DOCSLIB.ORG

Hearing Panel Interests Register Cindy Robinson – Chair

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hearing Panel Interests Register Cindy Robinson – Chair Draft Waimakariri Residential Red Zone Recovery Plan – Hearing Panel Interests Register Cindy Robinson – Chair Barrister and Independent Resource Management Commissioner (Chair endorsed) Past Partner at Duncan Cotterill Lawyers (2000-2009) I have provided two discrete legal opinions and facilitated a meeting for Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) in 2013. I have no ongoing instructions in relation to those or any other matters and they did not relate to the Waimakariri Residential Red Zone Recovery Plan. I have been nominated by CERA on occasion for appointment by Christchurch City Council as an Independent Hearings Commissioner as part of a joint panel (CERA, Ngāi Tahu and Christchurch City Council) to hear and decide resource consents in Christchurch Central City. Waimakariri District Council has in the past appointed me as an Independent Hearings Commissioner to hear and decide plan change applications in relation to Silverstream, Ruby Views, Clampett Investments Limited (a Kaiapoi business development) and currently in relation to the construction of Kaiapoi Arterial Road. I have also been appointed by Environment Canterbury on occasion as an Independent Hearings Commissioner and I have a current appointment to jointly hear and decide resource consent applications for Kaiapoi Arterial Road. I am currently instructed as Independent Legal Counsel by the Christchurch Replacement District Plan Independent Hearings Panel. I am not aware of any other individual or organisations that are known to me that are likely to make comments on the Draft Waimakariri Residential Red Zone Recovery Plan. In the event that I have any personal or business association with any person making written comments on the plan that become known to me during the hearing I will disclose those relationships at the hearing. Tim Vial Independent Resource Management Commissioner. Principal planner with Kāi Tahu ki Otago Ltd a Regional Environmental Consultancy that is owned by Te Rūnanga o Moeraki, Kāti Huirapa Rūnaka ki Puketeraki, Te Rūnanga o Ōtākou, and Hokonui Rūnanga. I whakapapa to the Ngāi Tahu hapū of Ngāi te Ruahikihiki and I affiliate to Te Rūnanga o Ōtākou. I was nominated by Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu and Te Ngāi Tūāhuriri Rūnanga for this Hearing Panel. I confirm that I have had no engagement with Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu and Te Ngāi Tūāhuriri Rūnanga on the Draft Waimakariri Residential Red Zone Recovery Plan. I have undertaken work for Te Rūnanga o Ngāi Tahu on the Natural Hazards and Residential Proposals of the Proposed Christchurch Replacement District Plan. I have no ongoing instructions in relation to this matter. I am not aware of any other individual or organisations that are known to me that are likely to make comments on the Draft Waimakariri Residential Red Zone Recovery Plan. In the event that I have any personal or business association with any person making written comments on the plan that become known to me during the hearing I will disclose those relationships at the hearing. Mayor David Ayers I have been Mayor of the Waimakariri District since the Local Government elections of October 2010. Since then I have been to countless Council, public and other meetings that have dealt with earthquake recovery matters both before and after the Red Zoning announcements of mid-2011. I was first elected to Rangiora Borough Council in 1983. In 1986 this Council amalgamated with the surrounding Rangiora District. This new body included The Pines and Kairaki in its area. From 1989 to 2001 and from 2007 to 2010, prior to being elected Mayor, I was a member of the Waimakariri District Council which included all of what was to become the Waimakariri Residential Red Zones in its area. I was a member of the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Commission from October 2010 to the formation of CERA. I chaired the Waimakariri District Council’s Earthquake Recovery Committee (which included the entire Council plus the chair of the Kaiapoi Community Board) throughout its life, 2010-2013. The Council has four standing committees (Audit, Resource Management and Regulation, Utilities and Roading, and Community Recreation. I am ex officio on all four and I do attend. I have attended most Kaiapoi Community Board meetings since October 2010 and, although not a member of the Board, I have probably spoken on a recovery matters a few times in post-meeting workshops. I was a member of the Recovery Strategy Advisory Committee (RSAC) of CERA throughout its life until it was subsumed into the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Implementation Committee (UDSIC) in 2015. Since then, UDSIC has continued to work on recovery matters. I was a member of the Government’s Advisory Board for the Transition (ABT) in 2014-2015. Both the RSAC and ABT provided advice to the Minister for Earthquake Recovery on recovery matters. I am a member of the Kaiapoi Riverbanks Steering Group which is dealing with earthquake recovery in areas adjacent to the Kaiapoi Residential Red Zones. I have chaired the Waimakariri Future Use of the Red Zones (FURZ) Steering Group from September 2014 to the present. Since appointment to the Hearing Panel, I have refrained from voting on substantive matters relating to the Preliminary Draft Waimakariri Residential Red Zone Recovery Plan or spoken at meetings in a way that could be seen as pushing an ultimate decision in any particular direction. This has mainly applied to FURZ and Council meetings. I know many of the submitters personally, some from before I became Mayor. I have no personal pecuniary interest in the outcome of the hearing. Councillor Neville Atkinson. I have been a Waimakariri District Councillor since the Local Government Elections of 2007. I have also served on the Kaiapoi Community Board as a member since 2004. I am currently employed by Kaiapoi Community Care & Employment Trust. Since becoming an elected member of local government I have been to countless Council, Community Board, public and other meetings that have dealt with earthquake recovery matters both before and after the Red Zoning announcements of mid-2011. The Council has four standing committees (Audit, Resource Management and Regulation, Utilities and Roading, and Community Recreation). I am a voting member of the Audit and Resource Management Committees, also holding the position of Chair of Audit Committee from May 2015 to October 2016. As a District Councillor I hold the Economic Development and Rangiora/Kaiapoi Town Centres portfolios. I was a member of the Waimakariri District Council’s Earthquake Recovery Committee (which included the entire Council plus the chair of the Kaiapoi Community Board) throughout its life, 2010- 2013. I have attended all but a few Kaiapoi Community Board meetings since becoming elected in 2004 and have spoken on earthquake recovery matters. I am a Waimakariri District Council appointed member of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Implementation Committee (UDSIC). UDSIC continue to work on recovery matters. I was a member of the Recovery Strategy Advisory Committee of CERA throughout its life until it was subsumed into the UDSIC. I am the Chair of the Kaiapoi Riverbanks Steering Group which is dealing with earthquake recovery in areas adjacent to the Kaiapoi Residential Red Zones. The work undertaken by this steering group does not cover any of the Kaiapoi Residential Red Zones. I am a member of the Waimakariri Future Use of the Red Zones (FURZ) Steering Group from September 2014 to the present. I am a Council appointed member of the Waimakariri District Council Hearings Committees, Chief Executive Review Committee, Code of Conduct Committee and District Licencing Committee. I am a Council appointed Trustee to the Te Kohaka O Tuhaitara Trust until 30 November 2016 and the Local Economic Development Advocacy Group. I am Kaiapoi Community Board appointed liaison person for the Northern Bulldogs Rugby League Club, Kaiapoi River Rehabilitation Working Party and the Christchurch International Airport Liaison Group. I am a former member of the Kaiapoi Coast Guard. Since my appointment to the Hearing Panel, I have refrained from voting on substantive matters relating to the Preliminary Draft Waimakariri Residential Red Zone Recovery Plan or spoken at meetings in a way that could be seen as pushing an ultimate decision in any particular direction. This has applied to my involvement with all of the above, but in particular FURZ, Council, Kaiapoi Community Board and Kaiapoi Riverbanks Steering Group meetings. I have no personal pecuniary interest in the outcome of the hearing. In the event that I have any personal or business association with any person making written comments on the plan that become known to me during the hearing I will disclose those relationships at the hearing. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seismic Ratings for Degrading Structural Systems
    205 GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE 22 FEBRUARY 2011 CHRISTCHURCH EARTHQUAKE Misko Cubrinovski1, Brendon Bradley1, Liam Wotherspoon2, Russell Green3, Jonathan Bray4, Clint Wood5, Michael Pender2, 6 7 8 1 John Allen , Aaron Bradshaw , Glenn Rix , Merrick Taylor , Kelly Robinson1, Duncan Henderson1, Simona Giorgini1, Kun Ma1, Anna Winkley1, Josh Zupan4, Thomas O’Rourke9, 10 11 Greg DePascale , Donnald Wells SUMMARY The 22 February 2011, Mw6.2-6.3 Christchurch earthquake is the most costly earthquake to affect New Zealand, causing 181 fatalities and severely damaging thousands of residential and commercial buildings, and most of the city lifelines and infrastructure. This manuscript presents an overview of observed geotechnical aspects of this earthquake as well as some of the completed and on-going research investigations. A unique aspect, which is particularly emphasized, is the severity and spatial extent of liquefaction occurring in native soils. Overall, both the spatial extent and severity of liquefaction in the city was greater than in the preceding 4th September 2010 Darfield earthquake, including numerous areas that liquefied in both events. Liquefaction and lateral spreading, variable over both large and short spatial scales, affected commercial structures in the Central Business District (CBD) in a variety of ways including: total and differential settlements and tilting; punching settlements of structures with shallow foundations; differential movements of components of complex structures; and interaction of adjacent structures via common foundation soils. Liquefaction was most severe in residential areas located to the east of the CBD as a result of stronger ground shaking due to the proximity to the causative fault, a high water table approximately 1m from the surface, and soils with composition and states of high susceptibility and potential for liquefaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Residential Red Zone: Summary of Technical Information As at Area ID: 15A, September 2016 15B
    Richmond residential red zone: Summary of Technical Information as at Area ID: 15A, September 2016 15B Purpose of this document: The following information provides a summary of the local environmental values, conditions and potential hazards. The information has been gathered using the best available technical data held by a number of agencies and organisations. It does not identify or assess land use options or the feasibility of land uses. The information in this document is not, and should not be interpreted as, a pre-determination, recommendation or decision about future use. No decisions regarding the future use of this land have been made. Overview of Richmond residential red zone (Area 15): Area 15 is approximately 27 hectares in area and adjoins River Road along the margins of the Ōtākaro/Avon River from Banks Avenue to the east and Fitzgerald Avenue to the west. To the north and west, Area 15 adjoins existing urban areas. This Area had a number of significant home gardens with mature trees some of which are still being tended. Area 15 is susceptible to a number of natural hazards, which can potentially occur either in isolation or collectively leading to a number of adverse cascading effects. The risk from many of these hazards will increase over time due to the accelerating effects of sea level rise. The area is particularly prone to lateral spreading. Land contamination may be an issue for much of the site. Location Map 1 Natural Environment and Cultural Setting and Features Natural Environment Adjacent to the Ōtākaro/Avon River and Tributaries Significant Ecological Site (site ID no.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 a CONSERVATION BLUEPRINT for CHRISTCHURCH Colin D
    3 A CONSERVATION BLUEPRINT FOR CHRISTCHURCH Colin D. Meurk1 and David A. Norton2 Introduction To be 'living in changing times* is nothing new. But each new technological revolution brings an increasingly frantic pace of change. There has been a growing separation of decision-makers from the environmental consequences of their actions; there is a general alienation of people from the land, and there has been a corresponding quantum leap in environmental and social impacts. The sad and simple truth is that the huge advances in power and sophistication of our technology have not been matched by an equivalent advance in understanding and wise use of its immense power. From a natural history perspective the colonies of the European empires suffered their most dramatic changes compressed into just a few short centuries. In New Zealand over the past millenium, the Polynesians certainly left their mark on the avifauna in addition to burning the drier forests and shrublands. But this hardly compares with the biological convuolsions of the last century or so as European technology transformed just about all arable, grazable, burnable and millable land into exotic or degraded communities, regardless of their suitability for the new uses. Even today, 2 000 ha of scrub is burnt annually in North Canterbury alone. It is equally tragic, since the lessons from past mistakes are all too obvious, that there has persisted an ongoing, but barely discernible, attrition of those natural areas that survived the initial onslaught. Inevitably the greatest pressures have occurred in and around the major urban centres. The European settlers were primarily concerned with survival, development, and attempts to tame the unfamiliar countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Canterbury Residential Red Zone Household Hazardous Waste Project
    Canterbury Residential Red Zone Household Hazardous Waste Project The Canterbury Residential Red Zone Household Hazardous Waste Project was developed to support earthquake recovery by enabling the collection and appropriate disposal of hazardous materials from red zoned residential properties prior to demolition. The key purpose was to minimise the associated risks to human health and the environment. The devastating effects of the Canterbury Earthquakes of September 2010 and February 2011 continue to shape the city around us as Christchurch recovers. We have seen the overwhelming task of rebuilding a city realised, with a new precinct based central city, changes to transport networks and the re-zoning of land to manage new risks of liquefaction. On a daily basis the changes to the urban landscape remind us of the significance of the events that literally shape the redevelopment of Christchurch. Decimating the central business district and the majority of historic and tall buildings across the city, the earthquakes also had significant effects in the east and north east residential suburbs. Huge swathes of these suburbs, where liquefaction created a number of issues including the immediate disruption of services and damage to infrastructure, were subsequently assessed and rezoned for demolition, due the property damage which had occurred and instability of land. Affected properties were acquired (compulsorily) by the Crown to ensure the removal of the hazard posed by residential development on instable ground, creating the Canterbury Residential Red Zone (RRZ). The dispersion of people as a result of the earthquake and the restricted access meant that many of these properties were left in an as is state, still containing an undisturbed cache of personal possessions and household items, including hazardous substances and materials which would need appropriate disposal.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Getting There Places to Fish Methods Regulations
    3 .Cam River 10. Okana River (Little River) The Cam supports reasonable populations of brown trout in The Okana River contains populations of brown trout and can the one to four pound size range. Access is available at the provide good fishing, especially in spring. Public access is available Tuahiwi end of Bramleys Road, from Youngs Road which leads off to the lower reaches of the Okana through the gate on the right Introduction Lineside Road between Kaiapoi and Rangiora and from the Lower hand side of the road opposite the Little River Hotel. Christchurch City and its surrounds are blessed with a wealth of Camside Road bridge on the north-western side of Kaiapoi. places to fish for trout and salmon. While these may not always have the same catch rates as high country waters, they offer a 11. Lake Forsyth quick and convenient break from the stress of city life. These 4. Styx River Lake Forsyth fishes best in spring, especially if the lake has recently waters are also popular with visitors to Christchurch who do not Another small stream which fishes best in spring and autumn, been opened to the sea. One of the best places is where the Akaroa have the time to fish further afield. especially at dusk. The best access sites are off Spencerville Road, Highway first comes close to the lake just after the Birdlings Flat Lower Styx Road and Kainga Road. turn-off. Getting There 5. Kaiapoi River 12. Kaituna River All of the places described in this brochure lie within a forty The Kaiapoi River experiences good runs of salmon and is one of The area just above the confluence with Lake Ellesmere offers the five minute drive of Christchurch City.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of September 4, 2010 Canterbury Earthquake
    Presentation of September 4, 2010 Canterbury Earthquake William Godwin, PG, CEG AEG Vice President, 2019-20 Webinar – May 6, 2020 Introduction ► This presentation is on the 2010 Mw 7.1 Canterbury Earthquake. The earthquake occurred as I was traveling from San Francisco to Auckland, New Zealand to attend the IAEG Congress. Upon arrival I was asked to join the Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance (GEER) team to document damage from the event in the Christchurch area of the South Island. Little did I know that another smaller (Mw 6.2), yet deadlier earthquake would strike 5 months later in close to the same area. Introduction ► The purpose of the GEER is to observe and record earthquake induced phenomena and impacts to infrastructure before evidence is removed or altered as part of cleanup efforts. ► The reconnaissance was conducted by a joint USA-NZ-Japan team with the main funding for the USA contingent coming from GEER and partial support from PEER and EERI. ► This presentation includes my photographs from Sept. 8-10 supplemented with a few photos and observations noted in the GEER report, Nov. 2010. I also describe other seismic events from 2011-16. Sept 4th Darfield Earthquake ► At 4:35 am on September 4th NZ Standard Time (16:35 Sept 3rd UTC) the rupture of a previously unrecognized strike-slip fault (Greendale Fault) beneath the Canterbury Plains of New Zealand’s South Island produced a Mw 7.1 earthquake that caused widespread damage throughout the region. Surprisingly only two people were seriously injured, with approximately 100 total injuries. This compares with 185 deaths in the 2011 event Canterbury Earthquake Sequence Greendale Fault Rupture Characteristics Epicenter (focal) depth: 10.8km Tectonic Setting Ground Motion (pga) Geographical Setting Preliminary Observations ► Rock Avalanche, Castle Rock Reserve, Littleton, Christchurch ► Fault Offset, Telegraph Rd at Grange Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kaiapoi River Has Historically Been Valued As a Freshwater Tidal Waterway and Port That Provided for Many Unique Values and Activities
    Assessment of the state of a tidal waterway - the Lower Kaiapoi River Report No. R18/7 ISBN 978-1-98-852079-7 (print) 978-1-98-852080-3 (web) Assessment of the state of a tidal waterway - the Lower Kaiapoi River Report No. R18/7 ISBN 978-1-98-852079-7 (print) 978-1-98-852080-3 (web) Adrian Meredith March 2018 Name Date Prepared by: Adrian Meredith March 2018 Principal Scientist Reviewed by: Helen Shaw, Surface Water June 2018 Science Manager Suzanne Gabites, Team Leader June 2018 Hydrological Science Approved by: Tim Davie July 2018 Chief Scientist Report No. R18/7 ISBN 978-1-98-852079-7 (print) 978-1-98-852080-3 (web) 200 Tuam Street PO Box 345 Christchurch 8140 Phone (03) 365 3828 Fax (03) 365 3194 75 Church Street PO Box 550 Timaru 7940 Phone (03) 687 7800 Fax (03) 687 7808 Website: www.ecan.govt.nz Customer Services Phone 0800 324 636 Assessment of the state of a tidal waterway - the Lower Kaiapoi River Executive summary The lower Kaiapoi River is a large river channel that traverses Kaiapoi township and drains to the large alpine fed braided Waimakariri River less than two kilometres from the sea. It is unique in being a previous channel of the Waimakariri River (the North Branch), receiving drainage from several major plains tributaries, and being strongly tidal over several kilometres of its length. It is a highly valued river, a culturally important waterway, a designated port and navigational waterway, and an important recreational and fishery resource. However, in recent years there have been complaints of degradation of its water quality and ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Assessment Report | October Waimakariri District Council
    Waimakariri District Council Independent assessment report | October * An independent assessment report issued by the Independent Assessment Board for the CouncilMARK™ local government excellence programme. For more information visit www.councilmark.co.nz 1 MBIE 2016 2 Stats NZ Census 2013 3 DIA 2013 4 Ministry of Transport 2013/14 *Period of assessment March 2017 Waimakariri District Council assessment report 1 Assessment Summary AT A GLANCE The Waimakariri district is expecting continued rapid growth yet retains its rural/small town character. The current situation Waimakariri District Council is a medium-sized, high-growth council emerging from the rebuild that has followed the Canterbury earthquakes. In addition, approximately 10,000 people have moved into the district since the earthquakes, with a further 8,000 forecast to move there over the next seven years. As a result, some substantial issues have emerged. Competition over resources and priorities for development has built up between Rangiora, Kaiapoi and Woodend. Period of assessment The assessment was conducted on 13 and 14 March 2017. Notwithstanding the significant capital investment which has occurred post-earthquakes, particularly in infrastructure, there continues to be strong demand for further investment in local facilities. Transport solutions are needed to ensure the district remains a viable commuter suburb, with 42 per cent of the workforce now commuting to Christchurch. 2 CouncilMARK™ $1,100m GROSS DOMESTIC 1 PRODUCT SERVES RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKES UP 1,546km 57,800 % ROADS4 2 0.841 PEOPLE , A MIX OF 3 91% EUROPEAN/PAKEHA OF NEW ZEALAND’S TOTAL LAND AREA 7% MĀORI REPRESENTING WAIMAKARIRI 2% ASIAN DISTRICT, FROM PEGASUS BAY THROUGH TO PUKETERAKI RANGE, AN AREA OF: 2 2,255 km POPULATION TREND HIGH GROWTH Key learnings The Council needs to be responsive to the pace and timing of change expected by its community relative to its own plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Red Zone Fact Sheet
    23 June 2011 Residential Red Zone Fact Sheet Geotechnical engineers Tonkin & Taylor have assessed and mapped residential land damage caused by the Canterbury earthquakes of 2010 and 2011. Some land in the Christchurch City and Waimakariri District areas has been so badly damaged by the earthquakes since 4 September 2010 it is unlikely it can be rebuilt on for a considerable period of time. Engineers have mapped these areas and categorised them as residential red zone. These properties are located in: • the east of Christchurch (along the Avon and in related areas usually associated with waterways or former waterways); • in the north-east of Christchurch (e.g. Brooklands); and • in the beach area of Waimakariri District (i.e. Kairaki Beach). There are currently about 5000 properties in the Christchurch City Council area and around 100 properties in the Waimakariri District Council area in the residential red zone. The criteria for defining areas as residential red zone are: • There is significant and extensive area wide land damage; • Most buildings are uneconomic to repair • There is a high risk of further damage to land and buildings from low- levels of shaking; and • The success of engineering solutions would be uncertain and uneconomic; and • Any repair would be disruptive and take a considerable period of time. In the residential red zone, area-wide land damage is so extensive there is an increased likelihood of further damage due to liquefaction and lateral spreading from the ongoing series of aftershocks. The 5.7 and 6.3 magnitude earthquakes on 13 June 2011 demonstrated this. Homeowners in the residential red zone face lengthy disruption that could go on for years.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln Planning Review December 2015
    Lincoln Planning Review December 2015. Volume 7. Issue 1-2 Coastal modelling of sea level rise for the Christchurch coastal environment Whose interests count? The Malvern Hills Protection Society and an irrigation scheme proposal A failed attempt at collaborative water planning Selwyn Waihora Variation 1 ISSN 1175-0987 Lincoln Planning Review, 7 (1-2) (2015) Table of Contents Lincoln Planning Review is the journal of the Lincoln University EDITORIAL ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 Planning Association (LUPA) Sarah Edwards, Acting Editor-in-Chief and is an online publication produced twice each year and PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES primarily edited by students Coastal modelling of sea level rise for the Christchurch coastal The vision is “to be the pre- eminent source of information environment ������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 3 Ashton EAVES, Crile DOSCHER on planning issues, research and education in and affecting the Central and upper South RESEARCH Island”. Whose interests count? The Malvern Hills Protection Society and an Contact LPR: irrigation scheme proposal ����������������������������������������������������������16 Editor Nicola SNOYINK LPR c/o NRE Building PO Box 85084 FIELD NOTES AND CASE STUDIES Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647 Canterbury A failed attempt at collaborative water planning: Selwyn Waihora New Zealand Variation 1��������������������������������������������������������������������������������23 Hamish G. RENNIE Email: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Christchurch Retail, Red Zones and the Rebuild
    Strategic Consultancy Retail Intelligence Rome wasn’t built in a day: Christchurch Retail, Red Zones and the Rebuild www.joneslanglasalle.co.nz 2 Executive Summary: The prohibition of redevelopment in large parts of Christchurch is significantly impacting the shape of the urban environment of the city. This is being executed through the identification of Red Zones. The majority of the residential Red Zones are located in; the east of Christchurch (along the Avon and in related areas usually associated with waterways or former waterways); in the north-east of Christchurch (e.g. Brooklands); and in the beach area of Waimakariri District (i.e. Kairaki Beach). There are currently about 5,000 properties in the Christchurch City Council area and around 100 properties in the Waimakariri District Council area in the residential red zone. Future trends suggest: A hollowing out of the area of Christchurch around the Avon River. A population drift to the North of Christchurch A population drift to the Southwest of Christchurch A significant uplift in populations of the small towns around Christchurch Growth in retail spending in these areas will create additional demand for close to 80,000 sqm of retail space. Just over 40,000 sqm of retail development is currently in the pipeline suggesting there remain opportunities to tap into this growing demand profile heading forward. We see the greatest opportunities in the Supermarket / Grocery space, DIY, Home Furnishings and Food and Beverage sectors. This development is however not without its challenges as stakeholders in Christchurch remain prickly to proposed intensification at the periphery at what they often see is at the expense of the CBD.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Canterbury CMS 2013 Vol II: Maps
    BU18 BV17 BV18 BV16 Donoghues BV17 BV18 BV16 BV17 M ik onu Fergusons i R iv Kakapotahi er Pukekura W a i ta h Waitaha a a R iv e r Lake Ianthe/Matahi W an g anui Rive r BV16 BV17 BV18 BW15 BW16 BW17 BW18 Saltwater Lagoon Herepo W ha ta ro a Ri aitangi ver W taon a R ive r Lake Rotokino Rotokino Ōkārito Lagoon Te Taho Ōkārito The Forks Lake Wahapo BW15 BW16 BW16 BW17 BW17 BW18 r e v i R to ri kā Ō Lake Mapourika Perth River Tatare HAKATERE W ai CONSERVATION h o R PARK i v e r C a l le r y BW15 R BW16 AORAKI TE KAHUI BW17 BW18 iv BX15 e BX16 MOUNT COOK KAUPEKA BX17 BX18 r NATIONAL PARK CONSERVATION PARK Map 6.6 Public conservation land inventory Conservation Management Strategy Canterbury 01 2 4 6 8 Map 6 of 24 Km Conservation unit data is current as of 21/12/2012 51 Public conservation land inventory Canterbury Map table 6.7 Conservation Conservation Unit Name Legal Status Conservation Legal Description Description Unit number Unit Area I35028 Adams Wilderness Area CAWL 7143.0 Wilderness Area - s.20 Conservation Act 1987 - J35001 Rangitata/Rakaia Head Waters Conservation Area CAST 53959.6 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 Priority ecosystem J35002 Rakaia Forest Conservation Area CAST 4891.6 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 Priority ecosystem J35007 Marginal Strip - Double Hill CAMSM 19.8 Moveable Marginal Strip - s.24(1) & (2) Conservation Act 1987 - J35009 Local Purpose Reserve Public Utility Lake Stream RALP 0.5 Local Purpose Reserve - s.23 Reserves Act 1977 - K34001 Central Southern Alps Wilberforce Conservation
    [Show full text]