Activation of the Cytotactin Promoter by the Homeobox-Containing Gene

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Activation of the Cytotactin Promoter by the Homeobox-Containing Gene Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 89, pp. 2091-2095, March 1992 Developmental Biology Activation of the cytotactin promoter by the homeobox-containing gene Evx-1 (morphogenesis/extracellular matrix/phorbol 12-O-tetradecanoate 13-acetate response element/homeodomain/growth factors) FREDERICK S. JONES*, GEORGES CHALEPAKISt, PETER GRUSSt, AND GERALD M. EDELMAN* *Laboratory of Developmental and Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021; and tDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, 3400 Gottingen, Federal Republic of Germany Contributed by Gerald M. Edelman, December 17, 1991 ABSTRACT Cytotactin is a morphoregulatory molecule of during development in place-dependent patterns that corre- the extracellular matrix affecting cell shape, division, and spond to morphologically significant boundaries (3-6). Cy- migration that appears in a characteristic and complex site- totactin has been shown to affect a variety of processes restricted pattern during embryogenesis. The promoter region including cell spreading or rounding, adhesion and repulsion, of the gene that encodes chicken cytotactin contains a variety and neurite retraction; it can also modulate mitogenesis (4, of potential regulatory sequences. These include putative bind- 7-14). The multifunctionality ofthe molecule may reside in its ing sites for homeodomain proteins and a phorbol 12-0- modular structure (10, 15-19) that contains many indepen- tetradecanoate 13-acetate response element (TRE)/AP-1 ele- dent binding domains. A key question is how the site- ment, a potential target for transcription factors thought to be restricted expression ofcytotactin is genetically controlled in involved in growth-factor signal transduction. To determine a fashion sufficient to assure normal morphogenesis. Ho- the effects of homeobox-containing genes on cytotactin pro- meobox-containing genes appear to be excellent candidates moter activity, we conducted a series of cotransfection exper- for the control of such morphoregulatory molecules, given iments on NIH 3T3 cells using cytotactin promoter- the evidence that they affect neighborhood-specific develop- chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene con- mental patterns in various embryonic axes (20-24). We have structs and plasmids driving the expression ofmouse homeobox described (25) modulation of the expression of N-CAM, the genes Evx-1 and Hox-1.3. Cotransfection withEvx-1 stimulated neural cell adhesion molecule, by Hox genes. The presence cytotactin promoter activity whereas cotransfection in control of sequence motifs resembling homeodomain binding sites in experiments with Hox-1.3 had no effect. To localize the se- the 5' flanking sequence of the cytotactin gene prompted us quences required for Evx-1 activation, we tested a series of to examine cytotactin in a similar fashion. deletions in the cytotactin promoter. An 89-base-pair region We report here that Evx-J, a mouse homeobox gene most containing a consensus TRE/AP-1 element was found to be related to the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve) from Dro- required for activation. An oligonucleotide segment containing sophila melanogaster (26), induces the expression in NIH this TRE/AP-1 site was found to confer Evx-l inducibility on 3T3 cells of a chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) re- a simian virus 40 minimal promoter; mutation of the porter gene driven by the chicken cytotactin promoter. TRE/AP-1 site abolished this activity. To explore the potential Deletion analysis performed on the cytotactin promoter role of growth factors in cytotactin promoter activation, region localized the sequences that contributed to the acti- chicken embryo fibroblasts, which are known to synthesize vation to an 89-base-pair (bp) segment containing a phorbol cytotactin, were frnst transfected with cytotactin promoter 12-O-tetradecanoate 13-acetate response element (TRE)/ constructs and cultured under minimal conditions in 1% fetal AP-1 element. This control element has been shown to be a bovine serum. Although the cells exhibited only low levels of target for transcription factors encoded by the fos and jun CAT activity under these conditions, cells exposed for 12 h to gene families (27-29). Mutation of the TRE/AP-1 sequence 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum showed a marked increase in abolished the ability of Evx-J to activate the promoter. The CAT activity. Cotransfection with Evx-1 and cytotactin pro- TRE/AP-1 element was also required to drive expression of moter constructs of cells cultured in 1% fetal bovine serum was the CAT reporter gene in chicken embryo fibroblasts, cells sufficient, however, to produce high levels of CAT activity. known to synthesize cytotactin. Furthermore, transfection These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that Evx-1, a with Evx-J obviated the requirement for the higher concen- homeobox-containing gene, may activate the cytotactin pro- tration of serum otherwise necessary to activate cytotactin moter by a mechanism involving a growth-factor signal trans- promoter constructs containing the TRE/AP-1 site. duction pathway. More generally, the results support the These results, along with those obtained with the N-CAM hypothesis that the place-dependent expression of morphoreg- promoter (25), provide support for the hypothesis that the ulatory molecules may depend upon local cues provided by expression ofmorphoregulatory molecules may be controlled homeobox genes and their encoded proteins. by homeobox gene products. In addition, they raise the possibility that the cytotactin promoter modulation by Evx-J During development, metamorphosis, and regeneration, a may involve a growth-factor signal transduction pathway. number of different morphoregulatory molecules mediating cell and substrate adhesion and junction formation are ex- pressed in defined sequences (1). These molecules act to MATERIALS AND METHODS regulate primary cellular processes such as movement, divi- CAT gene reporter plasmids were constructed in BSCAT, a sion, and cell-cell communication in a place-dependent fash- Bluescript vector (Stratagene) containing a 1.8-kilobase CAT ion (2). A remarkable example of such a molecule is cyto- gene, and also in commercially available pCAT-Basic and tactin/tenascin, an extracellular matrix protein that appears pCAT-Promoter vectors (Promega). Restriction fragments The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge Abbreviations: CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; SV40, sim- payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" ian virus 40; CMV, cytomegalovirus; TRE, phorbol 12-0- in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. tetradecanoate 13-acetate response element. 2091 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 2092 Developmental Biology: Jones et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 (1992) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Mouse homeobox genes Evx-J and Hox-1.3 were inserted into cytomegalovirus (CMV) and 83-actin promoter vectors, respectively. In cotransfection experiments, these plasmids, designated CMV-Evx-1 and fBA-Hox-1.3, were used as pro- S.0*.. 0 ducers ofthe homeodomain proteins in situ. Test DNAs were -* f transfected into cells with Bluescript carrier DNA, as de- scribed (25). NIH 3T3 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10%o (vol/vol) * @[email protected]. calf serum. Chicken embryo fibroblasts were prepared from 11-day body walls as described (31). Transfectants were harvested 36-72 h after transfection and assayed for CAT activity. Cells were cotransfected with 5 jg of RSV-f3- galactosidase plasmid DNA and extracts were normalized for FIG. 1. Activation of cytotactin promoter activity in NIH 3T3 internal fB-galactosidase activity as described (25). DNase I cells after cotransfection with Evx-1. NIH 3T3 cells were cotrans- footprinting was performed using the fushi tarazu (ftz) ho- fected with 10 ,ug of reporter gene plasmid and with various amounts meodomain protein as described (32). of homeobox gene expression plasmids. Cells were harvested 72 h after transfection and assayed for CAT activity. Reporter plasmids for cotransfections were added as follows: CTP7-CAT (lanes 1-9), RESULTS BSCAT (lanes 10 and 11), and SV40 promoter/enhancer-BSCAT (lane 12). Homeobox gene expression plasmids were transfected in Activation of the Cytotactin Promoter by Evx-1. To test the following concentrations. CMV-Evx-1, 1 jg (lane 2), 2 ,ug (lane whether Evx-1 or Hox-1.3 genes could affect the activity of 3), 5 ,ug (lane 4), and 10 ,ug (lanes 5 and 10); ,BA-Hox-1.3, 1 ,ug (lane the cytotactin promoter, NIH 3T3 cells were cotransfected 6), 2 ,ug (lane 7), 5 ug (lane 8), and 10 ,ug (lanes 9 and 11). with the cytotactin promoter-CAT reporter gene plasmid CTP7-CAT and either the CMV-Evx-l or the /BA-Hox-1.3 from the 5' end and upstream flanking region of the chicken expression plasmids and were then assayed for CAT activity. cytotactin gene that were used to prepare reporter constructs Cells transfected with CMV-Evx-l had significant CAT ac- were derived from plasmids as described (30). Reporter tivity driven by the cytotactin promoter (Fig. 1, compare constructs were designated according to the cytotactin pro- lanes 2-5 to lane 1) but controls transfected with Hox-1.3 moter segments used; the numbers in parentheses refer to showed no detectable CAT activity (Fig. 1, compare lanes positions either upstream (-) or downstream (+) from the 6-9 to lane 1). site of transcription initiation. Reporters used in this study Analysis ofthe Cis Sequences Required forEvx-1 Activation. (-3986 to +374), CTP12-CAT To define further the regions of the cytotactin promoter that were as follows: CTP7-CAT were critical for Evx-1 activation, cytotactin promoter dele- (-1477 to -201), CTP4-CAT (-1312 to +270), CTP3-CAT tion constructs (Fig. 2) were tested for their ability to be (-936 to +121), CTP2-CAT (-289 to +374), and CTP14- activated by CMV-Evx-l after cotransfection in NIH 3T3 CAT (-201 to +121). In addition, one or two copies of a cells.
Recommended publications
  • KLF2 Induced
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The transcription factor KLF2 in vascular biology Boon, R.A. Publication date 2008 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Boon, R. A. (2008). The transcription factor KLF2 in vascular biology. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:23 Sep 2021 Supplementary data: Genes induced by KLF2 Dekker et al. LocusLink Accession Gene Sequence Description Fold p-value ID number symbol change (FDR) 6654 AK022099 SOS1 cDNA FLJ12037 fis, clone HEMBB1001921. 100.00 5.9E-09 56999 AF086069 ADAMTS9 full length insert cDNA clone YZ35C05. 100.00 1.2E-09 6672 AF085934 SP100 full length insert cDNA clone YR57D07. 100.00 6.7E-13 9031 AF132602 BAZ1B Williams Syndrome critical region WS25 mRNA, partial sequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Homeobox Gene Expression Profile in Human Hematopoietic Multipotent
    Leukemia (2003) 17, 1157–1163 & 2003 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0887-6924/03 $25.00 www.nature.com/leu Homeobox gene expression profile in human hematopoietic multipotent stem cells and T-cell progenitors: implications for human T-cell development T Taghon1, K Thys1, M De Smedt1, F Weerkamp2, FJT Staal2, J Plum1 and G Leclercq1 1Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; and 2Department of Immunology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Class I homeobox (HOX) genes comprise a large family of implicated in this transformation proces.14 The HOX-C locus transcription factors that have been implicated in normal and has been primarily implicated in lymphomas.15 malignant hematopoiesis. However, data on their expression or function during T-cell development is limited. Using degener- Hematopoietic cells are derived from stem cells that reside in ated RT-PCR and Affymetrix microarray analysis, we analyzed fetal liver (FL) in the embryo and in the adult bone marrow the expression pattern of this gene family in human multipotent (ABM), which have the unique ability to self-renew and thereby stem cells from fetal liver (FL) and adult bone marrow (ABM), provide a life-long supply of blood cells. T lymphocytes are a and in T-cell progenitors from child thymus. We show that FL specific type of hematopoietic cells that play a major role in the and ABM stem cells are similar in terms of HOX gene immune system. They develop through a well-defined order of expression, but significant differences were observed between differentiation steps in the thymus.16 Several transcription these two cell types and child thymocytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Angiogenic Patterning by STEEL, an Endothelial-Enriched Long
    Angiogenic patterning by STEEL, an endothelial- enriched long noncoding RNA H. S. Jeffrey Mana,b, Aravin N. Sukumara,b, Gabrielle C. Lamc,d, Paul J. Turgeonb,e, Matthew S. Yanb,f, Kyung Ha Kub,e, Michelle K. Dubinskya,b, J. J. David Hob,f, Jenny Jing Wangb,e, Sunit Dasg,h, Nora Mitchelli, Peter Oettgeni, Michael V. Seftonc,d,j, and Philip A. Marsdena,b,e,f,1 aInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada; bKeenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5B 1T8, Canada; cDonnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E2, Canada; dInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada; eDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada; fDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada; gArthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Institute, Hospital for SickKids, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada; hDivision of Neurosurgery and Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada; iDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; and jDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E5, Canada Edited by Napoleone Ferrara, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, and approved January 24, 2018 (received for review August 28, 2017) Endothelial cell (EC)-enriched protein coding genes, such as endothelial formation in vitro and blood vessel formation in vivo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gli2 Transcription Factor Is Required for Normal Mouse Mammary Gland Development
    Developmental Biology 238, 133–144 (2001) doi:10.1006/dbio.2001.0410, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on The Gli2 Transcription Factor Is Required for Normal Mouse Mammary Gland Development Michael T. Lewis,*,1,2 Sarajane Ross,*,3 Phyllis A. Strickland,* Charles W. Sugnet,* Elsa Jimenez,* Chi-chung Hui,† and Charles W. Daniel* *Department of Biology, Sinsheimer Laboratories, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064; and †The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada The hedgehog signal transduction network performs critical roles in mediating cell–cell interactions during embryogenesis and organogenesis. Loss-of-function or misexpression mutation of hedgehog network components can cause birth defects, skin cancer, and other tumors. The Gli gene family (Gli1, Gli2, and Gli3) encodes zinc finger transcription factors that act as mediators of hedgehog signal transduction. In this study, we investigate the role of Gli2 in mammary gland development. Mammary expression of Gli2 is developmentally regulated in a tissue compartment-specific manner. Expression is exclusively stromal during virgin stages of development but becomes both epithelial and stromal during pregnancy and lactation. The null phenotype with respect to both ductal and alveolar development was examined by transplantation rescue of embryonic mammary glands into physiologically normal host females. Glands derived from both wild type and null embryo donors showed ductal outgrowths that developed to equivalent extents in virgin hosts. However, in null transplants, ducts were frequently distended or irregularly shaped and showed a range of histological alterations similar to micropap- illary ductal hyperplasias in the human breast. Alveolar development during pregnancy was not overtly affected by loss of Gli2 function.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Figure 1 Supplemental Figure 1. Flow Cytometry
    Supplemental Figure 1 Initial neutrophil isolation sample Single cells Live 83.4% 99.6% 99.1% W - SC SC S S FSC FSC FSC-H Live/ dead CD45 positive 100% SC S CD16 PE cy7 CD16 CD45+ CD16+ CD66b+ neutrophils 98.1% CD45 V500 CD16 PerCP cy5.5 Supplemental Figure 1. Flow cytometry with gating strategey depicted confirms 98.1% purity of CD66b/CD16 double positive neutrophils. Supplemental Figure 1. Flow cytometry with gating strategy depicted confirms 98.1% purity of CD66b/CD16 double positive neutrophils. (a) (b) Supplemental Figure 2 A. B. (c) (d) -2000 bp 0 2000bp Position relative to TSS Supplemental Fig 2. a) No response to CpG in qRTPCR. b) Healthy volunteer neutrophils do not produce NETs via sytox green assay in response to pathogen ligands at 1 hour or immediately following live organism challenge supporting this time point for ATAC-seq. (PMA is a positive control)Supplemental(ligand donors Fign=4ure, live 2organism. A. Representativedonors n=2) c) Representative QC plots demonstratingQC plots demonstrating librarylibrary prepprep resultsresults inin expected insert size expecteddistribution and insertd) reads sizeare distributionenriched around andtranscription B. readsstart aresites enriched(TSS). around transcription start sites (TSS). Supplemental Figure 3. LTA BGP LPS HMGB1 FLAG E. coli R848 S. aureus Supplemental Fig 3. Quality control for DiffBind method of identification of differentially accessible regions of chromatin. Correlation heat maps and principal component analysis (PCA) of differentially accessible chromatin. We found that for any given challenge across donors, stimulated samples cluster together, control samples cluster Supplementaltogether, and the stimulated Figandurecontrol 3.cluster Qualityaway from controleach other, forsuggesting DiffBindhigh quality methoddata and accessibleof identificationchromatin region ofidentification differentiallythat allows for analysis accessibleof four healthy donor regionsdata.
    [Show full text]
  • Drosophila Pax6 Promotes Development of the Entire Eye-Antennal Disc, Thereby Ensuring Proper Adult Head Formation
    PAPER Drosophila Pax6 promotes development of the entire COLLOQUIUM eye-antennal disc, thereby ensuring proper adult head formation Jinjin Zhua, Sneha Palliyila, Chen Ranb, and Justin P. Kumara,1 aDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405; and bDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 Edited by Ellen V. Rothenberg, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Neil H. Shubin February 17, 2017 (received for review July 26, 2016) Paired box 6 (Pax6) is considered to be the master control gene for molecular battle among GRNs allows for the subdivision of the eye development in all seeing animals studied so far. In vertebrates, eye-antennal disc to be maintained within a single continuous it is required not only for lens/retina formation but also for the cellular field (13–16). Of the GRNs that are known to operate development of the CNS, olfactory system, and pancreas. Although within the eye-antennal disc, the retinal determination (RD) Pax6 plays important roles in cell differentiation, proliferation, and network, which controls eye development, is the best studied (17). patterning during the development of these systems, the underlying At the core of the RD network lie the Paired box 6 (Pax6) genes mechanism remains poorly understood. In the fruit fly, Drosophila eyeless (ey)andtwin of eyeless (toy), the SIX family member sine melanogaster, Pax6 also functions in a range of tissues, including oculis (so), the transcriptional coactivator eyes absent (eya), and the the eye and brain. In this report, we describe the function of Pax6 in Ski/Sno family member dachshund (dac)(17).
    [Show full text]
  • The NANOG Transcription Factor Induces Type 2 Deiodinase Expression and Regulates the Intracellular Activation of Thyroid Hormone in Keratinocyte Carcinomas
    Cancers 2020, 12 S1 of S18 Supplementary Materials: The NANOG Transcription Factor Induces Type 2 Deiodinase Expression and Regulates the Intracellular Activation of Thyroid Hormone in Keratinocyte Carcinomas Annarita Nappi, Emery Di Cicco, Caterina Miro, Annunziata Gaetana Cicatiello, Serena Sagliocchi, Giuseppina Mancino, Raffaele Ambrosio, Cristina Luongo, Daniela Di Girolamo, Maria Angela De Stefano, Tommaso Porcelli, Mariano Stornaiuolo and Monica Dentice Figure S1. Strategy for the mutagenesis of Dio2 promoter. (A) Schematic representation of NANOG Binding Site within the Dio2 promoter region. (B) Schematic diagram for site‐directed mutagenesis of NANOG Binding Site on Dio2 promoter region by Recombinant PCR. (C) Representation of the mutated NANOG Binding Site on Dio2 promoter region. (D) Electropherogram of the NANOG Binding Site mutation within the Dio2 promoter. Cancers 2020, 12 S2 of S18 Figure S2. Strategy for the silencing of NANOG expression. (A) Cloning strategies for the generation of NANOG shRNA expression vectors. (B) Electropherograms of the NANOG shRNA sequences cloned into pcDNA3.1 vector. (C) Validation of effective NANOG down-modulation by two different NANOG shRNA vectors was assessed by Western Blot analysis of NANOG expression in BCC cells. (D) Quantification of NANOG protein levels versus Tubulin levels in the same experiment as in C is represented by histograms. Cancers 2020, 12 S3 of S18 Figure S3. The CD34+ cells are characterized by the expression of typical epithelial stemness genes. The mRNA levels of a panel of indicated stemness markers of epidermis were measured by Real Time PCR in the same experiment indicated in figure 3F and G. Cancers 2020, 12 S4 of S18 Figure S4.
    [Show full text]
  • TP53 9606.ENSP00000269305 Tumor Protein P53; Acts As a Tumor
    TP53 9606.ENSP00000269305 tumor protein p53; Acts as a tumor suppressor in many tumor types; induces growth arrest or apoptosis depending on the physiological circumstances and cell type. Involved in cell cycle regulation as a trans-activator that acts to negatively regulate cell division by controlling a set of genes required for this process. One of the activated genes is an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases. Apoptosis induction seems to be mediated either by stimulation of BAX and FAS antigen expression, or by repression of Bcl-2 expression. Implicated in Notch signaling cross-over TAF1 9606.ENSP00000276072 TAF1 RNA polymerase II, TATA box binding protein (TBP)-associated factor, 250kDa; Largest component and core scaffold of the TFIID basal transcription factor complex. Contains novel N- and C-terminal Ser/Thr kinase domains which can autophosphorylate or transphosphorylate other transcription factors. Phosphorylates TP53 on 'Thr-55' which leads to MDM2-mediated degradation of TP53. Phosphorylates GTF2A1 and GTF2F1 on Ser residues. Possesses DNA- binding activity. Essential for progression of the G1 phase of the cell cycle SUMO2 9606.ENSP00000405965 SMT3 suppressor of mif two 3 homolog 2 (S. cerevisiae); Ubiquitin-like protein which can be covalently attached to target lysines either as a monomer or as a lysine-linked polymer. Does not seem to be involved in protein degradation and may function as an antagonist of ubiquitin in the degradation process. Plays a role in a number of cellular processes such as nuclear transport, DNA
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Transcription Factor Prospero Homeobox 1 on the Regulation of Thyroid Cancer Malignancy
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review The Impact of Transcription Factor Prospero Homeobox 1 on the Regulation of Thyroid Cancer Malignancy Magdalena Rudzi ´nska 1,2 and Barbara Czarnocka 1,* 1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 2 Institute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-225693812; Fax: +48-225693712 Received: 7 April 2020; Accepted: 30 April 2020; Published: 2 May 2020 Abstract: Transcription factor Prospero homeobox 1 (PROX1) is continuously expressed in the lymphatic endothelial cells, playing an essential role in their differentiation. Many reports have shown that PROX1 is implicated in cancer development and acts as an oncoprotein or suppressor in a tissue-dependent manner. Additionally, the PROX1 expression in many types of tumors has prognostic significance and is associated with patient outcomes. In our previous experimental studies, we showed that PROX1 is present in the thyroid cancer (THC) cells of different origins and has a high impact on follicular thyroid cancer (FTC) phenotypes, regulating migration, invasion, focal adhesion, cytoskeleton reorganization, and angiogenesis. Herein, we discuss the PROX1 transcript and protein structures, the expression pattern of PROX1 in THC specimens, and its epigenetic regulation. Next, we emphasize the biological processes and genes regulated by PROX1 in CGTH-W-1 cells, derived from squamous cell carcinoma of the thyroid gland. Finally, we discuss the interaction of PROX1 with other lymphatic factors. In our review, we aimed to highlight the importance of vascular molecules in cancer development and provide an update on the functionality of PROX1 in THC biology regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • DLX Genes: Roles in Development and Cancer
    cancers Review DLX Genes: Roles in Development and Cancer Yinfei Tan 1,* and Joseph R. Testa 1,2,* 1 Genomics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA 2 Cancer Signaling and Epigenetics Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.T.); [email protected] (J.R.T.) Simple Summary: DLX homeobox family genes encode transcription factors that have indispensable roles in embryonic and postnatal development. These genes are critically linked to the morphogene- sis of craniofacial structures, branchial arches, forebrain, and sensory organs. DLX genes are also involved in postnatal homeostasis, particularly hematopoiesis and, when dysregulated, oncogen- esis. DLX1/2, DLX3/4, and DLX5/6 exist as bigenes on different chromosomes, sharing intergenic enhancers between gene pairs, which allows orchestrated spatiotemporal expression. Genomic alterations of human DLX gene enhancers or coding sequences result in congenital disorders such as split-hand/foot malformation. Aberrant postnatal expression of DLX genes is associated with hematological malignancies, including leukemias and lymphomas. In several mouse models of T-cell lymphoma, Dlx5 has been shown to act as an oncogene by cooperating with activated Akt, Notch1/3, and/or Wnt to drive tumor formation. In humans, DLX5 is aberrantly expressed in lung and ovarian carcinomas and holds promise as a therapeutic target. Abstract: Homeobox genes control body patterning and cell-fate decisions during development. The homeobox genes consist of many families, only some of which have been investigated regarding a possible role in tumorigenesis. Dysregulation of HOX family genes have been widely implicated in cancer etiology.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement. Transcriptional Factors (TF), Protein Name and Their Description Or Function
    Supplement. Transcriptional factors (TF), protein name and their description or function. TF Protein name TF description/function ARID3A AT rich interactive domain 3A (BRIGHT-like) This gene encodes a member of the ARID (AT-rich interaction domain) family of DNA binding proteins. ATF4 Activating Transcription Factor 4 Transcriptional activator. Binds the cAMP response element (CRE) (consensus: 5-GTGACGT[AC][AG]-3), a sequence present in many viral and cellular promoters. CTCF CCCTC-Binding Factor Chromatin binding factor that binds to DNA sequence specific sites. Involved in transcriptional regulation by binding to chromatin insulators and preventing interaction between promoter and nearby enhancers and silencers. The protein can bind a histone acetyltransferase (HAT)-containing complex and function as a transcriptional activator or bind a histone deacetylase (HDAC)-containing complex and function as a transcriptional repressor. E2F1-6 E2F transcription factors 1-6 The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the E2F family of transcription factors. The E2F family plays a crucial role in the control of cell cycle and action of tumor suppressor proteins and is also a target of the transforming proteins of small DNA tumor viruses. The E2F proteins contain several evolutionally conserved domains found in most members of the family. These domains include a DNA binding domain, a dimerization domain which determines interaction with the differentiation regulated transcription factor proteins (DP), a transactivation domain enriched in acidic amino acids, and a tumor suppressor protein association domain which is embedded within the transactivation domain. EBF1 Transcription factor COE1 EBF1 has been shown to interact with ZNF423 and CREB binding proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Independent and Interactive DNA-Binding Subdomains of the Pax6 Paired Domain Are Regulated by Alternative Splicing
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 8, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Two independent and interactive DNA-binding subdomains of the Pax6 paired domain are regulated by alternative splicing Jonathan A. Epstein, 1'2 Tom Glaser, 2 Jiexing Cai, 2 Lisa Jepeal, 2 David S. Walton, 3 and Richard L. Maas 2"4 Divisions of Cardiology~ and Genetics2, Department of Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, a Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 USA Vertebrate Pax proteins share a conserved 128-amino-acid DNA-binding motif, the paired domain. The PAX6 gene, which is mutated in the routine Small eye and human aniridia developmental defects, also encodes a second protein with a 14-amino-acid insertion in the paired domain. This protein, which arises by alternative mRNA splicing, exhibits unique DNA-binding properties. Unlike other paired domains, which bind DNA predominantly by their amino termini, the extended Pax6 paired domain interacts with DNA exclusively through its carboxyl terminus. This property can be simulated by deletion of 30 amino-terminal residues from the Pax6 or Pax2 paired domains. Thus, the insertion acts as a molecular toggle to unmask the DNA-binding potential of the carboxyl terminus. The functional nonequivalence of the two Pax6 proteins is underscored by a T ~ C mutation at position -3 of the alternative splice acceptor site that changes the ratio of the two isoforms and causes a distinct human ocular syndrome. [Key Words: Pax genes; transcription factor; alternative mRNA splicing; DNA binding; ocular development; aniridia] Received May 17, 1994; revised version accepted July 18, 1994.
    [Show full text]