Washington Allston and Edgar Allan Poe's Mandate for the American Artist
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. University Microfilms International A Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 313/761-4700 800/521-0600 Order Number 9303960 Smashing the monuments and saving the pedestals: Washington Allston and Edgar Allan Poe's mandate for the American artist Weston, Debra Faye, Ph.D. The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, 1992 Copyright ©1992 by Weston, Debra Faye. All rights reserved. 300 N. ZeebRd. Ann Aibor, MI 48106 SMASHING THE MONUMENTS AND SAVING THE PEDESTALS: WASHINGTON ALLSTON AND EDGAR ALLAN POE'S MANDATE FOR THE AMERICAN ARTIST by Debra Weston A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School at Hie University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Greensboro 1992 Approved by Dissertation/Advisor APPROVAL PAGE This dissertation has been approved by the following committee of the Faculty of the Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro. Dissertation Advisor Committee Members {lyj (Al /!_ - _ Cu^jct 7, jyy-L. Date 'of Acceptance by Committee 7 /9<7z- Date df Final Oral Examination ii © by Debra Weston 1992 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge my gratitude to those members of my committee, Murray Arndt, Charles Davis, Denise P iker and Jim Evans for their assistance throughout the course of this project. I would especially like to thanks Drs. Arndt and Davis for not only their insightful suggestions and their reading along the way, but for their support and encouragement in seeing this project to its completion. Thanks are also due to those faculty members who offered their knowledge and advice on various aspects of this work: Robert Calhoun, Robert Rosthal, Mark Gottsegen, Robert Langenfeld and Carl Goldstein. Also thanks to those members of the library staff who offered advice and assistance: Mark Schumacher, Kathy Levinson, Gaylor Callahan and Nancy Fogerty and also to Katherine Pollock and Kathleen Driskell who helped with typing and editing. A veiy special thanks goes to Mark Branson who not only offered his time and talents for proofreading and help in research but whose support and friendship during this time have been invaluable. My greatest debt, however, is to my parents. Their love and support has made all the difference. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page APPROVAL PAGE ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Ill CHAPTER INTRODUCTION 1 Introduction Content Notes 26 I. LIFE IN THE SOUTH 31 Chapter I Content Notes 58 II. LIFE IN THE NORTH 70 Chapter II Content Notes 131 III. THE ROLE OF THE ARTIST: ALLSTON'S MANDATE 168 Chapter III Content Notes 209 IV. THE ROLE OF THE ARTIST: POE'S MANDATE 252 Chapter IV Content Notes 291 WORKS CITED 301 iv WESTON, DEBRA, Ph.D. Smashing the Monuments and Saving the Pedestals: Washington Allston and Edgar Allan Poe's Mandate for the American Artist. (1992). Directed by Dr. Murray Arndt. 318 pp. The purpose of this study is to examine the role of the artist in nineteenth-century America as it was conceived by Washington Allston and Edgar Allan Poe. Washington Allston was the first American painter and Edgar Allan Poe the first American poet to define their aesthetic theories and practice in an attempt to fashion a more definitive and prominent role for the American artist. Allston's and Poe's contributions as artists and aesthetic theorists are significant in that both men seek to construct a mandate for the artist in an American environment void of both a native tradition and the necessary resources to promote and sustain American art and artists. In an effort to overcome these obstacles, Allston and Poe find themselves attempting to reconcile a number of paradoxes in their mandates: questions of the artist as elitist or democrat, the artist as aesthete or instructor and the artist as advocate of the traditional or the original. These were all issues confronted and reconciled in their mandates. For Allston and Poe the reconciliation of these paradoxes is, in turn, the similarity of their visions. Moreover, from a biographical perspective the lives and careers of Allston and Poe, each rife with ironies, similarly parallel. Both men spent childhoods in privileged circumstances in the antebellum South and adulthoods in a constant struggle with poverty in an industrial and unsympathetic North. Much of the ideology that shapes their mandates can be seen as a direct result of the social, cultural and political conflicts that existed between these two environments. These regional conflicts also have a direct relation to the ultimate failure of Allston and Poe to realize their mandates. As Romantic artists in a period when Ralph Waldo Emerson and Transcendentalist thought was considered the paradigm of American Romanticism, Allston and Poe found themselves on the fringe of this Romantic movement: neither man could accept the democracy, liberalism, or the theology inherent in Emersonian philosophy. As a result of both choice and circumstance Allston and Poe remained aloof from the mainstream of American Romanticism, with their mandates largely ignored. The importance then of Allston and Poe as aesthetic theorists, and indeed as American artists, is their desire to both recognize and rectify these paradoxes inherent in both the role of the artist and in American society. Given this, Allston's and Poe's conception of the American artist's mandate was a truly independent one. 1 INTRODUCTION That Edgar Allan Poe did not like either the painting or poetry of Washington Allston should not surprise anyone familiar with Allston's work or Poe's criticism. In his work on Autography, Poe writes of Allston's paintings: "... the most noted of them are not to our taste," and on Allston's poetry:"... the faults of his pen and pencil are identical" (Works 9: 302f). Critics cannot fault either man for his consistency. Present research has not uncovered any account of Allston's judgment on the younger Poe, even though Allston was certainly familiar with that poetry of Poe's appearing in the 1842 edition of Rufus Griswold's The Poets and Poetry of America. This first edition of Griswold's perennial anthology1 was dedicated to Allston as "the eldest of the living poets in America and the most illustrious of her painters" (iii). Readers of Griswold's dedication may concede a degree of correctness in his acknowledgement of Allston's place in American letters—at this time and in this volume. By the 1840s Allston had, for many Americans, answered the call to lead the New World in its cultural expression, for, whatever his successes and failures, Allston had become America's idea of an artist. His career as an American artist indicates the same level of promise and disappointment that readers find in Griswold's anthology. 2 In truth, Allston, like many of the writers included in Poets and Poetry of America, is just another of the "Sunday poets," as they were defined by an anonymous reviewer of this first edition in the North American Review, yet, for this reviewer Allston's work has "a moderate share of poetic faculty [and a] good deal of poetic feeling" (6). Allston's prominence in the anthology (in addition to the dedication Griswold also gives a full page biographical introduction as well as several pages of Allston's poetry) is testimony to Griswold's critical bias and further evidence of his notoriously poor critical judgment. For example, not only does this edition fail to recognize the merits of a Longfellow, Lowell, or Poe compared to a Charles Fenno Hoffman, Lydia Sigoumey, or even an Allston, but both the diversity and disparity of the volume also make the case clear: Griswold's dedication notwithstanding, America's literaiy tradition still lacked direction and leadership. Even Griswold seems somewhat aware of this absence of leadership, for in his "Historical Introduction" he adds his voice to the general call that American writers need to be "free from the vassalage of opinion and style which is produced by the constant study of the literature of that nation whose language we speak" (v). Allston, the "eldest of the living poets" at age 63 has neither the skill, energy, or desire to answer Griswold's call to become a literary pioneer. The task is left for some other writer to pick up, and to "free" American writers from their "vassalage" in much the same 3 way the younger Allston had been able to successfully "liberate" American painters, earning for himself the accolade as "the most illustrious of [American] painters." This leadership that Griswold, and many others, called for and that Allston is too old to consider seems to have fallen to Edgar Allan Poe and, in retrospect, Poe's place on the fringe of American letters In 1842 served him and his art well, considering the obstacles nineteenth century America hurled in the paths of her artists.