DOCSLIB.ORG

Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use: a Practical Guide to Common Clinical Challenges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use: a Practical Guide to Common Clinical Challenges Journal of the American Heart Association CONTEMPORARY REVIEW Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use: A Practical Guide to Common Clinical Challenges Ashley Chen, PharmD; Eric Stecker, MD, MPH; Bruce A. Warden , PharmD, BCPS-AQ Cardiology, CLS ABSTRACT: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have quickly become attractive alternatives to the long- standing standard of care in anticoagulation, vitamin K antagonist. DOACs are indicated for prevention and treatment of several cardiovascular con- ditions. Since the first approval in 2010, DOACs have emerged as leading therapeutic alternatives that provide both clinicians and patients with more effective, safe, and convenient treatment options in thromboembolic settings. With the expanding role of DOACs, clinicians are faced with increasingly complex decisions relating to appropriate agent, duration of treatment, and use in special populations. This review will provide an overview of DOACs and act as a practical reference for clinicians to optimize DOAC use among common challenging scenarios. Topics addressed include (1) appropriate indications; (2) use in patients with specific comorbidities; (3) monitoring parameters; (4) transitioning between anticoagulant regimens; (5) major drug interactions; and (6) cost considerations. Key Words: anticoagulation ■ oral direct thrombin inhibitor ■ oral factor Xa inhibitors ■ pharmacotherapy irect oral anticoagulants (DOACs)—dabigatran those for warfarin by 2013, with apixaban being the most (Pradaxa), rivaroxaban (Xarelto), apixaban (Eliquis), frequently prescribed DOAC for patients with nonvalvular Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on June 23, 2020 Dedoxaban (Savaysa), and betrixaban (Bevyxxa) are atrial fibrillation (NVAF).7 anticoagulation pharmacotherapy used for the preven- Over the past decade, DOACs have been the sub- tion of thrombosis in several cardiovascular contexts.1 ject of extensive investigation in many clinical scenarios. DOACs are categorized into 2 main classes: oral direct Though guidelines and review articles have provided factor Xa inhibitors (ie, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, detailed and in- depth analyses of the immense literature and betrixaban) and direct thrombin inhibitors (ie, dab- base, these can be too cumbersome and challenging igatran). In 2010, the US Food and Drug Administration to integrate into everyday clinical use. The purpose of (FDA) approved its first DOAC, dabigatran, followed by this review is to be a practical reference or algorithm for rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban in the the busy clinician to navigate key aspects of effective following years. DOACs are relatively new agents demon- DOAC prescribing, with an emphasis on addressing strating superiority or noninferiority to prior standards of key situations where clinical uncertainty exists. This re- care, anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA; ie, view will provide recommendations to address special warfarin), or low- molecular- weight heparins (LMWHs), in clinical situations to include indications, use in specific reducing risk of thromboembolic complications with sim- comorbidities, monitoring parameters, transitioning to ilar or reduced bleeding risk.2–5 Advantages of DOACs or off of therapy, drug interactions, and cost. compared with VKAs include fewer monitoring require- ments, less frequent follow- up, more immediate drug onset and offset effects (important for periprocedural and INDICATIONS FOR USE acute bleeding management), and fewer drug and food In general, FDA- approved indications for each of the interactions.6 As a result, DOAC prescriptions exceeded DOACs are comparable (see Table 1). Dabigatran, Correspondence to: Bruce A. Warden, PharmD, BCPS-AQ Cardiology, CLS, FNLA, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code HRC5N, Portland, OR 97239. E-mail: [email protected] Current address: Ashley Chen, PharmD, St. Joseph Medical Center, Tacoma, WA. For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 15. © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. JAHA is available at: www.ahajournals.org/journal/jaha J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e017559. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017559 1 Chen et al Practical Guide to DOAC Use added; however, trade- offs regarding thrombosis are Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms not as clear cut.15 Recent investigations shed light on this common AF atrial fibrillation clinical scenario. The PIONEER AF- PCI (Prevention of ASCVD atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing CAD coronary artery disease PCI) trial revealed that dual therapy with rivaroxaban CKD chronic kidney disease dosed at nonstandardized AF dosing (15 mg daily, or CrCl creatinine clearance 10 mg daily if renal impairment) and a P2Y12 inhibitor (predominantly clopidogrel) or triple therapy with rivar- CYP cytochrome P450 oxaban 2.5 mg twice daily plus DAPT was associated DAPT dual-antiplatelet therapy with lower bleeding risk in comparison to triple therapy DOAC direct oral anticoagulant (VKA at standard AF dosing, aspirin, and clopidogrel; FDA US Food and Drug Administration hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47–0.76) but similar HR hazard ratio thrombotic events.16 The RE- DUAL PCI (Randomized INR international normalized ratio Evaluation of Dual Antithrombotic Therapy with LMWH low molecular weight heparin Dabigatran Versus Triple Therapy With Warfarin in NVAF nonvalvular atrial fibrillation Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing PCI percutaneous coronary intervention Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) trial showed that VKA vitamin K antagonists dual therapy with dabigatran (110 and 150 mg twice- VTE venous thromboembolism daily regimens) and a P2Y12 inhibitor (predominantly clopidogrel) revealed similar results, demonstrating a lower risk of bleeding and hospitalization compared with triple therapy (VKA dose adjusted to an interna- rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban are approved for tional normalized ratio [INR] of 2–3, aspirin, clopido- the lowering the risk of stroke and embolism in NVAF as grel). The magnitude of difference in bleeding events well as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism was dose dependent (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.42–0.63; treatment/prophylaxis.8–11 Unique indications include and HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.58–0.88 for the dabigatran betrixaban for prophylaxis of venous thromboembo- 110 and 150 mg regimens, respectively). At the same Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on June 23, 2020 lism (VTE) in hospitalized patients for an acute medi- time, dabigatran at both doses was noninferior with cal illness, and rivaroxaban in combination with aspirin respect to the prevention of ischemic event rates.17 to reduce major cardiovascular events in patients with The AUGUSTUS (Antithrombotic Therapy After Acute chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral Coronary Syndrome or PCI in Atrial Fibrillation) trial di- artery disease.9,12 However, there is still uncertainty in rectly examined the benefit and risk of dropping aspirin understanding safe and effective use of DOACs in the with both warfarin and apixaban in combination with setting of patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, a P2Y inhibitor (clopidogrel). The AUGUSTUS trial specifically atrial fibrillation (AF) with recent percutane- 12 keenly addressed a key missing component to the lit- ous coronary intervention (PCI), AF with concomitant erature and criticisms of RE- DUAL PCI and PIONEER artificial heart valves, stable atherosclerotic cardiovas- AF- PCI trials by comparing triple therapy to triple ther- cular disease (ASCVD), and cancer- associated throm- apy and dual therapy to dual therapy. The trial demon- boembolism. This section aims to clarify the use of strated the antithrombotic regimens that included DOACs within these patient subgroups. apixaban in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor (without aspirin) resulted in less bleeding (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, AF and PCI 0.58–0.81) and fewer hospitalizations (HR, 0.83; 95% The combination of AF and CAD has often led to con- CI, 0.74–0.93) without significantly effecting the num- fusion regarding the optimal antithrombotic strategy, ber of ischemic events than regimens that included a historically favoring atherothrombotic prevention to VKA, aspirin, or both.18 Clinicians should be confident bleeding complications. Patients with CAD undergo- that dropping aspirin according to clinical trial proto- ing PCI are to receive dual- antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cols when using apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban consisting of aspirin and a P2Y inhibitor (ie, clopi- 12 in combination with a P2Y12 inhibitor will substantially dogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) for prevention of re- lower bleeding risk without increasing thrombotic risk, current atherosclerosis and stent thrombosis.13 When a sentiment endorsed by recent consensus docu- this occurs in patients with comorbid AF, the poten- ments.14,19 When it comes to antithrombotic therapy in tial need for triple antithrombotic therapy consisting of this scenario, less may be more. DAPT and anticoagulation (historically VKA) arises.14 Another important consideration is the use of As several studies have shown, bleeding risk rises sig- add- on therapy to further mitigate bleeding risk, spe- nificantly with each
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Extended-Duration Betrixaban Versus Shorter-Duration Enoxaparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Medical
    Intensive Care Med (2019) 45:477–487 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05565-6 ORIGINAL Extended-duration betrixaban versus shorter-duration enoxaparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in critically ill medical patients: an APEX trial substudy Gerald Chi1* , C. Michael Gibson2, Arzu Kalayci1, Alexander T. Cohen3, Adrian F. Hernandez4, Russell D. Hull5, Farima Kahe1, Mehrian Jafarizade1, Sadaf Sharfaei1, Yuyin Liu6, Robert A. Harrington7 and Samuel Z. Goldhaber8 © 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature Abstract Purpose: To assess the efcacy and safety of betrixaban for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among criti- cally ill patients. Methods: The APEX trial randomized 7513 acutely ill hospitalized patients to betrixaban for 35–42 days or enoxa- parin for 10 4 days. Among those, 703 critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit were included in the analysis, and± 547 patients who had no severe renal insufciency or P-glycoprotein inhibitor use were included in the full-dose stratum. The risk of VTE, bleeding, net clinical beneft (composite of VTE and major bleeding), and mortality was compared at 35–42 days and at 77 days. Results: At 35–42 days, extended betrixaban reduced the risk of VTE (4.27% vs 7.95%, P 0.042) without causing excess major bleeding (1.14% vs 3.13%, P 0.07). Both VTE (3.32% vs 8.33%, P 0.013) and= major bleeding (0.00% vs 3.26%, P 0.003) were decreased in the full-dose= stratum. Patients who received= betrixaban had more non-major bleeding= than enoxaparin (overall population: 2.56% vs 0.28%, P 0.011; full-dose stratum: 3.32% vs 0.36%, P 0.010).
    [Show full text]
  • Standard-Dose Apixaban After Very Low-Dose Thrombolysis for Acute Intermediate-High Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism
    SAFE-LYSE | STUDY PROTOCOL Standard-dose Apixaban AFtEr Very Low-dose ThromboLYSis Title: for Acute Intermediate-high Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism Short Title: SAFE-LYSE Protocol Version: Issue Date: 28/AUG/2019 Principal Victor Tapson1,2, Aaron Weinberg1,2 Investigators: Sub Investigators: Sam Torbati1, Susan Jackman1, Niree Hindoyan1, Joseph Meza1 1Cedars-Sinai Medical Center 8700 Beverly Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90048 Affiliations: 2Cedars-Sinai Medical GrouP 200 N. Robertson Blvd. Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Victor TaPson 8730 Alden Drive, W155 Primary Contact: Los Angeles, CA 90048 (919) 971-6441 Investigator-Initiated Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMS) Study Funded By: Version 8.0 | Date: 28Aug2019 1 SAFE-LYSE | STUDY PROTOCOL STUDY SYNOPSIS Funding Provided by BMS/Pfizer Alliance Standard-dose Apixaban AFtEr Very Low-dose ThromboLYSis for Protocol Title Acute Intermediate-high Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism (SAFE-LYSE) Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major cause of mortality in the United States, with an estimated 100,000 deaths annually and uP to 30% of Patients dying within the first month of diagnosis. Recent guidelines now risk-stratify intermediate-risk PE Patients to intermediate-low and intermediate-high risk categories, but consensus on treatment for those Patients are controversial, as compared to that of high or low-risk Patients. Because of an increased risk of major, non-major, and intracranial bleeding and an uncertain effect on survival and Post-thrombotic complications, thrombolysis is not routinely recommended in the guidelines for intermediate- risk Patients. However, studies have evaluated half-dose (50 mg dose) tissue Plasminogen activator (tPA) and this aPPears to be effective for treating PE with a reduced yet still significant risk of bleeding.
    [Show full text]
  • FDA Approves ZONTIVITY™ (Vorapaxar), First-In-Class PAR-1
    NEWS RELEASE FDA Approves ZONTIVITY™ (vorapaxar), First-in-Class PAR-1 Antagonist, for the Reduction of Thrombotic Cardiovascular Events in Patients with a History of Heart Attack or with Peripheral Arterial Disease 5/12/2014 ZONTIVITY Added to Standard of Care Demonstrated Long-Term Benet Through Three Years Merck (NYSE:MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved ZONTIVITY™ (vorapaxar) for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with a history of heart attack (myocardial infarction) or in patients with narrowing of leg arteries, called peripheral arterial disease (PAD). For patients with a history of heart attack or with PAD who had no history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), ZONTIVITY added to standard of care produced a signicant 17 percent relative risk reduction over the three years of the study for the combined events of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and urgent coronary revascularization (UCR) [event rate 10.1 percent vs. 11.8 percent for placebo]. For the key secondary composite ecacy endpoint of CV death, MI and stroke alone, ZONTIVITY produced a signicant 20 percent relative risk reduction in these patients [7.9 percent vs. 9.5 percent for placebo]. These results were driven by an 18 percent relative risk reduction in MI [5.4 percent vs. 6.4 percent for placebo] and a 33 percent relative risk reduction in rst stroke [1.2 percent vs. 1.6 percent for placebo]. The prescribing information for ZONTIVITY includes a boxed warning regarding bleeding risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Zontivity (Vorapaxar)
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION antiplatelet drugs or with ZONTIVITY as the only antiplatelet These highlights do not include all the information needed to use agent. (2.2) ZONTIVITY safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for ZONTIVITY. --------------------- DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS --------------------- Tablets: 2.08 mg vorapaxar. (3) ZONTIVITY™ (vorapaxar) Tablets 2.08 mg*, for oral use *Equivalent to 2.5 mg vorapaxar sulfate ------------------------------- CONTRAINDICATIONS ------------------------------- Initial U.S. Approval: 2014 History of stroke, TIA, or ICH. (4.1) Active pathologic bleeding. (4.2) WARNING: BLEEDING RISK See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. ----------------------- WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS ----------------------- • Do not use ZONTIVITY in patients with a history of stroke, Like other antiplatelet agents, ZONTIVITY increases the risk of transient ischemic attack (TIA), or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH); bleeding. (5.1) or active pathological bleeding. (4.1, 4.2) Avoid use with strong CYP3A inhibitors or inducers. (5.2) • Antiplatelet agents, including ZONTIVITY, increase the risk of bleeding, including ICH and fatal bleeding. (5.1) ------------------------------ ADVERSE REACTIONS ------------------------------ Bleeding, including life-threatening and fatal bleeding, is the most ----------------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE ---------------------------- commonly reported adverse reaction. (6.1) ZONTIVITY is a protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) antagonist indicated for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Merck patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or with peripheral Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., at 1-877­ arterial disease (PAD). ZONTIVITY has been shown to reduce the rate 888-4231 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch. of a combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, and urgent coronary revascularization.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (Doacs)
    biomedicines Review Laboratory Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Claire Dunois HYPHEN BioMed, Sysmex Group, 95000 Neuville sur Oise, France; [email protected] Abstract: The introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban, provides safe and effective alternative to previous anticoagulant therapies. DOACs directly, selectively, and reversibly inhibit factors IIa or Xa. The coagulation effect follows the plasma concentration–time profile of the respective anticoagulant. The short half-life of a DOAC constrains the daily oral intake. Because DOACs have predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses at a fixed dose, they do not require monitoring. However in specific clinical situations and for particular patient populations, testing may be helpful for patient management. The effect of DOACs on the screening coagulation assays such as prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and thrombin time (TT) is directly linked to reagent composition, and clotting time can be different from reagent to reagent, depending on the DOAC’s reagent sensitivity. Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is considered the gold standard method for DOAC measurement, but it is time consuming and requires expensive equipment. The general consensus for the assessment of a DOAC is clotting or chromogenic assays using specific standard calibrators and controls. This review provides a short summary of DOAC properties and an update on laboratory methods for measuring DOACs. Keywords: DOAC; monitoring; screening assays; quantitative assays Citation: Dunois, C. Laboratory Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs). 1. Introduction Biomedicines 2021, 9, 445. https:// Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) constitute first-line therapy used for many throm- doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9050445 boembolic indications, such as prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Transition of Anticoagulants 2019
    Transition of Anticoagulants 2019 Van Hellerslia, PharmD, BCPS, CACP, Brand Generic Clinical Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice, Angiomax bivalirudin Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, PA Arixtra fondaparinux Bevyxxa betrixaban Pallav Mehta, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Coumadin warfarin Division of Hematology/Oncology, Eliquis apixaban MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Camden, NJ Fragmin dalteparin Lovenox enoxaparin Reviewer: Kelly Rudd, PharmD, BCPS, CACP, Pradaxa dabigatran Clinical Specialist, Anticoagulation, Bassett Medical Center, Savaysa edoxaban Cooperstown, NY Xarelto rivaroxaban From To Action Apixaban Argatroban/ Wait 12 hours after last dose of apixaban to initiate parenteral anticoagulant. In cases of Bivalirudin/ high bleeding risk, consider omitting initial bolus when transitioning to heparin infusion. Enoxaparin/ Dalteparin/ Fondaparinux/ Heparin Apixaban Warfarin When going from apixaban to warfarin, consider the use of parenteral anticoagulation as a bridge (eg, start heparin infusion or therapeutic enoxaparin AND warfarin 12 hours after last dose of apixaban and discontinue parenteral anticoagulant when INR is therapeutic). Apixaban affects INR so that initial INR measurements during the transition may not be useful for determining the appropriate dose of warfarin. Apixaban Betrixaban, Wait 12 hours from last dose of apixaban to initiate betrixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or Dabigatran, rivaroxaban. Edoxaban, or Rivaroxaban Argatroban Apixaban, Start apixaban, betrixaban, dabigatran,
    [Show full text]
  • Annexes to the Annual Report of the European Medicines Agency 2014
    Annexes to the annual report of the European Medicines Agency 2014 Table of contents Annex 1 – Members of the Management Board ............................................................................. 2 Annex 2 – Members of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use ................................... 4 Annex 3 – Members of the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee ...................................... 6 Annex 4 – Members of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use ............................... 8 Annex 5 – Members of the Committee on Orphan Medicinal Products ............................................ 10 Annex 6 – Members of the Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products .............................................. 12 Annex 07 – Committee for Advanced Therapies .......................................................................... 14 Annex 8 – Members of the Paediatric Committee ........................................................................ 16 Annex 9 – Working parties and working groups .......................................................................... 18 Annex 10 – CHMP opinions in 2014 on medicinal products for human use ...................................... 22 Annex 11 – CVMP opinions in 2014 on medicinal products for veterinary use .................................. 36 Annex 12 – COMP opinions in 2014 on designation of orphan medicinal products ............................ 41 Annex 13 – HMPC European Union herbal monographs in 2014....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Prior Stroke
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Prior Stroke Elisa Bellettini and Leonardo De Luca * Department of Cardiosciences, U.O.C. of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, 00152 Roma, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +39-06-58704419; Fax: +39-06-5870-4361 Abstract: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and prior cerebrovascular events (CVE) are frequently faced in clinical practice and present a high rate of both ischemic and bleeding events. For these reasons, the antithrombotic management is particularly challenging in this subgroup of patients. Recent trials suggest that, although a potent antiplatelet strategy is safe in the acute phases of myocardial ischemia for these patients, the risk of major bleeding complications, including intracranial hemorrhage, is extremely high when the antithrombotic therapy is prolonged for a long period of time. Therefore, especially in patients with chronic CAD and history of CVE, the antithrombotic management should be carefully balanced between ischemic and bleeding risks. The present review is aimed at critically evaluating the available evidence to help make these crucial clinical decisions regarding the better antithrombotic therapy to use in this high-risk subgroup Citation: Bellettini, E.; De Luca, L. of patients. Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Prior Stroke. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, Keywords: antithrombotic therapy; clopidogrel; ticagrelor; prasugrel; aspirin; rivaroxaban; acute 1923. https://doi.org/10.3390/ coronary syndromes; prior stroke jcm10091923 Academic Editors: Wolfgang Dichtl and Andrzej Surdacki 1. Introduction Patients with ischemic stroke present a 4-fold increased risk for coronary artery disease Received: 28 February 2021 (CAD) compared to patients without cerebrovascular diseases (CVD) [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub . No . : US 2019 / 0192440 A1
    US 20190192440A1 (19 ) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2019 /0192440 A1 LI (43 ) Pub . Date : Jun . 27 , 2019 ( 54 ) ORAL DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPRISING Publication Classification DRUG IN THE FORM OF NANOPARTICLES (51 ) Int . CI. A61K 9 / 20 (2006 .01 ) ( 71 ) Applicant: Triastek , Inc. , Nanjing ( CN ) A61K 9 /00 ( 2006 . 01) A61K 31/ 192 ( 2006 .01 ) (72 ) Inventor : Xiaoling LI , Dublin , CA (US ) A61K 9 / 24 ( 2006 .01 ) ( 52 ) U . S . CI. ( 21 ) Appl. No. : 16 /289 ,499 CPC . .. .. A61K 9 /2031 (2013 . 01 ) ; A61K 9 /0065 ( 22 ) Filed : Feb . 28 , 2019 (2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 / 209 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 /2027 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31/ 192 ( 2013. 01 ) ; Related U . S . Application Data A61K 9 /2072 ( 2013 .01 ) (63 ) Continuation of application No. 16 /028 ,305 , filed on Jul. 5 , 2018 , now Pat . No . 10 , 258 ,575 , which is a (57 ) ABSTRACT continuation of application No . 15 / 173 ,596 , filed on The present disclosure provides a stable solid pharmaceuti Jun . 3 , 2016 . cal dosage form for oral administration . The dosage form (60 ) Provisional application No . 62 /313 ,092 , filed on Mar. includes a substrate that forms at least one compartment and 24 , 2016 , provisional application No . 62 / 296 , 087 , a drug content loaded into the compartment. The dosage filed on Feb . 17 , 2016 , provisional application No . form is so designed that the active pharmaceutical ingredient 62 / 170, 645 , filed on Jun . 3 , 2015 . of the drug content is released in a controlled manner. Patent Application Publication Jun . 27 , 2019 Sheet 1 of 20 US 2019 /0192440 A1 FIG .
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Management of Venous Thromboembolism Taylor Steuber, Pharmd, BCPS
    REPORT The Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Management of Venous Thromboembolism Taylor Steuber, PharmD, BCPS enous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein ABSTRACT thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), occurs in as many as 900,00 people in the United States each Appropriate treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is critical to year, with up to 100,000 Americans dying as a result.1 A minimizing long-term morbidity and mortality. The emergence of direct Vcommon complication, VTE is the most preventable cause of death oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has provided clinicians with expanded in hospitalized patients.2 Once VTE occurs, long-term mortality therapeutic options for patients with VTE, and as a result, updated practice guidelines released by the American College of Chest Physicians is poor, with 25% of patients not surviving 7 days and nearly 40% favor DOACs over traditional anticoagulants, such as warfarin. The newest 3 not surviving the first year. Furthermore, PE with or without DVT DOAC, betrixaban, received FDA approval in 2017, with an indication has been found to be an independent predictor of reduced survival for VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized adults. Additionally, results from the compared with DVT alone.3 Among those who do survive, 30% will XALIA study on the real-world outcomes of rivaroxaban are now available. experience a recurrence of VTE within 10 years.4 A reversal agent for dabigatran, idarucizumab, also received FDA approval in 2017, and other reversal agents are in development. This article Historically, the pathogenesis of VTE has been explained with will provide an overview of current VTE treatment strategies, with an the 3 components of Virchow’s triad: hypercoagulability, hemody- emphasis on the place in therapy of the DOACs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cholesterol-Rich Microdomains Contribute to PAR1 Signaling in Platelets Despite a Weak Localization of the Receptor in These Microdomains
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Cholesterol-Rich Microdomains Contribute to PAR1 Signaling in Platelets Despite a Weak Localization of the Receptor in These Microdomains Vahideh Rabani 1, Jennifer Lagoutte-Renosi 1,2 , Jennifer Series 3, Benoit Valot 4, Jean-Marie Xuereb 3 and Siamak Davani 1,2,* 1 EA 3920 Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-25000 Besancon, France; [email protected] (V.R.); [email protected] (J.L.-R.) 2 Laboratoire de Pharmacologie Clinique et Toxicologie-CHU de Besançon, F-25000 Besancon, France 3 Inserm UMR1048, Institut des Maladies Métaboliques et Cardiovasculaires (I2MC), F-31100 Toulouse, France; [email protected] (J.S.); [email protected] (J.-M.X.) 4 UMR CNRS 6249 Chrono-Environnement, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-25000 Besancon, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-3-81-66-80-55 Received: 28 September 2020; Accepted: 27 October 2020; Published: 29 October 2020 Abstract: Platelet protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) is a cell surface G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that acts as a thrombin receptor promoting platelet aggregation. Targeting the PAR1 pathway by vorapaxar, a PAR1 antagonist, leads to a reduction in ischemic events in cardiovascular patients with a history of myocardial infarction or with peripheral arterial disease. In platelets, specialized microdomains highly enriched in cholesterol act as modulators of the activity of several GPCRs and play a pivotal role in the signaling pathway. However, their involvement in platelet PAR1 function remains incompletely characterized. In this context, we aimed to investigate whether activation of PAR1 in human platelets requires its localization in the membrane cholesterol-rich microdomains.
    [Show full text]
  • 204886Orig1s000
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 204886Orig1s000 MEDICAL REVIEW(S) DIVISION OF CARDIOVASCULAR & RENAL PRODUCTS Divisional Memo NDA: 204886 Zontivity; vorapaxar for reduction of atherothrombotic events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction. Sponsor: Merck Review date: 25 April 2014 Reviewer: N. Stockbridge, M.D., Ph.D., HFD-110 Distribution: NDA 204886 This memo conveys the Division’s recommendation to approve this application. This application has been the subject of reviews of CMC (Wong; 9 January 2014), biopharmaceutics (Eradiri; 9 January 2014), pharmacology/toxicology (Harlow; 17 December 2013, 19 February 2014), clinical pharmacology (Hariharan, Bilal, and Li; 16 December 2013), clinical (Rose and Levine; 16 December 2013, 18 April 2014) and statistics (Chen; 13 December 2013). There is a comprehensive CDTL memo (Marciniak; 18 April 2014) with which I am in general agreement. I highlight a few matters here. Vorapaxar is a low molecular weight blocker of PAR-1. On platelets, PAR-1 mediates platelet activation by thrombin, the hexapeptide TRAP, and possibly other short peptides. PAR-1 receptors exist in many other places, although vorapaxar’s effects seem only to be important at the platelet. Although inhibition of PAR-1 is reversible, the half-life of the drug in circulation is longer even than the life of platelets. There are no pending CMC issues. Vorapaxar has 7 chiral centers (b) (4) a single isomer that apparently does not undergo racemization. Crystalline vorapaxar tends to assume an amorphous form upon storage, but these forms are both highly soluble. Manufacturing site inspections are complete. Release specifications have been negotiated.
    [Show full text]