DIABETES/ RESEARCH AND REVIEWS REVIEW ARTICLE Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.1223

Management strategies for gastrointestinal, erectile, bladder, and sudomotor dysfunction in patients with diabetes

P. Kempler1∗ G. Amarenco2 Summary R. Freeman3 S. Frontoni4 M. Horowitz5 M. Stevens6 There are substantial advances in understanding disordered gastrointestinal P. Low7 R. Pop-Busui8 autonomic dysfunction in diabetes. It occurs frequently. The underlying A. A. Tahrani9,10 S. Tesfaye11 pathogenesis is complex involving defects in multiple interacting cell types of T. Varkonyi´ 12 D. Ziegler13,14 the myenteric plexus as well. These defects may be irreversible or reversible. P. Valensi15 on behalf of The Gastrointestinal symptoms represent a major and generally underestimated Toronto Consensus Panel on source of morbidity for escalating health care costs in diabetes. Acute Diabetic Neuropathy† changes in glycaemia are both determinants and consequences of altered 1I Department of Medicine, Semmelweis gastrointestinal motility. 35–90% of diabetic men have moderate-to-severe University, Budapest, Hungary 2Service erectile dysfunction (ED). ED shares common risk factors with CVD. Diagnosis de Neuro-Urologie, Hˆopital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hˆopitaux de Paris, is based on medical/sexual history, including validated questionnaires. Paris, France 3Beth Israel Deaconess Physical examination and laboratory testing must be tailored to patient’s Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, complaints and risk factors. Treatment is based on PDE5-inhibitors (PDE5- Boston, MA, USA 4Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tor I). Other explorations may be useful in patients who do not respond Vergata, Rome, Italy 5Discipline of to PDE5-I. Patients at high cardiovascular risk should be stabilized by Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia 6Department of their cardiologists before sexual activity is considered or ED treatment is Medicine, University of Birmingham, recommended. Birmingham, UK 7Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA 8Division of Estimates on bladder dysfunction prevalence are 43–87% of type 1 and 25% Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, of type 2 diabetic patients, respectively. Common symptoms include dysuria, Brehm Center for Diabetes Research, frequency, urgency, nocturia and incomplete bladder emptying. Diagnosis University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 9Department of Diabetes and should use validated questionnaire for lower urinary tract symptoms. The type Endocrinology, Heart of England NHS of bladder dysfunction is readily characterized with complete urodynamic Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK 10School of Clinical and Experimental testing. Medicine, University of Birmingham, Sudomotor dysfunction is a cause of dry skin and is associated with foot Birmingham, UK 11Diabetes Research Unit, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, ulcerations. Sudomotor function can be assessed by thermoregulatory sweat Sheffield, UK 12First Department of testing, quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test, sympathetic skin response, Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, quantitative direct/indirect axon reflex testing and the indicator plaster. Hungary 13Institute for Clinical Diabetology, German Diabetes Center, Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research, Heinrich Heine University, D¨usseldorf, Germany 14Department of Metabolic Keywords gastroparesis; gastrointestinal autonomic neuropathy; erectile Diseases, University Hospital, D¨usseldorf, dysfunction; sudomotor dysfunction; bladder dysfunction Germany 15Service d’Endocrinologie-Diab´etologie-Nutrition, AP-HP, Hˆopital Jean Verdier, Paris-Nord University, CRNH-IdF, Bondy, France Abbreviations AGE – advanced glycation end products; BPH – benign pro- static hyperplasia; CAN – cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy; cGMP – ∗ Correspondence to: P. Kempler, I cyclic guanosine monophosphate; CVD – cardiovascular disease; DPN – Department of Medicine, Semmelweis diabetic polyneuropathy; DBSQ – Diabetes Bowel Symptom Question- University, 1083 Budapest, Koranyi´ Sandoru.2/a,Hungary´ naire; GIP – gastro inhibitory polypeptide; GLP – glucagon-like pep- E-mail: [email protected] tide; HRV – heart rate variability; ICC – interstitial cells of Cajal; †See Appendix for Members of The LDF – laser Doppler flowmetry; LDPI – laser Doppler perfusion imag- Toronto Consensus Panel on Diabetic ing; LSCI – laser speckle contrast imaging; LUTS – lower urinary tract Neuropathy. symptoms; MBF – microvascular blood flow; NOS – nitric oxide syn- thase; PDE5-I – phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor; PGE1 – prostaglandin Received : 12 April 2011 E1; PMN – polymorphonuclear leukocyte; PVR – postvoid residual vol- Accepted: 6 June 2011 ume; QDIRT – quantitative direct and indirect axon reflex testing;

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 666 P. Kempler et al.

QoL – quality of life; QSART – quantitative sudomotor control, while acute hyperglycaemia has been shown axon reflex test; RCT – randomized controlled trial; to increase the perception of gastrointestinal sensations. SFN – small fibre neuropathy; SSEP – somatosensory- Symptoms occur more frequently in patients with mark- evoked potentials; SSR – sympathetic skin response; ers of psychological disorders. Symptom ‘turnover’ occurs TST – thermoregulatory sweat testin frequently [2]. While patients with symptomatic gastro- paresis utilize substantially more healthcare resources than diabetic patients without gastroparesis, moderate Introduction gastroparesis does not appear to be a rapidly progres- sive disease and is not associated with poor adverse In this article, gastrointestinal, erectile, bladder and prognosis [2]. sudomotor dysfunction are reviewed. Disorders such as Gastric emptying rate is of fundamental importance neuroarthropathy, hypoglycaemia unawareness, neuro- to postprandial glycaemia, accounting for at least a pathic oedema and pupillary abnormalities, which are in third of the variance of the initial rise, as well part due to autonomic dysfunction, are not covered in this as the peak blood glucose response to carbohydrate- article. containing meals in healthy subjects, and patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Gastric emptying rate is also a determinant of the incretin hormone responses Gastrointestinal autonomic which further affect postprandial glycaemia [5,6]. Even minor changes in the rate of carbohydrate delivery neuropathy to the small intestine can have a substantial effect on glycaemia [6]. In insulin-treated patients nutrient Epidemiology delivery needs to be matched with the action of exogenous insulin and delayed gastric emptying has Disordered gastrointestinal motility in diabetes may be recently been documented as an important cause of associated with gastrointestinal symptoms, impaired oral otherwise unexplained hypoglycaemia – a phenomenon drug absorption, poor glycaemic control, malnutrition called ‘gastric’ hypoglycaemia [7]. In contrast, in type and abnormal postprandial regulation of blood pressure. 2 diabetic patients not treated with insulin, a delayed Reports on the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms carbohydrate absorption is often beneficial for glycaemic and disordered motility in diabetes are inconsistent control. reflecting, partly, variations in methodology and the Diabetes is also associated with a high prevalence populations studied. Gastrointestinal symptoms impact of disordered small and large intestinal, and anorectal negatively on health-related quality of life and women motility [8]. Either delayed or rapid small intestinal appear to be affected more frequently. The relationships transit may be observed and may influence carbohydrate among symptoms, disordered gastrointestinal motility absorption. Diarrhoea is reported by up to 20% of and CAN are relatively weak. patients and may reflect rapid or slow transit, frequently Oesophageal transit, as measured using radionuclide complicated by bacterial overgrowth. There is little ∼ techniques, is delayed in 50% of patients with information about colonic function in diabetes, but longstanding diabetes, but does not correlate closely with constipation has been reported in up to 60% of patients delayed gastric emptying [1]. Other than acid reflux, with longstanding diabetes [8]. An increased prevalence oesophageal dysfunction can result in regurgitation, of faecal incontinence, particularly nocturnal, is related dysphagia and a propensity for pill-induced oesophageal to reduced and unstable internal anal sphincter tone, erosions and structures. impaired rectal compliance and sensation. Gastroparesis, defined as a delayed gastric emptying in the absence of an obstructive aetiology, is arguably the most important manifestation of gastrointestinal auto- Pathogenesis nomic neuropathy affecting about 30–50% of outpatients with longstanding type 1 or type 2 diabetes [1,2]. The Gastrointestinal motor, sensory and secretory functions prevalence is highest when gastric emptying of both are modulated by the interaction of autonomic and enteric solids and nutrient-containing liquids is quantified [1,2]. nervous systems with underlying rhythmicity generated Abnormally rapid gastric emptying was also described in by the so-called ICC located within the smooth muscle. diabetes [3]. Symptoms of gastroparesis usually relate The autonomic nervous system provides extrinsic inner- to impaired gastric relaxation and ‘hypersensitivity’ to vation of gut function, via parasympathetic (vagal and gastric distension. Only postprandial fullness appears to pelvic) and sympathetic (mesenteric) nerves. Parasympa- be a significant predictor of delayed gastric emptying thetic innervation is both excitatory () and of solids. Symptoms attributable to gastroparesis are inhibitory (non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic), whereas reported in 5–12% of diabetic patients in the commu- sympathetic input is generally inhibitory, with the excep- nity, but higher rates are evident in patients evaluated tion of the lower oesophageal and anal sphincters. The in tertiary referral centres [4]. Symptoms seem to be pathogenesis of gastrointestinal ‘autonomic neuropathy’ more common in those with poor chronic glycaemic is now recognized to be complex and multifactorial with

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr Gastrointestinal AN, Erectile, Bladder, and Sudomotor Dysfunction in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus 667 defects in various interacting cell types and potentially, for 48–72 h prior to the test, smoking should be avoided reversible, functional abnormalities, in addition to the on the test day and the blood glucose concentration should more established roles of autonomic neuropathy and acute be monitored and ideally be >4and<10 mmol/L during hyperglycaemia. the test [11]. Failure to demonstrate delayed gastric Data from the NIH-funded Gastroparesis Clinical emptying need not imply that symptoms are not due Research Consortium have contributed significantly to to ‘diabetic gastropathy’. knowledge of the role of cellular defects underlying dis- Scintigraphy is still regarded as the ‘gold standard’ ordered gut function, particularly the pathogenesis of technique for measurement of gastric emptying. The gastroparesis. Documented changes include reduced num- intragastric distribution of a meal, which is frequently bers of ICC, deficiencies of inhibitory neurotransmission, abnormal in diabetic patients, can also be evaluated. reduced numbers of extrinsic autonomic neurons and The level of standardization of the technique between smooth muscle [9]. Loss of dysfunction of ICC appears centres is a major limitation, rectified to some extent to be central to the pathogenesis of diabetic gastroparesis by recent ‘consensus’ guidelines which recommend a [10]. In animal models and humans with diabetic gastro- low-fat, egg white meal labelled with 99 mTc sulfur paresis, a reduction in intraneuronal levels of nitric oxide colloid and consumed with jam and toast as a sandwich, has been observed. with a glass of water [2]. If carbohydrate is included Acute variations in glycaemia have a major impact in the meal the relationship between glycaemic response on gut motor function in both healthy and diabetic and gastric emptying rate can be evaluated [1]. The subjects [5]. In type 1 patients, marked hyperglycaemia limitations of scintigraphy are exposure to a modest (16–20 mmol/L) slows gastric emptying of solids and dose of radiation, the relative expense and the need nutrient-containing liquids substantially. Even within the for specialist centres. physiological postprandial glycaemic range, the rate of Breath test results using non-radioactive 13C-acetate gastric emptying is slower at a blood glucose of 8 mmol/L or -octanoic acid as a label are safe, inexpensive and than 4 mmol/L, in healthy subjects and patients with correlate well with scintigraphy results [2,13]. uncomplicated type 1 diabetes [11]. In contrast, insulin- Ultrasonography is a non-invasive diagnostic method induced hypoglycaemia accelerates gastric emptying even and two-dimensional ultrasound has been validated in type 1 patients with gastroparesis. Hyperglycaemia also for measuring emptying of liquids and semi-solids. increases the perception of gastrointestinal symptoms Three-dimensional ultrasound offers, however, a more in patients with diabetes [12]. Potential mediators comprehensive imaging of the total stomach. Magnetic of the effects of glycaemia on gut motility include resonance imaging has been used to measure gastric impaired vagal function, altered prostaglandin synthesis, emptying and motility with excellent reproductivity, changes in nitric oxide mechanisms and both central but its use is limited to research purposes. Surface and peripheral glucose-responsive neurons. The effects of electrogastrography should be considered currently as variations in glycaemia in type 2 diabetes are less well a research tool. A barium meal has a place in evaluating documented. mucosal lesions or obstruction. Pressure measurements assessing motor function of the stomach, small intestine and colon correlate relatively well with scintigraphy Diagnosis results [13]. Manometry should be considered as a research technique to investigate gastric and intestinal Studies of the autonomic neuropathy in diabetes, whether motility. Tests of anorectal motor and sensory functions performed for clinical, epidemiological or research pur- are well developed for clinical use. poses, may potentially focus on gastrointestinal symp- toms, QoL, gastrointestinal motility/transit, glycaemic control and/or postprandial blood pressure. A num- Management ber of measurements are available to quantify gas- trointestinal symptoms, including the DBSQ, which has Gastrointestinal symptoms been validated in a diabetic population. QoL measures The management of patients with symptomatic diabetic have not focused specifically on the gastrointestinal gastrointestinal autonomic neuropathy should focus on tract. relief of gastrointestinal symptoms, improvement in Due to the poor predictive value of symptoms, objective nutritional status and optimization of glycaemic control. measurements of gastric emptying are advocated for the Patients with type 1 diabetes may benefit from insulin diagnosis of gastroparesis. Evaluation of solid emptying is pump therapy. probably more sensitive than that of low-nutrient liquid Patients with disordered oesophageal motility asso- or semi-solid meals. However, some patients will only ciated with reflux should be managed conventionally, exhibit delay to liquid meals. Gastric emptying can be usually with proton pump inhibitors. Fluids should be affected acutely by many factors, including , consumed immediately after medications to minimize the smoking and blood glucose concentrations. Other causes possibility of pill-induced oesophagitis. of gastroparesis must be excluded. Medications that may In patients with symptomatic gastroparesis, low- influence gastric emptying should ideally be withdrawn fat/fibre diets are frequently advocated, but their use is

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr 668 P. Kempler et al. empirical. Prokinetic drugs, including , Non-pharmacological strategies include dietary modifi- erythromycin and , are the mainstay of cations to slow gastric emptying by increasing dietary treatment. Their effect is due to the stimulation fibre and the use of fat or protein ‘preloads’ taken before of release in the myenteric plexus to a meal [18]. The rationale for the latter approach is properties or by stimulating motilin to slow gastric emptying by stimulating small intestinal receptors in the gut. The acceleration of gastric neurohumoral feedback mechanisms and the release of emptying by prokinetics is greater if baseline emptying GIP and GLP-1 before the main meal. Slowing of gastric is more delayed and their effect is attenuated during emptying may be the predominant mechanism by which acute hyperglycaemia [14]. In a systematic analysis of exogenous GLP-1 and its analogues reduce postprandial clinical trials comparing various prokinetics, erythromycin glycaemia. The magnitude of slowing gastric emptying by appeared to be superior in accelerating gastric emptying exenatide is most marked when gastric emptying is more and relieving symptoms [15], but its long-term efficacy rapid and seems not to be attenuated by the presence of is limited by tachyphylaxis due to down-regulation of CAN [19]. motilin receptors, gastrointestinal adverse effects and, Postprandial hypotension occurs frequently in diabetes possibly, an increased risk of cardiac death. The adverse (probably more commonly than orthostatic hypotension). effects of the central nervous system are common and The magnitude of the fall in blood pressure is related irreversible tardive dyskinesia is a rare complication with directly to the rate of gastric emptying when small the use of metoclopramide. Domperidone is also effective intestinal carbohydrate delivery is more rapid, and the at relieving symptoms and may now be regarded as the fall in blood pressure is greater. Dietary pharmacological current ‘first-line’ agent, subsequent to restrictions in the strategies slowing gastric emptying and reducing small availability of due to arrhythmias related to QT intestinal carbohydrate absorption are likely to prove interval prolongation. Several drugs, including the motilin effective in the management and there is evidence that the agonist, mitemcinal, ghrelin and ghrelin receptor agonists, α-glucosidase inhibitor, acarbose, may be useful. Delayed 5HT4-receptor agonists and the , gastric emptying influences the delivery and absorption of acotiamide, are being currently investigated for their orally administered drugs in the small intestine, resulting potential use [10]. Non-pharmacological treatments in later, or fluctuating maximal serum concentrations. for diabetic gastroparesis are available. High-frequency This is particularly important if rapid onset drug action is gastric electrical stimulation with the Enterra device has required. been used widely, study results are controversial and have failed to provide conclusive evidence of benefit [16]. Benefits of surgical therapy for intractable gastroparesis remain uncertain. Uncontrolled observations support Summary and recommendations the benefit of pancreatic transplantation on gastric During the past 25 years there has been a substan- emptying. tial redefinition of concepts relating to the prevalence, The management of diarrhoea, constipation and clinical significance, pathogenesis and management of faecal incontinence is still largely symptomatic once ‘gastrointestinal autonomic neuropathy’ in diabetes. The specific causes like coeliac disease and exocrine pathogenesis is now recognized to be complex and het- pancreatic insufficiency are excluded [17]. Bacte- erogeneous. Gastrointestinal symptoms occur frequently rial overgrowth, implicated in up to 40% of dia- in diabetes and affect QoL adversely. Diabetes is the most betic patients with chronic diarrhoea, should be common cause of chronic gastroparesis affecting 30–50% treated with antibiotics. Patients with accelerated tran- sit or faecal incontinence may respond to loperamide, of patients with longstanding diabetes and the rate of which slows small and large intestinal transit and gastric emptying is a major determinant of postpran- increases internal anal sphincter tone [17]. In cases dial glycaemia. Management is frequently suboptimal and of severe diarrhoea somatostatin analogues may be should focus on the relief of gastrointestinal symptoms as effective. well as improvement in nutritional status and glycaemic control. 1. Inquire routinely about gastrointestinal symp- Glycaemic control toms (C). The novel insights relating to the impact of gastric emp- 2. Measure gastric emptying, by either scintigraphy or tying on glycaemia have stimulated the development stable isotope breath test, in patients with suspected of dietary and pharmacological strategies to improve gastroparesis (B). glycaemic control by modulating gastric emptying. The 3. Initiate therapy with a prokinetic drug and optimize relationship of glycaemia to small intestinal carbohy- glycaemic control in patients with symptomatic drate delivery is now recognized to be nonlinear, as gastroparesis (B). evidenced by the glycaemic response to intraduodenal 4. Recognize that gastroparesis may impact adversely infusion of glucose at rates within the normal range for on glycaemic control, particularly in insulin-treated gastric emptying in healthy and type 2 diabetic patients. patients (C).

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr Gastrointestinal AN, Erectile, Bladder, and Sudomotor Dysfunction in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus 669

Erectile dysfunction peripheral neuropathy (3.3 [2.9–3.8]), peripheral arte- rial disease (2.8 [2.4–3.3]), nephropathy (2.3 [1.9–2.8]), poor glycaemic control (2.3 [2.0–2.6]), retinopathy (2.2 Definition [2.0–2.4]), hypertension (2.1 [1.6–2.9]) and diabetes duration (2.0 [1.8–2.2]) [25]. However, even when neu- Erectile dysfunction is defined as persistent inability to ropathic complications are present, psychiatric illnesses achieve or maintain an erection sufficient to permit may be important contributors to erectile dysfunction in satisfactory sexual intercourse. Normal penile erection diabetic men. The aetiology of psychogenic erectile dys- is the result of a hemodynamic process and is depen- function includes anxiety, depression, sexual phobias and dent on corporal smooth muscle relaxation mediated by stress. Thus, psychogenic components must not be over- parasympathetic neurotransmission, nitric oxide, electro- looked. The key differences between psychogenic and physiologic events and other regulatory factors. organic erectile dysfunction are shown in Table 1. Erectile dysfunction is a well-recognized index of car- diovascular risk and an independent predictor of coronary Epidemiology artery disease. Prospective studies have shown that erec- tile dysfunction predicts the development of CVD [26] Erectile dysfunction prevalence among diabetic men and CVD mortality [27]. The risk of CVD associated with varies from 35 to 90% depending mainly on the popula- erectile dysfunction is in the range of risk associated tion studied and various methods applied. In a nationally with traditional CVD risk factors [27,28], such as current representative study from managed care claims in the US smoking, hypertension or family history of myocardial database, diabetes prevalence rates were 20.0% in men infarction, but erectile dysfunction does not improve the with erectile dysfunction and 7.5% in men without erec- prediction of who will and will not develop CVD beyond tile dysfunction [20]. The Cologne Male Survey noted a that offered by traditional risk factors. New onset or fourfold increase in erectile dysfunction in men with dia- progressive decline in erectile dysfunction should be con- betes compared to the general population. The presence sidered as an alarming marker of threatening ischaemic of diabetes was associated with an odds ratio for erec- heart disease even at asymptomatic stages. tile dysfunction by 3.95 (2.98–5.23). Erectile dysfunction Erectile dysfunction correlates significantly with the prevalence in the younger age groups (40–60 years) with severity of CAN among type 1 diabetic patients. Although diabeteswasashighasintheoldergroupsofnon-diabetic erectile dysfunction is associated with autonomic neu- subjects (60–80 years). In another survey, erectile dys- ropathy, erectile dysfunction prevalence in patients with function frequency among diabetic men aged 45–49 years CAN and the prevalence of CAN among patients with was similar to that in non-diabetic men aged over 70 years erectile dysfunction have not been analysed in large epi- [21]. In the EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study [22], demiological studies. 16% of patients (range: 2–35%) had problems with inter- Longitudinal studies are essential to assess the natural course, 16% (range: 2–85%) had problems obtaining an course of erectile dysfunction. In a 1-year longitudinal erection, 18% (range: 2–83%) had problems sustaining study [28], the health-related quality of life and erectile an erection, while 35% (range: 23-84%) had reported dysfunction severity were compared in men with and not to have erections at night or in the morning. Among without the history of diabetes. Diabetic men with a newly 713 men with type 1 diabetes participating in the Diabetes started erectile dysfunction treatment had favourable Control and Complication Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes results at 6 months, but the response to therapy was Interventions and Complications Study (DCCT/EDIC), not durable. In the study [29] with the highest number erectile dysfunction was present in 34%, orgasmic dys- of participants’ (n = 1456) deterioration in QoL just as function in 20% and decreased libido in 55% at year worsening of depressive symptoms preceded the onset of 10 of Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Com- erectile dysfunction. plications Study follow-up and after a mean diabetes duration of the cohort of 22.1 years [23]. The crude inci- dence rate of erectile dysfunction in the Massachusetts Pathogenesis Male Aging Study was 26 cases/1000 man-years in 847 men aged 40–69 without erectile dysfunction at base- The prominent role of neuropathy in the pathogen- line, who were followed for an average of 8.8 years [24]. esis of erectile dysfunction is mainly explained by The age-adjusted erectile dysfunction risk was higher for decreased smooth muscle relaxation of the corpus cav- men with lower education, diabetes, heart disease and ernosum and insufficient NOS function. The impaired hypertension. Erectile dysfunction incidence rate in dia- sensation of the glans and abnormal motor function betic men was increased twofold, with 50 cases/1000 of muscles participating in erection also contribute to man-years. In a study from Italy that included 9868 men erectile dysfunction development among patients with with diabetes, 45.5% of those aged >59 years reported neuropathy. Erectile dysfunction pathogenesis in dia- erectile dysfunction. Risk factors and clinical correlates betes is multifactorial, related to neuropathy, accelerated included the following (odds ratio [95% CI]): autonomic atherosclerosis and alterations in the corporal erectile neuropathy (5.0 [3.9–6.4]), diabetic foot (4.0 [2.9–5.5]), tissue, including smooth muscle degeneration, abnormal

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr 670 P. Kempler et al.

Table 1. The classification of erectile dysfunction: psychogenic or organic?

Aetiology Psychogenic Organic

Onset Sudden onset Gradual onset Initiation Complete immediate loss Incremental progression Morning erection Morning erections present Lack of morning erections Presence or absence under certain Varies with partner and circumstance Lack of erections under most sexually circumstances stimulating circumstances collagen deposition and endothelial cell dysfunction. AGE high risk should be stabilized by cardiological treatment have been shown to quench NO and to be elevated in before sexual activity is considered or erectile dysfunc- human diabetic penile tissue. tion treatment is recommended. The third step involves seeking all further risk factors of atherosclerosis in the presence of erectile dysfunction. Diagnosis Management Good clinical history and physical examination are the basis of assessment. It is important to establish the A stepwise therapeutic approach for erectile dysfunction nature of the erectile problem and to distinguish it from recently suggested by the European Association of Urology other forms of sexual difficulty such as penile curva- is shown in Figure 1 [32]. Even if the cause is organic, ture or premature ejaculation. An interview with the almost all men with erectile dysfunction are affected partner is advisable and will confirm the problem but psychologically. Sexual counselling is an important aspect may also reveal other causes ofdifficulties,e.g.vagi- of treatment and should also involve the partner. The nal dryness. The relative importance of psychological initial management should advise the patient to reduce and organic factors may be determined from the history. possible risk factors and optimize glycaemic control. Drugs associated with erectile dysfunction include tran- However, no studies have shown that improvement quillizers, antidepressants (tricyclics, selective serotonin in glycaemic control will exert a favourable effect on reuptake inhibitors) and antihypertensives (ß-blockers, erectile dysfunction. Lifestyle modification is associated vasodilators, central sympathomimetics, ganglion block- with improvement in erectile dysfunction in obese men. ers, diuretics, ACE inhibitors). Key diagnostic procedures Most men consider oral agents as the first treatment of erectile dysfunction include comprehensive history choice. First-line oral therapy includes PDE5-Is (sildenafil, (sexual, medical, drug use, risk factor assessment and psy- vardenafil and tadalafil) [32,33]. The mode of action chosocial factors) [30]. Routine laboratory tests should of PDE5-Is is delaying of cGMP degradation. Increased include HbA1c, fasting blood glucose and lipid profile. The cGMP level leads to decreased intracellular calcium levels, necessity of total testosterone (if available: bio-available thereby producing smooth muscle relaxation in corpus or free testosterone instead of total) measurement is cur- cavernosum and enhancement in blood flow resulting in rently discussed, but it is clearly necessary in patients who erection during sexual stimulus. do not respond to PDE5-Is. The use of validated question- Meta-analysis of trials comparing treatment with naires, such as the International Index of Erectile Function various PDE5-Is with placebo in diabetic patients and the Sexual Encounter Profile, is the most appropri- demonstrates the improvement of erectile dysfunction ate method to characterize frequency and severity of in diabetic men without reporting more frequent erectile dysfunction symptoms. Other explorations that cardiovascular adverse events. The use of PDE5-Is may be useful in patients who do not respond to PDE5- together with oral nitrates is contraindicated. The efficacy Is include evaluations of nocturnal penile tumescence, of PDE5-Is is independent of the duration of diabetes, penile Doppler ultrasound, bulbo-cavernosus reflex, dor- glycaemic control and microvascular complications. In sal sensory nerve conduction of the penis, amplitude and diabetic patients the proportion of subjects reporting latency of penile SSR, pudendal nerve SSEP, assessment improved erection following treatment with any PDE5-I of the effect of PGE1 on erection, psychological evalua- is lower compared to general population. tion and urodynamic studies. Cardiac risk factors should Daily use of 2.5 and 5 mg tadalafil for 12 weeks be evaluated and managed in all erectile dysfunction was well tolerated and significantly improved erectile patients. Three risk categories were established at the dysfunction in diabetic men [34]. However, these studies first and second Princeton Consensus Conferences [31]. lacked an on-demand treatment arm. Daily use of tadalafil After categorization of patients, an algorithm should be provides an alternative to on-demand dosing for couples followed according to individualized risk stratification. As who prefer spontaneous rather than scheduled sexual a first step sexual function assessment and initial cardio- activity [32]. vascular evaluation are recommended. The second step is Treatment options for patients who do not respond to initiate or resume sexual activity or indicate treatment to PDE5-Is or for whom PDE5-Is are contraindi- of erectile dysfunction in low-risk patients. Patients at cated include intracavernous injections, intraurethral

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr Gastrointestinal AN, Erectile, Bladder, and Sudomotor Dysfunction in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus 671

Figure 1. Treatment algorithm for erectile dysfunction in diabetic men (reproduced from Ref. [32]) alprostadil, vacuum constriction devices or penile pros- erectile dysfunction, including ease of use, cost of thesis implantation [32]. and adverse effects profile [35] (C). 3. Other choices may be useful in patients who do not respond to PDE5-Is (B). Summary and recommendations 4. Routine use of hormonal blood tests or hormonal treatment in the management of patients with erectile dysfunctions is not recommended [35] (E). Moderate-to-severe erectile dysfunction is present in 5. Patients at high cardiovascular risk should be 5–20% diabetic men. Erectile dysfunction shares common stabilized by cardiological treatment before the risk factors with CVD. Diagnosis is based on medical sexual activity is considered or erectile dysfunction and sexual history, including validated questionnaires. treatment is recommended (A). Physical examination and laboratory testing must be tailored to the patient’s complaints and risk factors. Treatment is based on PDE5-Is. PDE5-Is have high efficacy Bladder dysfunction and safety rates in patients with diabetes. 1. Initiate therapy with a PDE5-I in men who seek Diabetes mellitus is associated with an earlier onset and treatment for erectile dysfunction, provided there is increased severity of urologic diseases, specifically bladder no contraindication for PDE5-I use [35] (A). disorders. Paralysis of the detrusor muscle, impairment 2. The choice of one specific PDE5-I should be of bladder sensation, alteration of urothelial receptors based on the individual preferences of men with and urothelial signalling mechanisms are the main causes

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr 672 P. Kempler et al. of urologic dysfunctions [36]. Diabetic cystopathy has a dysfunction and urothelial dysfunction. Responsiveness significant impact on QoL. of diabetic bladder strips to externally applied muscarinic agonists has been reported as increased, decreased or described as little or no change in responsiveness. Epidemiology The bladder urothelium is not a passive barrier only, playing an important role as a sensor, controlling bladder Longstanding diabetes causes paralysis of the detrusor function. The effects of diabetes on urothelial receptors muscle leading to voiding difficulties, principally weak and urothelial signalling mechanisms have not been stream, PVR and impairment of bladder sensation. extensively studied, but it has been well established Estimates on the prevalence of bladder dysfunction that in the streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat model, are 43–87% of type 1 diabetic patients and 25% of there are progressive increases in total bladder tissue type 2 diabetic patients. The correlation between diabetic with hypertrophy of the bladder wall and dilation of the cystopathy and peripheral neuropathy ranged from 75 to bladder. The urothelial release of prostaglandins, which 100% [37]. sensitize sensory nerves and bladder smooth muscle, Diabetes duration, peripheral neuropathy and retinopa- may be increased in diabetes and contribute to some thy are significantly associated with severe incontinence. of the bladder abnormalities (e.g. detrusor overactivity) In women, urinary incontinence is estimated to affect observed in diabetic bladder [42]. nearly 50% of middle aged and older women, leading to significant distress, limitations in daily functioning and poorer QoL. Diabetes has been identified as an impor- Clinical evaluation tant independent risk factor for incontinence in women in several large observational studies, including the Nurses’ Common symptoms include dysuria, frequency, urgency, Health Study, and is associated with 30–100% increased nocturia and incomplete bladder emptying. Other symp- risk. Women with diabetes are more likely to experience toms include infrequent voiding, poor stream, hesitancy severe and symptomatic urinary incontinence. Type of in initiating micturition, recurrent cystitis, stress and incontinence is generally urge incontinence, an involun- urgency urinary incontinence. tary loss of urine with a feeling of urgency. Diabetic Urge incontinence, defined as involuntary loss of urine women treated with insulin are at considerably higher with feeling of urgency, is very frequent in women risk of urge incontinence than those treated with oral with DM, while there was no increased risk of stress medications or diet [38]. incontinence, defined as involuntary loss of urine with In men, LUTS are common and often attributed to BPH. physical activity. Among men with BPH, diabetes is associated with more Evaluation of the diabetic patients should include LUTS symptoms compared with non-diabetic men [39]. specific questions about urinary symptoms, ideally using The effect of diabetes on the development or presence a validated questionnaire for incontinence and LUTS. of LUTS has been studied more in patients with type 1 QoL evaluation by means of specific questionnaires is diabetes and is less clear in type 2 diabetes. also very important. Assessment of perineal sensation, In the Diabetes Control and Complication Trial/ sphincter tone and the bulbo-cavernosus reflex may Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Compli- identify peripheral neuropathy consistent with diabetes. cations Study cohort, moderate-to-severe LUTS was Complete urogynaecologic examination is needed to reported in nearly 20% of men at year 10 of Epi- exclude pelvic organ prolapse or other pelvic disorders. demiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study follow-up, after a mean diabetes duration of 22.1 years [40]. In the same cohort, among 550 women Diagnosis with type 1 diabetes who completed a self-administered questionnaire on incontinence, 38% reported any incon- Since diabetic patients are at increased risk of bacterial tinence and 17% reported weekly or greater incontinence cystitis, microscopic urinalysis and culture are essential in [41]. Advancing age, increased weight and previous uri- assessing patients complaining of LUTS. The urothelium nary tract infection were associated with higher risk of in diabetes is susceptible to infections particularly by incontinence. Escherichia coli. Alterations in PMN function in high- Straining, intermittency, postvoid dribbling and weak glucose state may contribute to an increased risk of stream may be secondary to urethral obstruction from urinary tract infection. BPH. However, among men with diabetes, similar The diagnosis of diabetic neurogenic bladder and symptoms may also result from bladder dysfunction due the exact type of dysfunction is made most readily to denervation and poor detrusor contractility with complete urodynamic testing. This may include cystometry, uroflow, simultaneous pressure/flow stud- Pathophysiology ies, sphincter electromyography and urethral pressure profilometry or evaluation of leak-point pressures. In addi- Bladder complications in diabetes can be due to an tion, electrophysiologic testing or other assessments may alteration in the detrusor smooth muscle, neuronal be useful for the assessment of peripheral neuropathy.

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr Gastrointestinal AN, Erectile, Bladder, and Sudomotor Dysfunction in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus 673

Detailed assessment of bladder function with uro- 3. Patients with diabetic cystopathy have impaired dynamic studies is indicated if initial management is detrusor contractions and increased PVR (Class II). unsuccessful or there is doubt about the diagnosis [38]. 4. Overactive bladder is not uncommon in diabetes, Measurement of peak urinary flow rate and PVR should presumably reflecting both central and peripheral be considered in diabetic patients with LUTS. PVR should mechanisms (Class III). ideally be measured using portable ultrasound, as inva- • PVR and urine dipstick (optional culture) should sive catheterization carries a potential risk of infection be performed yearly in all patients with insulin- [43]. Women with type 2 diabetes have lower maximal dependent diabetes (C) [46]. flow rates compared to controls, being most severe in the • Treatment of choice for acontractile bladder presence of peripheral neuropathy [44]. remains intermittent catheterization (B/C) [46]. Urodynamic findings include impaired bladder sensa- tion, increased cystometric capacity, decreased detrusor contractility and increased PVR. Diabetic patients who also had gastroparesis had Sudomotor dysfunction delayed first sensation, increased capacity and increased PVR. Cystometric examination may show detrusor Epidemiology areflexia, but detrusor instability is also frequently found. Detrusor overactivity is the most common Sudomotor function has not yet been assessed in urodynamic observation (48%) followed by impaired epidemiological and longitudinal studies or in RCT’s detrusor contractility (30%), while 15% had poor compliance [45]. The exact mechanism of the detrusor Pathogenesis overactivity in patients with diabetic cystopathy is unclear. Changes in bladder functions were observed as early as Sweat glands are innervated by sudomotor, postgan- within 1 year from the diagnosis of diabetes. glionic, thin, unmyelinated cholinergic sympathetic C- In diabetic children, urinary flow disturbance was fibres. C-fibres also contribute to MBF regulation. C-fibre considered as an early sign of autonomic neuropathy dysfunction can occur early in the course of DPN. [46]. Children with diabetes had a significantly increased voiding volume, increased average urinary flow and increased delay until the first sensation of the need to Clinical manifestations void, compared with healthy children. These abnormal urodynamic features are consistent with sensory nerve Sudomotor dysfunction is associated with dry skin and dysfunction. Time to maximum flow is longer in diabetic itching and may impair QoL and is associated foot subjects as compared with controls and the acceleration ulceration in diabetes [49]. In addition, changes in (the ratio of maximum flow and the time to maximum cutaneous MBF can be associated with adverse changes flow) of diabetic patients is significantly lower. This in skin quality and structure, foot ulceration and oedema. decreased acceleration of detrusor muscle contraction may be interpreted as an early sign of autonomic neuropathy in diabetic children. Diagnosis Perineal electrophysiological testing is altered in dia- betic patients. Electromyography demonstrates peripheral Several methods have been developed to assess sudo- neuropathy in perineal muscles (urethral striated sphinc- motor function with variable degree of complexity and ter, bulbo-cavernosus muscles). Bulbo-cavernosus reflexes accuracy including TST, QSART, SSR, QDIRT, silicone are altered with an increase in sacral latencies. SSEP of impressions and the indicator plaster [50]. tibial and pudendal nerves and motor-evoked potentials TST evaluates the integrity of central and peripheral sympathetic sudomotor pathways [51]. The core body after transcranial magnetic stimulation are delayed in ◦ diabetes [47]. Abnormally prolonged tibial SSEP are sta- temperature is raised to 38 C in a chamber controlled tistically correlated with lower urinary tract dysfunction. for humidity and a maximal sweat response recruited On the contrary, abnormality of pudendal SSEP is not which is detected by a change in the indicator dye correlated to cystopathy. colour. Data are expressed as TST% (anterior body × Bladder dysfunction has not been assessed up to now anhidrosis area/anatomic figure area, 100). TST cannot in epidemiological and longitudinal studies or in RCTs. differentiate pre- from postganglionic lesions, is time consuming, requires special equipment, facilities and preparation [49,51]. Sensitivity is 91–96% in patients Summary and recommendations with distal SFN (Class III) (C) [52]. Data specific to diabetes are lacking. 1. Diabetic cystopathy occurs in up to 80% of type 1 The indicator plaster represents a rapid, simple diabetic patients [48] (Class III). method based on the colour change of a cobalt II 2. Urinary incontinence is strongly associated with compound from blue to pink, after 10 min exposure type 1, but not with type 2 diabetes (Class II). to dermal foot perspiration at the plantar foot regions

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr 674 P. Kempler et al.

Table 2. Sensitivity and specificity of the indicator plaster against silicone impressions and QSART [57]. QDIRT in detecting peripheral neuropathy and autonomic measures the postganglionic sudomotor function [51] neuropathy utilizing an indicator dye (alizarin red mixture) and sweat droplets are quantified [51]. QDIRT is very sensitive Indicator plaster Authors Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) to temperature, humidity, hydration status and intake [51]. QDIRT results highly correlate with silicone Peripheral neuropathy images [58]. Liatis et al. (A) 86 67 Spallone et al. (B) 85 31 Papanas et al. (C) 94 70 Microvascular function assessment Papanas et al. (D) 95 68 The skin offers an accessible organ to assess MBF and Quattrini et al. (E) 85 45 endothelial function, which correlate with systemic mea- Autonomic neuropathy surements of endothelial function and myocardial micro- Liatis et al. (A) 59 46 circulation [57]. Several methods are available to assess Spallone et al. (B) 82 27 skin MBF [59]. Laser Doppler allows the determina- Reference are shown as online addendum (Supporting informa- tion of blood flow under baseal conditions or following tion). physical (e.g. heating) or pharmacological (e.g. acetyl- and/or sodium nitroprusside) stimulation, allow- [53]. Indicator plaster response correlated [54] with ing the differentiation between endothelial-dependent neuropathy disability score (p < 0.001), neuropathic and -independent responses [57]. Furthermore, laser symptom score (p = 0.03), cold detection threshold (p = Doppler allows the measurement of nerve axon reflex- 0.003), heat-as-pain perception threshold (p < 0.043) related vasodilation following acetylcholine iontophoresis and deep-breathing HRV (p < 0.00). Intra-epidermal which is the result of C-fibre stimulation. Laser Doppler nerve fibre density compared with age- and sex-matched techniques include LDF, LDPI and LSCI [57]. control subjects was significantly reduced in patients Single-point LDF measures flow within a small volume 3 with patchy/absent response (p = 0.02). The authors of the dermis (1 mm ), while LDPI scans across a larger concluded that the indicator plaster may serve as a simple area of skin [57]. In LSCI, speckles are formed by the indicator for screening patients with diabetic neuropathy backscatter of laser light and moving particles cause (C). Indicator plaster results correlate well with the fluctuations in the speckle pattern which is related to presence of peripheral sensorimotor neuropathy and to the speed of the illuminated particles (such as blood lesser degree with indications of CAN (Table 2, references cells). LDF and LPDI have been utilized in DPN [60], but are shown in Supporting information). Although indicator data with LSCI are very limited. plaster specificity was lower in most studies, it was LDF has a moderate sensitivity and specificity (75 and comparable with other established methods (Class II and 69%, respectively) when compared with SSR in patients III); nonetheless, reference methods were different in the with diabetic (peripheral) neuropathy (Class III) [61]. various studies. LDPI has a better performance (sensitivity 92% and QSART evaluates postganglionic sudomotor function specificity 93%) compared to nerve conduction studies [52]. Acetylcholine is iontophoresed and sweat produc- in diabetic (peripheral) neuropathy (Class III) [62]. tion measured as an increase in humidity through a In assessing autonomic neuropathy, LDF measurements hygrometer [51]. Results are analysed using area under showed moderate correlations with CAN parameters. the curve, maximal sweat production and sweat onset Each of the above-mentioned laser Doppler techniques latency. QSART is unable to detect preganglionic lesions, has its advantages/disadvantages. LDF has unacceptably high variation with the mean day-to-day coefficient of requires specialized equipment and is expensive [51]. variation in excess of 30% compared to 6.4–12.1% with Sensitivity is 54–90% in patients with SFN (Class III) [52]. LDPI and 8% with LSCI [60]. The theoretical model link- Combining QSART with TST improves the sensitivity to ing the outcome measurement to perfusion is well estab- 98% and helps to localize the lesion [52]. In patients with lished and accepted with regard to LDPI but not for LSCI. painful diabetic neuropathy, QSART has poor sensitivity (58%) and correlates with pain severity (Class III) [55]. SSR, surrogate measure of sudomotor function, Recommendations measures electrodermal activity [51]. Responses may be absent in >50-year individuals and there is no clear 1. All methods mentioned above are appropriate for definition of abnormal response [51]. A sensitivity of sudomotor function testing in diabetic patients, 87.5%, a specificity of 88.2% and a negative predictive although some need further validation (Level C). value of 93.7% to diagnose/exclude diabetic autonomic 2. The indicator plaster may serve a simple method neuropathy (Class III) is reported [56]. SSR sensitivity for screening of diabetic (peripheral) neuropathy in detecting diabetic (peripheral) neuropathy is 31–76% (Level C). (Class III). 3. SSR and QSART performance is better when Silicone impressions use acetylcholine iontophoresis detecting autonomic neuropathy compared to to stimulate sweating [51]. QDIRT has been validated diabetic (peripheral) neuropathy (Level C).

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr Gastrointestinal AN, Erectile, Bladder, and Sudomotor Dysfunction in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus 675

4. LDPI is a reproducible, sensitive and specific Jannik Hilsted, MD, Copenhagen University Hospital, tool to diagnose diabetic (peripheral) neuropathy Copenhagen, Denmark (Level C). Michael Horowitz, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, 5. There is a need to standardize methods when using University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia laser Doppler in clinical studies (Level C). Peter Kempler, MD, PhD, I Department of Medicine, 6. Studies validating the use and reproducibility of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary LSCI in diabetic (peripheral) neuropathy are needed Giuseppe Lauria, MD, Neuromuscular Diseases Unit, (Level C). 7. Prospective studies are needed to assess the ‘‘Carlo Besta’’ Neurological Institute, Milan, Italy prognostic value of these tests (Level C). Philip Low, MD, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA Rayaz Malik, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Supporting information University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Peter C. O’Brien, PhD, Mayo Clinic, College of Medicine, Supporting information may be found in the online Rochester, MN, USA version of this article. Rodica Pop-Busui, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Conflict of interest Bruce Perkins, MD, MPH, Division of Endocrinology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada The authors have no conflicts of interest. Gerry Rayman, MD, Diabetes Centre, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, UK James Russell, MD, Department of Neurology and Appendix Neurophysiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA The Toronto Consensus Panel on Diabetic Neuropathy Søren Sindrup, MD, Department of Neurology. Odense James W Albers, MD, PhD, University of Michigan, Ann University Hospital, Odense, Denmark Arbor, MI, USA Gordon Smith, MD, Department of Neurology, University G´erard Amarenco, MD, Service de R´e´education Neu- of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA rologique et d’Explorations P´erin´eales, Hopitalˆ Roth- Vincenza Spallone, MD, PhD, Department of Internal schild, AP-HP, Paris, France Henning Anderson, MD, Department of Neurology, Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark Martin Stevens, MD, Department of Medicine, University Joe Arezzo, PhD, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK New York, NY, USA Solomon Tesfaye, MD, Diabetes Research Unit, Sheffield Misha-Miroslav Backonja, MD, Department of Neurology, Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK University of Madison-Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA Paul Valensi, MD, Service d’Endocrinologie- Luciano Bernardi, MD, Clinica Medica 1, Universita’ di Diab´etologie-Nutrition, Hopitalˆ Jean Verdier, Bondy, Pavia, Pavia, Italy France Geert-Jan Biessels, MD, Department of Neurology, Rudolf Tamas´ Varkonyi,´ MD, PhD, First Department of Medicine, Magnus Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary Andrew J. M. Boulton, MD, Department of Medicine, Aristides Veves, MD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Vera Bril, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Center,HarvardMedicalSchool,Boston,MA,USA Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada Loretta Vileikyte, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, Norman Cameron, PhD, University of Aberdeen, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Aberdeen, UK Aaron Vinik, MD, PhD, Strelitz Diabetes Research Mary Cotter, PhD, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK Institutes, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, PeterJ.Dyck,MD,DepartmentofNeurology,MayoClinic, VA, USA Rochester, MN, USA Dan Ziegler, MD, Institute for Clinical Diabetology, John England, MD, Department of Neurology at Louisiana German Diabetes Center at the Heinrich Heine University, State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Leibniz Center for Diabetes Research, Leibniz, Germany; LA, USA Department of Metabolic Diseases, University Hospital, Eva Feldman, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Dusseldorf,¨ Germany Roy Freeman, MD, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Doug Zochodne, MD, Department of Clinical Neuro- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA science, University of Calgary, AB, Canada Simona Frontoni, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, NIDDK observer – Teresa Jones, MD, NIDDK, Bethesda, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy MD, USA

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr 676 P. Kempler et al.

References

1. Horowitz M, Maddox AF, Wishart JM, and Motility Society consensus state- Incidence of erectile dysfunction in men Harding PE, Chatterton BE, Shearman ment on intraluminal measurement of 40 to 69 years old: longitudinal results DJ. Relationships between oesophageal gastrointestinal and colonic motility from the Massachusetts male aging transit and solid and liquid gastric emp- in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterol study. JUrol2000; 163: 460–463. tying in diabetes mellitus. Eur J Nucl Motil 2008; 20: 1269–1282. 25. Fedele D, Coscelli C, Santeusanio F, Med 1991; 18(4): 229–234. 14. Jones KL, Berry M, Kong MF, Kwiatek et al. Erectile dysfunction in diabetic 2. Parkman HP, Hasler WL, Fisher RS. MA,SamsomM,HorowitzM.Hyper- subjects in Italy. Diabetes Care 1998; American Gastroenterological Associa- glycaemia attenuates the gastrokinetic 21: 1973–1977. tion technical review on the diag- effect of erythromycin and affects the 26. Inman BA, Sauver JL, Jacobson DJ, nosis and treatment of gastropare- perception of postprandial hunger in et al. A population-based, longitudinal sis. Gastroenterology 2004; 127(5): normal subjects. Diabetes Care 1999; study of erectile dysfunction and future 1592–1622. 22: 339–344. coronary artery disease. Mayo Clin Proc 3. Bharucha AE, Camelleri M, Forstrom 15. Sturm A, Holtmann G, Goebell H, 2009; 84: 108–113. LA, Zinsmeister A. Relationship between Gerken C. Prokentics in patients with 27. Araujo AB, Travison TG, Ganz P, et al. clinical features and gastric emptying gastroparesis: a systematic analysis. Erectile dysfunction and mortality. JSex disturbance in diabetes mellitus. Clin Digestion 1999; 60: 422–427. Med 2009; 6: 2445–2454. Endocrinol 2009; 70: 415–420. 16. McCallum RW, Snape W, Brady F, 28. Penson DF, Latini DM, Lubeck DP, 4. Bytzer P, Talley NJ, Leemon M, Young Wa J, Parkman HP, Nowak T. Gastric Wallace KL, Henning JM, Lue TF. LJ, Jones MP, Horowitz M. Prevalence electrical stimulation with Enterra ther- Do impotent men with diabetes have of gastrointestinal symptoms associated apyimprovessymptomsfromdiabetic more severe erectile dysfunction and with diabetes mellitus: a population- gastroparesis in a prospective study. worse quality of life than the gen- based survey of 15 000 adults. Arch Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: eral population of impotent patients? Intern Med 2001; 161: 1989–1996. 947–954. Results from the Exploratory Compre- 5. Rayner CK, Samsom M, Jones KL, 17. Samson M, Verhagen M. Intestinal func- hensive Evaluation of Erectile Dysfunc- Horowitz M. Relationships of upper gas- tion. In Gastrointestinal Function in Dia- tion (ExCEED) database. Diabetes Care trointestinal motor and sensory function betes Mellitus, Horowitz M, Samsom M 2003; 26: 1093–1099. with glycemic control. Diabetes Care (eds). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons: 29. De Berardis G, Pellegrini F, Franciosi M, 2004; 177–217. 2001; 24(2): 371–381. et al. QuED (Quality of Care and Out- 18. Ma J, Stevens JE, Cukier K, et al.Effects 6. Horowitz M, Edelbroek MA, Wishart JM, comes in Type 2 Diabetes) Study Group of a protein preload on gastric empty- Straathof JW. Relationship between oral Longitudinal assessment of quality of ing, glycaemia and gut hormones after glucose tolerance and gastric emptying life in patients with type 2 diabetes and a carbohydrate meal in diet controlled in normal healthy subjects. Diabetologia self-reported erectile dysfunction. Dia- type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 1993; 36: 857–862. betes Care 2005; 28: 2637–2643. 1600–1602. 7. Horowitz M, Jones KL, Rayner CK, 30. Varkonyi´ T, Kempler P. Erectile dysfunc- 19.LinnebjergH,ParkS,KotharePA,et al. Read NW. ’Gastric’ hypoglycaemia: an tion. In Diabetes in Old Age (3rd edn), Effect of exenatide on gastric empty- important concept in diabetes manage- Sinclair A (ed). John Wiley & Sons: ing and relationship to postprandial ment. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2006; 2009; 149–164. glycemia in type 2 diabetes. Regul Pept 18: 405–407. 31. Kostis JB, Jackson G, Rosen R, et al.Sex- 2008; 151: 123–129. 8. Phillips LK, Rayner CK, Jones KL, ual dysfunction and cardiac risk (the 20. Sun P, Cameron A, Seftel A, Shabsigh Horowitz M. An update on autonomic R, Niederberger C, Guay A. Erectile Second Princeton Consensus Confer- neuropathy affecting the gastrointesti- dysfunction – an observable marker of ence). Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 313–321. nal tract. Curr Diab Rep 2006; 6: diabetes mellitus? A large national epi- 32. Hatzimouratidis K, Amar E, Eardley I, 417–423. demiological study. JUrol2006; 176: et al. Guidelines on male sexual dys- 9. Pasricha PJ, Pehlivanov ND, Gomez 1081–1085. function: erectile dysfunction and pre- G, Vittal H, Lurken MS, Farrugia G. 21. Nicolosi A, Glasser DB, Brock G, Lau- mature ejaculation. Eur Urol 2010; 57: Changes in the gastric enteric nervous mann E, Gingell C. Diabetes and sexual 804–814. system and muscle: a case report on function in older adults: results of an 33. Ziegler D, Merfort F, van Ahlen H, Yassin two patients with diabetic gastroparesis. international survey. Br J Diabetes Vasc A, Reblin T, Neureither M. Efficacy and BMC Gastroenterol 2008; 8: 21. Dis 2002; 2: 336–339. safety of flexible-dose vardenafil in men 10. Khoo J, Rayner CK, Jones KL, Horowitz 22. Tesfaye S, Stevens LK, Stephenson JM, with type 1 diabetes and erectile dys- M. Pathophysiology and management et al. Prevalence of diabetic peripheral function. JSexMed2006; 3: 883–891. of gastroparesis. Exp Rev Gastroenterol neuropathy and its relation to glycaemic 34. Hatzichristou D, Gambla M, Rubio- Hepatol 2009; 3: 167–181. control and potential risk factors: the Aurioles E, et al. Efficacy of tadalafil 11. Schvarcz E, Palmer M, Aman J, EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study. once daily in men with diabetes melli- Horowitz M, Stridsberg M, Berne C. Diabetologia 1996; 39: 1377–1384. tus and erectile dysfunction. Diabet Med Physiological hyperglycemia slows gas- 23. Penson DF, Wessells H, Cleary P, Rut- 2008; 25: 138–146. tric emptying in normal subjects and ledge BN, Diabetes Control and Com- 35. Qaseem A, Snow V, Denberg TD, et al. patients with insulin-dependent dia- plications Trial/Epidemiology of Dia- Hormonal testing and pharmacologic betes mellitus. Gastroenterology 1997; betes Interventions and Complications treatment of erectile dysfunction: a clin- 113: 60–66. Research Group. Sexual dysfunction ical practice guideline from the Ameri- 12. Jones KL, Russo A, Stevens JE, Wishart and symptom impact in men with can College of Physicians. Clinical Effi- JM, Berry MK, Horowitz M. Predictors long-standing type 1 diabetes in the cacy Assessment Subcommittee of the of delayed gastric emptying in diabetes. DCCT/EDIC cohort. JSexMed2009; American College of Physicians. Ann Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1264–1269. 6: 1969–1978. Intern Med 2009; 151: 639–649. 13. Camilleri M, Bharucha AE, Lorenzo 24. Johannes CB, Araujo AB, Feldman HA, 36. Hill SR, Fayyad AM, Jones GR. Diabetes C, et al.Amerian Neurogastroenterology Derby CA, Kleinman KP, McKinlay JB. mellitus and female lower urinary tract

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr Gastrointestinal AN, Erectile, Bladder, and Sudomotor Dysfunction in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus 677

symptoms: a review. Neurourol Urodyn voiding behavior. JUrol2004; 172: 53. Schnell O, Muller¨ M, Standl E. Early 2008; 27: 362–367. 989–992. detection of changes in the feet of dia- 37. Esteghamati A, Rashidi A, Nikfal- 45. Kaplan SA, Te AE, Blaivas JG. Urody- betic patients with indicator test Neu- lah A, Yousefizadeh A. The associa- namic findings in patients with diabetic ropad. Diabetes Metab Heart 2008; 17: tion between urodynamic findings and cystopathy. JUrol1995; 153: 342–344. 203–210. microvascular complications in patients 46. Szabo L, Barkai L, Lombay B. Urinary 54. Quattrini C, Jeziorska M, Tavakoli M, with long-term type 2 diabetes but with- flow disturbance as an early sign of Begum P, Boulton AJM, Malik RA. The out voiding symptoms. Diabetes Res Clin autonomic neuropathy in diabetic chil- Neuropad test: a visual indicator test for Pract 2007; 78(1): 42–50. [E-pub 19 dren and adolescents. Neurourol Urodyn human diabetic neuropathy. Diabetolo- March 2007] 2007; 26: 218–221. gia 2008; 51: 1046–1050. 55. Low PA, Vernino S, Suarez G. Auto- 38. Jackson RA, Vittinghoff E, Kanaya AM, 47. Rapidi CA, Karandreas N, Katsifotis C, nomic dysfunction in peripheral nerve et al. Urinary incontinence in elderly Benroubi M, Petropoulou K, Theodorou disease. Muscle Nerve 2003; 27: women: finding from the Health, Aging, C. A combined urodynamic and electro- 646–661. and Body Composition Study. Obstet physiological study of diabetic cystopa- Gynecol 2004; 104: 301–307. 56. Al-Moallem MA, Zaidan RM, Alkali NH. thy. Neurourol Urodyn 2006; 25: 32–38. The sympathetic skin response in dia- 39. Michel MC, Mehlburger L, Schumacher 48. Wyndaele JJ, Kovindha A, Maders- H, Bressel HU, Goepel M. Effect of dia- betic neuropathy and its relationship bacher H, Raddziszewski P, Ruffion to autonomic symptoms. Saudi Med J betes on lower urinary tract symptoms A, Schurch B. Neurologic urinary and in patients with benign prostatic hyper- 2008; 29: 568–572. faecal incontinence. Diabetes Mellitus plasia. JUrol2000; 163: 1725–1729. 57. Turner J, Belch JJF, Khan F. Current (916–917). In Incontinence (4th Inter- concepts in assessment of microvascular 40. Van Den Eeden SK, Sarma AV, Rutledge national Consultation on Incontinence) endothelial function using laser doppler BN, et al. Effect of intensive glycemic (4th edn), vol 1, Editions 21. Health imaging and iontophoresis. Trends Car- control and diabetes complications on Publication: Paris, 2009; 1870 p. ISBN diovasc Med 2008; 18: 109–116. lower urinary tract symptoms in men 0-9546956-8-2. 58. Gibbons CH, Illigens BMW, Centi J, with type 1 diabetes: Diabetes Control 49. Tentolouris N, Marinou K, Kokotis P, Freeman R. QDIRT: Quantitative direct and Complications Trial/Epidemiology Karanti A, Diakoumopoulou E, Katsil- and indirect test of sudomotor function. of Diabetes Interventions and Complica- ambros N. Sudomotor dysfunction is Neurology 2008; 70: 2299–2304. tions (DCCT/EDIC) study. Diabetes Care associated with foot ulceration in dia- 59. Chao CY, Cheing CL. Microvascular dys- 2009; 32: 664–670. betes. Diabet Med 2009; 26: 302–305. function in diabetic foot disease and 41. Sarma AV, Kanaya A, Nyberg LM, ulceration. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2009; et al. Risk factors for urinary inconti- 50. England JD, Gronseth GS, Franklin G, et al. Practice parameter: evaluation of 25: 604–614. nence among women with type 1 dia- 60. Quattrini C, Harris ND, Malik RA, Tes- betes: findings from the epidemiology distal symmetric polyneuropathy: role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and faye S. Impaired skin microvascular of diabetes interventions and compli- reactivity in painful diabetic neuropa- skin biopsy (an evidence-based review). cations study. Urology 2009; 73(6): thy. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 655–659. Report of the American Academy of 1203–1209. 61. Hilz MJ, Hecht MJ, Berghoff M, Singer Neurology, American Association of 42. Yoshimura N, Chancellor MB, Ander- W, Neundoerfer B. Abnormal vasore- Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic sson KE, Christ GJ. Recent advances action to arousal stimuli – an early in understanding the biology of DM- Medicine, and American Academy of sign of diabetic sympathetic neuropathy associated bladder complications and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. demonstrated by laser Doppler flowme- novel therapy. BJU Int 2005; 95: Neurology 2009; 72: 177–184. try. JClinNeurophysiol2000; 17: 733–738. 51. Illigens B, Gibbons C. Sweat testing to 419–425. 43. Hunter KF, Moore KN. DM-associated evaluate autonomic function. Clin Auton 62.KimSW,KimSC,NamKC,KangES, bladder dysfunction in the older adult Res 2009; 19: 79–87. Im JJ, Kim DW. A new method of (CE). Geriatr Nurs (New York, NY) 2003; 52. Low VA, Sandroni P, Fealey RD, Low PA. screening for diabetic neuropathy using 24: 138–145. Detection of small-fiber neuropathy by laser Doppler and photoplethysmogra- 44. Lee WC, Wu HP, Tai TY, Liu SP, Chen J, sudomotor testing. Muscle Nerve 2006; phy. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008; 46: Yu HJ. Effects of diabetes on female 34: 57–61. 61–67.

Copyright  2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011; 27: 665–677. DOI: 10.1002/dmrr