Chapter 3 Weather Patterns of British Columbia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fraser River from Source to Mouth
FRASER RIVER FROM SOURCE TO MOUTH September 5, 2017 - 11 Days Fares Per Person: $3395 double/twin $4065 single $3210 triple > Please add 5% GST. Early Bookers: $160 discount on first 12 seats; $80 on next 8 > Experience Points: Earn 76 points from this tour. Redeem 76 points if you book by July 5. Includes Flight from Victoria to Kelowna St. John the Divine Church in Yale Coach transportation for 10 days Harrison Hot Springs pools 10 nights of accommodation & hotel taxes Copper Room music & dancing with Jones Boys Helicopter to the source of the Fraser River Fraser River Safari boat excursion Fraser River raft float trip (no white water) Paddlewheeler cruise from New Westminster Huble Homestead tour to the mouth of the Fraser River Farwell Canyon and pictographs Gulf of Georgia Cannery National Historic Site Cariboo Chilcotin Museum Transfer from New Westminster to Victoria Hat Creek Historic Ranch and roadhouse tour Knowledgeable tour director Hell’s Gate Airtram Luggage handling at hotels Alexandra Suspension Bridge 21 meals: 8 breakfasts, 9 lunches, 4 dinners Activity Level This is a unique tour with lots of activity and time outdoors while you experience many aspects of the Fraser River. The trip to the source of the Fraser requires getting in and out of a helicopter, and walking about ½ km in an alpine meadow at 2,000 metres altitude. On other days, you are boarding a large raft and two boats. Walks in- clude Farwell Canyon pictographs, Alexandra Bridge, and the boat dock to Kilby Store. This tour has activity ranging from somewhat rigorous to sedentary. -
Okanagan Valley
OKANAGAN VALLEY DESTINATION DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY HIGHLIGHTS MYRA CANYON Photo: Grant Harder THANK WHAT’S YOU INSIDE The Okanagan Valley Destination Thank you to our tourism partners 1. INTRODUCTION Development Strategy is the outcome who participated in the process by of a nineteen-month, iterative process attending community meetings, 2. REALIZING THE POTENTIAL of gathering, synthesizing, and participating in surveys and validating information with tourism interviews, engaging in follow-up 3. AT A GLANCE partners about the current status conversations, and forwarding 4. GEARING UP and future direction of tourism in relevant documents and insights. the Okanagan Valley planning area. Special thanks to the members of the Working Group, as well as the We thank the Syilx people and the facilitator of the destination Okanagan Nation on whose traditional development process. territories we gathered for meetings in Kelowna and Summerland. OKANAGAN VALLEY | 2 1 INTRODUCTION WHY A STRATEGY? District, and part of electoral area E (West Boundary) the creation of a provincial destination development of the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary. strategy thereby ensuring a truly integrated and The Okanagan Valley Destination Development Municipalities include Lake Country, Kelowna, West cohesive combination of bottom-up and top-down Strategy was developed to enhance the competitiveness Kelowna, Peachland, Summerland, Penticton, Oliver, destination planning. of the Okanagan Valley planning area over the next 10 Keremeos, and Osoyoos. The planning area includes years and beyond. The strategy was developed as part most of the Okanagan Valley, Sakha Lake, and the of Destination BC’s Destination Development Program Okanagan River. A KEY IMPERATIVE to support and guide the long-term growth of tourism in British Columbia. -
Chief Raymond Arcand Alan Paul Edwin Paul CEO Alexander First Nation Alexander First Nation IRC PO Box 3419 PO Box 3510 Morinville, AB T8R 1S3 Morinville, AB T8R 1S3
Chief Raymond Arcand Alan Paul Edwin Paul CEO Alexander First Nation Alexander First Nation IRC PO Box 3419 PO Box 3510 Morinville, AB T8R 1S3 Morinville, AB T8R 1S3 Chief Cameron Alexis Rosaleen Alexis Chief Tony Morgan Alexis Nakota Sioux First Nation Gitanyow First Nation PO Box 7 PO Box 340 Glenevis, AB T0E 0X0 Kitwanga, BC V0J 2A0 Fax: (780) 967-5484 Chief Alphonse Lameman Audrey Horseman Beaver Lake Cree Nation HLFN Industrial Relations Corporation PO Box 960 Box 303 Lac La Biche, AB T0A 2C0 Hythe, AB T0H 2C0 Chief Don Testawich Chief Rose Laboucan Ken Rich Driftpile First Nation Duncan’s First Nation General Delivery PO Box 148 Driftpile, AB T0G 0V0 Brownvale, AB T0H 0L0 Chief Ron Morin Chief Rick Horseman Irene Morin Arthur Demain Enoch Cree Nation #440 Horse Lake First Nation PO Box 29 PO Box 303 Enoch, AB T7X 3Y3 Hythe, AB T0H 2C0 Chief Thomas Halcrow Kapawe’no First Nation Chief Daniel Paul PO Box 10 Paul First Nation Frouard, AB T0G 2A0 PO Box 89 Duffield, AB T0E 0N0 Fax: (780) 751-3864 Chief Eddy Makokis Chief Roland Twinn Saddle Lake Cree Nation Sawridge First Nation PO Box 100 PO Box 3236 Saddle Lake, AB T0A 3T0 Slave Lake, AB T0G 2A0 Chief Richard Kappo Chief Jaret Cardinal Alfred Goodswimmer Sucker Creek First Nation Sturgeon Lake Cree PO Box 65 PO Box 757 Enilda, AB T0G 0W0 Valleyview, AB T0H 3N0 Chief Leon Chalifoux Chief Leonard Houle Ave Dersch Whitefish Lake First Nation #128 Swan River First Nation PO Box 271 PO Box 270 Goodfish Lake, AB T0A 1R0 Kinuso, AB T0G 0W0 Chief Derek Orr Chief Dominic Frederick Alec Chingee Lheidli T’enneh McLeod Lake Indian Band 1041 Whenun Road 61 Sekani Drive, General Delivery Prince George, BC V2K 5X8 McLeod Lake, BC V0J 2G0 Grand Chief Liz Logan Chief Norman Davis Kieran Broderick/Robert Mects Doig River First Nation Treaty 8 Tribal Association PO Box 56 10233 – 100th Avenue Rose Prairie, BC V0C 2H0 Fort St. -
Ecosystem Classification and Interpretation of the C.3 Sub-Boreal Spruce Zone, Prince Rupert Forest Region, British Columbia
Ecosystem Classification and Interpretation of the c.3 Sub-Boreal Spruce Zone, Prince Rupert Forest Region, British Columbia by J. Pojar', R. Trowbridge', and D. Coates2 'Ministry of Forests 2Ministry of Forests Research Section Silviculture Section Prince Rupert Forest Region Prince Rupert Forest Region Bag 5000 Bag 5000 Smithers. B.C. Smithers, B.C. VOJ 2N0 VOJ 2N0 Province of British Columbia Ministry of Forests ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Numerous individualsassisted in the various phases ofthis report. D.J. Wilford managed theprogram in its first few years. K. Awmack, A. Banner, M. Blouw, W. Chapman, A. Deas, S. Haeussler, D. Holmes, R. Laird, A. Macadam, K. McKeown, M. O'Neill, L. Ricciotti, 6. Robinson, J. Schwab, 0.Wilford, and D. Yolehelped carry out field work. S. Lindeburghand B.M. Geislercontributed tothe Interpretations sections of theguide. J. van Barneveld and 0. Meidingerreviewed the manuscript and provided many usefulsuggestions. G. Bishop, P. Frank, P. Nystedt,and P. Sowden did most ofthe illustrations. F. Boasand J. Godfrey identified some ofthe bryophytes. Final editing and preparationof the report was by W. Taylor and K. McKeown. M. Romeo, and C. Huismanand J. Taekema did the typing andword processing, respectively. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................... 1 2.0 OBJECTIVES ........................................................... 4 3.0 PRINCIPLES AND PHILOSOPHY ............................................ 5 3.1 Ecosystem ...................................................... -
C02-Side View
FULTON RESERVOIR REGULATING BUILDING ACCESS STAIR REPLACEMENT REFERENCE ONLY FOR DRAWING LIST JULY 30, 2019 Atlin ● Atlin Atlin C00 COVER L Liard R C01 SITE PLAN C02 SIDE VIEW Dease Lake ● Fort ine R ● S1.1 GENERAL NOTES AND KEY PLAN kkiii Nelson tititi SS S3.1 DETAILS SHEET 1 S3.2 DETAILS SHEET 2 S3.3 DETAILS SHEET 2 Stewart Fort St ●Stewart Hudson’s John Williston Hope John L ● New Dawson● Creek Dixon upert Hazelton ● ● ● Entrance cce R Mackenzie Chetwynd iiinn Smithers ● Terrace Smithers Masset PrPr ● ● ● ● ● Tumbler Ridge Queen ttt Kitimat Houston Fort Ridge iii Kitimat ●Houston ● ● Charlotte sspp Burns Lake ● St James dds Burns Lake San Fraser R ●● a Fraser Lake ● ● Fraser R Haida Gwaii HecateHecate StrStr Vanderhoof ● Prince George McBride Quesnel ● Quesnel ● ● Wells Bella Bella ● Valemount● Bella Bella ● Bella Williams Valemount Queen Coola Lake Kinbasket Charlotte ● Kinbasket L Sound FraserFraserFraser R RR PACIFIC OCEAN ColumbiaColumbia ●100 Mile Port House Hardy ● ● Port McNeill Revelstoke Golden ●● Lillooet Ashcroft ● Port Alice Campbell Lillooet RR Campbell ● ● ● ● River Kamloops Salmon Arm ● Vancouver Island Powell InvermereInvermere ●StrStr Whistler Merritt ●Vernon Nakusp Courtenay ●River ● ● ●Nakusp ● Squamish Okanagan Kelowna Elkford● Port ofofSechelt ● ●Kelowna Alberni G ● L Kimberley Alberni eeoror Vancouver Hope Penticton Nelson ● Tofino ● ● giagia ● ● ● ● ee ● ● ● Castlegar Cranbrook Ucluelet ● oo ● ksvillvillm o● ●Abbotsford Osoyoos Creston Parks aim ● ●Trail ●Creston Nan mithithith ●Sidney Ladys ●Saanich JuanJuan -
AUTHORIZATION for the RELEASE of HEALTH RECORDS Please Fax Or Mail Your Completed Request to Each Hospital/Facility You Are Requesting Records From
AUTHORIZATION FOR THE RELEASE OF HEALTH RECORDS Please fax or mail your completed request to each hospital/facility you are requesting records from. ATTENTION: Health Information Management, Release of Information Office Part 1. Patient / Resident Information LAST NAME OF PATIENT FIRST NAME ALSO KNOWN AS / ALIAS MAILING ADDRESS CITY / PROVINCE / COUNTRY POSTAL CODE TELEPHONE NO. (INCLUDING AREA CODE) DATE OF BIRTH DAY | MONTH | YEAR PERSONAL HEALTH NUMBER (CARECARD) | | Part 2. Records Requested HOSPITAL(S)/FACILITY: □ VISIT SUMMARY □ EMERGENCY VISIT INFORMATION □ DIAGNOSTIC REPORTS (LAB/RADIOLOGY) □ PROOF OF VISIT □ OUTPATIENT □ OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY): (fees may apply) DATE(S) OF RECORDS REQUESTED: ______________________ TO ___________________________________________ If you do not know exact dates please provide your best estimate Part 3. Person Receiving Records □ MYSELF OR □ NAME OF PERSON RECEIVING THE RECORDS NAME OF COMPANY OR ORGANIZATION (IF APPLICABLE) (LAST, FIRST) MAILING ADDRESS CITY / PROVINCE / COUNTRY POSTAL CODE TELEPHONE NO. (INCLUDING AREA CODE) RECORDS TO BE: □ MAILED □ PICKED UP (Picture ID Required) Part 4. Patient Authorization (12 years of age or older) I, the patient, authorize the Hospital(s)/Facility to release the records requested to the person named in the “Person Receiving Records” section. SIGNATURE OF PATIENT: ___________________________________________ DATE SIGNED: ____________________________ Part 5. Authorization on behalf of Patient (Please complete page 2 of form) (If patient is under 12 years of age or unable to authorize the release of personal information.) By signing below I confirm that I have legal authority to act on behalf of the patient and I hereby authorize the Hospital(s)/Facility to release the records requested to the person named in the “Person Receiving Records” section. -
(1987): "Tectonomagmatic Evolution of Cenozoic Extension in the North American Cordillera"
Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by Frances J Cooper on January 21, 2013 Geological Society, London, Special Publications Tectonomagmatic evolution of Cenozoic extension in the North American Cordillera Brian P. Wernicke, Philip C. England, Leslie J. Sonder and Robert L. Christiansen Geological Society, London, Special Publications 1987, v.28; p203-221. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1987.028.01.15 Email alerting click here to receive free e-mail alerts when service new articles cite this article Permission click here to seek permission to re-use all or request part of this article Subscribe click here to subscribe to Geological Society, London, Special Publications or the Lyell Collection Notes © The Geological Society of London 2013 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by Frances J Cooper on January 21, 2013 Tectonomagmatic evolution of Cenozoic extension in the North American Cordillera B.P. Wernicke, R.L. Christiansen, P.C. England & L.J. Sonder SUMMARY: The spatial and temporal distributions of Cenozoic extension and magmatism in the Cordillera suggest that the onset of major crustal extension at a particular latitude was confined to a relatively narrow belt (< 100 km, pre-extension) and followed the onset of intermediate and silicic magmatism by no more than a few million years. Extension began in early Eocene time in southern British Columbia, northern Washington, Idaho and Montana. Farther S, extension began at about the Eocene- Oligocene boundary in the Great Basin and slightly later in the Mojave-Sonora Desert region. The intervening area, at the latitude of Las Vegas, remained quiescent until mid- Miocene time. Compositional and isotopic characteristics of most pre-Miocene magmas are consistent with their containing major components of melted continental crust. -
Basin Architecture of the North Okanagan Valley Fill, British Columbia
BASIN ARCHITECTURE OF THE NORTH OKANAGAN VALLEY FILL, BRITISH COLUMBIA sandy Vanderburgh B.Sc., University of Calgary I984 M.Sc., University of Calgary 1987 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Geography 0 Sandy Vanderburgh SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY July 1993 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL ' Name: Sandy Vanderburgh Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title of Thesis: Basin Architecture Of The North Okanagan Valley Fill, British Columbia Examining Committee: Chair: Alison M. Gill Associate Professor Dr. M.C. Roberts, Protessor Senior Supervisor Idr. H. Hickin, professor Dr. Dirk Tempelman-Kluit, Director Cordilleran Division, Geological Survey of Canada Dr. R.W. Mathewes, Professor, Department of Biological Sciences Internal Examiner Dr. James A. Hunter, Senior scientist & Program Co-ordinator, Terrain Sciences Division Geological Survey of Canada External Examiner Date Approved: Julv 16. 1993 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE 8* I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, projector extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. -
A Nitrogen Budget for the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, with Emphasis on Particulate Nitrogen and Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen
Biogeosciences, 10, 7179–7194, 2013 Open Access www.biogeosciences.net/10/7179/2013/ doi:10.5194/bg-10-7179-2013 Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. A nitrogen budget for the Strait of Georgia, British Columbia, with emphasis on particulate nitrogen and dissolved inorganic nitrogen J. N. Sutton1,2, S. C. Johannessen1, and R. W. Macdonald1 1Institute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 9860 West Saanich Road, P.O. Box 6000, Sidney, British Columbia, V8L 4B2, Canada 2Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA Correspondence to: J. N. Sutton ([email protected]) Received: 6 March 2013 – Published in Biogeosciences Discuss.: 23 April 2013 Revised: 29 September 2013 – Accepted: 10 October 2013 – Published: 12 November 2013 Abstract. Balanced budgets for dissolved inorganic N (DIN) 1 Introduction and particulate N (PN) were constructed for the Strait of Georgia (SoG), a semi-enclosed coastal sea off the west coast of British Columbia, Canada. The dominant control on the The nitrogen (N) cycle is a crucial underpinning of marine N budget is the advection of DIN into and out of the SoG biological productivity (Gruber and Galloway, 2008). Dur- via Haro Strait. The annual influx of DIN by advection from ing the past 150 yr, the global N cycle has been dramati- the Pacific Ocean is 29 990 (±19 500) Mmol yr−1. The DIN cally changed by human activities that have loaded reactive N flux advected out of the SoG is 24 300 (±15 500) Mmol yr−1. into ecosystems in amounts that rival natural sources (Rabal- Most of the DIN that enters the SoG (∼ 23 400 Mmol yr−1) ais, 2002; Galloway et al., 2004). -
Rural Food and Wine Tourism in Canada's South Okanagan Valley
sustainability Article Rural Food and Wine Tourism in Canada’s South Okanagan Valley: Transformations for Food Sovereignty? Danielle Robinson 1,2 1 School of Business, Okanagan College, BC V1Y 4X8, Canada 2 Community, Culture and Global Studies, Irving K. Barber Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, V1V 1V7, Canada; [email protected] Abstract: This interdisciplinary research analyses the relationships between food sovereignty prin- ciples and food and wine tourism in rural contexts by asking how rural tourism stakeholders understand these concepts, mobilize the interrelationships, and to what purpose. Wine and food tourism is one of the fastest-growing rural tourism niches, with effects on the orientation of food systems, the livelihoods of producers, the viability of rural communities, and the biophysical environ- ment. Secondary research and semi-structured interviews provide insights into how qualities of food sovereignty transitions are conceptualized, recognized, developed, supported, and promoted in the case of British Columbia’s South Okanagan Valley. An appreciative approach was used because this research aims to understand rural food and wine tourism’s potential contribution to food sovereignty. Although the term ‘food sovereignty’ did not resonate for most participants, qualities of a transition towards food sovereignty such as reorienting agriculture, food processing and consumption to the local region, supporting rural economies and environmental sustainability were considered integral to rural food tourism. Participants saw future opportunities for rural food and wine tourism to serve broader transformative purposes that would benefit locals, visitors, and the environment. Research results could be used to inspire critical academic, community and policy dialogue about food sovereignty in wine and food tourism destinations. -
Fraser Valley Geotour: Bedrock, Glacial Deposits, Recent Sediments, Geological Hazards and Applied Geology: Sumas Mountain and Abbotsford Area
Fraser Valley Geotour: Bedrock, Glacial Deposits, Recent Sediments, Geological Hazards and Applied Geology: Sumas Mountain and Abbotsford Area A collaboration in support of teachers in and around Abbotsford, B.C. in celebration of National Science and Technology Week October 25, 2013 MineralsEd and Natural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada Led by David Huntley, PhD, GSC and David Thompson, P Geo 1 2 Fraser Valley Geotour Introduction Welcome to the Fraser Valley Geotour! Learning about our Earth, geological processes and features, and the relevance of it all to our lives is really best addressed outside of a classroom. Our entire province is the laboratory for geological studies. The landscape and rocks in the Fraser Valley record many natural Earth processes and reveal a large part of the geologic history of this part of BC – a unique part of the Canadian Cordillera. This professional development field trip for teachers looks at a selection of the bedrock and overlying surficial sediments in the Abbotsford area that evidence these geologic processes over time. The stops highlight key features that are part of the geological story - demonstrating surface processes, recording rock – forming processes, revealing the tectonic history, and evidence of glaciation. The important interplay of these phenomena and later human activity is highlighted along the way. It is designed to build your understanding of Earth Science and its relevance to our lives to support your teaching related topics in your classroom. Acknowledgments We would like to thank our partners, the individuals who led the tour to share their expertise, build interest in the natural history of the area, and inspire your teaching. -
Draft Navigability Report for Stikine River
United States Department of the Interior IJ:::.~ ~ .. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT "\ TAKE PRIDE" Alaska State Office INAMERICA 222 W. 7th Avenue, # 13 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599 http://www.ak.blm.gov To: File AA-085787 (1864) From: Navigable Waters Specialist Subject: Navigability ofStikine River, Southeast Alaska On February 17, 2005, the State of Alaska (State) filed an application for a recordable disclaimer of interest for the bed of the Stikine River from its mouth to the United States-Canada International Boundary, a distance of approximately 27 miles. The State also applied for lands underlying "all named interconnecting sloughs including Binkleys Slough, Red Slough, Guerin Slough, King Slough, Andrew Slough, Hooligan Slough, Shakes Slough, Shakes Lake, North Arm, and Ketili River, between the ordinary high water lines of the left and right banks .... " The State included with its application a legal description of the river, supporting evidence, and a map dated April 5, 2004 showing the Stikine River.l The State's submissions are more fully described in Attachment A. On June 4, 2007, the State submitted additional information in support of its application for the bed ofthe Stikine River. In this letter, the State asserted that the Tongass National Forest did not include the beds of navigable waters within the exterior boundaries of the reserve and, therefore, did not defeat the State's title to the bed ofthe navigable Stikine River.2 As the State's evidence shows, the Stikine River has been used almost continuously as a highway of commerce since before the Purchase of Alaska in 1867. Both Great Britain and the United States recognized the river's importance as a highway in the Washington Treaty of May 8, 1871.