Of Volumes 1–5 (2002–2006)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Of Volumes 1–5 (2002–2006) Index of Volumes 1–5 (2002–2006) Articles Assayag J. How to Become European? The Intellectual Legacy of Ernest Gellner. Vol. 2 No 2, September 2003, p. 143–161. Banschikova A. A. Woman in Ancient Egypt: Evolution of Personal and Social Positions. Vol. 5 No 1, March 2006, p. 109–124. Barnard A. Mutual Aid and the Foraging Mode of Thought: Re-reading Kropotkin on the Khoisan. Vol. 3 No 1, March 2004, p. 3–21. Barry, III H. Community Customs Associated with Political Sub- ordination. Vol. 2 No 1, March 2003, p. 116–130. Barry, III H. Social Behaviors Associated with Hereditary Community Leadership. Vol. 4 No 2, September 2005, p. 3–17. Baum R. Ritual and Rationality: Religious Roots of the Bureaucratic State in Ancient China. Vol. 3 No 1, March 2004, p. 41–68. Baum R. The Origin of Polities: A Preliminary Inquiry into the Evolution of Command and Control in Human Collectivities. Vol. 3 No 2, September 2004, p. 55–92. Bell D. Evolution of Middle Eastern Social Structures: A New Model. Vol. 3 No 2, September 2004, p. 25–54. Bell D. Bands, Fertility and the Social Organization of Early Humans. Vol. 5 No 2, September 2006, p. 3–23. Berent M. The Stateless Polis. A Reply to Critics. Vol. 5 No 1, March 2006, p. 141–163. Bondarenko D. M. A Homoarchic Alternative to the Homoarchic State: Benin Kingdom of the 13th – 19th Centuries. Vol 4 No 2, September 2005, p. 18–88. Bondarenko D. M., Grinin L. E., Korotayev A. V. Alternative Pathways of Social Evolution. Vol 1 No 1, July 2002, p. 54–79. Buchowski M. The Social Condition of Knowledge: Gellner and the ‘Postmodernist Menace’. Vol. 2 No 2, September 2003, p. 34–54. Carmack R. M. A Historical Anthropological Perspective on the Mayan Civilization. Vol. 2 No 1, March 2003, p. 71–115. Carneiro R. L. Stellar Evolution and Social Evolution: A Study in Parallel Processes. Vol. 4 No 1, March 2005, p. 136–159. Carneiro R. L. Was the Chiefdom a Congelation of Ideas? Vol. 1 No 1, July 2002, p. 80–100. Index of Volumes 1–5 (2002–2006) 157 Chabal P., Feinman G., and Skalník P. Beyond States and Empires: Chiefdoms and Informal Politics. Vol. 3 No 1, March 2004, p. 22–40. Chase-Dunn C. Globalization from Below: Toward a Collectively Rational and Democratic Global Commonwealth. Vol. 2 No 1, March 2003, p. 195–237. Christian D. Macrohistory: The Play of Scales. Vol. 4 No 1, March 2005, p. 22–60. Claessen H. J. M. Developments in Evolutionism. Vol. 5 No 1, March 2006, p. 3–41. Claessen H. J. M. Early State Intricacies. Vol. 4 No 2, September 2005, p. 151–158. Claessen H. J. M. Was the State Inevitable? Vol. 1 No 1, July 2002, p. 101–117. Collins R. Geopolitics in an Era of Internationalism. Vol. 1 No 1, July 2002, p. 118–139. Czeglédy A. P. The Words and Things of Ernest Gellner. Vol. 2 No 2, September 2003, p. 6–33. Ember M., Ember C. R. Toward the Evolution of a More Civil World Vol. 3 No 1, March 2004, p. 137–161. Gammer M. ‘Proconsul of the Caucasus’: A Re-examination of Yermolov. Vol. 2 No 1, March 2003, p. 177–194. Grinchenko S. N. Meta-evolution of the Nature System – The Framework of History. Vol. 5 No 1, March 2006, p. 42–88. Grinin L. E. Democracy and Early State. Vol. 3 No 2, September 2004, p. 93–149. Grinin L. E. The Early State and Its Analogues. Vol. 2 No 1, March 2003, p. 131–176. Guidi A. The Archaeology of Early State in Italy. Vol. 5 No 2, Septem- ber 2006, p. 55–90. Hall T. D. Mongols in World-Systems History. Vol. 4 No 2, September 2005, p. 89–118. Hann C. Civil Society:The Sickness, Not the Cure? Vol. 2 No 2, Sep- tember 2003, p. 55–74. Heady P. Gellner's Ideal Kinship Language and the Connection between Biological and Social Relatedness. Vol. 2 No 2, September 2003, p. 75–87. Hughes-Warrington M. Big History. Vol. 4 No 1, March 2005, p. 7–21. Ingold T. On the Distinction between Evolution and History. Vol. 1 No 1, March 2002, p. 5–24. 158 Social Evolution & History / September 2006 Karakatsianis Y. Some Remarks on the Origins of Absolute Leaders: The Jacobine Politician and His Role in the Political History. Vol. 5 No 1, March 2006, p. 125–140. Kowalewski S. A. The New Past: From Region to Macroregion. Vol. 3 No 1, March 2004, p. 81–105. Kowalewski S. A. What is the Community? The Long View from Oaxaca, Mexico. Vol. 2 No 1, March 2003, p. 4–24. Kradin N. N. Archaeological Criteria of Civilization. Vol. 5 No 1, March 2006, p. 89–108. Kradin N. N. Ernest Gellner and Debates on Nomadic Feudalism. Vol. 2 No 2, September 2003, p. 162–176. Kurtz D. V. Political Power and Government: Negating the Anthro- pomorphized State. Vol. 5 No 2, September 2006, p. 91–111. Kurtz D. V. The Evolution of Politics and the Transition from Political Status to Political Office. Vol. 3 No 2, September 2004, p. 150–175. Manning P. Cross-Community Migration: A Distinctive Human Pattern. Vol. 5 No 2, September 2006, p. 24–54. Meliantsev V. A. Russia's Comparative Economic Development in the Long Run. Vol. 3 No 1, March 2004, p. 106–136. Nazaretyan A. P. Big (Universal) History Paradigm: Versions and Approaches. Vol. 4 No 1, March 2005, p. 61–86. Nefedov S. A. A Model of Demographic Cycles in a Traditional Society: The Case of Ancient China. Vol. 3 No 1, March 2004, p. 69–80. Quigley D. Is a Theory of Caste Still Possible? Vol. 1 No 1, July 2002, p. 140–170. Shankland D. Gellner and Islam. Vol. 2 No 2, September 2003, p. 118–142. Skalník P. Ernest Gellner's Legacy: In Favour of Anthropology, Vol. 2 No 2, September 2003, p. 194–202. Skalník P. Gellner on Modernity Vol. 2 No 2, September 2003, p. 203–224. Skalník P. Gellner's Encounter with Soviet etnografiia. Vol. 2 No 2, September 2003, p. 177–193. Smyntyna O. V. Ecological Explanation of Hunter-Gatherers Behavior: An Attempt of Historical Overview. Vol. 3 No 2, September 2004, p. 3–24. Snooks G. D. Big History or Big Theory? Uncovering the Laws of Life. Vol. 4 No 1, March 2005, p. 160–188. Snooks G. D. Uncovering the Laws of Global History. Vol. 1 No 1, March 2002, p. 25–53. Spencer C. S., Redmond E. M. Militarism, Resistance and Early State Development in Oaxaca, Mexico. Vol. 2 No 1, March 2003 p. 25–70. Index of Volumes 1–5 (2002–2006) 159 Spier F. How Big History Works: Energy Flows and the Rise and Demise of Complexity. Vol. 4 No 1, March 2005, p. 87–135. Tobolka R. Gellner and Geertz in Morocco: A Segmentary Debate. Vol. 2 No 2, September 2003, p. 88–117. Turchin P., Korotayev A. V. Population Dynamics and Internal Warfare: A Reconsideration. Vol. 5 No 2, September 2006. p. 112–147. van der Vliet E. Polis. The Problem of Statehood. Vol. 4 No 2, Septem- ber 2005, p. 120–150. Conference Reports Banschikova A. A., Kavykin O. I. Fourth International Conference ‘Hierarchy and Power in the History of Civilizations’ (Moscow, June 13–16, 2006). Vol. 5 No 2, September 2006, p. 148–155. Bondarenko D. M., Kavykin O. I. Third International Conference ‘Hierarchy and Power in the History of Civilizations’ (Moscow, June 18–21, 2004). Vol. 4 No 1, March 2005, p. 189–199. Review Essays Bondarenko D. M. African Studies in Russia: The Present Day in Light of the Past. Review of N. B. Kochakova (ed.), Ethnologica Africana. In Memory of Dmitri Alexeevich Olderogge. Vol. 3 No 1, March 2004, p. 186–189. Carneiro R. L. Multiple Trajectories in Political Development: Review of J. Haas (ed.), From Leaders to Rulers. Vol. 3 No 1, March 2004, p. 162–175. Magee G. B. As Big as It Gets: ‘Big Theory’ and The Collapse of Darwinism. Review of G. D. Snooks, The Collapse of Darwinism, Or the Rise of a Realist Theory of Life. Vol. 5 No 1, March 2006, p. 164–174. Sanderson S. K. How Chase-Dunn and Hall Got It Almost Right. Review of C. Chase-Dunn and T. D. Hall, Rise and Demise: Comparing World-Systems. Vol. 1 No 1, March 2002, p. 171–176. Sanderson S. K. Review of Robert L. Carneiro, Evolutionism in Cul- tural Anthropology: A Critical History. Vol. 2 No 1, March 2004, p. 176–185. Sanderson S. K. Review of Robert L. Carneiro, The Muse of History and the Science of Culture. Vol. 2 No 1, March 2003, p. 238–246. Special Issues1 Skalník P. (guest ed.). Ernest Gellner. Vol. 2 No 2, September 2003, p. 4–224. Snooks G. D. (guest ed.). Exploring the Horizons of Big History. Vol. 4 No 1, March 2005, p. 5–188. 1 For contributions to the special issues see the section ‘Articles’ above..
Recommended publications
  • FROM NATIONALISM to REVOLUTIONARY ISLAM This
    FROM NATIONALISM TO REVOLUTIONARY ISLAM This study of dominant social movements in the Middle and Near East by a group of social scientists and historians is the first attempt to bring nationalism and the contemporary Islamic movements into a unified thematic perspective. The process of national economic and political integration supplies the unifying context for the analyses of the various social movements to which it gives rise. The examination of nationalism in general, and of the rise of the Arab nationalist movement in Greater Syria in the early decades of the century in particular, is followed by a close analysis of the interplay of ethnic identity and Islam in the local politics of the tribal North-Western Frontier Province of Pakistan. The politicisation oflslam in Algeria, Turkey and Egypt is then explored and explained, together with the characteristics of the emergent Islamic movements. The last three essays cover Shi'ite Islam in Iran since the opening decade of the century, focusing on various components and aspects of the Islamic movement which culminated in the revolution of 1979.. The case-studies thus chart the recent upsurge of revolutionary Islam and the concomitant decline of nationalist movements in the contemporary Middle and Near East. The introduction offers an analytical perspective for the integration of this major theme which is forcefully suggested by the juxtaposition of the essays. St Antony's! Macmillan Series General editor: Archie Brown, Fellow of St Antony's College, Oxford Said Amir Arjomand (editor) FROM NATIONALISM TO REVOLUTIONARY ISLAM Anders Aslund PRIVATE ENTERPRISE IN EASTERN EUROPE Archie Brown and Michael Kaser (editors) SOVIET POLICY FOR THE 1980s S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ernest Gellner: Civilizational Analysis As a Theory of History
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 41 Number 41 Fall 1999 Article 6 10-1-1999 Ernest Gellner: Civilizational Analysis as a Theory of History Leonidas Donskis Dickinson College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Recommended Citation Donskis, Leonidas (1999) "Ernest Gellner: Civilizational Analysis as a Theory of History," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 41 : No. 41 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol41/iss41/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Donskis: Ernest Gellner: Civilizational Analysis as a Theory of History 56 COMPARATIVE CIVILIZATIONS REVIEW Ernest Gellner: Civilizational Analysis as a Theory of History LEONIDAS DONSKIS There seems to be no general reason why specialists in coercion, and specialists in ritual and legitimation, should not be identical. These two supremely impor- tant specializations are indeed sometimes combined. But it is a fact crucial for the history of mankind that they were very often distinct to a greater or lesser degree. The sword may dominate, but the priests help crystallize cohesion among swordsmen. Ernest Gellner In mapping Gellner's (1925-1995) philosophy of history and civilizational theory, it is very important to refer to his intellectu- al and even ideological background. He obviously belongs to a small minority of the twentieth-century social theoreticians who never passed through a Marxist phase. Gellner's consistent, severe and analytically incisive criticism of Marxism and its sociopolitical effects brings him to the company of such critics of the totalitarian regimes and their ideologies as Hannah Arendt, Karl Jaspers, Raymond Aron, Leszek Kolakowski, and Czeslaw Milosz.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Feuds: Gender, Nationalism and the Family1
    Family Feuds: Gender, Nationalism and the Family1 Anne McClintock All nationalismsare gendered,all are invented,snd all are dangerous- dangerous,not in EricHobsbawm's sense as havingto be opposed,but in the sense of representing relations to political power and to the technologiesof violence.Nationalism, as ErnestGellner notes, invents nationswhere they donot exist, andmost modern nations, despite their appeal to an august and immemorialpast, are of recent invention (Gellner,1964). Benedict Anderson warns, however, that Gellnertends to assimilate 'invention'to 'falsity' rather than to 'imagining'and 'creation'.Anderson, by contrast,views nationsas 'imaginedcommuni- ties' in the sense that they are systems of cultural representation wherebypeople come to imagine a shared experienceof identification with an extendedcommunity (Anderson, 1991: 6). As such, nations are not simply phantasmagoriaof the mind, but are historicaland insti- tutional practices through which social differenceis invented and performed.Nationalism becomes, as a result, radicallyconstitutive of people'sidentities, throughsocial contests that are frequentlyviolent and always gendered.But if the invented nature of nationalismhas found wide theoreticalcurrency, explorations of the genderingof the nationalimaginary have been conspicuouslypaltry. All nations dependon powerfulconstructions of gender.Despite nationalisms'ideological investment in the idea of popular unity, nations have historicallyamounted to the sanctionedinstitutionaliz- ationof genderdifference. No nationin
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Nationalism in an Age of Globalization: the Case of 1
    74 Religious Nationalism in an Age of Globalization: The Case of 1 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2236-463320161405 Benjamin W. Goossen History Department of Harvard University, Cambridge MA, Estados Unidos da América [email protected] Abstract: This article uses the example of Mennonite nation-building in Paraguay during the 1920s and 1930s to argue that state formation is not inherently modernist. Tracing nineteenth and early twentieth-century discourses of Mennonite colonies in Imperial e essay advocates a reevaluation of theories of modern statehood advanced by thinkers like James C. Scott and Ernest Gellner. As conservative, pacifist Mennonites traveled from North America to the Paraguayan Chaco to escape the pressures of assimilation in democratic society, their migration paved the way for coreligionists fleeing persecution in the Soviet Union to join internationally, characterized by deep religious observance, and conceived in opposition to high modernist projects. Keywords: State-building, nationalism, Mennonites, modernity, diaspora, globalization 1 This essay draws on research for my forthcoming book, Chosen Nation: Mennonites and Germany in a Global Era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017, conducted with funding from the Fulbright Commission, the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), and Harvard University. I wish to thank Uwe Freisen of the Menno Colony Archive and Gunolf Niebuhr of the Fernheim Colony Archive for providing primary sources, as well as Rachel Waltner Goossen for her comments. Except where otherwise noted, all translations are my own. While all qualifications in brackets are mine, italicized words are emphasized in the original documents. Almanack. Guarulhos, n.14, p.74-90 dossiê scales of global history 75 During 1936 and 1937, the German geographer Herbert Wilhelmy visited German- speaking settlements across southern Latin America.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence and Democracy - John Keane Index More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521836999 - Violence and Democracy - John Keane Index More information Index Akihiko, Tanaka 19, 177 A Letter to John Farr and John Harris, Al-Fanjari, Ahmad Shawqi 183, 188 Esqrs., Sheriffs of the City of Al-hurriyat’ as-siyasiyyah fi’l Islam 184 Bristol, on the Affairs of America Al-Ghannouchi, Rachid 183, 188, 189, 191 122 ‘The efficiency of using violence to establish an Islamic State’184 Carmichael, Stokely 11 ‘The Islamic movement and violence’ Castoriadis, Cornelius 88 184 China 20, 23 Althusius, Johannes 116, 190 civil society 4, 42–3, 96–9 Politica Methodice digesta atque Ernest Gellner on 43–5 exemplis sacris et profanis ilustrata incompatibility of violence with 38 116 its role in American Revolution 144–6 American Revolution 144–6 rebuilding civil society 129, 130–2 Battle of Trenton 145–6 civil war 25, 112–13 anti-party politics 150–3 civilisation see ‘civilisation’ passim 42–52, apocalyptic terrorism see terrorism 53 Arendt, Hannah 6, 7, 12, 100, 118, 146 civilising process according to Elias Correspondence 1926–1969 (with Karl 55–6 see civility Jaspers) 79 civility 3, 56 On Violence 6, 7, 100, 146 Zygmunt Bauman on 66–7 The Origins of Totalitarianism 98 Samuel Johnson on 42 Aristotle 38–9, 205 and modern state 60–2 on violence 38–9 civility politics 82, 90 Politica 38 civilising process according to Elias 55–6 Aron, Raymond 21, 111 dialectics of 105 Le grand schisme 111 rebuilding civil society 129, 130–2 Les dernieres` annees´ du siecle` 163 Clastres, Pierre 115 Augustine 11, 206 Recherches d’anthropologie
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Theory of Nationalism
    UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN 36th ANNUAL SOROKIN LECTURE How Homogenous Must We Be? Reflections on the Theory of Nationalism Dr. John A. Hall Dean, Faculty of Arts McGill University Delivered January 27, 2005, at the University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada ©Copyright the University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, 2006 I.S.B.N.: 0-88880-514-4 ABSTRACT One of the last and greatest thinkers of Jewish origin from Central Europe, Ernest Gellner, produced a theory of nationalism insisting that the very nature of modernity involved the creation of homogeneous nation-states. I explain why he felt like this, describe his theory of nationalism, note criticisms properly directed against its explanatory mechanisms, insist on the considerable cogency of his basic insight, seek to provide alternative and improved explanatory mechanisms, and end with reflections on our changed political economy – so as to assess the extent to which previous horrors can be avoided. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Dr. John A. Hall received his PhD from the London School of Economics in 1976. He has been a Professor at McGill University since 1991. He was appointed the James McGill Professor in 2001, and he is currently Dean of the Faculty of Arts. Professor Hall held previous academic appointments at Southampton and Harvard Universities. He was an Invited Fellow at the Swedish Collegium for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences in Uppsala, Sweden (1999-2000); Visiting Research Professor at Queen’s University in Belfast (1999-2002); Honorary Professor in Sociology and Political Science at Copenhagen University (2000-2004); and the Fowler Hamilton Fellow at Christ Church College, Oxford (2003).
    [Show full text]
  • An Appraisal of Ernest Gellner's Writings on Nationalism
    B.J.Pol.S. 27, 191–222 Copyright 1997 Cambridge University Press Printed in Great Britain On the Nature of Nationalism: An Appraisal of Ernest Gellner’s Writings on Nationalism BRENDAN O’LEARY* Ernest Gellner’s is the best-known modernist explanatory theory of nationalism. This article summarizes its expression and development before considering its strengths and weaknesses. Discussion centres on Gellner’s functionalist mode of explanation, the place of nationalism in his philosophy of history, the predictive and retrodictive nature of his theory, and the merits of his typology of nationalism. The apolitical character of his writings is emphasized: in particular, though Gellner established the connections between nationalism and egalitarianism in modern societies, he did not emphasize the mutually reinforcing relationships between nationalism, egalitarianism and democratization; moreover, his contempt for nationalist doctrines is not something liberals, socialists and conservatives need share. The theoretical problem is to separate the quite spurious ‘national’ and ‘natural’ justifications and explanations of nationalism, from the genuine, time- and context-bound roots of it. Ernest Gellner, Thought and Change, 1964, p. 151. Nationalism, the most potent principle of political legitimacy in the modem world, holds that the nation should be collectively and freely institutionally expressed, and ruled by its co-nationals. Recent events demonstrate nationalist movements retain the capacity to shake states and empires, as well as the pieties
    [Show full text]
  • Two Perspectives on the Relationship of Ethnicity to Nationalism: Comparing Gellner and Smith
    TWO PERSPECTIVES ON THE RELATIONSHIP OF ETHNICITY TO NATIONALISM: COMPARING GELLNER AND SMITH Huseyin ISIKSAL* “There can be no society which does not feel the need of upholding and reaffirming at regular intervals the collective sentiments and the collective ideas which make its unity and its personality.” Emile Durkheim Introduction The ethnic root of nationalism felt into the agenda of international relations theory, particularly since the 1970s, when resurgence of ethnic nationalism has witnessed in many parts of the world. Today, it is widely acknowledged that ethnicity plays a crucial role in nationalism, especially after the recent ethnic based conflicts in the former Yugoslavia and in the former Soviet Union. However, there are few detailed studies that focus on the relationship between ethnicity and nationalism and especially among the comparison of Anthony D. Smith and Ernest Gellner, as two distinctive scholars on these concepts. In this article I simply sought to bridge this gap. Accordingly, ethnicity and nationalism are highly inter-related but what is the relationship between them? This analysis attempts to shed some light on this issue by considering the works of two aforementioned authors who made considerable contributions in developing of theories relating ethnicity to nationalism. It is worth stressing that it is not the purpose of this essay to analyse and focus on the causes and consequences of the recent ethnic conflicts in particular parts of the world. Therefore, the reader of this essay will not find a particular analysis related with ethnic conflicts that are caused by nationalism. The unique aim of this paper is Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, Vol.1, No.1, (Spring 2002) 1 to compare and contrast the literature of Smith and Gellner and analyse the role of ethnicity on nationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Gellner's Structural-Functional-Culturalism Hann, Chris
    www.ssoar.info Gellner's Structural-Functional-Culturalism Hann, Chris Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Hann, C. (2001). Gellner's Structural-Functional-Culturalism. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 9(2), 173-181. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-53524 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses
    [Show full text]
  • Ernest Renan and the Question of Race. Jane Victoria Dagon Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1999 Ernest Renan and the Question of Race. Jane Victoria Dagon Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Dagon, Jane Victoria, "Ernest Renan and the Question of Race." (1999). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 6937. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/6937 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Anthropology Comes Home: a Brief History of the Ethnographic Study of Law John M
    University of North Carolina School of Law Masthead Logo Carolina Law Scholarship Repository Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1993 Legal Anthropology Comes Home: A Brief History of the Ethnographic Study of Law John M. Conley University of North Carolina School of Law, [email protected] William M. O'Barr Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/faculty_publications Part of the Law Commons Publication: Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LEGAL ANTHROPOLOGY COMES HOME: A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY OF LAW John M. Conley* William M. O'Barr** I. INTRODUCTION Anthropology is a relative newcomer to the ranks of the social sci- ences. It began to emerge as an autonomous field in the second half of the nineteenth century when a diverse array of scholars and speculators converged around such issues as the defining characteristics of humanity and the nature and origins of human society. In the topics they chose to pursue, the way they framed their questions, and the strategies they used to find answers, these nascent anthropologists were strongly influenced by the disciplines from which they had come. An early and significant example of this interdisciplinary influence is the famous Cambridge Anthropological Expedition to the Torres Straits of 1898.1 The expedition was organized by Alfred Cort Haddon, a zool- ogy professor who had a brief and unsuccessful career in his father's printing business.2 Its purpose was to comprehensively survey the physi- cal characteristics, language, culture, and thought patterns of the in- habitants of the straits separating New Guinea and Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining Nations: an Anthropological Perspective
    76 Samah Sabra Imagining Nations: An Anthropological Perspective Samah Sabra School ofCanadian Studies Carleton University Introduction: The nation emerges as a powerfitl historical idea in the west. An idea ·whose cultural compulsion lies in the impossible unity ofthe nation as a symbolicforce. -Bhabha 1990a:1 Until recently, and with few exceptions, anthropologists have generally not undetiaken studies ofnations, nationalism, or nation-states. Largely, this has been due to the assumption that "nations and nationalist ideologies are definitely modern large-scale phenomena" (Eriksen 2003:97) - and thus too "Western" and macro for anthropological attention (Das and Poole 2004; Kelly and Kaplan 2001). I Ofthe anthropological studies that have been undertaken, most followed the 1983 publication ofBenedict Anderson's Imagined Communities, considered a benchmark in the study of nations and nationalism (Kelly and Kaplan 2001). By linking nationalism to kinship and religion (more traditionally anthropological interests), Anderson opened possibilities for anthropological studies of nationalism. Veena Das and Deborah Poole argue that anthropologists' late attention to nations and nationalisms results from the discipline's "origins as the study of 'primitive' peoples... [so that] anthropology's subject, until recently, was NEXUS: Volume 20 (2007) Imagining Nations 77 understood to be primitive or 'non-state' societies" (2004:3, emphasis added). As Das and Poole recognize, evident in this argument is a taken-for-granted association between nations and states, wherein "nation" is synonymous with "nation­ state." This assumed association, which they encourage anthropologists to rethink, runs through both popular and academic imaginaries ofnations. One attempt to undo the assumed nation-state link comes from Anthony Smith (1989), who offers his readers a binary, typological distinction between "ethnic" and "civic" nationalisms.
    [Show full text]