DOCSLIB.ORG

Death Penalty March 1998 News

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Death Penalty March 1998 News DEATH PENALTY MARCH 1998 NEWS AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL 1 Easton Street AI Index: ACT 53/02/98 London WC1X 8DJ Distribution: SC/DP/PO/CO/GR United Kingdom A SUMMARY OF EVENTS ON THE DEATH PENALTY AND MOVES TOWARDS WORLDWIDE ABOLITION AZERBAIJAN AND ESTONIA ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY Early into the new year, two more countries have Since 1993 AI has recorded 144 death sentences abolished the death penalty, bringing to 63 the including one in 1998. worldwide total of countries which are It is expected that the 128 people abolitionist for all crimes. currently under sentence of death will have their On 22 January President Haydar Aliev of sentences commuted to 15 to 20 years’ Azerbaijan announced his intention of imprisonment. In future, penalties of life abolishing the death penalty. “I believe that imprisonment or imprisonment for 20 to 25 years strengthening the struggle against crime in itself will be applied for those 11 offences which will reduce the number of criminal actions. At carried a possible death sentence at the time of the same time humanization of our policy of abolition. These include treason, premeditated, punishment will also create among the people a aggravated murder and aggravated rape. healthy attitude toward violations and crimes”, Azerbaijan currently has observer status he said. at the Council of Europe. It has applied to On 10 February the country’s parliament become a full member. agreed by 104 votes to three to adopt the President’s proposal to abolish the death penalty On 18 March the Estonian Parliament for all crimes. The relevant law came into force (Riigikogu) voted to ratify Protocol No. 6 to the with its publication in the presidential gazette on European Convention for the Protection of 21 February. Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms A moratorium on capital punishment had (European Convention on Human Rights). This been in force since June 1993. In 1996 the protocol provides for the abolition of the death number of articles in the Criminal Code penalty except in time of war or imminent threat punishable by death was reduced from 33 to 12 of war. Estonia had signed Protocol No. 6 in and the death penalty was abolished for women 1993 upon its accession to the Council of and for men over the age of 65. In August 1997 Europe. the Chairman of the Supreme Court publicly The decision to ratify the protocol was expressed his support for abolition of the death adopted by a vote of 39 in favour and 30 penalty. against. The effect of the vote was to abolish the In January the President stated that death death penalty for all crimes. Following the vote, sentences had been carried out on five people in Foreign Minister Toomas Hendrik Ilves said: 1988, six in 1989 and three in 1990. No further “Estonia has made another important step death sentences had been carried out until 1993, towards recognising common European values”. he stated, when eight people were executed. Death Penalty News March 1998 1 In December 1996 the parliament had defeated by 39 votes to seven. According to the introduced life imprisonment as an alternative to Estonian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, death capital punishment under the criminal code (see sentences continued to be imposed throughout DP News June 1997), although a proposal to 1997. The last execution was in 1991. abolish the death penalty at that time was GUATEMALA’S FIRST government to send a delegation to the United States to study the more “modern” method of LETHAL INJECTION execution by lethal injection. EXECUTION “BOTCHED” Some 15 prisoners are currently under Manuel Martínez Coronado, an impoverished sentence of death. peasant farmer of indigenous descent, was SOUTH KOREA EXECUTES executed by lethal injection on 10 February after a series of last-minute legal appeals were 23 rejected by the Guatemalan judiciary. The government had also failed to respond to a On 30 December 1997, 23 people were hanged request from the Inter-American Commission on in prisons in the capital, Seoul, and the cities of Human Rights for the execution to be suspended Taegu, Pusan, Taejon and Kwangju. The 18 until it could consider whether the proceedings men and five women were executed without which convicted Martínez Coronado met the advance warning and the families of the standards set forth in the American Convention prisoners were not informed prior to the on Human Rights, to which Guatemala is a party. executions. These were the first executions Martínez Coronado, who was the first person to since November 1995 when 19 persons were be executed in Guatemala by lethal injection, had executed in one day. been found guilty of multiple homicide carried In November 1996 South Korea’s out in 1995 in the context of a family land Constitutional Court ruled that the death penalty dispute. was constitutional and a “necessary evil” but that it should only be used in exceptional cases. The execution was broadcast live; radio However, the court also said that the death and television audiences could hear the penalty retains an aspect of institutional murder condemned man’s three children and their and for this reason debate surrounding its use mother sobbing in the lethal injection chamber’s should continue. The court said that the death observation room as the execution took place. penalty should be abolished in the future, when Although the authorities had claimed that it is no longer needed as a criminal deterrent. execution would be painless and “over in 30 seconds”, Martínez Coronado took 18 minutes to DEVELOPMENTS IN THE die. Witnesses present in the observation room USA reported that the executioners had trouble finding a vein into which to insert the injection. Human Rights Procurator Julio Arango said: “I Iowa think we all have the obligation to tell what happened: his arms were bleeding heavily. I The legislature of the state of Iowa will not think everyone who was there was suffering.” debate or vote upon reinstatement of the death penalty during its 1998 session. Proponents of Between 1983 and 1996 a de facto the death penalty decided in February to drop moratorium on executions was in place. their plans for a full debate because of lack of However, in response to a rising crime rate support. Governor Terry Branstad described the Guatemala extended the range of crimes for opposition to the death penalty as “strong and which the death penalty could be applied. organised” but said he believed that Guatemala’s first execution in 13 years, carried reintroduction was “a matter of time”. out by firing squad in September 1996, was televised live (see DP News September 1996). Texas Executes First Woman since The revulsion engendered in viewers moved the 1860s Death Penalty News March 1998 2 ___________________________________________________________________________ Karla Faye Tucker, who was convicted in 1984 punishment was not a “prudent culmination for a of killing two people with a pickaxe, was criminal justice system which is human and executed by lethal injection on 3 February. She therefore fallible”. is the second woman to be executed in the United States since the US Supreme Court ruled BOSNIAN COURT RULING in 1976 that the death penalty was constitutional and the first woman to be executed in Texas ABOLISHES DEATH PENALTY since 1863. Karla Faye Tucker IN PEACETIME gained worldwide publicity because of her apparent rehabilitation and conversion to Meeting on 5 September 1997, the Human Christianity; she also earned support from a Rights Chamber of the Human Rights brother and sister of the victims as well as a Commission for Bosnia and Herzegovina juror from her trial. Despite appeals for decided in the case of Damjanovic vs. Bosnia commutation from Pope John Paul II, the and Herzegovina that provision for the death European Parliament and others, the Texas penalty in peacetime is incompatible with the Board of Pardons and Parole did not recommend Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina commutation of her death sentence, nor did (Article II, paragraph 4 of which provides for the Governor George W. Bush order a stay of enjoyment of the rights and freedoms in a series execution. of international agreements, including the Following the execution of Karla Faye Second Optional Protocol to the International Tucker, Mary Robinson, the United Nations Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, aiming at (UN) High Commissioner for Human Rights, the abolition of the death penalty). The ruling issued a statement on 4 February in which she also makes clear that the imposition of a death said that “The increasing use of the death penalty sentence or the carrying out of an execution for a in the United States and in a number of other crime committed in peacetime would violate the states is a matter of serious concern and runs General Framework Agreement for Peace in counter to the international community’s Bosnia and Herzegovina, Article 1 of which expressed desire for the abolition of the death provides that Bosnia and Herzegovina will penalty.” She added: “I have full sympathy for secure the rights provided in a series of the families of the victims of murder and other international agreements including Protocol No. crimes but I do not accept that one death justifies 6 to the European Convention on Human Rights another.” concerning the abolition of the death penalty. The appellant, Sretko Damjanovic, had UNITED KINGDOM - MURDER been sentenced to death by a military court in 1993 for genocide and war crimes against the CONVICTION OF HANGED civilian population. The Human Rights Chamber MAN QUASHED ruled that the Criminal Law did not define these crimes with sufficient precision to satisfy the Nearly 46 years after Mahmood Hussein Mattan restriction of the death penalty under Protocol was hanged for murder in Cardiff, Wales, his No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Race, Religion and Innocence in the Karla Faye Tucker and Gary Graham Cases
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Law Faculty Scholarly Articles Law Faculty Publications Spring 2006 Litigating Salvation: Race, Religion and Innocence in the Karla Faye Tucker and Gary Graham Cases Melynda J. Price University of Kentucky College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/law_facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Melynda Price, Litigating Salvation: Race, Religion and Innocence in the Karla Faye Tucker and Gary Graham Cases, 15 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Soc. Just. 267 (2006). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Faculty Publications at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Litigating Salvation: Race, Religion and Innocence in the Karla Faye Tucker and Gary Graham Cases Notes/Citation Information Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice, Vol. 15, No. 2 (Spring 2006), pp. 267-298 This article is available at UKnowledge: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/law_facpub/266 LITIGATING SALVATION: RACE, RELIGION AND INNOCENCE IN THE KARLA FAYE TUCKER AND GARY GRAHAM CASES MELYNDA J. PRICE* I. INTRODUCTION "If you believe in it for one, you believe in it for everybody. If you don't believe in it, don't believe in it for anybody." -Karla Faye Tucker' "My responsibility is to make sure our laws are enforced fairly and evenly without preference or special treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • ICC-01/18 Date: 16 March 2020 PRE
    ICC-01/18-111 17-03-2020 1/10 NM PT Original: English No.: ICC-01/18 Date: 16 March 2020 PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Péter Kovács, Presiding Judge Judge Marc Perrin de Brichambaut Judge Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou SITUATION IN THE STATE OF PALESTINE Public Amicus Curiae Submission of Observations Pursuant to Rule 103 Source: Intellectum Scientific Society (hereinafter Intellectum) No. ICC-01/18 1/10 ICC-01/18-111 17-03-2020 2/10 NM PT Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the Court to: The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence Fatou Bensouda, Prosecutor James Stewart, Deputy Prosecutor Legal Representatives of the Victims Legal Representatives of the Applicants Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants (Participation/Reparation) The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the Victims Defence Paolina Massidda States’ Representatives Amici Curiae The competent authorities of the ▪ Professor John Quigley State of Palestine ▪ Guernica 37 International Justice The competent authorities of the Chambers State of Israel ▪ The European Centre for Law and Justice ▪ Professor Hatem Bazian ▪ The Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust ▪ The Czech Republic ▪ The Israel Bar Association ▪ Professor Richard Falk ▪ The Organization of Islamic Cooperation ▪ The Lawfare Project, the Institute for NGO Research, Palestinian Media Watch, & the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs ▪ MyAQSA ▪ Professor Eyal Benvenisti ▪ The Federal Republic of Germany ▪ Australia No. ICC-01/18 2/10 ICC-01/18-111 17-03-2020 3/10 NM PT ▪ UK Lawyers for Israel, B’nai B’rith UK, the International Legal Forum, the Jerusalem Initiative and the Simon Wiesenthal Centre ▪ The Palestinian Bar Association ▪ Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Retroactive Application of the Genocide Convention William A
    University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy Volume 4 Article 4 Issue 2 Spring 2010 Retroactive Application of the Genocide Convention William A. Schabas Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.stthomas.edu/ustjlpp Part of the Human Rights Law Commons Bluebook Citation William A. Schabas, Retroactive Application of the Genocide Convention, 4 U. St. Thomas J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 36 (2010). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UST Research Online and the University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy. For more information, please contact Editor-in-Chief Patrick O'Neill. RETROACTIVE APPLICATION OF THE GENOCIDE CONVENTION WILLIAM A. SCHABAS* THE CONVENTION FOR THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE was adopted on December 9, 1948,' and entered into force on January 11, 1951 2 It defines the crime of genocide and sets out various norms governing its punishment, as well as establishing the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in the matter of disputes about its interpretation and application. Its obligations essentially concern issues of criminal liability for the crime. Nevertheless, in the recent case between Bosnia and Serbia, the International Court held that it could make a finding that a State had either committed genocide or failed to prevent it.3 This might, as a result, lead to a finding that some form of just compensation would be due, although in the specifics of that case the Court declined to make such a finding. The Genocide Convention was drafted by the United Nations General Assembly pursuant to Resolution 96(I), which was adopted two years earlier on December 11, 1946.
    [Show full text]
  • THE OVERVIEW; Divisive Case of a Killer of Two Ends As Texas
    EXECUTION IN TEXAS: THE OVERVIEW; Divisive Case of a Killer of Two Ends as... Page 1 of 5 EXECUTION IN TEXAS: THE OVERVIEW EXECUTION IN TEXAS: THE OVERVIEW;Divisive Case of a Killerof Two Ends as TexasExecutes Tucker By Sam Howe Verhovek Feb.4, 1998 See the article in its original context from February 4, 1998, Section A, Page 1 Buy Reprints VIEW ON TIMESMACHl�E TimesMachine is an exclusive benefit for home deliveryand digital subscribers. Saying "I love all of you very much" and smiling as lethal chemicals were pumped into her body, Karla Faye Tucker was executed tonight in Texas, becoming the first woman put to death by the state since the Civil War. The execution ended a case that attracted an extraordinary amount of attention around the world and led to fierce debate about redemption on death row. The prospect of executing a woman clearly exposed a societal raw nerve, but it also prompted many death-penalty supporters to insist that Ms. Tucker had gained undeserved sympathy because of her sex and her doe-eyed good looks. Ms. Tucker, 38, who murdered two people with a pickax in Houston 15 years ago, came to be known recently, through relentless media coverage of her death row interviews, as a soft-spoken, gentle-looking, born-again Christian pleading for mercy. But her final appeals to the Supreme Court and to Gov. George W. Bush for a reprieve were denied today. She became the second woman executed in the United States since the Supreme Court allowed the death penalty to resume, in 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • Episode 13: Women Hello and Welcome to the Death Penalty
    Episode 13: Women Hello and welcome to the Death Penalty Information Center’s series of podcasts, exploring issues related to capital punishment. In this edition, we will be discussing women and the death penalty. Have women always been represented on death row in the United States? When was the first woman executed? Yes, in theory women have always been eligible for the death penalty in the United States, though they have been executed far less often than men. The first woman executed in what is now the U.S. was Jane Champion, in 1632. She received the death penalty in Virginia for murder. The first woman executed in the modern era of the death penalty was Velma Barfield. She was given a lethal injection in North Carolina in 1984. Do death penalty laws treat men and women differently? No. The laws are written in a gender-neutral way. However, the federal government forbids the execution of a woman who is pregnant. The U.S. has also ratified a treaty with a similar provision. In some countries, criminal laws are specifically written to affect women and men differently. What percentage of death row inmates are women? What percentage of executions involve women? As of October 31, 2010, there were 55 women on death row. They made up 1.7% of all death row inmates. In all of American history, there have only been 569 documented executions of women, out of over 15,000 total executions. Since 1976, twelve women have been executed, accounting for about 1% of executions during that time.
    [Show full text]
  • From Incitement to Indictment
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 98 Article 4 Issue 3 Spring Spring 2008 From Incitement to Indictment - Prosecuting Iran's President for Advocating Israel's Destruction and Piecing Together Incitement Law's Emerging Analytical Framework Gregory S. Gordon Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Gregory S. Gordon, From Incitement to Indictment - Prosecuting Iran's President for Advocating Israel's Destruction and Piecing Together Incitement Law's Emerging Analytical Framework, 98 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 853 (2007-2008) This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4 169/08/9803-0853 THE JOURNALOF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 98, No. 3 Copyright 0 2008 by Northwestern Universily, School of Law Printed in U.S.A. FROM INCITEMENT TO INDICTMENT? PROSECUTING IRAN'S PRESIDENT FOR ADVOCATING ISRAEL'S DESTRUCTION AND PIECING TOGETHER INCITEMENT LAW'S EMERGING ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK GREGORY S. GORDON* Israel must be wiped off the face of the map. -Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Let us consult yet, in this long forewhile How to ourselves we may prevent this ill. 2 ,-Homer On October 25, 2005, at an anti-Zionism conference in Tehran, Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, called for Israel to "be wiped off the face of the map "-thefirst in a series of incendiary speeches arguably advocating liquidation of the Jewish state.
    [Show full text]
  • Referral of Iranian President Ahmadinejad on the Charge of Incitement to Commit Genocide
    REFERRAL OF IRANIAN PRESIDENT AHMADINEJAD ON THE CHARGE OF INCITEMENT TO COMMIT GENOCIDE AMB. MEIR ROSENNE PROF. ELIE WIESEL AMB. DORE GOLD IRIT KOHN, ADV. AMB. EYTAN BENTSUR M.K. DAN NAVEH PRINCIPAL AUTHOR: JUSTUS REID WEINER, ESQ. The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs ®¯¢Ú© ‰È„Ó ¯Â·Èˆ ÈÈÈÚÏ ÈÓÏ˘Â¯È‰ ÊίӉ Dedicated to the victims of Darfur © 2006 Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs Tel Hai Street 13, Jerusalem 92107, Israel Tel. 972-2-5619281 Fax. 972-2-5619112 Email: [email protected] Internet website: www.jcpa.org ISBN 965-218-055-6 Production Coordinator: Edna Weinstock-Gabay Graphic Design: Rami & Jacky / Hagar Rivka Moshe Acknowledgements The principal author wishes to thank his colleagues at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, including Diane Morrison (for her legal research), Jeremy Siegman, Jennifer Tullman, and Ilana Hart. Photo Credits Front Cover: AP Photo Back Cover: Ahmadinejad speaks during a conference on Oct. 26, 2005 entitled ‘The World Without Zionism.’ Ahmadinejad states that Israel should be “wiped off the map,” the official IRNA news agency reported. (AP Photo/ISNA) Executive Summary President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad of the Islamic verbal barrages, however, pose no existential threat Republic of Iran has made the destruction of Israel to ordinary people in the street. Ahmadinejad’s his avowed policy. Ahamadinejad’s declaration reckless anti-Semitic tirades that “the Jews are in 2005 that “Israel should be wiped off the map” very filthy people,” “[the Jews have] inflicted the was met by widespread international outcry. Yet, most damage on the human race,” “[the Jews are] this declaration was not an isolated incident, but a bunch of bloodthirsty barbarians,” “they should the first of many during the past year.
    [Show full text]
  • OPEN LETTER from AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL to GOVERNOR GEORGE W BUSH of TEXAS CONCERNING the IMMINENT 100Th EXECUTION UNDER HIS ADMINISTRATION
    AMR 51/146/99 6 September 1999 OPEN LETTER FROM AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL TO GOVERNOR GEORGE W BUSH OF TEXAS CONCERNING THE IMMINENT 100th EXECUTION UNDER HIS ADMINISTRATION “Intravenous tubes attached to his arms will carry the instrument of death, a toxic fluid designed specifically for the purpose of killing human beings. The witnesses, standing a few feet away, will behold Callins, no longer a defendant, an appellant, or a petitioner, but a man, strapped to a gurney, and seconds away from extinction.” Justice Blackmun, US Supreme Court, 1994. Dear Governor Amnesty International deeply regrets that the dehumanizing process described by Justice Blackmun continues at an increasing pace in Texas, and has now been repeated 99 times under your administration. The organization respectfully urges you to consider the appalling human reality behind that stark statistic and prevent it from increasing yet further, due to occur within days. It was apt that Justice Blackmun should have chosen the case of a Texas death row inmate -- Bruce Edwin Callins -- in which to announce that he would “no longer tinker with the machinery of death”. For then, as now, Texas led the nation in the practice of judicial killing, a practice which Justice Blackmun, after more than 20 years of experience, had concluded could not be administered consistently, fairly or reliably. At the end of the same year, 1994, in which Justice Blackmun wrote his now famous dissent, you, Mr Governor, were elected to the highest executive office in Texas. Amnesty International deeply regrets that in the intervening years, the rate of judicial killing has increased to a point where one human being is being put to death approximately every 10 days in the Texas lethal injection chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • A Content Analysis of Media Accounts of Death Penalty and Life Without Parole Cases Lisa R
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2017 A Content Analysis of Media Accounts of Death Penalty and Life Without Parole Cases Lisa R. Kirk East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Kirk, Lisa R., "A Content Analysis of Media Accounts of Death Penalty and Life Without Parole Cases" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3184. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3184 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Content Analysis of Media Accounts of Death Penalty and Life Without Parole Cases ____________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Criminal Justice/Criminology East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in Criminal Justice & Criminology ____________________________ by Lisa Regina Kirk May 2017 ____________________________ Dr. John Whitehead, Chair Dr. Jennifer Pealer Dr. Larry Miller Keywords: Death Penalty, Life Without Parole, LWOP, Media, Newsworthy Murderers, Juvenile Murderers, Serial Killer ABSTRACT A Content Analysis of Media Accounts of Death Penalty and Life Without Parole Cases by Lisa Regina Kirk The study analyzed a convenience sample of published accounts of death penalty cases and life without parole cases. The objective of the study was to explore factors that influence the selection of cases for coverage in books, think tank reports (e.g., Heritage Foundation), and periodicals and factors related to coverage of homicides resulting in a death penalty sentence or a life without parole sentence (often termed “America’s other death penalty”).
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Winter 2020 A quarterly report by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins Consultant to the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Winter 2020 (As of January 1, 2020) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2620 (2,620 – 189* - 906M = 1525 enforceable sentences) Race of Defendant: White 1,103 (42.10%) Black 1,089 (41.56%) Latino/Latina 353 (13.47%) Native American 27 (1.03%) Asian 47 (1.79%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,567 (97.98%) Female 53 (2.02%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 31 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, CaliforniaM, ColoradoM, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, OregonM, PennsylvaniaM, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. M States where a moratorium prohibiting execution has been imposed by the Governor. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 22 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire [see note below], New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Hampshire repealed the death penalty prospectively. The man already sentenced remains under sentence of death.] * Designates the number of people in non-moratorium states who are not under active death sentence because of court reversal but whose sentence may be reimposed. M Designates the number of people in states where a gubernatorial moratorium on execution has been imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death Penalty and Drug Offences Professor William Schabas Irish Centre for Human Rights National University of Ireland, Galw
    THE DEATH PENALTY AND DRUG OFFENCES PROFESSOR WILLIAM SCHABAS IRISH CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND, GALWAY CHINA, OCTOBER 2010 PAPER PREPARED BY THE IRISH CENTRE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS & THE INTERNATIONAL CENTRE ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND DRUG POLICY This lecture is funded with the support of the European Union The Death Penalty for Drug Offences According to the 2010 United Nations quinquennial report on the status of the death penalty, there are forty-seven countries in the world that retain capital punishment.1 Of this group, thirty2 have legislation prescribing the death penalty for drug-related offences. There are also two additional territories, Taiwan ROC and Palestine, which prescribe the death penalty for drug crimes.3 State practice and legislation vis-à-vis the death penalty for drugs varies enormously between these countries. A number of governments display a deep ambivalence towards capital punishment in general, and towards executing drug offenders specifically; whereas for others the execution of drug offenders forms a routine part of the criminal justice system. Some states pass death sentences fairly regularly, yet in practice executions are rarely or never carried out. Some states are extremely secretive about their capital punishment practices, while others are fairly open and some even enthusiastically publicise the executions of drug offenders. There is also a wide variation in the adherence to fair trial standards from one country to another. Despite varying state practice, hundreds of people are executed for drug offences each year around the world, a figure that very likely exceeds one thousand when taking into account those countries that keep their death penalty statistics secret.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Criminal Court and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
    BICOM Briefing The International Criminal Court and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict February 2021 Introduction In a 2-1 ruling, a Pre-Trial Chamber at the International Criminal Court (ICC) ruled on Friday 5th February 2021 that the court has territorial jurisdiction in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza. Two of the judges, Marc Perrin de Brichambaut of France and Reine Adélaïde Sophie Alapini-Gansou of Benin, accepted the premise that since the Palestinian Authority (PA) joined the Rome Statute, it should be treated as a state. The dissenting judge, Péter Kovács, rejected the argument that the PA is a state and that it therefore does not constitute the required “state inside whose territory the said actions took place.” Kovács wrote that he “felt neither the Majority’s approach nor its reasoning appropriate in answering the question before the Chamber” adding that in his opinion “they have no legal basis in the Rome Statute, and even less so, in public international law.” The decision was praised by the Palestinians and criticised by Israelis. PA Prime Minister Mohammed Shtayyeh called it “a victory for justice and humanity and the blood of the victims and their families”. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the court biased, adding that “it was making delusional accusations against the only democracy in the Middle East… [while] refus[ing] to investigate real war crimes that are committed by brutal dictatorships, such as Iran and Syria, on a nearly daily basis”. Some Western countries have expressed their opposition
    [Show full text]