Understanding Quantitative Genetics in the Systems Biology Era Mengjin Zhu, Mei Yu, Shuhong Zhao
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2009, 5 161 International Journal of Biological Sciences 2009; 5(2):161-170 © Ivyspring International Publisher. All rights reserved Review Understanding Quantitative Genetics in the Systems Biology Era Mengjin Zhu, Mei Yu, Shuhong Zhao Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricul- tural University, Wuhan 430070, P. R. China Correspondence to: Shuhong Zhao, Key Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, P. R. China; Tel: +86-27-87284161; Fax: +86-27-87280408; E-mail: [email protected] Received: 2008.12.03; Accepted: 2009.01.21; Published: 2009.01.27 Abstract Biology is now entering the new era of systems biology and exerting a growing influence on the future development of various disciplines within life sciences. In early classical and mo- lecular periods of Biology, the theoretical frames of classical and molecular quantitative ge- netics have been systematically established, respectively. With the new advent of systems biology, there is occurring a paradigm shift in the field of quantitative genetics. Where and how the quantitative genetics would develop after having undergone its classical and mo- lecular periods? This is a difficult question to answer exactly. In this perspective article, the major effort was made to discuss the possible development of quantitative genetics in the systems biology era, and for which there is a high potentiality to develop towards "systems quantitative genetics". In our opinion, the systems quantitative genetics can be defined as a new discipline to address the generalized genetic laws of bioalleles controlling the heritable phenotypes of complex traits following a new dynamic network model. Other issues from quantitative genetic perspective relating to the genetical genomics, the updates of network model, and the future research prospects were also discussed. Key words: systems quantitative genetics; definition; dynamic network model; prospect 1. Introduction There is a trend in life sciences development that, the advent of systems biology would inevitably give as a discipline, the development of Biology depends explosive birth to a diversity of new fields being on accumulating and assimilating the new knowledge dressed up with a "systems" prefix as the "molecular" in other various disciplines within life sciences, and in in the molecular era. reverse, provides a common time division of their Quantitative genetics was founded, in evolu- historical stages. From Classical Biology to Molecular tionary terms, by the originators of the modern syn- Biology, various life sciences have been led into the thesis. This field is a relatively independent branch of molecular era, e.g., the emergences of the molecular life sciences but the one increasingly applied in a wide biology-related disciplines such as molecular nu- spectrum of scientific disciplines such as evolution, triology, molecular immunology, molecular ecology, animal and plant breeding, behavioral genetics, con- molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Now, the servation biology, medical genetics, ecology, anthro- time has come for Biology to enter the era of systems pology and psychology [4-11], which particularly has biology after having undergone its classical and mo- played a crucial role in relieving the worldwide fam- lecular periods [1-3], which is exerting an increasing ine through genetic improvement of the productivity influence on the transformation of life sciences from a of the agricultural animals and crops. It is anticipated reductionist to a systemic paradigm. It is believed that that new development in quantitative genetics will be http://www.biolsci.org Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2009, 5 162 of great benefit to various other branches of life sci- and soft inheritance, the genetic information flow ences. An outline of near 100 years' published litera- from DNA polymorphisms to phenotypic variations tures in this field had documented that the historical is not linearly dispersed in living organisms. This de- development of quantitative genetics was rough run- termines that there is no complete congruence be- ning after that of Biology. In its history, the quantita- tween DNA and phenotype. It is very necessary to tive genetics had gone through the first and second open the black box between genes and phenotypes. developmental stages, i.e., the classical and molecular In fact, the phenomena that heritable component quantitative genetics, respectively [12] [13], which, in of phenotypic variation was aroused without DNA despite of having partial overlap, were as expected sequence changes have been proven to have a fre- corresponding to the classical and molecular periods quent occurrence at both cellular and organism levels of Biology. It could be concluded that Biology has also [16-18], which reveal that the variome at the DNA provided the discipline background for the develop- level cannot provide a full elucidation of the heritable ment of quantitative genetics. After the long devel- phenotypes. As suggested by Johannes et al. (2008), opment from classical to molecular quantitative ge- more effort should be given to capture the potentially netics, it might be timely for quantitative genetics to dynamic interplay between chromatin and DNA se- be brought into the third developmental stage in the quence factors in complex traits [19]. There are also coming era of systems biology. many evidences, more accumulated in plants, that non-Mendelian genetic factors modifying the DNA 2. Proposal of systems quantitative genetics can be inherited. On many occasions, quantitative 2.1 Background and definition genetic investigations of target traits only from DNA polymorphisms is no longer absolutely appropriate, Our knowledge of the classical and molecular though it is still debated how important the non-DNA quantitative genetics has undergone a striking expan- sequence variation is in controlling the inheritance of sion in the last century. The classical quantitative ge- phenotypes. Up to date, some pilot work to address netics considers a black box to reveal the holistic this subject has already been undertaken, in which the status of all genes associated with the variation of molecular information mediated between DNA and investigated traits by complicated statistical methods phenotype such as RNA splicing, proteins, metabo- [14]. The subsequently (but partially overlapped in lites or their combinations has been brought into the time) established molecular quantitative genetics new research area of quantitative genetics [20-23]. mainly focuses on evaluating the coupling association How to weigh and integrate the contribution of bio- of the polymorphic DNA sites with the phenotypic logical molecules at different levels and their interac- variations of quantitative and complex traits, as well tions to the heritable component of phenotypes is a as dissecting their genetic architectures, but which new exciting challenge brought to us, of which both never pays attention to the details of how genetic in- classical and molecular quantitative genetics are in- formation is transcriptionally and translationally capable. processed. The absence of the inside functional in- Further development of quantitative genetics formation prevents a definitive identification of the based on the systems biology thinking would provide gene(s) underlying the control of target traits, which an alternative solution to this challenge. Now it is usually requires a subsequent validation of the gene perhaps timely for quantitative genetics to enter into function in more future generations of the same its third developmental stage. Here, as coined by us population or other different populations, or quanti- previously [24], we propose to use the term "Systems tative complementation test. In living organisms, Quantitative Genetics" as the general name of the there are complex genetic and epigenetic mechanisms third generation of quantitative genetics. Aylor and to the molecular regulation of the phenotypic charac- Zeng (2008) have also introduced the concept of sys- teristics of a trait at multiple levels, including DNA tems biology into quantitative genetics, in which a sequence variation, pre- and post- transcription framework was proposed to estimate and interpret events, pre- and post-translation processings, and the epistasis [25], but it involved the gene expression hierarchical or global gene network. It is now well traits rather than the macroscopic phenotype of bio- known that, from DNA to phenotype, the deletion, medically, economically, or evolutionarily important addition, substitution, covalent modification, alterna- traits. In our opinion, the systems quantitative genet- tive packaging of nucleotides, alternative splicing of ics is an interdisciplinary marriage of quantitative mRNAs, and even other kinds of soft inheritance genetics and systems biology. Historically inherited regulations widely participate in the process of han- from the classical and molecular quantitative genetics, dling genetic information [15]. Involving in both hard the systems quantitative genetics, following a new http://www.biolsci.org Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2009, 5 163 dynamic network model, could be defined as a new fast rate. It appears that the genetical genomics is now discipline that addresses the generalized genetic laws leading the frontier research of quantitative genetics of bioalleles