American Journal of Emergency Medicine 35 (2017) 154–158

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

American Journal of Emergency Medicine

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ajem

Review Newly approved and antibiotics reserved for resistant ☆ ☆☆ ★ infections: Implications for emergency medicine , ,

Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi, PharmD, MD, MPH a,b,⁎, Ali Pourmand, MD, MPH c,d, Larissa May, MD, MS, MSPH e

a Department of Emergency Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC b Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC c Department of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University, Washington, DC d The George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC e Department of Emergency Medicine, UC Davis, Davis, CA

article info abstract

Article history: Millions of patients are evaluated every year in the emergency department (ED) for bacterial infections. Emer- Received 19 September 2016 gency physicians often diagnose and prescribe initial therapy for a variety of bacterial infections, rang- Received in revised form 13 October 2016 ing from simple urinary tract infections to severe sepsis. In life-threatening infections, inappropriate choice of Accepted 13 October 2016 initial antibiotic has been shown to increase morbidity and mortality. As such, initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy on the part of the emergency physician is critical. Increasing rates of antibiotic resistance, drug allergies, and antibiotic shortages further complicates the choice of antibiotics. Patients may have a history of prior resis- tant infections or culture data indicating that common first-line antibiotics used in the ED may be ineffective. In recent years, there have been several new antibiotic approvals as well as renewed interest in second and third line antibiotics because of the aforementioned concerns. In addition, several newly approved antibiotics have the advantage of being administered once weekly or even as a single infusion, which has the potential to decrease hospitalizations and healthcare costs. This article reviews newly approved antibiotics and antibiotics used to treat resistant infections with a focus on implications for emergency medicine. © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction later time. Occasionally, patients may present to the ED from healthcare facilities and/or with previous culture data indicating an infection with Every year, millions of patients present to the emergency depart- organisms that are resistant to first and second line antibiotics. ment (ED) with bacterial infections [1]. These infections can range in The overuse of antibiotics has had the unintended effect of contribut- etiology and severity from mild cystitis to life threatening septic ing to antibiotic resistance, which presents a major challenge in the cur- shock. Emergency physicians must recognize the signs and symptoms rent healthcare environment. The Centers for Disease Control and of bacterial infection and initiate appropriate antibiotic therapy in a Prevention estimates that over 2 million people annually are infected timely fashion in order to reduce morbidity and mortality. Kumar with bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics. Of these, approximately 23 et al. demonstrated that initiating appropriate antibiotic therapy within 000 will die from their infection [1]. Examples of clinically important re- an hour of presentation was the strongest predictor of mortality in sep- sistant organisms that may be encountered in the ED include extended sis patients [2]. They also showed that patients who were not given ap- spectrum beta-lactamase producing and -resistant Escherichia propriate antibiotics had a five-fold increase in mortality [2].IntheED coli, , -resistant enterococcus, setting, microbiology results including susceptibility information may -resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), and - not be immediately available, making it necessary to initiate broad- resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Patients with resistant infections spectrum antibiotics with the intention of narrowing the coverage at a have limited treatment options due to a relative paucity of new antibiotics in the drug development pipeline as well as drug shortages impacting ap- proved antibiotics [3]. In the past few years there have been only a hand- ful of new antibiotics approved. It is important for emergency physicians ☆ Funding Support: No funding was provided for this study. to be cognizant of newly approved antibiotics, as well as current recom- ☆☆ Financial Disclosures: The authors have no financial relationships relevant to this arti- mendations for the treatment of resistant organisms as they are at the cle to disclose. frontlines of initiating appropriate antibiotic treatment for bacterial infec- ★ fl fl Con ict of Interest: The authors have no con icts of interest to disclose. tions in both hospitalized patients and those discharged to the communi- ⁎ Corresponding author at: 110 Irving Street NW, Washington, DC 20010. Tel.: +1 202 877 7385; fax: +1 202 877 7633. ty. This review will discuss newly approved antibiotics and older E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Mazer-Amirshahi). antibiotics used to treat resistant infections.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.034 0735-6757/© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Downloaded for Emily Carpio ([email protected]) at Asociación de Servicios Médicos Costarricenses from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on November 01, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. M. Mazer-Amirshahi et al. / American Journal of Emergency Medicine 35 (2017) 154–158 155

2. a fifth generation , with expanded activity against P aeruginosa, including strains that are resistant to , carbapen- 2.1. Ceftaroline ems, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and [17]. Tazobac- tam is a β-lactamase inhibitor that expands the activity of ceftolozane to Ceftaroline is a fifth-generation cephalosporin that was approved by include β-lactamase producing organisms, including ESBL producing or- the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2010 for acute bacterial skin ganisms [18]. In addition to P aeruginosa, ceftolozane- is and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and community acquired bacte- active against E coli, K pneumoniae, Streptococcus, and ESBL producing rial (CABP) [4]. Fifth-generation cephalosporins differ from Enterobacteriaceae, and some anaerobes. Activity against Staphylococ- previous generations in that they have expanded Gram-positive cover- cus species and Cdifficile is limited [16]. age, particularly including MRSA, but retain broad-spectrum Gram- Ceftazidime- is dosed every 8 hours as an intravenous in- negative coverage [5]. Ceftaroline has activity against Saureus,including fusion. Dose reduction is recommended in patients with moderate to not only methicillin-resistant strains, but also vancomycin-intermediate severe renal impairment. Adverse effects include headache, gastrointes- and resistant S aureus [4]. In addition, it has coverage against several tinal disturbances, and pyrexia. Hypersensitivity reactions and Cdifficile strains of resistant Spneumoniaeand other clinically important Gram- colitis have rarely (b2%) been reported. There are limited data regarding positive organisms, such as S viridans, L monocytogenes, and E faecalis. the use of ceftolozane-tazobactam in the pediatric population [15,16]. Ceftaroline possesses broad Gram-negative coverage as well, including Enterobacter, M catarrhalis, and Hinfluenza. It also is active against 3. non-extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) Ecoliand K pneumoniae. Because other β-lactams generally lack activity against MRSA, 3.1. Ceftaroline may obviate the need for combination antimicrobial thera- py. Of note, ceftaroline is not active against P aeruginosa or anaerobic Dalbavancin was approved by the FDA in 2014 to treat ABSSSIs [19]. bacteria [6]. Lipoglycopeptides act in a similar manner to vancomycin, by inhibiting Ceftaroline is administered as an intravenous infusion over one hour. polymerization and cross-linkage in bacterial synthesis by The recommended adult dose is 600 mg every 12 hours; however, dose binding to the D-Ala-D-Ala chain [20]. These antibiotics adjustments should be made for patients with moderate to severe renal have a similar spectrum of activity to vancomycin, including Streptococ- impairment and for patients receiving hemodialysis. The recommended cus species, S aureus (methicillin-sensitive and resistant), and treatment duration ranges from 5–14 days [7]. Ceftaroline is generally vancomycin-susceptible E faecalis [20]. The advantage of newer well tolerated and the most common adverse effects reported were gas- lipoglycopeptides lies in their lipophilic side chains, prolonging their trointestinal disturbances and headache. There was a low incidence half-lives, requiring less frequent dosing [20,21]. Dalbavancin, originally (b2%) of hypersensitivity reactions and C difficile colitis [7].Cross- approved to be administered as two infusions 1 week apart, has now reactivity in patients with allergy is similar to that of other been approved as a single dose agent which may shorten or completely advanced-generation cephalosporins. Rarely, ceftaroline has been asso- avoid hospitalization and decrease healthcare costs in patients with ciated with Coomb's positive hemolytic anemia [8,9]. Recently, moderately severe infections for whom intravenous antibiotics are ceftaroline was FDA approved for pediatric patients as young as 2 being considered without any other indication for hospitalization [21]. months of age [7]. Dalbavancin administration is most commonly associated with gas- trointestinal distress and pruritus. Infusion reactions are often rate- 2.2. Ceftazidime-avibactam related and can be mitigated by slowing the infusion; however, hyper- sensitivity (b2%) reactions do occur [22]. It is unclear to what extent Approved by the FDA in 2015, ceftazidime-avibactam combines the dalbavancin and other new lipoglycopeptides cross-react with vanco- anti-pseudomonal third-generation cephalosporin ceftazidime with the mycin [22]. Rarely elevations in alanine aminotransferase and Cdifficile novel non-β lactam β-lactamase inhibitor avibactam. It is indicated for colitis (b2%) may occur [19,21,22]. complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) in combination with metronidazole and complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) [10].Be- 3.2. cause ceftazidime is a third-generation cephalosporin, it has activity pri- marily against Gram-negative organisms, with limited activity against In 2014 the FDA approved oritavancin as the first single dose product Gram-positive organisms and anerobes [11]. Avibactam has expanded to treat ABSSSIs [23]. In clinical trials, a single 1200 mg dose was non- β-lactamase inhibition compared to other molecules such as tazobac- inferior to a 7 to 10 day course of vancomycin for the treatment of tam or [12]. As such, the addition of avibactam expands ABSSSIs [24]. It has a similar spectrum of activity to dalbavancin and the activity of ceftazidime to include ESBL-producing bacteria, including vancomycin [12,24]. It has the advantage of being administered as a sin- E coli, P aeruginosa, K pneumoniae, and CRE [13,14]. gle dose which may shorten or avoid hospitalization [23,24].Itisadmin- Ceftazidime-avibactam is administered over a 2-hour infusion every istered as a 3-hour infusion, which does not require dose adjustment for 8 hours with dose reduction recommended for patients with moderate renal impairment. Oritavancin is generally well tolerated with nausea to severe renal insufficiency. Treatment duration ranges from 5–14 days and infusion site and hypersensitivity reactions (b1.5%) being the [10]. It is generally well tolerated with the most common adverse effects most common adverse effect [23]. Caution should be used in patients reported being headache, gastrointestinal disturbances, and infusion taking warfarin as concomitant administration may increase bleeding site reactions. Renal failure and elevation of liver transaminases have risk. Also, oritavancin is contraindicated in patients who are being been reported [11]. Hypersensitivity reactions and Cdifficile colitis are administered heparin as it may artificially prolong activated partial rare (1–5%). Of note, combinations of avibactam with other antibiotics thromboplastin time (aPTT) (as well as prothrombin time [PT]). Cdiffi- are currently in clinical trials. cile colitis has been rarely reported [23].

2.3. Ceftolozane-tazobactam 3.3.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam was approved for use in the United States in Telavancin was the first approved by the FDA in 2014 for the treatment of cIAIs in combination with metronidazole as 2009 and it is indicated for complicated bacterial skin and skin structure well as monotherapy for cUTIs [15]. It has also been used off-label for infections (cBSSSIs) and hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) [16]. Ceftolozane is VABP [25]. It has a similar spectrum of activity compared to vancomycin

Downloaded for Emily Carpio ([email protected]) at Asociación de Servicios Médicos Costarricenses from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on November 01, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 156 M. Mazer-Amirshahi et al. / American Journal of Emergency Medicine 35 (2017) 154–158 and the newer lipoglycopeptides, but a shorter duration of action, re- subunit, in a similar manner but with more affinity than tetracyclines. quiring once-daily dosing [25-27]. In addition, it has a less favorable ad- Tigecycline is active against a broad-spectrum of pathogens, including verse effect profile, limiting its role as a first or second-line agent. The Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, atypical bacteria, and an- most common adverse effects were gastrointestinal effects, a foamy ap- aerobes. It is active against several clinically important resistant bacte- pearance to urine, headache and infusion and hypersensitivity reactions ria, including MRSA, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and multi-drug [25-27]. Telavancin has a black box warning for developmental effects resistant Acinetobacter and K pneumoniae. It is not active against P and should be avoided during pregnancy. It has also been associated aeruginosa [36,37]. with renal failure and increased mortality in patients with renal insuffi- Tigecycline is administered as a 100 mg IV loading dose, followed by ciency. It also interferes with coagulation studies and may increase the 50 mg IV every 12 hours [35]. The dose should be reduced in patients QTc interval. As with other agents, there is also the risk of Cdifficile with severe hepatic impairment. There have been several important ad- colitis [25-27]. verse effects noted with tigecycline. Of note, it carries a black box warn- ing for increased mortality compared to other antibiotics [35,38]. The 4. Oxazolidinones reason for this increased mortality is not clear at this time. In addition, tigecycline has been associated with transaminitis and pancreatitis. Hy- 4.1. Tedizolid persensitivity reactions and Cdifficile colitis have been rarely (b2%) re- ported [35]. There are also concerns regarding fetal toxicity and tooth Tedizolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic approved by the FDA in 2014 discoloration and as such, should be avoided during pregnancy and its for the treatment of ABSSSIs. This class of antibiotic works by inhibiting use is not recommended under the age of 18 years [35-38]. bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50s ribosomal subunit [28]. Although similar in action to linezolid, minor structural modifications 5.3. Colistimethate (Colistin) confer activity to linezolid-resistant strains of S aureus. It is active against MRSA, Streptococci,andEnterococci species, including some Colistin is a antibiotic that was initially marketed in the VRE strains as well as selected Gram-positive anaerobes [29]. 1950s. Its use fell out of favor due to high rates of nephrotoxicity and Tedizolid is dosed at 200 mg once daily for 6 days. It has good oral neurotoxicity. However, in the setting of emerging resistance, its use is bioavailability and is available in tablets for transition to oral therapy. making a resurgence [39]. work by disrupting the bacterial It undergoes biliary excretion and dose adjustment is not required in cell membrane, leading to cell death [40]. Colisitin is primarily active the setting of renal or hepatic insufficiency [28,29]. Tedizolid is general- against Gram-negative organisms, and of particular clinical importance, ly well tolerated with the most common adverse events being headache multidrug resistant strains of E coli, P aeruginosa, K pneumoniae, and and gastrointestinal disturbances. Rarely (b2%), elevated alanine ami- Acinetobacter species. It is one of the last resort treatments for notransferase values, hypersensitivity reactions, and Cdifficile colitis carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriacae; unfortunately there are now have been reported. Importantly, the incidence of serious adverse colistin-resistant CREs as well [34]. It is also active against Gram- events associated with linezolid, such as peripheral and optic neuropa- positive organisms, anaerobes, and some fungi [40-42]. thy, as well as myelosuppression are less common with tedizolid Use of colistin should be guided by culture and sensitivity data for in- [29,30]. Like linezolid, tedizolid is a monoamine oxidase inhibitor but fections that are resistant to other available antibiotics in conjunction to a lesser extent, which has not been demonstrated to be of clinical sig- with infectious disease consultation. It is dosed intravenously 2 to 4 nificance at this time. As a precaution, it is recommended that seroto- times daily and the dose should be adjusted for renal insufficiency. It nergic agents be avoided or patients closely monitored while taking may also be used orally for bowel decontamination and via inhalation, tedizolid. Significant drug–drug interactions leading to serotonin syn- most commonly in cystic fibrosis patients [39,42]. Although recent drome have been reported with linezolid [31]. data suggests that colistin is less toxic than originally reported, it can cause nephrotoxicity (acute tubular necrosis), and neurotoxicity (weak- 5. Other antibiotics ness, ataxia, vertigo, parasthesias) that may be irreversible [39].Asum- mary of the dosage, indications, and toxicities of the aforementioned 5.1. antibiotics is presented in Table 1.

Daptomycin was approved by the FDA in 2003 for the treatment of 6. Implications for emergency medicine cBSSSIs and S aureus bacteremia, including right-sided endocarditis [32]. Of note, daptomycin is not recommended for the treatment of Emergency physicians are often the point of first contact for patients pneumonia because it because it binds to pulmonary surfactant [33]. presenting with resistant infections and are the providers that initiate Its mechanism of action is unique in that it causes rapid depolarization antibiotic therapy, which is often continued upon hospital admission of the bacterial cell membrane, leading to disruption of cellular process- [43]. This usually happens before consultation with an infectious disease es and ultimately death. Daptomycin acts primarily on Gram-positive specialist can occur. Patients can present with resistant infections that organisms, particularly S aureus, including MRSA, Streptococcus,and may not respond to the usual broad spectrum antibiotics initiated in Enterococci [32,34]. the ED and this can have an adverse effect on patient outcomes. As Daptomycin is administered intravenously once daily over 2 minutes. such, emergency physicians should have a basic understanding of new Higher doses are recommended for bacteremia. Dose adjustment is rec- antimicrobial agents as well as older second and third line agents. ommended for patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency and They should also be able to identify patients at risk for resistant infec- daptomycin has been noted to be less effective in this patient population. tions, such as those with a prior hospitalization in the past 90 days (par- Several adverse effects have been associated with daptomycin adminis- ticularly in the intensive care unit), nursing home residents, patients on tration, including hypersensitivity reactions, eosinophilic pneumonia, hemodialysis, and those recently treated with antibiotics [44-47] rhabdomyolysis, peripheral neuropathy, and Cdifficile colitis [32,34]. (Table 2). These agents will likely be utilized in patients who have previous 5.2. Tigecycline culture data available from either a healthcare facility or prior hospital- ization, those who are allergic to first-line agents, or in situations where Tigecycline was first approved by the FDA in 2005 and is indicated preferred antibiotics are impacted by drug shortages and may be un- for cBSSSIs, cIAIs, and CABP [35]. It is a glycylcycline that works by available. Another reason to optimize first-line therapy is the cost of inhibiting bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the bacterial 30s newly approved agents, which are considerably more expensive than

Downloaded for Emily Carpio ([email protected]) at Asociación de Servicios Médicos Costarricenses from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on November 01, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. M. Mazer-Amirshahi et al. / American Journal of Emergency Medicine 35 (2017) 154–158 157

Table 1 Recently approved antibiotics and antibiotics for resistant infections

Medication Therapeutic category Indications Adult dose Toxicity (trade name)

GI disturbance Ceftaroline ABSSSI 600 mg IV q 12 h Cephalosporin hemolytic anemia (Teflaro) CABP renal adjustment hypersensitivity GI disturbance Ceftazidime-Avibactam cIAI 2.5 g IV q 8 h hypersensitivity Cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor (Avycaz) cUTI renal adjustment renal failure transaminitis headache cIAI Ceftolozane-Tazobactam 1.5 g IV q 8 h hypersensitivity Cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor cUTI (Zerbaxa) renal adjustment GI disturbance VABP pyrexia 1 g IV day 1, GI disturbance Dalbavancin (Dalvance) Lipoglycopeptide ABSSSI 500 mg IV day 8 infusion reactions renal adjustment transaminitis ↑ aPTT/PT Oritavancin (Orbactiv) Lipoglycopeptide ABSSSI 1200 mg IV × 1 GI disturbance infusion reactions ↑ aPTT/PT ↑QTc cBSSSI Telavancin fetal toxicity Lipoglycopeptide HABP 10 mg/kg IV q 24 (Vibativ) GI disturbance VABP infusion reactions renal toxicity GI distress Tedizolid (Sivextro) Oxazolidinone ABSSSI 200 mg IV/PO daily headache transaminitis GI distress Colistin 2.5-5 mg/kg per day IV in 2-4 doses Polymyxin Resistant Gram-negative infections neurotoxicity (Coly-mycin M) renal adjustment renal toxicity 4 mg/kg IV q 24 for cBSSSI eosinophilic pneumonia Daptomycin Lipopeptide cBSSSI 6 mg/kg IV q 24 peripheral neuropathy (Cubicin) for bacteremia rhabdomyolysis renal adjustment CABP 100 mg IV × 1 fetal toxicity ↑mortality Tigecycline Glycylcycline cBSSSI 50 mg IV q 12 h pancreatitis (Tygacil) cIAI hepatic adjustment transaminitis

HABP, hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia. older antibiotics, that are often available in generic formulations [48]. the spread of resistant organisms. ASPs involve a multidisciplinary Emergency providers should review available culture and sensitivity team that reviews antibiotic use and advises physicians on how to use data when available, as well as institutional antibiograms when choos- antibiotics more effectively. While not typically implemented in the ing an antibiotic regimen and consult an infectious disease specialist. ED setting, ASPs have been shown to be very effective in optimizing an- Early consultation with an infectious disease specialist is also important tibiotic use and their expansion to the ED setting could help improve an- because many of the aforementioned antibiotics likely require approval tibiotic selection and patient outcomes. Studies have demonstrated that for use. In addition, an increasing number of EDs employ department- institutional implementation of ASPs has led to a decrease in patients based pharmacists who can assist with antibiotic selection, dosing, ad- being infected with both Cdifficile and other resistant organisms as ministration, and monitoring. In institutions without a dedicated ED well as decreased costs associated with antibiotic therapy [51,52]. pharmacist, inpatient pharmacy services can be consulted to assist. In addition to treating resistant organisms, some of the newer Pharmacist involvement as part of an interdisciplinary team for the lipoglycopeptides may have a role in decreasing hospitalizations. management of pneumonia and sepsis has demonstrated improved pa- Dalbavancin is dosed once a week for 2 doses and oritavancin requires tient outcomes [49,50]. a single IV infusion. This may enable the outpatient treatment of ABSSSIs Emergency physicians should be cautious in using these new and in patients that are stable with appropriate follow up. This could help second line antibiotics without discretion to avoid promoting further decrease ED and hospital crowding as well as decrease healthcare antibiotic resistance. One resource in addition to infectious disease con- costs, although the drug costs compared to older agents are higher sultation is the hospital's antibiotic stewardship program (ASP), which [48]. However, data regarding the safety and efficacy of this practice works to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics and to decrease are lacking and there may not be a mechanism for reimbursement of drug costs if administered in the ED. This remains an area of prospective study. Table 2 Risk factors for antibiotic-resistant bacteria. 7. Conclusion Diabetes mellitus Central venous catheter Liver disease Feeding tubes The growing problem of antibiotic resistance has multiple implica- Neoplastic disease Total parenteral nutrition End-stage renal disease Urinary tract catheterization tions for emergency medicine providers. The potential for negative pa- Cerebrovascular disease Urinary or fecal incontinence tient outcomes increases as antibiotic resistance becomes more Non-ambulatory status Long term oxygen therapy prevalent. It is critical that emergency physicians are cognizant of local Long term steroid therapy Nursing home patient resistance patterns as well as new and available effective therapies to Ongoing chemotherapy Active decubitus ulcer treat resistant organisms. This should be done in conjunction with

Downloaded for Emily Carpio ([email protected]) at Asociación de Servicios Médicos Costarricenses from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on November 01, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 158 M. Mazer-Amirshahi et al. / American Journal of Emergency Medicine 35 (2017) 154–158 infectious disease specialists and institutional antibiotic stewardship [24] Corey GR, Kabler H, Mehra P, SOLO I Investigators, et al. Single-dose oritavancin in the treatment of acute bacterial skin infections. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2180–90. programs to prevent the development of further resistance. In addition, [25] Vibativ (telavancin) prescribing information. https://www.vibativ.com/pdf/ some new agents offer the potential for the outpatient management of PrescribingInformation.pdf. [Accessed August 8, 2016]. skin and soft tissue infections. The optimal use of these agents remains [26] Liapikou A, Dimakou K, Toumbis M. Telvancin in the treatment of Staphylococcus au- reus hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: clinical evidence and an area of future prospective study. experience. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2016;10:368–78. [27] Stryjewski ME, Graham DR, Wilson SE, O’Riordan W, Young D, Lentnek A, et al. As- References sessment of telavancin in complicated skin and skin structure infections study. Telvancin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-struc- ture infections caused by gram-positive organism. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46:1683–93. [1] CDC. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States. Atlanta, GA: US Department [28] Sivextro (tedizolid) prescribing information. http://www.merck.com/product/usa/ of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2013. [http://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/ pi_circulars/s/sivextro/sivextro_pi.pdf. [Accessed August 9, 2016]. threat-report-2013; Accessed September 1, 2013]. [29] Zhanel GG, Love R, Adam H, Golden A, Zelenitsky S, Schweizer F, et al. Tedizolid: a [2] Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, Light B, Parillo JE, Sharma S, et al. Duration of hypo- novel oxazolidinone with potent activity against multidrug-resistant gram-positive tension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant pathogens. Drugs 2015;75:253–70. of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1589–96. [30] Das D, Tulkens PM, Mehra P, Fang E, Prokocimer P. Tedizolid phosphate for the man- [3] Quadri F, Mazer-Amirshahi M, Fox ER, Hawley KL, Pines JM, Zocchi MS, et al. Anti- agement of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: safety summary. Clin bacterial drug shortages from 2001 to 2013: implications for clinical practice. Clin Infect Dis 2014;58:S51–7. Infect Dis 2015;60:1737–42. [31] Flanagan S, Bartizal K, Minassian L, Fang E, Prokocimer P. In vitro, in vivo, and clinical [4] Laudano JB. Ceftaroline fosamil: a new broad-spectrum cephalosporin. J Antimicrob studies of tedizolid to assess the potential for peripheral or central monoamine ox- Chemother 2011;66(Suppl. 3):iii11–8. idase interactions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013;75:3060–6. [5] American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Cephalosporins. AHFS drug infor- [32] Cubicin (daptomycin) prescribing information. http://www.merck.com/product/ mation 2010. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; usa/pi_circulars/c/cubicin/cubicin_pi.pdf. [Accessed August 11, 2016]. 2010. p. 91–106. [33] Henken S, Bohling J, Martens-Lobenhoffer J, Paton JC, Ogunniyi AD, Briles DE, et al. [6] Frampton JE. Ceftaroline fosamil: a review of its use in the treatment of complicated Efficacy of profiles of daptomycin for the treatment of invasive and noninvasive pul- skin and soft tissue infections and community-acquired pneumonia. Drugs 2013;73: monary infections with Streptococcus Pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1067–94. 2010;54:707–17. [7] Teflaro (ceftaroline fosamil) prescribing information. http://www.allergan.com/as- [34] Gonzalez-Ruiz A, Seaton RA, Hamed K. Daptomycin: an evidence-based review of its sets/pdf/teflaro_pi. [Accessed July 21, 2016]. role in the treatment of gram-positive infections. Infect Drug Resist 2016;9:47–58. [8] Corey GR, Wilcox M, Talbot GH, Friedland HD, Baculik T, Witherell GW, et al. Inte- [35] Tygacil (tigecycline) prescribing information. http://labeling.pfizer.com/ grated analysis of CANVAS 1 and 2: phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double- showlabeling.aspx?id=491&pagename=tygacil_fly. [Accessed August 12, 2016]. blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ceftaroline versus vancomycin [36] Pankey GA. Tigecycline. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;56:470–80. plus in complicated skin and skin-structure infection. Clin Infect Dis [37] De Rosa FG, Corcione S, Di Perri G, Scaglione F. Re-defining tigecycline therapy. New 2010;51:641–50. Microbiol 2015;38:121–36. [9] File Jr TM, Low DE, Eckburg PB, Tablot GH, Friedland HD, Lee J, et al. Integrated anal- [38] Prasad P, Sun J, Daner RL, Natanson C. Excess deaths associated with tigecycline after ysis of FOCUS 1 and FOCUS 2: randomized, double-blinded, multicenter phase 3 tri- approval based on noninferiority trials. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:1699–709. als of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus in patients with [39] Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK. Colistin: the revival of polymyxins for the management of community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2010;51:1395–405. multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40: [10] Avycaz (ceftazidime-avibactam) prescribing information. http://www.allergan.com/ 1333–41. assets/pdf/avycaz_pi. [Accessed August 3, 2016]. [40] Newton BA. The properties and mode of action of the polymyxins. Bacteriol Rev [11] Falcone M, Paterson D. Spotlight on ceftazidime/avibactam: a new option for MDR 1956;20:14–27. gram-negative infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016;71(10):2713–22. [41] Marchaim D, Chopra T, Pogue JM, Perez F, Hujer AM, Rudin S, et al. Outbreak of co- [12] Ehmann DE, Jahic H, Ross PL, Gu RF, Hu J, Durand-Réville TF, et al. Kinetics of listin-resistant, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in metropolitan Detroit, avibactam inhibition against class a, C, and D β-lactamases. J Biol Chem 2013;288: Michigan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:593–9. 27960–71. [42] Garonzik SM, Li J, Thamlikitkul V, Paterson DL, Shoham S, Jacob J, et al. Population [13] Chalhoub H, Tunney M, Elborn JS, Vergison A, Dennis O, Plésiat P, et al. Avibactam of colistin methanesulfonate and formed colistin in critically-ill confers susceptibility to a large proportion of ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas patients from a multi-center study provide dosing suggestions for various categories Aeruginosa isolates recovered from cystic fibrosis patients. J Antimicrob Chemother of patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55:3284–94. 2015;70:1596–8. [43] Kiyatkin D, Bessman E, McKenzie R. Impact of antibiotic choices made in the emer- [14] Flamm RK, Farrell DJ, Sader HS, Jones RN. Ceftazidime/avibactam activity tested gency department on appropriateness of antibiotic treatment of urinary tract infec- against gram-negative bacteria isolated from bloodstream, pneumonia, intra-ab- tions in hospitalized patients. J Hosp Med 2016;11:181–4. dominal and urinary tract infections in US medical centers. J Antimicrob Chemother [44] Aloush V, Navon-Venezia S, Seigman-Igra Y, Cabili S, Carmeli Y. Multidrug-resistant 2014;69:1589–98. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: risk factors and clinical impact. Antimicrob Agents [15] Zerbaxa (ceftolozane-tazobactam) prescribing information. https://www.merck. Chemother 2006;50:43–8. com/product/usa/pi_circulars/z/zerbaxa/zerbaxa_pi.pdf. [Accessed August 5, 2016]. [45] Aliberti S, Di Pasquale M, Zanaboni AM, Cosentini R, Brambila AM, Seghezzi S, et al. [16] Zhanel GG, Chung P, Adam H, Zelenitsky S, Denisuik A, Schweizer F, et al. Stratifying risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens in hospitalized patients Ceftolozane/tazobactam: a novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination coming from the community with pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2012;54:470–8. with activity against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Drugs 2014;74: [46] Wang PH, Wang HC. Risk factors to predict drug-resistant pathogens in hemodialy- 31–51. sis-associated pneumonia. BMC Infect Dis 2016;16:377. [17] Takeda S, Nakai T, Wakai Y, Ikeda F, Hatano K. In vitro and in vivo activities of a new [47] Binkley S, Fishman NO, LaRosa LA, Marr AM, Nackamkin I, Wordell D, et al. Compar- cephalosporin, FR264205, against Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents ison of unit-specific and hospital-wide antibiograms: potential implications for se- Chemother 2007;51:826–30. lection of empirical antimicrobial therapy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27: [18] Bush K, Macalintal C, Rasmussen BA, Lee VJ, Yang Y. Kinetic interactions of tazobac- 682–7. tam with beta-lactamases from all major structural classes. Antimicrob Agents [48] Hahn AW, Jain R, Spach DH. New approaches to antibiotic use and review of recently Chemother 1993;37:851–8. approved antimicrobial agents. Med Clin North Am 2016;100:911–26. [19] Dalvance (dalbavancin) prescribing information. http://www.allergan.com/assets/ [49] Frates SR, Weant KA, Seamon JP, Shirakbari A, Baker SN. Emergency pharmacist im- pdf/dalvance:pi. [Accessed August 6, 2016]. pact on health care-associated pneumonia empiric therapy. J Pharm Pract 2013;26: [20] Zhanel GG, Calic D, Schweizer F, Zelenitsky S, Adam H, Lagacé-Wiens PR, et al. New 124–30. lipoglycopeptides: a comparative review of dalbavancin, oritavancin and telavancin. [50] Flynn JD, McConeghy KW, Flannery AH, Nestor M, Branson P, Hatton KW. Utilization Drugs 2010;70:859–86. of pharmacist responders as a component of a multidisciplinary sepsis bundle. Ann [21] Boucher HW, Wilcox M, Talbot GH, Puttagunta S, Das AF, Dunne MW. Once-weekly Pharmacother 2014;48:1145–51. dalbavancin versus daily conventional therapy for skin infection. N Engl J Med 2014; [51] Valiquette L, Cossette B, Garant MP, Diab H, Pepin J. Impact of a reduction in the use 370:2169–79. of high-risk antibiotics on the course of an epidemic of Clostridium difficile-associat- [22] Roberts KD, Sulaiman RM, Rybak MJ. Dalbavancin and ortiavancin: an innovative ed disease caused by the hypervirulent NAP1/027 strain. Clin Infect Dis 2007; approach to the treatment of gram-positive infections. Pharmacotherapy 2015;35: 45(Suppl. 2):S112–21. 935–48. [52] Fowler S, Webber A, Cooper BS, Phimister A, Price K, Carter Y, et al. Successful use of [23] Obactiv (ortiavancin) prescribing information. http://www.orbactiv.com/pdfs/ feedback to improve antibiotic prescribing and reduce Clostridium difficile infection: orbactiv-prescribing-information.pdf. [Accessed August 7, 2016]. a controlled interrupted time series. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007;59:990–5.

Downloaded for Emily Carpio ([email protected]) at Asociación de Servicios Médicos Costarricenses from ClinicalKey.com by Elsevier on November 01, 2017. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright ©2017. Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.