DOCSLIB.ORG

Large-Scale Expansion of Marine Protected Area Networks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Large-Scale Expansion of Marine Protected Area Networks PARKS VOL 24.2 NOVEMBER 2018 LARGE‐SCALE EXPANSION OF MARINE PROTECTED AREA NETWORKS: LESSONS FROM AUSTRALIA James A. Fitzsimons1,2* and Geoff Wesco2 *Corresponding author: jfi[email protected] 1The Nature Conservancy, Suite 2‐01, 60 Leicester Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia 2School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood VIC 3125, Australia ABSTRACT Australia was one of the first countries to declare a marine protected area (MPA) in 1879, but it was not until the 1960s and 1970s, in efforts to protect the Great Barrier Reef, that marine protection was considered in a concerted way. The more recent development of MPA networks (or systems) by governments in state, territory and national (Commonwealth) jurisdictional waters has again placed Australia in the global spotlight in MPA development. We assembled the experiences of MPA representatives from government agencies, non-government organisations, academia and industry (in the form of commissioned written book chapters) to describe various aspects of MPAs in Australia, from the history, successes and challenges in creating jurisdictional networks, to the science, economics and legal aspects of Australian MPA networks, to different sectoral perspectives. Key themes are discussed and include: 1) Marine protected areas are always contested (at first), 2) Jurisdiction-wide network declaration versus single MPA declarations, each have pros and cons, 3) For federal systems of government, coordination between the jurisdictions is important, 4) Fishery reserves as the first MPAs ‘muddy the waters’ for the objectives of modern MPAs, 5) A multitude of categories and zones and uses has also confused the MPA concept, 6) Multi-use versus no take: proving the benefits and the need for clear targets for each type, 7) Acknowledging the gap between pure science and realpolitik in the placement of MPAs, 8) Involvement of Indigenous communities in MPAs has been slower than for terrestrial protected areas but improving. The recent and substantial changes to the Australian Government’s historic 2012 declaration of a network of MPAs across its exclusive economic zone are also discussed. Key words: marine protected areas, marine parks, protected area networks, zoning, marine conservation, land use allocation INTRODUCTION Marine Park in 1975 drew international attention to Australia was among the first countries in the world to Australia at the time. The more recent development of establish a national park on land, with the Royal MPA networks1 by governments in state, territory and National Park near Sydney declared in 1879. Less well national (Commonwealth) jurisdictional waters has known is that the Royal National Park included an area again placed Australia in the global spotlight in MPA of intertidal and close inshore marine areas, development. constituting what could be the oldest marine protected area (MPA) (in the modern sense) in the world (Brown, Australia is an island continent with an ocean territory 2002), noting that there were traditionally managed that is the third largest on Earth and Australians are marine areas managed for conservation in other parts of mostly coastal dwellers – 85 per cent of Australians live the world pre-dating this. within 50 km of the coast (Trewin, 2004). Today, Australia has more than 327,790,000 ha of sea declared Although the national park network (or system) grew in as MPAs, comprising almost 36 per cent of its waters. popularity on land and expanded progressively since This represents a nearly five-fold expansion from 7.1 per that early declaration, it was not until the late 1960s and cent in 2002 (Taylor et al., 2014). The global coverage of early 1970s when there were proposals to drill for oil on MPAs in late 2014 was 3.4 per cent of waters reserved the Great Barrier Reef that serious attention was paid to (Spalding & Hale, 2016; up from 1.6 per cent in 2010, establishing protected areas in marine waters in Tratham et al., 2012). Marine national parks and other Australia. The declaration of the Great Barrier Reef highly protected areas (IUCN Categories I–III) grew 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.PARKS‐24‐2JAF.en PARKS VOL 24.2 NOVEMBER 2018 | 19 Fitzsimons and Wesco nearly seven-fold, to cover from 2 per cent to 13.5 per sectoral perspectives (Fitzsimons & Wescott, 2016). The cent of Australian waters, up to 2014 (Taylor et al., findings from these chapters are synthesised in this 2014) (Figure 1 – but see ‘Recent developments’ section paper based on the common themes raised. below). As most countries around the world seek to build their Like the approach on land, the development of MPA MPA networks in response to commitments they have networks in Australia has, over the past two decades, made under the Convention on Biological Diversity, the been guided by the principles of comprehensiveness, lessons from Australia are likely to be even more timely. adequacy and representativeness, using bioregions as a Past compilations of differing perspectives of MPA basis to guide priorities (ANZECC TFMPA, 1998; development and implementation have either been at a Commonwealth of Australia, 2006; Australian more general level (e.g. Claudet, 2011; Day et al., 2015) Government, 2007). As a federated nation, the six state or are not particularly recent (e.g. Beumer et al., 2003). governments and the Northern Territory generally have This paper seeks out common lessons, both positive and responsibility for waters within 3 nautical miles of the negative, acquired from the Australian experience coast and the (federal) Australian Government for during the recent rapid expansion of MPAs, particularly waters beyond 3 nautical miles within Australia’s over the past two decades. Exclusive Economic Zone. Thus, separate MPA networks have been created for each of these KEY THEMES jurisdictions under different approaches, policies and There were a number of clearly recurring themes and legislation, but with the more recent aim of a more lessons that emerged from the analysis of lessons for consistent and uniform approach to MPA network creating MPA networks in Australia, as well as points of principles. difference. These are described under separate headings below. However, the establishment of MPAs has not been without controversy and, in some cases, a decline in Marine protected areas are always contested (at political support. Despite the significant activity, first) discussion and debate around MPAs in Australia, there In almost all Australian jurisdictions, and particularly in have been few attempts to bring together the history, the last two decades, the establishment of MPAs, either current status and future directions of each of the singly or as part of networks, has been contested, Australian MPA networks (national, territory and state) especially where this has placed restrictions on fishing or to align different perspectives from the various or other extractive industries (e.g. Wilson, 2016; sectors on MPA concepts more broadly. To fill this void, Thomas & Hughes, 2016; Wescott, 2016; Clarke, 2016; a recent project has assembled the experiences (in the Edyvane & Blanch, 2016; Meder, 2016). This form of commissioned chapters for a book, Big, Bold contestation is reflected in other countries as well (e.g. and Blue: Lessons from Australia’s Marine Protected Spalding & Hale, 2016). In Australia, for example, Areas (Fitzsimons & Wescott, 2016), of MPA approximately 740,000 submissions were received in representatives from government agencies, non- the public consultation periods process for the government organisations, academia and industry to establishment of the Commonwealth Marine Reserve describe various aspects of MPA networks in Australia. networks and related management plans (prior to their These experts were chosen by the authors based on review in 2017) (see also Wescott & Fitzsimons, 2011). their strong knowledge of the particular topic relating to The majority of these were campaign submissions (both MPA networks (e.g. Indigenous involvement, legal for and against the marine reserve networks proposals; frameworks, etc.) and/or involvement in creating MPA Cochrane, 2016; Smyth, 2016). This contestation networks in different jurisdictions, and they were asked involved non-coastal waters that most Australians have to write to predefined chapter templates. This book never seen, or are likely to ever visit. The subsequent covered from the history, successes and challenges in review of the reserve network (and further rounds of creating jurisdictional networks (in states and Northern public consultation) was prompted by the considerable Territory coastal waters within 3 nautical miles and in pressure from user groups, with the appointment of two Australian Government-controlled waters – Australia’s “expert panels [to] help restore confidence in Exclusive Economic Zone beyond 3 nautical miles, the Commonwealth marine reserves” by providing “advice Great Barrier Reef and Australia’s Antarctic and sub- to the [Australian] Government, based on the best Antarctic waters), to the science, economics and legal available science and after genuine consultation with aspects of Australian MPA networks to different stakeholders” (Hunt & Colbeck, 2014). PARKS VOL 24.2 NOVEMBER 2018 | 20 PARKSJOURNAL.COM (a) 1997 (b) 2014 Figure 1. Australia’s Marine Protected Area estate in a) 1997 and b) 2014. External waters of Heard and McDonald Islands, Macquarie Island, Norfolk Island, Christmas Island and Cocos (Keeling) Islands not shown. Note changes
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Eco-Narrative of Perth Canyon Marine Park South-West Marine Region
    An eco-narrative of Perth Canyon Marine Park South-west marine region Cover image: 3D view of Perth Canyon looking east Executive Summary Perth Canyon Marine Park encompasses a diversity of benthic environments, ranging from gently sloping soft sediment plains to near-vertical towering cliffs of exposed bedrock. This geodiversity extends from the head of Perth Canyon at the shelf break to the slope-confined submarine canyons that dissect the lower continental slope. Spanning almost 4.5 km of ocean depths, the Perth Canyon dominates the park and has a significant influence on the local ecosystem across the food chain. The size and location of the canyon is such that it promotes upwelling from the deep ocean, leading to plankton blooms that attract seasonal aggregations of larger pelagic fish, including whales. Over geological time, the canyon has evolved to provide extensive areas of benthic habitat suitable for deep-sea corals and sponges. The park is not without environmental pressures, however, with evidence that marine heat waves can affect the health of the ecosystem at upper trophic levels. The information in this eco-narrative forms an initial baseline characterisation of Perth Canyon Marine Park. Our knowledge of the park, and of the Perth Canyon in particular, is such that we can now better understand its ecosystem structure, which can be used to inform management and monitoring into the future. The key gap in our knowledge of the park is in the deepest areas, particularly for benthic communities on the lower continental slope to abyss. Targeted 1 oceanographic and biological surveys covering these deep-water locations and to understand links between the deepest areas and the Perth Canyon in particular would contribute to an improved overall understanding of the park ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Oceans and Coasts Tasmania Perspectives Sustainable Oceans and Coasts
    Sustainable Oceans and Coasts Tasmania Perspectives Sustainable oceans and coasts In 2020, the United Nation declared this coming coasts, as many sectors will need to work together decade as the ‘United Nations Decade for Ocean to achieve our goal: social services, tourism, industry, Science for Sustainability’. Their vision for the coming land use experts, ocean and coastal researchers, and decade is underpinned by participative and decision makers from all levels of government. This transformative values: Outcomes Paper reports on the deliberations of a broad cross section of sectors in Tasmania. “The Decade is embracing a participative and transformative process so that scientists, policy makers, managers, and service users can work The importance of a national strategy together to ensure that ocean science delivers Australian oceans and coasts are threatened by the greater benefits for both the ocean ecosystem fragmented way we manage and govern the and for society. ecological and social processes that connect them; This Decade will be designed to facilitate global we do not have a clear path forward to ensure that communication and mutual learning across these areas are healthy and resilient. The national research and stakeholder communities. It will strategy will outline clear, actionable pathways for work to meet the needs of scientists, policy achieving healthy and resilient oceans and coasts for makers, industry, civil society and the wider all of Australia, incorporating common themes from public, but it will also support new, collaborative the series of consultative workshops held by Future partnerships that can deliver more effective Earth Australia throughout 2020. science-based management of our ocean space and resources.”1 This initiative has been generously funded by the Lord Mayor’s Charitable Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Management and Conservation Topic 1: Oceans of the Future
    Queensland marine science syllabus guide Unit 4 Ocean issues and resource management Topic 1: Oceans of the future Management and conservation Topic 1: Oceans of the future a. Management and conservation T122 Habitat preservation arguments T123 MPA design criteria II T124 Marine ecosystem health T125 MPA success stories T126 Government and NGO management roles With the exception of the content supplied by third parties, logos and other materials protected by trademark, the content of this publication is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Licence. A summary of licence terms is available from creative commons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/3.0. The full licence terms are available from creative commons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/3.0/legalcode This publication should be cited as: Queensland Marine Science Syllabus Guide V1.2 Unit 4.1a Marine systems connections and change - Anthropogenic change © The Moffatt Group Australia 2019 Published by Wet Paper Publishers and Consultants PO Box 540 COOLANGATTA 4225 www.wetpaper.com.au [email protected] F50PP Marine systems ISBN: 978-1-86283-173-5 Page 3 Acknowledgements The publisher wishes to thank the following for their financial contributions to this publication. Editor Bob Moffatt Wet Paper Publications Acknowledgement of sourced data All sourced data appearing in this publication remains the intellectual property of, and is copyright to, the supplying agency. In consideration of the extent permitted by law, no agency gives any warranty in relation to the data (including accuracy, reliability, completeness or suitability) and accepts no liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for any loss, damage or costs (including indirect or consequential damage) relating to any use of the material or information contained in the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Marine Parks in the Indian Ocean Territories
    Australian Marine Parks in the Indian Ocean Territories Proposal for the establishment of marine parks in Australia’s Indian Ocean Territories (Christmas Island and Cocos (Keeling) Islands) SUMMARY AND MAPS - COCOS (KEELING) ISLANDS MARINE PARK DRAFT - JULY 2021 Australian Marine Parks North Network Coral Sea North-west Marine Park Network Norfolk Island Temperate East Network South-west Network South-east Network Macquairie Island parksaustralia.gov.au/marine Have your say Comments will be considered in preparing the Proposal for the establishment of marine parks This document is a summary of the consultation in Australia’s Indian Ocean Territories (Christmas draft of the Proposal for the establishment Island and Cocos (Keeling) Islands) for formal of marine parks in Australia’s Indian Ocean public consultation of at least 60 days, as Territories (IOT) (Christmas Island and Cocos required under the Environment Protection and (Keeling) Islands). In particular, it provides maps Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act. of the design (location, area and zoning) of the proposed Cocos (Keeling) Islands Marine Parks. Australian Marine Parks We welcome your comments on this summary, or on the draft proposal. A full version can be The Australian Government has established a found at https://parksaustralia.gov.au/marine/ network of 58 Australian Marine Parks in the pub/draft-iot-proposal-2021.pdf Commonwealth marine area, in addition to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and the Heard Email your comments to Island and McDonald Islands Marine Reserve. [email protected] Alternatively, comments can be mailed to: Marine parks protect seafloor environments like reefs; seagrass; seamounts; and canyons, and IOT Marine Parks Draft Proposal they can also support fishing and other marine Parks Australia activities such as tourism, and diving.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Marine Parks in the Indian Ocean Territories
    CREDIT: Rob Hughes CREDIT: Australian Marine Parks in the Indian Ocean Territories Proposal for the establishment of marine parks in Australia’s Indian Ocean Territories (Christmas Island and Cocos (Keeling) Islands) SUMMARY AND MAPS - CHRISTMAS ISLAND MARINE PARK DRAFT - JULY 2021 Australian Marine Parks North Network Coral Sea North-west Marine Park Network Norfolk Island Temperate East Network South-west Network South-east Network Macquairie Island parksaustralia.gov.au/marine Have your say Comments will be considered in preparing the Proposal for the establishment of marine parks This document is a summary of the consultation in Australia’s Indian Ocean Territories (Christmas draft of the Proposal for the establishment Island and Cocos (Keeling) Islands) for formal of marine parks in Australia’s Indian Ocean public consultation of at least 60 days, as Territories (IOT) (Christmas Island and Cocos required under the Environment Protection and (Keeling) Islands). In particular, it provides maps Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act. of the design (location, area and zoning) of the proposed Christmas Island Marine Park. Australian Marine Parks We welcome your comments on this summary, The Australian Government has established a or on the draft proposal. A full version can be network of 58 Australian Marine Parks in the found at https://parksaustralia.gov.au/marine/ Commonwealth marine area, in addition to the pub/draft-iot-proposal-2021.pdf Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and the Heard Email your comments to Island and McDonald Islands Marine Reserve. [email protected] Marine parks protect seafloor environments like Alternatively, comments can be mailed to: reefs; seagrass; seamounts; and canyons, and IOT Marine Parks Draft Proposal they can also support fishing and other marine Parks Australia activities such as tourism, and diving.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Fishing for Rock Lobster
    Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Rock lobster Recreational fishing guide 2020/21 A current licence is required to fish for any species of rock lobster Please note: • Fishing is permitted year-round. • Pot rope requirements apply when fishing with a combined pot line and float rig length longer than 20 metres. • A maximum of 2 floats may be attached to your pot. • Female setose lobsters may be taken. • Rock lobster tails (shell on) may be kept at your principal place of residence. Published August 2020 Contents Fish for the future ........................................1 Recreational fishing rules ...........................2 Licences ...................................................... 2 Fishing season and times ............................ 2 Legal size limits for taking lobsters ............. 3 Western and tropical rock lobster ................ 4 Southern rock lobster .................................. 4 Statewide catch limits ................................. 4 Fishing for lobsters ...................................... 5 Pot specifications ......................................... 7 Rope coiling ............................................... 12 Sea lion exclusion devices (SLEDs) ......... 13 Plastic bait bands ...................................... 13 Totally protected lobsters ........................... 14 Identifying berried and tarspot lobsters ..... 15 Lobsters you keep......................................16 Marine conservation areas ........................17 Other rock lobster fishing closures ...........
    [Show full text]
  • West Australian Marine Parks
    Ashmore Reef West Australian Long Reef Marine Parks Argo-Rowley Terrace Rowley Shoals Montebellos Ningaloo 2 oceans 10 parks 12 locations Shark Bay 23 degrees of latitude 28 expeditions 150 pelagic taxa 2,850 midwater BRUVS 55,290 individual animals Perth Canyon Geographe Bay Recherche Archipelago Gracetown Bremer Canyon Ashmore Reef • Ashmore Reef Marine Park is a 583 km2 combination of both sanctuary (IUCN Ia) and recreational use (IUCN IV) zones located 630 kilometres north of Broome in the Australian External Territory of Ashmore and Cartier Islands. • These waters hold historical significance for traditional Indonesian fisherman, they retain access to resources in certain areas of the MPA. Our surveys • Two surveys were conducted in the dry seasons of 2017 and 2018. • 200 samples in waters up to 354 metres deep. • 809 individuals counted from 42 taxa representing 19 families. • Observations included a whale shark (Rhincodon typus) and an ocean sunfish (Mola mola). • The waters are dominated by predators and large prey. Key findings • The threatened silvertip shark (Carcharhinus albimarginatus) is more abundant here than any other location. • We saw a decrease in abundance on the second year of sampling, yet the average length of the animals observed almost doubled. predators large prey small prey Why Ashmore Reef matters • It is one of the 65 Australian Ramsar sites, which are locations of significant importance to seabirds, shorebirds, and other marine life they support. • This habitat seems to be an important site for vulnerable reef-associated species of shark such as the silvertip shark. • Ashmore Reef might act as a stopover on Whale shark (Rhincodon typus) the migration path of whale sharks.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding More About Marine Parks in South Australian Waters
    Understanding more about marine parks in South Australian waters An Educational Resource for Years 7 to 10 Department for Environment and Water Acknowledgements Understanding more This online curriculum-linked resource was produced by Angela from Angela about marine parks in Colliver Consulting Services. Contents South Australian waters Dr Shelley Paull from National Parks and Wildlife Service South Australia and Introduction 1 colleagues from Parks Australia assisted in the development of this resource. How to use this resource book 2 The curriculum-linked resource is A suggested learning methodology 3 designed to support teachers in schools Curriculum Connections 4 implement teaching and learning programs about marine parks in South Marine Parks 101 11 Australian waters. A suggested learning sequence 17 This work is licensed under a Creative Appendix 31 Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC 4.0) References 32 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Student Project Files 37 by-nc/4.0/ The Project File 38 Resource 1.1 Your Design Brief 39 Resource 1.2 Define 41 Under this licence you can share and Resource 1.2.1 Write a definition 42 adapt but must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the licence, Resource 1.2.2 Getting to know South Australia's marine parks 43 and indicate if changes were made. Resource 1.2.3 South Australia’s marine park zones 44 The material may not be used for commercial purposes. Resource 1.2.4 Our connections to places 45 The following statement must be used Resource 1.3 Discover 47 on any copy or adaptation of the Resource 1.3.1 Other people’s connections 49 material.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation Impact Statement
    1 CONTENTS 1. PROBLEM DEFINITION 3 1.1 Background to the problem 3 1.2 The problem 6 2 WHY GOVERNMENT ACTION IS NEEDED 7 3. POLICY OPTIONS FOR MANAGING AUSTRALIAN MARINE PARKS 8 3.1 Policy options 8 3.2 Comparison of policy options 12 4. BENEFITS AND COSTS OF THE POLICY OPTIONS 13 4.1 The four goals for establishing the marine parks 18 4.2 Social and economic outcomes (costs) 22 4.3 Compliance/regulatory costs 31 5. PROCESS USED TO DEVELOP MARINE PARKS POLICY OPTIONS 33 5.1 Option 1 33 5.2 Option 2 39 6 PREFERRED POLICY OPTION 40 7 IMPLEMENTATION AND REVIEW 41 7.1 Reviewing management arrangements 41 7.2 Involvement of stakeholders and partner agencies in the implementation and review of management plans 41 7.3 Next steps 42 APPENDIX A: DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROCESSES USED TO DEVELOP THE POLICY OPTIONS 45 Processes informing Option 1 45 Processes informing Option 2 48 APPENDIX B: EXAMPLES OF CONSERVATION FEATURES AND SOCIO- ECONOMIC VALUES IN AUSTRALIAN MARINE PARKS 50 APPENDIX C: STATISTICS FOR AUSTRALIAN MARINE PARKS AND NETWORKS UNDER OPTIONS 1 AND 2—AREA AND NUMBER OF CONSERVATION FEATURES INCLUDED IN ZONES THAT OFFER A HIGH LEVEL OF PROTECTION, COMMERCIAL FISHERY DISPLACEMENT AND ACCESS FOR RECREATIONAL FISHERS 65 2 1. PROBLEM DEFINITION 1.1 Background to the problem According to Australia’s 2016 State of the environment report, Australia’s marine environment is generally in good condition, but is subject to a wide range of pressures.1 Several pressures that, in the past, have had substantial impacts on the marine environment (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft North-West Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network Management Plan 2017, Director of National Parks, Canberra
    © Director of National Parks 2017 This document may be cited as: Director of National Parks 2017, Draft North-west Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network Management Plan 2017, Director of National Parks, Canberra. ISBN: This management plan is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Director of National Parks. Requests and enquires concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the: Manager North-west Marine Parks Network 203 Channel Highway Hobart TAS 7050 Photography credits Front cover Coral at Rowley Shoals (Michelle Glover) DRAFT North-west Commonwealth Marine Reserves Network Management Plan 2017 1 FOREWORD Australia is surrounded by magnificent oceans and a marine environment that is the envy of the world. Our oceans are distinctive and diverse, home to marine life found nowhere else. Our oceans support people’s livelihoods and the Australian lifestyle. They provide places for people to watch wildlife, dive and snorkel, go boating and fish. Importantly, they create jobs in industries like fishing and tourism, and are a source of food and energy. Establishing marine parks is recognised as one of the best ways to conserve and protect marine species and habitats. In 2012, the Australian Government established 40 new marine parks around the country (formally called Commonwealth marine reserves). This was a significant achievement, expanding the total coverage of Australia’s National Representative System of Marine Protected Areas to 3.3 million km2—some 36 per cent of our oceans. Individual marine parks have been carefully located to include representative examples of Australia’s marine habitats and features.
    [Show full text]
  • South Australia's Marine Parks
    South Australia’s Marine Parks Explore marine life like nowhere else on earth. Parks Australia South Australia’s Marine Parks In the waters off South Australia, State and Commonwealth marine parks work together to help safeguard important marine habitats and the incredible plants and animals they support. Encompassing more than half a million square kilometres of These marine parks protect a variety of habitats, from sandy coastal, oceanic and seafloor ecosystems, these 26 marine beaches and sheltered seagrass beds to mud habitats on the parks protect important areas along the length of our coastline abyssal plain, some 5000 m deep. These habitats are home and out to the edge of Australia’s exclusive economic zone, to many marine species, ranging from stony corals, deep-sea 200 nautical miles from shore. sponges and shellfish to iconic species like the Australian sea lion, leafy sea dragon, bottlenose dolphin, great white shark, little penguin and Australian pelican. The marine parks conserve places with strong cultural heritage associations, including those with special significance to Aboriginal people. Marine park zoning Our marine environment is a shared resource that benefits us all. Marine parks are a great way to conserve marine biodiversity and support sustainable use. Marine park zones play an important role in achieving that balance between conservation and recreational and commercial use. The marine parks around South Australia are zoned to allow different activities in different areas. These parks are managed by the State (coastal) and Commonwealth (offshore) governments. High level of protection (Sanctuary Zones and National Park Zones) Sanctuary Zones in State Marine Parks and National Park Zones in Australian Marine Parks provide very high levels of protection for habitats and the species that live there.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Connectivity in South Australia's Marine Parks Network
    The University of Adelaide Assessing connectivity in South Australia’s Marine Parks Network Report prepared for the Department of Environment Water and Natural Resources Dr Alice Jones, Prof. Michelle Waycott, Dr Simon Bryars, Alison Wright & Prof. Bronwyn Gillanders University of Adelaide & DEWNR 21st March 2018F SA Marine Parks Network – connectivity review Table of Contents 1. Executive summary ............................................................................................. 2 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 3 2.1. Connectivity ............................................................................................................. 3 2.2. The South Australian marine parks........................................................................... 5 2.3. Need ........................................................................................................................ 6 2.4. Objectives and scope ............................................................................................... 8 3. Review of current knowledge.............................................................................. 9 3.1. Overview ................................................................................................................. 9 3.2. Literature review ................................................................................................... 12 4. Summary, knowledge gaps and recommendations ..........................................
    [Show full text]