Java Security: Present and Near Future

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Java Security: Present and Near Future JAVA SECURITY: PRESENT AND NEAR FUTURE Li Gong ince the inception of Java,1,2 there has • Usability—To be ubiquitous and been strong and growing interest in accepted in the marketplace, the plat- JavaSoft SJava’s security as well as in new secu- form must be easy to use for building rity issues raised by this technology’s deploy- small- and large-scale systems and ment. These concerns have reached the applications. mainstream—the New York Times, the Wall • Simplicity—To inspire confidence in its Street Journal, and others have run stories correctness, the platform cannot be too on Java security. However, we must exam- complex to analyze (by code inspection ine Java’s trustworthiness comprehensively, or testing, for example) for critical prop- from a broad dependability perspective,3-6 erties. not simply from the journalistic view. • Adequacy—The platform must contain A simplistic statement such as “Java is [or is all essential features and building not] secure” doesn’t come close to capturing blocks for supporting higher-level trust- the complexity of the issues involved. To pass worthiness (security) requirements. judgment on whether Java is a trustworthy • Adaptability—The platform must language or platform, we must precisely evolve with ease, following demand specify requirements of the overall system— and market reality. in this case, computer systems and the glob- al Internet infrastructure. Only then can we Judged by these (perhaps biased) criteria, hope to demonstrate vigorously that the plat- Java scores very favorably compared with form architecture satisfies or contributes to other existing languages and programming the satisfaction of the overall requirements, systems. In particular, Java’s platform inde- and that the platform’s actual implementation pendence greatly reduces the complexity— satisfies the architecture’s design requirement. and thus the probability of design and Unfortunately, neither of these two cru- implementation errors—of dealing with het- cial steps is feasible for security today. The erogeneous environments. The “write once, shape and the characteristics of the nation- run everywhere” philosophy also helps al (or global) system infrastructure are evolv- improve availability. ing rapidly. Consequently, such widely used Moreover, the encouragement to write terms as “Internet security” cannot capture code exclusively in Java (Sun’s “100% pure the essence of the trustworthiness required Java” initiative) is highly desirable because it of such an infrastructure. (Admittedly, such forces all security controls to go through the terms were not very helpful in the past, Java Virtual Machine. This raises the chances either.) Moreover, though formal methods of putting the necessary protection mecha- have been used successfully to verify some nisms in place and getting them (almost) The global system hardware devices, they are not sufficiently right. Other popular platform systems, such advanced to address correctness issues of as MS-DOS/Windows, typically require infrastructure is large-scale software systems. native methods with direct access to raw Given this state of affairs, we must use an system resources and devices. This makes evolving rapidly. alternative (albeit less scientific and idealis- retrofitting nonbypassable protection mech- tic) set of criteria to examine platform trust- anisms with backward compatibility an Java’s security model worthiness. From an industrial point of almost insurmountable task.7,8 view, such criteria must include the follow- This article introduces Java’s existing secu- must keep pace. ing considerations: rity features and the way they contribute to 14 IEEE Micro 0272-1732/97/$10.00 © 1997 IEEE . its overall usability, simplicity, adequacy, and adaptability in Java Web the global computing arena. It also discusses JavaSoft’s plans JavaOS HotJava Server JECF JMAPI to make new features available as the technology evolves. Network Access file control Servlet Gate The sandbox security model system list admin. object The original security model that Java provides is known as clients GUI the sandbox, a very restricted environment in which to run untrusted code (applets) obtained from the open network. Login Authorization/ SSL/ Code SSL/ protocol delegation SKIP signing SKIP The essence of the sandbox model is that a computer entrusts local code with full access to vital system resources (such as JDK Protection Access Signature DES/3DES domain control certification the file system). It does not, however, trust downloaded RSA/D-H remote code, which can access only the limited resources Class loader/manager IDEA, etc. provided inside the sandbox. We have deployed the sandbox model through the Java Nonexportable encryption extension Development Toolkit (JDK, the current version as of May 1997 is 1.1.2), and applications built with JDK generally adopt it. JDK enforces overall security through a number of mech- Figure 1. Overall architecture. JECF: Java Electronic anisms. First, the language is designed to be type safe1 and Commerce Framework; JMAPI: Java Management API. easy to use. The hope is that the burden on programmers is such that they are less likely to make subtle mistakes than they would using other programming languages such as C to accommodate rapidly emerging technologies based on or C++. Java. It must function across a wide range of platforms. These Second, compilers and a bytecode verifier ensure that include JavaOS, which is a Java-based operating system that applications built with JDK execute only legitimate Java code. runs directly on naked hardware, as well as native host sys- Moreover, a class loader defines a local name space and tems such as Microsoft Windows and MacOS. ensures that an untrusted applet cannot interfere with the Figure 1 shows the relationships between various Java operation of other Java programs. components. Finally, the Java Virtual Machine mediates access to cru- It is natural that JDK should serve as the base platform for cial system resources, and a SecurityManager class checks delivering security technologies to Java-based solutions. and restricts untrusted code’s actions to the bare minimum. Future releases of JDK will deliver at least the following secu- The actual implementation of the Java language and the rity features: runtime system is likely to contain bugs, at least for some time, just as any large-scale software system would. This is • Basic language safety features (type safety, bytecode clearly manifested in the discovery of some well-known verifier, class loader); bugs, perhaps most prominently those found by the research • Essential cryptographic primitives (MD5, SHA-1, DSA, team at Princeton University.9 X.509, DES, triple-DES); • Fundamental system security features (protection Evolving the sandbox model domain, access control, authorization and delegation, As Java gains popularity among users and developers, security policy manager); and requests for various security features have been flowing in. • Necessary networking and Web-based security support Among these are support for enabling flexible and config- (user authentication protocols, code signing, secure urable security policies, support for cryptographic capabili- communication protocols such as SSL and SKIP). ties, security protocols for network-based authentication and secure communication, and easy-to-use administration tools. Products built on top of JDK may need additional securi- Starting with JDK 1.1, JavaSoft will provide general Java ty features. For example, the Java Web Server (previously users and developers with a series of security features meet- known as Jeeves) may provide an additional framework for ing customer requirements. securely administering servlets, while the HotJava browser Applet signing. A prominent new security feature in JDK may provide a browser-specific user interface for configur- 1.1 is built-in support for applet signing. Using this feature, ing security policies. applet writers can digitally sign applets using their signature This technical architecture is potentially limited by business keys. The person viewing the applet can use a known public considerations such as licensing and exportability. The stan- key to verify that the applet is correctly signed and then choose dard JDK will be fully exportable under US laws and thus to accept the applet as trusted. This will enable the trusted cannot include strong encryption technology. The Java applet to run as if it were local code. JDK 1.1 contains the nec- Cryptography Extensions will be the vehicle that makes essary tools for code signing, including support for digital sig- unexportable technology available to US domestic users. natures, message digest, and certificate manipulation. JavaSoft will publish the API specification and documenta- New architectural directions. The design of an overall tion and make them available in accordance with the appro- Java security architecture is constrained in a number of ways. priate laws and regulations. It must be backward compatible, but also flexible enough Not shown in Figure 1 is a policy and certification facility May/June 1997 15 . Security Applications Java security/cryptography APIs Per site policy Sun's Reference Native reference implementation code implementation by implementation in Java xyz.com Per user configuration and Certificate per installation configuration authority Figure 3. Cryptographic support allowing alternative providers. Figure 2. Policy configuration. tographic functions. As illustrated in Figure 3, an application that
Recommended publications
  • A Java Security Scanner for Eclipse
    Colby College Digital Commons @ Colby Honors Theses Student Research 2005 JeSS – a Java Security Scanner for Eclipse Russell Spitler Colby College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses Part of the Databases and Information Systems Commons, Other Computer Engineering Commons, Programming Languages and Compilers Commons, and the Systems Architecture Commons Colby College theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed or downloaded from this site for the purposes of research and scholarship. Reproduction or distribution for commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the author. Recommended Citation Spitler, Russell, "JeSS – a Java Security Scanner for Eclipse" (2005). Honors Theses. Paper 567. https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses/567 This Honors Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Digital Commons @ Colby. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Colby. JeSS – a Java Security Scanner for Eclipse Russell Spitler Senior Honors Thesis Spring 2005 Colby College Department of Computer Science Advisor: Dale Skrien Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Secure Coding and Java Security 2.1 – Secure Coding 3 2.2 – Java Security 7 Chapter 3 Java Security Holes 3.1 – Don’t depend on initialization 13 3.2 – Make everything final 14 3.3 – Make your code unserializable and undeserializable 16 3.4 – Make your class non-Cloneable 19 3.5 – Don’t rely on
    [Show full text]
  • Eu-19-Zhang-New-Exploit-Technique
    New Exploit Technique In Java Deserialization Attack • Yang Zhang • Yongtao Wang Keyi Li “在此键⼊引⽂。• ” • Kunzhe Chai –Johnny Appleseed New Exploit Technique In Java Deserialization Attack Back2Zero Team BCM Social Corp. BCM Social Group Who are we? Yang Zhang(Lucas) • Founder of Back2Zero Team & Leader of Security Research Department in BCM Social Corp. • Focus on Application Security, Cloud Security, Penetration Testing. • Spoke at various security conferences such as CanSecWest, POC, ZeroNights. Keyi Li(Kevin) • Master degree majoring in Cyber Security at Syracuse University. • Co-founder of Back2Zero team and core member of n0tr00t security team. • Internationally renowned security conference speaker. –Johnny Appleseed Who are we? Yongtao Wang • Co-founder of PegasusTeam and Leader of Red Team in BCM Social Corp. • Specializes in penetration testing and wireless security. • Blackhat, Codeblue, POC, Kcon, etc. Conference speaker. Kunzhe Chai(Anthony) • Founder of PegasusTeam and Chief Information Security Officer in BCM Social Corp. • Author of the well-known security tool MDK4. • Maker of China's first Wireless Security Defense Product Standard and he also is the world's first inventor of Fake Base Stations defense technology–Johnny Appleseed Agenda • Introduction to Java Deserialization • Well-Known Defense Solutions • Critical vulnerabilities in Java • URLConnection • JDBC • New exploit for Java Deserialization • Takeaways 2015: Chris Frohoff and Gabriel Lawrence presented their research into Java object deserialization vulnerabilities ultimately resulting in what can be readily described as the biggest wave of RCE bugs in Java history. Introduction to Java Deserialization Java Deserialization Serialization • The process of converting a Java object into stream of bytes. Databases Deserialization Serialization • A reverse process of creating a Java object from stream of bytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Apache Harmony Project Tim Ellison Geir Magnusson Jr
    The Apache Harmony Project Tim Ellison Geir Magnusson Jr. Apache Harmony Project http://harmony.apache.org TS-7820 2007 JavaOneSM Conference | Session TS-7820 | Goal of This Talk In the next 45 minutes you will... Learn about the motivations, current status, and future plans of the Apache Harmony project 2007 JavaOneSM Conference | Session TS-7820 | 2 Agenda Project History Development Model Modularity VM Interface How Are We Doing? Relevance in the Age of OpenJDK Summary 2007 JavaOneSM Conference | Session TS-7820 | 3 Agenda Project History Development Model Modularity VM Interface How Are We Doing? Relevance in the Age of OpenJDK Summary 2007 JavaOneSM Conference | Session TS-7820 | 4 Apache Harmony In the Beginning May 2005—founded in the Apache Incubator Primary Goals 1. Compatible, independent implementation of Java™ Platform, Standard Edition (Java SE platform) under the Apache License 2. Community-developed, modular architecture allowing sharing and independent innovation 3. Protect IP rights of ecosystem 2007 JavaOneSM Conference | Session TS-7820 | 5 Apache Harmony Early history: 2005 Broad community discussion • Technical issues • Legal and IP issues • Project governance issues Goal: Consolidation and Consensus 2007 JavaOneSM Conference | Session TS-7820 | 6 Early History Early history: 2005/2006 Initial Code Contributions • Three Virtual machines ● JCHEVM, BootVM, DRLVM • Class Libraries ● Core classes, VM interface, test cases ● Security, beans, regex, Swing, AWT ● RMI and math 2007 JavaOneSM Conference | Session TS-7820 |
    [Show full text]
  • Java Security, 2Nd Edition
    Table of Contents Preface..................................................................................................................................................................1 Who Should Read This Book?.................................................................................................................1 Versions Used in This Book....................................................................................................................2 Conventions Used in This Book..............................................................................................................2 Organization of This Book.......................................................................................................................3 What's New in This Edition.....................................................................................................................5 How to Contact Us...................................................................................................................................5 Acknowledgments....................................................................................................................................6 Feedback for the Author..........................................................................................................................6 Chapter 1. Java Application Security...............................................................................................................7 1.1 What Is Security?...............................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Java(8$ Andrew$Binstock,$Editor$In$Chief,$Dr.Dobbs$
    Java$Update$and$Roadmap$ November(2014( Tomas$Nilsson$ Senior$Principal$Product$Manager$ Java$SE$ Copyright$©$2014,$Oracle$and/or$its$affiliates.$All$rights$reserved.$$|$ Safe$Harbor$Statement$ The$following$is$intended$to$outline$our$general$product$direcNon.$It$is$intended$for$ informaNon$purposes$only,$and$may$not$be$incorporated$into$any$contract.$It$is$not$a$ commitment$to$deliver$any$material,$code,$or$funcNonality,$and$should$not$be$relied$upon$ in$making$purchasing$decisions.$The$development,$release,$and$Nming$of$any$features$or$ funcNonality$described$for$Oracle’s$products$remains$at$the$sole$discreNon$of$Oracle.$ Copyright$©$2014,$Oracle$and/or$its$affiliates.$All$rights$reserved.$$|$ Agenda$ 1( Oracle$and$Java$ 2( Java$SE$8$Overview$ 3( Java$SE$9$and$Beyond$ Copyright$©$2014,$Oracle$and/or$its$affiliates.$All$rights$reserved.$$|$ 1( Oracle$and$Java$ 2( Java$SE$8$Overview$ 3( Roadmap$ Copyright$©$2014,$Oracle$and/or$its$affiliates.$All$rights$reserved.$$|$ Oracle$and$Java$ • Oracle$has$used$Java$since$the$beginning$of$Nme$(eg$1990s)$ • Acquired$JAVA$(Sun$Microsystems)$in$2010,$including$Java$IP,$trademarks$ • Embraced$OpenJDK,$open$community,$open$JCP$ – Welcomed$IBM,$Apple,$SAP,$ARM,$AMD,$Intel,$Twi\er,$Goldman$Sachs,$Microso^$and$many$others$ – Made$OpenJDK$official$Java$SE$reference$implementaNon$ – Ongoing$move$towards$open$development,$governance,$transparency$ • JDK$development:$Oracle$and$community$ – Oracle$focus$on$modernizaNon,$security,$big$Ncket$R&D$and$commercial$value$to$Oracle$ – Community$contributes$based$on$interest$and$ability,$examples:$
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Flexibility of the Java Sandbox
    Evaluating the Flexibility of the Java Sandbox Zack Coker, Michael Maass, Tianyuan Ding, Claire Le Goues, and Joshua Sunshine Carnegie Mellon University {zfc,mmaass}@cs.cmu.edu, [email protected], {clegoues,sunshine}@cs.cmu.edu ABSTRACT should protect both the host application and machine from The ubiquitously-installed Java Runtime Environment (JRE) malicious behavior. In practice, these security mechanisms provides a complex, flexible set of mechanisms that support are problematically buggy such that Java malware is often the execution of untrusted code inside a secure sandbox. able to alter the sandbox's settings [4] to override security However, many recent exploits have successfully escaped the mechanisms. Such exploits take advantage of defects in either sandbox, allowing attackers to infect numerous Java hosts. the JRE itself or the application's sandbox configuration to We hypothesize that the Java security model affords devel- disable the security manager, the component of the sandbox opers more flexibility than they need or use in practice, and responsible for enforcing the security policy [5, 6, 7, 8]. thus its complexity compromises security without improving In this paper, we investigate this disconnect between theory practical functionality. We describe an empirical study of the and practice. We hypothesize that it results primarily from ways benign open-source Java applications use and interact unnecessary complexity and flexibility in the design and with the Java security manager. We found that developers engineering of Java's security mechanisms. For example, regularly misunderstand or misuse Java security mechanisms, applications are allowed to change the security manager at that benign programs do not use all of the vast flexibility runtime, whereas static-only configuration of the manager afforded by the Java security model, and that there are clear would be more secure.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.4.0 Release Notes
    Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.4 6.4.0 Release Notes For Use with Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 Last Updated: 2017-12-12 Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6.4 6.4.0 Release Notes For Use with Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6 Legal Notice Copyright © 2017 Red Hat, Inc.. This document is licensed by Red Hat under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. If you distribute this document, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat, Inc. and provide a link to the original. If the document is modified, all Red Hat trademarks must be removed. Red Hat, as the licensor of this document, waives the right to enforce, and agrees not to assert, Section 4d of CC-BY-SA to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. Red Hat, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the Shadowman logo, JBoss, OpenShift, Fedora, the Infinity logo, and RHCE are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux ® is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries. Java ® is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates. XFS ® is a trademark of Silicon Graphics International Corp. or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. MySQL ® is a registered trademark of MySQL AB in the United States, the European Union and other countries. Node.js ® is an official trademark of Joyent. Red Hat Software Collections is not formally related to or endorsed by the official Joyent Node.js open source or commercial project.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration-Guide.Pdf
    Java Platform, Standard Edition Oracle JDK Migration Guide Release 12 F13815-02 March 2019 Getting Started The purpose of this guide is to help you identify potential issues and give you suggestions on how to proceed as you migrate your existing Java application to the JDK 12 release. The guide also highlights the significant changes and enhancements done to the JDK 12 release. This guide contains the following sections: • Significant Changes in the JDK • Preparing For Migration • Migrating From JDK 8 to Later JDK Releases • Next Steps Significant Changes in the JDK Before migrating your application to the latest JDK release, you must understand what the updates and changes are between it and the previous JDK release. If you are migrating from JDK 8, you should also be familiar with the differences between JDK 8 and later releases that are described in Migrating From JDK 8 to Later JDK Releases. See the following sections to know some of the significant changes in latest JDK releases. Significant Changes in JDK 12 Release The following are some of the important additions and updates in Java SE 12 and JDK 12: • JVM Constants API is introduced to model nominal descriptions of key class-file and run-time artifacts, in particular constants that are loadable from the constant pool. See JVM Constant API. • The switch statement is extended so that it can be used either as a statement or an expression. This is a preview language feature. See JEP 325: Switch Expressions (Preview) and JEP 12: Preview Language and VM Features. 1 • Support for Unicode 11.0.
    [Show full text]
  • The Java® Virtual Machine Specification Java SE 11 Edition
    The Java® Virtual Machine Specification Java SE 11 Edition Tim Lindholm Frank Yellin Gilad Bracha Alex Buckley Daniel Smith 2018-08-21 Specification: JSR-384 Java SE 11 (18.9) ("Specification") Version: 11 Status: Final Release Specification Lead: Oracle America, Inc. ("Specification Lead") Release: September 2018 Copyright © 1997, 2018, Oracle America, Inc. All rights reserved. The Specification provided herein is provided to you only under the Limited License Grant included herein as Appendix A. Please see Appendix A, Limited License Grant. Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 A Bit of History 1 1.2 The Java Virtual Machine 2 1.3 Organization of the Specification 3 1.4 Notation 4 1.5 Feedback 4 2 The Structure of the Java Virtual Machine 5 2.1 The class File Format 5 2.2 Data Types 6 2.3 Primitive Types and Values 6 2.3.1 Integral Types and Values 7 2.3.2 Floating-Point Types, Value Sets, and Values 8 2.3.3 The returnAddress Type and Values 10 2.3.4 The boolean Type 10 2.4 Reference Types and Values 11 2.5 Run-Time Data Areas 11 2.5.1 The pc Register 12 2.5.2 Java Virtual Machine Stacks 12 2.5.3 Heap 13 2.5.4 Method Area 13 2.5.5 Run-Time Constant Pool 14 2.5.6 Native Method Stacks 14 2.6 Frames 15 2.6.1 Local Variables 16 2.6.2 Operand Stacks 17 2.6.3 Dynamic Linking 18 2.6.4 Normal Method Invocation Completion 18 2.6.5 Abrupt Method Invocation Completion 18 2.7 Representation of Objects 19 2.8 Floating-Point Arithmetic 19 2.8.1 Java Virtual Machine Floating-Point Arithmetic and IEEE 754 19 2.8.2 Floating-Point Modes 20 2.8.3 Value
    [Show full text]
  • Java (Software Platform) from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Not to Be Confused with Javascript
    Java (software platform) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Not to be confused with JavaScript. This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone , or spelling. You can assist by editing it. (February 2016) Java (software platform) Dukesource125.gif The Java technology logo Original author(s) James Gosling, Sun Microsystems Developer(s) Oracle Corporation Initial release 23 January 1996; 20 years ago[1][2] Stable release 8 Update 73 (1.8.0_73) (February 5, 2016; 34 days ago) [±][3] Preview release 9 Build b90 (November 2, 2015; 4 months ago) [±][4] Written in Java, C++[5] Operating system Windows, Solaris, Linux, OS X[6] Platform Cross-platform Available in 30+ languages List of languages [show] Type Software platform License Freeware, mostly open-source,[8] with a few proprietary[9] compo nents[10] Website www.java.com Java is a set of computer software and specifications developed by Sun Microsyst ems, later acquired by Oracle Corporation, that provides a system for developing application software and deploying it in a cross-platform computing environment . Java is used in a wide variety of computing platforms from embedded devices an d mobile phones to enterprise servers and supercomputers. While less common, Jav a applets run in secure, sandboxed environments to provide many features of nati ve applications and can be embedded in HTML pages. Writing in the Java programming language is the primary way to produce code that will be deployed as byte code in a Java Virtual Machine (JVM); byte code compil ers are also available for other languages, including Ada, JavaScript, Python, a nd Ruby.
    [Show full text]
  • A Security Policy Oracle: Detecting Security Holes Using Multiple API Implementations
    A Security Policy Oracle: Detecting Security Holes Using Multiple API Implementations Varun Srivastava Michael D. Bond Kathryn S. McKinley Vitaly Shmatikov Yahoo! The Ohio State University The University of Texas at Austin varun [email protected] [email protected] fmckinley,[email protected] Abstract 1. Introduction Even experienced developers struggle to implement security poli- Demand for secure software is increasing, but ensuring that soft- cies correctly. For example, despite 15 years of development, stan- ware is secure remains a challenge. Developers are choosing dard Java libraries still suffer from missing and incorrectly applied memory-safe systems [9, 39] and languages such as Java and permission checks, which enable untrusted applications to execute C# in part because they improve security by reducing memory- native calls or modify private class variables without authorization. corruption attacks. Even memory-safe systems, however, rely on Previous techniques for static verification of authorization enforce- the access-rights model to ensure that the program has the appro- ment rely on manually specified policies or attempt to infer the pol- priate permissions before performing sensitive actions. Unfortu- icy by code-mining. Neither approach guarantees that the policy nately, even experienced developers find it difficult to specify and used for verification is correct. implement access-rights policies correctly. Consequently, semantic In this paper, we exploit the fact that many modern APIs have mistakes—such as missing permission checks which enable mali- multiple, independent implementations. Our flow- and context- cious code to bypass protection—have become a significant cause sensitive analysis takes as input an API, multiple implementations of security vulnerabilities [26].
    [Show full text]
  • Security Issue with JRE 1.7.0 51
    Security Issue with JRE 1.7.0_51 Issue With recent version of Java release 1.7.0_51 users encounter security warning messages, when signed applets are run within Internet Explorer. In such environments, customers using ISD 11.2 and earlier versions might see the following Warnings or error messages. 1. This application will be blocked in a future Java security update because the JAR file manifest does not contain the Permissions attribute. Please contact the Publisher for more information. 2. java.lang.SecurityException: Missing required Permissions manifest attribute in main jar: http://demo.com/ISD/websignsunjvm.jar Fix The security warning issue can be solved by following any one of the following two fixes. First one is a work around solution and the second one involves updating the websignsunjvm.jar (which has all the required entries to overcome security warning). Fix 1 Adding the domain name of the web site hosting ISD WebSign Java applet to trusted list of Java Plug-in will resolve this issue. Follow the steps below to 1. Open Java Control Panel Applet (Start->Programs->Control Panel-> Java). 2. Go to Security Tab and click on Edit Site List... Button under Exception Site List section. 3. Click on Add button to enter the location e.g. http://demo.com/ (is the domain or server name where the applet is hosted or published) and click on OK button. Adding non HTTPS sites might show some warning messages, ignore them. 4. Next step is to clean the Plug-in cache. Go To General tab, click on Setting button under Temporary Internet Files and click on delete files.
    [Show full text]