Surface and Boundary Layer Parameterization Pathways of Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Surface and Boundary Layer Parameterization Pathways of Information Surface and boundary layer parameterization Pathways of Information Clouds (CP/MP) Radiation Surface The “atmosphere” Boundary Layer Surface Layer Typical boundary layer evolution over land Parametrization of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) Martin Köhler & Anton Beljaars • Introduction. Martin • Surface layer and surface fluxes. Anton • Outer layer. Martin • Stratocumulus. Martin • PBL evaluation. Maike • Exercises. Martin & Maike Los Angeles PBL July 2001 Downtown LA PBL top 10km Griffith Observatory 1000 to 10000 die annually in LA from heart disease resulting from SMOG. California stratocumulus and forest fires Wolf Fire (6 June 2002) Downtown LA MODIS on Terra (res. 250m) visibleearth.nasa.gov Boundary layer: definition The PBL is the layer close to the surface within which vertical transports by turbulence play dominant roles in the momentum, heat and moisture budgets. Turbulent flows are characterized by fluctuating dynamical quantities in space and time in a “disordered” manner (Monin and Yaglon, 1973). Why is PBL turbulent? -5 2 • high Reynolds numbers Re = UL/ν > 2000, ν ~ 10 m /s g ∂θv θv ∂z • low Richardson number Ri = 2 <1/ 4 ⎛ ∂u ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ∂z ⎠ Laboratory observations: transition to turbulence Laboratory observations: laminar and turbulent BL Space and time scales • Diffusive transport in the atmosphere is dominated by turbulence. • Time scale of turbulence varies from seconds to half hour. • Length scale varies from mm for dissipative eddies to 100 m for transporting eddies. • The largest eddies are the most efficient ones for transport. cyclones microscale turbulence diurnal cycle spectral gap data: 1957 100 hours 1 hour 0.01 hour Power spectrum … which spectral gap? 10-2 Cabauw Data 1987 (10m) 24h diurnal harmonics 10-3 12h 30-80 days cyclones (t,radiative) 8h 10-4 10-5 cyclones t-5/3 -6 diurnal 10 cycle Power Spectrum of Wind / Period Wind Power of Spectrum 10-7 spectral gap Brookhaven Data 1957 10-8 10000 1000 100 10 1 Period in Hours 10000 hours 100 hours 1 hour Spectrum from time series of wind (Stratus buoy) Amplitude spectrum ( Power spectrum ) -5/6 (3D turbulence) diurnal cycle 24 hours 2 hours Wave number spectra near tropopause 5000 km k-3 cyclones 500 km k-5/3 2 km shifted GASP aircraft data near tropopause Nastrom and Gage (1985) Wave number spectra at z=150m below stratocumulus U Spectrum Reynolds Decomposition? V Spectrum W Spectrum 500m Duynkerke 1998 T-tendencies due to turbulence scheme [K/day] Jan. 1999 T-tendencies due to convection scheme [K/day] Jan. 1999 U-Profile … Effects of Terrain z0~1-10cm z0~50cm z0~1m Ocean:! uz* Neutral: U = ln z0~0.1-1mm κ z0 Oke 1978 U-Profile … Effects of Stability Neutral Stable Unstable " Height " uz* Neutral: U = ln κ z0 ln (Height) surface layer Oke 1978 Diurnal cycle of boundary layer height Sunrise Sunset (residual BL) Local Time stable BL convective BL stable BL Oke 1978 Diurnal cycle of profiles convective BL stable BL Oke 1978 Conserved variables For turbulent transport in the vertical, quantities are needed that are conserved for adiabatic ascent/descent. R/c p For dry processes: θ = T( po / p) , pot. temperature dry static energy or s = cpT + gz. Lθ For moist processes: θl =θ − ( )ql , liq. wat. pot. temperature cpT or sl = cpT + gz − Lql , liq. water static energy and qt = q + ql . total water Buoyancy parameter unstable stable To determine static stability, move a fluid parcel adiabatically in the vertical and compare the density of the parcel with the density of the surrounding fluid. dθ dθ v < 0 v > 0 Virtual potential temperature and dz dz virtual dry static energy are suitable parameters to describe stability: {1 ( Rv 1)q q }, θv =θ + Rd − − l s c T{1 ( Rv 1)q q } gz, Rv 1 0.61 v = p + Rd − − l + Rd − ≈ Basic equations ∂u ∂u ∂u ∂u 1 ∂p 2 + u + v + w − fv = − +ν∇ u ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z ρ ∂x mom. ∂v ∂v ∂v ∂v 1 ∂p 2 + u + v + w + fu = − +ν∇ v equ.’s ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z ρ ∂y ∂w ∂w ∂w ∂w 1 ∂p 2 + u + v + w = − +ν∇ w − g ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z ρ ∂z ∂u ∂v ∂w 1 dρ continuity + + = ∂x ∂y ∂z ρ dt Reynolds decomposition u =U + u', v =V + v', w =W + w' ρ = ρo + ρ', p = P + p'. Substitute, apply averaging operator, Boussinesq approximation (density in buoyancy terms only) and hydrostatic approximation (vertical acceleration << buoyancy). Averaging (overbar) is over grid box, i.e. sub-grid turbulent motion is averaged out. Property of averaging operator: u ≡U + u' =U ≡U After Reynolds decomposition and averaging ∂U ∂U ∂U ∂U 1 ∂P 2 +U +V +W − fV = − +ν∇ U nd ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z ρo ∂x 2 order ∂u'u' ∂u'v' ∂u'w' − − − ∂x ∂y ∂z ∂V ∂V ∂V ∂V 1 ∂P 2 +U +V +W + fU = − +ν∇ V nd ∂t ∂x ∂y ∂z ρo ∂y 2 order ∂u'v' ∂v'v' ∂v'w' − − − ∂x ∂y ∂z 1 ∂P 0 = − − g ρo ∂z ∂U ∂V ∂W + + = 0 ∂x ∂y ∂z The 2nd order correlations are unknown (closure problem) and need to be parametrized (i.e. expressed in terms of large scale variables). Reynolds equations Boundary layer approximation ∂u'u' ∂u'w' << (horizontal scales >> vertical scales), e.g. : ∂x ∂z High Reynolds number approximation ∂u'w' ν∇2U << (molecular diffusion << turbulent transports), e.g.: ∂z ∂∂∂∂UUUU1'' ∂∂ Puw +++U V W− fV =− − ∂∂∂txyz ∂ρo ∂∂ xz ∂∂∂∂VVVV1'' ∂∂ Pvw ++++=U V W fU − − ∂∂∂txyz ∂ρo ∂∂ yz Reynolds Stress Simple closures K-diffusion method: ∂U u'w' ≈ −K ∂z ∂∂∂uw'' U ∂2 analogy to ⎛⎞KKU ≈−⎜⎟ ≈−2 molecular diffusion ∂∂zz⎝⎠ ∂ z ∂ z Mass-flux method: up u'w' ≈ M (u −U ) mass flux (needs M closure) ∂ up up u = −ε(u −U ) entraining plume model ∂z Turbulent Kinetic Energy equation local TKE: Euvw'1/2('≡22++ ' ') 2 mean TKE: E ≡1/ 2(u'2 + v'2 + w'2 ) Derive equation for E by combining equations of total velocity components and mean velocity components: Storage Mean flow TKE advection ∂∂∂∂EEEE +++UVW = Pressure ∂∂∂txyz ∂ correlation ∂∂∂∂UVgpw'' −−Ew' ' uw ' ' −− vw ' 'ρε ' w ' +− ∂∂∂∂zzzzρρo Turbulent Shear production Buoyancy transport Dissipation Mixed layer turbulent kinetic energy budget dry PBL Stull 1988 normalized Literature General: Stull (1988): An introduction to boundary layer meteorology, Kluwer publishers. Oke(1978): Boundary layer climate, Halsted press. Boundary layer in large scale atmospheric models: Holtslag and Duynkerke (eds., 1999): Clear and cloudy boundary layers, North Holland Press. Surface fluxes: Brutsaert (1982): Evaporation into the atmosphere, Reidel publishers. Sensitivity of ECMWF boundary layer scheme: Beljaars (1995): The impact of some aspects of the boundary layer scheme in the ECMWF model, ECMWF-seminar 1994. Parametrization of surface fluxes: Outline • Surface layer (Monin Obukhov) similarity • Surface fluxes: Alternative formulations • Roughness length over land – Definition – Orographic contribution – Roughness lengths for heat and moisture • Ocean surface fluxes – Roughness lengths and transfer coefficients – Low wind speeds and the limit of free convection – Air-sea coupling at low wind speeds: Impact training course: boundary layer; surface layer Mixing across steep gradients Stable BL Dry mixed layer Cloudy BL θ θ θ Surface flux parametrization is sensitive because of large gradients near the surface. training course: boundary layer; surface layer Boundary conditions for T and q have different character over land and ocean Surface fluxes of heat and moisture are proportional to temperature and moisture differences: Lowest model level T1,q1 HcCUTT=ρ pH1 ()1 − s H E z1 ECUqq=ρ Es1 ()1 − Ts, qs Surface Ocean boundary condition Land boundary condition TT= s HEQG++=λ qq= () T cC U() T T C U { q q ()} T Q G sat s ρρλαpH1111− s+ E− sats += training course: boundary layer; surface layer Parametrization of surface fluxes: Outline • Surface layer (Monin Obukhov) similarity • Surface fluxes: Alternative formulations • Roughness length over land – Definition – Orographic contribution – Roughness lengths for heat and moisture • Ocean surface fluxes – Roughness lengths and transfer coefficients – Low wind speeds and the limit of free convection – Air-sea coupling at low wind speeds: Impact training course: boundary layer; surface layer Surface layer similarity (Monin Obukhov similarity) h For z/h << 1 flux is approximately equal to surface flux. Flux profile Considerations about the nature surface layer of the process: surf . • z/zo >> 1 0 τ o • distance to surface determines turbulence length scale • shear scales with surface Scaling parameters: friction rather than with zo z height or eddy size() m u* friction velocity= τρo /(/) m s −u3 L Obukhov length= * () m g H κ o training θρc course: vp boundary layer; surface layer MO similarity for gradients The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again. ∂Uzκ z φm = is a universal function of ∂zu* L ∂Θ κ z φh = dimensionless shear Stability parameter∂z θ* κφ(von Karman constant) is defined such thatm == 1 forzL / 0 ∂Θ κ z z φh = is a universal function of ∂z θ* L dimensionless Stability parameter z potential temperatureL gradient −1 K 1 Note that with ⎛⎞∂U we obtain: m Kuwm =− ''⎜⎟ = ⎝⎠∂z κϕzu* m training course: boundary layer; surface layer MO gradient functions Observations of φ m as a function of z/L, with κ = 0.4 Empirical gradient functions to describe these observations: −1/ 4 φm = (1−16z / L) for z / L < 0 φm =1+ 5z / L for z / L > 0 unstable stable training course: boundary layer; surface layer Parametrization of surface fluxes: Outline • Surface layer (Monin Obukhov) similarity • Surface fluxes: Alternative formulations • Roughness length over land – Definition
Recommended publications
  • Lecture 7. More on BL Wind Profiles and Turbulent Eddy Structures in This
    Atm S 547 Boundary Layer Meteorology Bretherton Lecture 7. More on BL wind profiles and turbulent eddy structures In this lecture… • Stability and baroclinicity effects on PBL wind and temperature profiles • Large-eddy structures and entrainment in shear-driven and convective BLs. Stability effects on overall boundary layer structure Above the surface layer, the wind profile is also affected by stability. As we mentioned previously, unstable BLs tend to have much more well-mixed wind profiles than stable BLs. Fig. 1 shows observations from the Wangara experiment on how the velocity defects and temperature profile are altered by BL stability (as measured by H/L). Within stability classes, the velocity profiles collapse when scaled with a velocity scale u* and the observed BL depth H, but there is a large difference between the stability classes. Baroclinicity We would expect baroclinicity (vertical shear of geostrophic wind) to also affect the observed wind profile. This is most easily seen for a laminar steady-state Ekman layer in a geostrophic wind with constant vertical shear ug(z) = (G + Mz, Nz), where M = -(g/fT0)∂T/∂y, N = (g/fT0)∂T/∂x. The momentum equations and BCs are: -f(v - Nz) = ν d2u/dz2 f(u - G - Mz) = ν d2v/dz2 u(0) = 0, u(z) ~ G + Mz as z → ∞. v(0) = 0, v(z) ~ Nz as z → ∞. The resultant BL velocity profile is the classical Ekman layer with the thermal wind added onto it. u(z) = G(1 - e-ζ cos ζ) + Mz, (7.1) 1/2 v(z) = G e- ζ sin ζ + Nz.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 20 Wind Turbine Noise Measurements and Abatement
    CHAPTER 20 Wind turbine noise measurements and abatement methods Panagiota Pantazopoulou BRE, Watford, UK. This chapter presents an overview of the types, the measurements and the potential acoustic solutions for the noise emitted from wind turbines. It describes the fre- quency and the acoustic signature of the sound waves generated by the rotating blades and explains how they propagate in the atmosphere. In addition, the avail- able noise measurement techniques are being presented with special focus on the technical challenges that may occur in the measurement process. Finally, a discus- sion on the noise treatment methods from wind turbines referring to a range of the existing abatement methods is being presented. 1 Introduction Wind turbines generate two types of noise: aerodynamic and mechanical. A tur- bine’s sound power is the combined power of both. Aerodynamic noise is gener- ated by the blades passing through the air. The power of aerodynamic noise is related to the ratio of the blade tip speed to wind speed. The mechanical noise is associated with the relevant motion between the various parts inside the nacelle. The compartments move or rotate in order to convert kinetic energy to electricity with the expense of generating sound waves and vibration which is transmitted through the structural parts of the turbine. Depending on the turbine model and the wind speed, the aerodynamic noise may seem like buzzing, whooshing, pulsing, and even sizzling. Downwind tur- bines with their blades downwind of the tower cause impulsive noise which can travel far and become very annoying for people. The low frequency noise gener- ated from a wind turbine is primarily the result of the interaction of the aerody- namic lift on the blades and the atmospheric turbulence in the wind.
    [Show full text]
  • In Classical Fluid Dynamics, a Boundary Layer Is the Layer I
    Atm S 547 Boundary Layer Meteorology Bretherton Lecture 1 Scope of Boundary Layer (BL) Meteorology (Garratt, Ch. 1) In classical fluid dynamics, a boundary layer is the layer in a nearly inviscid fluid next to a surface in which frictional drag associated with that surface is significant (term introduced by Prandtl, 1905). Such boundary layers can be laminar or turbulent, and are often only mm thick. In atmospheric science, a similar definition is useful. The atmospheric boundary layer (ABL, sometimes called P[lanetary] BL) is the layer of fluid directly above the Earth’s surface in which significant fluxes of momentum, heat and/or moisture are carried by turbulent motions whose horizontal and vertical scales are on the order of the boundary layer depth, and whose circulation timescale is a few hours or less (Garratt, p. 1). A similar definition works for the ocean. The complexity of this definition is due to several complications compared to classical aerodynamics. i) Surface heat exchange can lead to thermal convection ii) Moisture and effects on convection iii) Earth’s rotation iv) Complex surface characteristics and topography. BL is assumed to encompass surface-driven dry convection. Most workers (but not all) include shallow cumulus in BL, but deep precipitating cumuli are usually excluded from scope of BLM due to longer time for most air to recirculate back from clouds into contact with surface. Air-surface exchange BLM also traditionally includes the study of fluxes of heat, moisture and momentum between the atmosphere and the underlying surface, and how to characterize surfaces so as to predict these fluxes (roughness, thermal and moisture fluxes, radiative characteristics).
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Effects on Traffic Noise Propagation
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1255 59 Atmospheric Effects on Traffic Noise Propagation ROGER L. WAYSON AND WILLIAM BOWLBY Atmospheric effects on traffic noise propagation have largely L 0 sound level at a reference distance, been ignored during measurements and modeling, even though Ageo attenuation due to geometric spreading, it has generally been accepted that the effects may produce large Ab insertion loss due to diffraction, changes in receiver noise levels. Measurement of traffic noise at L, level increases due to reflection, and multiple locations concurrently with measurement of meteoro­ Ac attenuation due to ground characteristics and envi­ logical data is described. Statistical methods were used to evaluate the data. Atmospheric effects on traffic noise levels were shown ronmental effects. to be significant, even at very short distances; parallel components It should be noted that all levels in dB in this paper are of the wind (which are usually ignored) were important at second 2 row receivers; turbulent scattering increased noise levels near the referenced to 2 x 10-s N/m • ground more than refractive ray bending for short-distance prop­ The last term on the right side of Equation 1, A,, consists agation; and temperature lapse rates were not as important as of three parameters: ground attenuation, attenuation due to wind shear very near the highway. A statistical model was devel­ atmospheric absorption, and attenuation due to atmospheric oped to predict excess attenuations due to atmospheric effects. refraction. (2) Outdoor noise propagation has been studied since the time of the Greek philosopher Chrysippus (240 B. C.). Modern where prediction models have become accurate, and the advent of computers has increased the capabilities of models.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Aerodynamics
    INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS Unit I Wind Energy Collectors INTRODUCTION Air Movement Wind Air Current Circulation The horizontal movement of air along the earth’s surface is called a Wind. The vertical movement of the air is known as an air current. Winds and air current together comprise a system of circulation in the atmosphere. TYPES OF WINDS On the earth’s surface, certain winds blow constantly in a particular direction throughout the year. These are known as the ‘Prevailing Winds’. They are also called the Permanent or the Planetary Winds. Certain winds blow in one direction in one season and in the opposite direction in another. They are known as Periodic Winds. Then, there are Local Winds in different parts of the world. 1. Planetary Winds: There are three main planetary winds that constantly blow in the same direction all around the world. They are also called prevailing or permanent winds. 1.Trade Winds: Blow from the subtropical high pressure belt towards the Equator. They are called the north-east trades in the northern hemisphere and south-east trades in the southern hemisphere. 2.Westerly winds: Blow from the same subtropical high pressure belts, towards 60˚ S and 60˚ N latitude. They are called the sought Westerly wind sin the northern hemisphere and North Westerly winds in the southern hemispheres. 3.Polar Winds Blow from the polar high pressure to the sub polar low pressure area. In the northern hemisphere, their direction is from the north-east. In the southern hemisphere, they blow from the south-east. 2. Periodic Winds These winds are known to blow for a certain time in a certain direction - it may be for a part of a day or a particular season of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Lightweight Aircraft Navigation in the Presence of Wind Cornel-Alexandru Brezoescu
    Small lightweight aircraft navigation in the presence of wind Cornel-Alexandru Brezoescu To cite this version: Cornel-Alexandru Brezoescu. Small lightweight aircraft navigation in the presence of wind. Other. Université de Technologie de Compiègne, 2013. English. NNT : 2013COMP2105. tel-01060415 HAL Id: tel-01060415 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01060415 Submitted on 3 Sep 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Par Cornel-Alexandru BREZOESCU Navigation d’un avion miniature de surveillance aérienne en présence de vent Thèse présentée pour l’obtention du grade de Docteur de l’UTC Soutenue le 28 octobre 2013 Spécialité : Laboratoire HEUDIASYC D2105 Navigation d'un avion miniature de surveillance a´erienneen pr´esencede vent Student: BREZOESCU Cornel Alexandru PHD advisors : LOZANO Rogelio CASTILLO Pedro i ii Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation and objectives . .1 1.2 Challenges . .2 1.3 Approach . .3 1.4 Thesis outline . .4 2 Modeling for control 5 2.1 Basic principles of flight . .5 2.1.1 The forces of flight . .6 2.1.2 Parts of an airplane . .7 2.1.3 Misleading lift theories . 10 2.1.4 Lift generated by airflow deflection .
    [Show full text]
  • ESCI 485 – Air/Sea Interaction Lesson 3 – the Surface Layer References
    ESCI 485 – Air/sea Interaction Lesson 3 – The Surface Layer References: Air-sea Interaction: Laws and Mechanisms , Csanady Structure of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer , Sorbjan THE PLANETARY BOUNDARY LAYER The atmospheric planetary boundary layer (PBL) is that region of the atmosphere in which turbulent fluxes are not negligible. Its depth can vary depending on the stability of the atmosphere. ο In deep convection the PBL can be of the same order as the entire troposphere. ο Usually it is of the order of 1 km or so. The PBL can be further broken down into three layers ο The mixed layer – the upper 90% or so of the PBL in which eddies have nearly mixed properties such as potential temperature, momentum, and moisture. ο The surface layer – The lowest 10% or so of the PBL in which the turbulent fluxes dominate all other terms (Coriolis and PGF) in the momentum equations. ο The viscous sub-layer – A very thin layer (order of cm or less) right near the surface where viscous effects may be important. THE SURFACE LAYER In the surface layer the turbulent momentum flux dominates all other terms in the momentum equations. The surface layer extends upwards on the order of 10 m or so. The Reynolds fluxes (stresses) in the surface layer can be assumed constant with height, and have the same magnitude as the interfacial stress (the stress between the air and water). In the surface layer, the eddy length scale is proportional to the height, z, above the surface. Based on the similarity principle , the following dimensionless group is formed from the friction velocity, eddy length scale, and the mean wind shear z dU = B , (1) u* dz where B is a dimensionless constant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL Or PBL)
    The Atmospheric Boundary Layer (ABL or PBL) • The layer of fluid directly above the Earth’s surface in which significant fluxes of momentum, heat and/or moisture are carried by turbulent motions whose horizontal and vertical scales are on the order of the boundary layer depth, and whose circulation timescale is a few hours or less (Garratt, p. 1). A similar definition works for the ocean. • The complexity of this definition is due to several complications compared to classical aerodynamics: i) Surface heat exchange can lead to thermal convection ii) Moisture and effects on convection iii) Earth’s rotation iv) Complex surface characteristics and topography. Atm S 547 Lecture 1, Slide 1 Sublayers of the atmospheric boundary layer Atm S 547 Lecture 1, Slide 2 Applications and Relevance of BLM i) Climate simulation and NWP ii) Air Pollution and Urban Meteorology iii) Agricultural meteorology iv) Aviation v) Remote Sensing vi) Military Atm S 547 Lecture 1, Slide 3 History of Boundary-Layer Meteorology 1900 – 1910 Development of laminar boundary layer theory for aerodynamics, starting with a seminal paper of Prandtl (1904). Ekman (1905,1906) develops his theory of laminar Ekman layer. 1910 – 1940 Taylor develops basic methods for examining and understanding turbulent mixing Mixing length theory, eddy diffusivity - von Karman, Prandtl, Lettau 1940 – 1950 Kolmogorov (1941) similarity theory of turbulence 1950 – 1960 Buoyancy effects on surface layer (Monin and Obuhkov, 1954). Early field experiments (e. g. Great Plains Expt. of 1953) capable of accurate direct turbulent flux measurements 1960 – 1970 The Golden Age of BLM. Accurate observations of a variety of boundary layer types, including convective, stable and trade- cumulus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Ocean/Sea Subsurface Water Temperature Studies from Remote Sensing and Non-Remote Sensing Methods
    water Review A Review of Ocean/Sea Subsurface Water Temperature Studies from Remote Sensing and Non-Remote Sensing Methods Elahe Akbari 1,2, Seyed Kazem Alavipanah 1,*, Mehrdad Jeihouni 1, Mohammad Hajeb 1,3, Dagmar Haase 4,5 and Sadroddin Alavipanah 4 1 Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417853933, Iran; [email protected] (E.A.); [email protected] (M.J.); [email protected] (M.H.) 2 Department of Climatology and Geomorphology, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar 9617976487, Iran 3 Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran 1983963113, Iran 4 Department of Geography, Humboldt University of Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany; [email protected] (D.H.); [email protected] (S.A.) 5 Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +98-21-6111-3536 Received: 3 October 2017; Accepted: 16 November 2017; Published: 14 December 2017 Abstract: Oceans/Seas are important components of Earth that are affected by global warming and climate change. Recent studies have indicated that the deeper oceans are responsible for climate variability by changing the Earth’s ecosystem; therefore, assessing them has become more important. Remote sensing can provide sea surface data at high spatial/temporal resolution and with large spatial coverage, which allows for remarkable discoveries in the ocean sciences. The deep layers of the ocean/sea, however, cannot be directly detected by satellite remote sensors.
    [Show full text]
  • In Wind and Ocean Currents
    PAPERS IN PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY AND METEOROLOGY PUBLISHED BY MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION (In continuation of Massachusetts Institute of Technology Meteorological Papers) VOL. III, NO.3 THE LAYER OF FRICTIONAL INFLUENCE IN WIND AND OCEAN CURRENTS BY c.-G. ROSSBY AND R. B. MONTGOMERY Contribution No. 71 from the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution .~ J~\ CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS Ap~il, 1935 CONTENTS i. INTRODUCTION 3 II. ADIABATIC ATMOSPHERE. 4 1. Completion of Solution for Adiabatic Atmosphere 4 2. Light Winds and Residual Turbulence 22 3. A Study of the Homogeneous Layer at Boston 25 4. Second Approximation 4° III. INFLUENCE OF STABILITY 44 I. Review 44 2. Stability in the Boundary Layer 47 3. Stability within Entire Frictional Layer 56 IV. ApPLICATION TO DRIFT CURRENTS. 64 I. General Commen ts . 64 2. The Homogeneous Layer 66 3. Analysis of Material 67 4. Results of Analysis . 69 5. Scattering of the Observations and Advection 72 6. Oceanograph Observations 73 7. Wind Drift of the Ice 75 V. LENGTHRELATION BETWEEN THE VELOCITY PROFILE AND THE VALUE OF THE85 MIXING ApPENDIX2.1. StirringTheoretical in Shallow Comments . Water 92. 8885 REFERENCESSUMMARYModified Computation of the Boundary Layer in Drift Currents 9899 92 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of the present paper is to analyze, in a reasonably comprehensive fash- ion, the principal factors controlling the mean state of turbulence and hence the mean velocity distribution in wind and ocean currents near the surface. The plan of the in- vestigation is theoretical but efforts have been made to check each major step or result through an analysis of available measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Near-Surface Boundary Layer: Processes and Turbulence Measurements
    REPORTS IN METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN, 1 - 2010 Ocean near-surface boundary layer: processes and turbulence measurements MOSTAFA BAKHODAY PASKYABI and ILKER FER Geophysical Institute University of Bergen December, 2010 «REPORTS IN METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY» utgis av Geofysisk Institutt ved Universitetet I Bergen. Formålet med rapportserien er å publisere arbeider av personer som er tilknyttet avdelingen. Redaksjonsutvalg: Peter M. Haugan, Frank Cleveland, Arvid Skartveit og Endre Skaar. Redaksjonens adresse er : «Reports in Meteorology and Oceanography», Geophysical Institute. Allégaten 70 N-5007 Bergen, Norway RAPPORT NR: 1- 2010 ISBN 82-8116-016-0 2 CONTENT 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................2 2. NEAR SURFACE BOUNDARY LAYER AND TURBULENCE MIXING .............3 2.1. Structure of Upper Ocean Turbulence........................................................................................ 5 2.2. Governing Equations......................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1. Turbulent Kinetic Energy and Temperature Variance .................................................................. 6 2.2.2. Relevant Length Scales..................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.3. Relevant non-dimensional numbers...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2. Turbulence and the Planetary Boundary Layer
    Chapter 2. Turbulence and the Planetary Boundary Layer In the chapter we will first have a qualitative overview of the PBL then learn the concept of Reynolds averaging and derive the Reynolds averaged equations. Making use of the equations, we will discuss several applications of the boundary layer theories, including the development of mixed layer as a pre-conditioner of server convection, the development of Ekman spiral wind profile and the Ekman pumping effect, low-level jet and dryline phenomena. The emphasis is on the applications. What is turbulence, really? Typically a flow is said to be turbulent when it exhibits highly irregular or chaotic, quasi-random motion spanning a continuous spectrum of time and space scales. The definition of turbulence can be, however, application dependent. E.g., cumulus convection can be organized at the relatively small scales, but may appear turbulent in the context of global circulations. Main references: Stull, R. B., 1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic, 666 pp. Chapter 5 of Holton, J. R., 1992: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. Academic Press, New York, 511 pp. 2.1. Planetary boundary layer and its structure The planetary boundary layer (PBL) is defined as the part of the atmosphere that is strongly influenced directly by the presence of the surface of the earth, and responds to surface forcings with a timescale of about an hour or less. 1 PBL is special because: • we live in it • it is where and how most of the solar heating gets into the atmosphere • it is complicated due to the processes of the ground (boundary) • boundary layer is very turbulent • others … (read Stull handout).
    [Show full text]