name EPBC Act NC Act LIZARDS Retro slider EE five-clawed worm-skink VE collared delma VV yakka skink VV Darling Downs earless dragon E striped-tailed delma* V brigalow scaly-foot* V golden-tailed gecko NT SNAKES ornamental snake VV Dunmall’s snake VV grey snake E woma NT common death adder NT yellow-naped snake NT *De-listed from the EPBC Act in May 2013 The Brigalow Belt and the modelled distribution of the EPBC-listed Brigalow Belt reptiles. Source: SEWPAC 2011 Threatened Brigalow Belt Reptiles yakka skink, Egernia rugosa Dunmall’s snake, Furina dumalli brigalow scaly-foot, Paradelma orientalis ornamental snake, Denisonia maculata Photos by Stewart Macdonald: Used with permission. SEWPAC conditions Examples from recent EPBC approval conditions for large Qld projects Disturbance limits (ha) imposed on potential habitat for EPBC-listed threatened reptiles Common Name APLNG QCLNG GLNG Alpha Mine Alpha Rail brigalow scaly-foot 774.22 # 235 205.3 TBD* 189 yakka skink 73.44 343 119.9 8,152 812 Dunmall’s snake 262.49 - 205.3 ornamental snake - - 44.0 1,543 251* Retro slider TBD* TBD* collared delma - - 41.6 TOTAL PROJECT AREA 572,700 450,000 688,700 20,603 3,450 Values taken from EPBC approvals 2009/4974 (APLNG), 2008/4398 (QCLNG, including referral) and 2008/4059 (GLNG) and 2008/4648 (Alpha mine & rail).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Assessment Report Lot 2AB132 and 3AB51 Report
    Ecology Assessment Report Lot 2AB132 and 3AB51 Report Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document Conventions The following terms in this document apply: • Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action • Should indicates a recommended course of action • May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document Custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Team Leader. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from Document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Team Leader. Doc Ref: Q-4200-15-RP-1002 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 90 Approvals, Land & Stakeholder Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report Lot 2AB132 and 3AB51 Report Table of Contents 1. Definitions & Abbreviations ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Environmental Report
    Darwin 10 MTPA LNG Facility Public Environmental Report March 2002 Darwin 10 MTPA LNG Facility Public Environmental Report March 2002 Prepared for Phillips Petroleum Company Australia Pty Ltd Level 1, HPPL House 28-42 Ventnor Avenue West Perth WA 6005 Australia by URS Australia Pty Ltd Level 3, Hyatt Centre 20 Terrace Road East Perth WA 6004 Australia 12 March 2002 Reference: 00533-244-562 / R841 / PER Darwin LNG Plant Phillips Petroleum Company Australia Pty Ltd ABN 86 092 288 376 Public Environmental Report PUBLIC COMMENT INVITED Phillips Petroleum Company Australia Pty Ltd, a subsidiary of Phillips Petroleum Company, proposes the construction and operation of an expanded two-train Liquefied Natural Gas facility with a maximum design capacity of 10 million tonnes per annum (MTPA). The facility will be located at Wickham Point on the Middle Arm Peninsula adjacent to Darwin Harbour near Darwin, NT. The proposed project will include gas liquefication, storage and marine loading facilities and a dedicated fleet of ships to transport LNG product. A subsea pipeline supplying natural gas from the Bayu-Undan field to Wickham Point and a similar, but smaller 3 MTPA LNG plant were the subject of a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment process and received approval from Commonwealth and Northern Territory Environment Ministers during 1998. The environmental assessment of the expanded LNG facility is being conducted at the Public Environmental Report (PER) level of the Northern Territory Environmental Assessment Act and the Commonwealth Environmental Protection (Impact of Proposals) Act. The draft PER describes the expanded LNG facility with particular emphasis on its differences from the previously approved LNG facility and addresses the potential environmental impacts and mitigation measures associated with the project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Function of the Hyalectan Class of Proteoglycans and Their Binding Partners During Vertebrate Development
    In: Advances in Medicine and Biology. Volume 52 ISBN: 978-1-62081-314-0 Editor: Leon V. Berhardt © 2012 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. No part of this digital document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted commercially in any form or by any means. The publisher has taken reasonable care in the preparation of this digital document, but makes no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of information contained herein. This digital document is sold with the clear understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, medical or any other professional services. Chapter II The Function of the Hyalectan Class of Proteoglycans and Their Binding Partners during Vertebrate Development Frédéric Brunet,1 ,* Christopher Kintakas,2 Adam D. Smith2 and Daniel R. McCulloch2,† 1Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, UMR5242 CNRS/INRA/Université Claude Bernard Lyon I/ENS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Lyon, France, 2Molecular and Medical Research (MMR) Strategic Research Centre, Molecular Medicine Research Facility, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Australia Abstract The hyalectan family of extracellular matrix (ECM) chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans comprises aggrecan, brevican, neurocan and versican. Although they share common structural domains including a G1 domain that is invariably linked to hyaluronan, their tissue distribution and biological roles in vertebrates are diverse. During vertebrate embryonic development, complex interactions between cells and their surrounding ECM precede profound cellular behaviour and morphogenetic events. Studies in several vertebrate species have identified specific roles for the hyalectans in numerous embryonic processes from early through late embryogenesis that are necessary for shaping the body plan and subsequent morphogenesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Code of Practice Captive Reptile and Amphibian Husbandry
    Department of Environment and Heritage Protection Code of Practice Wildlife management Captive reptile and amphibian husbandry Captive reptile and amphibian husbandry Nature Conservation Act 1992 Page 1 of 45 • 121220 Department of Environment and Heritage Protection www.ehp.qld.gov.au ABN 46 640 294 485 Code of Pactice Captive reptile and amphibian husbandry Table of Content 1. About this code ........................................................................................................................5 2. Reptiles and amphibians of Queensland ................................................................................6 3. Definitions................................................................................................................................. 6 4. Aims of herpetology .................................................................................................................6 5. Purpose of code .......................................................................................................................7 6. Acquisition of reptiles and amphibians ..................................................................................7 7. Selling and giving away reptiles and amphibians ..................................................................8 8. Take from the wild ....................................................................................................................8 9. Repatriation of the progeny of wild-caught amphibians .......................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Australia Tropical Rainforests
    Conservation Management Zones of Australia Eastern Australia Tropical Forests and Woodlands Prepared by the Department of the Environment Acknowledgements This project and its associated products are the result of collaboration between the Department of the Environment’s Biodiversity Conservation Division and the Environmental Resources Information Network (ERIN). Invaluable input, advice and support were provided by staff and leading researchers from across the Department of Environment (DotE), Department of Agriculture (DoA), the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the academic community. We would particularly like to thank staff within the Wildlife, Heritage and Marine Division, Parks Australia and the Environment Assessment and Compliance Division of DotE; Nyree Stenekes and Robert Kancans (DoA), Sue McIntyre (CSIRO), Richard Hobbs (University of Western Australia), Michael Hutchinson (ANU); David Lindenmayer and Emma Burns (ANU); and Gilly Llewellyn, Martin Taylor and other staff from the World Wildlife Fund for their generosity and advice. Special thanks to CSIRO researchers Kristen Williams and Simon Ferrier whose modelling of biodiversity patterns underpinned identification of the Conservation Management Zones of Australia. Image Credits Front Cover: Wanggoolba Creek, Fraser Island – Peter Lik Page 4: Glass House Mountains National Park – Peter Lik Page 10: Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) – Dan Lunney Page 15: Kenilworth State Forest – Peter Lik Page 18: Up Hill Inlet, Whitsunday Island – Ben
    [Show full text]
  • Wet Tropics Bioregion Reptiles Species List
    Wet Tropics Bioregion Reptiles Species List NCA Key C - Common, V – Vulnerable, NT – Near threatened, E – Endangered, Introduced - Scientific Name Common Name NCA Acalyptophis peronii C Acanthophis antarcticus common death adder NT Acanthophis praelongus northern death adder C Acrochordus arafurae Arafura file snake C Acrochordus granulatus little file snake C Aipysurus duboisii Dubois’s sea snake C Aipysurus mosaicus mosaic sea snake C Amolosia lesueurii Lesueur’s velvet gecko C Amolosia rhombifer zig-zag gecko C Anomalopus gowi C Antaioserpens warro robust burrowing snake NT Antaresia maculosa spotted python C Aspidites melanocephalus black-headed python C Astrotia stokesii C Bellatorias frerei major skink C Boiga irregularis brown tree snake C Cacophis churchilli C Calyptotis thorntonensis NT Caretta caretta loggerhead turtle E Carlia jarnoldae C Carlia longipes C Carlia munda C Carlia rhomboidalis C Carlia rostralis C Carlia rubrigularis C Carlia schmeltzii C Carlia storri C Carlia vivax C Carphodactylus laevis chameleon gecko C Chelodina canni Cann’s longneck turtle C Chelonia mydas green turtle V Chlamydosaurus kingii frilled lizard C Coeranoscincus frontalis NT Crocodylus johnstoni Australian freshwater crocodile C Crocodylus porosus estuarine crocodile V Cryptoblepharus adamsi Adams’ snake-eyed skink C Cryptoblepharus litoralis litoralis coastal snake-eyed skink C Cryptoblepharus metallicus metallic snake-eyed skink C Cryptoblepharus plagiocephalus sensu lato C Cryptoblepharus virgatus striped snake-eyed skink C Cryptophis nigrescens
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Fauna
    NSW WESTERN REGIONAL ASSESSMENTS Nandewar Biodiversity surrogates Vertebrate fauna Final Report Nand05 September 2004 RESOURCE AND CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT COUNCIL NSW WESTERN REGIONAL ASSESSMENTS Nandewar Biodiversity surrogates Vertebrate fauna Mick Andren Conservation Assessment & Data Unit Department of Environment & Conservation Project Number NAND05 RESOURCE AND CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT COUNCIL INFORMATION This project has been funded and coordinated by the Resource and Conservation Division (RACD) of the NSW Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources and the Department of Environment and Conservation for the Resource and Conservation Assessment Council (RACAC) © Crown (September 2004) NSW Government ISBN 1 74029 205 7 Preferred way to cite this publication: Andren, M.J. 2004. Nandewar biodiversity surrogates: vertebrate fauna. Report for the Resource and Conservation Assessment Council (RACAC), NSW Western Regional Assessments, coordinated by NSW Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources, Project no. NAND05. Department of Environment and Conservation, Coffs Harbour. For more information and for information on access to data, contact: Resource and Conservation Division, Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources P.O. Box 39 SYDNEY NSW 2001 Phone: 02 9228 6586 Fax: 02 9228 6411 Email: [email protected] Author: Mick Andren Cover photo: Border thick-tailed gecko Underwoodisaurus sphyrurus Phil Spark Disclaimer While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of printing, the State of New South Wales, its agents and employees, do not assume any responsibility and shall have no liability, consequential or otherwise, of any kind, arising from the use of or reliance on any of the information contained in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Impact Study
    South Walker Creek Mulgrave Resource Access: Stage 2C (MRA2C) EPBC 2017-7957 Appendix E: Ecological Impact Study Mulgrave Stage 2C Ecological Impact Study Assessment of Matters of National Environmental Significance Prepared for BHP 19 July 2018 Mulgrave Stage 2C Impact Assessment DOCUMENT TRACKING Item Detail Project Name Mulgrave Stage 2C Ecological Impact Study / MRA2C Preliminary Documentation Project Number 2251 / 8852 Liz Fisher Project Manager (07) 3503 7194 471 Adelaide St, Brisbane QLD 4000 Prepared by Loren Appleby, Renee Whitchurch, Jessie McCudden & Liz Fisher Reviewed by Ailsa Kerswell & Tom Kaveney Approved by Ailsa Kerswell Status FINAL Last saved on 19 July 2018 Cover photo Carborough Creek, ELA 2016 This report should be cited as ‘Eco Logical Australia 2018. Mulgrave Stage 2C Ecological Impact Study. Prepared for BHP.’ Disclaimer This document may only be used for the purpose for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the contract between Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd and BHP. The scope of services was defined in consultation with BHP, by time and budgetary constraints imposed by the client, and the availability of reports and other data on the subject area. Changes to available information, legislation and schedules are made on an ongoing basis and readers should obtain up to date information. Eco Logical Australia Pty Ltd accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report and its supporting material by any third party. Information provided is not intended to be a substitute for site specific assessment or legal advice in relation to any matter.
    [Show full text]