DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 4 -- Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 4 -- Bibliography -MENDOCINO COUNTY COASTAL ELEMENT - APPENDIX 4 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY B-D, NE Blayney-Dyett, "Natural Environment," November 1979. B-D, SA Blayney-Dyett, "Shoreline Access," December 1979. B-D, EPD Blayney-Dyett, "Existing and Potential Development," January 1980. B-D, OC Blayney-Dyett, "Options Considered, Sketch Plan Proposals," April 1980. 1. American Geological Institute, Glossary of Geologic Terms , 1972. 2. Barrett, James R., Mores Associates, Draft EIR for Irish Beach Unit No. 9 , Manchester, California, September, 1976. An Environmental Impact Report concerning a residential development, extension of an agricultural preserve, and recreational use. 3. The "Big River" Citizens Advisory Committee, The Mendocino Town Plan , April 22, 1980. Proposed Land Use Classifications for town of Mendocino based upon meetings, questionnaire, and letters from local residents. 4. Boyle, M.W., The Stratigraphy, Sedimentation and Structure of an Area near Point Arena, California , unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of California, 1967. 5. Brown, R.D., Jr., and E.W. Wolfe, Map showing recently active breaks along the San Andreas fault between Point Delgada and Bolinas Bay, California: U.S. Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Geologic Investigations Map 1-692, scale 1:24,000, 1972. 6. Brown, S., M.M. Brinson, and A.E. Lugo, "Structure and Function of Riparian Wetlands," U.S. Forest Service, Strategies for Protection and Management of Floodplain Wetlands and Other Riparian Ecosystems ; symposium proceedings, Callaway Gardens, Georgia, 11-13 December 1978. 7. California Coastal Commission, Commission Actions , undated. A collection of precedential permit and appeal cases pertaining to coastal issues in general and specifically within the Mendocino Coastal Zone boundary. 8. California Coastal Commission, Smith & Williams, Design Guidelines for the Special Coastal Community of Mendocino , South Pasadena, April 28, 1976. Evaluates no-growth, controlled growth, and uncontrolled growth. Describes types of organizations which would buy land as a public trust. Town edges described. 9. California Coastal Commission, Designation of Coastal Zone Areas Where Construction of an Electric Power Plant Would Prevent Achievement of the Objectives of the California Coastal Act of 1976 , 1978. 10. California Coastal Commission, Draft Memo on Agricultural Policies , 1978. Staff memo on Coastal Act policies on agriculture and framework for draft Exclusive Agricultural Zone provisions. -MENDOCINO COUNTY COASTAL ELEMENT - 11. California Coastal Commission, Energy Element – Findings and Policies (Draft) , May 1974. Draft findings and proposed policies for all aspects of energy question – electricity supply and demand, tanker facilities, alternative energy sources (nuclear, geothermal), conservation, etc. 12. California Coastal Commission, First Draft of Model Ordinances , California Coastal Commission, 1978. Staff memorandum containing first drafts of model ordinances dealing with: o Steep slope and watershed protection. o Agricultural zoning. o Coastal shoreline development overlay zone. 13. California Coastal Commission, Ground Water and Quality Conditions in Inglenook Fen Watershed , 1979. Memo taken from report by State Department of Water Resources. 14. California Coastal Commission, by DeLeuw, Cather & Company, Highway 1 Capacity Study: Final Report , December 1979. 15. California Coastal Commission, Local Coastal Program Manual , July 22, 1977, Supplemented September 30, 1977, updated July 25, 1979. Assistance for local governments preparing LCPs to meet regulations of the Coastal Commission. Discusses relationship of LCPs to overall planning, sources of funds. 16. California Coastal Commission, Local Coastal Program Regulations , May 17, 1977, revised February 1, 1980. Procedures for preparation, submission, approval, appeal, certification, and amendment of any local coastal program. Methodology to prepare and determine scope of LCPs o Schedule to process LCPs. o Recommended uses of more than local importance that should be considered in preparing LCPs. 17. California Coastal Commission, Planning for an Eroding Shoreline , 1978. 18. California Coastal Commission, Public Hearing Draft of Interpretive Guidelines for Coastal Planning and Permits , February 11, 1977. Statewide and localized guidelines for permit applications. 19. California Coastal Commission, by J.E. Bodovitz, Public hearing on draft proposal for forestry special treatment areas , memo, 1977. 20. California Coastal Commission, Staff Recommendation on Designation of Coastal Areas Where Power Plants Would be Inconsistent With Coastal Act Policies , December 1977. -MENDOCINO COUNTY COASTAL ELEMENT - Attempts to balance need for plants with preserving resources, with greater emphasis on compact, contiguous development vs. a specific wildlife habitat area. 21. California Coastal Commission, by Michael Fisher, Staff Recommendations of Revisions to the Commission Designation of Coastal Areas Where Power Plants Would be Inconsistent with Coastal Act Objectives , June 1979. 22. California Coastal Commission, Statewide Interpretive Guidelines , 1979 and 1980. State guidelines on access, condominium and stock cooperative conversions, draft wetlands interpretive guidelines, blufftop development, public trust, siting new development. 23. California Coastal Commission and the California State Coastal Conservancy, Coastal Access: Standards and Recommendations , 1980. 24. California Coastal Commission and Mendocino County Department of Health, by Steve Howe, Unpublished raw data on water wells for Mendocino Ground Water Study, in progress, 1979. 25. California Coastal Conservancy, by Del Davis Associates, Draft Environmental Impact Report: Proposed Whiskey Shoals Restoration Project, March 1979. Environmental Impact Report on redesign of a residential subdivision south of Point Arena. Impact assessment includes coastal zone data. 26. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission, California Coastal Plan , 1975. 27. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission, North Coast Region. California Coastal Plan: Preliminary Implementation: Russian Gulch, Stillwell Point, Mendocino County , 1976. Coastal development, appearance, land environment, marine environment; public access, transportation, coastal resources, energy, education and recreation in area. 28. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission, by Sage and Sage. Identification of Seismic Related Hazards in the Coastal Zone , 1977. 29. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission, by Sage and Sage. Identification of Seismic Related Hazards in the Coastal Zone, Addendum , 1978. 30. California Native Plant Society, Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California , 1974. 31. California Natural Areas Coordinating Council, Inventory of California Natural Areas , 1977. 32. California State Board of Forestry, Report of the Board of Forestry to the Water Resources Control Board , June 11, 1980. Identification of silviculturally-related nonpoint sources of water pollution with procedures and methods to control, to the extent feasible, such sources. 33. California State Department of Conservation, Division of Forestry, A Fire Hazard Security Classification System for California Wildlands , April 1973. -MENDOCINO COUNTY COASTAL ELEMENT - Discussion of criteria for identifying fire hazard ares, the fire hazard classification system, and recommendations for land use policy. 34. California State Department of Coonservation, Division of Forestry, Alquist Priolo Special Studies Zones Maps , 1972. 35. California State Department of Conservation, Division of Forestry, Geologic Map of California, Santa Rosa Sheet, 1963. 36. California State Department of Conservation, Division of Forestry, Legends and Supplemental Information to Accompany Vegetation—Soil Maps of California , August 1951. 37. California State Department of Conservation, Division of Forestry, Wildland Soils and Associated Vegetation of Mendocino County, California , 1963-64. Results of extensive 1947-50 soil survey. Since study, logging and fire have changed vegetation patterns, but extent of change is unknown. Technical soil survey. 38. California State Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, by J.W. Williams and T.L. Bedrossian, "Coastal Zone Geology Near Gualala, California," in California Geology , February 1977. 39. California State Department of Conservation, J.W. Williams and T.L. Bedrossian, Division of Mines and Geology, "Coastal Zone Geology Near Mendocino, California," California Geology (October 1976). A report on reconnaissance of geological hazards and mineral resources within a 25 square mile area between Russian Gulch and Buckhorn Cove. This popular recreation area was chosen as a test site to study landslides, sea cliff retreat, liquefaction, earthquake shaking, tsunami inundation, and mineral resources. 40. California State Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology. California Geology , Volume 32, #6, Sacramento, June 1979. Soil erosion in the Coast Forest Districts. Erosion and sedimentation can be very severe but can be reduced by early recognition and the right engineering practices. Article 1 is general; article 2 concerns Coast Forest district. 41. California State Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, C.W. Jennings, Fault Map of California with Locations of Volcanoes, Thermal Springs, and Termal Wells , Geologic Data Map Series, Map No. 1, 1:750,000, 1975. 42. California State Department of Conservation, Division
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Trinity County Resident Named Volunteer of the Year by California Association of Resource Conservation Districts
    Winter 2010 Vol. XVIII No. 4 Trinity County Resident Named Volunteer of the Year by California Association of Resource Conservation Districts enneth Baldwin of Trinity County was named KVolunteer of the Year by the California Associ- ation of Resource Conservation Districts (CARCD) during its recent annual meeting. Baldwin, a Registered Professional Forester and a long-time resident of Trinity County, was recognized for generously volunteering his expertise on behalf of numerous conservation projects, including the Weaverville Community Forest. Presenting the award is CARCD president Pat Quist. Baldwin has resided in Trinity County since early 1972. He is a partner in Baldwin, Blomstrom, Wilkinson and Associates, a forestry and environ- mental consulting firm based in Arcata with a sat- ellite office in Trinity County. Among the projects Baldwin has helped with in recent years are devel- opment of the Trinity County Community Wild- fire Protection Plan, and fire management plans for the downriver communities of Salyer, Hawk- ins Bar, Grays Flat and part of Willow Creek. Other projects include the fire management plans for the Grass Valley Creek Watershed and for the communities of Covington Mill, Long Canyon and Lake Forest Estates. Baldwin and Also In This Issue: his associates also shaped the Programmatic Timberland Environmental Impact Report Burn Days & Burn Permits ..................2 for 4800 acres in the Weaver Basin which New Watershed Stewards Member .....3 will reduce costs for forest health and fuels River Day at Coffee Creek ................ 4-5 reduction projects on private lands. Trinity River Revegetation Efforts ... 6-7 Baldwin has provided the District with much CWPP Update ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • California Solar Leader
    California solar leader California's Lake County, GE, and SunPower partnered on a multi-site 2.2- megawatt solar power system that-combined with an existing solar power installation-now makes Lake County home to the largest solar power installations on county facilities in California. By Vicky Boyd You could call Lake County ‘the little county that could.' Situated northeast of San Francisco, Lake County is not the most populous county in California, nor is it the richest. But progressive thinking on the part of the board of supervisors and Lake County Sanitation District has allowed the county to become a leader in sustainable resource development and use. In fact, Lake County is now a net energy producer. "The board of supervisors has taken a leadership role of becoming sustainable and becoming energy efficient. They did it prior to a lot of other counties, and we continue to do it," says Denise Rushing, Lake County supervisor representing District 3. "They were very receptive to solar and focused on energy efficiency." As a result, the county now has 3.1 megawatts of solar-generated power, making it the largest solar-energy system on county property in California. But the county probably wouldn't have been able to finance and build such large projects on its own. Rushing credits the SunPower Access Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) as the catalyst. Under that agreement, GE Energy Financial Services financed, and will own, a 2.1 MW project. SunPower Corp. of San Jose designed and built the project and will maintain it for 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Vulnerability Assessment for Mendocino County ______
    FIRE VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR MENDOCINO COUNTY ____________________________________________ _________________________________________ August 2020 Mendocino County Fire Vulnerability Assessment ________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SECTION I- OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................... 6 A. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 B. Project Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 6 C. Mendocino County Description and Demographics ................................................................ 7 D. Planning Area Basis .................................................................................................................. 8 SECTION II- COUNTY WILDFIRE ASSESSMENT ............................................................ 9 A. Wildfire Threat ......................................................................................................................... 9 B. Weather/Climate ........................................................................................................................ 9 C. Topography ............................................................................................................................. 10 D. Fuel Hazards ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State Parks Along California's North Coast Natural Beauty Along the Coast
    State Parks Along California's North Coast Natural Beauty Along the Coast California State Parks along the northern California coast offer visitors a chance to enjoy spectacular beauty with rugged beaches and redwood forests. Benbow Lake State Recreation Area (HUMBOLDT COUNTY), located two miles south of Garberville on Highway 101, has more than 600 acres of forest, 32,000 square feet of water, and a half-mile of beach. It's the perfect place for hiking, swimming, fishing, sailing and horseback riding. Occupying a mile of the South Fork of the Eel River, the park has three miles of hiking trails and a campground. Canoes and paddleboats may be available for rent from a concessionaire in the park. During the summer, the park is home to Shakespeare and art festivals. For more information, call (707) 923-3238 or (707) 247-3318. As with all visits to California State Parks, it's always a good idea to call before your visit to check on conditions. Richardson Grove State Park (HUMBOLDT COUNTY), located eight miles south of Garberville on Highway 101, features a forest of towering coast redwoods along the South Fork of the Eel River. The park is one of the oldest state parks. It was acquired in the 1920s and named after the state's 25th governor, Friend W. Richardson. There are developed campsites and a visitor center, built from an old lodge. The park is popular for fishing, with winter runs of silver and king salmon. For more information, call the park at (707) 247-3318. Sinkyone Wilderness State Park (HUMBOLDT and MENDOCNIO COUNTIES)\ Access to the park from the south is 50 miles north of Fort Bragg via Highway 101 and County Road 431 to Usal Beach.
    [Show full text]
  • California's North Coast Fishing Communities Historical
    California’s North Coast Fishing Communities Historical Perspective and Recent Trends Caroline Pomeroy, Cynthia J. Thomson, Melissa M. Stevens Published by California Sea Grant College Program Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive #0231 La Jolla CA 92093-0231 (858) 534-4446 www.csgc.ucsd.edu Publication No. T-072 This document was supported in part by the National Sea Grant College Program of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and produced under NOAA grant number NA10OAR4170060, project number C/P-1 through the California Sea Grant College Program. The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the views of any of those organizations. Sea Grant is a unique partnership of public and private sectors, combining research, education, and outreach for public service. It is a national network of universities meeting changing environmental and economic needs of people in our coastal, ocean, and Great Lakes regions. California’s North Coast Fishing Communities Historical Perspective and Recent Trends Final Report to the California State Coastal Conservancy Award 06–128 August 2010 Caroline Pomeroy1, Cynthia J. Thomson2, Melissa M. Stevens1,2 1 California Sea Grant, University of California, Santa Cruz, Center for Ocean Health, 100 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 2 NOAA, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Fisheries Ecology Division, 110 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 CONTENTS Project Summary Regional Profile Crescent City Profile Trinidad Profile Eureka Profile Fort Bragg/Noyo Harbor Profile Appendix A: Acronyms Appendix B: Glossary Appendix C: Methodological Detail Appendix D: Project Team Biographies Project Summary ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We gratefully acknowledge the support and input provided by North Coast fishing community members, including local fishermen, fish buyers, fishery-support business owners and staff, harbor managers and staff and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Mountains (Eastern Klamath Study), the Northern California Coast Ranges
    mountains (Eastern Klamath study), the Northern California Coast Ranges (North Coast study), and the Sierra Nevada section (Southern Sierra study). The majority of the fisher's historical distribution in California (Grinnell et al. 1937) occurred in these 3 ecological sections, with smaller portions found in the Northern California Coastal Section (the coast redwood [Sequoia sempervirens] belt) and the Southern Cascades sections (Figure 1). STUDY AREAS VEGETATION AND CLIMATE When compared to the fisher's entire geographic range, the 3 study areas examined here shared grossly similar climate and vegetation characteristics. Weather patterns across the 3 study areas are typical of California's Mediterranean climate: summers are hot and dry while winters are cool and moist, with precipitation often falling as snow in the higher elevations (Table 1). Natural vegetation communities found on all 3 study areas included montane hardwood forests, mixed conifer forests, true fir forests, and chaparral communities in the lower and drier portions of each study area (Mayer and Laudenslayer 1988). Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) forests made up an important 5 component of both northern California studies, but were absent from the southern Sierra study area. Despite these gross similarities, proximity to the Pacific Ocean and latitude (Figure 2) have resulted in important differences among the areas. The North Coast study area was located within 60 km of the Pacific Ocean and generally received more precipitation than either the Eastern Klamath or Southern Sierra study areas. Habitats tended to become more xeric with increased distance from the Pacific Ocean, resulting in a more diverse array of habitats available to fishers in the eastern section of the North Coast and throughout the Eastern Klamath study areas.
    [Show full text]
  • In Beautiful Lake County
    North Coast Opportunities - Clearlake Join the Local Food Movement with North Coast Opportunities (NCO) in beautiful Lake County, CA! Located in Northern California just two hours by car from the San Francisco Bay Area, the Sacramento Valley, and the Pacific Coast, Lake County is home to Clear Lake, the largest natural freshwater lake in California and possibly the oldest lake on the continent. Lake County boasts the cleanest air in the nation, spectacular scenic beauty, fine wines, delicious Lake County Mountain Pears, hand-crafted beers, and unsurpassed recreational opportunities — from hiking, biking, golf, and off-road adventures to boating, fishing, kayaking, birding, and even rockhounding. Joining NCO, you would be a key part of the Community Wellness Projects of NCOs’ Community Action Agency which facilitates the development of community and school gardens, farm to institution projects, a food hub throughout Lake and Mendocino counties, and a weekly food pantry in Clearlake. We are seeking a motivated individual who wants to make a positive difference in the lives of students and increase the number and prosperity of local farmers as part of the Lake County Farm to School project. You will carry out a variety of activities to further encourage changes in school food cultures by building student interest in and enjoyment of the healthier local foods that their school cafeterias are offering. These activities will range from classroom- and garden-based nutrition education lessons to cafeteria taste testing. As the schools build and develop their capacity to use local produce, they will serve as replicable models for schools throughout the community and the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Every Spring, a Variety of Annual and Perennial Wildflowers Bloom in Sonoma County’S Parks
    Every spring, a variety of annual and perennial wildflowers bloom in Sonoma County’s parks. This guide will help you identify some of the more common flowers. Parks known for their wildflower displays include Crane Creek, Foothill, North Sonoma Mountain, Sonoma Valley and Taylor Mountain, but you will notice certain flowers in almost every park. The flowers in this guide are organized by color, and more details can be found by clicking on the “More info” link in each entry. BLUE-ISH FLOWERS (Blue to Violet) YELLOW-ISH FLOWERS (Yellow to Orange) WHITISH FLOWERS REDDISH FLOWERS (Rose to Red) BLUE-ISH FLOWERS (Blue to Violet) Baby blue eyes Nemophila menziesii March - June | Annual This flower, a common annual herb and popular garden plant, grows throughout California, with two varieties common in Sonoma County. Var. atomaria, found in the north coast, has white flowers with black dots, often with a faint blue tint or blue veins. Var. menziesii has bright blue flowers with white centers generally dotted with black (pictured). Baby blue eyes are commonly grown as an ornamental flower in native plant or water-conserving gardens. BLUE-ISH FLOWERS (Blue to Violet) Pacific hound’s tongue Cynoglossum grande / Adelinia grande February - August | Perennial This five-lobed flower ranges from pink-purple to deep blue with white centers. It is in the borage family. There are dozens of Cynoglossum species found throughout the world, but C. grande grows only west of the Cascades and Sierra. Hound’s tongue prefers shady areas in woodlands and chaparral. It is similar to the invasive Myosotis sylvatica or forget-me-not.
    [Show full text]
  • Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report
    Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report May 20, 2021 ES-1 Final Report Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report Prepared by Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) May 20, 2021 Executive Summary The 2018 California State Rail Plan envisions a network of high-speed, intercity corridor, and commuter trains integrated with local transit, providing nearly seamless connections for riders seeking to reach all parts of the state. In corridors where no trains operate, the Rail Plan calls for express buses using the existing highway systems to provide access to the state’s rail system. The Rail Plan identified the I-680 corridor between the Tri-Valley area (i.e. Dublin, Pleasanton, and Livermore) and Suisun City as one such corridor, where express buses could link a Tri-Valley Transit Hub with the Suisun-Fairfield Amtrak Station, a stop for the Capitol Corridor trains. This Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study is an effort to define what such express bus service would be: its route, stops, connections with corridor and commuter trains, as well as its likely ridership, revenue, and costs for implementation. The study investigates the BART Dublin/Pleasanton BART station as a candidate for the Tri-Valley Transit Hub, along with potential improvements that could make the facility easier, safer, and more comfortable for riders to use. The study also explores options to better connect northern San Joaquin County communities with the Tri-Valley Hub. The distance between the Suisun Amtrak Station and the Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station is 53 miles, inclusive of a stop at the Martinez Amtrak Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Guild of Sommeliers' Napa Valley Staff Training Guide
    STAFF TRAINING MODULE Napa Valley Napa Valley, America’s most iconic wine region, appears saturated with the vine, yet it only accounts for a mere 4% of California wine. 45,000 acres of vineyards carpet the valley floor and dot surrounding hillsides and mountains. With an emphasis on luxury wines, this small region on California’s North Coast has cemented its image as a destination for wine tourists from around the globe, and as a world-class producer of Cabernet Sauvignon. Every third vine in Napa is Cabernet, yet the valley’s complex soil patterns, coupled with changing degrees of altitude, sunlight, and temperature, provide a diversity of source material for the winemaker to sculpt into wine. Nor is Cabernet the whole story; hundreds of varieties, from Sauvignon Blanc to Charbono to Zinfandel, thrive somewhere in the valley’s gentle, Mediterranean climate. 1 History As the second region nationally designated as an “American Viticultural Area”, Napa Valley AVA dates to 1981, but the valley’s rich history of viticulture began in the late 1830s. Spurred along by the booming days of the 1849 California Gold Rush, Napa wines achieved occasional international notice in the latter half of the 19th century, and some of today’s houses, such as Charles Krug, Schramsberg, and Beringer, date to the 1860s and ‘70s. In 1880 Scottish poet Robert Louis Stevenson famously pronounced Napa’s wines as “bottled poetry” during a honeymoon sojourn in the valley. Robert Mondavi The specter of temperance and Prohibition loomed large, and the valley’s industry was crippled with passage of the 18th Amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit Tri-Valley REGIONAL TOURISM ASSET ASSESSMENT
    Visit Tri-Valley REGIONAL TOURISM ASSET ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Visit Tri-Valley 5075 Hopyard Rd, Suite 240 Pleasanton, CA 94588 Solutions for your competitive world. Visit Tri-Valley Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Part 1: Understanding Tourism Assets 7 Part 2: Existing Regional Assets 13 Part 3: Pipeline Projects 21 Part 4: Tri-Valley Tourism Asset Gaps 23 Part 5: Developing a Tourism Asset Strategy 44 Part 6: Summary Comments 45 Appendix 46 Appendix 1: Completed interviews 47 Appendix 2: Sources 48 Appendix 3: Project Overview 49 Appendix 4: Scope of Work 50 2 | P a g e Visit Tri-Valley Executive Summary The following report was developed in an effort to improve Tri-Valley’s long term competitive position in the Northern California tourism market> the report sought to identify current tourism related destination assets as more importantly potential tourism asset gaps. The report also seeks to define a tourism strategy that can improve the competitive position of Tri Valley over the long term. The report identifies several key challenges including the lack of perception the region has as a destination and that it is seen by some to be a series of communities. Additionally, the areas have significant differences between them. For example, Livermore, with its downtown area and wineries, is a very different experience to San Ramon, which generates a significant level of corporate travel. Moving forward Tri-Valley needs to consider three specific steps with regard to its assets. 1. Continue to build its brand assets in order to create value for all of the areas within the region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historic Range of Beaver in the North Coast of California: a Review of the Evidence
    THE HISTORIC RANGE OF BEAVER IN THE NORTH COAST OF CALIFORNIA: A REVIEW OF THE EVIDENCE Prepared for: By: The Occidental Arts and Ecology Center WATER Institute December 2013 This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1 Executive Summary 3 Introduction 3 Materials and Methods 8 Results 8 Discussion 18 Recommendations 23 References 25 FIGURES, TABLES AND APPENDICES Figure 1 Study Area 4 Current Distribution Of Beaver In The Southern Oregon and Northern Figure 2 6 California Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit Current Distribution Of Beaver In The Central California Coast Figure 3 7 Evolutionarily Significant Unit Figure 4 Duflot de Mofras (1841) Map of Fort Ross and Nearby Russian Farms 12 Figure 5 Map of Physical Evidence and Historic Accounts Within Study Area 14 Words For Beaver In Native California Languages As Reported By Figure 6 17 Merriam (1977) and Kostromitinov (1974) Table 1 Tribes With A Word For Beaver As Reported By Powers 15 Summary of Evidence of Beaver in Coastal California From the Klamath Appendix A River to the Monterey Bay Including the San Francisco Bay Utilization of Beaver for Watershed Restoration and Climate Change Appendix B Resiliency in The West Appendix C Summary of Ecosystem Services Provided by Beaver Summary of the inclusion of beaver (Castor canadensis) in the Final Appendix D Recovery Plan for the Central California Coast coho salmon ESU Appendix E Current and Historic Distribution of Beaver in California Appendix F History of Beaver Planting in California and Supporting Documents
    [Show full text]