DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 IRWUMP Part 1 Regional Context Public Review Draft 20210601

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 IRWUMP Part 1 Regional Context Public Review Draft 20210601 2020 UPPER SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED INTEGRATED REGIONAL URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 2020 IRUWMP EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 UPPER SANTA ANA RIVER WATERSHED 2020 IRUWMP – Public Review Draft Regional Context JUNE 2021 Prepared by Water Systems Consulting, Inc. and Woodard & Curran TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Background and Purpose ................................................................................................................1-3 1.1.1 IRWM Plan ................................................................................................................................1-3 1.1.2 Regional UWMP ......................................................................................................................1-4 1.1.3 2020 Integrated Regional Urban Water Management Plan .........................................1-5 1.2 Plan Organization ............................................................................................................................1-7 1.3 Regional Governance and Stakeholder Involvement .................................................................1-8 1.3.1 Regional Water Management Group .................................................................................1-8 1.3.2 Governance Structure .............................................................................................................1-9 1.3.3 Stakeholder Identification and Involvement ........................................................................1-9 1.3.4 Disadvantaged Community and Tribal Outreach ........................................................... 1-10 1.4 Plan Preparation Process .............................................................................................................. 1-11 1.4.1 Public Participation ............................................................................................................... 1-11 1.4.2 Stakeholder Workshops ...................................................................................................... 1-11 1.4.3 Planning, Reports and Technical Analyses ........................................................................ 1-13 1.5 Plan Adoption ................................................................................................................................. 1-14 1.6 Relation to Other Efforts ............................................................................................................... 1-15 1.6.1 Coordination with Neighboring IRWM Regions and IRWM Planning ......................... 1-15 1.6.2 IRUWMP Relation to Local Water Planning and Land Use Planning .......................... 1-17 2. Region Description ...................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Location ...............................................................................................................................................2-2 2.2 Water Agencies in the Region ........................................................................................................2-2 2.2.1 Water Supply Managers, Wholesalers and Retailers .....................................................2-5 2.2.2 Flood Control Agencies ........................................................................................................ 2-15 2.2.3 Other Water Related Entities ............................................................................................. 2-16 2.3 Population and Demographics .................................................................................................... 2-17 2.3.1 Historic Population and Housing Growth in the Plan Area ............................................ 2-17 2.3.2 Future Population Projections in the Plan Area ................................................................ 2-17 2.3.3 Economic Condition and Social and Cultural Composition of the Region ................... 2-19 2.4 Land Uses ........................................................................................................................................ 2-21 2.5 Ecological and Environmental Resources .................................................................................... 2-24 Upper Santa Ana River Watershed i 2020 IRUWMP – Public Review Draft Table of Contents 2.5.1 SAR Corridor .......................................................................................................................... 2-24 2.5.2 San Bernardino National Forest ......................................................................................... 2-26 2.5.3 U.S. Bureau of Land Management Area of Critical Environmental Concern ............. 2-27 2.5.4 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Woolly-Star Preserve Area .......................................... 2-28 2.5.5 Western Riverside County Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan ......................... 2-28 2.5.6 Upper Santa Ana River Habitat Conservation Plan ....................................................... 2-29 2.5.7 Wash Plan Habitat Conservation Plan ............................................................................. 2-29 2.5.8 Unarmored Threespine Stickleback Shay Pond Fish Refugium ..................................... 2-30 2.6 Regional Climate ............................................................................................................................ 2-31 2.6.1 Current Regional Climate .................................................................................................... 2-31 2.6.2 Potential Effects of Climate Change ................................................................................. 2-33 3. Regional Water Sources and Management .......................................................................................3-1 3.1 Surface Hydrology ...........................................................................................................................3-2 3.1.1 SAR Reaches .............................................................................................................................3-2 3.1.2 Natural Runoff ..........................................................................................................................3-3 3.2 Imported Water ................................................................................................................................3-7 3.2.1 SWP Overview .........................................................................................................................3-7 3.2.2 Imported Water Supply Reliability ................................................................................... 3-11 3.2.3 Valley District SWP Supply Reliability (Review)............................................................. 3-13 3.3 Groundwater .................................................................................................................................. 3-18 3.3.1 San Bernardino Basin ........................................................................................................... 3-20 3.3.2 Rialto-Colton Sub basin ....................................................................................................... 3-21 3.3.3 Riverside-Arlington Sub-basin ............................................................................................ 3-25 3.3.4 Yucaipa Sub basin ................................................................................................................ 3-26 3.3.5 San Timoteo Sub basin ......................................................................................................... 3-27 3.3.6 Chino Sub basin ..................................................................................................................... 3-28 3.3.7 Bear Valley Basin ................................................................................................................. 3-29 3.3.8 Recharge Area Programs .................................................................................................... 3-30 3.4 Recycled Water ............................................................................................................................. 3-33 3.5 Transfers, Exchanges, and Groundwater Banking Programs ................................................ 3-43 3.5.1 Transfers and Exchanges ..................................................................................................... 3-43 3.5.2 Groundwater Banking Programs ....................................................................................... 3-43 3.6 Planned Water Supply Projects and Programs ....................................................................... 3-44 3.6.1 Recycled Water .................................................................................................................... 3-44 3.6.2 Conjunctive Use Projects ...................................................................................................... 3-44 3.6.3 Groundwater Recharge ....................................................................................................... 3-45 Upper Santa Ana River Watershed ii 2020 IRUWMP – Public Review Draft Table of Contents 3.7 Development of Desalination ....................................................................................................... 3-50 3.7.1 Opportunities for Brackish Water and/or Groundwater Desalination
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RTD-Earthquake-Fact
    The California Water Fix Delta Tunnels don’t eliminate earthquake threats to water supply. Earthquake risk mythmaking serves water exporters’ interests. Water exporters misrepresent the risk of earthquakes to generate support for the Delta Tunnels. Fattening the levees is a more effective solution. Californians should work together to build a more seismically resistant Delta that will protect water exports, other critical infrastructure, and save lives -- all at a lower cost than the CA Water Fix. Developing regional water supplies provides a more reliable water supply. The best way to prevent earthquake disruption is to invest in local water solutions, including increased comprehensive water conservation and technology, maximizing wastewater reuse and groundwater recharge, while capturing storm water and rainwater, graywater, and fixing local leaky pipes. Cleaning up local aquifers and providing local jobs for local water makes economic sense. Rather than a huge investment in faraway tunnels let's instead make the levees in the Delta more resilient and prepare all California communities to be less reliant on imported water. MYTH #1: The Delta tunnels will protect California’s water supply from earthquakes. FACT: Earthquakes would hit the existing water transfer conveyance in other parts of California harder than they would hit the Delta. The earthquake threat to the Delta is minimal. The Hayward Fault is 40 miles from the Delta’s center. But the State Water Project (SWP) and federal Central Valley Project (CVP) cross right over high-risk fault areas, from Coalinga south to LA, including the San Andreas Fault. Cement canals in the southern part of the state are more vulnerable to earthquakes than Delta levees.
    [Show full text]
  • David K. Clark, PE
    AFC15 David K. Clark, PE THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAKE SHASTA LAKE OROVILLE Bay-Delta LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCTS (City of Los Angeles) COLORADO CALIFORNIA RIVER AQUEDUCT AQUEDUCT (State of Calif.) (Metropolitan) LOCAL SUPPLIES, RECYCLING, GROUNDWATER & CONSERVATION Background Seismic Preparedness Seismic upgrade of facilities Seismic vulnerability assessments Emergency response Collaboration with External Agencies Conclusions 1.7 billion gallons/day average 6 counties, 18 million residents Comprised of 26 member public agencies Imports Colorado River & State Water Project supplies Operates 5 water treatment & 16 hydroelectric plants Maintains 830 miles of pipeline & 9 reservoirs Biennial budget for FY 2014-16 is approximately $3 billion Comprehensive Reliability Strategy Water System InfrastructureInfrastructure System EmergencyEmergency Supply Capacity ReliabilityReliability FlexibilityFlexibility ResponseResponse Seismic Preparedness 1. Seismic Upgrade of Facilities 2. Vulnerability Assessments 3. Emergency Response 4. Collaboration w/External Agencies Scope: Buildings & Structures Dams & Reservoirs Geotechnical Hazards Drivers: Code Changes Increased Knowledge Approach: Re-assess as necessary Upgrade as required Use latest codes Use site-specific data Expect same performance as for new facilities Example of Code Changes (Weymouth Water Treatment Plant) Year Design Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) UBC 1933 0.1g UBC 1958 0.1g* UBC 1991 0.4g IBC 2009 0.52g IBC 2012 0.71g *Estimated value, PGA was not specifically
    [Show full text]
  • UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title California’s Mission Projects: The Spanish Imaginary in Riverside and Beyond Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1pp931x8 Author Sepulveda, Charles Anthony Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE California’s Mission Projects: The Spanish Imaginary in Riverside and Beyond A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ethnic Studies by Charles Anthony Sepulveda August 2016 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Robert Perez, Chairperson Dr. Anthony Macias Dr. Michelle Raheja Copyright by Charles Anthony Sepulveda 2016 The Dissertation of Charles Anthony Sepulveda is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There aren’t enough words to thank those who have helped me along the way, and this is merely a partial list. I have to begin by thanking my parents, Carolyn and Jim Thorsen - and - Charles and Gail Sepulveda, who provided me with the foundations necessary to make the choices I have in my life. My Aunt Billie who passed away in 2015 was one of my favorite people on this planet and I will be forever grateful to her. I miss her incredibly. I want to thank Irene Sepulveda- Hastings, one of the remaining elders from my Dad’s family – who I still need to interview! I have to thank the Belardes family; 2015 was a tough year, Chief David Belardes also passed. I want to remember and thank all of my family and ancestors who came before me.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Santa Ana River Conservation and Conjunctive Use Project Decision Support Model (SARCCUP DSM)
    Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Santa Ana River Conservation and Conjunctive Use Project Decision Support Model (SARCCUP DSM) SARCCUP DSM MODEL DOCUMENTATION DRAFT MARCH 2017 Prepared for Prepared by 1. Introduction The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and its five member agencies, Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA), Orange County Water District (OCWD), San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (SBVMWD), and Western Municipal Water District (WMWD), collectively “Agencies” in this memorandum, are developing and implementing the Santa Ana River Conservation and Conjunctive Use Project (SARCCUP). SARCCUP is a collaborative regional program that will improve the water supply resiliency of the Santa Ana River Watershed through development of additional dry year yield, reduced water use, and improved habitat for native threatened species populations. The primary goal of the conjunctive use element is to maximize the development and use of imported water supplies and to conjunctively manage these local and imported water supplies such that the aggregate yield and water supply reliability generated by the SARCCUP is greater than the independent management of these resources. Phase 1 of SARCCUP will develop an 180,000 acre‐foot (AF) groundwater bank storage program with capacity to recharge and store 60,000 acre‐feet per year (AFY) during each of three wet years in a decade and extraction facilities to withdraw 60,000 AFY in each of three dry years in a decade. SARCCUP management will also include the ability to utilize transfers and exchanges of other water supplies in lieu of recharging and extracting banked groundwater. In support of the future development of a SARCCUP Master Plan for the conjunctive use element, the Agencies have engaged the CH2M team to develop a Santa Ana River watershed‐wide decision support model (DSM) to optimize the conjunctive use element of SARCCUP.
    [Show full text]
  • 223± Acres of Land in Diamond Valley Lake 12-Parcels, Riverside County
    LAND FOR SALE DIAMOND VALLEY LAKE 12 PARCELS City of Hemet and 223± ACRES, 12 PARCELS Riverside County, California The Seller makes no representations or warranties Aerial Drone Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch? as to the potential use or fitness of this property for development and the accuracy of the information v=rE4bkV0MARA&feature=youtu.be provided. Interested parties should make their own inquiries and investigations to confirm property information. Terms of sale and availability are For Listing Information, please contact: Phyvin Mok subject to change or withdrawal without notice. Real Property Group, Acquisition and Disposition Team (213) 217-6111 | [email protected] THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIAMOND VALLEY LAKE 12 PARCELS LAND FOR SALE City of Hemet and 223± ACRES, 12 PARCELS Riverside County, California TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Listing Summary 2. Riverside County Assessor Parcel Numbers 3. Property Information 4. Area Information 5. Area Map 6. Location Map THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIAMOND VALLEY LAKE 12 PARCELS LAND FOR SALE City of Hemet and 223± ACRES, 12 PARCELS Riverside County, California LISTING SUMMARY Property: Diamond Valley Lake 12-Parcels Total Lot Size: Total 223± acres; The subject property is comprised of five disparate groups of assessor’s parcels, each group within an approximately three-mile-wide radius, in an area to the northwest of Diamond Valley Lake, in unincorporated Riverside County (Group 1 through 4), and in the City of Hemet (Group 5), California Listing Price: NEGOTIABLE Terms: All Cash at Closing, no financing contingency Property Condition: The Property is being offered AS-IS, WHERE IS, WITH ALL FAULTS Zoning: Zoning information provided herein is for informational purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Be Active Resource Directory, Please Contact
    Riverside County 1 The Network for a Healthy California— Desert Sierra Region Be Active Resource Directory9-2011 • Riverside County • A directory including free & low cost physical activity, nutrition & health assistance resources It is our hope that this resource directory will prove to be a valuable tool for families in discovering activities that are free or reasonably priced; for professionals in promoting affordable referrals for their low-income clients; and the community at large who are dedicated to promoting health and wellness for all adults, children and youth. Most of the community resources are specific to physical activity and nutrition services; however, some provide other health services. The directory may be downloaded for free at http://www.sbcounty.gov/eatwell. For more information, or to inquire how you can have your resource listed in the Be Active Resource Directory, please contact: Pamela Sampson, RD Andrea Morey Physical Activity Coordinator Physical Activity Coordinator San Bernardino County DPH-Nutrition Riverside County DPH-Nutrition Services 909-387-9144 951-358-5977 [email protected] [email protected] This material was produced by the California Department of Public Health, Network for a Healthy California, with funding from the USDA SNAP, known in California as CalFresh (formerly the Food Stamp Program). These institutions are equal opportunity providers and employers. In California, food stamps provide assistance to low-income households, and can help buy nutritious foods for better health.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.5K 4.5 2.0 250 810K 264B
    DIAMOND VALLEY LAKE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA’S LARGEST RESERVOIR Diamond Valley Lake is known for its fishing, hiking and biking trails and seasonal wildflower blooms. It is considered to be one of the top destinations in the west for bass fishing, and has a new, improved marina for recreational visitors. DVL NUMBERS Diamond Valley Lake, located in southwest Riverside County, 90 miles southeast from Los Angeles, began operation March 18, 2000 and is Southern California’s largest drinking water reservoir. It has a surface area of 4,500 acres and is 4.5 miles long and about 2 miles wide with a depth up to 250 feet. DVL holds nearly twice as much water as all other 4.5K acre surface area Southern California’s surface reservoirs combined. With a capacity of 810,000 acre-feet, or nearly 264 billion gallons, DVL was designed to meet the region’s emergency and drought needs for six months. It is critical to Metropolitan’s water supply reliability and operational 4.5 flexibility. The reservoir cost $1.9 billion to construct. miles long Water stored in DVL travels from Northern California through the State Water Project 2.0 and its 444-mile California Aqueduct before being delivered to the reservoir through miles wide the Inland Feeder and the Eastside Pipeline. Stored water can be routed to almost all of Metropolitan’s service area, as far west as Ventura County, if needed during a drought or an emergency. 250 feet deep 810K acre-foot capacity 264B gallon capacity THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA June 2019 ENVIRONMENT South of DVL is the nearly 14,000-acre Southwestern Riverside County Multi-Species Reserve, created in partnership with Metropolitan.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP of the CORONA NORTH 7.5' QUADRANGLE, RIVERSIDE and SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Prepared in cooperation with the OPEN-FILE REPORT 02-22 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF MINES AND GEOLOGY sciencescience forfor a changingchanging worldworld 117o 37' 30" 117 o 30' CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS 34o 00' 34o 00' Qaf Qw MODERN SURFICIAL DEPOSITS—Sediment recently transported and Puente Formation (early Pliocene and Miocene)—Marine sandstone, GEOLOGIC SUMMARY deposited in channels and washes, on surfaces of alluvial fans and alluvial siltstone, and shale. Named by Eldrige and Arnold (1907) for plains, and on hillslopes. Soil-profile development is non-existent. exposures in Puente Hills. English (1926) extended distribution of The Corona North quadrangle is located near the northern end of Holocene Includes: Puente Formation to area south of Puente Hills, subdividing three units, the Peninsular Ranges Province. All but the southwestern tip of the Qyw Qyf Qya Qye Qaf Artificial fill (late Holocene)—Deposits of fill resulting from human from youngest to oldest, (1) shale, sandstone, and conglomerate (2) quadrangle is within the Perris block, a relatively stable, rectangular in construction or mining activities; restricted to three noncontiguous sandstone, and (3) shale. Daviess and Woodford (1949) subdivided plan, area located between the Elsinore and San Jacinto fault zones. Qyf1 areas (1) south of 91 Freeway, (2) on Norco Navel Reservation, and (3) Puente Formation in northwestern Puente Hills into four members, The southwestern tip of the quadrangle is marginally within the Chino QUATERNARY sand and gravel mining in Santa Ana River channel from youngest to oldest, (1) Sycamore Canyon Member, (2) upper fault zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Resilience Report Is Located on the Seismic Resilience Sharepoint Site
    REPORT SEISMIC RESILIENCE FIRST BIENNIAL REPORT The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 700 N. Alameda Street, Los Angeles, California 90012 Report No. 1551 February 2018 The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Seismic Resilience First Biennial Report SEISMIC RESILIENCE FIRST BIENNIAL REPORT Prepared By: The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California 700 North Alameda Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Report Number 1551 February 2018 Report No. 1551 – February 2018 iii The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California Seismic Resilience First Biennial Report Copyright © 2018 by The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. The information provided herein is for the convenience and use of employees of The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) and its member agencies. All publication and reproduction rights are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means without written permission from The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. Any use of the information by any entity other than Metropolitan is at such entity's own risk, and Metropolitan assumes no liability for such use. Prepared under the direction of: Gordon Johnson Chief Engineer Prepared by: Robb Bell Engineering Services Don Bentley Water Resource Management Winston Chai Engineering Services David Clark Engineering Services Greg de Lamare Engineering Services Ray DeWinter Administrative Services Edgar Fandialan Water Resource Management Ricardo Hernandez
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Santa Ana River Tributaries Restoration Project and Mitigation Reserve Program
    Upper Santa Ana River Tributaries Restoration Project and Mitigation Reserve Program TRIBUTRIBUTARY RESTORATION Draft Environmental Impact Report | April 2019 Prepared for: San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District 380 East Vanderbilt Way San Bernardino, California Prepared by: ICF 1250 Corona Pointe Ct, Suite 406 Corona, California Contents List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... vii List of Acronyms and Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... xv Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.2 Background .................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.3 Project Location and Area .............................................................................................. ES-2 ES.4 Project Objectives .......................................................................................................... ES-4 ES.5 Project Description .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rancholabrean Vertebrates from the Las Vegas Formation, Nevada
    Quaternary International xxx (2017) 1e17 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint The Tule Springs local fauna: Rancholabrean vertebrates from the Las Vegas Formation, Nevada * Eric Scott a, , Kathleen B. Springer b, James C. Sagebiel c a Dr. John D. Cooper Archaeological and Paleontological Center, California State University, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA b U.S. Geological Survey, Denver Federal Center, Box 25046, MS-980, Denver CO 80225, USA c Vertebrate Paleontology Laboratory, University of Texas at Austin R7600, 10100 Burnet Road, Building 6, Austin, TX 78758, USA article info abstract Article history: A middle to late Pleistocene sedimentary sequence in the upper Las Vegas Wash, north of Las Vegas, Received 8 March 2017 Nevada, has yielded the largest open-site Rancholabrean vertebrate fossil assemblage in the southern Received in revised form Great Basin and Mojave Deserts. Recent paleontologic field studies have led to the discovery of hundreds 19 May 2017 of fossil localities and specimens, greatly extending the geographic and temporal footprint of original Accepted 2 June 2017 investigations in the early 1960s. The significance of the deposits and their entombed fossils led to the Available online xxx preservation of 22,650 acres of the upper Las Vegas Wash as Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monu- ment. These discoveries also warrant designation of the assemblage as a local fauna, named for the site of the original paleontologic studies at Tule Springs. The large mammal component of the Tule Springs local fauna is dominated by remains of Mammuthus columbi as well as Camelops hesternus, along with less common remains of Equus (including E.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Paleontology, Stratigraphy, and Paleohydrology of Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument, Nevada (Usa)
    GEOLOGY OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST an open-access journal of the Utah Geological Association Volume 4 2017 VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, STRATIGRAPHY, AND PALEOHYDROLOGY OF TULE SPRINGS FOSSIL BEDS NATIONAL MONUMENT, NEVADA (USA) Kathleen B. Springer, Jeffrey S. Pigati, and Eric Scott A Field Guide Prepared For SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY Annual Meeting, October 26 – 29, 2016 Grand America Hotel Salt Lake City, Utah, USA © 2017 Utah Geological Association. All rights reserved. For permission to copy and distribute, see the following page or visit the UGA website at www.utahgeology.org for information. Email inquiries to [email protected]. GEOLOGY OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST an open-access journal of the Utah Geological Association Volume 4 2017 Editors UGA Board Douglas A. Sprinkel Thomas C. Chidsey, Jr. 2016 President Bill Loughlin [email protected] 435.649.4005 Utah Geological Survey Utah Geological Survey 2016 President-Elect Paul Inkenbrandt [email protected] 801.537.3361 801.391.1977 801.537.3364 2016 Program Chair Andrew Rupke [email protected] 801.537.3366 [email protected] [email protected] 2016 Treasurer Robert Ressetar [email protected] 801.949.3312 2016 Secretary Tom Nicolaysen [email protected] 801.538.5360 Bart J. Kowallis Steven Schamel 2016 Past-President Jason Blake [email protected] 435.658.3423 Brigham Young University GeoX Consulting, Inc. 801.422.2467 801.583-1146 UGA Committees [email protected] [email protected] Education/Scholarship Loren Morton [email protected] 801.536.4262 Environmental
    [Show full text]