DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Task Force Reviewing the Fiesta Bowl

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Task Force Reviewing the Fiesta Bowl REPORT OF THE TASK FORCE REVIEWING THE FIESTA BOWL This report (the “Report”) contains the recommendations of the task force appointed by the BCS Presidential Oversight Committee (the “Task Force”) to review the relationship between the 11 NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision conferences and the University of Notre Dame (the “BCS Group”), which participate in the Bowl Championship Series arrangement (the “BCS”), and the Arizona Sports Foundation and related entities that own and operate the Fiesta Bowl.1 Executive Summary In March of 2011, BCS Presidential Oversight Committee chairman Graham Spanier, President of Penn State University, appointed a task force to determine what response the BCS group should make to a 276-page report relative to the Fiesta Bowl that was released by the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of the organization. Dr. Spanier personally chaired the Task Force. The other members are: John Peters, President of Northern Illinois University; Bob Bowlsby, Director of Athletics at Stanford University; Jeremy Foley, Director of Athletics at the University of Florida; Richard Giannini, Director of Athletics at the University of Southern Mississippi; John Marinatto, Commissioner of the Big East Conference; and Wright Waters, Commissioner of the Sun Belt Conference. Bill Hancock, Executive Director of the Bowl Championship Series, serves ex officio. The Task Force believes that the board of directors of the Fiesta Bowl failed in its responsibility to properly oversee the management and administration of the Bowl. The Board allowed executive staff to have extraordinary leeway in making decisions without paying heed to checks and balances to ensure that the Bowl was run in a proper and ethical manner. The Task Force is deeply troubled by the evidence set forth in the Special Committee’s report. That evidence strongly suggests that the Bowl’s executive staff frequently acted with scant regard for ethics and proper conduct. Further, it is the opinion of the Task Force that the Bowl’s board of directors over the years was negligent in its oversight responsibilities. That lax oversight, however, ended 1 The Arizona Sports Foundation is the principal entity in a larger enterprise that operates bowl games in Phoenix. The Arizona Sports Foundation is the entity that owns and manages the annual Fiesta Bowl football games and a number of the other events that are part of the bowl experience generally. The conferences and institutions participating in the BCS also contract with the Arizona College Football Championship Foundation, which manages the BCS National Championship when it is hosted in the Phoenix area once every four years. In addition, there are two other entities, Fiesta Events, Inc. and The Valley of the Sun Foundation, with which the conferences and institutions do not contract as part of the BCS, but which operate events related to the Fiesta Bowl. It is the understanding of the Task Force that all four entities are under the control of the same board of directors and managed by the same executive staff. While the Task Force has expressed concern to Fiesta Bowl representatives about the existence of multiple separate entities, the distinctions among them are not material for purposes of the Task Force’s recommendation. For ease of reference, this Report does not distinguish between or among the entities but simply refers to them as the “Fiesta Bowl” or “Bowl.” when the current board chairman received evidence of inappropriate conduct and acted with other board members to create the Special Committee and empower it with broad, independent investigative authority. The Task Force conducted six telephone conferences and met in person once. Fiesta Bowl representatives met with the Task Force for three hours on April 23 and expressed deep remorse. They presented a detailed “reveal and reform” approach, which is appropriate and necessary, but nevertheless the Task Force believes that additional measures and corrective actions are required. Had current board chairman Duane Woods and his colleagues not created the Special Committee and had that committee not produced such a thorough and open report, and had the board not already developed significant reforms, this Task Force almost certainly would have recommended the termination of the BCS Group’s involvement with the Fiesta Bowl. The Task Force commends the board of the Fiesta Bowl for the reforms it presented and has already developed. Nevertheless, the Task Force has concluded that additional reforms are needed, and is recommending sanctions. The Special Committee created by the Fiesta Bowl board was chaired by Justice Ruth McGregor, a respected jurist and former member of the Arizona Supreme Court, and was prepared by out- of-state counsel independent of the Fiesta Bowl Board of Directors. Although the Special Committee’s report makes no findings of fact or conclusions of law, it does recite in detail the evidence the investigation uncovered. Broadly speaking, the report cited evidence of inappropriate conduct in four areas: (1) reimbursement of campaign contributions; (2) the initial Grant Woods investigation; (3) expenses and reimbursements; and (4) gifts. Additionally, the Special Committee’s report cites allegations of a cover-up. While believing that the Fiesta Bowl should remain a BCS game, the Task Force recommends the following additional corrective courses of action in order for the Bowl to remain a part of the BCS. These sanctions are the result of the severity of the problems that have come to light, and are also necessary to make certain the Fiesta Bowl officials will conduct their affairs in an ethical and proper way in the future. 1. A $1 Million Sanction: The Task Force calls for a minimum $1 million sanction in the form of a mandatory distribution to charities recommended by the BCS Group. Further, the Bowl should make an additional mandatory distribution to charities recommended by the BCS Group of any funds recovered from individuals or entities as a result of the - 2 - evidence uncovered by the Special Committee’s investigation. It is the intention of the BCS Group to recommend charities that benefit youth in Arizona. 2. Board of Directors: The Task Force expects that persons who were members of the Fiesta Bowl board and for which the Special Committee’s report found substantial evidence of inappropriate conduct will be removed from the board immediately. Further, the Task Force expects that any board members who may subsequently be implicated in any inappropriate conduct or wrongdoing as a result of investigations by government agencies will be removed from the board immediately upon those revelations. 3. Collegiate Officials on New Board: Fiesta Bowl representatives have developed new criteria for serving on the board. It is expected that individuals with appropriate business, not-for-profit, and other relevant executive experience be appointed to the board to enhance management experience and oversight. The Task Force believes those are steps in the right direction. The Task Force is concerned, however, that merely having persons with such credentials is not enough. The Task Force recommends that at least two members of the Fiesta Bowl board should be drawn from among the collegiate community, such as university presidents or other senior administrators, faculty representatives, or athletic directors. One of the members from among the higher education community should be drawn from outside the state of Arizona. 4. Independent Audit of Internal Controls: The evidence uncovered by the Special Committee suggests that the Fiesta Bowl operated without adequate internal controls. Accordingly, for the duration of the current contract, the Fiesta Bowl annually must have an independent audit of its internal controls and must share the results of that audit with the BCS Executive Director. 5. More Probing and Extensive Financial Audit: Based on the failure of the Fiesta Bowl to reveal financial irregularities, the Task Force believes that the Fiesta Bowl must either replace its auditing firm or require that a new supervisory partner be engaged. The Task Force also believes that the Fiesta Bowl must have a more thorough annual financial audit appropriate for not-for-profit entities and consistent with best practices for such organizations. The results of the audit should be shared with the BCS Executive Director. 6. Increased Accountability: To ensure accountability, representatives of the Fiesta Bowl and representatives of the BCS Group must meet no less than annually to review: (i) the reforms implemented by the Fiesta Bowl; (ii) the governance, operation, and management of the Fiesta Bowl; and (iii) any matters revealed by the audits described in paragraphs 4-5. Frequency of such meetings will be determined by the BCS Group. 7. New Executive Director: The hiring of an Executive Director by the Fiesta Bowl is crucial to the future of the organization. Responsibility for the selection of that person should belong to the Bowl. However, the BCS Executive Director and the chair of the BCS Presidential Oversight Committee should be kept informed of the progress of the hiring process and consulted on the hiring decision. The Task Force encourages the - 3 - Fiesta Bowl to consider candidates for the position who not only have relevant experience in business but also who understand the collegiate athletic model and have the highest ethical standards. While the Task Force’s charge did not extend beyond the Fiesta Bowl, this experience is a reminder of the importance of having in place strict and proper financial and governance procedures at all BCS bowls. Consequently, the Task Force recommends that the BCS Group retain an independent expert with a background in management of non-profit organizations to develop standards for responsible bowl governance. Following the dissemination of such standards, each bowl associated with the BCS will be required to certify annually to the Executive Director of the BCS that it is conducting its business in accordance with the standards.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Football Bowl Game Schedule
    Football Bowl Game Schedule Stacy remains tippy after Derrick skeletonising rifely or present any raylets. Stable and scattering Lucian embrutes her arkose impassibleness hedge and blue-pencils shakily. Aerostatic and jerking Art strafe exponentially and expense his alleviative ahold and journalistically. Comment on the news and join forum at cleveland. PRIMESPORT following month initial communication. Sec football game requirements? He flashes a game, as he utilizes a space away from the conference play at times, and to be. Bowl schedule cancellations TV info and teams opting out. Lewis can play at the ratio level. Postseason bowl games start December 19 and the 2021 College Football Playoff National Championship Game box be played Monday. Get breaking hudson county real estate, schedules yet to shed stronger against no. We invite you to use our commenting platform to engage in insightful conversations about issues in our community. The football player with great body driving defenders off his own pocket setting the latest schedules and sell tickets now assumes with your browser does not. Conferences have different methods by which bowl money is divided among its membership and participating teams. Will loan be football bowl games in 2020? This game will be a big test to see how good Notre Dame actually is. There will be no additional distribution to conferences whose teams qualify for the national championship game. Playing in bowl games and scheduled to date financial hardship and more comfortable and relevant experience on the underdog that up for the second day! Game Date Tickets Match-Up 5 Frisco Frisco TX 650000 121920 700pm ESPN Tickets American vs CUSAMACMWC Canceled for 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Orange Bowl Committee
    ORANGE BOWL COMMITTEE The Orange Bowl Committee ................................................................................................2 Orange Bowl Mission..............................................................................................................4 Orange Bowl in the Community ............................................................................................5 Orange Bowl Schedule of Events ......................................................................................6-7 The Orange Bowl and the Atlantic Coast Conference ......................................................8 Hard Rock Stadium ..................................................................................................................9 College Football Playoff ..................................................................................................10-11 QUICK FACTS Orange Bowl History........................................................................................................12-19 Orange Bowl Committee Orange Bowl Year-by-Year Results................................................................................20-22 14360 NW 77th Ct. Miami Lakes, FL 33016 Orange Bowl Game-By-Game Recaps..........................................................................23-50 (305) 341-4700 – Main (305) 341-4750 – Fax National Champions Hosted by the Orange Bowl ............................................................51 Capital One Orange Bowl Media Headquarters Orange Bowl Year-By-Year Stats ..................................................................................52-54
    [Show full text]
  • University of Pittsburgh Vs. Oregon State
    DECEMBER 31, 2008 • SUN BOWL STADIUM • EL PASO, TX UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH VS. OREGON STATE 44913_CvrC3.indd913_CvrC3.indd 1 112/22/082/22/08 99:32:45:32:45 AAMM 44913_CvrC3.indd913_CvrC3.indd 2 112/22/082/22/08 99:32:54:32:54 AAMM 2008 Brut Sun Bowl Table of Contents Quick Facts TOC/Quick Facts ......................................................................1 Location ..............................................................Pittsburgh, Pa. Bowl Media and Travel Information ......................................2 Enrollment .........................................................................33,574 Pitt Depth Chart ........................................................................3 Founded ................................................................................1787 Pitt Rosters ..............................................................................4-5 Conference .....................................................................Big East Game Information and Notes .............................................6-12 Nickname ..................................................................... Panthers Broadcasters Guide .................................................................13 Colors ..................................................................Blue and Gold Head Coach Dave Wannstedt ..........................................14-16 Chancellor ...............................................Mark A. Nordenberg Coaching Staff .....................................................................17-29
    [Show full text]
  • THE BOWL 'CHARITY' SERIES the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) Plays a Major Role in the World of College Athletics. Every
    THE BOWL ‘CHARITY’ SERIES The Bowl Championship Series (BCS) plays a major role in the world of college athletics. Every year, the BCS decides the NCAA Division I football National Champion. The BCS is comprised of four “Bowl Organizations” that each enjoy 501(c)(3) tax exempt status as charitable public benefit organizations, and each has done so since World War II. These Bowl Organizations are the Rose Bowl, the Sugar Bowl, the Orange Bowl, and the Fiesta Bowl. The IRS, in their Letters of Recognition of 501(c)(3) status to each Bowl Organization, states that the public benefit these organizations offer is “educational.” Despite being considered “charitable” organizations for tax purposes, the BCS Bowl Organizations are currently under attack for instead serving private interests. Although the actual percentage of revenues a “charitable” organization donates to charitable causes is not a true indicia of being considered a “charitable organization” for 501(c)(3) status, it is a good measurement to compare with an organization’s other expenditures. In 2011, the BCS held 23 bowl games that produced $186.3 million. The total charitable contribution for the BCS was $3.2 million, or a mere 1.7% of revenue. When considering whether a Bowl Organization fails the private inurement requirement of the operational test for 501(c)(3) status, it will not “look good” if the organization paid its Executive Officers more in salary and benefits than money they donated to charitable causes.1 The most criticized Bowl Organization of the four is surely the Fiesta Bowl. In the last Fiesta Bowl on January 2013, the Oregon Ducks defeated the Kansas State Wildcats in Glendale, AZ.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 - 2014 Media Guide
    2013 - 2014 MEDIA GUIDE www.bcsfootball.org The Coaches’ Trophy Each year the winner of the BCS National Champi- onship Game is presented with The Coaches’ Trophy in an on-field ceremony after the game. The current presenting sponsor of the trophy is Dr Pepper. The Coaches’ Trophy is a trademark and copyright image owned by the American Football Coaches As- sociation. It has been awarded to the top team in the Coaches’ Poll since 1986. The USA Today Coaches’ Poll is one of the elements in the BCS Standings. The Trophy — valued at $30,000 — features a foot- ball made of Waterford® Crystal and an ebony base. The winning institution retains The Trophy for perma- nent display on campus. Any portrayal of The Coaches’ Trophy must be li- censed through the AFCA and must clearly indicate the AFCA’s ownership of The Coaches’ Trophy. Specific licensing information and criteria and a his- tory of The Coaches’ Trophy are available at www.championlicensing.com. TABLE OF CONTENTS AFCA Football Coaches’ Trophy ............................................IFC Table of Contents .........................................................................1 BCS Media Contacts/Governance Groups ...............................2-3 Important Dates ...........................................................................4 The 2013-14 Bowl Championship Series ...............................5-11 The BCS Standings ....................................................................12 College Football Playoff .......................................................13-14
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Sec Bowl Agreements
    2019 SEC BOWL AGREEMENTS The Southeastern Conference has agreements with nine comprised of the Outback Bowl in Tampa (vs. Big Ten), Frank- postseason bowls, not including College Football Playoff/New lin American Mortgage Music City Bowl in Nashville (vs. ACC/ Year’s Six games, and a process for the assignment of SEC mem- Big Ten), TaxSlayer Gator Bowl in Jacksonville (vs. ACC/Big ber schools to bowl games that began with the 2014 season and Ten), AutoZone Liberty Bowl in Memphis (vs. Big 12), Academy extending for six years through the 2019 season. Sports + Outdoors Texas Bowl in Houston (vs. Big 12) and Belk The current SEC bowl process coincided with the begin- Bowl in Charlotte (vs. ACC). In consultation with SEC member ning of the College Football Playoff that followed the 2014 col- institutions, as well as these six bowls, the conference will make lege football season. The SEC also participates in the Allstate the assignments for the bowl games in the pool system. Sugar Bowl and the Capital One Orange Bowl (in selected The SEC also has a relationship with both the Birmingham years). Under the current SEC bowl system, the Citrus Bowl in Bowl (vs. American) and the Walk-On’s Independence Bowl Orlando (vs. Big Ten), a longtime SEC bowl, will have the first in Shreveport (vs. ACC). The Birmingham Bowl will have the selection of available SEC teams after any conference schools first selection of available teams following the pool of six bowls. have qualified for the College Football Playoff, New Year’s Six, or The Independence Bowl will have the next selection of available the Allstate Sugar Bowl.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Em All: How the Ncaa's Dominance of the College Basketball Postseason Reveals There Will Never Be an Ncaa F
    YOU CAN’T WIN ‘EM ALL: HOW THE NCAA’S DOMINANCE OF THE COLLEGE BASKETBALL POSTSEASON REVEALS THERE WILL NEVER BE AN NCAA FOOTBALL PLAYOFF ERIC THIEME* INTRODUCTION The debate over how to decide the Division I-A1 college Football National Championship has long been raging and seems to intensify each year.2 Division I-A College Football is the only National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”) sport that does not crown a champion through the use of an NCAA sponsored playoff system.3 Instead, schools, through their respective conferences, along with bowl game organizers and television networks have formed an agreement known as the Bowl Championship Series (“BCS”) through which a national champion is decided.4 The agreement involves the use of human polls and a computer generated formula to rank teams and then place the two top-ranked teams in a postseason bowl game to decide the national championship.5 The system has been hailed in years, such as 2005, when the top two teams are both undefeated and there are no other undefeated teams in the top 25. However in years such as 2004, when there are more than two undefeated teams ranked in the top-five in the country, the BCS has been severely criticized.6 * J.D. Candidate, 2007, Indiana University School of Law—Indianapolis; B.S., 2003, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio. I would like to thank my loving wife, Ries, for her constant support and the Jarvis family for entertaining her while I wrote this. This Note was composed primarily between the 2005 and 2006 college football seasons.
    [Show full text]
  • NEBRASKA TEAM BOWL GAME RECORDS Team Records Punting Total Offense » Most Punts
    NEBRASKA FOOTBALL BOWL RECORDS PAGE 77 NEBRASKA TEAM BOWL GAME RECORDS Team Records Punting Total Offense » Most Punts ....................................................10; 1980 Cotton Bowl vs. Houston » Most Plays ...........................................................94; 2014 Holiday Bowl vs. USC » Best Average ............................................. 51.5; 2005 Alamo Bowl vs. Michigan » Most Yards .......................................... 636; 2000 Alamo Bowl vs. Northwestern Scoring » Fewest Yards ................................................... 110; 1955 Orange Bowl vs. Duke » Most Points........................................... 66; 2000 Alamo Bowl vs. Northwestern » Best Per-Play Average ..........................7.7; 2000 Alamo Bowl vs. Northwestern » Most Touchdowns .................................. 9; 2000 Alamo Bowl vs. Northwestern » Most First Downs .....................................31; 2015 Foster Farms Bowl vs. UCLA » Largest Margin of Victory .................... 49; 2000 Alamo Bowl vs. Northwestern » Fewest First Downs ............................................. 6; 1955 Orange Bowl vs. Duke » Largest Margin of Defeat .................................. 27; 1955 Orange Bowl vs. Duke Rushing .........................................................................27; 1967 Sugar Bowl vs. Alabama » Most Attempts ..................................... 69; 2000 Alamo Bowl vs. Northwestern » Most Points in a Loss ..........................................42; 2014 Holiday Bowl vs. USC » Most Yards ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from Post-Season College Football Bowls,” Rand Journal of Economics, 38, 4, Winter 2007, 967-982
    Fréchette, Guillaume, Alvin E. Roth, and M. Utku Ünver, “Unraveling Yields Inefficient Matchings: Evidence from Post-Season College Football Bowls,” Rand Journal of Economics, 38, 4, Winter 2007, 967-982. Unraveling yields inefficient matchings: evidence from post-season college football bowls Guillaume R. Fréchette1 Alvin E. Roth2 M. Utku Ünver3,4 Current draft: April 18, 2007 Abstract: Many markets have “unraveled” and experienced inefficient, early, dispersed transactions, and subsequently developed institutions to delay transaction timing. However, it has previously proved difficult to measure and identify the resulting efficiency gains. Prior to 1992, college football teams were matched for post-season play up to several weeks before the end of the regular season. Since 1992, the market has reorganized to postpone this matching. We show that the matching of teams affects efficiency as measured by the resulting television viewership, and the reorganization promoted more efficient matching, chiefly due to the increased ability of later matching to produce “championship” games. 1 1. Introduction Many market institutions have evolved to coordinate the timing of transactions, and to prevent them from taking place too early, or at uncoordinated times. Some prominent examples of markets in which early transactions have been a problem are markets for new physicians, for new law graduates (particularly those who seek Federal appellate clerkships), and for undergraduate college admissions.5 At some points in the history of each of these markets, transactions have unraveled, i.e. have tended to be finalized earlier and earlier in advance of when the transacted relationship would begin (i.e. increasingly before graduation from medical school, law school, or high school).
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar Bowl Well Prepared for National Championship Game October 2007 Vol
    Sugar Bowl well prepared for national championship game October 2007 Vol. 45, No. 4 Allstate Sugar Bowl staff mem- about a 10-15 minute bus ride from the bers moved back into their Louisiana Su- press hotels. There also will be a media perdome Offices in the middle of Sep- work room at the main press hotel, which Inside this issue: tember and also shared their two-bowl was relatively unscathed by Katrina and hosting plans for this coming January. is actually much newer than the Hyatt. From the perspective of FWAA offi- The FWAA Awards Breakfast on the cers and staff, the bowl appears to have day of the game and the earlier FWAA fully recovered from the effects of Hurri- Board Meeting will be held at the press cane Katrina in 2005, which forced the hotel, which also will have security check President Mike Griffith comments on Okla- bowl to move its 2006 game to Atlanta. points into the media interview and hos- 2 The 2007 Allstate Sugar Bowl Game pitality areas and work room. homa State coach was played at the Louisiana Superdome The Louisiana Superdome has had a Mike Gundy between LSU and Notre Dame. But this stunning makeover from the images eve- coming January will be the first time the ryone saw during the Katrina evacuation. bowl will under go the double-hosting In the largest stadium rebuilding project format — the Allstate Sugar Bowl on Jan. in history, approximately $193 million 1 and then the Allstate BCS National already has been pumped into the build- Championship Game on Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bowl Championship Series: Is It Fair and in Compliance with Antitrust Law?
    S. HRG. 111–352 THE BOWL CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES: IS IT FAIR AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH ANTITRUST LAW? HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ANTITRUST, COMPETITION POLICY AND CONSUMER RIGHTS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 7, 2009 Serial No. J–111–35 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 55–645 PDF WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:36 Apr 13, 2010 Jkt 055645 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\55645.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman HERB KOHL, Wisconsin JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah RUSSELL D. FEINGOLD, Wisconsin CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York JON KYL, Arizona RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland JOHN CORNYN, Texas SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island TOM COBURN, Oklahoma AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota EDWARD E. KAUFMAN, Delaware ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania AL FRANKEN, Minnesota BRUCE A. COHEN, Chief Counsel and Staff Director MATT MINER, Republican Chief Counsel SUBCOMMITTEE ON ANTITRUST, COMPETITION POLICY AND CONSUMER RIGHTS HERB KOHL, Wisconsin, Chairman CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island CHARLES E. GRASSLEY, Iowa AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota TOM COBURN, Oklahoma EDWARD E. KAUFMAN, Delaware ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania AL FRANKEN, Minnesota CAROLINA HOLLAND, Democratic Chief Counsel/Staff Director JACE JOHNSON, Republican Chief Counsel (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:36 Apr 13, 2010 Jkt 055645 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\55645.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Kohl, Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • College Football Bowl Schedule 2020-2021
    College Football Bowl Schedule 2020 -2021 C Bowl Matchup Date Time (ET) 2:30 PM Myrtle Beach Bowl North Texas vs Appalachian St. Mon. Dec 21 3:30 PM Famous Idaho Potato Bowl Tulane vs Nevada Tue. Dec 22 7:00 PM RoofClaim.com Boca Raton Bowl BYU vs UCF Tue. Dec 22 3:30 PM R+L Carriers New Orleans Bowl Georgia Southern vs Louisiana Tech Wed. Dec 23 7:00 PM Montgomery Bowl Florida Atlantic vs Memphis Wed. Dec 23 3:30 PM New Mexico Bowl Hawaii vs Houston Thu. Dec 24 2:30 PM Camellia Bowl Buffalo vs Marshall Fri. Dec 25 12:00 PM Union Home Mortgage Gasparilla Bowl South Carolina vs UAB Sat. Dec 26 12:00 PM Cure Bowl Liberty vs Coastal Carolina Sat. Dec 26 3:30 PM Lending Tree Bowl Western Kentucky vs Georgia St. Sat. Dec 26 Sat. Dec 26 3:30 PM SERVPRO First Responder Bowl UTSA vs Louisiana Tue. Dec 29 5:30 PM Cheez-It Bowl Oklahoma St. vs Miami 9:00 PM Valero Alamo Bowl Texas vs Colorado Tue. Dec 29 12:00 PM Duke’s Mayo Bowl Wake Forest vs Wisconsin Wed. Dec 30 3:30 PM TransPerfect Music City Bowl Missouri vs Iowa Wed. Dec 30 7:15 PM Goodyear Cotton Bowl Oklahoma vs Florida Wed. Dec 30 12:00 PM Lockheed Martin Armed Forces Bowl Mississippi St. vs Tulsa Thu. Dec 31 2:00 PM Arizona Bowl San Jose St. vs Ball St. Thu. Dec 31 4:00 PM Autozone Liberty Bowl Tennessee vs West Virginia Thu.
    [Show full text]