DOCSLIB.ORG

Common and Issues and Pro/Con Arguments in Elections to Change

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Common and Issues and Pro/Con Arguments in Elections to Change Common Issues and Pro/Con Arguments in Elections to Change Form of Government What are some of the most common issues and arguments pro and con that have come up in elections to change forms of government? In our experience, the most common issues revolve around: . Responsiveness and accountability – which form will be the most responsive? . Professional management – which form provides the best quality of management? . The appropriate role of politics in administration – should politics be removed from administration? . Effectiveness and efficiency – which form produces the most efficient and effective management? . Political harmony (an oxymoron?) – which form produces greater harmony and less divisiveness? These “arguments” have been collected from a variety of sources and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of MRSC or MRSC Staff. Arguments For the Mayor-Council Form . This is the form that is familiar to most Americans because it is patterned after our traditional national and state governments. There is a separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches. There are checks and balances. The council can refuse to confirm the mayor's appointments and the mayor can veto the council's legislation. Also separation of powers provides healthy independence, debate and creative tension. Separate legislative and executive branches provide the best opportunity for debate and consensus building. By electing, rather than appointing a mayor, political leadership is established. The city has a political spokesperson who has a high degree of visibility. Some argue that an elected mayor will have a higher standing and greater voice in regional affairs of the city . The mayor is vested with the veto power and can serve as a check on an unpopular council decision . A skilled administrator can be hired to minimize weaknesses in the mayor's management background or experience, but the mayor is still fully responsible. (This refers to the appointment of a CAO and the addition of professional expertise to the mayor's office) Arguments Against the Mayor-Council Form . The office of the mayor gives too much power and authority to one person. It permits an incumbent to make decisions based largely on political considerations, and to use the office to further personal political objectives . They also point out that the qualities needed to win an election are not the same qualities needed to manage a modern city. A mayor, while politically astute, may not always possess the necessary management training and experience. If an elected mayor proves to be incompetent or worse, he/she cannot be removed until the end of their term, or after an expensive and divisive recall election. A separately elected mayor may resist requests from the council. The mayor may attempt to isolate the council by controlling staff, information, and reports. Arguments For the Council-Manager Form . Administration of city business is removed from politics . Efficiency of profesional management based on a business model also the familiar model of school board to school superintendent relationship . Since city managers are appointed rather than elected, greater attention can be given to selecting a qualified manager. The pool of qualified candidates is larger since city managers traditionally are paid better than mayors and since candidates can be recruited from outside the city including a nationwide search. (mayors must be a resident of the city prior to their election). Emphasis is placed on the role of the legislative body and its policy-making function. Council gets better cooperation and information because the city manager is their employee. Since manager serves at the pleasure of the council without a definite term, he/she can be removed at any time, limiting the danger of an abuse of authority. Arguments Against the Council-Manager Form . Critics of the council-manager plan argue the following: . The council-manager form gives too much power to one person - the city manager . A professional manager, often chosen from outside the city, does not know the community and is too far from the voters . Councils may leave too much decision. making to the manager, who is not directly accountable to the public . Without an elected chief executive, the community lacks political leadership . The council-manager form is too much like a business corporation which is not suitable for managing community needs . City managers cost too much, local people could handle the job for less cost . Citizens may be confused about who is in charge. Most expect the mayor to respond to their problems. The mayor has no direct control over the delivery of services and can only change policy through the city council . City managers may leave a city when offered higher salaries and greater responsibilities in other cities .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Government Primer
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT PRIMER Alaska Municipal League Alaskan Local Government Primer Alaska Municipal League The Alaska Municipal League (AML) is a voluntary, Table of Contents nonprofit, nonpartisan, statewide organization of 163 cities, boroughs, and unified municipalities, Purpose of Primer............ Page 3 representing over 97 percent of Alaska's residents. Originally organized in 1950, the League of Alaska Cities............................Pages 4-5 Cities became the Alaska Municipal League in 1962 when boroughs joined the League. Boroughs......................Pages 6-9 The mission of the Alaska Municipal League is to: Senior Tax Exemption......Page 10 1. Represent the unified voice of Alaska's local Revenue Sharing.............Page 11 governments to successfully influence state and federal decision making. 2. Build consensus and partnerships to address Alaska's Challenges, and Important Local Government Facts: 3. Provide training and joint services to strengthen ♦ Mill rates are calculated by directing the Alaska's local governments. governing body to determine the budget requirements and identifying all revenue sources. Alaska Conference of Mayors After the budget amount is reduced by subtracting revenue sources, the residual is the amount ACoM is the parent organization of the Alaska Mu- required to be raised by the property tax.That nicipal League. The ACoM and AML work together amount is divided by the total assessed value and to form a municipal consensus on statewide and the result is identified as a “mill rate”. A “mill” is federal issues facing Alaskan local governments. 1/1000 of a dollar, so the mill rate simply states the amount of tax to be charged per $1,000 of The purpose of the Alaska Conference of Mayors assessed value.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor's Office for People with Disabilities Language Access Implementation Plan 2018
    Mayor’s Office for People with Disabilities Language Access Implementation Plan 2018 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................... 3 1. Agency Mission and Background ......................................................... 3 2. Agency Language Access Policy and Goals ........................................... 4 3. Limited-English Proficient Population Assessment .................................. 5 4. Provision of Language Access Services ................................................ 8 5. Training ........................................................................................... 9 6. Record Keeping and Evaluation ......................................................... 10 7. Resource Analysis and Planning ........................................................ 10 8. Outreach and Public Awareness of Language Access Services ............... 11 9. Language Access Complaints ............................................................ 11 10. Implementation Plan Logistics ........................................................ 12 Introduction This Language Access Plan for the Mayor’s Office for People with Disabilities (MOPD) has been prepared in accordance with Local Law 30 of 2017 and outlines MOPD’s current and planned actions to improve access to programs and services by limited-English proficient (LEP) individuals. The plan is being developed by MOPD along with the Mayor’s Office of Operations and Mayor’s Office of Immigrant Affairs to ensure information
    [Show full text]
  • 19-1189 BP PLC V. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus BP P. L. C. ET AL. v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19–1189. Argued January 19, 2021—Decided May 17, 2021 Baltimore’s Mayor and City Council (collectively City) sued various en- ergy companies in Maryland state court alleging that the companies concealed the environmental impacts of the fossil fuels they promoted. The defendant companies removed the case to federal court invoking a number of grounds for federal jurisdiction, including the federal officer removal statute, 28 U. S. C. §1442. The City argued that none of the defendants’ various grounds for removal justified retaining federal ju- risdiction, and the district court agreed, issuing an order remanding the case back to state court. Although an order remanding a case to state court is ordinarily unreviewable on appeal, Congress has deter- mined that appellate review is available for those orders “remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed pursuant to section 1442 or 1443 of [Title 28].” §1447(d). The Fourth Circuit read this provision to authorize appellate review only for the part of a remand order deciding the §1442 or §1443 removal ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Council-Manager Form of Government
    OVERVIEW OF CITY ORGANIZATION COUNCIL-MANAGER FORM OF GOVERNMENT Dallas’ government has changed and grown - from a mayor and six aldermen, to a commission with a mayor and four commissioners elected at-large, to the present council-manager system that has been in place since 1931. Originally, the council was composed of nine members and the mayor, who was elected by council vote. In 1951, the eight council members and mayor were all elected at- large. The structure changed again in 1968 to 10 council members and the mayor, who were all elected at-large, but eight council members represented specific districts. Later, in 1979, eight council members were elected from single-member districts with two council members and the mayor elected at-large. Our current system began in 1991 with 14 council members elected from single-member districts and a mayor elected at-large. The mayor is elected for four years, and council members are elected for two-year terms. Council members can serve up to four consecutive two-year terms. A mayor’s term is limited to two consecutive four-year terms. Council-manager government combines citizen input-through elected council members- with the professional training and experience of a city manager. The City’s organization under this plan is similar to that of a corporation. The mayor and city council serve as the equivalent of a board of directors. They set the public agenda, adopt policy and laws and appoint the city manager, city auditor, city attorney, and city secretary. In Dallas, the manager oversees City operations with an executive team of assistant city managers, each responsible for various departments.
    [Show full text]
  • Former Mayors of Holland Oral History Interviews
    Hope College Digital Commons @ Hope College Former Mayors of Holland Oral History Interviews 1984 Bosman, Nelson W Oral History Interview: Former Mayors of Holland Hope College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.hope.edu/holland_mayors Part of the Archival Science Commons, and the Oral History Commons Recommended Citation Repository citation: Hope College, "Bosman, Nelson W Oral History Interview: Former Mayors of Holland" (1984). Former Mayors of Holland. Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.hope.edu/holland_mayors/1 Published in: 1984 - Former Mayors of Holland (H88-0234) - Hope College Living Heritage Oral History Project, January 1, 1984. Copyright © 1984 Hope College, Holland, MI. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Oral History Interviews at Digital Commons @ Hope College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Former Mayors of Holland by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Hope College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Mr. Bosman was one of the formet mayor-s which I k.new before this ptoject was initia:ted. We WIt' both serving on the Board of Trustees for the Netherlands Museum. That board is onl! of the ftw which 1 hay' nt on, but it lS but one of m..ny which Mr. Bosman has served. As can be seen on his h.ct sheet, MI'. Bosm,a,n hilS given his time and talents to many organha:tions throughout the YUts. Mr-. Bosman also served fOt a dE'cade as mayol' of Holland {and also had served as a council member- prior to thatl. During his long tenure as top elected official in the city, Holland underwent many changes which directly sh..ped it into what it has become today.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor: Fernando Medina City: Lisbon (Portugal) on Behalf of the Mayor of Lisbon, Mr. Fernando Medina, I Hereby Would Like To
    Mayor: Fernando Medina City: Lisbon (Portugal) On behalf of the Mayor of Lisbon, Mr. Fernando Medina, I hereby would like to convey the measures that the City of Lisbon has been implemented at this present moment to fight this major outbreak: • School-based meals - Students from public schools in Lisbon, in levels A, B and SEN - special education needs / school social action, will continue to receive meals for breakfast, lunch and snacks, during the entire suspension of school activities. • Elderly - Assuring hot meals, personal hygiene and medicines to the four thousand people already supported by the municipality of Lisbon. Delivering support also to those who quarantine. Social support for people in isolation with dedicated telephone contact lines and take advantage of whatsapp to link young people to elderly. Delivering support also to those who were in Day Centers, that have been closed due to this outbreak, as well as all of those people without autonomy to prepare their own meals. • Homelessness – The City has opened two new facilities with all the conditions for applying the quarantine. All the foster centers has contingency plans duly approved, reinforced hygiene measures and isolation places for suspected cases. • Support to professionals from essential services – Together with the Ministry of Education, nine schools in the city are open to welcome the children of professionals in essential services, health, security forces and fire-fighters. • Support and articulation with Lisbon’s Parish Councils – Support to the needy ones, in regard to the purchase of essential goods (Pharmacy and Supermarket), either because they are over 65 years, or just for the reason that they’re chronically ill and/or people in • Solidarity Network - Identification and organization of people available to carry out solidarity tasks with the most vulnerable sectors of the population.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for 2018
    P a g e | 1 ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2018 Lord Mayor of Cork, Councillor Tony Fitzgerald, and Director of the CLRG, Dr Aodh Quinlivan, present a copy of The Freedom of Cork to the Mayor of San Francisco, Mark Farrell, in April 2018. P a g e | 2 CONTENTS Page 1 Cover Page – CLRG Annual Report for 2018 Page 2 Contents Page 3 Director’s Report Page 4 CLRG Advisory Boards and Affiliations Page 5 Guest Lecture by Danny O’Connor Page 6 Cork Business Association Annual Awards Page 7 Launch of Tip O’Neill Annual Lecture Series in Cork and Boston Page 8 Third Annual CLRG Public Lecture Series Page 9 Third Annual CLRG Public Lecture Series Page 10 Third Annual CLRG Public Lecture Series Page 11 RTÉ Brainstorm on Directly Elected Mayors Page 12 Visits to Cork City Hall Page 13 Visits to Cork City Hall Page 14 Cork Delegation to Sister City, San Francisco Page 15 Evening Echo Lord Mayor Special Page 16 Forthcoming Publications – Vindicating Dublin Page 17 Directly Elected Mayors Page 18 ISS21 Seminar on Local Participation Page 19 Council of Europe Appointment Page 20 Atlantic Social Lab International Project The 20th Philip Monahan Memorial Lecture, sponsored by the CLRG, was delivered by Professor Fiona Mackay from the University of Edinburgh. P a g e | 3 DIRECTOR’S REPORT I am delighted to report that 2018 was another fantastic year for UCC’s Centre for Local and Regional Governance. In this 20-page annual report, I hope that you get a sense of the activities of the CLRG and the research in which we are engaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital City Downtown Community Revitalization Levy – Revised Boundary and Revenue Forecasts
    6. 2. That Mayor S. Mandel, on behalf of Capital City City Council, make an application to 2 the Provincial Government Downtown requesting designation of the Capital City Downtown Community Community Revitalization Levy in a regulation. Revitalization Levy Report Revised Boundary and Revenue Forecasts On October 17, 2012, Administration provided a Downtown Arena Update to City Council that included information Recommendations: clarifying the application of a Community Revitalization Levy to fund specific City- 1. That the revised proposed boundary led Catalyst Projects, including the of the Capital City Downtown arena and related infrastructure. Community Revitalization Levy area as shown in Attachment 1 of the Administration indicated that it was not March 5, 2013, Sustainable the intent to dedicate any increase in Development report 2013SHE012, municipal and education property tax be approved. revenue that would accrue naturally 2. That Mayor S. Mandel, on behalf of through the appreciation of already City Council, send a revised existing fully developed property to pay application to the Provincial for Catalyst projects. The presentation Government requesting designation pointed out that the increase in revenue of the Capital City Downtown that is generated by the inflationary Community Revitalization Levy by appreciation of existing properties is way of regulation. essential to the City’s ability to continue to deliver programs and services to the Report Summary entire City. This report provides an update on progress towards completion of the Administration has been engaged in Capital City Downtown Community discussions with the Province about the Revitalization Levy and provides proposed Capital City Downtown direction on the next steps.
    [Show full text]
  • M E M O R a N D
    M EMORANDUM To: City Council; City Manager From: Mary A. Winters, City Attorney; Elizabeth Oshel, Associate City Attorney Re: Drawing Voting Districts Date: June 6, 2017 QUESTION What are the legal requirements for drawing voting districts in the city of Bend? ANSWER The City is bound by the U.S. Constitution, federal Voting Rights Act, and Oregon law in determining how to draw any wards or districts for election of city councilors. Cities may set their own rules for electing their city councils, and drawing districts, because Art. XI, § 2 of the Oregon constitution gives the legal voters of every city power to enact and adopt their own charters, through the home rule provisions of the Oregon Constitution. The City must follow the Oregon Secretary of State’s directive in creating or redrawing voting districts. Traditional principles of districting such as equal population, compactness, and contiguity should be the primary considerations. The racial composition of districts should be considered only if necessary to comply with the Voting Rights Act. 1. Principles of Districting and Oregon State Law Traditional districting principles should be used to draw voting districts. First, districts must be drawn with the goal of equal population. An equal population goal “is a background rule” underlying all other considerations in drawing electoral maps. ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE Page | 1 Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama, __ US __, 125 SCt 1257, 1271 (2015). In addition to equal population, traditional principles of districting include: Compactness, contiguity, respect for political subdivisions or communities defined by actual shared interests, incumbency protection, and political affiliation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark L. Mcdaniel, ICMA - CM
    Candidate Mark L. McDaniel, ICMA - CM Experience Assistant City Manager City of Dallas, TX 2014 – Present • Responsible for a portfolio of departments that is comprised of 2,200 employees, a combined annual operating budget of $775 million, and capital budget of $514 million. • Provide senior executive oversight for water utilities, communications/information systems, watershed management, flood control, and the city’s 311 call center. • Serve as management liaison to the Dallas Parks Department. • Serve as lead staff liaison to City Council Transportation & Trinity River Project Committee. • Established the Dallas Center for Performance Excellence (CPE) to enhance effectiveness and efficiencies within operations organization-wide through deployment and use of tools such as LEAN Six Sigma, the Baldrige framework, ISO 9001, strategic planning, departmental business planning, employee advisory councils, and a new in-house BIG Academy training program. (Currently serving in a dual capacity as director for the CPE.) • Provide guidance for Dallas Water Utilities water resource planning and coordination. • Developed City’s first multi-year street maintenance model, including identification of funding sources and projected impacts to overall street conditions over time. • Lead City’s new internal compliance task force and development/automation of a new integrated management system for performance improvement. • Facilitated the launch of Dallas Data Points, an online dashboard of the city’s major performance metrics. • Engage in regular coordination of transportation, drainage and water projects/issues involving several outside agencies, such as the Texas Department of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Governments, Regional Transportation Council, Dallas Area Rapid Transit, and United States Army Corps of Engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor / Council
    PART 1 The Mayor-Council Act Editorial Note: This part codifies the provisions of the Mayor-Council Act of 1955, adopted by the legislature of Alabama on September 9, 1955, as Act No. 452. The following sections codify Act No. 452 as amended. Article I Adoption of Mayor-Council Form of Government; Election and Term of Council Article II Legal Status; Form of Government; Powers Article III The Council Article IV Mayor Article V Budget Article VI Department of Finance Article VII Succession in Government Article VIII General Provisions Article IX Abandonment of Mayor-Council Form of Government Article X General Statutory Provisions ARTICLE I Adoption of Mayor-Council Form of Government; Election and Term of Council Sec. 1.01 Cities to which act applies. Any city in the State of Alabama, which has a population of more than 300,000, according to the last federal census, or which may hereafter have such population according to any federal or municipal census that may be taken hereafter, may adopt the mayor-council form of government by proceeding in the manner hereinafter in this act provided. (Act No. 452, 9/9/55, amended by Act No. 131, 7/7/65, Sec. 1) Sec. 1.02 Petition for election. The filing of a petition signed by 10 percent or more of the qualified electors of such city, asking that the proposition of the adoption of the mayor-council form of government for such city be submitted to the qualified voters thereof, with the judge of probate of the county in which such city is located, shall mandatorily require an election to be held as herein provided.
    [Show full text]
  • City Manager Executive Search City of Piqua, Ohio Excellent Career Opportunity
    CITY MANAGER EXECUTIVE SEARCH CITY OF PIQUA, OHIO EXCELLENT CAREER OPPORTUNITY This is an excellent opportunity for leadership and community building in an independent Ohio community with strong traditional values and hometown style. Piqua is 25 miles north of Dayton -- a residential, commer- cial and light manufacturing community with a distinctive downtown. It is on the Great Miami River, along the I-75 corridor, north of the I-70 interchange, well connected to the rich and historic culture of Ohio and to national markets. The current City Manager is retiring after forty-five years of public service, the last nine as City Manager of Piqua. The City seeks the best professionals to work in all its management positions and values stable working relationships. MISSION STATEMENT: Serving with Excellence and Integrity. Serving with Excellence and Integrity CITY OF PIQUA CITY MANAGER Page 2 THE PIQUA COMMUNITY The City of Piqua is home to more than 21,000 residents and offers small-town charm with big-city convenience. Piqua is located along I-75 and twenty miles north of I-70 with multiple generations of the same family still living in the community. Piqua has a diverse range of affordable housing options for any lifestyle, including custom built homes, newer subdivisions, workforce housing, plans to increase independent living options for seniors and older homes with grand architecture in the historic neighborhoods surrounding the downtown area. Downtown Piqua provides a welcoming experience for residents and visitors alike with a scale that is larger than expected, including the Post Office, the 5/3 Bank Building and the historic Fort Piqua Plaza framing McCulloch Square in downtown Piqua.
    [Show full text]