DOCSLIB.ORG

Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity • Catherine Meads Catherine • Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Edited by Catherine Meads Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Special Issue Editor Catherine Meads MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin Special Issue Editor Catherine Meads Anglia Ruskin University UK Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601) (available at: https: //www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/special issues/Health Sexual Orientation). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03928-368-2 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03928-369-9 (PDF) c 2020 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Special Issue Editor ...................................... vii Preface to ”Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity” ......... ix Nerilee Ceatha, Paula Mayock, Jim Campbell, Chris Noone and Kath Browne The Power of Recognition: A Qualitative Study of Social Connectedness and Wellbeing through LGBT Sporting, Creative and Social Groups in Ireland Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3636, doi:10.3390/ijerph16193636 . 1 Kelly Horn and James A. Swartz A Comparative Analysis of Lifetime Medical Conditions and Infectious Diseases by Sexual Identity, Attraction, and Concordance among Women: Results from a National U.S. Survey Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1399, doi:10.3390/ijerph16081399 . 19 Ge Huang, Mengsi Cai and Xin Lu Inferring Opinions and Behavioral Characteristics of Gay Men with Large Scale Multilingual Text from Blued Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3597, doi:10.3390/ijerph16193597 . 33 Ros Hunt, Christopher Bates, Susan Walker, Jeffrey Grierson, Sarah Redsell and Catherine Meads A Systematic Review of UK Educational and Training Materials Aimed at Health and Social Care Staff about Providing Appropriate Services for LGBT+ People Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4976, doi:10.3390/ijerph16244976 . 55 Dongdong Jiang, Yitan Hou, Xiangfan Chen, Rui Wang, Chang Fu, Baojing Li, Lei Jin, Thomas Lee and Xiaojun Liu Interpersonal Sensitivity and Loneliness among Chinese Gay Men: A Cross-Sectional Survey Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2039, doi:10.3390/ijerph16112039 . 69 Andr´as K¨olt˝o, Alina Cosma, Honor Young, Nathalie Moreau, Daryna Pavlova, Riki Tesler, Einar B. Thorsteinsson, Alessio Vieno, Elizabeth M. Saewyc and Saoirse Nic Gabhainn Romantic Attraction and Substance Use in 15-Year-Old Adolescents from Eight European Countries Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3063, doi:10.3390/ijerph16173063 . 83 Ute Lampalzer, Pia Behrendt, Arne Dekker, Peer Briken and Timo O. Nieder The Needs of LGBTI People Regarding Health Care Structures, Prevention Measures and Diagnostic and Treatment Procedures: A Qualitative Study in a German Metropolis Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3547, doi:10.3390/ijerph16193547 . 105 I-Hsuan Lin, Nai-Ying Ko, Yu-Te Huang, Mu-Hong Chen, Wei-Hsin Lu and Cheng-Fang Yen Effect of Same-Sex Marriage Referendums on the Suicidal Ideation Rate among Nonheterosexual People in Taiwan Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3456, doi:10.3390/ijerph16183456 . 129 Isabel Llavero-Molino, Mar´ıa Teresa S´anchez-Oc´on, Mar´ıa Angeles´ P´erez-Morente, Beatriz Espadafor-L´opez, Adelina Mart´ın-Salvador, Encarnaci´on Mart´ınez-Garc´ıa and C´esar Hueso-Montoro Sexually Transmitted Infections and Associated Factors in Homosexuals and Bisexuals in Granada (Spain) during the Period 2000–2015 Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2958, doi:10.3390/ijerph16162958 . 141 v Catherine Meads, Ros Hunt, Adam Martin and Justin Varney A Systematic Review of Sexual Minority Women’s Experiences of Health Care in the UK Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3032, doi:10.3390/ijerph16173032 . 153 Jessica Salkind, Faye Gishen, Ginger Drage, Jayne Kavanagh and Henry W. W. Potts LGBT+ Health Teaching within the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2305, doi:10.3390/ijerph16132305 . 177 Chien-Chuan Wang, Ray C. Hsiao and Cheng-Fang Yen Victimization of Traditional and Cyber Bullying During Childhood and Their Correlates Among Adult Gay and Bisexual Men in Taiwan: A Retrospective Study Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4634, doi:10.3390/ijerph16234634 . 187 Hsing-Chen Yang Education First: Promoting LGBT+ Friendly Healthcare with a Competency-Based Course and Game-Based Teaching Reprinted from: Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 107, doi:10.3390/ijerph17010107 . 201 vi About the Special Issue Editor Catherine Meads is a Professor of Health at Anglia Ruskin University and senior systematic reviewer. She has been conducting research into lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) health since 1992 and has published a number of papers on this topic. Recently she completed a best-evidence review for Public Health England on healthcare experiences and health of UK sexual minority women. She has also delivered numerous public lectures, taught undergraduate medical students, helped develop an e-learning package for GPs and has been on several LGBT conference steering committees. She is currently a member of the UK Government Equalities Office LGBT Advisory Panel. vii Preface to ”Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity” Improving the health of particular populations is an important objective for public health service planners, policymakers and care delivery staff. This is especially important for disadvantaged minority groups such as people of minority sexual orientation and gender identity populations, where robust evidence to show considerable health inequities is developing. Improving health and wellbeing is an important objective for all who aspire to reduce health inequities (inequalities that are considered preventable). It is important to understand various factors that contribute to lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and similar (LGBT+) groups’ mental and physical health and the mediators and moderators of these relationships. This Special Issue was open to any subject area related to sexual orientation, gender identity, and physical or mental health and wellbeing, and considered systematic reviews as well as primary qualitative or quantitative research. The result is an interesting collection of published papers from around the world. They showed how health inequities in LGBT+ groups of people were found across a wide variety of political environments and health and wellbeing topics. Several focussed on healthcare delivery and its inadequacies regarding the treatment and care of LGBT+ people. The increasing interest in health and wellbeing research for minority sexual orientation and gender identity populations, which have been neglected in the past, shows its growing importance. It is hoped that this collection will contribute to the growing body of evidence around LGBT+ health and wellbeing that can be used by service planners, policymakers and the general public. Catherine Meads Special Issue Editor ix International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article The Power of Recognition: A Qualitative Study of Social Connectedness and Wellbeing through LGBT Sporting, Creative and Social Groups in Ireland Nerilee Ceatha 1,* , Paula Mayock 2, Jim Campbell 1, Chris Noone 3 and Kath Browne 4 1 School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; [email protected] 2 School of Social Work and Social Policy, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland; [email protected] 3 School of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; [email protected] 4 School of Geography, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 7 August 2019; Accepted: 24 September 2019; Published: 27 September 2019 Abstract: The broad research consensus suggesting substantial vulnerabilities among lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) communities may fail to recognize the protective factors available to these populations. The sparse literature on mental health promotion highlights the importance of understanding strengths-based community approaches that promote LGBT wellbeing.
Recommended publications
  • Retest & Interviewer Assessment in TEDS

    Retest & Interviewer Assessment in TEDS

    Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research - ISSN 2288-6168 (Online) 67 Vol. 8 No.2 May 2020: 67-104 http://dx.doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2020.8.2.67 Does Fake News Matter to Election Outcomes? The Case Study of Taiwan’s 2018 Local Elections Tai-Li Wang 1 National Taiwan University, Graduate Institute of Journalism, Taiwan Abstract Fake news and disinformation provoked heated arguments during Taiwan’s 2018 local election. Most significantly, concerns grew that Beijing was attempting to sway the island’s politics armed with a new “Russian-style influence campaign” weapon (Horton, 2018). To investigate the speculated effects of the “onslaught of misinformation,” an online survey with 1068 randomly selected voters was conducted immediately after the election. Findings confirmed that false news affected Taiwanese voters’ judgment of the news and their voting decisions. More than 50% of the voters cast their votes without knowing the correct campaign news. In particular, politically neutral voters, who were the least able to discern fake news, tended to vote for the China-friendly Kuomintang (KMT) candidates. Demographic analysis further revealed that female voters tended to be more likely to believe fake news during the election period compared to male voters. Younger or lower-income voters had the lowest levels of discernment of fake news. Further analyses and the implications of these findings for international societies are deliberated in the conclusion. Keywords: disinformation, fake news, China influence, election, voting behavior, political communication 1 Tai-Li Wang, National Taiwan University, Graduate Institute of Journalism, No. 1, Section 4, Roosevelt Rd, Da’an District, Taipei City, Taiwan 106 or by e-mail at [email protected].
  • Post-Enactment Report Marriage Act 2015 (No. 35 of 2015) (Dáil Éireann

    Post-Enactment Report Marriage Act 2015 (No. 35 of 2015) (Dáil Éireann

    Post-Enactment Report Marriage Act 2015 (No. 35 of 2015) (Dáil Éireann – Standing Order 164A) (Seanad Éireann – Standing Order 168) April 2019 Post Enactment Report Marriage Act 2015 (No. 35 of 2015) 1. Background to the Marriage Act 2015 A Constitutional Convention was established in 2012 to consider the question of whether an amendment should be made to the Constitution of Ireland to provide for marriage of same- sex couples. The Convention reported on that question in July 2013, and made 3 main recommendations: 1. That the Constitution be changed to allow for civil marriage for same-sex couples. 2. That an amendment be directive. 3. That further legislative change be made in the law on parentage, guardianship and upbringing of children. Almost 80% of the membership favoured changing the Constitution to allow for civil marriage for same-sex couples. The Government decided to hold a referendum on the question of allowing marriage to be contracted by two persons without distinction as to their sex. The Thirty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution (Marriage Equality) Bill 2015 proposed to insert the following section after section 3 of Article 41 of the Constitution: “4 Marriage may be contracted in accordance with law by two persons without distinction as to their sex.” The marriage equality referendum was held on 22 May 2015 and had a turnout of 61% of the electorate. The referendum was passed by 62% of voters which meant Ireland became the first sovereign state to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples by popular vote. Only one constituency returned a negative vote.
  • The Brief 2017

    The Brief 2017

    THe BRieF The Official Journal of the Irish Institute of Legal Executives 2017 Anniversary Edition In this issue . Plus . Legal Costs Update Companies (Accounting) Act 2017 Bullying in the Workplace Modern Family: Relationships & Law Economy and Other Challenges Judical Appointment in Ireland THe BRieF 2017 Contents Page Page Message from the President 3 Bullying in the Workplace 12 Former Clients & Former Employers 4 Caught on Camera 13 Commissioner for Oaths Appointments 6 Modern Family: Relationships & Law 14 Legal Executives Talk 6 Legal Executive of the Year Award 15 Legal Costs Update 7 Judicial Appointment in Ireland 16 Companies (Accounting) Act 2017 8 Economy & Other Challenges 19 Griffith College Cork Conferring 10 30 Year Celebratory Photographs 21 Griffith College Dublin Conferring 11 Kilmainham Courthouse 22 “The Irish Institute of Legal Executives - (IILEX) is featured among the sponsors of the annual AIB Private Banking Irish Law Awards”. Legal Disclaimer EDITORIAL TEAM The Brief adopts an independent and inquiring approach We the Editorial team hereby extend many thanks to all of those towards the law and the legal profession. It is published for the who contributed articles as well as photographs for this 30th benefit of members of the Irish Institute of Legal Executives Anniversary Edition of the Official Journal of IILEX – “The Brief”. and therefore aims to keep them properly informed of developments in the law and legal practice. Your contribution and interest in being involved is much appreciated and makes all of the difference towards the As part of this objective, The Brief will act as an authoritative production of a quality publication.
  • Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

    Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

    Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity • Catherine Meads Catherine • Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Edited by Catherine Meads Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Health and Wellbeing in Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Special Issue Editor Catherine Meads MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin Special Issue Editor Catherine Meads Anglia Ruskin University UK Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601) (available at: https: //www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph/special issues/Health Sexual Orientation). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03928-368-2 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03928-369-9 (PDF) c 2020 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND.
  • Classified List of Legislation – Acts

    Classified List of Legislation – Acts

    CLASSIFIED LIST OF ACTS IN FORCE IN IRELAND VERSION 13 September 2016 While every care has been taken in the preparation of this Classified List, the Law Reform Commission can assume no responsibility for and give no guarantees, undertakings or warranties concerning the accuracy, completeness or up to date nature of the information provided and does not accept any liability whatsoever arising from any errors or omissions. The Commission welcomes feedback and asks users to please notify any errors, omissions and comments by email to [email protected]. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose and origins of the Classified List of Acts-in-Force in Ireland ..................................................... 4 Tracking changes to Acts in the Legislation Directory ............................................................................ 6 Acts-as-amended (Revised Acts) ............................................................................................................. 6 Version history of the Classified List ....................................................................................................... 7 List of 36 subject-matter headings or titles in the Classified List ........................................................... 7 CLASSIFIED LIST OF LEGISLATION – ACTS ................................................................................................ 9 1. AGRICULTURE
  • MADE in HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED by BEIJING the U.S

    MADE in HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED by BEIJING the U.S

    MADE IN HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED BY BEIJING The U.S. Film Industry and Chinese Government Influence Made in Hollywood, Censored by Beijing: The U.S. Film Industry and Chinese Government Influence 1 MADE IN HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED BY BEIJING The U.S. Film Industry and Chinese Government Influence TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION 1 REPORT METHODOLOGY 5 PART I: HOW (AND WHY) BEIJING IS 6 ABLE TO INFLUENCE HOLLYWOOD PART II: THE WAY THIS INFLUENCE PLAYS OUT 20 PART III: ENTERING THE CHINESE MARKET 33 PART IV: LOOKING TOWARD SOLUTIONS 43 RECOMMENDATIONS 47 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 53 ENDNOTES 54 Made in Hollywood, Censored by Beijing: The U.S. Film Industry and Chinese Government Influence MADE IN HOLLYWOOD, CENSORED BY BEIJING EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ade in Hollywood, Censored by Beijing system is inconsistent with international norms of Mdescribes the ways in which the Chinese artistic freedom. government and its ruling Chinese Communist There are countless stories to be told about China, Party successfully influence Hollywood films, and those that are non-controversial from Beijing’s warns how this type of influence has increasingly perspective are no less valid. But there are also become normalized in Hollywood, and explains stories to be told about the ongoing crimes against the implications of this influence on freedom of humanity in Xinjiang, the ongoing struggle of Tibetans expression and on the types of stories that global to maintain their language and culture in the face of audiences are exposed to on the big screen. both societal changes and government policy, the Hollywood is one of the world’s most significant prodemocracy movement in Hong Kong, and honest, storytelling centers, a cinematic powerhouse whose everyday stories about how government policies movies are watched by millions across the globe.
  • Republic of Ireland

    Republic of Ireland

    Update - IRELAND REPUBLIC OF IRELAND Prof. Geoffrey Shannon February 2021 A. New Developments in the field of Divorce (since September 2002) Introduction Article 41.3.2 of the Irish 1937 Constitution provided that ‘no law shall be enacted providing for the granting of the dissolution of marriage’. Following a referendum on 24 November 1995 the Fifteenth Amendment to the Constitution Act 1995 was passed.1 As a result, Article 41.3.2 of the Constitution was replaced and the Family Law (Divorce) Act 1996 was introduced enabling the Irish courts to grant a decree of divorce. That said, it is often forgotten in the Irish context that from 1922 to 1937 there was no specific prohibition on the granting of divorce decrees in Ireland. Since the last national report, there have been very significant changes in Irish family law in general, and the divorce jurisdiction in particular. Same-sex marriage The Irish Constitution was assumed to contain an implicit prohibition on same-sex marriage. The Thirty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution (Marriage Equality) Act 2015 (previously Bill No. 5 of 2015) amended the Constitution of Ireland to permit marriage to be contracted by two persons without distinction as to their sex.2 It was approved by a referendum on 22 May 2015 by a margin of 62% of voters on a turnout of 61%. This was the first time that a state legalised same-sex marriage through a popular vote. At a practical level, same-sex marriage was introduced in Ireland in November 2015 by the Marriage Act 2015, which came into force on 16 November 2015.3 The first same-sex marriage ceremony was celebrated the next day in Clonmel, County Tipperary.
  • Obstacles to the Right of Free Movement and Residence for EU Citizens and Their Families: Country Report for Ireland

    Obstacles to the Right of Free Movement and Residence for EU Citizens and Their Families: Country Report for Ireland

    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS PETITIONS Obstacles to the right of free movement and residence for EU citizens and their families: Country report for Ireland STUDY Abstract This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizen’s Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the LIBE and PETI Committees, analyses the current status of transposition of selected provisions of Directive 2004/38/EC in Ireland and identifies the main persisting barriers to free movement for EU citizens and their family members in Irish national law and practice. The study also examines discriminatory restrictions to free movement, measures to counter abuse of rights and refusals of entry and residence rights, in addition to expulsions. PE 556 964 EN ABOUT THE PUBLICATION This research paper was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and Committee on Petitions and was commissioned, supervised and published by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Policy departments provide independent expertise, both in-house and externally, to support European Parliament committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU external and internal policies. To contact the Policy Department for Citizen's Rights and Constitutional Affairs or to subscribe to its newsletter, please write to: [email protected] Research Administrators Responsible Ottavio MARZOCCHI and Darren NEVILLE Policy Department C: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] AUTHOR Gillian KELLY, Legal Advisor, Milieu Ltd.
  • Download a PDF of Ivan's Resume Here

    Download a PDF of Ivan's Resume Here

    630 Ninth Avenue, Suite 702 New York, NY 10036 P: 212 924 6200 F: 212 924 6280 Ivan Quintanilla SAG-AFTRA, AEA IvanQuintanilla.com Height: 5ʼ9” Eyes: Brown Hair Color: Black TELEVISION ODD MOM OUT Co-Star BRAVO – Alex Reid, dir. ROYAL PAINS Co-Star USA – Michael Rauch, dir. THE BLACKLIST Co-Star NBC – Andrew McCarthy, dir. GOTHAM Co-Star FOX – T.J. Scott, dir. ALLEGIANCE Co-Star NBC – George Nolfi, dir. THE FOLLOWING Co-Star FOX – Joshua Butler, dir. BLUE BLOODS Co-Star CBS – David Barrett, dir. LAW & ORDER: CI Guest Star NBC – Darnell Martin, dir. LAW & ORDER Co-Star NBC – Constantine Makris, dir. BATTERY PARK (Pilot) Recurring Lions + Tigers – Mark Wilkinson, dir. RAPTURED (Web Series) Recurring Freeze Frame Entertain – Scott Ebersold, dir. FILM ARE YOU JOKING? Supporting Jake Wilson, dir. GIFT HORSE Lead Laura Moss, dir. QUARTET Lead Scott Ebersold, dir. THEATRE (SELECTED) THE LITTLE DOG LAUGHED Alex Signature Theatre (D.C.) – Michael Baron, dir. ELLIOT, A SOLDIER’S FUGUE Elliot Alliance Theatre – Kent Gash, dir ACTS OF MERCY Ricky Rattlestick Theater – Gia Forakis, dir. SONIA FLEW Zak/Jose Huntington Theatre – Nicholas Martin, dir. HIGHER UP Buster 59E59 – Pesha Rudnick, dir. DODO SOLASTALGIA Adán Red Fern Theater – Scott Ebersold, dir. SPINNING INTO BUTTER Patrick Chibas Stamford Theatre Works – Douglas Moser, dir. THE SILENT CONCERTO Naldo Fringe NYC – Scott Ebersold, dir. DEATHTRAP Clifford Anderson St. Michael’s Playhouse – C. Doherty, dir. TRAINING Southern Methodist University BFA in Theatre – Acting London Academy of Music and Dramatic Art Post-graduate Diploma On-Camera Heidi Marshall, Sally Johnson, Brad Calcaterra SPECIAL SKILLS Languages: Fluent Spanish; Accents: Latino, Nuyorican, Middle-Eastern Dance: Ballet, Jazz, Latin; Swimming (all strokes) .
  • U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress

    U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress

    U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress Shirley A. Kan Specialist in Asian Security Affairs October 27, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32496 U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress Summary This CRS Report, updated through the 113th Congress, discusses policy issues regarding military- to-military (mil-to-mil) contacts with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and records major contacts and crises since 1993. The United States suspended military contacts with China and imposed sanctions on arms sales in response to the Tiananmen Crackdown in 1989. In 1993, President Clinton reengaged with the top PRC leadership, including China’s military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Renewed military exchanges with the PLA have not regained the closeness reached in the 1980s, when U.S.-PRC strategic alignment against the Soviet Union included U.S. arms sales to China. Improvements and deteriorations in overall bilateral engagement have affected military contacts, which were close in 1997-1998 and 2000, but marred by the 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait crisis, mistaken NATO bombing of a PRC embassy in 1999, the EP-3 aircraft collision crisis in 2001, and the PLA’s aggressive maritime and air confrontations. Issues for Congress include whether the Administration complies with legislation overseeing dealings with the PLA and pursues contacts with the PLA that advance a prioritized set of U.S. security interests, especially the operational safety of U.S. military personnel. Oversight legislation includes the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for FY1990-FY1991 (P.L. 101-246) and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2000 (P.L.
  • Asia's China Strategy: Australia

    Asia's China Strategy: Australia

    10th Symposium on “China-Europe Relations and the Cross-Strait Relations” Shanghai, China July 28-31, 2013 A workshop jointly organised by German Institute for International and Security Affairs / Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Berlin and Shanghai Institutes for International Studies (SIIS), Shanghai, with the friendly support of the Robert Bosch Foundation, Stuttgart. Discussion Paper Do not cite or quote without author’s permission The Politics of the Nuclear Referendum Issue in Taiwan Dafydd Fell School of Oriental and African Studies Department of Politics and International Studies Ludwigkirchplatz 3–4 10719 Berlin Phone +49 30 880 07-0 Fax +49 30 880 07-100 www.swp-berlin.org The Politics of the Nuclear Referendum Issue in Taiwan Dafydd Fell In late February 2013 Taiwan’s ruling party, the Kuomintang (KMT 國民黨), announced its decision to support a nationwide referendum on whether to stop construction of the controversial Fourth Nuclear Power Station. The proposed referendum question will be “Do you agree that the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant should be halted and that it not should become operational?” This development came as a genuine surprise to many political observers. As Michael Turton points out, “For most observers the truly shocking aspect is that the government decided to allow a public referendum on an issue of this nature, when the outcome is unpredictable.”1 Although the date of the referendum has not yet been announced it is likely to be held in late 2013. The question of whether to complete construction of this power station has been the most salient environmental issue in Taiwan’s political scene for the last two decades.2 Regular demonstrations have been held against the construction of the plant since the late 1980s.
  • Understanding the 2018 Same-Sex Marriage Referendum in Taiwan

    Understanding the 2018 Same-Sex Marriage Referendum in Taiwan

    International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 10 • No. 10 • October 2020 doi:10.30845/ijhss.v10n10p8 Understanding the 2018 Same-Sex Marriage Referendum in Taiwan Chin Shen Ph.D. Candidate Graduate School of Core Ethics and Frontier Sciences Ritsumeikan University 56-1 Toji-in Kitamachi, Kita-ku, Kyoto Japan 603-8577 Abstract This paper analyzes Taiwan’s referendum on same-sex marriage and related possible disputes and problems. It discusses the shortcomings of the Referendum Act’s content. First, according to the results of the referendum, same-sex marriage in Taiwan is regulated by special regulations, but once the referendum’s content is examined, there remain questions and unclear points as to whether the present same-sex marriage law is consistent with the assurance of human rights and the promotion of social diversity. Second, there are still deficiencies and flaws that need to be reviewed and revised in the current Referendum Act. It is not clear whether the present law can promote communication and understanding between different groups in order to maintain society’s structural stability, equality and justice. This paper argues that we need to bring the opposite parties to communicate and seek mutual respect, to recognize and tolerate differences within society. This democratic process is the most important aspect of the spirit of referendum. Keywords: same-sex marriage; LGBT; sexual orientation; social changes; gender; referendum. 1. Same-sex Marriage Referendum On May 24th, 2017, the Justice announced the constitutional Interpretation No.748 “Declaration of Freedom of Same-Sex Marriage1”, pointing out that the Civil Code prohibition of same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, and required parliament to introduce legislation (or amendment) within two years after the release of the explanatory ruling to correct the situation.