<<

a Sc2C2 cluster is included in a D2d-C84 cage (Fig. 2a). Meanwhile, dimetallofullerenes of often reduce the larger cage size by forming a 6 Sc2C2 cluster. As the existence of such a carbide cluster was also proved 7,8 for a diyttrium structure with Y2C2, one asks whether only scandium and metals can form such . Nevertheless the structures isolated so far show that metal carbide endohedral represent a type of endohedral fullerenes with a cluster inside. Cages other than C82 demonstrably also encase the metal carbide inside. Among the multimetallofullerenes, the Sc3@C82 structure was important as the three metal were shown by spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy to be completely equivalent in the position and redox The Recent State of state of each of the scandium ions.9 Furthermore the position of the Endohedral Fullerene Research scandium ions inside the cage can be changed at lower temperatures as by Lothar Dunsch and Shangfeng Yang detected by ESR spectroscopy.10 As the equivalence of the three scandium ions inside the cage seemed ince the last general reviews in cages have been isolated. This group to point to a balanced ordering of them, the field of endohedral fullerenes of multimetallofullerenes considerably it was surprising that in a recent study by Shinohara in 20001 and by extended the scope of the field by S a carbide endohedral fullerene was Akasaka and Nagase in 2002,2 the giving rise to completely new types of proposed by the group of Akasaka.11 variety of endohedral structures has endohedral fullerenes. By NMR spectroscopy the authors have been extended tremendously. With shown that a Sc C @C fullerene may the turn of the millennium the world The Non-IPR World 3 2 80 exist with icosahedral cage symmetry of endohedral fullerenes has changed With the discovery of the (Fig. 2b). In this way the existence of in all respects. The research on the dimetallofullerene, Sc2@C66, it was a five atomic cluster in an endohedral conventional endohedral fullerenes was shown for the first time by Shinohara’s fullerene has been proved. The question predominately focused on structures group that a dimetallo structure is arises as to how large the cluster inside with a single species such as metal sufficient to break the isolated pentagon a fullerene cage can be. Is it a matter of ions encaged in the cage like rule (IPR), which is the stability rule for size or a matter of chemical structure La@C . Such structures have been 82 conventional fullerenes. As the C66 cage which determines the existence of a treated as a special type of a closed cannot form any IPR structure, there cluster inside the fullerene cage? intercalation compound characterized are fused pentagons in the non-IPR C66 by a doping process in which the 3 (C2v) cage (Fig. 1). Meanwhile, the same Extending the Cage Size electron transfer from the encaged group showed that even fullerenes being While it is expected that enlargement metal ions to the carbon structure able to form IPR cages are stabilized in a of the caged cluster could also stabilize occurs. The charge separation in the non-IPR form by a dimetallo structure: 3+ 3- larger cage sizes it was demonstrated form of La @C82 results in non- the endohedral La @C fullerene.4a 2 72 in the frame of the synthesis of cluster dissociating salts. The dissociation in The most recent non-IPR fullerene fullerenes by Yang and Dunsch that this case was blocked for sterical reasons. cage is based on a type of encaged instead, the di- and trimetallofullerenes Besides these monometallofullerenes species: the M C cluster. (Sc C )@C 2 2 2 2 68 (multimetallofullerenes) can result which have been isolated as the first as reported by Wang for which et al., in the stabilization of a large series endohedral structures, noble a Sc C carbide cluster is encaged in a 2 2 of higher fullerene cages. Thus from He to Kr and nonmetal like non-IPR C -C cage.4b Interestingly 2v 68 they isolated for the first time the N and P also have been incorporated. the isomeric structure of the non-IPR largest fullerene cage to date, a These structures form preferably C60 C cage proposed for (Sc C )@C 68 2 2 68 stable Dy @C dimetallofullerene endohedrals, which are prepared under was different from that existing in the 2 100 at high yield as well as the largest high pressure or by bombardment family of nitride cluster fullerenes and is of the preformed fullerene cages. Unlike trimetallofullerene ever isolated, discussed below in detail by Wang, et al. 12 conventional metallofullerenes, all these Dy3@C98. Therefore, the extension endohedral fullerenes are uncharged. The Carbide Structure of the sizes of both the conventional multimetallofullerenes and the encaged How the charge at the fullerene cage The story of stabilizing a C2 clusters opens new avenues in fullerene can be changed by the incorporation moiety was first demonstrated for the research. By extending the fullerene of more than one metal ion as dimetallofullerene, Sc2@C86, which was cage size with large structures of metals multicharged empty fullerenes exist Sc2C2@C84 as demonstrated by a nuclear or clusters inside, another situation in strong doping reactions, e.g., by magnetic resonance (NMR) study.5 arises: the number of IPR-isomers is , was important to know. The fullerene cage of (Sc C )@C was 2 2 84 increasing (for C100, there are 450 Thus many di- and trimetallofullerene first reported by Wang et al., in which isomers) and the variety of structures

34 The Electrochemical Society Interface • Summer 2006 of the metallofullerenes increases (a) (b) dramatically. Thus for Dy2@C100 at least six cage isomers must be taken into consideration (Fig. 3). While the variation of the number of cage isomers is not a preferable situation, the influence of cage size on physical properties and the behavior upon charging the fullerene is of high interest. A New World of Cluster Fullerenes A new world of cluster fullerenes was introduced by a synthesis which occurred by chance. While it was accepted in the fullerene community to avoid as a cooling , the element was the key for a type of cluster fullerenes. Thus a class of endohedral fullerenes with a cluster inside was introduced as the trimetallic nitride endohedral fullerenes, with Sc3N@C80 being the first most abundant member.

This structure was discovered in FIG. 1. (a) X-ray structure of the IPR-violating Sc2@C66 (C2v) 1999 at a yield higher than all other fullerene, showing a top view along the C2 axis and a side view. (b) endohedral fullerenes by introducing a Calculated Sc2@C66 structures. (Adapted from Ref. 3.) small portion of nitrogen gas into the Krätschmer-Huffman generator during vaporization of graphite rods containing metal oxides.13 This method is called (a) (b) the trimetallic nitride template (TNT) process as proposed by the authors.13 In this nitride cluster fullerene as a type of endohedral fullerenes, the carbon cage adopts a caged trimetal nitride cluster structure which is not stable as a single molecule. The carbon cage of such an endohedral fullerene has an isomeric form which has not been isolated as an empty cage so far. The icosahedral C80 cage is stabilized by the electron transfer from the nitride cluster. Therefore, the trimetal nitride cluster structure and the icosahedral carbon cage appear to be stabilized by each other. The stabilizing effect of the nitride cluster is a further subject of detailed studies on the nitride cluster fullerenes to understand why such fullerenes are stabilized in these two ways. Based on this method, several cluster fullerenes were produced like Er Sc N@C (x = 0-3)13,14 and x 3-x 80 FIG. 2. (a) Schematic representation of the (Sc2C2)@C84 (D2d) molecule. (Adapted from AxSc3-xN@C68 (x = 0-2; A = Tm, Er, Ref. 5.); (b) Structures calculated for Sc3C2@C80 with two views. (Adapted from Ref. 11.) Gd, Ho, La).15 In the latter case the trimetallic nitride is trapped in a non- 15 was made by Yang et al. on the basis of IPR C68 cage. The Sc3N@C68 with structures described in the past high-yield synthesis by the reactive gas the Sc3N cluster encapsulated in a D3 resulted in very low yields. Generally, atmosphere procedure described below (isomer 6140) non-IPR C68 cage, as endohedral metallofullerenes yield determined by X-ray crystallography and a facile isolation.20 2% or less from the fullerene soot.1,2 and NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 4a),15,16 Furthermore the following nitride The first description of the Sc3N@C80 makes this fullerene particularly cluster structures have been synthesized fullerene formation by the TNT process interesting. Besides the recent studies on by the TNT method despite the claimed to secure a higher yield of the theoretical calculations of the molecular relatively low yield of the nitride cluster cluster fullerene in the soot extract structure of Sc N@C on the basis of 21 22,23 ranging from 3 to 5%.13 While in the 3 68 fullerenes: Sc3N@C78, Lu3N@C80, 13 17-19 23 original work, air traces were used the C NMR spectrum, a detailed Lu3-xAxN@C80 (x = 0-2; A = Gd, Ho), study on its electronic and vibrational 24 as a source of nitrogen, an improved and Y3N@C80. structures (Fig. 4b) with density route for nitride cluster fullerene must The standard arc discharge functional theory (DFT) computations production of endohedral fullerene (continued on next page)

The Electrochemical Society Interface • Summer 2006 35 Dunsch and Yang (continued from previous page) be searched based on other selective nitrogen sources. The breakthrough was achieved by the development of the reactive gas atmosphere method in our group.25-31 Here, by introducing NH3 as the reactive gas, for the first time the nitride cluster fullerenes were produced as the dominant products in the soot, while the relative yield of the empty fullerene and conventional metallofullerenes was less than 5%.25-31 In this way it has been demonstrated for the first time that the endohedral fullerene is the main product in the soot mixture, thus making the isolation of the endohedral fullerenes much more facile as only one separation step even by a simple chromatographic technique was needed. 449:D2 18:C2 148:C1 In applying this synthesis method the prerequisite for a successful application was fulfilled. On the basis of the preferential production of the nitride cluster fullerenes, several large families of cluster fullerenes M3N@C2n (M = Ho, Tb, Gd, Dy, Tm; 38 ≤ n ≤ 44) specifically those cluster fullerenes with cages larger 26-30 425:C 426:C 442:C than C80 were isolated by our group. 1 1 2

The Chemical Structure FIG. 3. Schematic structure models of the six probable cage isomers of Dy2@C100 (Dy atoms are omitted of Nitride Cluster Fullerenes for simplification), which also represent the thermodynamically most stable IPR-isomers of the empty C100 fullerene. (Adapted from Ref. 12.) The isomeric structure of the first nitride cluster fullerene Sc3N@C80 (isomer I, Ih) was essentially determined by X-ray crystallography and 13C NMR spectroscopic study.13 In particular, (a) (b) the Sc3N cluster was demonstrated to have a planar structure.13 Likewise, the structure of the non-IPR cluster fullerene Sc3N@C68 and Sc3N@C78 was also well established.13,21 A recent study on Gd3N@C80 (isomer I, Ih) revealed that the Gd3N was pyramidal despite the same symmetry of the C80 32 cage and Sc3N@C80 (isomer I, Ih). Although the isomeric structure of the cage has been well established,13-15 the structure and stability of the cluster and its charge transfer to the cage are rarely studied because such information would not be provided directly by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. Recently, we demonstrated that vibrational spectroscopy is a powerful tool for the structural analysis of fullerenes not only due to its high structural sensitivity but also because of its higher temporal resolution compared to NMR spectroscopy.24-30,33,34 A series of nitride cluster fullerenes, M3N@C80 (I, II) (M = Sc, Gd, Dy, Tm), were studied systematically by vibrational spectroscopy and their FIG. 4. (a) Two orthogonal views of Sc3N@C68 (D3) structure generated from isomer 6,140 geometry isomeric structures were reasonably (DFTB computation level) with encapsulation of the Sc3N cluster. Views are shown from the C3 axis (top) determined.24-27,29,33,34 and the C2 axis (bottom). (Adapted from Ref. 15.); (b) The proposed vibrational modes of the adjacent pentagons in Sc3N@C68 (D3) (bottom). (Adapted from Ref. 20.)

36 The Electrochemical Society Interface • Summer 2006 (a) (b) (c) (d)

FIG. 5. Schematic structure model of three isomers of Dy3N@C80. (a) Isomer I (Ih); (b) Isomer II (D5h). The most probable symmetry of the third isomer is proposed to be D5d and shown in two views. (c) top view along the main C5 axis assuming that one Dy locates on the C5 axis; (d) front view. The Dy and C atoms are drawn in red and gray, respectively. The N atoms are hidden by the central C or Dy atoms. (Adapted from Ref. 29.)

6+ 6- 38 33,34,39,42 On the basis of the reports on the cage, i.e., [Sc3N] @C80 . Recent electrochemical behavior. coexistence of two isomers of M3N@C80 high-energy spectroscopic studies on Based on the comparison of the cyclic (M = Sc, Tm, Gd, Dy), which show a series of M3N@C80 (I) (M = Dy, Tm, voltammograms of several tridysprosium different cage structures and electronic Sc) revealed a significant discrepancy Dy3N@C2n (2n = 78, 80), i.e., Dy3N@C80 24-27,33,34 properties, and the theoretical on the effective of the metal (I), Dy3N@C80 (II), and Dy3N@C78 prediction on the existence of 7 IPR- atom, i.e., 2.8, 2.9, and 2.4 for Dy, Tm, (II), Yang et al. showed the effect of 38-41 obeying isomers for C80 cage, we isolated and Sc, respectively, indicating symmetry and size of the fullerene successfully a third isomer of Dy3N@C80 their distinct difference on the charge cage on the electrochemical behavior 42 with the most probable cage structure transfer from the encaged cluster to the of Dy3N@C2n (2n = 78, 80). The 29 being C80:1 (D5d) (Fig. 5); thus the C80 cage. The electronic property and fascinating finding of this study is that stable isomeric structures of C80 cage bandgap of nitride cluster fullerenes the Dy3N@C80 (I) monoanion exhibits a were expanded. were comprehensively investigated by charge-induced reversible rearrangement UV-vis-NIR spectroscopy and the strong of the structure, which may result from The Properties of influence of the cage isomeric structure the change of the Dy3N cluster to a Nitride Cluster Fullerenes and cage size on electronic structure pyramidal form.42 The onset of visible/near-IR of nitride cluster fullerenes has been elaborated.27-30 Outlook absorption of trimetal nitride C80 clusterfullerenes was studied to decide Generally, the vibrational structure Among the physical properties of whether all nitride cluster fullerenes is important for the characterization endohedral fullerenes, the magnetic have any near-IR (NIR) absorptions and of the endohedral fullerenes because it properties have not been largely do behave like small bandgap materials is sensitively correlated to the isomeric explored despite their relevance to 13 potential applications. The recent as was claimed first for Sc3N@C80. No structure of the cages. Moreover, the NIR absorption was observed, the onset structure of the caged cluster could breakthrough on the high-yield of all the C80 nitride cluster fullerenes be probed by its vibrational pattern production of nitride cluster fullerenes, was similar, and the optical bandgaps given by both infrared and Raman however, has advanced this situation. were all higher than 1 eV. Therefore spectroscopy. Besides the study on The magnetic structure of M3N@C80 (M = Ho, Tb) has been investigated, in the nitride cluster fullerenes are stable the C80-based nitride cluster fullerene which the strong ligand fields within the compounds being nearly as stable as M3N@C80 (I, II) (M = Sc, Gd, Dy, 24,34 27,29,30,34,39 M N cluster act on the ferromagnetically C60. Tm), some nitride cluster 3 exchange-coupled moments of M. As a The chemical reactivity of the nitride fullerenes based on other cages such result of this combination of different cluster fullerenes is similar to that of the as M3N@C78 (M = Sc, Tm) were also types of interaction, the individual conventional metallofullerenes. Thus investigated for detailed insights into magnetic moments are not collinearly the reaction of the C=C double bond their isomeric structures as well as their 30,34 aligned but are parallel to the M-N can be used to derivatize the endohedral vibrational structures. A recent bonds.43,44 A more recent study on the fullerene.2 Besides, functionalized study on the electronic and vibrational structures of the non-IPR Sc N@C was magnetic property of Dy3N@C80 (I) derivatives of M3N@C80 (M = Sc, Y, Gd) 3 68 20 suggests strong Ising-like anisotropy due have also been reported.35-37 made by Yang et al. to crystal field and spin-orbit coupling.45 High-energy spectroscopy shows The electrochemistry of a series The successful synthesis of peapods, that Sc N@C can be formally treated of nitride clusterfullerene M3N@C80 3 80 i.e., nanotubes encapsulating fullerene as a positively charged cluster inside a (I) (M = Sc, Dy, Tm) was studied negativelycharged icosahedral carbon systematically to address the effect of the caged cluster on their (continued on next page)

The Electrochemical Society Interface • Summer 2006 37 Dunsch and Yang (continued from previous page)

molecules inside the core, has initiated had been derived.49-51 The change of variety of new chemical structures a new branch of metallofullerene conduction properties of SWNTs upon with exciting properties. Therefore research. It is expected that the bandgap metallofullerene filling has been studied breakthroughs in the application of modulation in peapods generates for (Dy@C82)m@SWNTs, showing the endohedral fullerenes can be fully conceptually new molecular devices, modulation of the electronic structure anticipated.  with different functionalities compared by the insertion of Dy@C82 molecules to empty single-walled nanotube and allowing the fabrication of novel (SWNT) electronic devices.46-48 Detailed transistors and rectifiers.52,53 information on such metallofullerene Projecting to the future of endohedral peapods as (EMF)m@SWNTs (EMF fullerenes research, this fast-growing = Gd@C82, La2@C80, and Sc2@C84) field will undoubtedly reveal a large

References 1. H. Shinohara, Rep. Prog. Phys., 63, 843 18. J. U. Reveles, T. Heine, and A. M. Köster, M. Knupfer, and L. Dunsch, J. Phys. Chem. (2000). J. Phys. Chem. A, 109, 7068 (20005). A, 109, 7088 (2005). 2. T. Akasaka and S. Nagase, Endofullerenes: 19. J. M. Campanera, C. Bo, and J. M. Poblet, 40. X. Liu, M. Krause, T. Pichler, L. Dunsch, A New Family of Carbon Clusters, Kluwer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44, 7230 (2005). and M. Knupfer, Phys. Rev. B, 72, 085407-1 Dordrecht (2002). 20. S. F. Yang, M. Kalbac, A. Popov, and (2005). 3. C. R. Wang, T. Kai, T. Tomiyama, L. Dunsch, Chem. Eur. J., In press. 41. H. Shiozawa, H. Rauf, T. Pichler, D. Grimm, T. Yoshida, Y. Kobayashi, E. Nishibori, 21. M. M. Olmstead, A. Bettencourt-Dias, X. Liu, M. Knupfer, M. Kalbac, S. Yang, M. Takata, M. Sakata, and H. Shinohara, J. C. Duchamp, S. Stevenson, D. Marciu, L. Dunsch, B. Büchner, and D. Batchelor, Nature, 408, 426 (2000). H. C. Dorn, and A. L. Balch, Angew. Chem. Phys. Rev. B, 72, 195409-1 (2005). 4. (a) H. Kato, T. Taninaka, T. Sugai, and Int. Ed., 40, 1223 (2001). 42. S. F. Yang, M. Zalibera, P. Rapta, L. Dunsch, H. Shinohara, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125, 7782 22. S. Stevenson, H. M. Lee, M. M. Olmstead, Chem. Eur. J., In press. (2003); (b) Z. Q. Shi, X. Wu, C. R. Wang, C. Kozikowski, P. Stevenson, and 43. M. Wolf, K.-H. Müller, Y. Skourski, X. Lu, H. Shinohara, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., A. L. Balch, Chem. Eur. J., 8, 4528 (2002). D. Eckert, P. Georgi, M. Krause, and 45, 2107 (2006). 23. E. B. Iezzi, J. C. Duchamp, K. R. Fletcher, L. Dunsch, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44, 3306 5. C. R. Wang, T. Kai, T. Tomiyama, T. E. Glass, and H. C. Dorn, Nano Lett., 2, (2005). T. Yoshida, Y. Kobayashi, E. Nishibori, 1187 (2002). 44. M. Wolf, K.-H. Müller, D. Eckert, M. Takata, M Sakata, and H. Shinohara, 24. M. Krause, H. Kuzmany, P. Georgi, Y. Skourski, P. Georgi, R. Marczak, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 40, 397 (2001). L. Dunsch, K. Vietze, and G. Seifert, M. Krause, and L. Dunsch, J. Magn. Magn. 6. Y. Iiduka, T. Wakahara, K. Nakajima, J. Chem. Phys., 115, 6596 (2001). Mater., 290, 290 (2005). T. Tsuchiya, T. Nakahodo, Y. Maeda, 25. L. Dunsch, M. Krause, J. Noack, and 45. Y. Arango, S. F. Yang, K. Kataev, L. Dunsch, T. Akasaka, N. Mizorogi, and S. Nagase, P. Georgi, J. Phys. Chem. Sol., 65, 309 and B. Büchner, ChemPhysChem, Chem. Commun., 2057 (2006). (2004). To be published. 7. T. Inoue, T. Tomiyama, T. Sugai, T. Okazaki, 26. L. Dunsch, P. Georgi, M. Krause, and 46. S. J. Tans, A. R. Verschueren, and T. Suematsu, N. Fujii, H. Utsumi, C. R. Wang, Synth. Met., 135, 761 (2003). C. Dekker, Nature, 393, 49 (1998). K. Nojima, and H. Shinohara, J. Phys. 27. M. Krause and L. Dunsch, Angew. Chem. 47. Z. Yao, H. W. Ch. Postma, L. Balents, and Chem. B, 108, 7573 (2004). Int. Ed., 44, 1557 (2005). C. Dekker, Nature, 402, 273 (1999). 8. T. Inoue, T. Tomiyama, T. Sugai, and 28. S. F. Yang and L. Dunsch, J. Phys. Chem. B, 48. R. D. Antonov and A. T. Johnson, Phys. Rev. H. Shinohara, Chem. Phys. Lett., 382, 226 109, 12320 (2005). Lett., 83, 3274 (1999). (2003). 29. S. F. Yang and L. Dunsch, Chem. Eur. J., 12, 49. K. Hirahara, K. Suenaga, S. Bandow, 9. H. Shinohara, M. Inakuma, N. Hayashi, 413 (2006). H. Kato, T. Okazaki, H. Shinohara, and H. Sato, Y. Saito, T. Kato, and S. Bandow, 30. M. Krause, J. Wong, and L. Dunsch, Chem. S. Iijima, Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 5384 (2000). J. Phys. Chem., 98, 8597 (1994). Eur. J., 11, 706 (2005). 50. B. W. Smith, D. E. Luzzi, and Y. Achiba, 10. A. Bartl and L. Dunsch, Synth. Met., 121, 31. L. Dunsch, P. Georgi, F. Ziegs, and Chem. Phys. Lett., 331, 137 (2000). 1147 (2001). H. Zöller, Ger. Pat. DE 10301722 A1 (2003). 51. A. Débarre, R. Jaffiol, C. Julien, 11. Y. Liduka, T. Wakahaea, T. Nakahodo, 32. S. Stevensen, J. P. Phillips, J. E. Reid, D. Nutarelli, A. Richard, and P. Tchenio, T. Tsuchiya, A. Sakuraba, Y. Maeda, M. M. Olmstead, S. P. Rath, and Phys. Rev. Lett., 91, 085501 (2003). T. Akasaka, K. Yoza, E. Horn, T. Kato, A. L. Balch, Chem. Commun., 2814 (2004). 52. P. W. Chiu, G. Gu, G. T. Kim, G. Philipp, S. M. T. H. Liu, N. Mizorogi, K. Kobayashi, 33. For a recent review, see L. Dunsch and Roth, S. F. Yang, and S. H. Yang, Appl. Phys. and S. Nagase, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, S. Yang, Small, In preparation. Lett., 79, 3845 (2001). 12500 (2005). 34. M. Krause and L. Dunsch, ChemPhysChem, 53. P W. Chiu, S. F. Yang, S. H. Yang, G. Gu, 12. S. F. Yang and L. Dunsch, Angew. Chem. Int. 5, 1445 (2004). and S. Roth, Appl. Phys. A, 76, 463 (2003). Ed., 45, 1299 (2006). 35. (a) E. B. Iezzi, J. C. Duchamp, K. Harich, 13. S. Stevenson, G. Rice, T. Glass, K. Harich, T. E. Glass, H. M. Lee, MM. Olmstead, F. Cromer, M. R. Jordan, J. Craft, E. Hajdu, A. Balch, and H. C. Dorn, J. Am. Chem. R. Bible, M. M. Olmstead, K. Maitra, Soc., 124, 524 (2002); (b) H. M. Lee, A. J. Fisher, A. L. Balch, and H. C. Dorn, M. M. Olmstead, E. Iezzi, J. C. Duchamp, Nature, 401, 55 (1999). H. C. Dorn, and A. L. Balch, J. Am. Chem. 14. M. M. Olmstead, A. de Bettencourt-Dias, Soc., 124, 3494 (2002); (c) E. B. Iezzi, J. C. Duchamp, S. Stevenson, H. C. Dorn, F. Cromer, P. Stevenson, and H. C. Dorn, and A. L. Balch, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, Synth. Met., 128, 289 (2002). 12220 (2000). 36. C. M. Cardona, A. Kitaygorodskiy, and 15. S. Stevenson, P. W. Fowler, T. Heine, L. Echegoyen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, J. C. Duchamp, G. Rice, T. Glass, K. Harich, 10448 (2005). E. Hajdu, R. Bible, and H. C. Dorn, Nature, 37. S. Stevensen, R. R. Stephen, T. M. Amos, 408, 427 (2000). V. R. Cadorette, J. E. Reid, and J. P. Phillips, 16. M. M. Olmstead, H. M. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, 12776 (2005). J. C. Duchamp, S. Stevenson, D. Marciu, 38. L. Alvarez, T. Pichler, P. Georgi, H. C. Dorn, and A. L. Balch, Angew. Chem. T. Schwieger, H. Peisert, L. Dunsch, Z. Hu, Int. Ed., 42, 900 (2003). M. Knupfer, J. Fink, P. Bressler, M. S. Mast, 17. S. S. Park, D. Liu, and F. Hagelberg, J. Phys. Golden, Phys. Rev. B, 66, 035107-1 (2002). Chem. A, 109, 8865 (2005). 39. M. Krause, X. Liu, J. Wong, T. Pichler,

38 The Electrochemical Society Interface • Summer 2006 About the Authors LOTHAR DUNSCH is head of the Group of Electrochemistry and Conducting Polymer, Leibniz-Institute for State and Materials Research (IFW) Dresden, Germany and apl. Professor in electrochemistry at the University of Technology Dresden. His research interests include endohedral fullerenes, conducting polymers and different fields of in situ spectroelectrochemistry. He may be reached at [email protected]. SHANGFENG YANG is a Humboldt Fellow in the Group of Electrochemistry and Conducting Polymer, Leibniz-Institute for Solid State and Materials Research (IFW) Dresden, Germany. He received his PhD from Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) in 2004. His research interests include the synthesis and characterization of novel endohedral fullerenes as well as their potential applications. He may be reached at [email protected].

The Electrochemical Society Interface • Summer 2006 39