Carlos Pinto de Abreu e Associados - Sociedade de Advogados RL (Responsabilidade Limitada) NIPC 509 828 990 - Registo na OA sob o número 23/2011 la bargaining legality the principle. on founded is that system Portuguese the in exist plea bargaining whether Portuguese analyze and the Procedure Criminal of stages different the bargaining L Procedure Criminal our in enshrined been have diversion of forms Indeed, some decades, date. of out h oeig f n investigation an of opening the “ first time in 1995 and more recently in September 2007, 2007, September in recently more 2010 and 2013. and 1995 in the for time reformed was first Code The February. 17 of 78/87, n.º legal strict to subject was case criminal a of opening that the the you that tell will she Portugal, in bargaining Procedure former. the of public on opening and bargain can prosecutor/ the bargaining: criminal criminal of proceedings commencement

1 Is there Is p there Do it the American Way: The Rise

the report of a always determines determines always crime a of report the óio e rcso ea, nce b D (a Decree) (Law DL by enacted Penal, Processo de Código aw. The question is: did they bring plea bring they did is: question The aw. Portuguese Legal System A presumption This If you ask a lawyer about plea plea about lawyer a ask you If Fr of Plea Bargaining, Leniency 2014 Fall Meeting ABA Section of International Law

m h vr frt einn of beginning first very the om Agreements & Criminal Settlement in Civil – October 23, 2:30 PM- The Portuguese The

concept

1 vaniacostaramos proceedings

la bargaining Plea

ity along? in its original version stated stated version original its in Alameda Quinta de Santo António, 13 Jurisdictions in t in bargaining lea

proceedings criteria. Even if a crime crime a if Even criteria.

Argentina exists in any form

– as such doesn’t such as

e u tk a ok at look a take us Let a nvrhls be nevertheless may

– – , there can be be can there ,

@carlospintodeabreu.com 1600

the inexistence of of inexistence the

Buenos Aires, legal Code of Criminal of Code ihn h last the within

4:00 PM - 675 Lisboa Portugal gis the against Law Law system system

n the and

. actually

”. The The ”. ? he –

a -

C

www.carlospintodeabreu.com F +351 213519 526 T 217 106+351 160 conviction, low interest in pursuing a a pursuing in certain crime, etc.). interest low conviction, achieving of probability low (i.e. grounds discretionary on investigation an opening refrai cannot still he reports, crime i/e cin i cle fr n interview an and formally declared for called is client his/her when moment the at case a of existence the of knowledge have only will he/she because academic, be This however, report. might, crime a to of nature try ill founded the reveal always will that can submit lawyer criminal a are non rules these a as that, of seen spite In usually existent. is role lawyer’s Public freedom the more ill to has Although relating now . report Prosecutor the to bargaining to is is client his/her of behalf on do can a lawyer All "No". is answer The stage? this at an of opening ill anonymous the in determines Code, this in “ 2007 facts. relevant the investigate and inquiry w prosecutor/police ill totally was report 3 coue n ae of cases in closure (3) of use suspension to provisional prosecutor diversion public the allows the four which are There lawyer? criminal the of role the bargaining is What plea Is ? stage stage investigative subject to the exceptions that are stated are that exceptions the to subject vestigation

trying reduce the suspicion against him. No No him. against suspicion the reduce t hs tg, h criminal the stage, this At Is there any room for for room any there Is reform Law Procedure Criminal The B ht bu drn te investigation the during about What – hne ti and this changed

la bargaining Plea to submit evidentiary elements elements evidentiary submit to ouin: 1 mdain (2) mediation; (1) solutions: hr te itm ut make must victim the where is allowed. is oe f rmnl Procedure Criminal of Code ”. These exceptions refer to to refer exceptions These ”. the report of a crime always always crime a of report the - - founded crime reports and and reports crime founded

founded and anonymous anonymous and founded , we dare say that that say dare we , recent ould have to open an open to have ould

-

founded, the public public the founded,

arguido

plea bargaining plea it situations exemption

proceedings uig the during d although nd o states now admissible? (suspect). (suspect). defense defens n from n

for of of 1 e - - ;

Carlos Pinto de Abreu e Associados - Sociedade de Advogados RL (Responsabilidade Limitada) NIPC 509 828 990 - Registo na OA sob o número 23/2011 also play an play also at n mediation in part six of length a months cannot be agreed. exceed or dignity, his offend that duties demand or liberty his from suspect the deprive which sanctions subject agreement, the may that states expressly penalty

3 2 the closure of the case without charges charges without case the of closure the reopened be cannot and closed be willcase duties,the treatment, etc.).compensation, the victim, by the of satisfaction (moral suspect duties certain with compliance to take an active role in criminal criminal in role active an criminal take future to in proceedings) mechanisms records this of criminal benefit not may defendant the no years be but whatsoever, will there of suspension prosecutor public information of to bill not a prosecutor public of Instead suspect. the accuse the allows h cmlit y h victim the by complaint the of withdrawal the to equivalent this is effect (the closed be will case the apply agreement, the lawyer. with to victim’s negotiating and prosecutor mechanism public (summary (summary proceedings will oevr hr i no is result. there Moreover its approve only will prosecutor public The victim. procedure and bargaining suspect between a procedure. is it bargaining However, a as described eito Regime Mediation

Articles 281 and 282 Code of . L aw aw no. 21/2007, of 12 June. The criminal The If the suspect complies with those those with complies suspect the If 2 Te prov The (2) (1) (1) be no criminal records whatsoever freely determine the terms of the the of terms the determine freely ; and (4) (4) and ; M ediation vaniacostaramos or speedy

Alameda Quinta de Santo António, 13

ac .

(t If the victim the If 3 tive role by requesting the the requesting by role tive e fet s qiaet to equivalent is effect he defense

proceedings is a a is isional suspension of of suspension isional 2

uig h nx five next the during

proc proceedings (art. 6, no. 1 and 2) 2) and 1 no. 6, (art. proceedings f t If

may proceedings to one exception: exception: one to plea @carlospintodeabreu.com so sumaríssimo esso 1600 gis hm the him, against ehns that mechanism lawyer lawyer hey

. The Criminal Criminal The . - has requested has 675 Lisboa Portugal rps the propose

– participants ujc to subject reach an an reach presenting .

may o there so,

could be be could h can She ).

take take ). –

-

C

www.carlospintodeabreu.com F +351 213519 526 T 217 106+351 160 eoe h bl o ifrain a been revealed hasbeen has ns filed information of bill paid the been before have all due and interest and corrected taxes properly been returns have tax the if penalty of exemption mechanism publi the allow that regulations specific several are no criminal records whatsoever. 5 June. rsctr o pl ti mechanism this apply public to the prosecutor requesting by role active an the case without charges charges without case the T the hinder the the to applied be may penalty of exemption ( f penalty of negotiating with t the to (“assistant” prosecution) her consent is necessary. proceedings 7 6 5 4 iia poiin o terrorist the in for found Code be Criminal can provision organizations similar aren’t any any and aren’t guilt compensation lower wrongdoing of are cases These defendant. the to sanction a applying without conviction of possibility these are members of criminal criminal of members gro are associations, or gathering if identify particular these in in , to other capture evidence authorities substantial the with cooperate who suspects those for penalty of exemption the allows trafficking drugs hc te rmnl Code Criminal those the which in happens accused. the This against charges from bringing refrain may prosecutor public the which in case particular a is Procedure) Regime Geral das Infracções Tributárias)

Article 299, no. 4, Criminal Code. Article 31, Law 15/93, of 22 Articles 22 and 44 General Regulation on Tax Infringments Código Penal. he effect is equivalent to the closure of closure the to equivalent is effect he pr fo te rmnl oe there Code, Criminal the from Apart h criminal The (3) Closure in cases of cases in Closure (3) hsl blower whistle

poeuo t ue f this of use to prosecutor c non-

s – (article 280 280 (article , in which there has been been has there which in , preventive

v.g.

application f damages of 7 defense p o organizations or ups he victim’s lawyer in ; : January. a Cie alw for allow Crimes Tax

h rpre the reported who

corruption cases cases corruption C ts that that ts argumen lawyer can play play can lawyer 5 ode of Criminal of ode

– 4 legislation on on ; legislation of the penalty. the of situations

foresees the the foresees

hr wl be will there –

exemption Law Law 17/2001, of n there and

. minor

6 and and

; a a ; for for

2

Carlos Pinto de Abreu e Associados - Sociedade de Advogados RL (Responsabilidade Limitada) NIPC 509 828 990 - Registo na OA sob o número 23/2011 the diversion mechanism. mechanism. diversion the the client on a possible cooperation cooperation possible a and/or on client the may lawyer could eventually be sustained. article 5), but it’s applicability 21, April of 20/2008, (Law case blower” “whistle the foresee not does sector private the in and commerce international only proceedings) speedy or (summary it before performing the correspondent correspondent action the performing before it withdraws/refuses and benefit undue an per the to or perpetration its of days 30 within crime

8 9 system in which a criminal sanction criminal a which in system be will sanction the approval, judicial after and, it accept may He defendant. the to sanction criminal a information a a without on imposed be The a ol b apid o rms punished crimes to applied be only may and proposes a different one. lawyer. judge thesanction requested the impose to refuses unless it, his change cannot he proposal, his or with information of files bill the prosecutor the once defendant Furthermore, the is proposal typicall prosecutorial the therefore and unusual rather is this Nevertheless the of application sanction. to unnecessary apply plcbe etne threshold closure sentence the be applicable Regarding must out. that pointed differences some have

Articles 392- Article 374- (4) (4) In all In (5) defens The hs four These enforced. These proceedings ma proceedings These enforced.

ulc prosecutor public situation 8

. if the public prosecutor finds it it finds prosecutor public the if nt eoitd rvosy with previously negotiated not y Similarities and differences ing request n ae o eepin of exemption of cases in

B Criminal Code. The Law on corruption in of 398 Code of Criminal Procedure. oa ad public and oral n vaniacostaramos P

oes sumaríssim rocesso these these Alameda Quinta de Santo António, 13 intervene intervene together with a proposal for for proposal a with together son that promises/accepts promises/accepts that son

lawyer e in the Portuguese Portuguese the in osblte o diversion of possibilities

situations rcso sumaríssimo processo impose for the application of of application the for on the basis of the Criminal and serves it serves and

criminal providing advice to advice providing @carlospintodeabreu.com 1600 files the bill of of bill the files may

-

675 Lisboa Portugal , the the , trial custodial a

trigger the the trigger

defendant maximum

hearing. defense penalty directly , the the , y only y is the the is o legal legal may

9 . -

C

www.carlospintodeabreu.com F +351 213519 526 T 217 106+351 160 xeto o the of exception the but trial. the over preside not may he judge continue, will proceedings the proposed as mechanisms diversion the of application the accept not does judge the diversion be of application mechanis the approve mediation, from apart the victim (although in different different in (although degrees victim the penalty admission as an Assistant (similar to the German German the to (similar Assistant the of an Nebenkläger suspension as provisory admission the required be only In will it procedure, required. always the possibility of accepting diversion diversion accepting of possibility the facing when investigation, the during that agreement and may oppose agreement and may n, u te ponmn is appointment automatic the but one, stage this at appointed lawyer a have always doesn’t suspect the the persons or against property against or persons the crimes) private in only latter the a information of submitting victim and complaint prosecution formal the on further depends and proceedings the which regarding semi or m years imprisonment. punishable gene in drugs trafficking, corruption, etc.) mentioned above the as (such enumerated months specifically six to up imprisonment of sentence a with 11 10 master Portuguese, detainees, etc. compulsory –

In the mediation procedure, the agreement of the victim is is victim the of agreement the procedure, mediation the In lhuh hr ae ae i wih h apitet is appointment the which in cases are there Although ediation may only take place in place take only may ediation except

Another authority, competent the Concerning rm dfeet perspective, different a From may mechanisms diversion other The Moreover oe b te ulc rsctr If prosecutor. public the by roved app –

–

10 and -

closure ms

ral be applied to crimes crimes to applied be ral haveparticulara characteristic: rvt crimes private x pol udr 1 frinr wo o not do who foreigners 21, under people ex: nor ) is also a part of the the of part a also is ) ih snec o u t five to up of sentence a with Privatkläger . Mediation agreements must must agreements Mediation .

these these , or in other cases cases other in or , motn aspe important

compulsory gis te defendant the against in cases of exemption of exemption of cases in rcso sumaríssimo processo diversion mechanisms diversion ).

omneet of commencement filing a private bill bill private a filing

if the victim requested her her requested victim the if . He may request request may He .

in statutory law law statutory in

a judge must must judge a 11

. This means means This . it. (i.e. crimes crimes (i.e.

.

t with ct: ae of cases

. against neither private 3 –

,

Carlos Pinto de Abreu e Associados - Sociedade de Advogados RL (Responsabilidade Limitada) NIPC 509 828 990 - Registo na OA sob o número 23/2011 of plea bargaining? complex crimes. complex a more resemble bargaining of could suspension proceedings provisional the even or penalty of exemption of cases in closure defendant in the investigative stage regime this under theory In resembles bargaining most that mechanism oe omn n ae o white of cases in common more and more becoming is This mechanisms. those of application the obtaining against statement a of providing defendant’s the “negotiate” and prosecutor the approach previous as of conviction value the have doesn’t register is only available to the courts courts the to and available only is register this but registered, be also will decisions judgment. final a to equivalent the decision in the criminal records, for employment employment for records, criminal the in purposes. decision the of transcript the order to not judge the request exceptionally ntne uig n interview an during instance for n,happe occasionally may it although negotiate may that prosecutor propose public the and criminal lawyer, his through suspect, il e rte o te defendant’s the records on written criminal be will in conviction the defense criminal lawyer. a of advice the enjoy always doesn’t suspect the mechanisms,

12 s ete al to able prosecutor neither is t Usually submissions. writing, real in no sanction. usually bargaining is criminal there certain Nonetheless a information accepts of bill the on facts the

lhuh vn n hs stain i i psil to possible is it situations these in even Although (6) (6) rm h patcl on o view, of point practical the From From the formal point of view view of point formal the From ial i ms b srse ta only that stressed be must it Finally to to r tee ehnss forms mechanisms these Are

rscto authorities prosecution

. vaniacostaramos

, nor to talk to him him to talk to nor , h trs f h agreement the of terms the – is rcs, s the as process, y en of means by

Alameda Quinta de Santo António, 13

the suspect pleads guilty pleads suspect the the the the the

rceig take proceedings rcso sumaríssimo processo rcso sumaríssim processo 12

he @carlospintodeabreu.com 1600

and al h public the call

defense formal formal - 675 Lisboa Portugal lawyer could could lawyer

in order to to order in is

The other The

oh the both

defense f the of written n it and lawyer lawyer - . hence collar

place

plea and and the the

to to o . , - C

www.carlospintodeabreu.com F +351 213519 526 T 217 106+351 160 and procedure), the of suspension provisional and mediation the of breach of cases a the (in obligations or agreement is there If closed. be facts admits he which suspect will the to guilt. th imply mechanisms(especiallyth probability that the suspect actually did commit the crime. elements, from which it may be concluded that there is a mechanisms is onl 13 lawyer of of lawyer rbeai because problematic formal could This required. usually a Nevertheless,admissionan of require of suspension proceedings provisional and penalty defendant to give a pre a give to defendant the advising risk to lawyer the for easier statements it previous make would This used. be never could his trial, silence during to right his on relied defendant 20 in occurred which system, legal our in change major lawyer a of presence the in and prosecutor a or judge investigation an of only may statements former his and silence to Court happens investigati the to leads This important given have may suspect disadvantage. investigation the during especially a be su former of bill a will continue. proceedings and filed be will mechanism, information diversion the apply to judge refuses the “negotiation” or after prosecutor the if Equally

We have to bear in mind that the application of these f vrtig os el te ae will case the well, goes everything If Closure Evidently . bl o ifrain il e filed be will information of bill a e used be even even Generally the defendant may rely on his right right his on rely may defendant the

application of these mechanisms mechanisms these of application has made made has t i cin i wlig o admit to willing is client his at pc ad o dfnat will defendant now and spect , as well as mediation do not not do mediation as well as , ny ae lc atr the after place take only

n ae o exempti of cases in y allowed if there are strong evidentiary an admission of guilt by the by guilt of admission an the the

if they were made in front front in made were they if

proceedings ngtain conducting negotiation a 3 Utl hn i the if then, Until 13. ng authority. Before the Before authority. ng aig omte the committed having plcto o these of application a

formal formal

negotiat - trial statement in in statement trial e first two) first e guilty stateme

will continuewill e en as seen be ion by the the by ion the facts facts the

. This is a is This n of on – plea nt in nt

will the the

13 is is 4 . .

Carlos Pinto de Abreu e Associados - Sociedade de Advogados RL (Responsabilidade Limitada) NIPC 509 828 990 - Registo na OA sob o número 23/2011 the court may take the confession in in confession the account as a mitigating circumstance take may court the play. compulsory is to comes crime case severe more a whenever the oral of and discussion contradictory The years. 5 to p crimes the basis of our legal regulations of of regulations legal our of basis the explicit an permission) without legal upon agreed be to started agreements” “sentencing (where system legal German the and experience t for law. existing the of basis the and advocated on office settlements such making of possibility judges prosecutions’ various public the legal criminal of in of branches some scholars, certain trials, settlements absence system. of legal total regulations our the in Despite exist not does penalty the confession on The negotiation). to subject not decide is (which will judge(s) the and place take will arguments closing the on court or open information in of bill the on trial “ such thing as formal “”. plea doesn’t defendant the system, system legal diversion mechanism. a the obtain to try to order

effect. facts the “pl the otherwise of explanation he an provide If hearing. also should he trial innocent, is he that states the of beginning to opportunity pleas las guilty pleads lal ifune b te German the by influenced Clearly stage trial a such as bargain plea A Firstly, C If the defendant defendant the If t Rather

stage through his lawyer. lawyer. his through before the Court the before –

hn eiig n h sentence, the on deciding When

unishable la bargaining Plea vaniacostaramos

? il ny ha only will some some e eedn i gvn the given is defendant he Alameda Quinta de Santo António, 13

”

ut e given be must give – , they propos they , ea” won’t have any real any have won’t ea”

rey n voluntarily, and freely ih mrsnet up imprisonment with clarifications

saeet t the at statement a ofse te facts the confesses

@carlospintodeabreu.com 1600 in the Portuguese Portuguese the in ve this effect on on effect this ve - pplication of a of pplication

675 Lisboa Portugal – T uig the during

ee s no is here ed that on on that ed .. f he if i.e.

. In our our In . rsn a present n the on .

he – -

C

www.carlospintodeabreu.com F +351 213519 526 T 217 106+351 160 r oa itgiy i nl ad void and null is integrity, moral or general a as physicalpersonalinfringementmatter,of or, coercion, torture, by Procedure 2 (1) 126 Crimina a of Code such the but by imposed, permitted not and illegal was promise be a would sanction that the concerning made agreement obtain an to defendants expectation the such in confession the of location; admissibility a prosecutors the of th of depend would the agreements law the before since equality the of and certainty principle legal for exigencies cnesos a trial at “confessions” eaiy (truth the legality principle, loyalty the violate clearly stip gemns without agreements legislator; the by enacted 14/533bc8aa516702b980257b4e003281f0?OpenDocument. 15 14 http://www.dgsi.pt/jstj.nsf/954f0ce6ad9dd8b980256b5f003fa8 the defendant would propose an an propose would settlement defendant and prosecutor the the hearing trial the of such an agreement had tohad be excluded such an agreement of promise a against agreements obtained confession void such and null outlawed therefore and illegal be to them declaring it and convictions violated been considered settlement the entered who defendants neig in entering rcie n etrd no these them. practice didn’t last long though. into accepted judges some and entered lawyers defendant’s the with settlements and practice defendant in front of the trial judge(s). confe the on of basis the possible made sentence, applicable

Art. 344 Code of Criminal Procedure. h grounds: The oe rsctr ahrd o this to adhered prosecutors Some n case One ltos f h poedns would proceedings the of ulations

states that states

to f h Cd o Criminal of Code the of – that his expectations had had expectations his that ocrig the concerning

reached the Supreme Court Court Supreme the reached uh n gemn hd to had agreement an such

-

n dtriig ht a that determining and ekn) rnil, the principle, seeking) –

n apae his appealed and hr o where nd courts of a certain a of courts nd

the possibility of of possibility the 14 Procedure l

“ so md b the by made ssion , at the beginning beginning the at , evidence obtained evidence previous

accepting such accepting e f the of ne

maximum

willing e article ;

legal legal This 15

”; s 5 . , Carlos Pinto de Abreu e Associados - Sociedade de Advogados RL (Responsabilidade Limitada) NIPC 509 828 990 - Registo na OA sob o número 23/2011 i git n t gt n xhne the exchange in get to and guilt his admit to him for better be might it client, functioning of our prosecutorial prosecutorial our of courts and institutions lawyer’s the functioning also but instinct evidence, the of assessment thorough very a requires atclry n cross in particularly Court, the before should the defendant Once trial? to going risk he should Or mechanisms? diversion of use the accept or request to client his advise he should him situation: complicated finds sometimes lawyer lawyer? the of role the influence this does How negotiation. that of bargaining, difficulties practical plea the including of form some to akin mechanisms diversion of application the nevnin f h lwe i neg in lawyer the of intervention lawyer criminal justice system, but simply simply that the but basis for legal system, a was there whether deciding institute justice bargaining criminal plea a positio a taking ectiva_2- short the to settlements, end practice bargaining” “sentence of an put kinds which to those in prosecutors enter forbidding Instruction issued Office Prosecutor’s General the an is be suppressed. this prohibition integrity; absolute moral personal article law by permitted “ by obtained 16 http://www.pgr.pt/grupo_bases/documentos_hierarquicos/Dir

If there is strong evide strong is there If T D In our system, the criminal criminal the system, our In possible the above described We Afterthis ruling of the SupremeCourt, h Cut nelnd ht t a not was it that underlined Court The h allowed for t – ase t tee questions these to answer e

2014.pdf

2 () e sae ta evidence that states (e) (2) 126 Some vaniacostaramos n eprec o the on experience and . Alameda Quinta de Santo António, 13

words on the role of theof role the onwords rms o a eei not benefit a of promise n on the benefits of such of benefits the on n

hose settlements. ” is offensive of the the of offensive is ”

and evidence must must evidence and confess . - @carlospintodeabreu.com 1600 odr cases border nce against the against nce - 675 Lisboa Portugal ? 16

self in a a in self

. defense otiating

- living living an an – – -

C

www.carlospintodeabreu.com F +351 213519 526 T 217 106+351 160 possibly diversion accept to clients advise to tendency a to lead can this Ultimately that sanction of degree the importantly, most and, conviction of a suit law good a these than better always is On settlement the trial. ap grounds facing be is defendant to sanction criminal the of type or length the include not does and granted 100% always not the a sentence or for lower consequence minor a sanction of certainty custodial unpredictable an possibly of risk trade to order to or a sanction) give custodial a or register not impossible not a In uniform. and coherent but everything in double jeopardy) also proceedings Portugal further preclude more i a it if obtain and jurisdiction settlement to able beneficial is client the multi a and have the case closed swiftly mechanism minor diversion the a of accept consequences to defendant the for prefe be could ittherefore and years in especially white Portugal, in proceedings weighty aspect in any legal system. u lgl system legal our rcdn sse ad u case our and system precedent difficult advice on crim no xmto o te penalty the of exemption case the of closure non ( a of assurance rcso sumaríssimo processo system In cross In A al te ak f ecig decision a reaching of task the Sadly - highly collar complex cases, may take take may cases, complex collar , - inal records...). records...). inal confess

ainl em assess team national ”

(cross get eas w d nt have not do we because mechanisms like this like

- border cases border ut e osdrd most considered be must ting is sometimes sometimes is

factor relevant

– - o i court in ion .

rnil that principle border

. Downside to to mle sentence) milder a , it is difficult is it assess the probability the assess

could be adequate to adequate be could

-

r coue with closure a or is also time time also is utda sanction custodial le we the when plied (to avoid criminal criminal avoid (to This is evidently aevidently is This e i i idem in bis ne ), h cin risks. client the

it is crucial that that crucial is it

the application application the a foreign a n means (which a

– (in order to to order (in

ae very made es etit is certainty concerning concerning conditional

.

– “ whether

a bad bad a though though law

rable rable , in in ,

or is is 6 – a

Carlos Pinto de Abreu e Associados - Sociedade de Advogados RL (Responsabilidade Limitada) NIPC 509 828 990 - Registo na OA sob o número 23/2011 proceedings in our legal system. criminal in advice giving when prudently

the contents of a possible agreement. agreement. possible a of contents the to contribute may lawyer defendant’s the n starting of view a with authorities prosecutorial approach to difficult it makes sometimes that system eedn cud rv ta sc an such that agreement even existed. prove could defendant any In the how picture to hard be would it event apply. would such rule doub isexclusionary it and as law our in regulated clearly not suppressed, are agreements his having statements trouble the have will changes), defendant prosecutor responsible there given, respect were statement the after if not case the be simply could (it “agreement” does this prosecutor the proceedings, reason some for If whatsoever. way any in recorded be of not will “agreement” provisional a suspension or penalty of exemption with closure a e.g. for trade in statement the with pros “agrees” lawyer the defendant’s if since been model, bargaining an insecure to leads have This mechanism. diversion they a apply to proposal formal a in converted until prosecutor therefore the upon binding not are and informally and the with prosecutoria law made possibly by “agreements” specifically not are regulated they possible, are four grounds: grounds: four on mainly States, United the in systems the e.g. as such model, bargaining plea wal to road long a based B opportunity. of principle more system a to discretionary legality strict of principle a seem does System? Legal Portuguese the E - - have we Do

ctr n aig i cin gvn a giving client his having on ecutor

eody we tee negotiations these when Secondly, isl, e ae vr formal very a have we Firstly, –

Towards vaniacostaramos

like we are moving away from from away moving are we like l authorities are made made are authorities l Alameda Quinta de Santo António, 13

la bargaining plea

i te ieto o a of direction the in k plea egotiations in which which in egotiations @carlospintodeabreu.com 1600 tful whether an an whether tful

agiig in bargaining ut there is still is there ut - 675 Lisboa Portugal

then n the on

It ?

the the - C

www.carlospintodeabreu.com F +351 213519 526 T 217 106+351 160 months and sometimes even years.

financial burden financial associated the and cases criminal collar increasing white - of er numb and the pending length complexity, as of well as quantity proceedings, rising the economic of crisis, pressure the that likely is it and present is foreign models bargaining of plea influence the But unlikely. is “ a towards criminal ordinary pre the to limited is in proceedings(save bargaining of penalty) are limited to minor offenses. w closure (save bargaining mechanismsthat resemble forma ofplea Advogada (Lawyer Vânia Costa Ramos in clients advising cross on influence have strategy defense and role lawyer’s the of rethinking a require will of application This stage. trial the the at sanctions criminal for settlements for allowing laws of enactment the probably and model bargaining plea flexible more 17 [email protected]

Trial hearings in high profile complex cases usually takes Whetherour system will walk the road - -

Fourthly, as we will explain beneath, explain will we as Fourthly, - border cases.

hrl, ot f h diversion the of most Thirdly, ue pe brann model bargaining plea pure”

17

will lead to a widerand a willtolead

processosumaríssimo –

-

trial stages. trial stages.

Portugal

, which will also also will which , ith exemption exemption ith )

7 )