Aquaculture in Russian Regions Executive Summary

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

10/14/2019 Aquaculture in Russian regions By Lubov Bychkova Innovation Norway Moscow [email protected] April 2019 www.innovationnorway.no 1 Executive summary • New trend in Russia - Aquaculture sector development! • Local and foreign private investors shows interest to large aquaculture projects • Russian government identified Aquaculture as a top priority sector within the Agriculture industry. • Aquaculture is relatively young sector and has 4% of country’s fish production. However, the sector started to gain the traction and now it's considered to be a rapidly developed one, showing 29% growth during last 5 years. • Market size 2018 : 232 000 t (+7%) Plan 2030 : 700 000 t • Russia has vast water resources that are suitable for aquaculture development but only a small percent of them is in business use so far. The State Federal Agency for Fisheries by May 2019 allocated 3 700 water sites of the total area 500 000 hectare. started to actively prepare more water sites for fish farming to be allocated through the auction system. • 3 Russian Federal Districts have conditions for real development of aquaculture: Far East, South and North-West. • There are about 3,000 farms in total operating in aquaculture industry. 72% of them are pond and pasture farms, 25% are industrial (where 5 % share is mariculture and 1% only is RAS). 62% of all farm enterprises produce less then 10 tons of fish, and only 1% of them has production volume over 1,000 t. • Carp, trout, salmon and sturgeon are 4 main species in aquaculture production in Russia. • Aquaculture in Russia has some problems hampering the strong development of this business: this is the legislative base, which already needs revision and update, lack of enough volumes and high quality of local fish feed and hatcheries, not enough good roads approaching water sites for fish farms, insufficient funding and financing, lacking large and strong industrial associations capable to lobby and protect interests of aquaculture business on the top level, lack of well-educated personnel capable to operate modern industrial fish farm. • However, the ambitious goal of Russian government is to increase fish consumption in the country from 12-14 kg/capita/annum to 23 kg/capita/annum, targeted the aquaculture sector to increase the local production up to 410 000 tons by 2020 and up to 700 000 tons by 2030. • This shows huge market potential for investors, suppliers of fish farming technologies, international expertise to find the niche market in Russia and to increase sales. • Several Norwegian suppliers of marine, fresh-water and land-based technology, equipment, nets, fish feed, software, genetics, services, etc has been already involved in setting up marine and land-based sites for salmonids, having track record of sales in Murmansk, Karelia and other Russian regions. 2 2 1 10/14/2019 Russian seafood market overview Total market fish & seafood volume 1,9 4,6 Mln t Mln t Import 2,7 Export 0,56 Mln t 0,17 2,7 Catch Aquaculture 3,90 Internal market Actual consumption 146,5 18,7 kg/year Mln people 2,7 Per capita Mln t Population of RF Consumption Plans: 22-24 kg/year volume Fish & seafood consumption 3 3 Fish consumption potential in Russia Population: 146,5 mln people Kg/capita/annum Recommended Recent Deficit Russian Market consumption volume 3,3 - 5,3 deficit 22-24 18,7 460-780 MT 4 4 2 10/14/2019 World aquaculture Region/Country Production volume, Aquaculture species thousand tons Asia 93 000 Carp, tilapia, fresh water catfish, crustaceans, shellfish, seaweed North and South America 3 350 Salmonids (Chili), crustaceans Europe 2 930 Salmon (Norway, UK), carp, shellfish (Spain, France) Africa 1 710 Tilapia Russia 232 Carp, white fish, salmonids, sturgeon Pacific countries 189 Shellfish, salmonids, sturgeon 5 5 Aquaculture market size in Russia 700 Real production volumes, thousand tons 205,3 219,7 232 170,2 186 188,6 177,9 131,7 142 143,4 152,9 78,2 86,7 105,2 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2030 The Russian Federation is not yet one of the global leaders in aquaculture. However, growth rates of 10 %-15 % demonstrated in recent years inspires optimism. 6 6 3 10/14/2019 Aquaculture water resources in use and available > 3 600 fish farming sites are in use 23% 76,0 229,2 North-West region Far East Central region 22,4 124,6 8,5 42,1 Southern region 155,6 91,6 Siberia North Caucases Volga region Urals region 31,5 1,3 79,8 17,2 20,5 27,2 258,3 1 104,1 7 7 Aquaculture situation in Russia Production volume 2018 0,2 mln t Growth 5,6% 2018 However, production volumes increased threefold since 2000! Large water Consumers resource bank 145 mln people but Old or simple but + + technology not big choice of Low fish water sites consumption for aquaculture 8 8 4 10/14/2019 Market structure, by fish species Farmed fish species market share 65% 25% 4% 2% 9% Carp Salmonids Invertebrates sturgeon other Production of Carp Production of salmonids 2018 Thousand tons Thousand tons Southern District; 58 North-West District; 58,7 Others; 16 Central North District; 22 Caucases, 16 Siberia, 2,7 Siberia, Urals; 0,33 North-Caucases & South; 1,3 9 Market structure, by farm size Aquaculture farms structure, by production volume 67% 19% 12% 2% <50 t/annum 50-100 t/annum 101-1000 t/annum >1000 t/annum Farms sizes, by production volumes 3,2 thousand farms 8,20% 0,90% 8,80% in total 26,80% 20,10% 35,20% 13,2 thousand employees in the sector < 1 t 1-10 t 11-50 t 51-100 t 101-1000 t 1000+ t The goal: fish farms of industrial types have to occupy 40% of the Russian market by 2030. 10 10 5 10/14/2019 Market structure, by production volume o Over 71 % of farmed fish was produced by pond and pasture aquaculture farms (the farms with low technical resources ) o Industrial aquaculture is represented by fishpond Fishpond farms, 23%, farms, mariculture and RAS. o Industrial aquaculture keeps 29 % of the total production: Mariculture farms, 5% 23 % out of it is produced by fishpond farms RAS, 1% Pond and pasture aquaculture, 5 % by mariculture of invertebrates and 71% macrophytes Only 1 % of farmed fish is produced on basin farms 11 11 Aquaculture production: by regions North-West, Far East, 13,000 t+ 59,500 t +34 % +21 % Central,34,500 t Urals: 10,000 t +1,2 % +15,5 % Siberia: 6,600 t Volga:14,100 t South,78,600 t North-Caucasus, 18,900 t 12 12 6 10/14/2019 North-West Federal District o North-West Federal District includes 11 subjects of Russian Federation: Arkhangelsk, Vologda, Kaliningrad, Karelia, Komi, Leningrad region, Murmansk, Nenets district, Novgorod, Pskov, St. Petersburg o Population: 14,5 mln people o Fresh water fund: 63 000 lakes and 27 000 rivers. This is 5,5 mln hectars of water area. Largest lakes which are also the largest in Europe: Ladoga, Onega, Pskov-Chud and Ilmen. Access to seas of Arctic and Atlantic oceans. Coast line 630 km. Fish species, 2018 o 369 water sites (21 000 hectar) are in use out of 422 sites available (25 000 hectar) in total. o Entire region produce 88% of all industrial salmonids aquaculture in the country and 65% of other fish species. Karelia produces 90% of all trout in Russia. 28% o Production volumes 2018: 59,500 t. (+41% from 2017) Plans 2020: 149,000 t o NWFD aquaculture specialization: salmonids, white fish (Coregonidae). 11% 61% Fish production 2018, 1000 t others; Murman 1,5; 2 % sk Leningra region; Carp others Salmonids d region; 21,4; 36 9,4; 16 % % State support of NWFD 2017: 83,5 mln Rub Karelia Republic ; 27,2; 13 46 % 13 North-West Federal District Leningrad region • Leningrad region is one of the leading in commercial aquaculture. All types of fish farming activities: lake- pond cages, cold water industrial farming (cages), warm water cage farming (waters from heating plants), pasture, RAS. • 42 fish farms in total are operating in Leningrad region, including 7 state owned and private hatcheries. • Production volumes: 9 400 tons (+6% from 2017). Plan 2020 – 11 000 t, 2030 – 20 000 t. • Leningrad region aquaculture makes 16% of the total NW District production • 95% Rainbow trout. 5% - Other species: sturgeon (in warm water), carp, white fish, whiteleg shrimp • Leningrad region investors are interested in RAS aquaculture the most. Main fish species: rainbow trout (97%), the rest re white fish, frdh water catfish, nelma (Stenodus leucichthys), Lake char (Salvelinus lepechini), pike. • New opportunity: first 4 water sites (286 hectar) in Gulf of Finland waters are provided for fish farming. • 11 biggest fish farmed enterprises: «Rybstandard» www.interatlantic.ru (trout, carp, sturgeon, fish fry) Trout farm «Kuzntchnoe» www.kuznechnoe.ru – trout, whitefish, sturgeon «Econ» – 500 t of trout «Forvat» LLC – trout and muksun «Gavan» - 26 cages (551 tons of trout) «SHP Salma» - trout, whitefish «Primorskoe»\ «Laplandia» www.laplandia.spb.ru trout «Fish Federation farms» - warm water fish farming sturgeon www.fish-rf-com «CapshOzero» - Sturgeon Federal fish farming center «Ropscha» - trout «Neva» LLC – trout www.forelushka.ru «Northern Shrimp»LLC – whilteleg shrimp, 20 t/2019. Plan 2021: 200 t/annum 14 • Federal Selection and Genetic Center of Fish Breeding «ROPSHA» 14 7 10/14/2019 North-West Federal District Murmansk region • 17 fish enterprises farm atlantic salmon, trout, sturgeon in the region. Farmed fish volume 2018 in the region: 21,300 t (+56% from year 2017) 3 bln Rubles of State financial support in 2018 to fish farmers have been received by 2 large farms out of 17 existing.
Recommended publications
  • The Belford Neighborhood Revitalization Plan

    The Belford Neighborhood Revitalization Plan

    The Belford Neighborhood Revitalization Plan Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy Fall 2012 Members: Rich Bartholomew, Andrew Chew, Charlotte Colon-Alvarez, Greg Contente, Kevin Dillon, Jonathan Kristofich, Kayla Malsbury, Emily Manz, Marisa Rodriguez-McGill, & Jonathan Scharff 1 Table of Contents Mission Statement This plan, the Belford Neighborhood Revitalization Plan, was prepared as the final outcome of a graduate student studio class at The Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy at Executive Summary .............................................................4 Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey. The studio met from September through December TheNeighborhood Belford Revitalization Plan of 2012 and was tasked by Middletown Township with developing a document that would refine, TheNeighborhood Belford Revitalization Plan Neighborhood Context .............................................................8 build upon, and put into action the Port of Belford Economic Feasibility Study and Conceptual Relation to Other Plans .............................................................38 Development Plan completed in 2009 by the Louis Berger Group for the Township of Middletown. During the formation of the Belford Neighborhood Revitalization plan, Hurricane Sandy struck New Research Process .............................................................45 Jersey. This event inflenced both the objectives and the strategies contained within the plan. Goals
  • The Arup Journal

    THE ARUP JOURNAL 3/1993 Front cover: Project Dragonfly. (Photo: Ken Newman) Back cover: THEARUP Holborn Bars. (Photo: Peter Mackinven) JOURNAL Vol.28 No3 Editor: 3/1993 David J. Brown Art Editor: Desmond Wyeth FCSD Published by Ove Arup Partnership Deputy Editor: 13 Fitzroy Street. Helene Murphy London Editorial Assistant: W1P680 Kris Buglear 3 'Future Assurance': The renovation of the Prudential Corporation head offices in The redevelopment London involved upgrading Alfred Waterhouse's celebrated of Holborn Bars building to modern standards without alteration to its listed interiors David Alling, Ken Coffin, and fa<;:ade , the comprehensive refurbishment of the remaining Ian McVitty, Patrick Morreau, Waterhouse buildings on the site, and the replacement of other Roy Wheeler structures there with 36 500m2 of new. high specification offices. 8 British Airways Ove Arup & Partners Cardiff office were design team leaders for Project Dragonfly the creation of this advanced maintenance facility for 747 jumbo Steven Luke jets at Cardiff Wales Airport. Considerable attention to environmental sensitivities was necessary in its planning, whilst the building itself 'llll!= ~~~~ilt;~' involved installing state-of-the-art specialist maintenance structures ~ as well as raising probably the longest continuous space girders in Europe. 16 Pescanova fish factory, Following the recovery of Namibia's fishing industry after the Liideritz, Namibia country's independence in 1990, the Spanish fishing group Barrie Williams Pescanova commissioned Arups to plan and design their new fish factory, plus causeway and jetty, at a bare rock site on the shore, north of the town of Luderitz. 20 The Oxyco development, Ove Arup & Partners Zimbabwe were principal agent and multi­ Harare, Zimbabwe disciplinary consultants for Oxyco Gases' new manufacturing, Lotte Reimer storage, and sales facility.
  • COUNTRY SECTION United States Fishery Products

    COUNTRY SECTION United States Fishery Products

    Validity date from COUNTRY United States 22/01/2021 00499 SECTION Fishery products Date of publication 28/07/2007 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 1000025102 GET SEAFOOD, INC. Winter Haven Florida PP 08/04/2013 1000025909 Fagan Alligator Products, Inc. Dade City Florida PP 1000084596 Sea-Trek Enterprises, Inc. East Greenwich Rhode Island PP O! 10/07/2008 1000112376 Pontchartrain Blue Crab Slidell Louisiana PP 14/04/2010 1000113172 Fishermen's Ice & Bait, Inc. Madeira Beach Florida PP 1000113708 Beck's Smokery Pompano Beach Florida PP 1000113902 Colorado Boxed Beef Co. Port Everglades Florida CS 16/11/2011 1000114005 D & D Seafood Corporation Marathon Florida PP 1000114027 BAMA SEA PRODUCTS St. Petersburg Florida PP 1000114048 Moon's Seafood Company W. Melbourne Florida PP O! 1000114049 Glanbia Performance Nutrition (Manufacturing), Inc., Florida Sunrise Florida PP 13/10/2017 Facility 1000114069 Placeres & Sons Seafood Hialeah Florida PP 1000114070 Webb's Seafood, Inc. Youngstown Florida PP 14/10/2009 1000114156 Cox's Wholesale Seafood, Inc. Tampa Florida PP 1000114170 Kings Seafood, Inc. Port Orange Florida PP 1 / 59 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 1000114326 Optimus, Inc. Dba Marky's Miami Florida PP 1000115645 AMERIQUAL FOODS LLC Evansville Indiana PP 06/02/2019 1000115810 Henriksen Fisheries, Inc Sister Bay Wisconsin PP 1000117125 RB Manufacturing LLC Salt Lake City Utah PP 08/01/2015 1000120312 Stauber Performance Ingredients, Inc. Florida New York PP 08/08/2019 1000120556 Plenus Group, Inc. Lowell Massachusetts PP 06/05/2008 1000120753 GARBO LOBSTER LLC Groton Connecticut PP 17/10/2016 1000121950 True World Foods, NY LLC Elizabeth New Jersey PP Aq 1000122358 Lamonica Fine Foods, Inc.
  • Environmental Management Plan

    Environmental Management Plan

    Environmental Management Plan Exigrade Feeds Pty (Ltd.) Luderitz, Namibia Endorsed By: Jacobus Smit Endorsed By: Operational Director Signature: ____________________________ Date: 1/06/2019 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN Exigrade Feeds, Luderitz EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Exigrade Feeds Pty Ltd is an existing fishmeal plant, situated on the premises of Pescanova Seafood factory in Luderitz, Namibia. The aim of this Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is to identify and address any environmental risks associated with the facility. As the facility is within an industrial area in the Fishing Harbour of Luderitz, it is surrounded by similar industrial facilities. Due to the nature and location of the development, impact can however be expected on the surrounding environment, see summary of potential impact below. Regular environmental performance monitoring will continue and be updated on an continues basis, to ensure compliance and that corrective measures be taken if necessary. The fishing industry is one of the biggest contributors to the Namibian economy and is a major contributor to employment in the coastal area. The existing operations at Exigrade Feeds is contributing to the local economy by increased productivity and value addition, through continued employment, and by providing opportunities for other local businesses for service delivery. The major concerns related to the operational activities at the Exigrade Feeds premises are that of air quality, waste production, fuel storage and consumption, and surface water impacts. All relevant local regulations and accepted best practices should always be adhered to. Noise and air pollution should always meet the minimum requirements to prevent air pollution and not to cause a nuisance to nearby receptors.
  • The Final Report and Action Plan Can Be Downloaded Here

    The Final Report and Action Plan Can Be Downloaded Here

    Kevin Irons Aquaculture and Aquatic Nuisance Species Program Manager Illinois Department of Natural Resources One Natural Resources Way Springfield, IL 62702-1271 Email: [email protected] Phone: 217.557.0719 Gina Behnfeldt Vice President, Economic Development Services Tetra Tech One Oxford Valley, Suite 200 Langhorne, PA 19047 Email: [email protected] Phone: 215.702.4094 ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ASIAN CARP BUSINESS PROCESS ANALYSIS | FINAL REPORT AND ACTION PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................1 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................................1 Steering Committee ..............................................................................................................................................1 Asian Carp Regional Coordinating Committee (ACRCC) .....................................................................................2 Research ..............................................................................................................................................................2 Recommendation Development.......................................................................................................................... 10 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................................................
  • In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire

    In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire

    ANTHONY CROSS In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of The Russian Empire (1613-1917) OpenBook Publishers To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/268 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917) Anthony Cross http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2014 Anthony Cross The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt it and to make commercial use of it providing that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Cross, Anthony, In the Land of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917), Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/ OBP.0042 Please see the list of illustrations for attribution relating to individual images. Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omissions or errors will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. As for the rights of the images from Wikimedia Commons, please refer to the Wikimedia website (for each image, the link to the relevant page can be found in the list of illustrations).
  • PDF Download

    PDF Download

    INDOOR AIR Q~ALITY IN MUSEUMS AND HISTORICAL BUILDINGS IN ST. PETERSBURG AND IN NORTH-WEST REGION OF RUSSIA V.D.Korkin Institute of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture by name I.Repi& Russia ABSTRACT This presentation deals with the problem of achieving stable microclimate in old buddmgs of St Petersburg - such as churches, museums and palaces. Characteristic traits of such buildings are rather thick envelops which as a rule accumulate large quantities of heat or cold. The majority of these buildings are equipped only with central water heating and are naturally ventilated. Experimental study of microclimate in buildings of this kind proves that during cold season (with average temperature -10”C)the relative humidity there will be about 30-35% and less. In summer time temperature background does not rise above 22-24°C whereas the relative humidity sometimes can rise up to 75-80Y0. Eventually we should like to note that climate parameters of St Petersburg can be taken as a characteristic for entire Norten-West of Russia. Inserting into such buildings air conditioning systems (provided with cooling plants and devices for automatic control) does not aways give positive results. With consideration of climate features of the region and peculiarities of the buildings we worked out system which helps to maintain stable microclimate, special attention to thermrd inertia of walls included. This decision will give an oppotiunity to reduce a load on heating system at any rate to 15-20%. It will also give the chance for adiabatic humidity control in winter which is nessessary for the humidity control.
  • Aquaculture and Marine Mammals: Co-Existence Or Conflict?

    Aquaculture and Marine Mammals: Co-Existence Or Conflict?

    P ART I CHAPTER 11 AQUACULTURE AND MARINE MAMMALS: CO-EXISTENCE OR CONFLICT? Catherine M. Kemper, David Pemberton, Martin Cawthorn, Sonja Heinrich, Janet Mann, Bernd Würsig, Peter Shaughnessy and Rosemary Gales .................................................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. INTRODUCTION Feeding mechanisms are equally diverse, ranging from no sup- Marine and freshwater aquaculture is the fastest growing world plementary feeding for most molluscs to using vegetable prod- food industry; 11% per year during the 1990s (Newton 2000). ucts, fishmeal, pellets (made from wild caught marine fish) and In part, this is a result of the reduction of both major and minor whole fish (e.g. pilchards to fatten tuna). Almost all operations wild fisheries (Pauly et al. 2002) and an increased demand for are in sheltered coastal or estuarine waters and therefore add seafood. An estimated 25% of seafood consumed is produced by pressure on environments already influenced by human aquaculture and this is set to rise to 40% by 2010 (FAO 2000). impacts. Even land-based aquaculture can affect the coastal One of the justifications given for turning to aquaculture is that marine environment through increased nutrients and pollution it will relieve the pressure on wild fish stocks,
  • At T He Tsar's Table

    At T He Tsar's Table

    At T he Tsar’s Table Russian Imperial Porcelain from the Raymond F. Piper Collection At the Tsar’s Table Russian Imperial Porcelain from the Raymond F. Piper Collection June 1 - August 19, 2001 Organized by the Patrick and Beatrice Haggerty Museum of Art, Marquette University © 2001 Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. All rights reserved in all countries. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system without the prior written permission of the author and publisher. Photo credits: Don Stolley: Plates 1, 2, 4, 5, 11-22 Edward Owen: Plates 6-10 Dennis Schwartz: Front cover, back cover, plate 3 International Standard Book Number: 0-945366-11-6 Catalogue designed by Jerome Fortier Catalogue printed by Special Editions, Hartland, Wisconsin Front cover: Statue of a Lady with a Mask Back cover: Soup Tureen from the Dowry Service of Maria Pavlovna Haggerty Museum of Art Staff Curtis L. Carter, Director Lee Coppernoll, Assistant Director Annemarie Sawkins, Associate Curator Lynne Shumow, Curator of Education Jerome Fortier, Assistant Curator James Kieselburg, II, Registrar Andrew Nordin, Preparator Tim Dykes, Assistant Preparator Joyce Ashley, Administrative Assistant Jonathan Mueller, Communications Assistant Clayton Montez, Security Officer Contents 4 Preface and Acknowledgements Curtis L. Carter, Director Haggerty Museum of Art 7 Raymond F. Piper, Collector Annemarie Sawkins, Associate Curator Haggerty Museum of Art 11 The Politics of Porcelain Anne Odom, Deputy Director for Collections and Chief Curator Hillwood Museum and Gardens 25 Porcelain and Private Life: The Private Services in the Nineteenth Century Karen L.
  • Nord Stream 2

    Nord Stream 2

    ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES FOR THE RUSSIAN SECTION Nord Stream 2 ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES FOR THE RUSSIAN SECTION Document number W-PE-MSC-LFR-REP-837-RALTEREN-06 Rev. Date Description 01 2016-07-26 02 2016-11-09 03 2016-11-05 04 2016-12-21 05 2017-03-29 06 2017-04-04 FRECOM LLC 1 W-PE-MSC-LFR-REP-837-RALTEREN-06 ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES FOR THE RUSSIAN SECTION Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary 5 2 Introduction 6 2.1 Project History 6 2.2 Objectives of the Report 7 2.3 Technical characteristics of the proposed pipeline system 8 2.3.1 Construction 10 2.3.2 Operational aspects 10 2.3.3 Decommissioning 10 2.4 Regulatory basis for the alternative assessment 11 2.5 Methodology of the Assessment of Alternatives 12 3 Stage 1. Bundling of Nord Stream 2 with the Nord Stream pipeline system 14 3.1 Inland routing 14 3.2 Construction of a compressor station 15 3.3 Pipeline landfall 15 4 Stage 2. Selecting areas on the southern coast of the Gulf of Finland 17 4.1 Section 1: Saint Petersburg – Sosnovy Bor 17 4.1.1 Dense residential development along the coastline 18 4.1.2 Historical and cultural sites of global importance 19 4.1.3 Saint Petersburg flood defences 19 4.1.4 Presence of special conservation areas 21 4.1.5 Complex coastal geological conditions 22 4.1.6 Proximity to navigation channels 23 4.1.7 Conclusion on the feasibility of using Section 1 24 4.2 Section 2: Sosnovy Bor - Ust-Luga 24 4.2.1 Coastal development 25 4.2.2 The Leningrad nuclear power plant and associated complex of hazardous processes and facilities 25 4.2.3 Existing and proposed SCAs and IBAs 26 4.2.4 Restricted areas offshore 29 4.2.5 Complex coastal geological conditions 29 4.2.6 Proximity to the port of Ust-Luga and its shipping routes 30 4.2.7 Conclusion on the feasibility of using Section 2 30 4.3 Section 3 Ust-Luga - Russian-Estonian border 30 4.3.1 Presence of special conservation areas 31 4.3.2 Conclusion on the feasibility of using Section 3 34 4.4 Conclusions of Stage 2 34 5 Stage 3.
  • Boat Conference Organized by the U.N

    Boat Conference Organized by the U.N

    Copiesavellshie from: SeeGrant Extension Program 6022 MoCartyHall Universityof Florida Gslnssvlila,F I.3281 1 PletW.SseOrant Cogsge le supportedhy awed of the Officeof SeeOrant, NationalOceania aad AtrnoepherieAdmlnletradon, U4. Depert- raentef Cetmmrm,grant nwahw NAESAA-~, underprovisions of the Natkmef8ee GrantCogege and ProgramsAot of 1888. This hdenaatlaals pehlldtedhy the SeeOrant Eatenekm Proipam wideh funatlons as ~ componentof the Florida CooperativeEatenslon Ssrvtse. JehuT. ggaeste,dom, In mmduetlngCoeperadve Extension work in Agriculture.Home Eoonomies, and ggerineSeieneee. State of Fkrride.U.S. gttpartnrsntef Agrharlture,UA Qspartmentof Commerse,and Soerdeof County Commiesloasm,cooperating. printed end dlstrlhutedIn ferdsemnseof the Acts of CengrWsof Stay 8 aadJune 1 1,1814. The Florida See Orant College h anEqual Employment Opportunity-Affirme- ~ eeAetkm employeraatharlmd m 'yrow4h~h, edaoatloaalkrformadon and other earvtaeeonly to individualsand InstNutlomthat ~ aoettenwithout Nacrd ta ress,eaktr, eea, or nationalorigin. I NTERNATIQNAL CONFERENCE DN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION,AND OPERATIONOF COMMERCIAL F I SHING VESSELS Sponsored By: Florida Sea Grant College Program Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Southeast Section Florida Institute of Technology College of Science and Engineering: OceanEngineering Program Held At: Florida Institute of Technology Edi ted By: John C. Sainsbury Thomas M. Leahy Sea Grant Project No. IR/84-6 Grant No. NA 80AA-D-00038 Report Number 67 Florida Sea Grant College May 1985 Price: $10.00 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SPONSORS: Florida Sea Grant College Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Southeast Section Florida Institute of Technology, College of Engineering: OceanEngineering Program CONFERENCEGENERAL CHAIRMAN: Dr. JohnC. Sainsbury,Professor Chairman, Ocean Engineering Program, Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, Florida 32901, USA CDGRDI NATI NG COMMITTEE: Tom Col 't ins, Desco.
  • The Russian Sale New Bond Street, London | 28 November 2018

    The Russian Sale New Bond Street, London | 28 November 2018

    The Russian Sale New Bond Street, London | 28 November 2018 Bonhams 1793 Limited Bonhams International Board Bonhams UK Ltd Directors Registered No. 4326560 Malcolm Barber Co-Chairman, Colin Sheaf Chairman, Gordon McFarlan, Andrew McKenzie, Registered Office: Montpelier Galleries Colin Sheaf Deputy Chairman, Harvey Cammell Deputy Chairman, Simon Mitchell, Jeff Muse, Mike Neill, Montpelier Street, London SW7 1HH Matthew Girling CEO, Emily Barber, Antony Bennett, Charlie O’Brien, Giles Peppiatt, India Phillips, Patrick Meade Group Vice Chairman, Matthew Bradbury, Lucinda Bredin, Peter Rees, John Sandon, Tim Schofield, +44 (0) 20 7393 3900 Asaph Hyman, Caroline Oliphant, Simon Cottle, Andrew Currie, Veronique Scorer, Robert Smith, James Stratton, +44 (0) 20 7393 3905 fax Edward Wilkinson, Geoffrey Davies, James Knight, Charles Graham-Campbell, Matthew Haley, Ralph Taylor, Charlie Thomas, David Williams, Jon Baddeley, Jonathan Fairhurst, Leslie Wright, Richard Harvey, Robin Hereford, Michael Wynell-Mayow, Suzannah Yip. Rupert Banner, Shahin Virani, Simon Cottle. Charles Lanning, Grant MacDougall, The Russian Sale New Bond Street, London | Wednesday 28 November 2018 at 3pm BONHAMS BIDS ENQUIRIES ILLUSTRATIONS 101 New Bond Street +44 (0) 20 7447 7447 London Front cover: Lot 29 London W1S 1SR +44 (0) 20 7447 7401 fax Daria Khristova Back cover: Lot 80 (detail) To bid via the internet please visit +44 (0) 20 7468 8338 Inside front: Lot 13 www.bonhams.com www.bonhams.com [email protected] Inside back: Lot 43 Opposite page: Lot 33 VIEWING Please provide details of the Cynthia Coleman Sparke Sunday 25 November lots on which you wish to place +44 (0) 20 7468 8357 To submit a claim for refund of 11am to 3pm bids at least 24 hours prior to [email protected] VAT, HMRC require lots to be Monday 26 November the sale.