The Madrid Protocol and the Absence of International Trademark Enforcement Mechanisms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Madrid Protocol and the Absence of International Trademark Enforcement Mechanisms NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 45 Number 3 Article 4 2020 Haute Couture's Paper Shield: The Madrid Protocol and the Absence of International Trademark Enforcement Mechanisms Zachary Shufro Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Zachary Shufro, Haute Couture's Paper Shield: The Madrid Protocol and the Absence of International Trademark Enforcement Mechanisms, 45 N.C. J. INT'L L. 645 (2020). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol45/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Haute Couture's Paper Shield: The Madrid Protocol and the Absence of International Trademark Enforcement Mechanisms Zachary Shufrot I. Introduction ............................................................... 646 II. Defining Trademarks in Context ............................... 649 A. Trademark Law's History.....................................651 B. Theories and Definitions.......................................652 1. Likelihood of Confusion ................................. 653 2 . D ilution ........................................................... 656 3. Trade D ress ..................................................... 658 III. International Trademark Framework.........................659 A. Early International Treaties .................................. 660 B. The New Intellectual Property Order....................663 IV. Fashion's Trademark Woes ....................................... 665 A. Trademark Squatting: The Hermbs Example ....... 666 B. Burberry's Challenges in China............................668 C. Chanel & the Double C.........................................669 D. Louis Vuitton & Generic Marks ........................... 671 E. Adidas & the Three Stripes...................................673 F. Louboutin: A Tale of Two Standards....................675 V . "Gray M arket" Sales..................................................677 A . A merican Law ...................................................... 679 1. The Lever Rule................................................680 2. Remedies Offered by U.S. Law ...................... 681 3. Unresolved Legal Issues ................................. 683 B. British & European Union Law ............................ 685 C. Chinese Law & the Laws of Other Jurisdictions..687 VI. Fakes & Confusion Risks .......................................... 687 t J.D. 2020, University of North Carolina School of Law; LL.M. Candidate 2021, New York University School of Law. Symposium Editor, North Carolina Journal of InternationalLaw. The Author thanks Alyssa Wright, Chandler Martin, Chelsea Pieroni, Professor Deborah Gerhardt, and Professor John Conley for their assistance, feedback, and revisions in the writing of this Article. The Author further thanks Julie Zerbo, whose legal reporting inspired the topic for this Article, and for whose extremely precise, thoughtful, and lightning-speed revisions the Author is extremely grateful. 646 N.C. J. INT'L L. [Vol. XLV A. Trade Dress Infringement Worldwide .................. 689 1. Loius Vuitton & Plada .................................... 690 B . "Legal" Fakes........................................................692 1. Supreme v. Supreme Italia..............................695 VII. Recommendations ..................................................... 698 A. Option I: Cooperation with the World Trade O rganization ........................................................ 700 B. Option II: Broad-Jurisdiction WIPO Dispute R esolution ........................................................... 704 C. Further Considerations..........................................705 V III. C onclusion ................................................................. 707 I. Introduction Burberry's Haymarket Check tartan. Louis Vuitton's Damier check. Louboutin's red soles. In the past decade, many prominent fashion houses have suffered losses in particularly high-profile trademark disputes that highlight their lack of protection under the current international trademark regime.' Courts in Asia, Europe, and North America have limited, modified, and revoked long- established and internationally-recognized trademarks, while providing little to no clarity for how these domestic judgments correspond to or modify international obligations.2 Trademark law occupies a precarious role internationally. As one of the three main species-or types-of intellectual property, trademark's existence is recognized worldwide and is enshrined in 1 See, e.g., Charlotte Alter, Burberry's Signature Design Copyright Reportedly Revoked in China, TIME (Nov. 27,2013), https://business.time.com/2013/11/27/burberrys- signature-design-copyright-revoked-in-chinal [https://perma.cc/VXD3-JZ2T]; Lauren D. Amendolara, Knocking Out Knock-Offs: Effectuating the Criminalization of Trafficking in Counterfeit Goods, 150 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L. J. 789, 809 (2015) [hereinafter Amendolara]; Julie Zerbo, Adidas Handed a Loss, as 3-Stripe Mark "Lacks Distinctiveness" in the European Union, Says Court, THE FASHION LAW (June 19, 2019), https://www.thefashionlaw.com/home/adidas-handed-a-loss-as-3-stripe-mark-lacks- distinctiveness-in-the-european-union-says-court [https://perma.cc/4JYZ-KN8R] [hereinafter Zerbo, Adidas Handeda Loss]; Julie Zerbo, Burberry Loses Trademark Rights in China, THE FASHION LAW (Nov. 25, 2013), https://www.thefashionlaw.com/home/burberry-loses-trademark-rights-in-china [https://perma.cc/B9JL-PLAW] [hereinafter Zerbo, Burberry Loses Trademark]. 2 See, e.g., Adidas Am., Inc. v. Payless Shoesource, Inc., 529 F. Supp. 2d 1215, 1222 (D. Or. 2007); Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market ex rel Nanu-Nana Handelsgesellschaft mbH fr Geschenkartikel & Co. KG, 2015 E.C.R. I-215, 11; Zerbo, Burberry Loses Trademark, supra note 1. 2020 HAUTE COUTRE'S PAPER SHIELD 647 treaties and conventions dating back to the nineteenth century.3 Common law precedent on trademarks arrived in the Americas before the arrival of the Mayflower, as "[h]istory has generally honored Southern v. How, decided in 1618, as the first reported trademark case in Anglo-American law."4 Its international recognition notwithstanding, trademark is the most vulnerable form of intellectual property in domestic and international spheres. Trademarks are registered nationally and internationally, but trademark holders can lose their exclusive right to use and police unauthorized uses through abandonment, failure to register or to re- register with national and international authorities, or through adverse legal proceedings. In international commerce, the rights of a trademark holder, how those rights are earned, and how they are enforced can vary significantly from country to country.5 Most countries rely on a "first use in commerce" trademark system,6 3 See, e.g., Sidney Diamond, The HistoricalDevelopment of Trademarks, 65 TMR 265,267 (1975) [hereinafter Diamond] (outlining the history of trademark protection from prehistory through the twentieth century). 4 Keith Stolte, How Early Did Anglo-American Trademark Law Begin? An Answer to Schechter's Conundrum, 8 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP., MEDIA & ENT. L. J. 505, 507 (1997). While Southern v. How, Popham's Reports 143 (1618), 79 Eng. Rep. 1243 (KB. 1907), is traditionally considered the earliest reported trademark case, research in the 1990s uncovered an even earlier trademark case-the 1584 Sandforth's Case. Id. at 505- 06. See also Sandforth's Case, Cory's Entries, British Library MS. Hargrave 123, fo. 168r (1584). 5 For an example of the degree to which rights might vary by jurisdiction, see generally Julie Zerbo, What's In a Name? Chanel's Global Quest to Protect the Name of a Color, TH FASHION LAW (May 30,2019), https://www.thefashionlaw.com/home/whats- in-a-name-chanels-global-quest-to-protect-the-name-of-a-color [https://perma.cc/U7SU- DF53]. In 2008, Chanel "filed an application for registration for the word 'Beige' in connection with its perfume of the same name." Id. This registration was approved, and added to the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") Principal Register. Id. However, the Israeli Registrar of Patents, Designs and Trademarks rejected an identical registration in 2019. Id. As commentator Julie Zerbo explains: The loss in Israel comes on the heels of Chanel's domestic struggle to register "Beige Label" for use on garments, handbags, jewelry, footwear, and eyewear almost two decades ago, only to be refused by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office on similar descriptiveness (and thus, failure to function as a trademark) grounds, despite previously being granted a registration for the same mark in connection with the same goods in France. Id. As this commentator's discussion of this rejection concludes, "The differences in a party's rights among various jurisdictions is in line with the territorial nature of trademark law." Id. 6 The United States is one such country. See 15 U.S.C. § 1051(d) (2018). 648 N.C. J. INT'L L. [Vol. XLV while others grant the exclusive rights to the first party to register his or her mark with the relevant trademark body.7 While there are several international treaties governing the registration of international trademarks, international
Recommended publications
  • Re-Importation (Parallel Trade) in Pharmaceuticals
    IPI CENTER FOR TECHNOLOGY FREEDOM Re-importation (Parallel Trade) in Pharmaceuticals By Jacob Arfwedson POLICY REPORT 182 JULY 2004 E S Supporters of parallel trade in pharmaceuticals argue that it lower prices, which is popular with consumers and cash-strapped governments. But in fact parallel trade reduces safety, since it represents an end-run around domestic inspection procedures. More importantly, re-importa- tion undermines intellectual property protection and hence incentives to invest in research and development of IP-based products; which will have ominous implications for consumers in the long-run. Re-importation (or parallel trade as it is known in Europe) occurs when products protected by patent, trademark or copyright are first placed into circulation on one market, then (re-) imported into a second market without the authorization of the original owner of the intellectual property rights (IPRs). Myriad products are re-imported, including automobiles, clothing, perfume and other consumer goods. This paper focuses on re-importation of pharmaceuticals, with a special focus on Europe. How- ever, the paper could not be timelier in the United States, where the House of Representatives voted in late July 2003 on re-importing Canadian prescription drugs into the US. This paper as- sesses whether parallel trade is generally valid, concluding that the net economic effects cannot be established empirically but that there may be significant long run harms to innovation if parallel trade grows indefinitely. IPRs are limited rights conferred by governments over certain products of the intellect (e.g. patents which protect inventions, copyrights which protect expressions of ideas and trademarks which protect brands).
    [Show full text]
  • State of Intellectual Property Protection and Enforcement in Armenia
    State of intellectual property protection and enforcement in Armenia 2020 Supported by Implemented by Table of contents Foreword ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................... 5 About Editors ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 7 Introduction............................................................................................................................................ 9 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1 Contribution of IP system and IP protection to economic growth and development .......................................................................................................................................... 13 1.1. Importance of efficient IP system for economic growth and development ............. 13 1.2. Importance of IP protection for national economies ............................................... 15 Chapter 2. Current state of the IP system in Armenia ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The First Sale Rule in North American and European Trademark Law
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 5-2012 Market Integration and (the Limits of) the First Sale Rule in North American and European Trademark Law Irene Calboli [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Irene Calboli, Market Integration and (the Limits of) the First Sale Rule in North American and European Trademark Law, 51 Santa Clara L. Rev. 1241 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/362 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MARKET INTEGRATION AND (THE LIMITS OF) THE FIRST SALE RULE IN NORTH AMERICAN AND EUROPEAN TRADEMARK LAW Irene Calboli* I. INTRODUCTION The relationship between exclusive trademark rights and the free movement of goods across international borders has historically represented one of the most heated topics of discussion in the international trademark debate.' In a previous work published a few years ago, I analyzed this topic in the context of European trademark law and the case law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ).2 In this Article I * Associate Professor of Law and Director, Intellectual Property and Technology Program, Marquette University Law School; Spring 2011 CIPLIT Visiting Professor of Law, DePaul University College of Law. I would like to thank Eric Goldman for the invitation to speak at the "Exhaustion and First Sale in Intellectual Property" conference held at Santa Clara University School of Law on November 5, 2010, and for his insightful suggestions during the research and writing of this Article.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Patents Exemption Right As A
    AGAINST THE PLAGUE: EXEMPTION OF PHARMACEUTICAL PATENT RIGHTS AS A BIOSECURITY STRATEGY Taiwo A. Oriola* I. INTRODUCTION Acts of terrorism involve threats to use or use of weapons of mass destruction to kill, maim, or destroy property by individuals, groups, or states1 mainly on political grounds, and for maximum political effects.2 Terror attacks are characterized by stealth, indiscriminate violence, and destruction meant to heighten people’s fears and concerns for their lives and property.3 As terrorism has increased, so have the number of counterterrorism strategies by governments around the world.4 However, terrorism is as old as mankind.5 * Cardiff Law School, and the ESRC Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability, & Society, University of Cardiff, United Kingdom. 1. An early example of a state-sponsored terrorist was the Roman emperor Nero, who ruled by fear, slaughtered many members of the nobility, and has been blamed for the burning of Rome. CINDY C. COMBS & MARTIN SLANN, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF TERRORISM 201 (2002). Dysfunctional or anarchistic individuals or groups acting alone or in concert can perpetrate terrorist attacks. See Jonathan Glover, State Terrorism, in VIOLENCE, TERRORISM, AND JUSTICE 256, 257-60 (Raymond G. Frey & Christopher W. Morris eds., 1991) (contrasting historical state and independent terrorists, highlighting essential features of state-sponsored terrorism, and explaining why states commit acts of terrorism). 2. Political motivation has been described as “a necessary component to a definition of terrorism.” COMBS & SLANN, supra note 1, at 211. For examples of statutory definitions of terrorism, see Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001, Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods I N Molecular Biology ™
    M ETHODS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY™ Series Editor John M. Walker School of Life Sciences University of Hertfordshire Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/7651 Host-Fungus Interactions Methods and Protocols Edited by Alexandra C. Brand School of Medical Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK Donna M. MacCallum School of Medical Sciences, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK Editors Alexandra C. Brand, Ph.D. Donna M. MacCallum, Ph.D. School of Medical Sciences School of Medical Sciences Institute of Medical Sciences Institute of Medical Sciences University of Aberdeen University of Aberdeen Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK [email protected] [email protected] ISSN 1064-3745 e-ISSN 1940-6029 ISBN 978-1-61779-538-1 e-ISBN 978-1-61779-539-8 DOI 10.1007/978-1-61779-539-8 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2011945440 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Humana Press, c/o Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Brief
    Court of Justice of the European Union Cour de Justice de l’Union Européenne L – 2925 Luxembourg RE: Joint Cases C-253/20 Novartis AG v. Impexeco NV and C-254/20 Novartis AG v. PI Pharma NV September 28, 2020 Amicus Submission – International Trademark Association The International Trademark Association (“INTA”) has prepared this Submission in relation to the joint cases C-253/20 “Impexeco” Novartis AG v. Impexeco NV, and C-254/20 “PI Pharma”, Novartis AG v. PI Pharma NV, pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which request preliminary rulings under article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) referred by the Brussels Court of Appeal. A. INTA’s interest in the cases INTA is not a party in the cases and acknowledges that the CJEU does not have a procedure for accepting an amicus curiae intervention stricto sensu. INTA, however, believes that the joint cases are significant to the development of trademark law and presents itself as an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) in these matters, as it has done in the past (see Annex A listing previous amicus interventions by INTA before European courts). INTA hopes that this submission may be of assistance to the Court. B. About INTA INTA is a global association of brand owners and professionals dedicated to supporting trademarks and related intellectual property (IP) to foster consumer trust, economic growth, and innovation. Members include nearly 6,500 organizations, representing more than 34,350 individuals (trademark owners, professionals, and academics) from 185 countries, who benefit from the Association’s global trademark resources, policy development, education and training, and international network.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Retransmission Collective
    The Honourable Navdeep Bains, P.C., M.P. Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 The Honourable Mélanie Joly Minister of Canadian Heritage House of Commons Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 Copyright Board of Canada 56 Sparks St., Suite 800 Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C9 Re: A Consultation on Options for Reform to the Copyright Board of Canada Attention: [email protected] A. INTRODUCTION Canadian Retransmission Collective (CRC) is pleased to respond to the Government of Canada’s request for submissions of August 9, 2017 to all Copyright Board stakeholders, requesting commentary on the matters raised in the Consultation on Options for Reform to the Copyright Board of Canada (the “Discussion Paper”). CRC is a copyright collective representing thousands of program rights holders. Its affiliates include independent Canadian program producers, the National Film Board of Canada, producers of programs shown on Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and Réseau France Outremer (RFO), educational TV producers in Canada (except Télé-Québec), all foreign producers and broadcasters outside North America, and producers of music videos used in Canadian programs. CRC’s mandate is to ensure that distant signal royalties reflect an equitable market value and are flowed through to program rightsholders in a timely and efficient manner. Achieving these goals is essential to promoting a copyright ecosystem that encourages the creation and dissemination of new content. CRC fully supports the Government of Canada’s and the Copyright Board’s policy goals in reviewing the legislative and regulatory framework of the powers and procedures of the Board. All stakeholders – copyright owners, intermediaries, and users alike – will benefit from a more efficient Copyright Board process.
    [Show full text]
  • An Act to Amend the Copyright Act
    Bill C-32: An Act to amend the Copyright Act Publication No. 40-3-C32-E 20 July 2010 Dara Lithwick Legal and Legislative Affairs Division Parliamentary Information and Research Service Legislative Summary of Bill C-32 HTML and PDF versions of this publication are available on IntraParl (the parliamentary intranet) and on the Parliament of Canada website. In the electronic versions, a number of the endnote entries contain hyperlinks to referenced resources. Ce document est également publié en français. Library of Parliament Legislative Summaries summarize government bills currently before Parliament and provide background about them in an objective and impartial manner. They are prepared by the Parliamentary Information and Research Service, which carries out research for and provides information and analysis to parliamentarians and Senate and House of Commons committees and parliamentary associations. Legislative Summaries are revised as needed to reflect amendments made to bills as they move through the legislative process. Notice: For clarity of exposition, the legislative proposals set out in the bill described in this Legislative Summary are stated as if they had already been adopted or were in force. It is important to note, however, that bills may be amended during their consideration by the House of Commons and Senate, and have no force or effect unless and until they are passed by both houses of Parliament, receive Royal Assent, and come into force. Any substantive changes in this Legislative Summary that have been made since the preceding issue are indicated in bold print. Publication No. 40-3-C32-E Ottawa, Canada, Library of Parliament (2010) CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NEW YORK, 650 5TH AVE @ 52ND ST BOSTON, COPLEY PLACE Fashion
    NEW YORK, 650 5TH AVE @ 52ND ST BOSTON, COPLEY PLACE Fashion. Beauty. Business. DEC 2015 No. 2 FOLLOW US FOLLOW SHOP AT LANDSEND.COM AT SHOP ’Tis the Season! The fashion insider’s holiday gift guide, wish lists, books, retailer picks and party style. (And the time Salvador Dalí threw a mink- lined bathtub through Bonwit’s window.) WE BELIEVE IN YOU Edward Nardoza EDITOR IN CHIEF Pete Born EXECUTIVE EDITOR, BEAUTY Bridget Foley EXECUTIVE EDITOR James Fallon EDITOR Robb Rice GROUP DESIGN DIRECTOR ’Tis the Season! 46 To shine brightest in the evening, dress up with the John B. Fairchild most festive of accoutrements. 1927 — 2015 MANAGING EDITOR Peter Sadera MANAGING EDITOR, Dianne M. Pogoda Billy Reid’s bow tie, FASHION/SPECIAL REPORTS $125, billyreid.com EXECUTIVE EDITOR, EUROPE Miles Socha DEPUTY MANAGING EDITOR Evan Clark Ben Sherman’s leather NEWS DIRECTOR Lisa Lockwood hip flask gift set, $20, DEPUTY EDITOR, DATA AND ANALYSIS Arthur Zaczkiewicz Ben Sherman New SITTINGS DIRECTOR Alex Badia H SENIOR EDITOR, RETAIL David Moin York SENIOR EDITOR, SPECIAL PROJECTS, Arthur Friedman TEXTILES & TRADE Cartier’s Rotonde de SENIOR EDITOR, FINANCIAL Vicki M. Young Cartier Chronograph BUREAU CHIEF, LONDON Samantha Conti watch, $9,050, Cartier BUREAU CHIEF, MILAN Luisa Zargani BUREAU CHIEF, LOS ANGELES Marcy Medina stores ASIAN EDITOR Amanda Kaiser BUREAU CHIEF, WASHINGTON Kristi Ellis Brooks Brothers knot ASSOCIATE EDITOR Jenny B. Fine stud set, $325, Brooks SENIOR EDITOR, SPECIALTY RETAIL Sharon Edelson Brothers stores and E SENIOR PRESTIGE MARKET Julie Naughton BEAUTY EDITOR brooksbrothers.com. SENIOR FASHION FEATURES EDITOR Jessica Iredale ACCESSORIES MARKET DIRECTOR Roxanne Robinson FASHION MARKET DIRECTOR Mayte Allende EYE EDITOR Taylor Harris MEN’S SENIOR EDITOR Jean E.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Park the Upper East Side
    Hunter College High School The Jewish Museum Pascalou Sarabeth’s DINING & HOTELS Nightingale-Bamford School jacqueline kennedy onassis reservoir Yura on Madison The Dalton School RETAIL & SPECIALTY SHOPS Convent of the Sacred Heart First Program The Spence School Cooper-Hewitt, Smithsonian Design Museum SCHOOLS MUSEUMS & INSTITUTIONS National Academy Museum National Academy School of Fine Art SALONS Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum Saint David’s School ART GALLERIES The Dalton School museum mile 86th Neue Gallerie Morgenthal Frederics Theory Park Avenue Christian Church Day School the great lawn Lululemon Athletica Ramaz James Perse School Regis High School Grazie madison ave The Metropolitan Museum of Art Warren Tricomi Salon . fifth ave Marymount School delacourt theater Tambaran Gallery William Greenberg Desserts . American Museum of Natural History Loyola School & Hayden Planetarium turtle pond Crawford Doyle Booksellers belvedere castle Aesop PS 6 E.A.T. Adam Williams Fine Art New York Rudolf Steiner School Barbour . park ave Historical Society l’Occitane Skarstedt Gallery 79th Acquavella Gallery Gallery Mourlot Serafina All Souls School Almine Rech Gallery Lilly Pulitzer La Maison du Chocolat Alain Mikli Saint James Clothing Boutique Lady M Cake Boutique Sant Ambroeus Missoni central park The Mark Hotel Castelli Gallery Vera Wang Bride Allen Stevenson Gagosian Gallery Bemelmans Bar School the lake Vince The Carlyle Hotel Juice Press Cafe Boulud & Bar Pleiades loeb boathouse The Surrey Hotel Safani Gallery John Freida Salon Lenox Hill Hospital Christian Louboutin Carolina Herrera Diptyque Kilian strawberry fields French Consulate Apple The Met Breuer The Hewitt School David Webb bethesda fountain . Caravaggio Nancy Wiener Gallery Marché Madison Maison du Vin .
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit-Based Stockx Closes $110M Series C Led by DST Global, General Atlantic and GGV Capital; Names E-Commerce Veteran Scott Cutler CEO
    Detroit-based StockX Closes $110M Series C Led by DST Global, General Atlantic and GGV Capital; Names e-commerce Veteran Scott Cutler CEO Largest VC funding round in Michigan history Co-founder Josh Luber to remain on executive leadership team and board of directors Detroit, Michigan - June 26, 2019 StockX, the world’s first ‘stock market of things’, has closed on a $110 million Series C funding round from investment firms DST Global, General Atlantic, and GGV Capital. The company also announced today the appointment of Scott Cutler as CEO. Cutler succeeds co-founder Josh Luber, who will continue to serve on the executive leadership team and board of directors. The raise, in which current investors GV and Battery Ventures also participated, represents the largest in Michigan VC history to date and values StockX at over $1 billion. The company, which surpassed a $1 billion annual GMV run rate in less than three years, plans to leverage the new investment to further expand its international growth with a specific focus on Europe and the Asian markets. StockX has customers in nearly 200 countries and upwards of 15 million monthly active users. The funding will also allow the brand to diversify its product categories and extend its offline reach with brick-and-mortar locations in key international markets. The first-of-its-kind online ‘bid/ask’ marketplace will focus heavily on product development and will continue to collaborate with some of the world’s foremost brands to release products directly on the StockX platform through its “initial product offerings.” “GGV Capital has long seen the value of investing in e-commerce disruptors and StockX is no exception.
    [Show full text]
  • Module Ii Copyright and Related Rights
    MODULE II COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS Introduction General Part II of the TRIPS Agreement sets out the substantive standards for the protection of IP that WTO members should follow. This module outlines the provisions of Section 1 of Part II (running from Article 9 to Article 14), which sets out the protection that members must make available in the area of copyright and related rights – specifically, for literary and artistic works, performances, phonograms (or sound recordings) and broadcasts. This Section has to be read, like all other sections in Part II, together with the relevant provisions of certain pre-existing treaties in the area of international IP law that are incorporated by reference into the TRIPS Agreement. In the case of copyright, the relevant treaty is the Berne Convention; and on related rights, there are certain references to the Rome Convention. The relationship between the TRIPS Agreement and these Conventions is explained in section A3 below. As in the other areas of IP covered by the TRIPS Agreement, the provisions of Section 1 stipulate the minimum level of protection that members have to provide to nationals of other members. In other words, they determine the obligations that such members have towards each other. Given the long history of international cooperation on copyright matters, the national laws in this area are often fairly similar. However, to answer any question the reader may have on how the law applies in any practical situation, the applicable domestic law will have to be consulted. What are copyright and related rights? The term ‘copyright’ in its narrow sense usually refers to the rights of authors in their literary and artistic works.
    [Show full text]