Salt on the Ohio Valley Frontier, 1770-1820 Author(S): John A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Salt on the Ohio Valley Frontier, 1770-1820 Author(S): John A Salt on the Ohio Valley Frontier, 1770-1820 Author(s): John A. Jakle Source: Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 59, No. 4 (Dec., 1969), pp. 687- 709 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. on behalf of the Association of American Geographers Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2561834 Accessed: 24-08-2015 17:36 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. and Association of American Geographers are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Annals of the Association of American Geographers. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.163.2.206 on Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:36:05 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SALT ON THE OHIO VALLEY FRONTIER, 1770-1820' JOHNA. JAKLE Universityof Illinois, Urbana ABSTRACT. Salt, available at natural springs, seasonally attracted great herds of bison which throughyears of repetitiousmovement carved an extensivesystem of buffalo traces: avenues used by Anglo-Americansin settlingportions of the Ohio Valley. Frontier settlementconcentrated in areas of salt availability as the vital dietary element proved necessaryto sustain livestockand to prepare meats, thus providing the frontierfarmer with an exportcommodity. Salt was used as a medium of exchange enabling merchants to pursue a diversifiedcommerce centered in urban places; indeed, the salt trade, more than any other commercialactivity, sustained the Valley's early urban structure. FREDERICK JACKSONTURNER formu- whichpatterns of sequent occupance emerged. lated the initial generalizationsrelating Turner wrote:5 salt to the Ohio Valley's frontierexperience.2 Standat CumberlandGap andwatch the procession In his epic paper, Turnertheorized that a gen- of civilizationmarching single file the buffalo eral lack of salt retardedwestward migration; followingthe trails to saltsprings, the Indian, the he wrote: "The early settlerswere tied to the furtrader and hunter,the cattle-raiser, the pioneer coast by the need of salt, withoutwhich they farmer-andthe frontier has passedby. could not preservetheir meats or live in com- Historians have been hesitant to follow fort."3Conversely, he noted that salt availa- Turner'slead in furtheringthe investigationof bilitystimulated frontier expansion:4 salt and its influence on frontiersettlement Whendiscovery was made of the salt springs of the and economy. Local historiansand antiquar- Kanawhaand the Holston,and Kentucky,and ians have detailed pioneer salt productionin centralNew York,the West began to be freed certain highly restrictedlocalities; however, fromdependence on thecoast. It was partof the treatmentof the has re- effectof findingthese salt springsthat enabled larger region been settlementto crossthe mountains. strictedto individualarticles by Akeley,Clark, and Lippincott,supplemented only by several Finally,he noted thatthe buffalopaths which unpublishedmasters' theses.6 Readily embrac connected the larger salines funneledthe ini- tial American migrationinto specific settle- 5Turner, op. cit., footnote2, p. 12. ment areas providing the frameworkupon "Works on local salt productioninclude: B. W. Hager, "The Whites of Clay County As Salt Acceptedfor publication May 23, 1968. Makers,"Register of the KentuckyState Historical Society,Vol. 50 (1952), pp. 242-48; W. P. Jillson, Big Bone Lick (Louisville, Kentucky: Standard 1'This paper presentsthe basic themesfrom the PrintingCo., 1936); R. E. McDowell,"Bullitt's Lick: author'sdissertation, Salt and the Initial Settlement the RelatedSalt Worksand Settlements,"Filson Club of the Ohio Valley (unpublishedPh.D. dissertation, HistoryQuarterly, Vol. 30 (1956), pp. 240-69; J.F. Indiana University,1967). The author wishes to Smith,"The Salt MakingIndustry of Clay County," thankProfessors 0. P. Starkey,D. Carmony,N. J. G. Filson Club HistoryQuarterly, Vol. 2 (1927), pp. Pounds,T. D. Clark, and W. Zelinskyfor theiren- 134-40; M. Threlkel,"Mann's Lick," Filson Club couragementand timelysuggestions at variousstages HistoryQuarterly, Vol. 2 (1927), pp. 169-76; and R. of the project. R. White,"The Salt Industryof Clay County,Ken- tucky,"Register of the KentuckyState HistoricalSo- 2 F. J. Turner,"The Significanceof the Frontier ciety,Vol. 50 (1952), pp. 237-41. Regional cover- in American History,"Proceedings of the State His- age is offeredby: A. P. Akeley,"Salt and the Early torical Society of Wisconsin,Vol. 41 (1893); re- Settlers,"Pennsylvania History, Vol. 12 (1945), pp. printedin The FrontierIn AmericanHistory (New 170-73; T. D. Clark,"Salt, A Factorin the Settlement York: Holt, Rinehart,and Winston,1962), p. 17. of Kentucky,"Filson Club HistoryQuarterly, Vol. 12 3 Turner,op. cit.,footnote 2, p. 17. (1938), pp. 42-52; I. Lippincott,"Early Salt Trade 4 Turnerop. cit.,footnote 2, p. 18. in the Ohio Valley,"Journal of PoliticalEconomics, 687 This content downloaded from 128.163.2.206 on Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:36:05 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 688 JOHN A. JAKLE December ing Turner's generalizationsconcerning pio- factorof settlementon the Americanfrontier neer salt economy,these studies have tended has been largelyignored althoughShaler and to emphasize the Valley's mid-nineteenthcen- Rostlund have investigatedthe bison's pene- turycommercial salt industryby focusingon trationinto the easternwoodlands, a penetra- the evolution of modern production tech- tion in which salt played an importantrole niques. Thus Turner's overview of salt's im- Zelinsky has mapped the salt-derivedplace- portanceon the frontierstands unassailed. name,"lick," in his generalstudy of the generic The failure to pursue salt as a theme of parts of place-names.10 settlementhistory stems partially from the In light of past endeavor, this paper is of- generallack of materialsdescriptive of frontier fered as a re-evaluationof the Ohio Valley's settlementpatterns. Although manuscript ma- frontiersalt thesis. It will proceed from a terials are available, little has been done to descriptionof the Valley's salt resourceto con- evaluate their content. In addition, few ar- siderationof the derived buffalo-tracesystem chaeological surveyshave been made to sup- and its impact on Americansettlement. The plementthe historicalrecord; indeed, only for managementof the Valley's salt resourcewill Pennsylvania,where two surveyshave been then be related to the growthof towns and completed,does a reliable record of the num- cities forthe salt trade,as it fosteredcommer- ber, composition,and distributionof pioneer cial enterprise,and alteredthe region'soriginal settlementsexist.7 Lacking even for frontier settlementfabric. As such, the paper will re- Pennsylvania, however, are maps detailing ject certain of Turner'swidely held generali- basic transportationfacilities such as trail, zations regardingsalt and settlement,accept road, and river routes along which initial others with varyingdegrees of qualification, settlementaccrued. Even though such con- and suggest futureresearch direction. siderationsare essentiallyencyclopedic in na- ture, they are prerequisiteto continued con- THE SALT LICKS sideration of salt and the other natural re- Salt was readilyavailable in the Ohio Valley sourcesimportant during the frontierperiod. at what the early hunterscalled "salt licks." Here geographers can contribute greatly. Imlay, a geographerof the early Trans-Appa- Concerned with pioneer settlementin diverse lachian West, wrote:1" areas of the world, American geographers seem well equipped to furtherdescribe and A salt springis called a "Lick," fromthe earth about thembeing furrowedout in a most curious analyze past pioneerconditions here at home.8 mannerby the buffaloand deer, which lick the Indeed, historicalgeographers have taken no- earthon accountof the saline particleswith which tice in their journals of the comprehensive it is impregnated. frontierliterature produced by historiansand Commonly,a lick was an actual springwhere have related much of their own research di- saliferouswaters evaporated on reaching the rectlyto that literature.9However, salt as a surfaceto precipitatedeposits of sodium chlo- ride. Yet the physicalappearance of the vari- Vol. 20 (1912), pp. 1029-52. Theses include: M. ous springs differedaccording to the micro- R. Hoge, "Salt on the Frontier"(unpublished M.A. thesis,University of Pittsburgh,1931); and M. W. environmentsinvolved; thus, descriptionsof Mosby,"Salt Industryin the Kanawha Valley" (un- publishedM.A. thesis,University of Kentucky,1950). FrontierHistory," Annals, Associationof American 7W. A. Hunter,Forts on the PennsylvaniaFron- Geographers,Vol. 50 (1960), pp. 62-74. tier, 1753-1758 (Harrisburg,Pennsylvania: Penn- 10N. S. Shaler,"The Age of the Bison in the Ohio sylvaniaHistorical and Museum Commission,1960); Valley," KentuckyGeological Survey,Memoire, Vol. and T. L. Montgomery,Report to the Commissionto 1 (1876); E. Rostlund,"The GeographicRange of the Locate the Sites of the FrontierForts of Pennsyl- HistoricBison in the Southeast,"Annals, Association vania (Harrisburg,Pennsylvania: W. S. Ray, 1916). of AmericanGeographers, Vol.
Recommended publications
  • The Changing Technology of Post Medieval Sea Salt Production in England
    1 Heritage, Uses and Representations of the Sea. Centro de Investigação Transdisiplinar Cultura, Espaço e Memoría (CITCEM) Porto, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, 20-22 October 2011. The changing technology of post medieval sea salt production in England Jeremy Greenwood Composition of seawater Sea water contains 3.5% evaporites of which salt (sodium chloride) comprises 77.8%. The remainder is known as bittern as it includes the bitter tasting, aperient and deliquescent sulphates of magnesium (Epsom salt) and sodium (Glauber’s salt) as well as about 11% magnesium chloride. 2 Successful commercial salt making depends on the fractional crystallisation of seawater producing the maximum amount of salt without contamination by bittern salts. As seawater is evaporated, very small amounts of calcium carbonate are precipitated followed by some calcium sulphate. This is followed by the crystallisation of sodium chloride but before this is complete, bitter Epsom salt appears; something that needs to be avoided.1 In Continental Europe, evaporation of sea water is achieved solely by the energy of the wind and sun but this is not possible in the English climate so other techniques were developed. 1 http://www.solarsaltharvesters.com/notes.htm SOLAR SALT ENGINEERING 3 Evaporation vessel Briquetage The earliest known English method of coastal saltmaking has been found in the late Bronze Age. This involved boiling seawater in crude clay dishes supported by clay firebars (briquetage) and was widespread in Europe. This technique continued into the Iron Age and into the Roman period with variations inevitably occurring in the industry, although the dating of saltworks is very problematical.2 Detailed interpretation continues to be a matter of dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2021
    January 2021 Holly Hill 21 January 2021 Purchasing Manager Kenton County Fiscal Court 1840 Simon Kenton Way Covington, KY 41011 RE: Licking River Blue Water Trail Study Ms. Hill, Copperhead Environmental Consulting, Inc. (Copperhead) is pleased to submit the attached proposal to analyze approximately 122 miles of river and stream associated with the Licking River from Paris, Kentucky to the Ohio River to evaluate the potential for outdoor recreation and tourism. We have assembled a team of biologists, GIS specialists, archeologists, economic developers, recreational specialists, planners, and watershed specialists to support this project. Along with Copperhead biologists, planners, and writers, we have partnered with Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. for archeological and historical services, EHI Consultants to support economic analyses and plan development, OutrageGIS Mapping to support mapping, and the University of Kentucky to develop initial outreach products for this project. Our multi-faceted expertise makes us ideally suited to serve your environmental service needs. The following document outlines select project experience examples and implementation plans. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or clarifications needed. Sincerely, Marty Marchaterre Environmental Planner (859) 684-9387 [email protected] OVERVIEW Kentucky’s natural resources are a tourism draw for residents of the Commonwealth and visitors alike. The Licking River watershed is home to navigable waters, interesting plant and animal species, attractive geological features, fascinating historical and archeological stories, and an overall natural beauty. The Licking River, along with the South Fork of the Licking River and Stoner Creek from Paris, Kentucky to the Ohio River near Cincinnati, Ohio (hereafter referred to as the Study Corridor), has the potential to be promoted for outdoor recreation and tourism through fishing, boating, bird watching, heritage tourism, and educational opportunities, to name a few.
    [Show full text]
  • South Fork of the Licking River Rapid Watershed Assessment
    South Fork of the Licking River Rapid Watershed Assessment Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUC) 05100102 October 2008 USDA-NRCS, Lexington, Kentucky South Fork of the Licking River near Cynthiana, KY Photo: Tom Leith, USDA Kentucky Rapid Watershed Assessment, 2008_______________________________________________________Page 1 of 36 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………….3 Geology and Soils……………………………………………………………………5 Threatened and Endangered Species………………………………………………6 Land Use/Land Cover……………………………………………………………….7 County Data………………………………………………………………………… 9 Stakeholder Participation and Conservation Needs…………………………….. 10 Prime Farmland Soils……………………………………………………………... 13 Highly Erodible Land………………………………………………………………15 Hay and Pasturelands……………………………………………………………... 16 Croplands…………………………………………………………………………... 17 Hydric Soils………………………………………………………………………… 19 Wildlife Priority Conservation Areas…………………………………………….. 21 Water Resources…………………………………………………………………… 23 List of Impaired Streams………………………………………………………….. 26 Sinkholes…………………………………………………………………………….28 Demographics……………………………………………………………………… 29 NRCS Conservation Program Data…………………………………………..….. 30 References…………………………………………………………………………..34 Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) United State Department of Agriculture (USDA) Suite 210, 771 Corporate Drive, Lexington, KY 40503 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation,
    [Show full text]
  • Active Surface Salt Structures of the Western Kuqa Fold-Thrust Belt, Northwestern China
    Active surface salt structures of the western Kuqa fold-thrust belt, northwestern China Jianghai Li1, A. Alexander G. Webb2,*, Xiang Mao1, Ingrid Eckhoff2, Cindy Colón2, Kexin Zhang2, Honghao Wang1, An Li2, and Dian He2,† 1The Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, Ministry of Education, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA ABSTRACT fold-thrust belt display a variety of erosion- dynamics of salt motion. Although geo scientists tectonics interactions, with nuances refl ect- have interpreted thousands of salt sheets in The western Kuqa fold-thrust belt of Xin- ing the low viscosity and high erodibility of more than 35 basins worldwide (Hudec and jiang Province, China, hosts a series of surface salt, including stream defl ections, potential Jackson, 2006, 2007), subaerial preservation of salt structures. Here we present preliminary tectonic aneurysm development, and even halite salt structures is rare (Talbot and Pohjola, analysis of the geometry, kinematics, and sur- an upper-crustal test site for channel fl ow– 2009; Barnhart and Lohman, 2012). A fraction face processes of three of these structures: the focused denudation models. of these subaerial salt structures occur in active Quele open-toed salt thrust sheet, Tuzima- settings, where boundary conditions of ongoing zha salt wall, and Awate salt fountain. The INTRODUCTION deformation can be geodetically characterized. fi rst two are line-sourced, the third appears The Kuqa fold-thrust belt of Xinjiang Prov- to be point-sourced, and all are active. The Among common solid Earth materials, salt is ince, northwestern China, offers a new prospect ~35-km-long, 200-m-thick Quele open-toed distinguished by uncommonly low density, low for subaerial investigation of a range of active salt thrust sheet features internal folding, viscosity, near incompressibility, high solubil- salt structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Ventures in Salt: Compass Minerals International Rebecca M
    08-064 July 10, 2009 Ventures in Salt: Compass Minerals International Rebecca M. Henderson, John Sterman, Ramana Nanda As Michael Ducey, the President and CEO of Compass Minerals International, looked out of his office in Overland Park, Kansas on the evening of December 11, 2003, he wondered how investors would react to his company going public. Ducey had joined Compass Minerals in April 2002 as CEO and strategic investor, a few months after the private equity firm Apollo Management had acquired it from IMC Global.1 Although salt companies were not typical candidates for IPOs, Compass Minerals had done very well in its two years as a stand-alone firm, and Ducey had encouraged his fellow investors to consider exiting via an IPO. With Goldman Sachs leading its IPO the following day, Ducey considered the response of investors and his strategy going forward. Where should he be focusing his attention? How could he ensure that the company lived up to the high expectations of its investors? A Short History of Salt Salt was one of the most widely used minerals in the world. Although it had thousands of applications, in the United States it was primarily used for highway deicing, and as an input into the chemicals, food-processing, water-treatment, and agricultural industries. 1 Although some parts of the current operations of Compass Minerals go back over a hundred years, its most recent structure arose from a series of ownership changes that began in 1998. On April 1, 1998 IMC Global purchased the salt and chemicals businesses of Harris Chemical Group ($450 MM in cash and $950 MM raised in debt), including the North American Salt Company, the Great Salt Lake Minerals Corp in the US, and Salt Union in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles for Counties in the Licking
    Major Licking River Watershed County Profiles The Licking River Watershed or River Basin physically includes Magoffin*, Morgan*, Rowan*, Bath*, Fleming*, Bourbon, Harrison*, Nicholas*, Robertson*, the majority of Pendleton*, and parts of Menifee*, Montgomery, Clark, Elliott, Lewis, Mason, Bracken, Campbell*, Kenton*, Boone, and Grant counties.1 The Licking River Region report also includes Gallatin and a portion of Carroll counties. Hinkston and Stoner Creeks join in Bourbon County to form the South Fork of the Licking River which joins the main stem in Falmouth. The North Fork joins the Licking River near Sunrise, north of Claysville, in Harrison County, around its northern border with Pendleton County. The North Fork forms the border between Bracken and Robertson counties. The Licking River was officially discovered by Thomas Walker in June of 1750 who named it Frederick’s River. The Native Americans called it Nepernine and used the river to transport goods for trade and to travel to the central Kentucky grassland areas for hunting. Charles Kerr’s History of Kentucky (1922) says that the Licking means “land with springs and meadows.” An earlier name, Great Salt Lick Creek, referred to the salt licks along the river. The Licking River was first officially surveyed in 1835. The Licking River is noted to be 320 miles long. The Licking River was an important route of transportation for timber operations that floated logs down the river to Covington. Cave Run Lake, the only impoundment on the river, was formed in 1974. It has a summer pool of approximately 8,200 acres. Cave Run Lake is one of the most productive muskie fisheries in the Eastern United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843
    Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org $4.00 TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Background 03 Trails and Settlements 03 Shelters and Dwellings 04 Clothing and Dress 07 Arts and Crafts 08 Religions 09 Medicine 10 Agriculture, Hunting, and Fishing 11 The Fur Trade 12 Five Major Tribes of Ohio 13 Adapting Each Other’s Ways 16 Removal of the American Indian 18 Ohio Historical Society Indian Sites 20 Ohio Historical Marker Sites 20 Timeline 32 Glossary 36 The Ohio Historical Society 1982 Velma Avenue Columbus, OH 43211 2 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio HISTORICAL BACKGROUND In Ohio, the last of the prehistoric Indians, the Erie and the Fort Ancient people, were destroyed or driven away by the Iroquois about 1655. Some ethnologists believe the Shawnee descended from the Fort Ancient people. The Shawnees were wanderers, who lived in many places in the south. They became associated closely with the Delaware in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Able fighters, the Shawnees stubbornly resisted white pressures until the Treaty of Greene Ville in 1795. At the time of the arrival of the European explorers on the shores of the North American continent, the American Indians were living in a network of highly developed cultures. Each group lived in similar housing, wore similar clothing, ate similar food, and enjoyed similar tribal life. In the geographical northeastern part of North America, the principal American Indian tribes were: Abittibi, Abenaki, Algonquin, Beothuk, Cayuga, Chippewa, Delaware, Eastern Cree, Erie, Forest Potawatomi, Huron, Iroquois, Illinois, Kickapoo, Mohicans, Maliseet, Massachusetts, Menominee, Miami, Micmac, Mississauga, Mohawk, Montagnais, Munsee, Muskekowug, Nanticoke, Narragansett, Naskapi, Neutral, Nipissing, Ojibwa, Oneida, Onondaga, Ottawa, Passamaquoddy, Penobscot, Peoria, Pequot, Piankashaw, Prairie Potawatomi, Sauk-Fox, Seneca, Susquehanna, Swamp-Cree, Tuscarora, Winnebago, and Wyandot.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalog of Hydrologic Units in Kentucky
    James C. Cobb, State Director and Geologist Kentucky Geological Survey UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY CATALOG OF HYDROLOGIC UNITS IN KENTUCKY Daniel I. Carey 2003 CONTENTS HYDROLOGIC UNITS.............................................................................................................................................................................4 Ohio River Basin - Region 05 (38,080 sq. mi.)..........................................................................................................................................5 Big Sandy River Basin - Subregion 0507 (2,290 sq. mi.) ......................................................................................................................5 Big Sandy River - Accounting Unit 050702 (2,290 sq. mi.)...........................................................................................................5 Big Sandy River - Catalog Unit 05070201 (478 sq. mi.) ..............................................................................................................5 Upper Levisa Fork - Catalog Unit 05070202 (359 sq. mi.).........................................................................................................7 Levisa Fork - Catalog Unit 05070203 (1,116 sq. mi.)...............................................................................................................12 Big Sandy River, Blaine Creek - Catalog Unit 05070204 (337 sq. mi.).......................................................................................18 Tygarts Creek, Little Sandy River,
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Potential of Hydroelectric Power in Kentucky
    An Analysis of the Potential of Hydroelectric Power in Kentucky A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the College of Science and Technology Morehead State University In Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Science Morehead State University by Terry White June 15, 2007 J T\ ) VI ~ I rlC-.)C:-} 3 3 3. 9 /'-; W 5 880..; Accepted by the faculty of the College of Science and Technology, Morehead State University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree. l'lLJ z~rJ <11'i Director of Thesis Master's Committee: A ~~ ZQ rf e:Jr/ , Chair u Date An Analysis of Hydroelectric Power in Kentucky Terry White Morehead State University 2007 Director of Thesis: J:J/1'11 t1-J. zar 1CK ft J ABSTRACT Problem Statement The research presented in this thesis attempted to explore the possible use of hydropower as an alternative energy resource for the local area of Morehead, Kentucky and for the state of Kentucky in order to provide a possible alternative to the continued dependence on fossil fuels. This study attempted to analyze the potential energy of hydropower if it were implemented at the Triplett Creek Dam, the Cave Run Lake Dam, and at a total of various sites across the state of Kentucky. Methodology The researcher utilized different methods of analysis to address each of the four research questions. The first step in the assessment of the potential of a hydroelectric system was to determine the amount of obtainable power at all of the potential sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Military History of Kentucky
    THE AMERICAN GUIDE SERIES Military History of Kentucky CHRONOLOGICALLY ARRANGED Written by Workers of the Federal Writers Project of the Works Progress Administration for the State of Kentucky Sponsored by THE MILITARY DEPARTMENT OF KENTUCKY G. LEE McCLAIN, The Adjutant General Anna Virumque Cano - Virgil (I sing of arms and men) ILLUSTRATED Military History of Kentucky FIRST PUBLISHED IN JULY, 1939 WORKS PROGRESS ADMINISTRATION F. C. Harrington, Administrator Florence S. Kerr, Assistant Administrator Henry G. Alsberg, Director of The Federal Writers Project COPYRIGHT 1939 BY THE ADJUTANT GENERAL OF KENTUCKY PRINTED BY THE STATE JOURNAL FRANKFORT, KY. All rights are reserved, including the rights to reproduce this book a parts thereof in any form. ii Military History of Kentucky BRIG. GEN. G. LEE McCLAIN, KY. N. G. The Adjutant General iii Military History of Kentucky MAJOR JOSEPH M. KELLY, KY. N. G. Assistant Adjutant General, U.S. P. and D. O. iv Military History of Kentucky Foreword Frankfort, Kentucky, January 1, 1939. HIS EXCELLENCY, ALBERT BENJAMIN CHANDLER, Governor of Kentucky and Commander-in-Chief, Kentucky National Guard, Frankfort, Kentucky. SIR: I have the pleasure of submitting a report of the National Guard of Kentucky showing its origin, development and progress, chronologically arranged. This report is in the form of a history of the military units of Kentucky. The purpose of this Military History of Kentucky is to present a written record which always will be available to the people of Kentucky relating something of the accomplishments of Kentucky soldiers. It will be observed that from the time the first settlers came to our state, down to the present day, Kentucky soldiers have been ever ready to protect the lives, homes, and property of the citizens of the state with vigor and courage.
    [Show full text]
  • 05/1983 Trip Report of Tour of Retsof Mine, Ontario, Canada
    Department of Energy National Waste Terminal Storage Program Office JUL 1 3 1983 505 King Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43201 Mr. Hubert S. Miller S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Willste Building 7915 Eastern Avenue Silver Springs, MD 20910 Dear Mr. Miller: TRIP REPORT OF TOUR OF RETSOF MINE Enclosed for your information is a trip report which may be of interest to you. Also enclosed are abstracts from the Sixth International Symposium of Salt. J.O. Neff Program Manager NWTS Program Office NPO:JON:LAC:kgh Enclosures: 1) June 9, 1983 trip report by 0. Swanson and R. Helgerson to distribution 2) Abstracts from the Sixth International Symposium on Salt in Toronto, Canada ST# 405-83 TBAB: GE Heim (On Travel) S Goldsmith SD-83-97 REPORTONOFFICIALTRAVEL RECD JUN 1 6 1983 [COULD NOT BE CONVERTED TO SEARCHABLE TEXT] S Goldsmith GE Heim WE Newcomb JO Neff/NPO (3) SD Files WA Carbiener OE Swanson MA Balderman TA Baillieul/NPO LB SC Matthews RN Helgerson DL Ballmann ONWI Files Purpose of trip: Attend the Sixth International Symposium on Salt and tour Retsof Mine Attendees: See attached list. Essential details of trip and summary of results obtained: Retsof Mine Tour The production shaft of the Retsof Bedded Salt Mine now in use was completed in 1922. This 9 x 28 foot shaft was apparently put down using conventional mining techniques. The present mine encompasses approximately 5,000 acres and has been in continuous operation since 1885. Some 95,000,000 tons of salt have been removed since operations began. The mine remains at a near constant 63F year round with little reported condensate in the ventilated air flow.
    [Show full text]
  • Lyons Salt; a Century of Mining in Rice County Number of Years
    Ly o n s ne w s • PL a i n s & Pr o g r e s s Bu s i n e s s & in d u s t r y Ja n u a r y 30, 2018 9B Lyons Salt; a century of mining in Rice County number of years. The mine shaft was installed a conveyer belt and shut Salt Company celebrated 1,000,000 sunk in Ellsworth but down 250 ft. down the old rail cars. How salt is man hours without a single time- when water broke in above, the proj- acquired has vastly changed over loss injury, a monumental feat in ect was abandoned.” The third shaft the past 100 years. In the early 20th the industry. This single undertak- at Lyons, which was 2 miles west of century traditional mining using a ing took seven years to achieve. the present Lyons shaft, was aban- pickaxe as well as blasting. These The milestone equates to one doned many years ago. The two other were the preferred methods. When shafts in Lyons were sunk in 1890 blasting, charges were placed in and the other started in 1916. “The drilled holes and fired off. Today American was started by a George although traditional mining has long Kelley in 1916, under the name of gone away, blasting is still in use the American Salt & Coal Co.” This with more sophisticated preparation. later became Lyons Salt Company. In the modern age there are A photo of some of the original inves- The Lyons Salt Company complex several preliminary steps prior to tors in the Lyons Salt plant.
    [Show full text]