Robert's Rules of Order

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Robert’s Rules of Order Robert’s Rule of Order provides common rules and procedures for deliberation and debate in order to place the whole membership on the same footing and speaking the same language. Form of Popular Motions When you You say… What does it mean? want to make a motion to… Point of Order Point of Order, To interjection during a meeting by a member, who does not have Speaker, (question) the floor, to call the attention of the chair to an alleged violation or breach of the assembly's or meeting's rules of order. Amend the I move to amend To formally change a bill by either inserting or striking out clauses; bill the motion by… once passed, it is now considered an official part to the whole bill. Table I move to table… To set aside a motion temporarily for further consideration. If an amendment is proposed, it will have to be tabled in order for legislation that do not need amendments to be passed more quickly. Un-table I move to un-table… To bring a tabled motion back to the floor, a member moves to take such motion from the table, and thus, allow for a move to make an amendment to the bill. Yield the floor I yield the floor to... A member who has the floor may yield the floor to another member; in so doing the former surrenders his right to continue speaking at that time. This will happen every time a majority leader allows a member from his/her party to speak. Common Terms Used in Formal Meetings: Call to order: a formal declaration of either the beginning of the meeting or a reminder to follow parliamentary procedure. Carry the Motion: to pass, approve or adopt a motion. Convene: To call the meeting to order. Has the Floor: When a member has been recognized by the chair, he has the floor. He should only in rare instances be interrupted; he may yield the floor (see below) to another if he so desires. Main Motion: Brings new business (the next item on the agenda) before the assembly Out of Order: Discussions, motions or interjections which are contrary to parliamentary procedure, fact, recognition, administrative procedure, or good taste. Either the Speaker can directly call a member out of order, or a member can ask a point of order for the Speaker to decide if someone is out of order. Adapted from: http://www.robertsrules.org and http://www.fnnc.org/robertsrules.html .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History
Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History Updated February 1, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45087 Resolutions to Censure the President: Procedure and History Summary Censure is a reprimand adopted by one or both chambers of Congress against a Member of Congress, President, federal judge, or other government official. While Member censure is a disciplinary measure that is sanctioned by the Constitution (Article 1, Section 5), non-Member censure is not. Rather, it is a formal expression or “sense of” one or both houses of Congress. Censure resolutions targeting non-Members have utilized a range of statements to highlight conduct deemed by the resolutions’ sponsors to be inappropriate or unauthorized. Before the Nixon Administration, such resolutions included variations of the words or phrases unconstitutional, usurpation, reproof, and abuse of power. Beginning in 1972, the most clearly “censorious” resolutions have contained the word censure in the text. Resolutions attempting to censure the President are usually simple resolutions. These resolutions are not privileged for consideration in the House or Senate. They are, instead, considered under the regular parliamentary mechanisms used to process “sense of” legislation. Since 1800, Members of the House and Senate have introduced resolutions of censure against at least 12 sitting Presidents. Two additional Presidents received criticism via alternative means (a House committee report and an amendment to a resolution). The clearest instance of a successful presidential censure is Andrew Jackson. The Senate approved a resolution of censure in 1834. On three other occasions, critical resolutions were adopted, but their final language, as amended, obscured the original intention to censure the President.
[Show full text]
Commencement Speaker Committee
Governance & Policies Effective: October 1997 University Governance Committees Which Are Modified by the Faculty Senate COMMENCEMENT SPEAKER COMMITTEE Approved: updated, fall 2009 Faculty Senate Bylaws Committee Membership 1. The committee is composed of one representative from each of the following four academic units: Education, Humanities, Science/Math, and Social Sciences, and one member from the non-school faculty, all elected by Faculty Senate for overlapping two-year terms. No representative may serve more than two consecutive terms. 2. Two student representatives serve on the committee. One is the chairperson of the University Board Speakers Committee and one is selected by the Student Senate for a one-year term. 3. The vice president for university advancement, who shall also serve as convener of the committee, and the director of student activities shall be members of the committee. 4. The terms of office begin 1 October, and the committee shall meet at least one time per year, usually during the fall semester, but at other times at the call of the convener or a majority of the members of the committee. Functions 1. The committee shall generate a pool of potential commencement speakers for consideration by the University president. 2. The pool shall be broadly representative in terms of race, gender, and academic discipline, and may include other considerations in order to promote enhanced diversity. 3. The speakers for the spring and winter commencements shall be drawn from the pool generated each fall by the committee. In the event a speaker cannot be obtained from the pool, nothing in this policy shall prevent the University administration from obtaining a commencement speaker from other avenues.
[Show full text]
Committee Handbook New Mexico Legislature
COMMITTEE HANDBOOK for the NEW MEXICO LEGISLATURE New Mexico Legislative Council Service Santa Fe, New Mexico 2012 REVISION prepared by: The New Mexico Legislative Council Service 411 State Capitol Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 (505) 986-4600 www.nmlegis.gov 202.190198 PREFACE Someone once defined a committee as a collection of people who individually believe that something must be done and who collectively decide that nothing can be done. Whether or not this definition has merit, it is difficult to imagine the work of a legislative body being accomplished without reliance upon the committee system. Every session, American legislative bodies are faced with thousands of bills, resolutions and memorials upon which to act. Meaningful deliberation on each of these measures by the entire legislative body is not possible. Therefore, the job must be broken up and distributed among the "miniature legislatures" called standing or substantive committees. In New Mexico, where the constitution confines legislative action to a specified number of calendar days, the work of such committees assumes even greater importance. Because the role of committees is vital to the legislative process, it is necessary for their efficient operation that individual members of the senate and house and their staffs understand committee functioning and procedure, as well as their own roles on the committees. For this reason, the legislative council service published in 1963 the first Committee Handbook for New Mexico legislators. This publication is the sixth revision of that document. i The Committee Handbook is intended to be used as a guide and working tool for committee chairs, vice chairs, members and staff.
[Show full text]
Parliamentary Procedures at a Glance
Parliamentary Procedures at a Glance To Do This (1) You Say This: May You Must You Be Is the Motion Is the Motion What Vote is Interrupt the Seconded? Debatable? Amendable? Required? Speaker? Adjourn the meeting “I move that we May not interrupt (before all business is Must be seconded Not debatable Not amendable Majority vote required adjourn.” Speaker complete). “I move that we recess May not interrupt Recess the meeting Must be seconded Not debatable Amendable Majority vote required until ...” Speaker Complain about noise, room temperature, etc. “Point of Privilege” May interrupt Speaker No second needed Not debatable (2) Not amendable No vote required (3) Suspend further May not interrupt consideration of “I move we table it.” Must be seconded Not debatable Not amendable Majority vote required Speaker something End debate “I move the May not interrupt Must be seconded Debatable Amendable Two-thirds Postpone consideration “I move we postpone May not interrupt Two-thirds vote Must be seconded Debatable Amendable of something this matter until...” Speaker required Have something “I move we refer this May not interrupt Must be seconded Debatable Amendable Majority vote required studied further to a committee Speaker “I move that this May not interrupt Amend a motion motion be amended Must be seconded Debatable Amendable Majority vote required Speaker by...” Introduce business (a May not interrupt Majority vote “I move that...” Must be seconded Debatable Amendable primary motion) Speaker Required 1. These motions or points are listed in established order of precedence. When any one of them is pending, you may not introduce another that’s listed below it.
[Show full text]
Legislative Process Lpbooklet 2016 15Th Edition.Qxp Booklet00-01 12Th Edition 11/18/16 3:00 PM Page 1
LPBkltCvr_2016_15th edition-1.qxp_BkltCvr00-01 12th edition 11/18/16 2:49 PM Page 1 South Carolina’s Legislative Process LPBooklet_2016_15th edition.qxp_Booklet00-01 12th edition 11/18/16 3:00 PM Page 1 THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS LPBooklet_2016_15th edition.qxp_Booklet00-01 12th edition 11/18/16 3:00 PM Page 2 October 2016 15th Edition LPBooklet_2016_15th edition.qxp_Booklet00-01 12th edition 11/18/16 3:00 PM Page 3 THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS The contents of this pamphlet consist of South Carolina’s Legislative Process , pub - lished by Charles F. Reid, Clerk of the South Carolina House of Representatives. The material is reproduced with permission. LPBooklet_2016_15th edition.qxp_Booklet00-01 12th edition 11/18/16 3:00 PM Page 4 LPBooklet_2016_15th edition.qxp_Booklet00-01 12th edition 11/18/16 3:00 PM Page 5 South Carolina’s Legislative Process HISTORY o understand the legislative process, it is nec - Tessary to know a few facts about the lawmak - ing body. The South Carolina Legislature consists of two bodies—the Senate and the House of Rep - resentatives. There are 170 members—46 Sena - tors and 124 Representatives representing dis tricts based on population. When these two bodies are referred to collectively, the Senate and House are together called the General Assembly. To be eligible to be a Representative, a person must be at least 21 years old, and Senators must be at least 25 years old. Members of the House serve for two years; Senators serve for four years. The terms of office begin on the Monday following the General Election which is held in even num - bered years on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.
[Show full text]
Points of Order; Parliamentary Inquiries
Points of Order; Parliamentary Inquiries A. POINTS OF ORDER § 1. In General; Form § 2. Role of the Chair § 3. Reserving Points of Order § 4. Time to Raise Points of Order § 5. Ð Against Bills and Resolutions § 6. Ð Against Amendments § 7. Application to Particular Questions; Grounds § 8. Relation to Other Business § 9. Debate on Points of Order; Burden of Proof § 10. Waiver of Points of Order § 11. Withdrawal of Points of Order § 12. Appeals B. PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRIES § 13. In General; Recognition § 14. Subjects of Inquiry § 15. Timeliness of Inquiry § 16. As Related to Other Business Research References 5 Hinds §§ 6863±6975 8 Cannon §§ 3427±3458 Manual §§ 627, 637, 861b, 865 A. Points of Order § 1. In General; Form Generally A point of order is in effect an objection that the pending matter or proceeding is in violation of a rule of the House. (Grounds for point of order, see § 7, infra.) Any Member (or any Delegate) may make a point of order. 6 Cannon § 240. Although there have been rare instances in which the Speaker has insisted that the point of order be reduced to writing (5 633 § 1 HOUSE PRACTICE Hinds § 6865), the customary practice is for the Member to rise and address the Chair: MEMBER: Mr. Speaker (or Mr. Chairman), I make a point of order against the [amendment, section, paragraph]. CHAIR: The Chair will hear the gentleman. It is appropriate for the Chair to determine whether the point of order is being raised under a particular rule of the House. The objecting Member should identify the particular rule that is the basis for his point of order.
[Show full text]
The Legislative Process on the House Floor: an Introduction
The Legislative Process on the House Floor: An Introduction Updated May 20, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov 95-563 The Legislative Process on the House Floor: An Introduction Summary The daily order of business on the floor of the House of Representatives is governed by standing rules that make certain matters and actions privileged for consideration. On a day-to-day basis, however, the House can also decide to grant individual bills privileged access to the floor, using one of several parliamentary mechanisms. The standing rules of the House include several different parliamentary mechanisms that the body may use to act on bills and resolutions. Which of these will be employed in a given instance usually depends on the extent to which Members want to debate and amend the legislation. In general, all of the procedures of the House permit a majority of Members to work their will without excessive delay. The House considers most legislation by motions to suspend the rules, with limited debate and no floor amendments, with the support of at least two-thirds of the Members voting. Occasionally, the House will choose to consider a measure on the floor by the unanimous consent of Members. The Rules Committee is instrumental in recommending procedures for considering major bills and may propose restrictions on the floor amendments that Members can offer or bar them altogether. Many major bills are first considered in Committee of the Whole before being passed by a simple majority vote of the House. The Committee of the Whole is governed by more flexible procedures than the basic rules of the House, under which a majority can vote to pass a bill after only one hour of debate and with no floor amendments.
[Show full text]
December 7, 2016 the Honorable Paul Ryan Speaker, U.S. House H
December 7, 2016 The Honorable Paul Ryan The Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker, U.S. House Democratic Leader, U.S. House H-232 Capitol Building H-204 Capitol Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Re: Consequences of Repealing ACA Provisions or Ending Cost-Sharing Reduction Reimbursements Dear Speaker Ryan and Leader Pelosi: With plans for repeal of all or part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) reportedly being prioritized for action early in the 115th Congress, the American Academy of Actuaries’1 Health Practice Council urges you to consider the potential adverse consequences of repealing provisions of the ACA, such as the individual mandate and enrollee subsidies, without also enacting a replacement approach at the same time. Repealing major provisions of the ACA would raise immediate concerns that individual market enrollment would decline, causing the risk pools to deteriorate and premiums to become less affordable. Even if the effective date of a repeal is delayed, the threat of a deterioration of the risk pool could lead additional insurers to reconsider their participation in the individual market. Likewise, eliminating the reimbursements to insurers for cost-sharing reduction (CSR) subsidies could result in insurer losses and solvency challenges, leading insurers to further consider withdrawing from the market. In either case, significant market disruption could result, leading to millions of Americans losing their health insurance. Offering pre-existing condition protections requires incentives for enrollment A sustainable health insurance market depends on enrolling enough healthy people over which the costs of the less healthy people can be spread. To ensure viability when there is a guarantee that consumers with pre-existing conditions can obtain health insurance coverage at standard rates requires mechanisms to spread the cost of that guarantee over a broad population.
[Show full text]
House Speaker Tina Kotek Announces Committees Urgent Issues Will Get Dedicated Attention in New Committees
OFFICE OF THE HOUSE SPEAKER 900 Court St., N.E., Room H-269 Salem OR 97301 http://www.oregonlegislature.gov/kotek NEWS RELEASE December 31, 2020 Danny Moran, 503-986-1204 [email protected] House Speaker Tina Kotek Announces Committees Urgent issues will get dedicated attention in new committees SALEM – Oregon House Speaker Tina Kotek on Thursday announced House committees for the 2021 Legislative Session. In addition to the standard policy and budget committees, the Oregon House of Representatives will have new committees in the upcoming session to address timely issues, including wildfire recovery, redistricting, institutional reform of the Legislature, as well as subcommittees focusing on COVID-19 response, equitable policing and the return of a policy committee dedicated to early childhood issues. “Oregonians are facing crises that demand urgent action. The House is ready to lead on the issues that matter most in people’s lives right now. We also need to create the space to have a focused conversation about long-term, transformational changes to modernize the people’s legislature,” Speaker Kotek said. “I’m grateful for the diverse perspectives that my colleagues will bring as we all work together to help Oregonians navigate the big challenges that lie ahead.” Speaker Kotek communicated directly with every returning and new member of the Oregon House of Representatives before deciding on committee assignments, taking the time to weigh and discuss their priorities, interests and notable experience. She also consulted with both caucus leaders before finalizing the assignments. The House will convene on Monday, January 11 to swear in members.
[Show full text]
Common Parliamentary Procedure
Common Parliamentary Procedure 1. To obtain the floor, speaker should: 6. To consider an action, speaker should: a. wait until the previous speaker has finished a. state: “I move that we reconsider the vote on b. address the chair the motion to (state motion).” c. when recognized, state name and church The motion must be made by one who voted with the d. make statement prevailing side. The motion must be seconded, is debatably, and requires a majority vote. 2. To move or amend, speaker should: 7. To rescind an action, speaker should: a. state: “I move that we ______.” or “I move that a. state: “I move that we rescind the motion that we amend the motion by adding/striking/ (state motion).” inserting the words ______.” The motion must be seconded, is debatable, and requires b. wait until motion or amendment has been a two-thirds vote of members present, or majority of seconded and placed before delegation entire membership, unless previous notice has been c. speak to the item given to this particular motion to rescind. Only one amendment to a motion (primary amendment), and one amendment to the motion to amend (secondary 8. To substitute a motion, speaker should: amendment) are in order at one time. a. state: “I move, as a substitute motion, that we (state substitute).” 3. To stop debate, speaker should: This motion must be seconded, is debatably, and requires a. state: “I move the previous question.” a majority vote. If a substitute motion is passed, it simply The motion must be seconded, is not debatable, and becomes the motion before the Conference.
[Show full text]
Resolution for Censure James Madison University Faculty Senate May 6, 2021
Resolution for Censure James Madison University Faculty Senate May 6, 2021 Whereas one of the traditional duties of the Speaker of the Faculty Senate is to attend the quarterly meetings of the JMU Board of Visitors to report to its Academics and Student Life Committee on activities of the Faculty Senate and to update the Committee on issues of concern to the faculty, and Whereas the Faculty Senate places its trust in the Speaker to fairly represent its interests before the Board of Visitors and to reflect views that are held in common by a majority of the faculty, and Whereas at the April 15, 2021, meeting of the BOV Academics and Student Life Committee, Senate Speaker Val Larsen delivered a speech that misrepresented the views of the Faculty Senate, in particular, by making faulty assumptions about the reasons for abstentions on the freedom of speech resolution, and Whereas the result of the freedom of speech resolution was taken out of context, exploited rhetorically, and misinterpreted as signifying deep ideological divisions at JMU, and Whereas the Speaker’s oral presentation was discussed with neither the Senate Steering Committee nor the Provost prior to its delivery, and Whereas the delivery of the Speaker’s oral presentation constitutes a breach of trust of the Faculty Senate and its constituents, and Whereas the claims and ideology expressed in the Speaker’s oral presentation belong primarily to the Speaker and significantly misrepresent and distort the views and beliefs of the faculty senate as a collective, Now therefore be it Resolved that the Faculty Senate issues this Censure for the above- described actions of Speaker Larsen, and directs the Speaker at the next Board of Visitors meeting to read a statement retracting and clarifying the April 15 oral presentation.
[Show full text]
Robert's Rules of Order As Used by the General Tribal Council Voting
Robert’s Rules of Order As Used by the General Tribal Council Voting Majority Vote - used in most instances and requires a simple majority of the members voting, excluding those who choose to abstain. The abstentions are asked for to complete the record, not to include them in the count. Two-Thirds Vote - used to overturn a previous action as identified in the Ten Day Notice Policy. Requires two-thirds of those voting to take action, excluding those who choose to abstain. The total number of votes, divided by three, multiplied times two. Fragments are included in the ‘yes’ votes as that is where two-thirds of the vote lies. Note: an action of the membership to overturn a prior action taken at a meeting which was concluded by the Business Committee on behalf of the General Tribal Council, because no quorum was met, falls within the Ten Day Notice Policy requirements. Tie Votes - in the event of a tie, the Chairperson can vote. A tie is identified in Robert’s Rules of Order as an occasion where if the Chair casts a vote, a different outcome will result. The Constitution identifies that the Chair votes “only in the case of a tie.” This has been identified to limit the ability of the Chair to vote to break a tie vote. In the case of a two- thirds vote, where it would change the results of the vote. Point of Order A point of order arises when a member who has the floor is not talking about the subject matter on the agenda before the membership at that time in the meeting.
[Show full text]