The History of Balfour+Manson LLP: the First 125 Years As Recalled By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The History of Balfour+Manson LLP: the First 125 Years As Recalled By The History of Balfour+Manson LLP: the first 125 years As recalled by Ian Balfour Grandson of William Balfour, who founded the firm in 1887 History of Balfour+Manson LLP Index Page Section One Background to the Partnership (1855-1903) 2 Section Two Establishing the business (1904 to 1938) 12 Section Three World War Two and aftermath (1939 to 1949) 24 Section Four The first two mergers (1950 to 1959) 40 Section Five Specialization in the Sixties (1960 to 1969) 56 Section Six North and South, Up and Down (1970 to 1979) 71 Section Seven Rapid expansion (1980 to 1989) 88 Section Eight Queen Street to Hill Street (1990 to 1999) 109 Section Nine Into the Twenty-first Century (2000 to 2013) 131 Section Ten Public Appointments 147 Appendix One Background to the mergers 153 Appendix Two The present building 159 Appendix Three Fee-earners, 1877 to now 170 Section One - Background to the Partnership (1855-1903) Overview of 1855 to 1903 On 4th November 1887, a 32-year-old Orcadian, William Balfour, who had just completed a five-year apprenticeship, put up his plate as a Law Agent at 76 Queen Street in Edinburgh. The business prospered and sixteen years later, most of which were spent at 3 Queen Street, he invited a fellow Orcadian, his 29-year-old nephew, Peter Manson, to enter into partnership. Their early years, their apprenticeships and the legal scene in their adopted city at the end of the nineteenth century are the background to the formation of Balfour & Manson SSC in 1904. William Balfour (left) and Peter Manson (right), the first partners of the firm, were both originally from Orkney. William Balfour (1855-1939) Early years William Balfour was born in 1855 at the farm of Berriedale on Westray, the north- west-most of the Orkney Islands. His father, George, was a tenant farmer and his mother, Janet, came from the neighbouring island of Sanday. William, their fifth child, was educated at Westray Public School; although he also worked on the farm, he did so with a textbook resting on the handles of the plough, using his photographic memory to store away knowledge that would take him, at the age of eighteen, to a business career in the Central Belt of Scotland. 3 The farm of Berriedale on Westray. William Balfour maintained the Westray connection for the rest of his life, visiting it annually for both business and pleasure. He went first to Glasgow, studying for several years to become a patent agent. He then preferred a career in law and, moving to Edinburgh, he served a five-year apprenticeship from 1882 to 1887 in the front basement room of the two-partner firm of Duncan Smith & MacLaren at 62 Frederick Street. By coincidence, his son, Francis, acquired the right to purchase that room, along with the rest of the building, shortly after William Balfour’s death in 1939; by a further coincidence, his grandson, his namesake William, started his legal career in 1962 in the same room. By that time, generations of apprentices had scratched their names on the windows of the room – ostensibly to check whether stones in the rings they were handling in executries were genuine, because only real diamonds cut glass. Becoming a Law Agent The description Solicitor was not commonly used by lawyers in general practice until the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1933 provided that ‘all Law Agents in Scotland are now to be known as Solicitors’. Between 1873 and 1933, there were two ways of becoming a Law Agent in Scotland. One was to obtain a Scottish University degree in law and to serve a three-year apprenticeship in an office. The other was to pass a preliminary examination in general knowledge, set by the Incorporated Society of Law Agents, and to serve a five-year apprenticeship. Both routes culminated in the Society’s final exams, followed by an application to the Court of Session for registration under the Law Agents (Scotland) Act 1873. See the note at the end of this section about the use of the words ‘Law Agent’ after 1933. William Balfour took the longer of the two routes; during the five-year apprenticeship he attended one class at the University of Edinburgh from 9 to 10 am and two more classes between 4 and 6 pm, with the time between spent in the office, without matriculating – as did the next two partners, Peter Manson and Francis Balfour. It was common in those days to attend lectures without matriculating and so without 4 graduating, either through lack of funds or through not regarding a degree as important for a Law Agent’s career. Attending lectures was important, because there were almost no student textbooks and no law library at the university, so listening and taking notes was the way to learn. One of the three compulsory papers in the Law Agents’ exams included translation from set books in Latin. William Balfour’s remarkable memory made up for his limited knowledge of the classics; to prepare for this exam, he memorized the text from books that set out the Latin on the left-hand page and an English translation on the facing page. When he came to a Latin passage in the exam paper, he mentally identified its location on the left-hand page and wrote down the corresponding English paragraph on the right-hand page. The exam questions were still in Latin when the writer studied Civil Law at the University of Edinburgh in 1953 – part of one of the exam papers is reproduced in section four. When William Balfour came to Edinburgh in 1882, there were three hundred horse-drawn tramcars and over one thousand horses. Advertisers realized the potential and tramcar destinations became difficult to spot among hoardings for Bovril and other groceries. Notary Public and SSC After passing his final exams and registering as a Law Agent, William Balfour put up his plate on 4th November 1887 outside a flat at 76 Queen Street – literally, a new brass plate, with his name on it as Law Agent. In 1887, there were 546 Law Agents in Edinburgh and Leith; many were single practitioners, or in partnerships of two or three; the largest firm had six partners. He moved temporarily in 1889-90 to a flat at 6 North Charlotte Street and then back to 76 Queen Street for three years. In 1893 he rented a flat at 3 Queen Street and practised from there for the next fifteen years, until 1908. The description of Law Agents as Solicitors was becoming more popular by the end of the nineteenth century, and the earliest extant document in the firm’s records is a public notice in the Edinburgh Gazette in 1897 signed by ‘William Balfour, Solicitor, 3 Queen Street, Edinburgh’. 5 He had applied immediately to become a Notary Public – for Notaries, see section ten; this entitled him to solemnize legal documents. In 1899 he joined the hundred- year-old Society of Solicitors in the Supreme Courts of Scotland and for the rest of his life he signed his letters as ‘William Balfour, SSC’, believing that the full title on his letterheads was more meaningful to the general public than the letters ‘WS’ – Writer to the Signet – the other, and more prestigious, legal society in Scotland. The SSC Society had recently, in 1892, completed the splendid new Solicitors’ Buildings, containing its Library and Hall, rising for six floors from the Cowgate and connected by a bridge to Parliament House. A hundred years later, the writer became the Secretary of the SSC Society, and a large part of his responsibility is keeping this venerable building in good repair and adapting it to modern heating, lighting and information technology. William Balfour’s office for fifteen years, between 1893 and 1908, was a flat at 3 Queen Street. This photograph shows No. 3 (left) and No. 4 (right) today. They are still leased out as offices, with the description: ‘Prominently situated overlooking the picturesque Queen Street Gardens, 3 & 4 Queen Street form part of a handsome terrace of stone and slate townhouses, conveniently located within Edinburgh’s Golden Rectangle. The accommodation provides open plan space and suites are available to lease on highly flexible lease terms.’ Court practice William Balfour soon built up a substantial Court practice, which included preparing cases and then instructing Counsel to appear in the two Supreme Courts in Scotland, the Court of Session for civil cases and the High Court of Justiciary for criminal cases. As explained in the next paragraph, a major part of his business was to act as Edinburgh agent for out-of-town colleagues, who were known as his country correspondents. As all important cases, which in those days included all actions of 6 divorce, came to the Supreme Courts, Edinburgh firms built up a network of informal but meaningful relationships with firms throughout Scotland. Reported Cases Cases that have significance for the wider legal profession are reported (published) in volumes known as Session Cases for Court of Session civil actions, Justiciary Cases (for High Court criminal cases) and Scots Law Times for both of these and for Sheriff Court cases also. The reports end with the names of the solicitors involved. WestLaw has digitalized these, and a search for William Balfour brings up twenty-two Supreme Court cases while he practiced on his own between 1887 and assuming Peter Manson as a partner in 1904. Half of these were Inner House cases in the Court of Session, because (as an appeal Court) that is where important points of principle are decided and considered worth reporting.
Recommended publications
  • 2 Legal System of Scotland
    Legal System of 2 Scotland Yvonne McLaren and Josephine Bisacre This chapter discusses the formal sources of Scots law – answering the question of where the law gets its binding authority from. The chapter considers the role played by human rights in the Scottish legal system and their importance both for individuals and for businesses. While most com- mercial contracts are fulfilled and do not end up in court, some do, and sometimes businesses are sued for negligence, and they may also fall foul of the criminal law. Therefore the latter part of the chapter discusses the civil and criminal courts of Scotland and the personnel that work in the justice system. The Scottish legal system is also set in its UK and European context, and the chapter links closely with Chapters 3 and 4, where two rather dif- ferent legal systems – those in Dubai and Malaysia – are explored, in order to provide some international comparisons. The formal sources of Scots Law: from where does the law derive its authority? What is the law and why should we obey it? These are important ques- tions. Rules come in many different guises. There are legal rules and other rules that may appear similar in that they invoke a sense of obligation, such as religious rules, ethical or moral rules, and social rules. People live by religious or moral codes and consider themselves bound by them. People honour social engagements because personal relationships depend on this. However, legal rules are different in that the authority of the state is behind them and if they are not honoured, ultimately the state will step in 20 Commercial Law in a Global Context and enforce them, in the form of civil remedies such as damages, or state- sanctioned punishment for breach of the criminal law.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Parenting Plan 2016-19
    Corporate Parenting Plan 2016-2019 sportscotland 1 Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 4 Overview of sportscotland ..................................................................................... 4 Who we are ............................................................................................................ 4 Our organisation ..................................................................................................... 4 Our Vision, Mission and Values .............................................................................. 4 Equality at sportscotland ........................................................................................ 5 Context ....................................................................................................................... 6 What is a Corporate Parent? .................................................................................. 6 Corporate Parent responsibilities ............................................................................ 6 sportscotland’s approach to Corporate Parenting ..................................................... 8 Our Duties as a Corporate Parent .......................................................................... 8 Implementation ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • List of Approved Contractors
    1st Line Defence 83rd Cairneyhill Scouts A B & A Matthews A Fraser & Co A J Balfour Associates A J Glass & Glazing A P Contracts A S Wagner A.C White Solicitors A.F.A. Fire & Security A2i Transcription Services Aaen Peach Aareon UK Ltd Abbeymill Business Centre Aberdein Considine & Co ACAS Acco Brands Service Ace Brightwaste Ltd Ace Recycling Group ACS Physical Risk Control Ltd Act Now Training Action Lawn & Leisure Active Access Active Playground Management ADA Construction Consultants Ltd Adairs Adam Currie and Co Adam Legal LLP t/a Adam & Flowerdew Adams Law Solicitors Adaptocare Ltd Addleshaw Goddard Adept Telecom ADT Fire & Security Plc Advanced Secure Techologies AdviceUK AGM Roofing & Maintenance Aikman Bell Ailsa Building Contractors Ltd Ailsa TH Ltd Aird Geomatics Ltd Aitken Laboratories Akro Plant Ltd AKW Medi-care Ltd Alba Facilities Services Ltd Alba Forklift Training Alba Water Alex Hutcheon & Company Alex M. Adamson Alex Mitchell & Sons Alexander Jubb & Taylor Alexr. McAllister & McKechnie ALF Services Alison Dalziel All Cleaned Up Scotland All The Fours Allan Black & McCaskie Allied Surveyors Scotland Plc Allingham & Co Allpay Limited Almac Almond Cleaning Services Almond Housing Association Ltd Alphagraphics Altair Consultancy and Advisory Services AM Steel Solutions Amazon Anderson Bain Anderson Beaton Lamond Anderson Bell Christie Anderson Legal Ltd Anderson Shaw & Gilbert Anderson Strathern Andersons Andrew G Manderson & Co Andrew K Price Angel Springs Ltd TA Waterlogic UK Anglian Water Angus Biofuels Apogee Corporation
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Standards for Solicitor Advocates – Performance Indicators
    Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980 section 25A (http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1980/46) Rights of Audience in the Court of Session, the High Court of Justiciary, the Supreme Court and Judicial Committee of the Privy Council Statutory requirements: 1) Completion to the satisfaction of the Council of a course of training in evidence and pleading in relation to proceedings in the Courts to which rights of audience are sought 2) Has such knowledge as appears to the Council to be appropriate of (1) the practice and procedure of and (2) professional conduct in regard to those Courts 3) That the Council is satisfied that the applicant is, having regard among other things to the applicant’s experience in appropriate proceedings in the sheriff court, otherwise a fit and proper person to have a right of audience in those Courts Rules C4:1 Rights of Audience in the Civil Courts (http://www.lawscot.org.uk/rules- and-guidance/section-c-specialities/rule-c4-solicitor-advocates/rules/c41-rights-of- audience-in-the-civil-courts/), C4:2 Rights of Audience in the Criminal Courts (http://www.lawscot.org.uk/rules-and-guidance/section-c-specialities/rule-c4-solicitor- advocates/rules/c42-rights-of-audience-in-the-criminal-courts/), C4:3 Order of Precedence, Instructions (http://www.lawscot.org.uk/rules-and-guidance/section-c- specialities/rule-c4-solicitor-advocates/rules/c43-order-of-precedence,-instructions- and-representation/), and Representation and C4:4 Conduct of Solicitor Advocates (http://www.lawscot.org.uk/rules-and-guidance/section-c-specialities/rule-c4-solicitor- advocates/rules/c44-conduct-of-solicitor-advocates/) apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Fergus Whyte | Arnot Manderson Advocates
    [email protected] 07572 945 963 Year of Call FERGUS WHYTE 2020 Devil Masters Usman Tariq Ross McClelland Frances Connor @WhyteFergus on Twitter LinkedIn Profile Practice Profile Fergus is an experienced litigator with an interest in commercial and public law disputes, intellectual property, data protection and media law, trust law and alternative dispute resolution. He has considerable experience in courtroom advocacy as well as experience in conducting complex litigation, dealing with expert evidence and managing client relationships. Fergus transferred to the Scottish bar in June 2020 having previously been a barrister and solicitor in New Zealand (since 2012) and having completed an LLM at the University of Edinburgh and the Faculty of Advocates examinations in Scots Law. Since calling he has acted in a commercial matter in the Outer House as sole counsel as well as appearing as a junior in the Inner House, and conducted a number of proceedings before Sheriffs. He has also recently appeared as junior counsel in an arbitration under the Dubai International Arbitration Centre Rules relating to a construction dispute. He has a strong background in legal research and comparative law having acted as a judges' clerk (judicial assistant), in client and case management as a solicitor in a boutique litigation firm and as an advocate before the higher courts in New Zealand. He has worked in a number of legal roles in Scotland including as a researcher to the Edinburgh Tram Inquiry. Fergus is an associate member of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and a former coach of the University of Edinburgh Vis Moot Team.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Land Court and the Lands Tribunal for Scotland a Consultation on the Future of the Land Court and the Lands Tribunal
    The Scottish Land Court and the Lands Tribunal for Scotland A consultation on the future of the Land Court and the Lands Tribunal Scottish Land and Estates (SLE) is a member organisation representing the interests of Scottish landowners, farmers and estates. Our vision is for profitable land-based businesses able to contribute to resilient rural economies helping rural Scotland thrive. Our members, some of whom are practising solicitors, are interested in the legal process and system and are grateful for the professionalism of court and tribunal members and staff. Questions 1 Please indicate your views on the proposal to amalgamate the Scottish Land Court and the Lands Tribunal for Scotland. in favour not in favour Please give your reasons. SLE is not entirely opposed to the amalgamation proposal, but we do have some serious concerns should it go ahead. While we appreciate amalgamation may result in an administrative cost saving, any amalgamated body would still require to be adequately resourced and access to justice be at least as comparable as now. For instance, we would be opposed to increased costs for the parties involved. We would also impress the need to retain specialisms. It is important that the Land Court’s experience in crofting matters for instance is not lost by amalgamation. There is much professional knowledge in the court situation, and we would be keen to avoid any dilution of that. There has been a strong link between small landholding and crofting legislation and the Scottish Land Court over the past century. The retention of a specialist user friendly Court in this area remains important even though there is an increasing move to ADR options.
    [Show full text]
  • Foi-17-02802
    Annex B Deputy First Minister’s briefing for James Wolffe meeting on 3 March 2016: Meeting with James Wolffe QC, Dean of Faculty of Advocates 14:30, 3 March 2016 Key message Support efforts to improve the societal contribution made by the courts. In particular the contribution to growing the economy Who James Wolffe QC, Dean of Faculty of Advocates What Informal meeting, principally to listen to the Dean’s views and suggestions Where Parliament When Date Thursday 3 March 2016 Time 14:30 pm Supporting Private Office indicated no officials required officials Briefing and No formal agenda agenda Annex A: Background on Faculty and biography of Mr Wolffe Annex B: Key lines Annex C: Background issues Copy to: Cabinet Secretary for Justice Minister for Community Safety and Legal Affairs DG Learning and Justice DG Enterprise, Environment and Innovation Neil Rennick, Director Justice Jan Marshall [REDACTED] Nicola Wisdahl Cameron Stewart [REDACTED] John McFarlane, Special Adviser Communications Safer & Stronger St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh EH1 3DG www.scotland.gov.uk MEETING WITH JAMES WOLFFE QC ANNEX A Background The Faculty of Advocates is an independent body of lawyers who have been admitted to practise as Advocates before the Courts of Scotland. The Faculty has been in existence since 1532 when the College of Justice was set up by Act of the Scots Parliament, but its origins are believed to predate that event. It is self- regulating, and the Court delegates to the Faculty the task of preparing Intrants for admission as Advocates. This task involves a process of examination and practical instruction known as devilling, during which Intrants benefit from intensive structured training in the special skills of advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • 28415 NDR Credits
    28415 NDR Credits Billing Primary Liable party name Full Property Address Primary Liable Party Contact Add Outstanding Debt Period British Airways Plc - (5), Edinburgh Airport, Edinburgh, EH12 9DN Cbre Ltd, Henrietta House, Henrietta Place, London, W1G 0NB 2019 -5,292.00 Building 320, (54), Edinburgh Airport, Edinburgh, Building 319, World Cargo Centre, Manchester Airport, Manchester, Alpha Lsg Ltd 2017 -18,696.00 EH12 9DN M90 5EX Building 320, (54), Edinburgh Airport, Edinburgh, Building 319, World Cargo Centre, Manchester Airport, Manchester, Alpha Lsg Ltd 2018 -19,228.00 EH12 9DN M90 5EX Building 320, (54), Edinburgh Airport, Edinburgh, Building 319, World Cargo Centre, Manchester Airport, Manchester, Alpha Lsg Ltd 2019 -19,608.00 EH12 9DN M90 5EX The Maitland Social Club Per The 70a, Main Street, Kirkliston, EH29 9AB 70 Main Street, Kirkliston, West Lothian, EH29 9AB 2003 -9.00 Secretary/Treasurer 30, Old Liston Road, Newbridge, Midlothian, EH28 The Royal Bank Of Scotland Plc C/O Gva , Po Box 6079, Wolverhampton, WV1 9RA 2019 -519.00 8SS 194a, Lanark Road West, Currie, Midlothian, Martin Bone Associates Ltd (194a) Lanark Road West, Currie, Midlothian, EH14 5NX 2003 -25.20 EH14 5NX C/O Cbre - Corporate Outsourcing, 55 Temple Row, Birmingham, Lloyds Banking Group 564, Queensferry Road, Edinburgh, EH4 6AT 2019 -2,721.60 B2 5LS Unit 3, 38c, West Shore Road, Edinburgh, EH5 House Of Fraser (Stores) Ltd Granite House, 31 Stockwell Street, Glasgow, G1 4RZ 2008 -354.00 1QD Tsb Bank Plc 210, Boswall Parkway, Edinburgh, EH5 2LX C/O Cbre, 55 Temple
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland and the UK Constitution
    Scotland and the UK Constitution The 1998 devolution acts brought about the most significant change in the constitution of the United Kingdom since at least the passage of the 1972 European Communities Act. Under those statutes devolved legislatures and administrations were created in Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland. The documents below have been selected to give an overview of the constitutional settlement established by the devolution acts and by the Courts. Scotland has been chosen as a case study for this examination, both because the Scottish Parliament has been granted the most extensive range of powers and legislative competences of the three devolved areas, but also because the ongoing debate on Scottish independence means that the powers and competencies of the Scottish Parliament are very much live questions. The devolution of certain legislative and political powers to Scotland was effected by the Scotland Act 1998. That statute, enacted by the Westminster Parliament, creates the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Executive (now the “Scottish Government”), and establishes the limits on the Parliament’s legislative competence. Schedule 5 of the Act, interpolated by Section 30(1), lists those powers which are reserved to the Westminster Parliament, and delegates all other matters to the devolved organs. Thus, while constitutional matters, foreign affairs, and national defence are explicitly reserved to Westminster, all matters not listed— including the education system, the health service, the legal system, environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Ideas of Equity (Pdf)
    Ideas of Equity 00A_PoE_prelims.pmd 1 15/05/2017, 21:45 STUDIES IN SCOTS LAW Series Editor Kenneth G C Reid Editorial Board Alan R Barr Sandra M Eden George L Gretton Volumes in the series 1. Ross Gilbert Anderson, Assignation (2008) 2. Andrew J M Steven, Pledge and Lien (2008) 3. Craig Anderson, Possession of Corporeal Moveables (2015) 4. Jill Robbie, Private Water Rights (2015) 5. Daniel J Carr, Ideas of Equity (2017) 00A_PoE_prelims.pmd 2 15/05/2017, 21:45 STUDIES IN SCOTS LAW VOLUME 5 Ideas of Equity Daniel J Carr Lecturer in Private Law, University of Edinburgh Lecturer in Law, Robert Gordon University EDINBURGH LEGAL EDUCATION TRUST 2017 00A_PoE_prelims.pmd 3 15/05/2017, 21:45 Published by Edinburgh Legal Education Trust School of Law University of Edinburgh Old College South Bridge Edinburgh EH8 9YL http://www.centreforprivatelaw.ed.ac.uk/monograph_series First published 2017 © Daniel J Carr, 2017 The author asserts his moral rights. ISBN 978-0-9556332-9-4 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of the copyright owner. Applications for the copyright owner’s permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publisher. Typeset by Etica Press Ltd, Malvern Printed and bound by Martins the Printers, Berwick-upon-Tweed 00A_PoE_prelims.pmd 4 15/05/2017, 21:45 Contents Preface vii Table of Cases ix Table of Statutes xvii Abbreviations xix 1 Introduction 1 2 Historical Understandings of Equity 14 3 Unjustified Enrichment 53 4 Trusts 104 5 Constructive Trusts 134 6 Fiduciary Law 184 7 Conclusion 219 Index 219 v 00A_PoE_prelims.pmd 5 15/05/2017, 21:45 00A_PoE_prelims.pmd 6 15/05/2017, 21:45 Preface This book is an updated version of my doctoral thesis submitted in 2009, and awarded by the University of Cambridge in 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter October 2015
    Surveyors & valuers Newsletter October 2015 Contents “Under Corruption” – “Under Corruption” – Minimising your exposure to the risks of bribery and corruption within the construction Minimising your exposure industry Front page to the risks of bribery and RICS Lender v Valuer ADR Service Page 3 corruption within the Claims arising from property management Page 5 construction industry Know your limitations! Page 7 Simon Konsta, Partner, and May Ahmed, Associate Flood Re: an update In recent months, the media has been awash with headlines Page 9 that suggest that the UK, and the London property A view from Hong Kong of the market in particular, has become a safe haven for money surveyors and valuers’ market Page 11 launderers. Aside from the inevitable hyperbole, these Footnotes headlines carry an element of truth and, more importantly, Page 12 act as a cautionary reminder of the pervasive nature of corruption, particularly within the construction industry. In 2011, Transparency International’s Bribe Payers Index indicated that, out of the 19 different business sectors it surveyed across 28 of the world’s largest economies (including the UK), bribery was perceived to be most common in the public works contracts and construction sector. This perception of the construction industry remains and is not confined to jurisdictions that are seemingly more corrupt than the UK1. A report produced by the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) in September 2013 found that 49% of the 701 UK based construction professionals it surveyed considered that corruption was either extremely or fairly common within the UK construction industry. This sentiment was reinforced by a subsequent report published by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation & Development (OECD) in December 2014, which analysed 427 bribery enforcement actions across 17 countries (including the UK) between February 1999 and June 2014 and noted that almost two thirds of the cases occurred in just four sectors, with the construction industry ranking as the joint second most corrupt of those sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Law Firms 2019 Top Law Firms 2019
    Top Law Firms 2019 Top Law Firms 2019 In association with Sanlam Private Wealth In the hands of a wealthsmith, a humdrum retirement could turn into something more adventurous At Sanlam we understand the importance of ensuring each client’s pension reaches its maximum potential, providing them with the best foundations to enjoy their next chapter. To find out more please call Penny Lovell on 020 7382 0946, email [email protected] or visit www.sanlam.co.uk Advice • Planning • Management Winner Investment Performance High Growth Portfolios 2018 and 2019 The value of investments and the income from them can fall and you may get back less than you invested. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Sanlam Wealth is a trading name of Sanlam Private Investments (UK) Ltd which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England and Wales No.2041819. Registered Office: 16 South Park, Sevenoaks, Kent TN13 1AN. Sanlam Wealth Planning UK Limited, registered in England and Wales 3879955, and English Mutual Limited, registered in England and Wales 6685913 (Registered Offices: St Bartholomew’s House, Lewin’s Mead, Bristol BS1 2NH). English Mutual Limited is an appointed representative of Sanlam Wealth Planning UK Limited. Top Law Firms Foreword Will Sidery elcome to the 2019 eprivateclient Top Law Firms report that recognises the leading private client editor eprivateclient W law firms in the UK. This year 43 firms have been included in the rankings and these firms reflect the wide variety of advice available to clients from not just the UK but international individuals and families too.
    [Show full text]