DOCSLIB.ORG

Viewing Guide Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A Film by STEPHANIE SOECHTIG VIEWING GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 ABOUT THE FILM Summary 4 Featured Subjects and Organizations Key Issue Areas 5 A Letter From the Filmmaker Stephanie Soechtig 6 THE EVENT Tips for Leading the Discussion 7 Conversation Starters 7 Discussion Questions 8 BACKGROUND ON THE ISSUES Stats From the Film 12 Gun Lobby Myths Debunked *Courtesy of Everytown for Gun Safety 13 Glossary 14 RESOURCES 15 TAKE ACTION After Watching UNDER THE GUN, I am Ready To . 17 PARTNERS 18 SUBJECTS FEATURED IN FILM 20 CREDITS 22 Please share your event photos and highlights from your post-screening discussion with us via Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram using #UNDERTHEGUN, or email us at [email protected]. INTRODUCTION DEAR SCREENING HOST, Thank you so much for taking the time to bring this important issue to your community. The tagline for this film is “IN THE GUN DEBATE, TRUTH IS THE ULTIMATE WEAPON.” Please use the resources in this discussion guide to help foster a truthful and respectful dialogue about gun violence and what YOU, and everyone in the room, can do to ACT. Talking about gun violence won’t save lives, but collective action will. Thank you for your support and utilizing UNDER THE GUN to educate your community. We hope the event you are hosting will lead to changing hearts and minds, and lead to meaningful action. Please share your event photos and highlights from your post-screening discussion with us via Facebook, Twitter, Instagram using #UNDERTHEGUN or email us at [email protected]. VIEWING GUIDE 3 ABOUT THE FILM Summary In the past few years, a drastic rise in mass shootings has ripped across the United States, compounding an epidemic of gun violence in our country. Despite a growing body count at the hands of gun violence, and the outpouring of shock and outrage that comes with it, our nation has failed to respond with meaningful action. What is keeping the two sides of this debate—those favoring stricter gun laws, and Second Amendment purists like the NRA—from finding common ground? Through the lens of families impacted by the mass shootings in Newtown, Connecticut; Aurora, Colorado; Isla Vista, California; Tucson, Arizona; as well as the daily gun violence in Chicago, the film examines why our politicians are failing to act. Director Stephanie Soechtig and executive producer Katie Couric (the team behind the 2014 Sundance Film Festival hit FED UP) join forces again to create a documentary that is scrupulously comprehensive and decidedly fair to both sides of one of the most polarizing issues facing our country today. Searing and powerful with never-before-seen footage of the shooting in Aurora, UNDER THE GUN gives a human face to a crisis that is costing us in blood and scarring the conscience of a nation. VIEWING GUIDE 4 ABOUT THE FILM Featured Subjects and Organizations • Annette Holt, advocate • John Feinblatt and Richard • Robyn Thomas, Law Center and survivor Martinez, Everytown for to Prevent Gun Violence • Arkadi Gerney, Center Gun Safety • Sandy and Lonnie Phillips, for American Progress • Josh Sugarmann, The Violence Jessi’s Message • Carolyn McCarthy, former Policy Center • Shannon Watts, Moms Demand U.S. congresswoman (D-NY) • Kaile Shilling, coalition director Action for Gun Sense in America • Charles Houser, ATF special agent of the Violence Prevention • Tom Diaz, author of Coalition of Greater Los Angeles Making a Killing • Dan Gross, The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence • Mark Follman, Mother Jones • Victoria Montgomery, • Daniel Webster, director of • Members of the Virginia Open Carry Texas Johns Hopkins Center for Citizens Defense League • William Vizzard, former Gun Policy and Research • Michael Waldman, Brennan Bureau of Alcohol, • Father Michael Pfleger, Saint Center for Justice Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Sabina Church, Chicago, IL • Pamela and Tom Bosley, (ATF) agent • Gabby Giffords and Mark Kelly, Purpose Over Pain Americans for Responsible • Representative Robin Kelly, Solutions U.S. congresswoman (D-IL) • Jackie and Mark Barden, • Richard Feldman, former NRA Sandy Hook Promise lobbyist Please see the partners section (page 18) to learn more about each of these organizations. Key Issue Areas • Background checks • Gun lobby • Open carry • Bad apple gun dealers • Gun violence perpetrators • Responsible gun ownership • Gun violence research prohibitions • History of the National Rifle • Second Amendment • Gun violence in Chicago Association • Straw purchase • Gun law loopholes • Mass shootings • Terror gap • Gun laws and policy • Mental health • Urban violence VIEWING GUIDE 5 ABOUT THE FILM A Letter from the Filmmaker STEPHANIE SOECHTIG Some of my favorite memories of growing up in Brookfield, Connecticut, involve summer nights at the Edmond Town Hall in Newtown, watching $2 movies. I don’t think my 17-year-old self would have ever believed that I’d be returning to Newtown as a director to cover one of our country’s most devastating massacres. I was filming FED UP when the Sandy Hook shooting happened. I still remember how surreal it felt when I heard the newscaster say “Newtown” in relation to a mass shooting… things like that just don’t happen in our sleepy little town. It felt like nothing ever happened in our town—danger only loomed in the city and dark alleys. Never in a first grade classroom. I was pregnant at the time of the shooting and it felt like I was bringing my son into a very different world than the world before December 14th. So when Katie called me after the Isla Vista shooting and asked me if I thought we should make a film about the gun violence crisis, I felt a new motivation. I started researching the gun violence epidemic and was amazed by the way our country was approaching the issue. I wanted to try to tell this story with a holistic approach and in a way that could break through some of the “noise” that has surrounded this issue for so long. The debate over guns and gun laws has always seemed like a very black-and-white issue, but I was really intrigued to learn that not only is there a lot of gray area, but in fact, common ground. I was also so interested in the parents who had lost their children to gun violence and had gone on to become gun violence activists—I don’t know if I would be able to get out of bed if something like that happened to my son and yet here are these incredible parents that have made this their life’s work. How had they found the strength to take up such a tremendous battle? Their stories were the backbone to the story we wanted to tell. —Stephanie Soechtig VIEWING GUIDE 6 THE EVENT Tips for Leading the Discussion Talking about gun violence can be difficult. Be mindful that you may have participants with different perspectives, some of which may be strongly held, and that some people may be deeply sensitive about the issue, including those touched by gun violence as well as gun owners. To set the stage for a productive conversation, consider the following tips: • Ask everyone to be respectful. Before you begin the conversation, remind everyone to be respectful of others’ viewpoints and to be CONVERSATION STARTERS mindful of listening as well as participating in order to create a safe environment for all attendees to be open to expanding their thinking. 1. Before watching the film, how concerned were you • Be knowledgeable. You don’t need to be an expert on the gun about the issue of gun debate to lead the discussion, but understanding the basic violence? concepts covered in the film can help. Read through this guide before your event, identify a few questions from those provided 2. Was anything in the film below to use for your discussion, and review a few of the resources surprising or shocking to you? Please share one moment or included here to help frame the conversation around your chosen one thing you learned. questions. • Let everyone speak. Be mindful of leading an inclusive discussion 3. Did the film change your where everyone has a chance to be heard, and remind participants mind or shift your perspective to share in a way that invites open dialogue rather than lecturing about gun violence in America? or debating. If so, how? • Create a safe space. Be aware that this film covers a very sensitive 4. Do you have any personal topic, addresses violence, and may be triggering to viewers. experience with guns or Depending on the group you plan on inviting, you may want to gun violence? Is it positive invite a local survivor support organization to attend or have or negative? resources available should someone require additional support following the screening. • Make your event meaningful. Plan and provide ways that your audience can take action after seeing the film to help create change, whether it’s directly associated with your organization through email collection or fundraising, making your community safer through encouraging responsible gun storage, or direct policy action to help pass an upcoming ballot initiative or elect pro-common sense lawmakers. Review the Take Action section of this guide for some ideas on how you can direct your audience to take action to help end gun violence. VIEWING GUIDE 7 THE EVENT Discussion Questions 1. The Second Amendment reads, “A well regulated Militia, 4. In the film, journalist Mark Follman says, “We studied 70 being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of public mass shootings and not a single one was stopped the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” this way by an ordinary citizen who happened to be there with a firearm.” a.
Recommended publications
  • Brief of Amicus Curiae Everytown for Gun Safety in Support of Appellees

    Brief of Amicus Curiae Everytown for Gun Safety in Support of Appellees

    Case: 14-15408 06/24/2014 ID: 9144045 DktEntry: 54 Page: 1 of 38 No. 14-15408 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit LEONARD FYOCK et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, – v. – CITY OF SUNNYVALE et al., Defendants-Appellees. ___________________________ ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. 5:13-CV-05807-RMW BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES GREGORY SILBERT Counsel of Record VANESSA W. CHANDIS WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES, LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 (212) 310-8000 Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Everytown for Gun Safety Case: 14-15408 06/24/2014 ID: 9144045 DktEntry: 54 Page: 2 of 38 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Amicus Curiae Everytown for Gun Safety has no parent corporations. It has no stock, and therefore, no publicly held company owns 10% or more of its stock. /s/ Gregory Silbert Gregory Silbert US_ACTIVE:\44481206\14\99995.5019 Case: 14-15408 06/24/2014 ID: 9144045 DktEntry: 54 Page: 3 of 38 Table of Contents ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................ 3 I. VARIATIONS IN LOCAL GUN LAWS ARE PART OF A LONGSTANDING TRADITION THAT DEFINES THE CONTOURS OF THE RIGHT PROTECTED BY THE SECOND AMENDMENT. ............................................................................................. 3 A. Historically, Local Laws Regarding Gun Use And Possession Have Varied To Meet The Needs Of Each Community. ...................... 4 B. California Courts Have Long Recognized The Appropriateness Of Tailoring Firearm Laws To Local Conditions. ................................ 9 C. The Citizens Of Sunnyvale Acted Consistently With This Longstanding Tradition When They Enacted the Ordinance.............. 10 II. THE ORDINANCE BANNING LARGE-CAPACITY MAGAZINES IS CONSTITUTIONAL.
  • Gun Violence and Mass Shootings Is in the News Frequently

    Gun Violence and Mass Shootings Is in the News Frequently

    Gun Violence and Mass ShootiADLng sAnnounces The PROTECT Plan to Fig Table Talk: Family Conversations About Current Events Take Action Against Domestic Te Te l l t h e W h i t e H o u s e a n d y o u r W e n e e d A D L ' s P R O T E C T P l a n t h e t h r e a t o f e x t r e m i s t v i o SIGN THE PETITION Bbjeter / CC BY-SA 3.0 Updated March 2021 Talking with Children about Gun Violence The issue of gun violence and mass shootings is in the news frequently. Young people are usually aware of what is happening and will want to talk about it. However, it is a sensitive, scary, and potentially painful topic. Before raising the matter with children, consider your child’s personality. Will the conversation ease your child's fears or add to it? 1 / 7 For some youth, it is better to be proactive and raise the topic without their prompting. For others, following their lead and their questions is a better approach. When you discuss this topic with children, here are some things to keep in mind: Be prepared yourself so you can be there for them emotionally. Make sure you have set aside enough time to hear children's thoughts, questions, and feelings. Provide accurate information about their school’s safety procedures and reassure them that they are safe. Be careful when describing the perpetrator.
  • America Under the Gun a 50-State Analysis of Gun Violence and Its Link to Weak State Gun Laws

    America Under the Gun a 50-State Analysis of Gun Violence and Its Link to Weak State Gun Laws

    CAP ILLUSTRATION/ISTOCK PHOTO ILLUSTRATION/ISTOCK CAP America Under the Gun A 50-State Analysis of Gun Violence and Its Link to Weak State Gun Laws Arkadi Gerney, Chelsea Parsons, and Charles Posner April 2013 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG America Under the Gun A 50-State Analysis of Gun Violence and Its Link to Weak State Gun Laws Arkadi Gerney, Chelsea Parsons, and Charles Posner April 2013 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 3 10 indicators of gun violence 27 The link between high levels of gun violence and weak state gun laws 35 Conclusion 37 About the authors 39 Methodology 42 Endnotes 45 Appendix: Fact sheets on the 10 states with the highest levels of gun violence 45 Alaska 47 Alabama 49 Arkansas 51 Arizona 53 Georgia 55 Louisiana 57 Missouri 59 Mississippi 61 New Mexico 63 South Carolina Introduction and summary In the aftermath of mass shootings and other gun-related tragedies, there is often a surge of interest on the part of community leaders, social-science researchers, and elected officials to root out the causes of gun violence in an effort to prevent such tragedies from occurring again. Any study into the causes of gun violence is necessarily complicated, however, as there are innumerable factors that contribute to the nature and prevalence of gun-related violence in any community. Despite this complex web of factors that influence the rate of gun violence, this report finds a clear link between high levels of gun violence and weak state gun laws. Across the key indicators of gun violence that we analyzed, the 10 states with the weakest gun laws collectively have an aggregate level of gun violence that is more than twice as high—104 percent higher, in fact—than the 10 states with the strongest gun laws.
  • Stories of Gun Violence Across America: Indianapolis PHOTOGRAPHY EXHIBIT Ittakesus-Indy.Org

    Stories of Gun Violence Across America: Indianapolis PHOTOGRAPHY EXHIBIT Ittakesus-Indy.Org

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: September 4, 2018 Media Contact: Kate Appel, Chair Faith, Justice & the Arts 317.507.7128, [email protected] Stories of Gun Violence Across America: Indianapolis PHOTOGRAPHY EXHIBIT ittakesus-indy.org EXHIBIT LOCATIONS: Phoenix Theatre, 705 North Illinois Street, Indianapolis 46204 (Sept. 21 - Nov. 13) St. Paul's Episcopal Church, 6050 North Meridian Street, Indianapolis 46208 (Sept. 23 - Oct. 7) Noblesville City Hall, 16 South 10th Street, Noblesville, IN 46060 (Sept. 23 - Nov. 13) Circle City Industrial Complex, Schwitzer Gallery, 1125 Brookside Ave, Indianapolis 46204 (Oct. 5 - 26) Martin Luther King Center, 40 West 40th Street, Indianapolis 46208 (Oct. 6 - 20) Central Library, 40 East St. Clair Street, Indianapolis 46204 (Oct. 10 - Nov. 13) St. Paul's On The Way, 803 Broad Ripple Avenue, Indianapolis 46220 (Oct. 12 - Nov. 13) PRESENTED BY: Faith, Justice and the Arts (Indianapolis) Joe Quint, Photographer (Brooklyn, N.Y.) Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America (Indiana) ABOUT THE EXHIBIT: For the past four years, documentary photographer Joe Quint has worked to tell the stories of gun violence survivors, including the family members of victims and those who've witnessed horrific acts of violence. The work isn’t about politics or policy, or 2nd Amendment rights vs. gun control. “It's about honest storytelling,” said Quint, “and bringing stories of trauma, grief and strength to life – without agenda. The goal is to tell a diverse story, both in terms of demographics and type of incident, and show how none of us are ever more than one or two degrees of separation away from this epidemic.” In partnership with Faith, Justice and the Arts (fjaindy.org), an initiative of St.
  • Libertarian Gun Control

    Libertarian Gun Control

    Libertarian Gun Control Ian Ayres* & Fredrick E. Vars** Abstract: Individuals should have the option to waive their Second Amendment rights to keep and bear arms by adding their names to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System. Every year about 20,000 Americans kill themselves with firearms. We present a low- cost and constitutional system that could in just a few years easily save thousands of these lives as people with mental health problems during moments of clarity rationally opt to restrain their future selves. Moreover, our system, which includes the option of providing email notifications of an individual’s waiver to third parties, can promote a marketplace of informed association. Just as Heller emphasizes the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms as furthering the “core” individual right to self-defense, a world where individuals can credibly communicate waiver of their Second Amendment rights can facilitate the reasonable choices of others to limit association with those who may possess weapons. Forcing Second Amendment interests to contend with First Amendment associational interests can thus enhance the joint liberty of those seeking to best defend themselves. We provide the results of two surveys showing that close to a third of the general population and more than 40% of those with previously diagnosed mental health concerns indicated that they would be willing to add their name to a “No Guns” list. *William K. Townsend Professor, Yale Law School. [email protected]. ** Professor, University of Alabama School of Law. Bruce Ackerman, Joseph Blocher and Jack Hitt provided helpful comments. Griffin Austin, Greg Conyers, Anthony Cozart and Samuel Dong provided excellent research assistance.
  • 10 Years Later: the Second Amendment and Public Safety After Heller Bradycenter.Org Executive Summary

    10 Years Later: the Second Amendment and Public Safety After Heller Bradycenter.Org Executive Summary

    10 THE SECOND AMENDMENT YEARS AND PUBLIC SAFETY L ATER AFTER HELLER CONTENTS 01 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 03 THE HELLER DECISION – A SEISMIC SHIFT IN SECOND AMENDMENT INTERPRETATION 06 GREAT STAKES – WHAT GUN REGULATION IS PERMISSIBLE IN THE AFTERMATH OF HELLER 07 BATTLE IN THE COURTS – THE FIRST TEN YEARS 13 THE NEXT TEN YEARS 14 ENDNOTES Acknowledgments This report was a collaborative effort. Contributing authors include Joshua Scharff from the Brady Center, Anna M. Kelly and Madeleine Bech from Hogan Lovells, and Suzan Charlton and Joseph DuChane from Covington & Burling, LLP. Zayden Tethong, Caitlin Nelson, and Jenna Casolo from the Brady Center provided research assistance. II 10 YEARS LATER: THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY AFTER HELLER BRADYCENTER.ORG EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For two hundred years, almost all judges in In the decade since Heller, two narratives have America agreed that the Second Amendment emerged regarding the decision’s application was intended, as the Framers stated in its text, and scope. These two narratives have drawn to protect the “well-regulated militia” that the battle lines over what laws and policies can be Framers saw as “necessary to a free state” and implemented to prevent gun violence, and they nothing more. will continue to define the battle over the Second Amendment into the foreseeable future. But ten years ago, all of that changed. On June 26, 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court issued One vision is represented by the Brady Center a 5-4 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, to Prevent Gun Violence, which has been which held for the first time that “law-abiding, the leading legal voice of the gun violence responsible Americans” have a right to possess prevention movement for over 30 years, as well guns in the home – even if they have nothing to as other gun violence prevention groups.
  • Democrats, DOA 209 ELEVEN the People's Prayer 229 EPILOGUE Tallahassee Hi-Ho 236

    Democrats, DOA 209 ELEVEN the People's Prayer 229 EPILOGUE Tallahassee Hi-Ho 236

    Stupid White Men and Other Sorry Excuses for the State of the Nation Michael Moore Copyright @ 2001 by Michael Moore. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address HarperCollins Publishers Inc., 10 East 53rd Street, New York, NY 10022. HarperCollins books may be purchased for educational, business, or sales promotional use. For information please write: Special Markets Department, HarperCollins Publishers Inc., 10 East 53 rd Street, New York, NY 10022. FIRST EDITION Designed by Kris Tobiassen Printed on acid-free paper Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data has been applied for. ISBN 0-06-039245-2 02 03 04 05 WB/QWM 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 FOR AL HIRYELA It's amazing I won. I was running against peace, prosperity, and incumbency. -GEORGE W. BUSH, JUNE 14, 2001, speaking to Swedish Prime Minister Goran Perrson, unaware that a live television camera was still rolling CONTENTS INTRODUCTION xi ONE A Very American Coup 1 TWO Dear George 29 THREE Dow Wow Wow 47 FOUR Kill Whitey 56 FIVE Idiot Nation 85 SIX Nice Planet Nobody Home 119 SEVEN The End of Men 142 EIGHT We're Number One! 163 NINE One Big Happy Prison 195 TEN Democrats, DOA 209 ELEVEN The People's Prayer 229 EPILOGUE Tallahassee Hi-Ho 236 NOTES AND SOURCES 257 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 275 ABOUT THE AUTHOR 279 INTRODUCTION THERE ARE THOSE who say it all started to unravel the night of November 7, 2 000, when Jeb Bush gave his brother George Jr.
  • Decl. of Alexandra Robert Gordon (2:17-Cv-00903-WBS-KJN) Exhibit 39

    Decl. of Alexandra Robert Gordon (2:17-Cv-00903-WBS-KJN) Exhibit 39

    1 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California 2 TAMAR PACHTER, State Bar No. 146083 Supervising Deputy Attorney General 3 ALEXANDRA ROBERT GORDON, State Bar No. 207650 JOHN D. ECHEVERRIA, State Bar No. 268843 4 Deputy Attorneys General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 5 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5509 6 Fax: (415) 703-5480 E-mail: [email protected] 7 Attorneys for Defendants 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 WILLIAM WIESE, et al., 2:17-cv-00903-WBS-KJN 14 Plaintiff, EXHIBITS 39 THROUGH 42 TO THE DECLARATION OF ALEXANDRA 15 v. ROBERT GORDON IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 16 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER XAVIER BECERRA, et al., AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 17 Defendant. Date: June 16, 2017 18 Time: 10:00 a.m. Courtroom: 5 19 Judge: The Honorable William B. Shubb Action Filed: April 28, 2017 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Decl. of Alexandra Robert Gordon (2:17-cv-00903-WBS-KJN) Exhibit 39 Gordon Declaration 01492 Gordon Declaration 01493 MARCH 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was prepared by the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence using data obtained and analyzed by the experts at Crime Gun Solutions LLC . Founded in 1983, the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence is a national non-profit organization working to reduce the tragic toll of gun violence in America through education, research, and legal advocacy. The programs of the Center complement the legislative initiatives of its sister organization, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence united with the Million Mom March.
  • Combating U.S. Gun Trafficking to Mexico

    Combating U.S. Gun Trafficking to Mexico

    Combating U.S. Gun Trafficking to Mexico A STUDY CONDUCTED FOR THE BRADY CAMPAIGN TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE BY DEVIKA AGRAWAL THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY SPRING 2019 The author conducted this study as part of the program of professional education at the Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California at Berkeley. This paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the course requirements for the Master of Public Policy degree. The judgements and conclusions are solely those of the author, and are not necessarily endorsed by the Goldman School of Public Policy, by the University of California or by any other agency. 1 Table of Contents PART ONE: UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM .......................................................... 3 GUNS IN MEXICO: QUANTITIES, SOURCES OF ORIGIN, AND FINAL DESTINATIONS ...................... 3 THE CASE FOR U.S. GOVERNMENT ACTION .............................................................................................. 8 DIAGNOSIS OF THE PROBLEM .................................................................................................................... 13 PART TWO: SOLVING THE PROBLEM THROUGH POLICY ......................................... 29 POLICY ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................................................................. 31 ANALYSIS BY CRITERIA .................................................................................................................................. 33 FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................................................
  • Brief of Amicus Curiae Everytown for Gun Safety in Support of Defendant-Appellee and Affirmance ______

    Brief of Amicus Curiae Everytown for Gun Safety in Support of Defendant-Appellee and Affirmance ______

    Appellate Case: 14-1290 Document: 01019423108 Date Filed: 04/29/2015 Page: 1 No. 14-1290, 14-1292 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ COLORADO OUTFITTERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs- Appellants, v. JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Governor of the State of Colorado, Defendant- Appellee. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ JIM BEICKER, Sheriff of Fremont County, et al., Plaintiffs- Appellants, v. JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Governor of the State of Colorado, Defendant- Appellee. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado (No. 1:13-cv-01300) (Krieger, J.) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT-APPELLEE AND AFFIRMANCE ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  • “Assault Weapon” Myths

    “Assault Weapon” Myths

    “ASSAULT WEAPON” MYTHS E. Gregory Wallace Scary black rifles that spray bullets like machine guns. Military arms designed solely for killing on the battlefield. Weapons of choice for mass shooters. These are common descriptions of so-called “assault weapons,” a favorite target for those who want to eliminate gun violence by eliminating guns. Several states and localities currently ban “assault weapons,” as did the federal government from 1994-2004. In response to recent mass shootings, bills have been introduced in Congress to create a new national ban. Lawmakers and judges often use these descriptions to justify such bans. But are the descriptions factual? If not, what does that say about the laws and court decisions that rely on them? While there is no generally agreed-upon definition of “assault weapon,” laws banning such weapons typically criminalize possession or transfer of semiautomatic rifles with detachable magazines and at least one specified feature such as a pistol grip, telescoping stock, flash suppressor, barrel shroud, bayonet mount, or grenade launcher.1 Other “assault weapon” bans prohibit certain semiautomatic rifles, shotguns, and pistols by name and by features, along with any copies, duplicates, or variants.2 The main target of these bans is the AR-15 rifle, the most popular rifle in America, owned by millions for lawful purposes including self-defense.3 The AR-15 looks like a fully automatic military M4 carbine or M16 rifle, but it has a semiautomatic firing system like most modern handguns. Legislatures imposing “assault Professor of Law, Campbell University School of Law. Professor Wallace is a competitive shooter and certified firearms instructor.
  • Brady Campaign (Handgun Control, Inc.) 2001 "Report Card" Again Gives Higher "Grades" to States with Higher

    Brady Campaign (Handgun Control, Inc.) 2001 "Report Card" Again Gives Higher "Grades" to States with Higher

    Library | Fact Sheets Page 1 of 4 What's New Library | Fact Sheets Fact Sheets FAQs State Gun Laws Printer Friendly Version Federal Gun Laws Firearms Glossary Articles Armed Citizen Speeches Bibliography Brady Campaign (Handgun Control, Inc.) Other Resources 2001 "Report Card" Again Gives Higher "Grades" To States With Higher Violent Crime Rates 1/23/02 As it has for several years, the "gun control" lobby has again produced an annual "report card" on which it grades the states on their "gun laws protecting children." As in previous years, the more "gun control," the higher the grade. Brady doesn't care how much crime a state has, or whether "gun control," or a relative lack of it, has an effect on crime. The group certainly doesn't consider the factors that the FBI, other law enforcement professionals, criminologists, and sociologists associate with crime levels, such as prosecution, incarceration and other aspects of the criminal justice system; the economy; demographics and cultural factors; and the prevalence of drugs. Why does Brady base its grades only upon the amount of "gun control" in a state, without regard for the results? Simple. Brady hates guns. It wants them outlawed or, failing that, severely restricted. As a result, its best grades go to states with worse crime rates, because states with more "gun control" generally have higher crime rates, as shown below: Number of Avg. Number of 5-Yr. "Grade" States/2001 Current Rate States/5-Yr. Avg. Avg. Rate "A" (5) 490.6 (1) 820.9 "B" (5) 444.0 (9) 502.1 "C" (11) 419.7 (14) 517.8 "D" (22) 426.9 (21) 426.6 "F" (7) 333.0 (5) 410.9 Brady's favorite state is Maryland.