DOCSLIB.ORG

Eight Bank Case Studies on Bank Restructuring

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eight Bank Case Studies on Bank Restructuring CFS W ORKING P APER No. 2013/04 The Capital Structure of Banks and Practice of Bank Restructuring Hans-Joachim Dübel Center for Financial Studies Tel: +49 69 798-30050 Goethe University House of Finance Fax: +49 69 798-30077 Grüneburgplatz 1 60323 Frankfurt am Main www.ifk-cfs.de [email protected] CFS Working Paper Series The Center for Financial Studies, located in Goethe University’s House of Finance in Frankfurt, is an independent non-profit research center, funded by the non-profit- making organisation Gesellschaft für Kapitalmarktforschung e.V. (GfK). The CFS is financed by donations and by contributions of the GfK members, as well as by national and international research grants. The GfK members comprise major players in Ger- many’s financial industry. Established in 1967 and closely affiliated with the University of Frankfurt, it provides a strong link between the financial community and academia. CFS is also a contributor to policy debates and policy analyses, building upon relevant findings in its research areas. The CFS Working Paper Series presents the result of scientific research on selected topics in the field of money, banking and finance. The authors were either participants in the Center´s Research Fellow Program or members of one of the Center´s Research Projects. If you would like to know more about the Center for Financial Studies, please let us know of your interest. Prof. Michalis Haliassos, Ph.D. Prof. Dr. Jan Pieter Krahnen Prof. Dr. Uwe Walz Center for Financial Studies Tel: +49 69 798-30050 Goethe University House of Finance Fax: +49 69 798-30077 Grüneburgplatz 1 60323 Frankfurt am Main www.ifk-cfs.de [email protected] The Capital Structure of Banks and Practice of Bank Restructuring Eight Case Studies on Current Bank Restructurings in Europe Final Report Study commissioned by Center for Financial Studies University of Frankfurt By Hans-Joachim Dübel Finpolconsult, Berlin Assistance Malte Daniels Ioana Bejan Berlin October 8, 2013 List of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. iv Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Focus and Purpose ................................................................................................................................... 1 Case Selection .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology and Data .............................................................................................................................. 2 Structure .................................................................................................................................................... 3 Bank Case Studies .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Anglo Irish Bank ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Hypo Real Estate .................................................................................................................................... 10 Amagerbanken ........................................................................................................................................ 18 Bankia ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 Dexia ....................................................................................................................................................... 31 SNS Reaal Group ................................................................................................................................... 37 Cyprus Popular Bank (‘Laiki’) .................................................................................................................. 43 Alpha Bank .............................................................................................................................................. 52 Synopsis of Empirical Findings ............................................................................................................................. 59 Participation of the Capital Structure in Financing the Capital Gap ........................................................ 59 Expected Loss From Participation .......................................................................................................... 61 Expected Loss Distribution - Government vs. the Capital Structure/Private Sector ............................... 62 Synopsis of Policy Lessons ................................................................................................................................... 63 Macro level (regulatory forbearance and creditor participation policy) ................................................... 63 Micro level (bank restructuring policy and investor relations) ................................................................. 64 Annex .................................................................................................................................................................. 68 Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... 68 Glossary .................................................................................................................................................. 69 Literature ................................................................................................................................................. 70 Additional Data and Material ................................................................................................................... 72 Finpolconsult – Bank Capital Structure and Restructuring Europe ii Acknowledgements The author thanks Jan Pieter Krahnen and Tobias Tröger of the Center for Financial Studies at the Uni- versity of Frankfurt for providing financing for this research project. He is indebted to numerous contacts in policy institutions, banking and capital markets institutions and the research community that contributed to the study through additional data, review and discussion. Note This study is a companion piece to “Creditor Participation in Banking Crisis in the Eurozone – A Corner Turned?”, June 28, 2013. Both studies were written jointly under a co-finance scheme. This study therefore contains occasionally verbatim passages from the earlier published study. Finpolconsult – Bank Capital Structure and Restructuring Europe iii Executive Summary This study presents an empirical analysis of capital and liability management in eight cases of bank re- structurings and resolutions from eight different European countries. It can be read as a companion piece to an earlier study by the author covering the specific bank restructuring programs of Greece, Spain and Cyprus during 2012/13. 1 The study portrays for each case the timelines between the initial credit event and the (last) restructuring. It proceeds to discuss the capital and liability management activity before restructuring and the restructur- ing itself, launches an attempt to calibrate the extent of creditor participation as well as expected loss by government, and engages in a counterfactual discussion of what could have been a least cost restructur- ing approach. Four of the eight cases are resolutions, i.e. the original bank is unwound (Anglo Irish Bank, Amagerbank- en, Dexia, Laiki), while the four other banks have de-facto or de-jure become nationalized and are await- ing re-privatization after the restructuring (Deutsche Pfandbriefbank/Hypo Real Estate, Bankia, SNS Re- aal, Alpha Bank). The case selection follows considerations of their model character for the European bank restructuring and resolution policy discussion while straddling both the U.S. (2007 - 2010) and the European (2010 - ) legs of the financial crisis, which each saw very different policy responses. The drivers of creditor participation identified in this study are: • delay between first risk realization and comprehensive restructuring - a negative driver. Restructuring delay provides room for evasion by creditors whose interests are aligned with those of bank managers trying to preserve future issuance options for near-insolvent banks against the odds. Redemptions, lia- bility management exercises and early calls have in this way reduced the bail-inable capital over time in a number of cases substantially (Anglo Irish Bank in 2009, Bankia, Dexia, Laiki, Alpha Bank). This is particularly true for hybrid capital and subordinated debt first in line to take losses. Also, restructuring delay favors creditor rotation, which has maneuvered retail customers (Bankia, SNS Reaal, Laiki) and government (universal) into riskier positions of the capital structure. • depth of participation imposed on the capital structure both before and during the restructuring - a posi- tive driver. Depth is associated with the legal options available to supersede liability instrument con- tracts outside insolvency, e.g. a conducive bank restructuring and resolution law (existed for the cases of Amagerbanken, Bankia, SNS Reaal,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Independent Due Diligence of the Banking System of Cyprus
    PIMCO Europe Ltd 11 Baker Street London W1U 3AH England Tel: +44 20 3640 1000 Independent Due Diligence of the Banking System of Cyprus March 2013 Legal Disclaimer and Limiting Conditions This report sets forth information contemplated by the engagement of PIMCO Europe Ltd (together with its affiliates, “PIMCO”) by the Steering Committee (as defined herein) and is prepared in the form contemplated by the agreement between PIMCO Europe Ltd and the Central Bank of Cyprus (the “Agreement”). This report is intended to be read and used as a whole and not in parts. Separation or alteration of any section or page from the main body of this report is expressly forbidden. This report has been prepared exclusively for the Steering Committee. There are no third party beneficiaries with respect to this report, and PIMCO expressly disclaims any liability whatsoever (whether in contract, tort or otherwise) to any third party. PIMCO makes no representation or warranty (express or implied) to any third party in relation to this report. A decision by the Steering Committee to release this report to the public shall not constitute any permission, waiver or consent from PIMCO for any third party to rely on this report. Access to this report and its use by any third party implies acceptance by the third party of the terms and conditions contained in this section and other parts of this report. This report is, in all cases, subject to the limitations and other terms and conditions set forth herein and in the Agreement, in particular exclusions of liability. This report has been produced by using and in reliance on information furnished by third parties, including the Central Bank of Cyprus and the Participating Institutions to which this report relates.
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes a Good ʽbad Bankʼ? the Irish, Spanish and German Experience
    6 ISSN 2443-8022 (online) What Makes a Good ‘Bad Bank’? The Irish, Spanish and German Experience Stephanie Medina Cas, Irena Peresa DISCUSSION PAPER 036 | SEPTEMBER 2016 EUROPEAN ECONOMY Economic and EUROPEAN Financial Affairs ECONOMY European Economy Discussion Papers are written by the staff of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, or by experts working in association with them, to inform discussion on economic policy and to stimulate debate. The views expressed in this document are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official views of the European Commission, the IMF, its Executive Board, or IMF management. Authorised for publication by Carlos Martinez Mongay, Director for Economies of the Member States II. LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on its behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained in this publication, or for any errors which, despite careful preparation and checking, may appear. This paper exists in English only and can be downloaded from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on http://europa.eu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016 KC-BD-16-036-EN-N (online) KC-BD-16-036-EN-C (print) ISBN 978-92-79-54444-6 (online) ISBN 978-92-79-54445-3 (print) doi:10.2765/848761 (online) doi:10.2765/850297 (print) © European Union, 2016 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Economy Note No. 13 “Did the ECB Cause a Run on Irish Banks
    Irish Economy Note No. 13 “Did the ECB Cause a Run on Irish Banks? Evidence from Disaggregated Data” Gary O’Callaghan Dubrovnik International University February 2011 www.irisheconomy.ie/Notes/IrishEconomyNote13.pdf Did the ECB Cause a Run on Irish Banks? Evidence from the Disaggregated Data. Gary O’Callaghan Dubrovnik International University February 2011 The paper closely examines events leading up to the Irish crisis of November 2010. It traces the effects of these events on both the onshore banking sector and on an offshore sector that is almost as large but is very different in terms of structure and commitment. Both sectors benefit from liquidity support by the European Central Bank (ECB) but the offshore sector does not benefit from a Government guarantee on deposits and securities and no bank in this category would expect to be recapitalised by the Irish Government in the event of its insolvency. Therefore, by examining the effects of certain events on deposits in each sector, one can distinguish between a crisis of confidence in monetary support (that would apply to both sectors) and an erosion of credibility in fiscal policy (that would apply to domestic banks only). The paper suggests that a systemic run on Irish banks was the proximate cause of the November crisis (even if a financing package might have been needed anyway) and that it probably resulted from public musings by ECB Council members on the need to curtail liquidity support to banks. An ECB commitment in May to support government bonds had undermined its ability to reign in monetary policy and left it searching for an exit.
    [Show full text]
  • O-SII Notification
    Notification template for Article 131 CRD – Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) Please send this template to • [email protected] when notifying the ESRB; • [email protected] when notifying the ECB; • [email protected] when notifying the EBA. Emailing this template to the above-mentioned addresses constitutes an official notification, no further official letter is required. In order to facilitate the work of the notified authorities, please send the notification template in a format that allows electronically copying the information. 1. Notifying national authority 1.1 Name of the notifying National Committee for Macroprudential Oversight authority 2. Description of the measure Based on data available as of 31 March 2017, 9 credit institutions Romanian legal entities obtained a score higher than the threshold set for automatic designation of systemically important institutions (275 basis points). The re-evaluation based on June 2017 available data generated the same results. The name and LEI code of the systemically important institutions identified in Romania are provided below. Banca Comercială Română S.A. – LEI code 549300ORLU6LN5YD8X90 BRD - Groupe Societe Generale S.A. – LEI code 5493008QRHH0XCLJ4238 2.1 Concerned institution UniCredit Bank S.A. – LEI code 5493003BDYD5VPGUQS04 or group of institutions Raiffeisen Bank S.A. – LEI code 549300RFKNCOX56F8591 Banca Transilvania S.A. – LEI code 549300RG3H390KEL8896 Alpha Bank România S.A. – LEI code 529900TKT32Z5LP7XF90 CEC Bank S.A. – LEI code 2138008AVF4W7FMW8W87 Bancpost S.A. – LEI code 549300GM6AMB2XDWNC96 Garanti Bank S.A. – LEI code 549300UZRCTIM0HREY46 An O-SII buffer applicable in 2018 is set for the systemically important institutions which are Romanian legal entities.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Paper Series
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES No. 2791 GREEK BANKING AT THE DAWN OF THE NEW MILLENNIUM Barry Eichengreen and Heather D Gibson INTERNATIONAL MACROECONOMICS ZZZFHSURUJ Available online at: www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP2791.asp www.ssrn.com/xxx/xxx/xxx ISSN 0265-8003 GREEK BANKING AT THE DAWN OF THE NEW MILLENNIUM Barry Eichengreen, University of California Berkeley and CEPR Heather D Gibson, Bank of Greece Discussion Paper No. 2791 May 2001 Centre for Economic Policy Research 90–98 Goswell Rd, London EC1V 7RR, UK Tel: (44 20) 7878 2900, Fax: (44 20) 7878 2999 Email: [email protected], Website: www.cepr.org This Discussion Paper is issued under the auspices of the Centre’s research programme in International Macroeconomics. Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of the Centre for Economic Policy Research. Research disseminated by CEPR may include views on policy, but the Centre itself takes no institutional policy positions. The Centre for Economic Policy Research was established in 1983 as a private educational charity, to promote independent analysis and public discussion of open economies and the relations among them. It is pluralist and non-partisan, bringing economic research to bear on the analysis of medium- and long-run policy questions. Institutional (core) finance for the Centre has been provided through major grants from the Economic and Social Research Council, under which an ESRC Resource Centre operates within CEPR; the Esmée Fairbairn Charitable Trust; and the Bank of England. These organizations do not give prior review to the Centre’s publications, nor do they necessarily endorse the views expressed therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Resolution Concepts, Trade-Offs, and Changes in Practices
    Phoebe White and Tanju Yorulmazer Bank Resolution Concepts, Trade-offs, and Changes in Practices • As the 2007-08 financial crisis demonstrated, 1. Introduction the failure or near-failure of banks entails heavy costs for customers, the financial During the recent crisis, some of the world’s largest and sector, and the overall economy. most prominent financial institutions failed or nearly failed, requiring intervention and assistance from regulators. Measures • Methods used to resolve failing banks range included extended access to lender-of-last-resort facilities, debt from private-sector solutions such as mergers guarantees, and injection of capital to mitigate the distress.1 and acquisitions to recapitalization through Chart 1 shows some of the largest financial institutions the use of public funds. that failed and/or received government support during the recent crisis. As we can see, these institutions were • The feasibility and cost of these methods large and systemically important. For example, for a brief will depend on whether the bank failure is period in 2009, Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) was the idiosyncratic or part of a systemic crisis, and largest company by both assets and liabilities in the world. on factors such as the size, complexity, and Table 1 summarizes the interventions and resolutions of interconnectedness of the institution in distress. major financial institutions that experienced difficulties during the recent crisis. The chart and the table indicate • This study proposes a simple analytical the extraordinary levels of distress throughout the system framework—useful to firms and regulators and the unprecedented range of actions taken by resolution alike—for assessing these issues and determining the optimal resolution policy 1 For a discussion of the disruptions and the policy responses during the in the case of particular bank failures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Competition Council Has Authorized the Merger Between ALPHA BANK AE and EFG EFG EUROBANK ERGASIAS SA
    The Competition Council has authorized the merger between ALPHA BANK AE and EFG EFG EUROBANK ERGASIAS SA The Competition Council has authorized the economic concentration consisting in merger by absorbtion of EFG Eurobank Ergasias SA by Alpha Bank AE. The analysis of the competition authority found that the notified economic concentration does not raise significant obstacles to effective competition on the Romanian market, respectively does not lead to the creation or strengthening of a dominant position of the merged company to have as effect restriction, prevention or significant distortion of competition on the Romanian market or on a part of it. Since both Alpha Bank AE and EFG Eurobank Ergasias SA hold in Greece more than 2/3 of turnover at European level, there is no obligation this merger to be notified to the European Commission. Community legislation provides that where each of the companies involved achieves more than 2/3 of total turnover in one of member states, the operation is analyzed by the competition authority of respective state as well as by each of the states where the involved parties activate. The merged company shall be called Alpha Eurobank SA. Alpha Bank AE is a company that is part of Alpha group, one of the most important banking and financial services groups in Greece. Alpha Group offers a wide range of services including retail banking, corporate banking, asset management, private sector banking, distribution of insurance products, investment banking, leasing, factoring, management of brokerage services and of estate assets, and brokerage services. In Romania, Alpha group holds control over Alpha Bank Romania S.A., Alpha Leasing Romania IFN S.A., SSIF Alpha Finance Romania S.A., Alpha Insurance Brokers S.R.L., Alpha Astika Akinita Romania S.R.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2015
    ANNUAL REPORT 2015 www.eurobank.gr/annualreport2015_en The people of Eurobank stand by our signature. We commit to give… priority to you. CONTENTS Historical Milestones 6 Group Financial Figures 8 Letter to Shareholders 10 Share Capital Increase – Capital Adequacy 22 Financial Review 24 Strategic Transformation Programme 26 Corporate Governance 28 Risk Management 40 Piority to Our Customers 54 Retail Banking 54 Group Corporate & Investment Banking 64 Troubled Assets Management 72 Wealth Management 74 International Capital Markets & Treasury 78 Equities Brokerage 80 Insurance Operations 81 Other Activities 82 International Presence 84 Romania 85 Bulgaria 85 Serbia 87 Cyprus 88 Luxembourg 88 Ukraine 89 Corporate Responsibility 92 Priority to our People 94 Priority to Society 102 Priority to Innovation and Youth Entrepreneurship 110 Priority to Communicating with Customers 116 Relations with Suppliers 119 Priority to the Environment and Sustainable Development 120 Management Systems and Certifications 126 Memberships in Associations & Organisations 128 Awards 2015 130 Appendix 132 Financial Data for the Year ANNUAL REPORT 2015 | HISTORICAL MILESTONES HISTORICAL MILESTONES 2007 2013 1997 2015 Launch of greenfield 2000 2003 2004 operation in Cyprus. Eurobank is recapitalised 1990 Eurobank-Interbank Acquisition of 70% by the HFSF Acquisition of the operations of merger. of Tekfenbank Turkey, Alpha Bank’s Bulgarian Branch by EFG Eurobank – Acquisition of a 90.8% Acquisition which is renamed to The Group grows Eurobank’s subsidiary in Bulgaria, Acquisition of the Ergobank merger; stake in Postbanka of Intertrust Eurobank Tekfen. further, through the Eurobank Bulgaria AD (“Postbank”). Establishment branch network of the new bank is AD Serbia, which M.F.M.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Valuations for Lenders – Our Specialist Area of Business
    Valuations for Lenders – Our Specialist Area of Business William Newsom –Head of Valuation, Savills Commercial Limited Presentation • Savills’Corporate Profile Contents • Commercial Valuation Department –Areas of Expertise • Why instruct Savills? Savills’ • July 1988 –Savills plc listed on the London Corporate Profile Stock Exchange • 2006 –Ranked number 1 (see over) • 98 offices in UK; 25 in Europe and 36 in Far East and Australasia, etc. • Savills commercial UK turnover in 2006 was £189.1M (56.4% of total UK company turnover) No. 1 by turnover July 2006 No. 1 by turnover June 2006 No. 1 employer May 2006 Savills Commercial Limited -UK Fee Income by Product Area 2006 Savills’accolades: Investment •Voted Investment Agent of the Year 33% 2005 (and 2003) Property 47% •Voted Residential Development Agent Management of the Year 2004 Agency •Winners of Industrial and Retail Agency Teams of the Year 2007 - Professional 7% North West Property Awards Services (inc. 13% Valuation) •Nominated as Professional Agency (Valuation) of the Year 2006 •Nominated as Scottish Professional Agency (Valuation) of the Year 2006 (winner to be announced in May 2007) Commercial • Total staff in London of 38 Valuation • Total billing in 2005 of £10.5M Department • Plus commercial valuersin Edinburgh and Manchester, soon to open in Birmingham • 11 Directors • Core Directors average 15+ years service each • 18 new staff in London over 2005/2006 • We specialisein larger commercial property (above £5.0M). Often above £100M • Minimum fee £4,000 per instruction Commercial
    [Show full text]
  • In Brief/简介- A&L Goodbody's China Focus
    In Brief/简介 A&L Goodbody’s China Focus A&L Goodbody聚焦中国 A&L Goodbody is internationally recognised as one of Ireland’s leading law firms. We are continually instructed on the most significant, high value and complex legal work in Ireland. Our culture is to instinctively collaborate for the success of our clients. This enables us to deliver the highest quality solutions for our clients, in ways others may not think of. A&L Goodbody是国际公认的爱尔兰顶级律师事务所之一，多年来在爱尔兰一直致力于最重要、高价值及复杂的法律工作。我 们的理念即是为了客户的成功进行合作。这使得我们能够向客户提供无以伦比的高质量解决方案。 Established more than 100 years ago, we are an “all-island” law firm with offices in Dublin and Belfast. We also have offices in London, New York and Palo Alto and a particular focus on China. 本所创立于100年以前, 是一家在都柏林和贝尔法斯特设立办公室并覆盖全岛的律师事务所。我们在伦敦、纽约和帕罗奥多市也 设有办公室, 并且尤其关于中国。 The Firm provides a full range of market-leading business legal services through our corporate, banking and financial services, corporate tax, litigation and dispute resolution, commercial property, employment, pensions and benefits departments. The Firm offers the most extensive range of specialist services available in Ireland through our 30 Specialist Practice Groups. 我们提供市场领先的全方位法律服务，下设公司部、银行和融资服务部、公司税法部、诉讼和争议解决部、商业房地产部、劳动 部、退休金及福利部等多个部门。我们拥有 30 多个专业团队，向客户提供最广泛的爱尔兰法律专业服务。 A&L Goodbody is one of Ireland’s largest and most successful law firms with an extensive and top class client list, representing hundreds of internationally know names and global blue chip corporations across all industry sectors including General Electric, Pfizer, Genzyme, Ranbaxy, Citi Group, Barclays, RBS, JP Morgan, CSFB, UBS, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, Northern Trust, Apple, Microsoft, IBM, Intel, Scientific Games, Kraft, Nestle, Yoplait, Tesco, Heineken, Pernod Ricard, Campari, Anglo American Corporation, Airbus, Aviva, Zurich, XL, Munich Re, KPMG and Ernst&Young, many of whom have operations in China as well as Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Bad Bank Resolutions and Bank Lending by Michael Brei, Leonardo Gambacorta, Marcella Lucchetta and Bruno Maria Parigi
    BIS Working Papers No 837 Bad bank resolutions and bank lending by Michael Brei, Leonardo Gambacorta, Marcella Lucchetta and Bruno Maria Parigi Monetary and Economic Department January 2020 JEL classification: E44, G01, G21 Keywords: bad banks, resolutions, lending, non-performing loans, rescue packages, recapitalisations BIS Working Papers are written by members of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements, and from time to time by other economists, and are published by the Bank. The papers are on subjects of topical interest and are technical in character. The views expressed in them are those of their authors and not necessarily the views of the BIS. This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). © Bank for International Settlements 2020. All rights reserved. Brief excerpts may be reproduced or translated provided the source is stated. ISSN 1020-0959 (print) ISSN 1682-7678 (online) Bad bank resolutions and bank lending Michael Brei∗, Leonardo Gambacorta♦, Marcella Lucchetta♠ and Bruno Maria Parigi♣ Abstract The paper investigates whether impaired asset segregation tools, otherwise known as bad banks, and recapitalisation lead to a recovery in the originating banks’ lending and a reduction in non-performing loans (NPLs). Results are based on a novel data set covering 135 banks from 15 European banking systems over the period 2000–16. The main finding is that bad bank segregations are effective in cleaning up balance sheets and promoting bank lending only if they combine recapitalisation with asset segregation. Used in isolation, neither tool will suffice to spur lending and reduce future NPLs. Exploiting the heterogeneity in asset segregation events, we find that asset segregation is more effective when: (i) asset purchases are funded privately; (ii) smaller shares of the originating bank’s assets are segregated; and (iii) asset segregation occurs in countries with more efficient legal systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Commission on the Future of the Cyprus Banking Sector
    Independent Commission on the Future of the Cyprus Banking Sector INTERIM REPORT June 2013 0 Independent Commission on the future of the Cyprus Banking Sector Interim report | 1 | Independent Commission on the future of the Cyprus Banking Sector Interim report Contents Executive summary………………………………………… 3 Acknowledgements………………………………………. 14 The Commission…………………………………………… 15 This report…………………………………………………… 16 Foreword……………………………………………………... 17 PART 1: THE RECENT PAST 1. Setting the scene………………………………………. 19 2. The Memorandum of Understanding…………… 31 PART 2: THE BANKS 3. Reforming the banking sector…………………….. 33 4. Cyprus’ international financial centre…………… 40 5. Banking competition and service quality………. 46 6. Corporate governance……………………………….. 51 PART 3: FINANCIAL STABILITY 7. The safety and soundness of banks………….... 57 8. National policy…………………………………………. 58 9. The structure of financial supervision………….. 59 10. The Central Bank of Cyprus…………………….. 61 11. Macro-prudential oversight..…………………….. 67 12. Prudential supervision and regulation……….. 71 13. Consumer protection……………………………….. 84 14. What next?................................................ 87 15. Cost/benefit analysis.………………………………. 89 16. Summary of recommendations…………………. 90 ANNEXES AND APPENDICES People and institutions interviewed………..………. 95 Appendix: Revised Terms of Reference…….…….. 96 Bibliography………………………………………………….. 98 | 1 | Independent Commission on the future of the Cyprus Banking Sector Interim report Charts and tables Charts 1. Total assets of credit institutions as % of GDP………………… 19 2. Financial intermediation: share of banks and markets…………. 19 3. Cyprus banking sector: Share of total assets………………………. 20 4. Growth of domestic credit………………………………………………… 21 5. Total resident loans as % of GDP……………………………………… 21 6. Commercial banks’ foreign lending €bn……………………………... 22 7. Deposits in locally active banks €bn………………………………….. 23 8. Cypriot banks’ funding needs €bn…………………………………….. 24 9. Interest rates on loans to non-financial corporations %........
    [Show full text]