Parks Victoria Annual Report 2013–2014
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter 8. Aboriginal Water Values and Uses
Chapter 8. Aboriginal water values and uses Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 8. Aboriginal water values and uses The Murray-Darling Basin Plan requires Basin states to identify objectives and outcomes of water, based on Aboriginal values and uses of water, and have regard to the views of Traditional Owners on matters identified by the Basin Plan. Victoria engaged with Traditional Owner groups in the Water Resource Plan for the northern Victoria area to: • outline the purpose, scope and opportunity for providing water to meet Traditional Owner water objectives and outcomes through the Murray-Darling Basin Plan • define the role of the water resource plans in the Basin, including but not limited to the requirements of the Basin Plan (Chapter 10, Part 14) • provide the timeline for the development and accreditation of the Northern Victoria Water Resource Plan • determine each Traditional Owner group’s preferred means of engagement and involvement in the development of the Northern Victoria Water Resource Plan • continue to liaise and collaborate with Traditional Owner groups to integrate specific concerns and opportunities regarding the water planning and management framework. • identify Aboriginal water objectives for each Traditional Owner group, and desired outcomes The Water Resource Plan for the Northern Victoria water resource plan area, the Victorian Murray water resource plan area and the Goulburn-Murray water resource plan area is formally titled Victoria’s North and Murray Water Resource Plan for the purposes of accreditation. When engaging with Traditional Owners this plan has been referred to as the Northern Victoria Water Resource Plan and is so called in Chapter 8 of the Comprehensive Report. -
Maribyrnong River Valley Design Guidelines
MARIBYRNONG RIVER VALLEY DESIGN GUIDELINES APRIL 2010 CONTENTS Minister’s foreword 01 Executive summary 02 Acknowledgements 09 1 Introduction 11 1.1 Why these guidelines are needed 13 1.2 Policy context 13 1.3 Overview of the river 14 1.4 Study area 18 2 What we want to achieve 21 2.1 Vision 22 2.2 Preferred river character 23 3 Priorities for action 29 3.1 Enlarge the open space corridor 30 3.2 Improve site and precinct planning 38 3.3 Undertake important capital works 41 3.4 Improve overall governance 44 3.5 Refine planning controls 45 3.6 Enhance community engagement 51 4 Design guidelines 53 4.1 Additional open space 54 4.2 Open space management – landscape 59 4.3 Open space management – access 63 4.4 Landform 66 4.5 Urban development interface 68 4.6 Site layout and building visibility 70 4.7 Building design 76 4.8 Infrastructure design 79 5 Definitions and abbreviations 81 5.1 Definitions 81 5.2 Abbreviations 82 6 Bibliography 83 7 Appendices 84 Appendix A Relevant maps of the Maribyrnong River 84 Appendix B Consultation, views and values 91 Appendix C Broad objectives table 96 Appendix D Possible planning permit conditions 102 Appendix E Planning Schemes zoning map 104 Appendix F Maribyrnong River Valley settlement chronology 105 Appendix G Maribyrnong River – responsibilities of government agencies 108 MINISTER’S FOREWORD Consistent and coordinated planning is essential for protecting the natural and built character of our treasured waterways. The Maribyrnong River is one of Melbourne’s most used and loved assets, with thousands of Melburnians relaxing along the river every day. -
Northern Region
Section 5 Northern Region 109 5.1 Northern Region overview ............................................................................................... 111 5.2 Victorian Murray system .................................................................................................. 114 5.2.1 Barmah Forest ...................................................................................................... 116 5.2.2 Gunbower Creek and Forest ................................................................................ 119 5.2.3 Central Murray wetlands ...................................................................................... 124 5.2.4 Hattah Lakes ........................................................................................................ 129 5.2.5 Lower Murray wetlands ........................................................................................ 132 5.2.6 Lindsay, Mulcra and Wallpolla islands .................................................................. 137 5.3 Ovens system ................................................................................................................... 141 5.4 Goulburn system .............................................................................................................. 145 5.4.1 Goulburn River ..................................................................................................... 147 5.4.2 Goulburn wetlands ............................................................................................... 152 5.5 Broken system ................................................................................................................. -
Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R. -
Controlling Deer in Victoria
Controlling deer in Victoria AN OPEN LETTER TO The Hon. The Hon. The Hon. Jaclyn Symes Lily D’Ambrosio Lisa Neville Minister for Minister for Energy, Minister for Water Regional Development, Environment and Minister for Police and Agriculture and Resources Climate Change Emergency Services Level 36, 121 Exhibition St, Level 16, 8 Nicholson St, Level 17, 8 Nicholson St, Melbourne VIC 3000 East Melbourne VIC 3002 East Melbourne VIC 3002 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 2 May 2019 Dear Ministers Symes, D’Ambrosio and Neville, We are writing to you in your roles as key natural resource Ministers in the Victorian Government. We are concerned that Victoria’s Draft Deer Management Strategy (2018) fell far short of addressing the considerable problems feral deer bring to peri-urban and regional communities, and to wetlands, catchments and the natural environment. We offer here some recommendations for the final strategy; it is a critical opportunity to control deer populations and to reverse the increasing impacts they are having. We agree with the rough estimate for the state’s deer population, as documented in the draft strategy, at ‘between several hundred thousand up to one million or more’. The population is growing rapidly at an exponential rate1, and far exceeds the capacity for control by recreational hunters. Research into the native habitats of the four main species of deer in Victoria indicates that they can continue to extend their range, potentially occupying almost every habitat in the nation2. Victoria’s biodiversity is at risk. -
National Parks Act Annual Report 2014 © the State of Victoria Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2014
National Parks Act Annual Report 2014 © The State of Victoria Department of Environment and Primary Industries 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment and Primary Industries logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Printed by Impact Digital – Brunswick ISSN 1839-437X ISSN 1839-4388 (online) Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DEPI Customer Service Centre on 136186, email customer. [email protected] or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.depi.vic.gov.au Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Further information For further information, please contact the DEPI Customer Service Centre on 136 186 or the Parks Victoria Information Centre on 131 963. Notes • The Minister responsible for administering the National Parks Act 1975 during the year was the Hon Ryan Smith MP, Minister for Environment and Climate Change. -
Parks Victoria Annual Report 2005-06
ANNUAL REPORT 2005-2006 Copyright © Parks Victoria 2006 Acknowledgement of Country and Indigenous Traditional Level 10, 535 Bourke Street, Melbourne, Australia. Owners Parks Victoria respectfully acknowledges the original custodians ISSN 1448 – 9082 ISSN 1448 – 9090 (Online) of what is now known as Victoria; their rich culture, deep affinity Published on www.parkweb.vic.gov.au with the land and spiritual connection to it. Parks Victoria is committed to establishing strong relationships and partnerships This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process with the descendants of the original custodians to facilitate their except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. active involvement in the future management of protected areas in Victoria. General Disclaimer This document may be of assistance to you, but Parks Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the information it contains is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this document. For further information telephone the Parks Victoria Information Centre on 13 1963 or visit www.parkweb.vic.gov.au Front Cover Images (clockwise from top left) Great Otway National Park, Port Campbell rockpools, St Kilda Pier and Kiosk, Grampians National Park. Buchan Caves. CONTENTS 2About Parks Victoria 23 Enhancing the Visitor Experience Parks Victoria is responsible for sustainably managing much 3 Chairman’s Message of the recreational infrastructure in parks and waterways across 4 Chief Executive’s Message the state. The provision of information services, educational programs and interpretation activities also contributes to visitor 6 The Year at a Glance enjoyment. -
Great Forest National Park
The Great Forest National Park An analysis of the economic and social benefits of the proposed Great Forest National Park Hamish Scully Monash University, June 2015 Hamish Scully – June 2015 Great Forest National Park The Great Forest National Park The Proposed Economic and Social Benefits of the proposed Great Forest National Park A Parliamentary Internship Report Prepared for Ms Samantha Dunn MLC, Member for Eastern Metropolitan By Hamish Scully Disclaimer: This report is not an official report of the Parliament of Victoria. Parliamentary Intern Reports are prepared by political science students as part of the requirements for the Victorian Parliamentary Internship Program. The Program is jointly coordinated by the Department of Parliamentary Services through the Parliamentary Library & Information Service and the Organisation Development unit, the University of Melbourne, Monash University, and Victoria University. The views expressed in this report are those of the author. Image on front cover reproduced from: http://www.greatforestnationalpark.com.au/giant-trees.html Page | 2 Hamish Scully – June 2015 Great Forest National Park Acknowledgements I would like to thank Ms Samantha Dunn MLC for her support and guidance during the course of this research. Additionally I would like to thank the co-ordinators of the Victorian Parliamentary Internship. The time and effort of Dr Paul Strangio, Dr Lea Campbell, Dr Julie Stephens, Jon Breukel, Voula Andritsos and Liesel Dumenden has made the production of this report, and the program itself, a very rewarding experience. Page | 3 Hamish Scully – June 2015 Great Forest National Park Executive Summary This report seeks to analyse the economic and social benefits that can be reasonably expected to be derived through the establishment of the proposed Great Forest National Park (GFNP) in the Central Highlands in Melbourne’s northeast. -
Click Here to View Asset
Published by Arts Victoria. The views expressed in this publication are based on information provided by third party authors. Arts Victoria does not necessarily endorse the views of a particular author. All information contained in this publication is considered correct at the time of printing. Arts Victoria VIAA PRE -SELECTION PANEL EXHIBITION CURATORS , Private Bag No. 1 Maree Clarke, Curatorial Manager, DESIGN AND HANGING South Melbourne 3205 Koorie Heritage Trust; Stephen Boscia Galleries Victoria Australia Gilchrist, Curator – Indigenous Art, PHOTOGRAPHY TELEPHONE 03 9954 5000 National Gallery of Victoria; Jirra Harvey, Freelance Curator. Ponch Hawkes FACSIMILE 03 9686 6186 CATALOGUE DESIGN TTY 03 9682 4864 VIAA FINAL JUDGING PANEL AND SPONSORS Actual Size TOLL FREE 1800 134 894 Lorraine Coutts, Indigenous Curator; (Regional Victoria only) Kevin Williams, Indigenous artist; PRINTED BY [email protected] Zara Stanhope, freelance Curator; Gunn and Taylor Printers www.arts.vic.gov.au Stephen Gilchrist, Curator – Indigenous Art, National Gallery The VIAA exhibition runs from of Victoria; Judith Ryan, Senior 29 November to 20 December Curator – Indigenous Art, National 2008, Boscia Galleries, Melbourne Gallery of Victoria; Jason Eades, Victoria, 3000. CEO – Koorie Heritage Trust; Nerissa The exhibition is free and open to Broben, Curatorial Manager – Koorie the public. Heritage Trust; Chris Keeler, Curatorial Assistant – Koorie Artworks featured in the VIAA Heritage Trust. exhibition are available for purchase. This publication is copyright. No part SPONSORS ’ REPRESENTATIVES Michele and Anthony Boscia, may be reproduced by any process Boscia Galleries. except in accordance with provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Thank you to all the artists who entered the awards. -
The Dandenong Creek Catchment Extends from the Dandenong
The many dedicated groups already working in the catchment the are limited in their ability to deal with the scale of works necessary to improve the condition of the area. promise A coordinated approach is needed to shape future urban and the vision natural environments so they set standards for and attract the most sustainable 21st century investments and development. iving Links will establish an interconnected web of habitat corridors, linking existing open space, conservation reserves, recreation L facilities and the many fragmented patches of native vegetation across the catchment. It will the enhance the social and economic attractiveness of the region’s rapidly developing commercial, industrial and new residential centres by strengthening their present relationship with the natural environment. Fortunately, many of the basic building blocks needed to help turn the vision into reality already exist. The he Dandenong Creek catchment extends from the Dandenong catchment contains numerous regionally significant Ranges National Park near Kilsyth, sweeps south to include parks such as Jells Park, Shepherd’s Bush and the the rapidly growing industrial and urban areas surrounding Bushy Park Wetlands. These are well connected and T Greater Dandenong and Casey, before flowing south-west to provide a network of walking and cycling trails. link with Port Phillip Bay near Frankston. The catchment is also home to other state and regionally significant natural parklands such as In all, it covers 855 square kilometres of Melbourne’s south-east Braeside Park, Lysterfield Park, Churchill National Park region. Scattered throughout the catchment are a series of regional, and the Seaford-Edithvale Wetlands that are presently state, national and internationally significant natural features including relatively isolated from one another. -
Yuranga Aboriginal Network Mildura Local Aboriginal Network
YURANGA ABORIGINAL NETWORK MILDURA LOCAL ABORIGINAL NETWORK COMMUNITY PLAN 2020 OFFICIAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RESPECT TELKI NGAWINGI (Latji Latji for Good Day) We would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the traditional owners of this Country and the Elders who have passed into the Dreaming and Elders present today who have survived the impacts of Colonisation. Our Elders are the Cornerstone of our communities and we pay our Respect to them, their journeys, their strength and their Resilience. If it were not for them, we would not be here. OFFICIAL The Yuranga Local Aboriginal Network in Mildura was established in 2008, as part of the then Victorian Government’s New Representative Arrangement for Aboriginal People living in Victoria. The LAN’s original Community Plan was Titled: “The Mildura Local Indigenous Network – The Yuranga Aboriginal Committee, Community Plan.” It’s overarching framework was the VIAF of the time. Local Aboriginal Networks (LANs) bring Aboriginal people together to set priorities develop community plans and improve social connection. Our Mildura LAN has an Aboriginal name, which means “bend in the river.” The LAN in Mildura has been active within the Mildura community and over the years has held a number of Projects and supported others, however we have worked with the local Mildura Rural City Council and have produced a video that sits on the AV Website. MRCC have endorsed our Community Plan and it also sits on their Website along with all of the Geographical Community Plans, as the Municipality’s first Cultural Plan. Our LAN now has approximately 212 participants and there are 39 LANs in the State of Victoria. -
Rehabilitation Guidelines for the Resort Areas of Kosciuszko National Park
Rehabilitation Guidelines for the Resort Areas of Kosciuszko National Park August 2007 Rehabilitation Guidelines for the Resort Areas of Kosciuszko National Park Prepared for: Parks and Wildlife Division Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW PO Box 2228 Jindabyne NSW 2627 Australia By: nghenvironmental PO Box 4770 Bega NSW 2550 Australia Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW 59-61 Goulburn St PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Australia Ph: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Ph: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Ph: 1300 361 967 (national parks information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTy: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] DECC 2007/596 ISBN 978 1 74232 037 3 First Edition published August 2007 Front cover photographs courtesy of Kosciuszko Thredbo Pty Ltd, Perisher Blue Pty Ltd and Mount Selwyn Snowfields Pty Ltd. Acknowledgements This document has been created in collaboration with Marnie Stewart DEC, Liz MacPhee DEC and a steering committee representing the NSW alpine resorts including Kosciuszko Thredbo, Perisher Blue, Charlotte Pass and Mount Selwyn. It was prepared by nghenvironmental. Liz MacPhee (NPWS Rehabilitation Officer, Former Snowy Sites Scheme) provided significant information in regard to the planning of rehabilitation and relevant rehabilitation techniques that have been researched and applied in Victorian alpine resorts. This information in this document is the intellectual property of the Department of Environment and Conservation and is protected under copyright laws. Amendments and Additions The only controlled copy of the Rehabilitation Guidelines will be the version available at www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au Amendments are to be recorded in the table below.