DOCSLIB.ORG

National Register of Historic Places Registration Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: _Lincoln Heights Historic District__________________________________ Other names/site number: ______________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: _ Historic Residential Suburbs in the United States, 1830-1960_______________________ (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: _ Bounded by Lewis & Clark Parkway to the north, Hibiscus Dr. to the east, the south side of Lynnwood Dr. to the south, and Lincoln Drive to the west_________________________ City or town: _Clarksville___________ State: _Indiana___________ County: _Clark______ Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _X__ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: ___national ___statewide _X__local Applicable National Register Criteria: _X__A _X__B _X__C ___D Signature of certifying official/Title: Date Indiana DNR-Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting official: Date Title : State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government 1 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Lincoln Heights Historic District Clark County, Indiana Name of Property County and State ______________________________________________________________________________ 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that this property is: entered in the National Register determined eligible for the National Register determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain:) _____________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Signature of the Keeper Date of Action ____________________________________________________________________________ 5. Classification Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply.) Private: X Public – Local Public – State Public – Federal Category of Property (Check only one box.) Building(s) District X Site Structure Object Sections 1-6 page 2 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Lincoln Heights Historic District Clark County, Indiana Name of Property County and State Number of Resources within Property (Do not include previously listed resources in the count) Contributing Noncontributing __115___________ ____36_________ buildings ___0__________ ____0_________ sites ___1__________ ____0_________ structures ___0__________ ____0_________ objects ___116__________ ____36_________ Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register __0_______ ____________________________________________________________________________ 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) DOMESTIC: single dwelling __________________ DOMESTIC: secondary structure _________________ DOMESTIC: multiple dwelling ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions.) DOMESTIC: single dwelling __________________ DOMESTIC: secondary structure _________________ DOMESTIC: multiple dwelling ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ Sections 1-6 page 3 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Lincoln Heights Historic District Clark County, Indiana Name of Property County and State _____________________________________________________________________________ 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions.) LATE 19TH & 20TH CENTURY REVIVALS/Colonial Revival ___________________ LATE 19TH & 20TH CENTURY REVIVALS/Tudor Revival ___________________ LATE 19TH & EARLY 20TH CENTURY AMERICAN MOVEMENTS/Bungalow/Craftsman MODERN MOVEMENT/Ranch ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ Materials: (enter categories from instructions.) foundation: CONCRETE ________________________ walls: BRICK________________________ STONE/Limestone___________________ STONE/Sandstone____________________ SYNTHETICS/Vinyl__________________ WOOD/Weatherboard___________ CONCRETE ________________________ roof: ASPHALT________________________ TERRA COTTA STONE/Slate other: GLASS________________________ STUCCO ________________________ Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current physical appearance and condition of the property. Describe contributing and noncontributing resources if applicable. Begin with a summary paragraph that briefly describes the general characteristics of the property, such as its location, type, style, method of construction, setting, size, and significant features. Indicate whether the property has historic integrity.) ______________________________________________________________________________ Summary Paragraph The Lincoln Heights Historic District is near the western boundary of the Town of Clarksville in Clark County, Indiana. It is approximately four miles west of the county seat of Jeffersonville, one mile from the eastern edge of New Albany in Floyd County, Indiana, and approximately four miles north of Louisville, Kentucky. Situated immediately south of the Lewis and Clark Section 7 page 4 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 Lincoln Heights Historic District Clark County, Indiana Name of Property County and State Parkway, the district encompasses roughly three blocks roughly bounded by Lincoln Drive on the west, a small section of McCulloch Pike and properties fronting Lewis and Clark Parkway on the north, the immediately adjacent Beechwood Manor Subdivision on the east, and a Vectren Energy complex on the south. Platted in 1928 as an interurban subdivision, construction in the district occurred in stages during the 1930s and early 1940s due to the Great Depression and World War Two. The remainder of most construction occurred between 1945 and 1960. Designed to attract the middle and upper middle class, the homes reflect high style examples of the Tudor and Colonial Revival styles, and good examples of Bungalow, American Small House and Ranch types. Notable examples of some of the earliest homes in the district include two bungalows, the Gibson House at 2710 Hollywood Boulevard (1929) and the King House at 2704 Hollywood Boulevard (1929), and three Tudor Revival styles homes, the Peck House at 214 Lynnwood Drive (1932), the Hobart-Galligan House at 207 Maplewood Drive (c.1935), and the Hurst House at 200 Maplewood Drive (c.1939). Later notable examples of the American Small House and Ranch types include the Davis House at 215 Rosewood Drive (c.1948), the Rosemary Prentice House at 212 Lynnwood Drive (1946), the Kreckel House at 2701 Wildwood Drive (1956), and the house at 214 Rosewood Drive (c.1956). The district was annexed by the town of Clarksville in 1989. _____________________________________________________________________________ Narrative Description Lincoln Heights Historic District is immediately south of the Lewis and Clark Parkway, a four-lane highway connecting the towns of Clarksville and New Albany.1 The district is bounded by Lincoln Drive on the west which provides the only access to the district by way of Rosewood, Maplewood and Lynnwood Drives. The district was platted on the former farm of John McCullough, known as Montrose (Indiana Register of Historic Sites and Structures, 1995). The 1870 farmhouse is immediately north of the properties along Rosewood Drive. Beechwood Manor, a later 20th century subdivision, is immediately to the east and immediately to the south is a former stone quarry, now the site of a Vectren Energy complex. Heavy commercial development is to the east along Lewis and Clark Parkway, industrial development is not far to the west of the district, and commercial and residential areas are both north of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • President Biden Appeals for Unity He Faces a Confluence of Crises Stemming from Pandemic, Insurrection & Race by BRIAN A
    V26, N21 Thursday, Jan.21, 2021 President Biden appeals for unity He faces a confluence of crises stemming from pandemic, insurrection & race By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – In what remains a crime scene from the insurrection on Jan. 6, President Joe Biden took the oath of office at the U.S. Capitol Wednesday, appealing to all Americans for “unity” and the survival of the planet’s oldest democ- racy. “We’ve learned again that democracy is precious,” when he declared in strongman fashion, “I alone can fix Biden said shortly before noon Wednesday after taking the it.” oath of office from Chief Justice John Roberts. “Democ- When Trump fitfully turned the reins over to Biden racy is fragile. And at this hour, my friends, democracy has without ever acknowledging the latter’s victory, it came prevailed.” after the Capitol insurrection on Jan. 6 that Senate Minor- His words of assurance came four years to the day ity Leader Mitch McConnell said he had “provoked,” leading since President Trump delivered his dystopian “American to an unprecedented second impeachment. It came with carnage” address, coming on the heels of his Republican National Convention speech in Cleveland in July 2016 Continued on page 3 Biden’s critical challenge By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – Here is the most critical chal- lenge facing President Biden: Vaccinate as many of the 320 million Americans as soon as possible. While the Trump administration’s Operation Warp “Hoosiers have risen to meet Speed helped develop the CO- VID-19 vaccine in record time, these unprecedented challenges. most of the manufactured doses haven’t been injected into the The state of our state is resilient arms of Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Laurentide Ice-Flow Patterns: a Historical Review, and Implications of the Dispersal of Belcher Islands Erratics"
    Article "Laurentide Ice-Flow Patterns: A Historical Review, and Implications of the Dispersal of Belcher Islands Erratics" Victor K. Prest Géographie physique et Quaternaire, vol. 44, n° 2, 1990, p. 113-136. Pour citer cet article, utiliser l'information suivante : URI: http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/032812ar DOI: 10.7202/032812ar Note : les règles d'écriture des références bibliographiques peuvent varier selon les différents domaines du savoir. Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d'auteur. L'utilisation des services d'Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d'utilisation que vous pouvez consulter à l'URI https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Érudit est un consortium interuniversitaire sans but lucratif composé de l'Université de Montréal, l'Université Laval et l'Université du Québec à Montréal. Il a pour mission la promotion et la valorisation de la recherche. Érudit offre des services d'édition numérique de documents scientifiques depuis 1998. Pour communiquer avec les responsables d'Érudit : [email protected] Document téléchargé le 12 février 2017 05:36 Géographie physique et Quaternaire, 1990, vol. 44, n°2, p. 113-136, 29 fig., 1 tabl LAURENTIDE ICE-FLOW PATTERNS A HISTORIAL REVIEW, AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE DISPERSAL OF BELCHER ISLAND ERRATICS Victor K. PREST, Geological Survey of Canada, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8. ABSTRACT This paper deals with the evo­ Archean upland. Similar erratics are common en se fondant sur la croissance glaciaire vers lution of ideas concerning the configuration of in northern Manitoba in the zone of confluence l'ouest à partir du Québec-Labrador.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    Relative Location and the Growth of Terre Haute Thomas Frank Barton, Indiana University A population graph of Terre Haute presents a challenging problem because it is the only large city in Indiana whose population declined for two decades and whose total estimated population in 1950 is less than its peak was in 1920. The city's most rapid growth took place be- tween 1900 and 1910 when its population increased from 36,673 to 58,157. In 1920 its population reached a peak of 66,083 and then declined to 62,810 in 1930 and 62,693 in 1940. A preliminary release indicates that Terre Haute's numbers increased to 64,097 in 1950, a gain of only about 1,400. These statistics stimulate one to ask questions. Why did the city grow so rapidly between 1900 and 1910? What factors contributed to the decline between 1920 and 1940? What are the future prospects? etc. Perhaps in the past too many of those who have been both economically and academically interested in Terre Haute's growth have concentrated their attention upon the political city and have failed to give adequate consideration to its relative location and its neighbors. There are many large and small cities near this Queen City of the Wabash. Approximately 170 miles to the north is Chicago and 100 miles to the south is Evansville. Seventy-three miles to the northeast is Indianapolis, capital of Indiana, while 130 miles to the northwest is Springfield, capital of Illinois. It is interesting to note that Terre Haute is almost equidistant from the metropolitan areas of Chicago, St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dual Origin of Minnesota
    Library of Congress The dual origin of Minnesota / THE DUAL ORIGIN OF MINNESOTA.* BY SAMUEL M. DAVIS. * Read at the monthly meeting of the Executive Council, April 10, 1899. It is the purpose of this paper to trace the origin and source of the territory now comprised within the boundary of the state of Minnesota This state occupies the unique position of being the only state in the Union which acquired its territory from the two largest accessions of land to the United States in the early history of this government. I refer to the cession of the Northwest Territory by Great Britain in 1783 and the Louisiana Purchase in 1803. About twenty-nine thousand square miles of territory, including all east of the Mississippi which is now comprised within the boundary of the state, originated in the cession by the treaty with Great Britain in 1783. The remaining part, about fifty-five thousand square miles, was secured from the territory originally purchased from France in 1803. It is my object to sketch the main features connecting these two great treaties of accession of territory, both in relation to the boundary of the territory acquired and also with reference to the government provided for them after the territory was acquired. CESSION OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORY. The Revolutionary War, which began April 19th, 1775, was closed by three separate treaties of peace. The United States and France conducted simultaneous negotiations with different English Commissioners, with the understanding that the preliminaries should be signed the same day. Dr. Franklin wrote to Vergennes on the 29th of November, 1782, that the American articles were already agreed upon and that he hoped to lay a copy of them before his Excellency the following day.
    [Show full text]
  • Glimpses of Early Dickinson County
    GLIMPSES OF EARLY DICKINSON COUNTY by William J. Cummings March, 2004 Evolution of Michigan from Northwest Territory to Statehood From 1787 to 1800 the lands now comprising Michigan were a part of the Northwest Territory. From 1800 to 1803 half of what is now the Lower Peninsula of Michigan and all of the Upper Peninsula were part of Indiana Territory. From 1803 to 1805 what is now Michigan was again part of the Northwest Territory which was smaller due to Ohio achieving statehood on March 1, 1803. From 1805 to 1836 Michigan Territory consisted of the Lower Peninsula and a small portion of the eastern Upper Peninsula. In 1836 the lands comprising the remainder of the Upper Peninsula were given to Michigan in exchange for the Toledo Strip. Michigan Territory Map, 1822 This map of Michigan Territory appeared in A Complete Historical, Chronological and Geographical American Atlas published by H.S. Carey and I. Lea in Philadelphia in 1822. Note the lack of detail in the northern Lower Peninsula and the Upper Peninsula which were largely unexplored and inhabited by Native Americans at this time. Wiskonsan and Iowa, 1838 Michigan and Wiskonsan, 1840 EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT! VULCAN – A number of Indians – men, women and children – came into town Wednesday last from Bad Water [sic] for the purpose of selling berries, furs, etc., having with them a lot of regular Indian ponies. They make a novel picture as they go along one after the other, looking more like Indians we read about than those usually seen in civilization, and are always looked upon in wonderment by strangers, though it has long since lost its novelty to the residents here.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Profile Vol
    NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY | CENTER FOR GOVERNMENTAL STUDIES Policy Profile Vol. 20, No. 1 Dixon, Illinois: A Northern Illinois Community Aggressively Preparing for a Rapidly Changing Economic and Cultural Environment Prepared by Danny Langloss and Norman Walzer1 Dixon, Illinois, is a medium size rural What Issues Face Dixon and Other Small Communities? community in northwestern Illinois. With a population of 15,135, it has been, and hopes to Rural communities are being hurt by: continue to be, an active regional hub serving 1. Competition from foreign businesses where as a residence for people who work locally or labor costs are lower; in surrounding communities. To achieve this 2. Relatively poor access to broadband which, in goal, Dixon has used – with considerable success turn, is essential to an information — a planning/development model that other economy; and communities might wish to employ, not only 3. The widening divergence in wage rates to protect themselves from existing and future between urban and rural areas that lures economic and technology changes but, even more secondary school graduates with skills in importantly, to prosper from such changes. advanced technology to larger cities with better employment opportunities, aggravating the The need to do so is critical for many rural difficulties rural employers have in finding communities – especially those located within qualified workers. commuting distance from larger cities. In recent years, small rural communities with economies The challenges for rural communities are relying heavily on agricultural and manufacturing further complicated by indications that mid-size activities have performed less well than larger and larger communities will continue to outperform urban and metropolitan areas where businesses smaller, manufacturing-based communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on the Dedication of the Restored Fort Washington Monument
    Remarks on the Dedication of the Restored Fort Washington Monument by ARTHUR G. KING, M. D. On Memorial Day, May 30, 1963, in an impressive ceremony at the site, the restored Fort Washington Monument was dedicated. The original monument had stood at Third and Ludlow Streets since 1901, but was dismantled in the 1950's when the Third Street Distributor was constructed. The new monument contains a revised inscription and a corrected map; on the map of the old monument, the location of the Fort was in error. We take pride in the fact that our Society has been vitally instru- mental in the planning and completion of the new monument. Moreover, HPSO Collection Unveiling of the Fort Washington Monument June 14, 1901 Dedication of the Restored Fort Washington Monument 203 the main address for the dedicatory ceremony was presented by Arthur G. King, M.D., the most knowledgeable authority on Fort Washington, who represented the Historical and Philosophical Society of Ohio. We take pleasure in presenting Dr. King's remarks. Memorial Day is a particularly appropriate time for the rededica- tion of this monument to Fort Washington; first, to recall that Cin- cinnati is where it is because of Fort Washington; and second, in • :- • Courtesy Cincinnati Enquirer Dr. Arthur G. King delivering main address at dedication of restored Fort Washington Monument—May 30, 1963 204 The Bulletin memory of the many members of its garrison who died in the Indian Wars defending our city in its infancy. In 1788 John Cleves Symmes envisioned the entire Ohio River front from the Little Miami to the Great Miami occupied by settle- ments, of which the most important would be North Bend, where he later set up his headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoosiers and the American Story Chapter 5
    Reuben Wells Locomotive The Reuben Wells Locomotive is a fifty-six ton engine named after the Jeffersonville, Indiana, mechanic who designed it in 1868. This was no ordinary locomotive. It was designed to carry train cars up the steepest rail incline in the country at that time—in Madison, Indi- ana. Before the invention of the Reuben Wells, trains had to rely on horses or a cog system to pull them uphill. The cog system fitted a wheel to the center of the train for traction on steep inclines. You can now see the Reuben Wells at the Children’s Museum of Indianapolis. You can also take rides on historic trains that depart from French Lick and Connersville, Indiana. 114 | Hoosiers and the American Story 2033-12 Hoosiers American Story.indd 114 8/29/14 10:59 AM 5 The Age of Industry Comes to Indiana [The] new kind of young men in business downtown . had one supreme theory: that the perfect beauty and happiness of cities and of human life was to be brought about by more factories. — Booth Tarkington, The Magnificent Ambersons (1918) Life changed rapidly for Hoosiers in the decades New kinds of manufacturing also powered growth. after the Civil War. Old ways withered in the new age Before the Civil War most families made their own of industry. As factories sprang up, hopes rose that food, clothing, soap, and shoes. Blacksmith shops and economic growth would make a better life than that small factories produced a few special items, such as known by the pioneer generations.
    [Show full text]
  • BIB19 Layout 1
    2019 Budget in Brief Hamilton County, Ohio Board of County Commissioners Denise Driehaus Todd Portune Stephanie Summerow Dumas County Administrator Jeff Aluotto About the Cover The 2019 Budget in Brief cover showcases six Hamilton County entities that celebrated milestone anniversaries during 2018. Anderson Township The Banks 225 Years 10 Years Situated on both the A working Ohio River and the partnership Little Miami Scenic between River, Anderson is the City of noted for its high qual‐ Cincinnati and Hamilton County, The Banks ity of life, exceptional Public Partnership ensures timely, safe, public services, excel‐ efficient, and inclusive management of the lent schools, parks, and public infrastructure of the riverfront proj‐ riverside entertain‐ ect. Reds CEO Bob Castellini (chair of the ment. This tree‐lined community celebrat‐ Joint Banks Steering Committee), marked ed in 2018 with special events, banners, a 10 years since the groundbreaking at The series of videos, and a pictorial book. Banks with children born in April 2008. Cincinnati Cincinnati Observatory Shakespeare 175 Years Company Known as ‘The 25th Season Birthplace of A professional American theatre company Astronomy,’ dedicated to the Observato‐ bringing Shakes‐ ry is a fully functioning 19th century obser‐ peare and the classics to life for audiences vatory and a National Historic Landmark of all ages, CSC relocated in 2017 to the used daily by the public and amateur Otto M. Budig Theater in Over‐the‐Rhine. astronomers, civic organizations, teachers, Each year, its education and outreach students, and history buffs in the study and programs reach over 50,000 young people practice of 21st century astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Along the Ohio Trail
    Along The Ohio Trail A Short History of Ohio Lands Dear Ohioan, Meet Simon, your trail guide through Ohio’s history! As the 17th state in the Union, Ohio has a unique history that I hope you will find interesting and worth exploring. As you read Along the Ohio Trail, you will learn about Ohio’s geography, what the first Ohioan’s were like, how Ohio was discovered, and other fun facts that made Ohio the place you call home. Enjoy the adventure in learning more about our great state! Sincerely, Keith Faber Ohio Auditor of State Along the Ohio Trail Table of Contents page Ohio Geography . .1 Prehistoric Ohio . .8 Native Americans, Explorers, and Traders . .17 Ohio Land Claims 1770-1785 . .27 The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 . .37 Settling the Ohio Lands 1787-1800 . .42 Ohio Statehood 1800-1812 . .61 Ohio and the Nation 1800-1900 . .73 Ohio’s Lands Today . .81 The Origin of Ohio’s County Names . .82 Bibliography . .85 Glossary . .86 Additional Reading . .88 Did you know that Ohio is Hi! I’m Simon and almost the same distance I’ll be your trail across as it is up and down guide as we learn (about 200 miles)? Our about the land we call Ohio. state is shaped in an unusual way. Some people think it looks like a flag waving in the wind. Others say it looks like a heart. The shape is mostly caused by the Ohio River on the east and south and Lake Erie in the north. It is the 35th largest state in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Ordinance.Pdf
    Name Class Date Forming a Government History and Geography The Northwest Territory Congress established the method for admitting new states to the Union in the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. The ordinance also established the Northwest Territory, which included the area that is now Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Study the map and chart below. Then complete the activity and answer the questions that follow. STEPS TO STATEHOOD Congress specifies that three to five territories will be carved out of the Northwest Territory. For each territory, Congress appoints Northwest Territory a governor, a secretary, and three judges. When a territory’s population reaches 5,000 free male inhabitants of voting age, it elects a territorial legislature and sends a nonvoting delegate to Congress. CANADA Once a territory’s population increases M is WISCONSIN to 60,000 free inhabitants, it becomes s is 1848 sip eligible for statehood and can draft a p i NEW state constitution. R MICHIGAN N i YORK v 1837 e Congress approves the state constitution, r W E and the territory becomes a state. PENNSYLVANIA S NORTHWEST TERRITORY 0 100 200 Miles 0 100 200 Kilometers OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA MD Albers Equal-Area Projection 1818 1816 1803 Sources: Record of America; The Oxford Companion to American History r e iv VIRGINIA R LOUISIANA Ohio KENTUCKY MAP ACTIVITY 1. Number the states that make up what was the Northwest Territory in the order in which the states were admitted to the Union. Start with 1 for the first state. 2. The Northwest Territory also included part of a present-day state not labeled on the map or listed above.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 Wisconsin Blue Book
    Significant events in Wisconsin history First nations 1668 Nicolas Perrot opened fur trade Wisconsin’s original residents were with Wisconsin Indians near Green Bay. Native American hunters who arrived 1672 Father Allouez and Father Louis here about 14,000 years ago. The area’s André built the St. François Xavier mis- first farmers appear to have been the sion at De Pere. Hopewell people, who raised corn, 1673 Louis Jolliet and Father Jacques squash, and pumpkins around 2,000 Marquette traveled the length of the years ago. They were also hunters and Mississippi River. fishers, and their trade routes stretched 1679 to the Atlantic Coast and the Gulf of Daniel Greysolon Sieur du Lhut Mexico. Later arrivals included the (Duluth) explored the western end of Chippewa, Ho-Chunk (Winnebago), Lake Superior. Mohican/Munsee, Menominee, Oneida, 1689 Perrot asserts the sovereignty of Potawatomi, and Sioux. France over various Wisconsin Indian tribes. Under the flag of France 1690 Lead mines are discovered in Wis- The written history of the state began consin and Iowa. with the accounts of French explorers. 1701–38 The Fox Indian Wars occurred. The French explored areas of Wiscon- 1755 Wisconsin Indians, under Charles sin, named places, and established trad- Langlade, helped defeat British Gen- ing posts; however, they were interested eral Braddock during the French and in the fur trade, rather than agricultural Indian War. settlement, and were never present in 1763 large numbers. The Treaty of Paris is signed, mak- ing Wisconsin part of British colonial 1634 Jean Nicolet became the first territory. known European to reach Wisconsin.
    [Show full text]