PLANNING DECISIONS – October 2019

Application No : 15/00144/OUT Decision : Application Withdrawn Location : 27 - 29 Eldon Way Hockley Essex Proposal : Outline Application to Demolish Warehouse Units 27, 28 and 29 and Construct Three Storey Building Incorporating 5no. Retail Units and Up to 20 Flats (8no. Two Bedroomed and 12no. One Bedroomed) and Associated Parking. All Matters Reserved (Resubmission Following Refusal of Application Ref: 13/00351/OUT) Applicant : Sapphire Packaging - Mr Stuart Reeves

Application No : 16/00576/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval of Details Not Required Location : 60 Warwick Road Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear Extension. Projection 4.0m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 3.0m, Maximum Height 3.0m Applicant : Mr & Mrs Shuttleworth

Application No : 17/00132/PD Decision : Permitted Development Location : London Southend Airport Southend Airport Rochford Proposal : Repairs to hardsurfacing areas, removal of grassed areas and replacement with a rigid paved surface. Applicant : London Southend Airport - Jon Horn

Application No : 17/00530/FUL Decision : Application Withdrawn Location : 57 South Street Rochford Essex Proposal : Demolish Existing Building and Construct Four Storey Building Comprising 11.no one bedroomed and 2no. Two Bedroomed Flats, Car Parking and Associated Landscaping Applicant : Essex Housing

Page 1 of 22

Application No : 17/00877/OUT Decision : Refuse Planning Permission Location : Cherry Orchard Brickworks Cherry Orchard Lane Rochford Proposal : Outline Application with Some Matters Reserved for proposed retirement village consisting of the following: 32 no. over 55's apartments, 22 no. over 55's dwelling houses and 9 no. over 55's bungalows 30 no. assisted living apartments 34 no. sheltered apartments 93 bed care home 903sqm of A1 space 397sqm of A3 space 1974sqm of B1 space 890sqm of D1 space 197 parking spaces. Access to the site the only Reserved Matter for consideration at the outline stage. Applicant : Cherry Orchard Homes & Villages Limited - Mr Neil Ryan

Reason(s) for Refusal

1 The proposed development would not accord with the adopted development plan which allocates the site for employment use as part of a business park. There are no material planning considerations which warrant a departure from the statutory development plan. The proposal would undermine the economic objective of sustainable development which seeks to ensure that sufficient land is available to support economic growth. The proposal would fall contrary to policy E3 of the JAAP, policy NEL3 of the Allocations Plan and policy ED4 of the Core Strategy.

2 The proposal is not considered to represent sustainable development and would fall contrary to the NPPF by virtue of proposing a significant residential element which would not be a use that would sit comfortably against and be in the interests of good spatial planning immediately alongside a large employment site. This is particularly the case as the main vehicular access would be expected to be via the adjoining business park and given the proposed C2 Use Class development and restriction to persons over 55, (less likely to take advantage of neighbouring employment opportunity) and given the significant distance from existing residential settlements, facilities and amenities.

3 The proposal, by virtue of the type of residential accommodation proposed, namely age restricted and a significant proportion involving an element of care, would not respond most closely to the identified need in the district and would not cater for a mixed demographic group, contrary to policy H5 of the Core Strategy.

4 Affordable housing is required in respect of any dwellings proposed that fall within the C3 Use Class, as set out in policy H4 of the Core Strategy. The proposed age limitation to over 55's only in relation to the affordable housing and the proposed mix to include a significant proportion of sheltered affordable housing would not fulfil the affordable housing need in the Rochford District most effectively. The proposal, for the above-mentioned reasons would not accord with policy H4 of the Core Strategy.

5 The proposed residential development would not accord with the requirement in the NPPF that a sequential approach to flood risk is followed. The applicant has not demonstrated that there are no other sites within the district at lower flood Trisk where the type of development proposed could be delivered. The proposal in this regard is therefore objectionable on flood risk grounds Page 2 of 22 contrary to policy ENV3 of the Core Strategy (2011) and relevant parts of Section 14 of the NPPF.

Application No : 18/00266/FUL Decision : Non-determination Location : 87 Canewdon View Road Ashingdon SS4 3DU Proposal : Demolish existing buildings and Construct Five 3-bed Dwellings Applicant : Mr D Wilson

Application No : 18/00379/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Rainbows End Beeches Road Rawreth Proposal : Retention of Siting of a Mobile Home (replacement of the mobile home existing on the site) for Residential Use, Occupied by an Agricultural Worker. Applicant : Essex Goats

Application No : 18/00654/DOC Decision : Discharge Of Conditions Location : Land West Of Oak Road And North Of Hall Road Rochford Proposal : Discharge of Condition 2 (Surface Water Drainage) of Approved Application Ref: 17/00582/FUL Applicant : Bellway Homes

Application No : 18/00847/DOC Decision : Discharge Of Conditions Location : Birch Lodge Anchor Lane Canewdon Proposal : Discharge of Conditions 3, 4, 6, 7, 8,9,12,13,19,21 of approved application 17/00258/FUL: Demolish Existing Dwelling and Construct Development of 14 no Residential Dwellings Applicant : Marks Heeley Ltd - Mr Graham Newman

Application No : 18/00984/DOC Decision : Deemed Consent Location : Land Adjacent Grange Villa London Road Rayleigh Proposal : Discharge of Conditions 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 on planning application 15/00736/FUL: Form Access And Layout Site To Provide Residential Development Of 21 Flats And 26 Houses ( 47 Dwellings In Total) Applicant : Mr Steve Johnson - Silver City Estates Ltd

Page 3 of 22

Application No : 19/00012/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 22 South Street Rochford Proposal : Proposal to Re-instate and Convert an Existing Outbuilding to Provide 2 No. 1-Bed Dwelling Units within the C3 Use Class. Applicant : Parabar Development Ltd

Application No : 19/00011/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Reads Nursery Sutton Road Rochford Proposal : Erection of 3 No. Polytunnels and Security Fence, Change of Use of Part of Building to A3 (Cafe) and Change of Use to Extend Permitted Retail Area. Applicant : Mr S Bird

Application No : 19/00041/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Miranda The Esplanade Hullbridge Proposal : Demolish Bungalow, Subdivide Plot and Construct 2 No. Three Bedroomed Houses Applicant : Parkview Developments - Mr Martin Johnson

Application No : 19/00056/ADV Decision : Application Permitted Location : Land Between Windermere Avenue And Lower Road Malyons Lane Hullbridge Proposal : One non-illuminated goal post type sign and two non- illuminated flag type signs Applicant : David Wilson Homes Eastern Counties

Application No : 19/00135/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Units 1 To 4 Brook Road Industrial Estate Brook Road Proposal : Demolish part of existing building, construct new extension and raise roof over to create two-storey height warehouse. Subdivide into 4 units each with loading bay, facilities and office space at first floor. Amend car parking layout and form new vehicular accesses to the site onto Brook Road.

Applicant : Mr Dhir

Application No : 19/00226/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning Permission Location : Fairdene Church Road Hockley Proposal : Proposed demolition of existing addition and construct part single/part two storey rear extension with roof lantern Applicant : Mrs Danielle Fox

Reason(s) for Refusal

Page 4 of 22

Application No : 19/00249/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning Permission Location : Valentine Cottage Ethelbert Road Ashingdon Proposal : Demolish Existing Dwelling and Construct New Dwelling Applicant : Mr R Wilson

Reason(s) for Refusal

1 The Local Planning Authority has acted positively and proactively in determining this application by identifying matters of concern with the proposal. Unfortunately, it has not been possible to resolve those matters within the timescale allocated for the determination of this planning application. However, the Local Planning Authority has clearly set out, within its report, the basis of the reasons for refusal which may lead to the submission of a more acceptable proposal in the future. The Local Planning Authority is willing to provide pre- application advice in respect of any future application for a revised development in line with the Council's pre-application advice service.

2 The application site lies within the Metropolitan Green Belt as identified in the Rochford District Council Local Development Framework Allocations Plan. The National Planning Policy Framework (2019) sets out the general presumption against inappropriate development within the Green Belt. Such development should not be approved except in very special circumstances. Very special circumstances to justify inappropriate development will not exist unless the potential harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations. The proposed replacement dwelling would fail to meet the criteria set out in Policy DM21 of the Rochford District Council Local Development Framework Development Management Plan, in that the proposed floorspace would exceed 25% of that of the original dwelling and the visual mass and bulk would be significantly larger than the existing dwelling.

Accordingly, the proposal is considered to be inappropriate development in terms of the National Planning Policy Framework that would be materially harmful to the openness of the Green Belt in this location. The fall-back position in terms of the lawful extension of the existing dwelling is not considered to carry sufficient weight to amount to the very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm by reason of inappropriateness or the other harm identified. The development would, therefore, be contrary to Policy DM21 of the Rochford District Council Local Development Framework Development Management Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework (2019).

Application No : 19/00275/DOC Decision : Deemed Consent Location : Land Adjacent Grange Villa London Road Rayleigh Proposal : Discharge of condition no 3 following approval of 15/00736/FUL dated 23rd August 2017 - material brick colour Applicant : Mr Steve Johnson - Silver City Estates Ltd

Page 5 of 22 Application No : 19/00295/DOC Decision : Discharge Of Conditions Location : 7 Woodlands Parade Main Road Hockley Proposal : Application to Discharge Condition 5 (Materials) in relation to Planning Consent 18/00203/FUL Applicant : Mr S Adams

Application No : 19/00297/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Our Lady Of Ransom Catholic Primary School Little Wheatley Chase Rayleigh Proposal : Install an all weather running track Applicant : Mrs Diana Davis

Application No : 19/00298/DEMCO Decision : Application Permitted M Location : Unit 1 68 - 72 West Street Rochford Proposal : Demolish former showroom building Applicant : Shetra Holdings

Application No : 19/00332/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 10 Kingsmans Farm Road Hullbridge SS5 6QB Proposal : Construct a residential pontoon. Applicant : Mr Mark Gatrell

Application No : 19/00344/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Tilneys Hall Road Rochford Proposal : Proposed construction of free-standing garage Applicant : Mr A Smith

Application No : 19/00391/REM Decision : Application Permitted Location : Land North Of London Road And South Of Rawreth Lane And West Of Rawreth Industrial Estate Rawreth Lane Rayleigh Proposal : Reserved Matters for Utility Infrastructure (gas and electricity) - Partial amendment to details previously approved under Reserved Matters approval 17/01114/REM. Outline application was EIA development because an ES was submitted at that time. Applicant : Countryside Properties (UK) Ltd - Mr Wood

Page 6 of 22

Application No : 19/00504/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Temple Farm, Grain Store Sutton Road Sutton Proposal : Retrospective application for the use of building as a mixed use comprising Class B2 general industry operations and Class B8 for storage and distribution of plastering supplies and proposed alterations to access onto Sutton Road Applicant : Mr Neil Moring

Application No : 19/00507/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 49 Laburnum Way Rayleigh SS6 9GN Proposal : Two storey front extension, raise ridge height, loft conversion with front and rear dormers Applicant : Beverley Stanton

Application No : 19/00514/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning Permission Location : Land Opposite 2 Goldsmith Drive Rayleigh Proposal : Construct 1 bedroom bungalow Applicant : Assistu Global Ltd - Mr Benjamin Reeves

Reason(s) for Refusal

1 The proposal would not accord with the adopted Development Plan, the relevant parts of which consist of the Rochford District Allocations Plan (2014), the Core Strategy (2011) and the Development Management Plan (2014). There are no material planning considerations that indicate that this proposal should be determined favourably and not in accordance with the adopted Development Plan. The Allocations Plan (2014) shows the site to be within the Metropolitan Green Belt (MGB) within which planning permission should not be granted for inappropriate development unless very special circumstances clearly outweigh the harm by definition and any other harm. The proposed development would amount to inappropriate development within the MGB which is harmful by definition and in addition further harm to the MGB would be caused as a result of the substantial adverse impact on openness that would result from the construction of a dwelling on otherwise open land. No very special circumstances exist that clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and consequently the proposal would fall contrary to Green Belt policy contained in the NPPF and Policies GB1 of the Core Strategy (2011) and the Allocations Plan (2014). The proposal would have a significant adverse impact on the character of the locality as a result of introducing a residential use of the site which would include a building of substantial and permanent construction, associated driveway and parking and residential paraphernalia associated with the amenity space. The residential use would erode the largely undeveloped character of the locality and set a precedent for other similar development

Page 7 of 22

Application No : 19/00541/LBC Decision : Grant Listed Building Consent Location : 15 West Street Rochford SS4 1BE Proposal : Repairs and Alterations to the rear elevation, repair the door in the façade like for like and internal alteration including installation of shop fitting, ramp and internal walls. Applicant : Samri Pharma Ltd

Application No : 19/00540/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 15 West Street Rochford SS4 1BE Proposal : Change of use from A2 (professional services) to A1 (retail) changing former Barclays Bank to a chemist and pharmacy and external alterations Applicant : Samri Pharma Ltd

Application No : 19/00547/DOC Decision : Discharge Of Conditions Location : Land Adjacent 1 Heycroft Road Hawkwell Proposal : Discharge of conditions 3 and 9 following grant of planning permission 18/01061/FUL: Proposed detached bungalow and form new vehicle crossing onto Heycroft Road (Land Adj 1 Heycroft Road) Applicant : Mr Neil Cochran

Application No : 19/00566/REM Decision : Application Permitted Location : Land East Of Rugby Club Aviation Way Rochford Proposal : Details of reserved matters ( Access, Appearance, Landscaping, Layout and Scale) pursuant to outline planning permission ref 15/00781/OUT dated 31/10/2016 relating to part of the Airport Business Park Southend Masterplan. The development will comprise office and light industrial (Use Class B1), ancillary cafe facilities, landscaping and car parking facilities. (The outline application was not EIA development.) Applicant : Southend-on-Sea Borough Council

Application No : 19/00591/FUL Decision : Application Withdrawn Location : 1 - 9 Ferry Road Hullbridge Essex Proposal : External alterations including alterations to shopfront, together with the installation of external plant, cycle parking, and provision of external collection lockers. Applicant : Co-Operative Group Food Ltd

Page 8 of 22

Application No : 19/00601/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 3 Abbey Road Hullbridge SS5 6DG Proposal : First floor rear extension with extended rear dormers and new twin pitched roofs over remaining flat roof Applicant : Mr Jamie Lunan

Application No : 19/00608/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 18 Aviation Way Rochford Essex Proposal : Proposed addition of new floor to provide B1 office space, conversion of Ground Floor to Gymnasium D2 and Cafe/Function Room A3 & A4 use. Applicant : Mr N Ryan - N. D. Ryan Builders

Application No : 19/00612/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 22 Kenilworth Gardens Rayleigh SS6 9HS Proposal : Erection of an Ancillary Granny Annexe Applicant : Mr & Mrs Preston

Application No : 19/00618/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning Permission Location : 24 Derwent Avenue Rayleigh SS6 8LE Proposal : Erect part single and two storey front extension and single story side extension Applicant : Mr Howard

Reason(s) for Refusal

1 The proposed part single and two storey extension, by reason of its siting, scale and bulk would create an unduly dominant and incongruous form of development that does not relate well to and would have a detrimental impact upon the host dwelling and the streetscene. Therefore, the development would be contrary to policies DM1 and DM3 of the Development Management Plan and the NPPF.

Application No : 19/00628/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 269 Little Wakering Road Little Wakering Essex Proposal : Vehicle crossover Applicant : Mrs Paula Harvey

Application No : 19/00632/LBC Decision : Grant Listed Building Consent Location : 15 West Street Rochford SS4 1BE Proposal : Repair internal walls, moulding and ceiling at ground floor and repair room skirting at first floor and re-instate wall and door section. Applicant : Samri Pharma Ltd Page 9 of 22

Application No : 19/00637/DOC Decision : Discharge Of Conditions Location : Land East Of Rugby Club Aviation Way Rochford Proposal : Discharge conditions 7 (Construction Method Statement) and 27 (Dust Management Plan) attached planning application 15/00781/OUT Applicant : Henry Boot Developments Ltd.

Application No : 19/00642/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning Permission Location : 1 Kingsmead Cottages Barling Road Barling Magna Proposal : Application to Vary Condition 2 to Application No. 17/00443/FUL to Demolish Existing Dwelling, Erect 4-Bed House, Stable and Change Use Of Land to Grazing as Approved on 28th June 2017 and to Allow Revised Plans to Omit stable and Provide Addition to House Applicant : Mr Paul Barthaud

Reason(s) for Refusal

1 The Allocations Plan (2014) shows the site to be within the Metropolitan Green Belt and the proposal is considered to be inappropriate development contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework. Within the Green Belt, planning permission will not be given, except in very special circumstances, for the construction of new buildings (other than replacement dwellings, as defined in Policy DM21 of the Development Management Plan or other policy compliant exceptions). Any development which is permitted shall be of a scale, design and siting, such that the appearance of the countryside is not impaired.

Policy DM21 of the Development Management Plan provides that the total size of a Green Belt replacement dwelling, should result in no more than a 25% increase in floorspace of the original dwelling (as it existed on 1st July 1948 or, if constructed after 1st July 1948, as it was built originally). The proposal in seeking further incremental additions is considered excessive, rather than reasonable, impacting on the openness of this part of the Green Belt contrary to local and national planning policy. There are considered to be no very special circumstances which would clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt that would result by definition and the harm to the openness of the Green Belt.

Application No : 19/00643/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 34 Eastview Drive Rayleigh SS6 9NY Proposal : Two storey rear extension Applicant : Mr M Jones

Page 10 of 22

Application No : 19/00646/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 21 Larkfield Close Rochford SS4 1SS Proposal : Proposed flat roof front dormer Applicant : Mr Martin Stannard

Application No : 19/00647/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful Development Certificate Location : Huvafen Eastwood Rise Eastwood Proposal : Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for proposed conversion of garage to habitable room Applicant : Mr Matthew Hudson-Marshall

Application No : 19/00662/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Rayleigh Tennis Club Watchfield Lane Rayleigh Proposal : Installation of a floodlighting system to courts 2 and 5 comprising of 6 no. 6.7 metre columns with 12 no. luminaires Applicant : Mr R Wilson - Rayleigh Lawn Tennis Club

Application No : 19/00665/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 66 Oakley Avenue Rayleigh SS6 9TE Proposal : Construct two storey rear extension, two storey side extension and single storey side extension Applicant : Mrs Wendy McEwen

Application No : 19/00689/NMA Decision : Application Permitted Location : Ancillary Building At South Side Greenacres Farm Hyde Wood Lane Proposal : Non-material amendment following a grant of planning permission 16/01192/FUL granted on 15/02/2017 (Demolish existing building and construct terrace of three houses on land adjacent) - Addition of roof windows to 1.no. dwelling, two on the north elevation and two on the south elevation Applicant : Bradley Construction Ltd

Application No : 19/00684/OUT Decision : Refuse Planning Permission Location : Heath House 2 Daws Heath Road Rayleigh Proposal : Alter and extend existing dwelling and convert into 8 no self-contained flats Applicant : Mr Benn Sharr

Reason(s) for Refusal

1 The proposed development is situated on a prominent corner plot of Daws Page 11 of 22 Heath Road and Eastwood Road. The proposed development, due to the amount of shared amenity space, appropriate bin storage and impact of the development on the character of the area, is not considered that the site can accommodate 8 no. one and two bedroom flats on site. Therefore, it is considered that the proposed development would amount to overdevelopment. It is considered that the site would be contrary to the NPPF, policies CP1 of the Core Strategy, policies DM1 and DM3 and appendix 1 of the Development Management Plan and the Nationally Described Space Standards.

Application No : 19/00701/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful Development Certificate Location : 69 Upway Rayleigh SS6 8AA Proposal : Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for proposed extension to existing flank roof dormer and erect roof dormer to western roof slope Applicant : Ms M Huxen And Mr C Groombridge

Application No : 19/00705/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 172 New Road Great Wakering Essex Proposal : Proposed two storey side extension Applicant : Mr Jason Colby

Application No : 19/00706/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Belle Lodge Lower Road Hockley Proposal : Single storey rear orangery extension Applicant : Mr Gary Cole

Application No : 19/00717/NMA Decision : Application Withdrawn Location : 167A Eastwood Road Rayleigh SS6 7LE Proposal : Application for non-material amendment comprising increase in width to boundary to single storey rear extension with roof lantern approved on 10th June 2019 under application no 19/00365/FUL Applicant : Mr & Mrs Fox

Application No : 19/00716/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning Permission Location : 16 Albert Close Rayleigh SS6 8HP Proposal : First floor side extension Applicant : Mr D Paine

Reason(s) for Refusal

1 The lack of separation between the first-floor side extension and the boundary would result in a poor design and encourage the visual coalescence of adjacent properties which would be harmful to visual amenity and detrimental to the character of the surrounding area and Page 12 of 22 street scene contrary to SPD2 and policy DM1 of the Development Management Plan.

Application No : 19/00721/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning Permission Location : 39 London Hill Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Two storey rear extension incorporating loft conversion with side dormers Applicant : Mr James Kerry

Reason(s) for Refusal

1 The proposal by virtue of the very significant scale and the poor design of the proposed dormers would result in additions to the roof which would be unattractive and unsympathetic to the existing dwellinghouse and would form overly dominant features in the roof which would be out of keeping with the character of the dwelling to the detriment of visual amenity contrary to Policy DM1 of the Council’s Development Management Plan (2014) and the guidance in the Supplementary Planning Document 2: Housing Design (2007).

Application No : 19/00722/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful Development Certificate Location : 338 Ashingdon Road Ashingdon SS4 3DA Proposal : Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for proposed hip to gable roof extension and create room in roof with flat roof rear dormer and front roof light Applicant : Mr Willis

Application No : 19/00723/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 338 Ashingdon Road Ashingdon SS4 3DA Proposal : Two Storey Rear Extension with Double Pitched Roof Applicant : Mr Willis

Application No : 19/00724/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning Permission Location : Outbuilding Rear Of 9 Leicester Avenue Rochford Proposal : Demolish existing outbuildings and construction of studio unit with associated parking and amenity Applicant : Mr O Ikuesan

Reason(s) for Refusal

1 The proposed development, by reason of its siting, scale, bulk and height is considered to an unacceptable dominant and incongruous addition to the site that would result in a cramped relationship to the boundaries of the site and Page 13 of 22 the host dwelling. Furthermore, the proposed development would provide inadequate private garden areas for the host dwelling and the proposed development, resulting in an unsatisfactory living conditions for occupants of No.9 Leicester Avenue and future occupants of the proposed building. It is considered that the proposed development would detract from the character and appearance of the area and would be materially harmful to the host dwelling contrary to the NPPF, policies DM1 and DM3 of the Development Management Plan and SPD2 - Housing Design.

2 The proposed development, by reason of its siting, scale and height in close proximity to the flank boundaries would mean that the building would unreasonably dominate the outlook from the neighbouring dwellings. Furthermore, due to the proximity of the windows to the shared flank boundaries, the windows would appear apparent from the neighbouring gardens (No's. 9 and 11). A window proposed to be situated in the western flank elevation would compromise the privacy of the adjacent dwelling (No.9). The proposed building's relationship with the shared boundary is such that the windows are an imposing feature on the neighbouring occupiers. The proposal would therefore have a detrimental effect on the enjoyment of the neighbouring garden contrary to policies DM1 and DM3 of the Development Management Plan.

3 The proposed development would result in substantial quality accommodation to the detriment of the living conditions of future occupier's contrary to policy DM4 and the National Described Space Standards.

4 No on-site provision is made for car parking in connection with the additional dwelling resulting in additional vehicle on street parking on the Leicester Avenue carriage way leading to additional increased parking stress to the detriment of highway safety and on the local highway network contrary to EPOA Parking Standards and policy DM30 of the Development Management Plan.

Application No : 19/00725/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 21 Elm Grove Hullbridge SS5 6ER Proposal : Single storey rear extension Applicant : Mr Shane Buckley

Application No : 19/00727/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 41 Victoria Road Rayleigh SS6 8EG Proposal : Proposed two storey and ground floor rear extension and first floor side extension with car port Applicant : Mr Carmine Tulino

Application No : 19/00728/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 26 Southend Road Hockley SS5 4QH Proposal : Subdivide plot and construct two four bedroomed detached houses to front of Evelyn Road Applicant : Mr M Reddan - Reddan Contractors

Page 14 of 22 Application No : 19/00730/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful Development Certificate Location : 51 Hamilton Gardens Hockley SS5 5BX Proposal : Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for a Proposed use - Hip to gable rear dormer loft conversion Applicant : Mr Kieran Western

Page 15 of 22

Application No : 19/00731/ADV Decision : Grant Advertisement Consent Location : The Rayleigh Weir Arterial Road Rayleigh Proposal : Two illuminated gable end signs, one illuminated totem sign, one illuminated welcome sign, two non-illuminated "V" signs and one non-illuminated directional sign. Applicant : Mr Tyldesley - HARVESTER

Application No : 19/00733/FUL Decision : Refuse Planning Permission Location : 7A Eldon Way Hockley SS5 4AD Proposal : Application to vary condition 2 to application for mixed use as a youth facility and ancillary uses for training and B1 office purposes as approved on 5th May 2011 under application Ref: 11/00123/COU From - 2. The use hereby approved shall be restricted to use as a youth club (including ancillary use for conference and training) and for no other use within use classes D1 or D2 of the Use Classes Order 1987 (Or as otherwise amended). To - 2. The use hereby approved shall be restricted to use as a gym and fitness centre. (Including ancillary use for conference and training) and for no other use within Classes D1 or D2 of the Use Classes Order 1987 (or as otherwise amended).

Applicant : Mr Chris Jones - ART LimitedTitans Health And Fitness

Reason(s) for Refusal

1 Insufficient information has been provided by the applicant to enable the conclusion to be reached that the site would provide adequate on-site parking provision. Without adequate on-site parking the proposed use may give rise to on-street parking to the detriment of other users of the Eldon Way Industrial Estate. The proposal would fall contrary to Policy T8 of the Development Management Plan.

Application No : 19/00739/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 35 Teignmouth Drive Rayleigh SS6 9PE Proposal : Single Storey Rear Extension Applicant : Mrs Vijay Ratten

Page 16 of 22

Application No : 19/00740/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : The Day Nursery Church Road Rawreth Proposal : Application for continued siting of two removable classrooms for a further period of five years Applicant : Mr Raymond Mitchell - The Day Nursery

Application No : 19/00743/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 25 Great Wheatley Road Rayleigh SS6 7AW Proposal : Demolition of existing dwelling and construct detached three storey four bedroomed house Applicant : Mr & Mrs S Makris

Application No : 19/00746/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful Development Certificate Location : 44 Love Lane Rayleigh SS6 7DX Proposal : Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for a Proposed use - Single storey rear extension Applicant : Mr & Mrs O'Leary

Application No : 19/00748/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 35 Hill Lane Hawkwell SS5 4HW Proposal : Single storey rear extension Applicant : Mr Gary Sawyer

Application No : 19/00752/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 78 Southview Road Hockley Essex Proposal : Single Storey Rear Extension Applicant : Mr James Mclean

Application No : 19/00755/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 322 Little Wakering Road Little Wakering SS3 0LA Proposal : Single storey timber outbuilding for use as a garden room Applicant : Stephanie Coster

Application No : 19/00758/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful Development Certificate Location : 2 Potash Cottages Hall Road Rochford Proposal : Application for a certificate of lawfulness for proposed single storey rear extension Applicant : Mrs Heaver

Page 17 of 22 Application No : 19/00762/DOC Decision : Discharge Of Conditions Location : Avonside Eastwood Rise Eastwood Proposal : Discharge condition 6 (Landscaping) on planning permission 19/00076/FUL

Applicant : Hilton Homes

Application No : 19/00764/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 2 Belgrave Close Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Construct Two Storey Side and Rear Extension, Single Storey Rear and Front Extension and Garage Conversion Applicant : Mr Barry Taylor

Application No : 19/00774/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 2 Rookery Close Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Alter and extend roof at first floor, demolish existing extension and rebuild with room in the roof, alterations to fenestration Applicant : Mr And Mrs Fleming

Application No : 19/00773/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 28 Highams Road Hockley SS5 4DG Proposal : Proposed single storey side/rear extension with roof lantern, relocation of entrance door, and aesthetic alterations Applicant : Mr & Mrs Gajewska

Application No : 19/00786/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval Required - Refused Location : Ayrshire The Chase Ashingdon Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear Extension. Projection 8m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 2.4m, Maximum Height 4m Applicant : Mr & Mrs Cox

Reason(s) for Refusal

1 The proposal exceeds these limits as it would extend off of an existing side extension to the eastern flank. As a result the proposal would be viewed as a side extension and would have a width greater than half the width of the original dwellinghouse, exceeding the limits of paragraph A.1(j) and A.1(ja).

Page 18 of 22

Application No : 19/00782/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 41 Keswick Avenue Hullbridge SS5 6JL Proposal : Ground and first floor, side and rear extension Applicant : Mr & Mrs Johnson

Application No : 19/00788/NMA Decision : Application Permitted Location : 54 Hillcrest Avenue Hullbridge Essex Proposal : Application for a non-material amendment following 18/01161/FUL to allow for use of cladding to front dormer Applicant : Mr Barrie Galloway

Application No : 19/00787/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval Required - Approved Location : 21 Victory Lane Rochford Essex Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear Extension. Projection 3.8m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 2.4m, Maximum Height 3.47m Applicant : Mr D Smith

Application No : 19/00790/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval of Details Not Required Location : 138 Victoria Avenue Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear Extension. Projection 4.2m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 3m, Maximum Height 4.0m Applicant : Mr And Mrs Tundell

Application No : 19/00797/LDC Decision : Refuse Lawful Development Certificate Location : 34 Eastbury Avenue Rochford SS4 1SF Proposal : Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for a Proposed use - ground floor rear extension Applicant : Mr Jamie Wilkins

Reason(s) for Refusal

1 The proposed rear extension would extend beyond a side wall of the original dwellinghouse and would have a width greater than half the width of the original dwellinghouse contrary to part (j) of Class A of Part 1 Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended). The proposal would fall to be considered under part (g) of the aforementioned Class and must therefore comply with conditions at Section A.4; no application has been applied for as required by this part.

Page 19 of 22

Application No : 19/00798/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval of Details Not Required Location : 47 Poplar Road Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear Extension. Projection 3.5m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 2.75m, Maximum Height 2.75m Applicant : Mr L Argles

Application No : 19/00803/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 120 Little Wakering Road Little Wakering SS3 0JH Proposal : Retrospective application for garage conversion to form an annexe Applicant : Mr R Benham

Application No : 19/00807/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : Ballards Gore Road Ballards Gore Proposal : Proposed Front elevations alteration to create glazed gable and hip to gable roof extension Applicant : Mr Alan Davis

Application No : 19/00810/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval Required - Approved Location : 3 Goose Cottages Chelmsford Road Rawreth Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear Extension. Projection 6m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 2.54m, Maximum Height 3m Applicant : Mr D West

Application No : 19/00811/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 52 Southbourne Grove Hockley SS5 5EE Proposal : Single storey rear extension with roof lantern Applicant : Mr Terry White

Application No : 19/00823/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 29 Brook Road Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Two storey sloped roofed side/rear extension and internal alterations Applicant : Mr Paul Shuttleworth - Equal People Performing Arts

Application No : 19/00828/FUL Decision : Application Permitted Location : 3 Sunnyfield Gardens Hockley SS5 4SL Proposal : Part conversion of garage and rear elevation alterations Applicant : Mr & Mrs Arnold

Page 20 of 22

Application No : 19/00831/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval of Details Not Required Location : 10 Laburnum Close Hockley Essex Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear Extension. Projection 6m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 3m, Maximum Height 3.9m Applicant : Mr V Liakas And Mrs V Grammatikopoulou

Application No : 19/00833/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval Required - Approved Location : 5 Bramfield Road West Rayleigh Essex Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear Extension. Projection 4.5m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 3m, Maximum Height 3.5m Applicant : Mr J Martin And M Hammond

Application No : 19/00835/LDC Decision : Grant Lawful Development Certificate Location : 43 Folly Lane Hockley SS5 4SE Proposal : Application for a Lawful Development Certificate for a proposed detached garage Applicant : Mr Graham Meldrum

Application No : 19/00893/NMA Decision : Application Permitted Location : Land At Rear Of 4 To 10 Golden Cross Road Rochford Proposal : Non material amendment following grant of planning permission 19/00225/FUL dated 28th August 2019 for the erection of a 1.8m high close boarded fence to the eastern boundary of the site Applicant : Network Construction GB1 Ltd - Mr Martin Keys

Application No : 19/00857/DPDP1 Decision : Prior Approval of Details Not Required Location : 68 Southend Road Rochford Essex Proposal : Householder Prior Approval for Single Storey Rear Extension. Projection 6m from Original Rear Wall, Eaves Height 3m, Maximum Height 3.4m Applicant : Mr Zammit

Application No : 19/00878/DOC Decision : Discharge Of Conditions Location : 151 Lower Road Hullbridge SS5 6BH Proposal : Discharge of conditions no 3 and 7 of application 19/00131/FUL dated 12/06/2019 Applicant : Mr Nick White

Page 21 of 22

Application No : 19/00925/NMA Decision : Application Permitted Location : 12 Mendip Close Rayleigh SS6 8AL Proposal : Non-material amendment following approved application 19/00224/FUL dated 14th May 2019 reduce extension to 6 metres Applicant : Mr Chris Wren

Application No : 19/00894/NMA Decision : Application Permitted Location : The Old Parsonage Ironwell Lane Hawkwell Proposal : Application for a non-material amendment following a grant of planning permission 19/00129/FUL dated 26th April 2019 - Amendments to rear fenestration, replacing existing windows and doors with French doors as shown on drawing 2852_05B. Also removal of horizontal boarding to the first floor and garage, with ground floor render extended full height (already approved under discharge of conditions) Applicant : Mr And Mrs Carter

Page 22 of 22